From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 01:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010132.n511WH4X010708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #12 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-31 21:32:15 EDT --- [My machine crashed just before I pressed the commit button of the review :( ] Note that, as I have not the sponsor status, that is not an official review. However, there are a number of issues (some important, some others less) that I can point to you (in no particular order). 1. Doxygen, as it is configured, generates .map files (in the doc/html sub-directory), due to the use of the DOT tool (belonging to the graphviz package). On some configurations (e.g., my Fedora rawhide/11, with rpmbuild), some of those files are generated with a zero-length, which rpmlint then complains of. There are, at least, two solutions/work-arounds: 1.a. Just drop the use of DOT in the Doxygen configuration file: HAVE_DOT = NO as in http://rmol.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/rmol/trunk/rmol/doc/doxygen_html.cfg.in?revision=183&view=markup As Doxygen replaces with other, simpler, diagrams, that should not be a so big issue. 1.b. Keep the use of DOT, but: - Add a 'BuildRequires: graphivz' directive. - Remove any zero-length-map files after the Doxygen generation (http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/asterisk/F-11/asterisk.spec?revision=1.51&view=markup): find doc/html -name '*.map' -size 0 -delete Note that with mock, there is, as is, no zero-length-map-file issue, but the .map files are not generated, due to the missing 'BuildRequires: graphviz' directive. Note also that you can not see that in the build.log (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1383290&name=build.log) of Koji, as you have re-directed the output log of Doxygen into a file removed by mock. 2. Avoid re-directing the output log of Doxygen, so that that log be present in the build.log generated by mock (and Koji): make doxy > doxymake.log 2> doxymake.stderr ==> make doxy 3. You may consider creating a separate -doc sub-package for both the HTML Doxygen-generated documentation and the Latex-generated tutorial (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Documentation). 4. I would rather keep the PDF version of the tutorial, rather than the DVI one. Moreover, we could alter the Makefile so that it generates only the PDF version (which is now the default with latex). 5. In the %files section, you should take ownership of the %{_includedir}/bits directory (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership): %dir %{_includedir}/bits/ 6. Still in the %files sections, it may be better to use a wildcard for the libraries, as it will still hold for future versions of the library: %{_libdir}/libstxxl.so.* 7. You may replace instances of stxxl with the %{name} macro, and of 1.2.1 with the %{version} macro (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Macros). For instance: --------------------------------------------------- URL: http://%{name}.sourceforge.net Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz Patch0: %{name}-build-shared.patch Patch1: %{name}-build-shared-makefile.patch --------------------------------------------------- x. The build system (makefiles) appears to be very specific to that package, and it may not be portable. For instance, you have to install the files manually yourself in the specification file. If you consider to bring a GNU Autotools environment (and submit the corresponding patch upstream), and if I can help you, do not hesitate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 01:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 31 May 2009 21:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010137.n511bA84011724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #13 from Denis Arnaud 2009-05-31 21:37:09 EDT --- If it may help, the above comments (plus a few small others) have been integrated into a new version of the specification file: Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/6/stxxl.spec (as well as the corresponding Source RPM: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/6/stxxl-1.2.1-6.fc10.src.rpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 04:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010448.n514mHkA014799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-01 00:48:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > ! The file CHANGELOG can go to a %doc The CHANGELOG file's last entry is for version 2.1.3, the current version is 5.1. Since the CHANGELOG file is not maintained it doesn't make much sense to include it. > * The source extraction guide is incomplete. The original source tree contains > a ./java directory, which is missing from your tarball. Is there a reason? Yes, the java directory is not part of the globus-rls-client source package, but a separate source package of its own. The build GPT build instructions in the pkgdata directory does not contain information about how to build the java package. The java directory contains its own pkgdata directory with build instructions for the java package. I have added a line to the source extraction guide that removes the java directory before packaging the source tarball. > ? There is some html documentation under the ./Doc directory. Currently there > is a doxygen documentation in the doc package which seemed to me rather > useless. Shall we replace it with the html documentation from the ./Doc > directory? The bug is in the LAC_DOXYGEN call in configure.in - it points to the main directory instead of the library subdirectory. Fixed. > * Please fix the compilation warnings of the type > rpc.c:395: warning: format '%d' expects type 'int', but argument 3 has type > 'globus_size_t' Fixed. http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-client.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 04:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010453.n514rlRU016005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 00:53:46 EDT --- I think you can even follow suggestion given on that guidelines page 1. Rename scripts in %{_bindir} to not have a .py extension: For instance, from /usr/bin/orient.py to /usr/bin/orient. This will clean rpmlint output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 04:59:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 00:59:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503298] Review Request: vim-bash-support - BASH-IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010459.n514xfHO022437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503298 --- Comment #1 from Ricky Zhou 2009-06-01 00:59:40 EDT --- Some other package submissions from cga: vim-c-support (bug 503300) vim-nerdtree (bug 503301) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:09:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:09:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010509.n5159fUS019550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 01:09:39 EDT --- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386463 missing "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" as per given at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python/Eggs#Providing_Eggs_for_non-setuptools_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010509.n515991U019464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 01:09:07 EDT --- build failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386463 missing "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" as per given at -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010514.n515EhtA020450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rzhou at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Ricky Zhou 2009-06-01 01:14:42 EDT --- I don't think the iconv in %prep is necessary in this one, since README.csupport looks fine in the zip file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:16:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:16:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010516.n515GKQF025836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-01 01:16:18 EDT --- May you import it as soon as possible, I am looking to package whole gnome-shell and stack packages and dependencies and this is blocker .. please update to latest stable release ? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010527.n515RO1A022663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 01:27:23 EDT --- please enable tests. use %check make test Can you resubmit spec that will follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl? Also, you can use "cpanspec Crypt-GPG" to create spec file. see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Perl/cpanspec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010540.n515ed7M029861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: gnaughty - |Review Request: gnaughty - |porn downloader |Downloader for adult | |content -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010545.n515jPTU030628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #24 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-01 01:45:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool-0.10-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386504 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010547.n515lMDr025659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 --- Comment #25 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-01 01:47:22 EDT --- Apologies for the massive delays with everything as of late: $life and $work are conspiring against free time. There's a scratch build of the latest above; though I see I need to bump the version of Module::Install (to avoid the CPAN spew) and make sure Fedora::Bugzilla is at 0.10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 05:56:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 01:56:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010556.n515uQpd027059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 01:56:25 EDT --- 1) use patch names prefixed with package name Patch0: blueproximity-fedorization.diff Patch1: blueproximity-fix-bash-script.diff also, change %prep as %patch0 -p0 -b .fedorization %patch1 -p0 -b .fix-bash-script 2) no need to use vendor in desktop-file-install. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop-file-install_usage Remove fedora word from fedora-blueproximity.desktop file name. 3) files section should look like %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc ChangeLog COPYING README doc/ %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/%{name} %{_datadir}/applications/fedora-%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}_base.svg 4) fix following warning fedora-blueproximity.desktop: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character 5) preserve timestamps by using install command as "install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 06:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010605.n51656a1028420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 02:05:06 EDT --- also, I think according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ#How_do_I_figure_out_what_version_of_the_GPL.2FLGPL_my_package_is_under.3F license for this package is GPL+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 06:36:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:36:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010636.n516a7ZC006277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-01 02:36:07 EDT --- Thanks for the comments - I fixed this issue: http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-gnutls.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-gnutls-1.1.8-2.fc10.src.rpm koji scratchbuild: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 06:37:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:37:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010637.n516bpFD006625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-01 02:37:50 EDT --- Added missing BR - python-setuptools-devel http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-application.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-application-1.1.1-2.fc10.src.rpm koji scratchbuild http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 06:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 02:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010648.n516mqvW003827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #4 from Tomas Smetana 2009-06-01 02:48:51 EDT --- I've committed some changes to the devel branch: rpmlint seems to be silent now. I used only part of the diff you posted here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:06:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:06:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010706.n5176NFu013379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-01 03:06:22 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010706.n5176K3i008534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-01 03:06:19 EDT --- Package available in devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:19:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:19:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010719.n517JDqa011175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 03:19:12 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010718.n517IOud015966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #22 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-01 03:18:23 EDT --- Yes, you cannot ship binary executables in %doc. Now it's just a question of a) finding a place to put them (say, %{_libdir}/%{name}) b) not shipping them at all If you decide to ship them, they should be branched out to a separate package, -examples. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010719.n517JmCX011323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 03:19:47 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/agedu-0-1.r8442.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010730.n517U5eP013529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-01 03:30:04 EDT --- Okay. - I wouldn't ship man as %doc. - Change BuildRequires: /usr/bin/desktop-file-install to BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils - You need to conserve time stamps in character set conversion, use for i in AUTHORS docs/man/{de,es}/*.?; do iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 "$i" > "${i}_" && \ touch -r "$i" "${i}_" && \ mv "${i}_" "$i" done This is also safe, since it fails if a command is not completed OK. - I'm wondering if autoreconfing is really needed; you could just use the trick at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath - Why is clean commented out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 07:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 03:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010748.n517mpQ3017441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Smetana 2009-06-01 03:48:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Okay. > > - I wouldn't ship man as %doc. This is something I couldn't find in the guidelines so I didn't change what I inherited. Both make sense to me. > - Change > BuildRequires: /usr/bin/desktop-file-install > to > BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils > > - You need to conserve time stamps in character set conversion, use > for i in AUTHORS docs/man/{de,es}/*.?; do > iconv -f iso-8859-1 -t utf-8 "$i" > "${i}_" && \ > touch -r "$i" "${i}_" && \ > mv "${i}_" "$i" > done > This is also safe, since it fails if a command is not completed OK. Right. Will do. > - I'm wondering if autoreconfing is really needed; you could just use the trick > at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Removing_Rpath This is due to the new ALSA mixer patch and libtoolize. I think it's simpler like this. > - Why is clean commented out? Because I'm an idiot and don't check what I commit carefully. (It's a remain of debugging the new libtool issue.) Thanks for your help. I will incorporate the changes to the spec file, rebuild and update this bugzilla. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 08:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 04:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010819.n518J2LW025458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-01 04:19:01 EDT --- Okay, once you have built the new revision in rawhide I will do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 08:29:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 04:29:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010829.n518TpdF032501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #8 from Tomas Smetana 2009-06-01 04:29:50 EDT --- Done. Hope it's better this time. Maybe even good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 08:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 04:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010850.n518ov24000786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #46 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-01 04:50:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #44) > (In reply to comment #43) .. > I am also using x86_64. Here is the picture: > http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/temp/blender-yafaray.png I'm using a modified version of blender-2.48a-22 and that's the first time I see it, I will retry with an unmodified version from F-11 x86_64. > That is how upstream is doing. They moved from 1.0 - 305 to 1.0 - 315: Okay, that was my bad, the version is indeed 0.1.0.315. > I have posted a message in yafaray Building forum and did not receive a > single reply. Please reminds that the docs is the source code itself at the end. If you cannot have a > > The current package provided above doesn't work at all. > > What do you mean by that? It is working for me just fine. Have you tried > it? Does it segfault? Funny that you talk about segfault, because there is indeed one. Quoting: ---------------- creating new QApplication /usr/bin/blender: line 88: 7113 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/${blend}.bin $@ ---------------- Now what remains weird, is that even before the segfault the yafaray plugin doesn't seems to remind the previous configuration. (example: for using the xml parser for rendering). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 09:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010901.n5191JIc003487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-01 05:01:18 EDT --- All members of the "packager" group may do official package-reviews and package-approvals. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 09:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010915.n519FJ6D011281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 05:15:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386455 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4b196b07524f55422c64113aee1a5bcbbf249ee9 easystroke-0.4.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available. + Does owns the directories it creates. + gtk-update-icon-cache scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Desktop file installed correctly. + GUI application Suggestions: 1) I don't see mimetype written in desktop file so according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database, drop update-desktop-database from SPEC. 2) I think you should own only svg file and add Requires: hicolor-icon-theme and change in %files as %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/easystroke.svg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 09:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 05:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906010938.n519cAHA016483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #47 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-01 05:38:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > (In reply to comment #44) > > (In reply to comment #43) > .. > > I am also using x86_64. Here is the picture: > > http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/temp/blender-yafaray.png > I'm using a modified version of blender-2.48a-22 and that's the first time I > see it, I will retry with an unmodified version from F-11 x86_64. I am using F10 x86_64. > > > That is how upstream is doing. They moved from 1.0 - 305 to 1.0 - 315: > Okay, that was my bad, the version is indeed 0.1.0.315. > > > I have posted a message in yafaray Building forum and did not receive a > > single reply. > Please reminds that the docs is the source code itself at the end. If you > cannot have a > > > > The current package provided above doesn't work at all. > > > > What do you mean by that? It is working for me just fine. Have you tried > > it? Does it segfault? > Funny that you talk about segfault, because there is indeed one. Quoting: > ---------------- > creating new QApplication > /usr/bin/blender: line 88: 7113 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/${blend}.bin > $@ > ---------------- I used to have segfaults before the 1.0.305 version. It worked with F8 but not with F10. I think it was because of different xorg versions. Since the official 1.0 release, I did not have any problem at all with F10, though. What video card are you using? > > Now what remains weird, is that even before the segfault the yafaray plugin > doesn't seems to remind the previous configuration. (example: for using the xml > parser for rendering). I would suggest that you try on F10 first, if possible. Then, you go to F11 so we can compare the results. There are packages for F9 to F11. Hopefully, we can get some people willing to test them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503482] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv4 - SBLIM nfsv4 instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv4 - SBLIM nfsv4 instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503482 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-nfsv4 - SBLIM nfsv4 instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv4/sblim-cmpi-nfsv4.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-nfsv4/sblim-cmpi-nfsv4-1.0.12-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Nfsv4 Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:08:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:08:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011008.n51A8ZDb023911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011008.n51A87BP023771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 06:08:06 EDT --- Koji scratch build link is for python-application package. Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386637 + rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. ==> See suggestion2. + source files match upstream url 599bba969380fadc719fb49a94e5efd95084637d python-gnutls-1.1.8.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package python-gnutls-1.1.8-2.fc12.i586 => Provides: _gnutls_init.so Requires: /usr/bin/env libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libgnutls-extra.so.26 libgnutls-extra.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) libgnutls.so.26 libgnutls.so.26(GNUTLS_1_4) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpython2.6.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) use %global instead %define 2) Add to %prep chmod 644 examples/*.py to silent rpmlint messages python-gnutls.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/twisted-server.py python-gnutls.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/client.py python-gnutls.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/server.py python-gnutls.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/twisted-client.py python-gnutls.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/crypto.py python-gnutls.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/twisted-server.py /usr/bin/env python-gnutls.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/client.py /usr/bin/env python-gnutls.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/server.py /usr/bin/env python-gnutls.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/twisted-client.py /usr/bin/env python-gnutls.i586: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/python-gnutls-1.1.8/examples/crypto.py /usr/bin/env APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:18:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:18:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011018.n51AIGBe021740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #4 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-01 06:18:15 EDT --- done. Spec URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SPECS/easystroke.spec SRPM URL: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-11/SRPMS/easystroke-0.4.4-3.fc11.src.rpm We do not need this: Requires: hicolor-icon-theme I built some packages witohut that and nobody compliant (include my sponsor ;) ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011019.n51AJXnd026722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mnowak at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-01 06:19:32 EDT --- Dunno the code logic but ripping out: else: raise IOError(_("Can't find %(path)s in any known prefix!") % { "path": path, }) from /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/arista/utils.py makes you start the app at least. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011050.n51AoGvO001687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #15 from D Haley 2009-06-01 06:50:13 EDT --- I agree with all of the changes made in your SRPM, and support its promotion pending review. I suppose this makes you co-maintainer? Do we need another reviewer? Here are koji builds for the above SRPM, F9 failed, but F10 and F11 are OK. F9 is relatively close to EOL, so I suppose its not a big problem. F9 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386757 F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386748 F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386762 >If you consider to bring a GNU Autotools environment (and submit the >corresponding patch upstream), and if I can help you, do not hesitate. I think it is not necessarily a good idea to bring a different build system to STXXL, but instead to help upstream to improve their chosen method. I would hesitate to recommend a change of build sys to upstream, unless they expressed an interest in doing so. For this reason I do not have any plans to do such a thing, unless upstream indicate they would be interested. In any case, I don't see this as important to this package for this version. Maybe in a newer upstream version after some petitioning... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 10:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 06:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011057.n51AvisZ003600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #16 from D Haley 2009-06-01 06:57:43 EDT --- Hmm I spoke a bit too soon. The use of noarch is causing problems with rpmlint, as noarch is being applied to the main package. If we remove noarch from the -doc section, all is well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:05:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:05:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011105.n51B5V5n032152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-01 07:05:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > Note that, as I have not the sponsor status, that is not an official review. > However, there are a number of issues (some important, some others less) that I Denis, feel free to reassign this ticket to yourself (and, therefore, proceed with reviewing further). As you're a packager, then you may do the formal review (actually, you're almost finished reviewing this package :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:10:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:10:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011110.n51BAWpi000892@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011116.n51BGBXj007647@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-01 07:16:10 EDT --- Done. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-gnutls.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/python-gnutls-1.1.8-2.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-gnutls Short Description: Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library Owners: peter Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011117.n51BHXFi007759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 07:17:32 EDT --- you can find packages requiring hicolor-icon-theme using repoquery -q --whatrequires hicolor-icon-theme But, anyway hicolor-icon-theme is in the dependency chain, don't add it. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:16:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:16:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011116.n51BGdcL001859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226209] Merge Review: nut In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011118.n51BIm7r002032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226209 Tomas Smetana changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|tsmetana at redhat.com |mhlavink at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Tomas Smetana 2009-06-01 07:18:46 EDT --- Adding the current maintainer to cc: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011121.n51BLuxm008624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:21:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:21:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011121.n51BLg7P002763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #6 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-01 07:21:41 EDT --- Thank you for review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: easystroke Short Description: Gesture-recognition application for X11 Owners: grof Branches: F9 F10 F11 InitialCC: grof -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] New: Review Request: ayttm Universal Instant Messaging Client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ayttm Universal Instant Messaging Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 Summary: Review Request: ayttm Universal Instant Messaging Client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mvaliyav at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ayttm.spec SRPM URL: http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ayttm-0.5.0-89.fc11.src.rpm Description: Ayttm is designed to become a Universal Instant Messaging client, seamlessly integrating all existing Instant Messaging clients and providing a single consistant user interface. Currently, Ayttm supports sending and receiving messages through AOL, ICQ, Yahoo, MSN, IRC and Jabber. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 11:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 07:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011143.n51BhwRZ013378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 Minto Joseph changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ayttm |Review Request: ayttm - |Universal Instant Messaging |Universal Instant Messaging |Client |Client -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011216.n51CGWso020399@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-01 08:16:29 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: vidalia New Branches: EL-5 Owners: cassmodiah -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011208.n51C8OYq013211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-01 08:08:23 EDT --- Parag, can you please point out, where my spec file does not match with the https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl guidelines? The following list compares https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl with my spec file where "NA" means that it doesn't applicate here and "--" that I'm missing it. The only thing, I'm really missing is %check, that's right. And that's solved in -2 now. [OK] License tag [OK] Directory Ownership [OK] Perl Requires and Provides [OK] Core modules as buildrequires [OK] Versioned MODULE_COMPAT_ Requires [NA] Filtering Requires: and Provides [OK] Manual Requires and Provides [OK] URL tag [--] Testing and Test Suites [NA] When to *not* test [NA] Conditionally enabling/disabling tests [OK] Makefile.PL vs Build.PL [NA] .h files in module packages Why should I use cpanspec if my spec file is valid and follows the policies? Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011228.n51CSqZ7017224@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |paul at city-fan.org --- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth 2009-06-01 08:28:51 EDT --- Looks reasonable to me except that you shouldn't be generating and shipping the COPYING and Artistic files since they're not included in the upstream distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:40:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:40:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226508] Merge Review: tvtime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011240.n51CeCGR025407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226508 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-01 08:40:10 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - You are using %{buildroot} and $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, please change the latter to %{optflags}. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - Some files are MIT licensed (e.g. src/xfullscreen.{c,h}), but MIT license is compatible with GPL/LGPL. - Also LGPL is compatible with GPL, so license tag could in principle be just GPLv2+. - Current GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ is most informative, so it's best to keep it as it is. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Time stamps are not conserved in install, add INSTALL="install -p" as argument to make install. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - Package must Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership. (no Requires(post): and Requires(postun): hicolor-icon-theme, should be just Requires: hicolor-icon-theme). MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. NEEDSWORK - I don't think directories can be listed as config. I'd change %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/tvtime/ to %dir %{_sysconfdir}/tvtime/ %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/tvtime/tvtime.xml MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Include COPYING.LGPL. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503495] New: Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503495 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cim-client - Java CIM Client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cim-client/sblim-cim-client.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cim-client/sblim-cim-client-1.3.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this package is to provide a CIM Client Class Library for Java applications. It complies to the DMTF standard CIM Operations over HTTP and intends to be compatible with JCP JSR48 once it becomes available. To learn more about DMTF visit http://www.dmtf.org. More infos about the Java Community Process and JSR48 can be found at http://www.jcp.org and http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=48. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011244.n51Cijbd026259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #4 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-01 08:44:44 EDT --- According to bug #225735 comment #9 from Fedora Legal it doesn't really matter which license file is shipped within the RPM package. There upstream shipped a GPLv3 license file for a GPLv2-only software. And at bug #193960 comment #6 I even got asked to generate the missing license file to avoid confusion, which is the same situation here IMHO. I already sent an upstream request to add this file for newer releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503496] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-params - SBLIM params instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-params - SBLIM params instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503496 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-params - SBLIM params instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-params/sblim-cmpi-params.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-params/sblim-cmpi-params-1.2.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Params Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 12:59:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:59:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011259.n51CxDGU023035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2009-06-01 08:59:12 EDT --- The request in which you were asked to generate the missing file is somewhat dated - in fact it was common practice amongst the perl SIG at that time to add the files. However, since then the packaging guidelines have changed and now quite clearly state that license text should be included if and only if upstream includes them: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 14:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503510] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-sysfs - SBLIM sysfs instrumentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-sysfs - SBLIM sysfs instrumentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503510 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-sysfs - SBLIM sysfs instrumentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-sysfs/sblim-cmpi-sysfs.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-sysfs/sblim-cmpi-sysfs-1.1.9-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Standards Based Linux Instrumentation Sysfs Providers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 14:50:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 10:50:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] New: Review Request: bastet - An evil Tetris like game Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bastet - An evil Tetris like game https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Summary: Review Request: bastet - An evil Tetris like game Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc at foresightlinux.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet-0.43-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bastet stands for "bastard tetris", and is a simple ncurses-based Tetris(R) clone for Linux. Unlike normal Tetris(R), however, Bastet does not choose your next brick at random. Instead, it uses a special algorithm designed to choose the worst brick possible. As you can imagine, playing Bastet can be a very frustrating experience! rpmlint: no output scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1387035 md5sum: local b47090daa7b6d89b98b5b477cf155733 bastet-0.43.tgz upstream b47090daa7b6d89b98b5b477cf155733 bastet-0.43.tgz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 15:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011503.n51F3qhN027240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 15:05:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:05:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011505.n51F5olR028017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 11:05:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The request in which you were asked to generate the missing file is somewhat > dated - in fact it was common practice amongst the perl SIG at that time to add > the files. However, since then the packaging guidelines have changed and now > quite clearly state that license text should be included if and only if > upstream includes them: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines > > MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc I agree here. This is one point that I see capnspec does not needed to create manually COPYING and Artistic files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 15:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011511.n51FBw2n029729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-01 11:11:56 EDT --- I'll drop COPYING and Artistic files generation, if that makes you happy. What else has to be changed or work needs to happen? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 15:21:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:21:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011521.n51FLIwf000545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Sean Middleditch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(sean at middleditch. | |us) | --- Comment #8 from Sean Middleditch 2009-06-01 11:21:16 EDT --- Still on it, I've been a bit swamped getting ready for a cross-country move. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 15:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011540.n51FeV1D030676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #23 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-01 11:40:28 EDT --- > (actually gtkmm24-devel pulls in also glibmm24-devel, so basically > you need only BR: gtkmm24-devel) Trimming down BR is a waste of time. Please don't suggest it. There have been several cases where it has lead to problems (when files were moved, packages renamed, inter-package dependencies changed). Remember that the spec file's BuildRequires become the src.rpm's Requires, which you may want to query with tools. And gtkmm-utils looks for the glibmm-2.4.pc and gtkmm-2.4.pc pkgconfig files, so your previous suggestion... > - The package should only > BuildRequires: gtkmm24-devel glibmm24-devel ... is fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 15:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011559.n51Fxu0E003763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-01 11:59:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > Why should I use cpanspec if my spec file is valid and follows the policies? > 1)Can you please tell me why its needed to use PREFIX=%{_prefix} in %build. 2) according to standard perl spec template, I see that %install should use make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null ';' chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* I will leave this to you. If you are unhappy with this do tell me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 16:11:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:11:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011611.n51GBQ3w015416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-01 12:11:25 EDT --- Thanks! ---------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-rls-client) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 16:10:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:10:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011610.n51GAFrw007151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #8 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-01 12:10:13 EDT --- thx for your review Pierre, I tried to contact upstream more than twice. no reaction.. I haven't the elan to solve for this issue. Let's close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 16:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil Tetris like game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011611.n51GBIr6007455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-01 12:11:17 EDT --- Yeah... so you're going to have to remove the visible references to the "Tetris" trademark here. The rule of thumb is: "If it is visible to the end user, it needs to go away." This includes your spec Summary and Description, any places in the code where "Tetris" is displayed to the user, and any references in the documentation. Once you've done that, please post an updated SRPM and I'll audit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 16:46:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 12:46:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011646.n51Gk27L024877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #9 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-01 12:45:58 EDT --- Usually using "pure_install" fails on RHEL 4, looks like this package is an exception compared to others, tested it explicitly on RHEL 4 few minutes ago. Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:06:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:06:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011806.n51I6gCl008788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #24 from Gareth John 2009-06-01 14:06:41 EDT --- ------------------------------- * Mon Jun 01 2009 Gareth John gareth.l.john at googlemail.com 0.4.0-6 - Added doc pack/description/files - Enabled doc build in configure - Added doxygen buildreq for -doc - Added glibmm24-devel to BR - Added examples pkg - Added move commands under install - Added mkdir command under install -------------------------------- Rpmlint says: $ rpmlint -i RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-example-0.4.0-6.fc10.i386.rpm gtkmm-utils-example.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. gtkmm-utils-example.i386: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. $ rpmlint -i RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-doc-0.4.0-6.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-6.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-6.fc10.i386.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-6.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. --------------------------------- Files: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-6.fc10.src.rpm --------------------------------- I followed Michaels comment on the BRs and edited them. Also added the doc subpackage which includes the docs for developers, this also made me add doxygen as a BR. Following on from previous comments i assume that the one warning in examples is justified as it would just be replicated doc from main package. Also the dir i put it in following comments threw up a warning again i assume this is ok? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:15:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:15:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011815.n51IFIvd019223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Antti Andreimann 2009-06-01 14:15:16 EDT --- Thank You! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xml-security-c Short Description: C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML Owners: anttix Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011815.n51IFXfM011755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 --- Comment #9 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-06-01 14:15:32 EDT --- It's a pity but I understand. If you ever manage to get upstream in touch and able to make Bauble working on the latest version of Fedora I will be happy to re-do the review :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011818.n51IIN0h012388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #25 from Gareth John 2009-06-01 14:18:22 EDT --- Also just added brackets to email address in changelog, file has been updated. Further to this checked spec file in rpmlint and got no errors or warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:21:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:21:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484934] Review Request: vidalia - QT-GUI for tor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011821.n51ILtiS021187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484934 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-01 14:21:53 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011823.n51IN7f9013958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-01 14:23:05 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011824.n51IOjhG014437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-01 14:24:43 EDT --- Please note branch names are "F-9", "F-10", "F-11". CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:26:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:26:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011826.n51IQ9or022577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-01 14:26:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:25:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:25:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011825.n51IPUWe015081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-01 14:25:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:34:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:34:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011834.n51IYJBR017499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #18 from Paul Lange 2009-06-01 14:34:17 EDT --- What's the state of this? Anyone working on review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011833.n51IX4KL017205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 14:33:02 EDT --- globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:33:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011833.n51IX7iu017251@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 14:33:06 EDT --- globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011833.n51IX8iP017290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 14:33:08 EDT --- globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011833.n51IXHYq025280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 14:33:16 EDT --- globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011833.n51IXCUc025208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 14:33:12 EDT --- globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:33:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:33:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011833.n51IXDUW025238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 14:33:13 EDT --- globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011851.n51IpuRB022289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Jerry James 2009-06-01 14:51:55 EDT --- The ChangeLog for the xemacs-packages-extra RPM has this entry: * Fri Mar 03 2006 Ville Skytt? - 20051208-2 - Drop JDE; the full source for jde.jar doesn't seem to be available and even the included parts won't build with gcj eg. due to use of com.sun.* things. Additionally it requires third party jars which are not currently available in Fedora Core or Extras. So let's not inflict a crippled version of JDE on anyone; JDE users can install the upstream jde package using XEmacs package tools. (#180941) How much of that is true for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 18:57:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 14:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011857.n51IvuEJ023555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #19 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-01 14:57:55 EDT --- Paul, if you want it, feel free to take over the review. I've gotten suddenly busy with the release looming. (I can still sponsor if you are satisfied with Mauricio's work). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] New: Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Crud Controller Extension for TG2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011934.n51JY4m6007485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #3 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-01 15:34:03 EDT --- Good: + License tag says GPLv2 now. Bad: - Header files has a reverence of special exceptions on the copyright notes, which are not clarified. - package doesn't contains a verbatin copy of the license text. The LICENSE files only told anything about the GPL and down't match with the copyright note of the source files, because the LICENSE files allow the use of a later version of the GPL, but the copyright notes on the sources doesn't. Please calrified the licensing situation of your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] New: Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Summary: Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:39:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:39:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011939.n51Jdj5Q008989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-06-01 15:39:45 EDT --- Sorry, wrong links: Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-admin.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-admin-0.2.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011940.n51Je3m7009327@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 John (J5) Palmieri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |johnp at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-06-01 15:40:02 EDT --- rpmlint python-tgext-crud-0.2.4-1.fc9.noarch.rpm python-tgext-crud.noarch: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Should probably have a readme and a copying file at the least -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] New: Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Summary: Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-catwalk.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-catwalk-2.0.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Catwalk is a database manipulation application built on top of TurboGears. With it you can easily interact with your application data model and manage your data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:47:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011947.n51JlpCr010731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #2 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-06-01 15:47:50 EDT --- No need to add the docs but upstream should be alerted -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011952.n51JqvM3002756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-sproxy - A package |python-sprox - A package |for creation of web widgets |for creation of web widgets |directly from database |directly from database |schema |schema -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] New: Review Request: python-sproxy - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sproxy - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Summary: Review Request: python-sproxy - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sprox.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sprox-0.5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Sprox is a widget generation library that has a slightly different take on the problem of creating custom web content directly from database schemas. Sprox provides an easy way to create forms for web content which are: automatically generated, easy to customize, and validated. Sprox also has powerful tools to help you display your content the way you want to with table and record viewers. Sprox provides a way to fill your widgets, whether they are forms or other content with customizable data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011956.n51Ju2ji012493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-01 15:56:01 EDT --- Can you please verify the md5sum of the 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 you are looking at? All of those licensing issues have been resolved. The LICENSE file now contains the full text of the GPLv2. You should have this file: md5sum 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 0eed1a7a66ce7d77895067e31e064445 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011956.n51JuBGp003634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 15:56:10 EDT --- xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 19:56:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 15:56:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906011956.n51JuH3e003680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 15:56:16 EDT --- xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503301] Review Request: vim-nerdtree - Tree File Browser for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012013.n51KDoDc007209@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503301 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:12:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:12:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012012.n51KC7mM006883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #3 from John (J5) Palmieri 2009-06-01 16:12:06 EDT --- * MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review.[1] Warning waved - Passes with one warning about docs - waved * MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . Pass * MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . Pass * MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Pass * MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Pass - MIT * MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] Pass * MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.[4] Pass - No license file included in tarball * MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] Pass * MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] Pass * MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Pass - md5sum 7dda7f32440bf74c2a9694bebdcf8a55 * MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] Pass * MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8] Pass - Noarch package * MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Pass * MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [12] Pass * MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] Pass * MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [14] Pass * MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] Pass * MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] Pass * MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] Pass * MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [24] Pass * MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] Pass * MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] Pass SHOULD Items: Items marked as SHOULD are things that the package (or reviewer) SHOULD do, but is not required to do. * SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] Please query upstream if you have the chance -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:13:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503300] Review Request: vim-c-support - C/C++ IDE for VIM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012013.n51KDSV3016452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503300 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012015.n51KFH5h007896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 John (J5) Palmieri changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] New: Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Summary: Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinxbase/sphinxbase.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/sphinxbase/sphinxbase-0.4.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Sphinxbase is a common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products. This package does not provide voice recognition capabilities by itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012039.n51Kd7lh021690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-01 16:39:06 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-rls-client Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:47:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:47:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503197] Review Request: moserial - Serial terminal for the gnome desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012047.n51Kl6Lw014415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503197 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Terje R??sten 2009-06-01 16:47:04 EDT --- Import, built and pushed to bodhi for rawhide and Fedora 11. Turns out moserial needs gtk >= 2.14.0 leaving Fedora < 11 out. If anyone needs it elsewhere, please open a new ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 20:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 16:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012054.n51Ksfvj024884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #48 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-01 16:54:39 EDT --- I want to inform you, that blender-2.49 will available in rawhide in the next days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 21:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012105.n51L5juZ018503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Requrest: stxxl - |Review Request: stxxl - C++ |C++ STL drop-in replacement |STL drop-in replacement for |for extremely large |extremely large datasets |datasets | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 21:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012104.n51L4sno018107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 --- Comment #4 from Dan Atmakin 2009-06-01 17:04:53 EDT --- This is a package for emacs and in emacs pattern, this package is absolutely all-sufficient and does not requires any special jars for correct work. Only preinstalled jre (sun or another, it does not matter). I don't know how JDE work in xemacs. sorry but this srpm is rather ugly. I will recreate it according with /Packaging/Emacs#GNU_Emacs guidelines. I can't do it immediately, but i'll try to fix all problems in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 21:20:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:20:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012120.n51LK0k8020731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lemenkov at gmail.com |denis.arnaud_fedora at m4x.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 21:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012133.n51LXhp3023105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-01 17:33:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 21:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012135.n51LZ9LP001270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: bastet - An |Review Request: bastet - An |evil Tetris like game |evil falling bricks game --- Comment #2 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-01 17:35:08 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet-0.43-2.fc11.src.rpm - Removed reference to Tetris to match our guidelines -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 21:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 17:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012148.n51Lmanx025598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #11 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-01 17:48:34 EDT --- i will do review today/tommorow, but so far it looks good, i will test if it works correctly on my system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 22:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012214.n51ME2Cx030370@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #18 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-01 18:14:00 EDT --- That's fine, if you like, I shall be honoured to go on with the review (thanks Peter and Michael!). As for the failing build on Fedora 9, I just forgot to enclose the 'BuildArch: noarch' directive within the '%if 0%{?fedora} >= 10 [...] %endif' condition... It now works well, as Koji shows: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1388361 Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/7/stxxl.spec (as well as the corresponding Source RPM: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/7/stxxl-1.2.1-7.fc10.src.rpm) As I have changed only the BuildArch directive, it does not imply any change on Fedora 10, 11 and 12. So, if you agree with that new version, I shall approve the package. ---------------- As for the build system, I proposed to ADD a new one, not to replace the existing one. Hence, (part of) the upstream team may still work with their current building system, if they are happy with it (though I do not understand how they install that library, since there is apparently no such possibility in the current build system!). And an additional GNU Autotools build system would allow (plenty of) other developers to build, install and package in a standard way, without too much maintenance. That is simply what I suggested, and see no reason why the upstream team should be against. Without such a standard build system, it means that, as the main maintainer of the package, you will have more work every time a new upstream will be released. But, that is my $0.02, and as far as I understand, it should not interfere with Fedora packaging :) --------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 22:52:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:52:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012252.n51MqFpo013924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 18:52:15 EDT --- globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 22:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012252.n51MqB0h013890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 18:52:10 EDT --- globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 22:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012252.n51Mq6ba003823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-01 18:52:05 EDT --- globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 22:58:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:58:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503616] New: Review Request: sk1 - vector graphics editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sk1 - vector graphics editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503616 Summary: Review Request: sk1 - vector graphics editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: awilliam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/sk1/sk1.spec SRPM URL: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/sk1/sk1-0.9.1-0.1.737.aw_fc11.src.rpm Description: sK1 is a vector graphics editor, something of a successor (though not official) to Skencil (aka Sketch), which went dormant back in 2006. sk1 is actively updated and quite popular. It was requested in the forum package request thread, put up on the wiki by Rahul: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_Survey_May_2009 the package is based on my Mandriva package, which has been in MDV for a while and used by several people. rpmlint gives a warning about the version in the changelog (which I think is bogus, it's correct not to put the %dist tag into the changelog version I think...), and an error that __init__.py is not executable, which I don't believe it's supposed to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 22:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 18:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] New: Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-f?= =?utf-8?q?onts_-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) scrip Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: senamirmir-washra-fonts - Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) scrip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Summary: Review Request: senamirmir-washra-fonts - Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) scrip Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/senamirmir-washra-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/senamirmir-washra-fonts-4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: A set of high quality unicode fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script published by the Senamirmir project. They can be used to write Ethiopic and Eritrean languages (Amharic, Blin, Ge?ez, Harari, Me?en, Tigre, Tigrinya?). See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Senamirmir_WashRa_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 1 23:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 19:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906012300.n51N0QYk005189@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-01 19:00:25 EDT --- oh...crap. i didn't realize someone else had done this :(. here's my take: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503616 i did say on the list i'd do this one...sigh. peter: I think we try to avoid unnecessary capitalization, right? that's why I used sk1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 01:49:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 21:49:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020149.n521n59V014681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #30 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-01 21:49:04 EDT --- Hi, Zarko kradio4 4.0.0 final is out! SPEC: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/kradio4.spec SRPMS: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/fedora/kradio4-4.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm This is the full version, which also creates a kradio4-internetradio: SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~pcavalcanti/specs/kradio4.spec SRPMS: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/kradio4-4.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm I am looking forward for your final comments too. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 02:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501576] Review Request: python-repoze-what-quickstart - A plugin enabling a simple authentication system with repoze.who and repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020203.n5223ROH009010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501576 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com Bug 501576 depends on bug 501566, which changed state. Bug 501566 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-friendlyform - Collection of repoze.who friendly form plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501566 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-06-01 22:03:26 EDT --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-quickstart.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-quickstart-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm * Sun May 31 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0-2 - s/python-repoze-who-plugins-sql/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 02:05:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:05:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468804] Review Request: python-tg-devtools - Development tools and templates for TurboGears2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020205.n522566Q009609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468804 --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-06-01 22:05:04 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-devtools-2.0-4.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tg-devtools.spec * Mon Jun 01 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0-4 - Conditionally require python-sqlite2 * Mon Jun 01 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0-3 - Require python-catwalk * Mon Jun 01 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0-2 - Require python-repoze-who-testutil * Sun May 31 2009 Luke Macken - 2.0-1 - Update to 2.0 final - Sync our requirements - Remove the setuptools wsgiref patch - Disable unit tests until Catwalk is packaged * Tue Oct 28 2008 Luke Macken - 1.9.7-0.2.a4 - Swap out tg.ext.repoze.who for tgext.authorization -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 02:09:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:09:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479020] Review Request: python-repoze-who-plugins-sa - The repoze.who SQLAlchemy plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020209.n5229EEN010062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479020 Bug 479020 depends on bug 499483, which changed state. Bug 499483 Summary: Review Request: python-repoze-who-testutil - Test utilities for repoze.who-powered applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499483 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2009-06-01 22:09:13 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-plugins-sa-1.0-0.2.rc1.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-who-plugins-sa.spec * Thu May 21 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0-0.2.rc1 - Update to 1.0rc1 - Add python-elixir, python-sqlalchemy, python-coverage, python-nose, and python-repoze-who to the BuildRequires - Remove the setuptools patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 02:18:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:18:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020218.n522IMNe021896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #4 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-06-01 22:18:18 EDT --- *** Bug 503616 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 02:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 22:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503616] Review Request: sk1 - vector graphics editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020218.n522IKXd021853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503616 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-06-01 22:18:18 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 502926 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 03:13:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:13:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020313.n523DlBV003853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 03:25:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2009 23:25:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020325.n523PGkV006947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 --- Comment #4 from Silas Sewell 2009-06-01 23:25:15 EDT --- Generally I don't like to rename stuff like this because it can break tutorials and such, but this is probably fine. SRPM Url: http://silassewell.googlecode.com/files/python-line_profiler-1.0-0.3.b2.fc10.src.rpm SPEC Diff: http://code.google.com/p/silassewell/source/diff?spec=svn281&r=281&format=side&path=/trunk/projects/packages/rpms/python-line_profiler/python-line_profiler.spec rpmlint [silas at silas rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-10-i386/result/*.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 04:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] New: Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Summary: Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aalam at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://aalam.fedorapeople.org/punjabi-fonts/saab/saab-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://aalam.fedorapeople.org/punjabi-fonts/saab/saab-fonts-0.91-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package provides a free OpenType Punjabi (Gurmukhi) font. Developed by Bhupinder Singh. http://guca.sourceforge.net/typography/fonts/saab/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 04:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 00:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020410.n524A5OU007911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525R9Xo032743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Bug 462711 depends on bug 461139, which changed state. Bug 461139 Summary: Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525R8EL032705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #38 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:27:03 EDT --- Its almost 7 months and no reply from submitter, I will close this review now. Anyone interested please submit new package review. Subodh, If you are still following this review and want to package this, submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525Rojt022917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462711] Review Request: Mothanna-fonts - Mothanna-fonts from Arabeyes.org In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525RYaM022830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462711 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(440volt.tux at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #8 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:27:32 EDT --- Its almost 7 months and no reply from submitter, I will close this review now. Anyone interested please submit new package review. Subodh, If you are still following this review and want to package this, submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461139] Review Request: arabeyes-thabit-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020527.n525RxtE000412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466193] Review Request: alee-fonts - Korean TrueType Fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020530.n525UNN7000996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466193 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(smallvil at get9.net | |) | --- Comment #6 from Parag 2009-06-02 01:30:21 EDT --- Its almost 8 months and no reply from submitter, I will close this review now. Anyone interested please submit new package review. Smallvil, If you are still following this review and want to package this, submit updated package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 05:53:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 01:53:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] New: Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 Summary: Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rayvd at bludgeon.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy.spec SRPM: http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/python-webpy/python-webpy-0.31-1.src.rpm Description: web.py is a web framework for python that is as simple as it is powerful. web.py is in the public domain; you can use it for whatever purpose with absolutely no restrictions. Note: - The source package contains no documentation. I can provide a README.Fedora if needed pointing to upstream's web-based docs. - The source package provides no licensing information. I will ask upstream to provide this, but per this[1], the software is in the public domain. [1] http://webpy.org/changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020718.n527ICfX021675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #8 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 03:18:11 EDT --- I have problem with build under F-9: ----------------------------------------------- g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o easystroke actiondb.o actions.o annotate.o composite.o dbus-server.o fire.o gesture.o grabber.o main.o prefdb.o prefs.o shape.o stats.o util.o water.o win.o stroke.o gui.o desktop.o version.o -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -lboost_serialization -lXtst `pkg-config gtkmm-2.4 dbus-glib-1 --libs` stroke.o: In function `stroke_compare': /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:191: undefined reference to `step.3612' /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:199: undefined reference to `step.3612' /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:187: undefined reference to `step.3612' /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:195: undefined reference to `step.3612' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make: *** [easystroke] Error 1 ------------------------------------------------ Any idea how resolving this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020722.n527M7rW012066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 03:22:05 EDT --- 1) can you put complete download url as http://downloads.sourceforge.net/ayttm/ayttm-0.5.0-89.zip 2) exclude .la files also by removing following from %files %{_libdir}/ayttm/*.la 3) can you use desktop-file-install to install desktop files as given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#desktop-file-install_usage 4) don't add following to %files %{_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/ayttm.mo instead use http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines#Handling_Locale_Files 5) you don't need Requires: gdb Requires: gtk2 >= 2.12.0 Requires: glib2 >= 2.0.0 6) drop versions from BuildRequires: gtk2-devel >= 2.12.0 BuildRequires: glib2-devel >= 2.0.0 7) remove unnecessary things from SPEC like # If you want stripped RPM with no crash dialog use # --define "nodebug 1" in rpmbuild commandline %if "%{nodebug}" != "1" %define nodebug 0 %endif AND %if "%{nodebug}" == "0" %define optflags -g %ifnarch x86_64 # x86_64 does not have brp-compress %define __spec_install_post %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress %endif %endif %define debug_package %{nil} 8) also %build should contain only %configure --enable-smtp --enable-jasper-filter --sysconfdir=%{_sysconfdir} 9) Use following in %install to preserve timestamps if any need to be make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" 10) You have missing BR: openssl-devel, jasper-devel, esound-devel 11) upstream naming looks odd that uses release numbers also. 12) also we need patch to port spell checker from pspell to hunspell in configure.ac -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020732.n527W886013989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #31 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 03:32:06 EDT --- Let's do some cosmetics: 1) Move out these and correct other spec code to works without these definitions: ------------------------------- #define rel snapshot-2009-05-31-r889 #define rel2 0.12.r889.20090531 %define rel %{version} %define rel2 1 -------------------------------- * 2) Comment included %patch0 and %source1 files! 3) %setup line can be: %setup -q -a 1 4) %cmake can be: %cmake_kde4 5) after removing %define lines you must change: cp -R %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{rel}/html/* \ to cp -R %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/* \ 6) .desktop file do not contain mimetype key, so we can now remove these lines from %post and %postun: update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : (This is my mistake ;) ) 7) Maybe the most important thing! Are you sure that we can make package for internet radio as a nonfree package, and just install them to Kradio works properly, without need to rebuild (compile) Kradio4 with needed BR: -devel packages??? Because, if we must build Kradio4 package with nonfree -devel dependencies, than Kradio4 must fo to RPM Fusion for full functionality. I ask because I saw that builder, at configure time ask for these nonfree devel dependencies... Can you chack this on some way? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:41:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:41:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020741.n527fiID026822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 03:41:43 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.4-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/easystroke-0.4.4-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 07:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 03:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020741.n527foi7016375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 03:41:49 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.4-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/easystroke-0.4.4-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 08:24:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:24:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020824.n528OKhP026390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 04:24:02 EDT --- ytree-1.92-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ytree-1.92-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 08:35:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:35:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020835.n528Z1As007606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 04:34:59 EDT --- + koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1388894 + rpmlint is silent - seems /usr/share/fonts/saab is created twice so remove following line from SPEC %dir %{_fontdir} + verified upstream source as aa8a32819d51b701a1d45a674d17432937f06ac3 saab.0.91.zip + Otherwise following fonts packaging guidelines. Should: 1) SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 08:53:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020853.n528rflV012518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 04:53:39 EDT --- As you are more confident enough about your packaging I am approving this based on comment#2. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 08:57:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 04:57:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502191] Review Request: chromium-bsu - Fast paced, arcade-style, top-scrolling space shooter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020857.n528vWRX003171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502191 Bug 502191 depends on bug 501323, which changed state. Bug 501323 Summary: Please update ftgl to 2.1.3rc5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501323 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020901.n5291naN015049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from A S Alam 2009-06-02 05:01:37 EDT --- Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020903.n5293cOC004837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-02 05:03:37 EDT --- Parag, thanks for your review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Crypt-GPG Short Description: Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG Owners: robert Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020904.n5294CTv015732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #3 from A S Alam 2009-06-02 05:04:11 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: saab-fonts Short Description: Punjabi OTF fonts Owners: aalam Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player (This is my first package-sponsor needed!) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020917.n529HwML008326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 Joel Andres Granados changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020917.n529Hjph019093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 490210, which changed state. Bug 490210 Summary: Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player (This is my first package-sponsor needed!) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:17:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player (This is my first package-sponsor needed!) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020917.n529HiA9019040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 Joel Andres Granados changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |jgranado at redhat.com Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #12 from Joel Andres Granados 2009-06-02 05:17:42 EDT --- I'd like to explore the possibility of moc in fedora. I like it quite a lot :). My proposal srpm is in http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/packages/moc/moc-2.5.0-1.fc10.src.rpm. I need to address a little issue with the initial configuration, after which I will post a new srpm and spec file. In the mean time, I have a question regarding the deps: What happens if a fedora package has a dependency on a rpmfusion package. I think some moc plugins are in rpmfusion. Does this mean that moc belongs in rpmfusion? If moc is in rpmfusion, will it have a place in bugzilla? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020932.n529W7oY022434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-02 05:32:06 EDT --- Just a note: for Fedora, the Automatic updates should be turned off by default. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 09:58:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 05:58:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906020958.n529w7bg017442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 05:58:06 EDT --- ytree-1.92-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ytree-1.92-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 10:06:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021006.n52A6bxR030628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #32 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 06:06:35 EDT --- > > 4) %cmake can be: %cmake_kde4 I was already using %cmake_kde4. Where did you see only %cmake?? > > 5) after removing %define lines you must change: > > cp -R %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{rel}/html/* \ > to > cp -R %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/html/* \ > > 6) .desktop file do not contain mimetype key, so we can now remove these lines > from %post and %postun: > > update-desktop-database &> /dev/null || : > > (This is my mistake ;) ) > > 7) Maybe the most important thing! > > Are you sure that we can make package for internet radio as a nonfree package, > and just install them to Kradio works properly, without need to rebuild > (compile) Kradio4 with needed BR: -devel packages??? > > Because, if we must build Kradio4 package with nonfree -devel dependencies, > than Kradio4 must fo to RPM Fusion for full functionality. > > I ask because I saw that builder, at configure time ask for these nonfree devel > dependencies... It checks for them, but the build goes just fine this way. > > Can you chack this on some way? Well, I am using kradio4 exactly this way. I built and installed the Fedora package, and then installed only the internet radio package. It is working just fine. I made all the modifications, but I kept the release as 1, If you do not mind, because I would like to deploy the Fedora package using 1 for its first release. For now I only update the Fedora package. Same URLS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 10:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021021.n52ALW8J023502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #19 from D Haley 2009-06-02 06:21:29 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-8.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint: $ rpmlint stxxl.spec ../SRPMS/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm ..//RPMS/i386/stxxl-devel-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-doc-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm ../RPMS/i386/stxxl-debuginfo-1.2.1-8.fc10.i386.rpm 5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji: F9:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389134 F10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389156 F11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389127 I removed the noarch entirely, as my rpm does not support this directive per sub-package, but rather attempts to provide it across all packages. This causes rpmlint to be annoyed about libs in a noarch package. The wiki says that this feature is coming *soon* but is not here yet, but maybe both it and I are out of date?: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages So here is my revision. The only difference from -7 is the removal of the noarch directive. With regards to the build system, at this time it is more work to make it autoconf friendly than to just keep the current "system" chugging along. Maybe next release :-). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 10:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 06:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021053.n52ArdYN009755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com --- Comment #54 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-06-02 06:53:33 EDT --- As cairo maintainer denying to include XKB support into main cairo package, what if cairo-experimental package will be made to include those such extensions like XKB? It can work in two ways: 1. Rename library to libcairo-experimental.so, and link awesome against it. But here is high risk that both cairo libraries will be loaded. 2. Put libcairo.so to an alternative path like /usr/lib/cairo-expermental and add it to ld.so search path so it loaded instead of main cairo. (freetype-freeworld in RPM Fusion work this way.) This way it will override system cairo. I?m inclined to try second way. What do you think about it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 11:14:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:14:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021114.n52BE8E9014100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 07:14:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I have problem with build under F-9: > > ----------------------------------------------- > g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector > --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -o easystroke actiondb.o > actions.o annotate.o composite.o dbus-server.o fire.o gesture.o grabber.o > main.o prefdb.o prefs.o shape.o stats.o util.o water.o win.o stroke.o gui.o > desktop.o version.o -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions > -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic > -lboost_serialization -lXtst `pkg-config gtkmm-2.4 dbus-glib-1 --libs` > stroke.o: In function `stroke_compare': > /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:191: undefined reference to > `step.3612' > /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:199: undefined reference to > `step.3612' > /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:187: undefined reference to > `step.3612' > /builddir/build/BUILD/easystroke-0.4.4/stroke.c:195: undefined reference to > `step.3612' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make: *** [easystroke] Error 1 > ------------------------------------------------ > > Any idea how resolving this? Not sure what's happening here. Also having no F9 installed machine now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 11:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021141.n52BfEIb020105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #33 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 07:41:11 EDT --- If you are using F10 x86_64, I have the packages here: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f10-x86_64/repoview/kradio4.html http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/myrpms-f10-x86_64/repoview/kradio4-internetradio.html The first one is the Fedora version. If you install just it, you will not be able to play internet stations. After installing the second one, you will. The first one was generated with mock, and no internetradio package was created in the process. The second one was created using the full .src.rpm. This is the build log of the Fedora package: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/temp/build.log As you can see, no ffmpeg or libmms available, but the combination of the two packages gives us the full functionality. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 11:52:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:52:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021152.n52Bqpvn011538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #34 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 07:52:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > > > > 4) %cmake can be: %cmake_kde4 > > I was already using %cmake_kde4. Where did you see only %cmake?? I'm talking about drop parameters right from %cmake_kde4 (path parameter in this case ;) ) > > I ask because I saw that builder, at configure time ask for these nonfree devel > > dependencies... > > It checks for them, but the build goes just fine this way. Yes, but how you know that compiler, if do not find headers from these -devel dependencies, will not compile an essential part of the code that allows the later use of codes from run-time dependencies? > Well, I am using kradio4 exactly this way. I built and installed the Fedora > package, and then installed only the internet radio package. It is working just > fine. OK then, it will be enough :) > > For now I only update the Fedora package. Same URLS. This is OK, because this bug thread isn't for debating about forbidden staff. These we can discuss on RPM Fusion, when you prepare package ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 11:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 07:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021156.n52Bu55j012527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #35 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 07:56:04 EDT --- (In reply to comment #33) > > As you can see, no ffmpeg or libmms available, but the combination of the two > packages gives us the full functionality. OK, sorry on bothering but this is important thing to clean up before build package for Fedora repo... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:11:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:11:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021211.n52CBGp7027085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #36 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 08:11:15 EDT --- I checked once again your spec and now looks good :) (for nonfree package please send me a link to RPM Fusion.) Now, I APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021211.n52CBUWO027150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021213.n52CDC3o016577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #37 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 08:13:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > (In reply to comment #33) > > > > As you can see, no ffmpeg or libmms available, but the combination of the two > > packages gives us the full functionality. > > > OK, sorry on bothering but this is important thing to clean up before build > package for Fedora repo... No. The test was really necessary. That is why I used mock for makeing sure there was no trace of either ffmpeg or libmms during the build. And you are right. The parameter following %cmake_kde4 is not really necessary. Removed (same URLS). The only thing is that the versions and releases must be the same for Fedora and rpmfusion. That is why I want to start in 1, so I can keep track in my mind where we begun, without having to look in the changelog section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:15:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:15:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021215.n52CFYcu028188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #38 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 08:15:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #36) > I checked once again your spec and now looks good :) > (for nonfree package please send me a link to RPM Fusion.) > > Now, I APPROVED. Thanks a lot for all your help! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:23:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:23:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021223.n52CNY8D018670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #39 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 08:23:33 EDT --- KRadio4 is a great program and it deserve to be in fedora repo ;) BTW, do you maybe want to review my packages of btnx and btnx-conf programs? (daemon for using more than three mouse buttons) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503727] New: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503727 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cmpi-dhcp - SBLIM WBEM-SMT DHCP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-dhcp/sblim-cmpi-dhcp.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cmpi-dhcp/sblim-cmpi-dhcp-0.5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The cmpi-dhcp package provides access to the DHCP configuration data via CIMOM technology/infrastructure. It contains the DHCP CIM Model, CMPI Provider with the DHCP task specific Resource Access. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021228.n52CScMI031180@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #12 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 08:28:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > Any idea how resolving this? > > Not sure what's happening here. Also having no F9 installed machine now. Never mind, if I'll not resolve that, then nothing of F-9 branch (for a couple of days it will be obsolete) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021240.n52CeQg9001719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #40 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 08:40:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > KRadio4 is a great program and it deserve to be in fedora repo ;) > > BTW, do you maybe want to review my packages of btnx and btnx-conf programs? > (daemon for using more than three mouse buttons) > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Of course. I have been using imwheel for a similar purpose, but it is currently unmaintained. Maybe it is time for getting a replacement ... Just give some time to install and learn how to use the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021250.n52ColwZ004805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-02 08:50:44 EDT --- Sorry Zach, but could you update to cabal2spec-0.16 which is now in f11-updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 12:53:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 08:53:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021253.n52CrZTh005282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021310.n52DAuWq010044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 --- Comment #41 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 09:10:55 EDT --- CVS Request must looks like this: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kradio4 Short Description: V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 Owners: your FAS name Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: your FAC name and fedora-cvs flag MUST set to: ? (not to plus sign, plus sign will give CVS admin) please, correct this... Look here for details: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:26:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:26:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021326.n52DQkJS014209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #20 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-02 09:26:44 EDT --- > I removed the noarch entirely, as my rpm does not support this > directive per sub-package, It works in Fedora 10 (RPM 4.6.0) and above. > This causes rpmlint to be annoyed about libs in a noarch package. rpmlint must be new enough: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2946 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:35:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021335.n52DZMvJ006503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #42 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 09:35:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kradio4 Short Description: V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 Owners: roma Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: roma Thanks Zarko. I must have a full night of sleep ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:41:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:41:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021341.n52Dfddr018529@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-02 09:41:37 EDT --- Sorry update to cabal2spec-0.16 or later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] New: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Summary: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The SSH library with -Full C library functions for manipulating a client-side SSH connection -Fully configurable sessions -Support for AES-128,AES-192,AES-256,blowfish, in cbc mode -use multiple SSH connections in a same process, at same time. -usable SFTP implementation -Public key and password authentication -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021349.n52Dn7Cq010646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021351.n52DpwWx022395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 09:51:57 EDT --- python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021352.n52Dq45L022436@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 09:52:03 EDT --- python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021349.n52DnSOB021375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:48:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:48:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021348.n52DmnfQ021210@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |230182 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021349.n52DnDcc021305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-06-02 09:49:11 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-2.0-2.el5.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2.spec * Mon Jun 01 2009 Luke Macken 2.0-2 - Conditionally include wsgiref * Sun May 31 2009 Luke Macken 2.0-1 - Update to 2.0 final. - Add python-repoze-what-pylons and python-webflash to the BuildRequires - Disable the test suite until we package chameleon.genshi * Tue Oct 28 2008 Luke Macken 1.9.7.0.3.b1dev.r5627 - Update to a svn snapshot to support tgext.authorization instead of tg.ext.repoze.who -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021351.n52DpED3011682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 09:51:13 EDT --- python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:51:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:51:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021351.n52DpJkc011734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 09:51:18 EDT --- python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 13:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 09:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021358.n52Dwrp9013792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2009-06-02 09:58:52 EDT --- Since all of the MUST items have passed, is this package approved? I will contact upstream (Chris Percious) about adding the license file to the tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021400.n52E0abu025501@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-02 10:00:35 EDT --- What's the difference between this library and that one: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libssh2/ ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021417.n52EHG1E030392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:17:14 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021417.n52EHMXU030448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.5-2.fc11 |1.5.5-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:15:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021415.n52EFZPj029867@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5.5-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021416.n52EGpQo030260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.10-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:15:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:15:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021415.n52EFT9v018938@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:15:27 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021418.n52EIAxw019921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:18:07 EDT --- perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:16:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:16:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021416.n52EGl6s019437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:16:45 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021418.n52EI1W7019868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021418.n52EIFFe019973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.10-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021419.n52EJdLE020365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:19:35 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-0.3.rc2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openttd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5730 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:21:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:21:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021421.n52EL8AZ032226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:21:07 EDT --- perl-Catalyst-View-Email-0.13-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021417.n52EHtOx030833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:17:53 EDT --- mulk-0.4.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:20:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021420.n52EKOhL031927@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:20:23 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021421.n52ELLWH032310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:21:20 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021420.n52EKUP6032023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.99.5-11.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021420.n52EKcES032088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:20:37 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update dssi-vst'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-5736 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:20:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:20:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021420.n52EKBCD031745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:20:09 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dssi-vst'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5732 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021421.n52ELn2e032461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:21:48 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update agedu'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5743 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021421.n52ELi56032426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:21:40 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-what'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5742 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021421.n52ELWTl021749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.99.5-11.fc9 |0.99.5-11.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500283] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-Email - Send Email from Catalyst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021421.n52ELDqh021637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.13-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:27:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:27:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021427.n52ERRTg003132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #41 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:27:25 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021427.n52ERXdB003237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.7-4.fc9 |0.9.7-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021426.n52EQrEC002939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:26:52 EDT --- perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath-0.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:26:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:26:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499102] Review Request: perl-HTML-TreeBuilder-XPath - Add XPath support to HTML::TreeBuilder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021426.n52EQwEf002973@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499102 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.10-1.fc11 |0.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021425.n52EPr7G002584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.7-4.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021425.n52EPjT1023764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:25:43 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021427.n52ERpsj024426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:27:49 EDT --- python-feedcache-1.3-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-feedcache-1.3-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:26:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:26:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021426.n52EQjsB024204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:26:43 EDT --- python-repoze-what-1.0.8-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-repoze-what'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5753 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:32:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:32:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021432.n52EWAAh005975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5.5-2.fc9 |1.5.5-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:32:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:32:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021432.n52EWZ4L006076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.3-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021430.n52EUVkm005334@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:32:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:32:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021432.n52EWUAU026387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:32:29 EDT --- globus-io-6.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021432.n52EW4Gr026216@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:32:03 EDT --- rabbitmq-server-1.5.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021432.n52EWJcl026329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:32:17 EDT --- rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021434.n52EYYNM026946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:34:33 EDT --- mulk-0.4.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:30:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:30:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021430.n52EUCiJ025429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:34:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:34:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503754] New: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503754 Summary: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The SSH library with -Full C library functions for manipulating a client-side SSH connection -Fully configurable sessions -Support for AES-128,AES-192,AES-256,blowfish, in cbc mode -use multiple SSH connections in a same process, at same time. -usable SFTP implementation -Public key and password authentication -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503753] New: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503753 Summary: Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/libssh/libssh-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The SSH library with -Full C library functions for manipulating a client-side SSH connection -Fully configurable sessions -Support for AES-128,AES-192,AES-256,blowfish, in cbc mode -use multiple SSH connections in a same process, at same time. -usable SFTP implementation -Public key and password authentication -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021437.n52Eb7ut008734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 --- Comment #3 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-06-02 10:37:04 EDT --- The libssh has different API. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021432.n52EWvso006528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:32:56 EDT --- globus-io-6.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:37:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:37:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021437.n52Ebesg009084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:37:39 EDT --- perl-App-Nopaste-0.10-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:35:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:35:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021435.n52EZV6n008021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:35:30 EDT --- xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021433.n52EX1ET006703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.3-1.fc11 |6.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501134] Review Request: rubygem-mongrel_cluster - GemPlugin wrapper for the mongrel HTTP server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021434.n52EYnTw007258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501134 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:34:48 EDT --- rubygem-mongrel_cluster-1.0.5-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021434.n52EYdX0007207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.1-2.fc9 |0.4.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021433.n52EX83b006818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:33:08 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dssi-vst'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5791 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021436.n52EaW0C008494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:36:30 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-0.3.rc2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openttd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5810 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021433.n52EXdTt006976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021436.n52EaeA3028547@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-02 10:36:38 EDT --- *** Bug 503754 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021438.n52Ec2Te029110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:38:01 EDT --- globus-io-6.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491758] Review Request: mingw32-opensc - MingGW Windows OpenSC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021436.n52EahXY028586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491758 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:36:41 EDT --- mingw32-opensc-0.11.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478921] Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021438.n52Ec7Bu029164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.3-1.fc10 |6.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:35:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:35:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501006] Review Request: xine-ui - A skinned xlib-based gui for xine-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021435.n52EZaRP028111@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501006 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.99.5-11.fc11 |0.99.5-11.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:35:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:35:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021435.n52EZIET027939@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:35:18 EDT --- mulk-0.4.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497948] Review Request: mulk - Non-interactive multi-connection network downloader with image filtering and Metalink support. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021435.n52EZNRZ027981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497948 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.1-2.fc10 |0.4.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:36:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:36:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503754] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021436.n52EadeQ028509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503754 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-02 10:36:38 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 503742 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:37:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498147] Review Request: perl-App-Nopaste - Easy access to any pastebin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021437.n52EbjYn009163@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498147 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.10-2.fc10 |0.10-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021437.n52Ebrx7009382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 10:37:52 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update agedu'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021440.n52Ee9e8030544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #11 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 10:40:08 EDT --- I apparently jumped the gun on my previous post. The project was scheduled to release and upstream was nice enough to provide me with the source to package pre-release but it turns out that there were a couple things fixed between the "3.3.0" version I was given and the official 3.3.0 release. The spec file hasn't changed any because the only thing that changed was the source package (which has the same name). If there is a needed changelog entry for this I will happily add one, just couldn't find any real reason to add since the changelog already entered was technically for this release. The optflags appear to be honored with the official release. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.3.0-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:54:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:54:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021454.n52EsWT1015392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-06-02 10:54:31 EDT --- I just did an upstream release that now contains a LICENSE.txt, and I also added the MIT license header to all of the python modules. http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery-0.9.4.3-1.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery.spec * Tue Jun 02 2009 Luke Macken - 0.9.4.3-1 - Latest upstream release * Mon Jun 01 2009 Luke Macken - 0.9.4.2-1 - Update to 0.9.4.2 - Require python-tw-forms -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 14:57:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 10:57:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021457.n52EvD5p016401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-02 10:57:11 EDT --- + GOOD: rpmlint is silent on both source and binary package. + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + GOOD: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + GOOD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - GOOD: LICENSE file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + GOOD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. 8a76c03579a3e27046e6bafe88ffd171 + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build is https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389496 + GOOD: builds on all architectures + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. (builds in koji) + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK + GOOD: not relocatable + GOOD: A package owns all directories that it creates. + GOOD: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + GOOD: Each package consistently use macros. + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + GOOD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package. + GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage. + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021506.n52F6R3k018922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Jan F. Chadima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-06-02 11:06:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libssh Short Description: A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) Owners: jfch2222 Branches: F10 F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021515.n52FF8bj022680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 11:15:07 EDT --- mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481224] Review Request: rabbitmq-server - An AMQP server written in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021515.n52FFhUG022919@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481224 --- Comment #41 from Hubert Plociniczak 2009-06-02 11:15:42 EDT --- Thanks for help with the review, Peter! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:15:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:15:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021515.n52FFhO7022898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 11:15:42 EDT --- mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021516.n52FGMIl023117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 11:16:20 EDT --- mingw32-hunspell-1.2.8-6.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-hunspell-1.2.8-6.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021517.n52FH0gg010347@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Bernie Innocenti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |besfahbo at redhat.com --- Comment #55 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-06-02 11:16:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > As cairo maintainer denying to include XKB support into main cairo package, > what if cairo-experimental package will be made to include those such > extensions like XKB? It can work in two ways: XCB (the X Client Binding), not XKB (the X KeyBoard extension). > 1. Rename library to libcairo-experimental.so, and link awesome against it. But > here is high risk that both cairo libraries will be loaded. > > 2. Put libcairo.so to an alternative path like /usr/lib/cairo-expermental and > add it to ld.so search path so it loaded instead of main cairo. > (freetype-freeworld in RPM Fusion work this way.) This way it will override > system cairo. > > I?m inclined to try second way. What do you think about it? Sounds like a very crude kludge, but it would most probably work. Are you sure your time wouldn't be better spent reviewing cairo's XCB backend and determining what needs to be done in order to bring it on par with the libX11 backend? You could write a summary to both the XCB and Cairo lists, asking if one of the developers wants to help you out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:21:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:21:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021521.n52FL3qc011736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #4 from Luke Macken 2009-06-02 11:21:02 EDT --- * Tue Jun 02 2009 Luke Macken - 0.9.4.4-1 - Latest upstream release, which includes the license http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery-0.9.4.4-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476789] Review Request: python-repoze-what - Authorization for WSGI applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021546.n52FkPCX031738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476789 --- Comment #17 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-02 11:46:24 EDT --- > Requires: %{name}-%{version} Doesn't work as it cannot be resolved. Ought to be Requires: %{name} = %{version} although -doc/-docs subpackages typically don't need the main package at all. [...] Note that according to the guidelines, reviewers should _install_ a package at least and perform basic runtime tests. That would have caught this mistake. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021552.n52FqwvH022286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 --- Comment #2 from David Hannequin 2009-06-02 11:52:57 EDT --- Hi, Below links to new spec and srpm files : Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac/perl-Tk-ProgressBar-Mac-1.2-2.fc10.src.rpm And i sent an email to the upstream to specify the license. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 15:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 11:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021559.n52FxhAo003494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #6 from David Hannequin 2009-06-02 11:59:42 EDT --- Hi, I sent an email to the upstream to specify the license. For the moment I did not answer. Below links to new spec and srpm files : Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-Stderr/perl-Tk-Stderr.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/perl-Tk-Stderr/perl-Tk-Stderr-1.2-5.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 16:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021605.n52G5kDN026454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |503772 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 16:11:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:11:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021611.n52GBPvM028121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #1 from David Hannequin 2009-06-02 12:11:24 EDT --- Below links to new spec and srpm files : Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 16:26:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 12:26:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021626.n52GQaGk010805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-02 12:26:35 EDT --- Because I have APPROVED you package, it may be nice, if you can create a CVSAdmin Request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 17:07:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:07:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021707.n52H7vQl018414@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #13 from Kyle McMartin 2009-06-02 13:07:54 EDT --- I've ported this to use the utrace-ftrace support we currently have in Fedora... Is that acceptable for rawhide/F-12? I'll submit a patched srpm when I've done a bit more testing to make it somewhat more bulletproof. Thanks! Kyle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 17:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021718.n52HIiWj010385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 13:18:43 EDT --- rpmlint output: ophcrack.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Ophcrack ophcrack.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 1) ophcrack.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Ophcrack 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. - Fix these. Remove "Ophcrack is" from the summary. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is not "GPLv2+ and OpenSSL", it is "GPLv2+ with exceptions" MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - The makefile still uses its own linker flags, use make LFLAGS="%{optflags}" %{?_smp_mflags} to fix this. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Drop INSTALL as it only contains instructions for compilation. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. NEEDSWORK - Refer to packaging guidelines for proper desktop file installation. Also AFAIK Encoding is an obsolete line in desktop files. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 17:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021718.n52HIxSa021025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #21 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-02 13:18:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > It works in Fedora 10 (RPM 4.6.0) and above. Yes, of course, my version (1.2.1-7) works on Fedora 10 and above. I just shows the result of Koji for Fedora 9, as it was the only remaining non-working version. So, I suggest to keep the version 1.2.1-7 (or to have 1.2.1-9 version identical to the 1.2.1-7). Is that fine for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 17:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021725.n52HP4SM012336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |promac at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 13:25:03 EDT --- Hi, I am trying btnx, but according to the manual: http://www.ollisalonen.com/btnx/man/btnx-manual.html#troubleshoot-xorg section 12.2.1 "Most importantly, make sure you are not using the evdev driver." Isn't evdev the default since F10? Mouse and keyboard configuration are ignored in xorg.conf unless there is clause: Option "AutoAddDevices" "false" in the server flags section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 17:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021739.n52Hd5DQ016036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Bug 468230 depends on bug 503772, which changed state. Bug 503772 Summary: python-hashlib does not work with the Python2.4's hmac module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503772 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 17:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 13:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502686] Review Request: wsdlpull - C++ Web Services client library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021743.n52Hhwtc017450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502686 --- Comment #5 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-02 13:43:57 EDT --- The upstream team is happy with the packaging: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/wsdlpull/message/947 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:01:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:01:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021801.n52I1W5t001232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:11:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:11:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021811.n52IBIjC004209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-02 14:11:16 EDT --- *** Bug 503753 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503753] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021811.n52IBHx9004170@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503753 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-02 14:11:16 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 503742 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021817.n52IHDZ9026752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #26 from Gareth John 2009-06-02 14:17:12 EDT --- I have the spec for the software that uses this library done now. is it ready for approval? or is there still issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021824.n52IOAmA028621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #27 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 14:24:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > I have the spec for the software that uses this library done now. is it ready > for approval? or is there still issues? The package has to be reviewed first. I just went through the biggest problems that were visible straight away from the spec file. Also, you have to get sponsored in Fedora. Do you have any other submissions? Have you done reviews of other packages? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:30:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:30:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021830.n52IUoe0009833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #28 from Gareth John 2009-06-02 14:30:49 EDT --- well i've written another spec last night. It was a lot quicker and is a lot better than the first spec i wrote for this. I made this pkg as it was a dep for the package i wanted to build in the first place, as im fed up of compiling from src every time, thought i may as well submit it, got a better package from this process too. I can put that up for review, however it needs this package first? I've got nearly all BRs sorted in the other spec but as im testing for deps in mock it never gets passed GTKMM-UTILS and there is one more dep after it in configure i may be able to make an educated guess at that dep from a yum search and submit that for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:43:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:43:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503800] New: Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 Summary: Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sherry151 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085.spec: Release 2 spec file http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085-1.3.5-2.fc10.src.rpm: Release 2 SRPM Description: This is a graphical simulator for intel 8085 assembly language programs and has some nice features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:47:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:47:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503800] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021847.n52Il26e002123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://sourceforge.net/proj | |ects/gnusim8085/ CC| |sherry151 at gmail.com Platform|All |i386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 18:54:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 14:54:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021854.n52Isbxc003681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #13 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 14:54:36 EDT --- Fixed the areas where NEEDSWORK was tagged. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.3.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 19:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021912.n52JCNsk019160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #29 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 15:12:22 EDT --- Your new package can't be *built* in Fedora before this one is available in the repos. There's nothing to prevent the other package from being reviewed in the same time. You just have to make yourself a local mock repo to get this package available for the build of the second package. Key words in this are: mock configuration files and the createrepo tool. Remember that the mock configuration refers to the host OS since it's the host yum&rpm that install the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 19:15:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:15:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021915.n52JFvR3008843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 15:15:56 EDT --- Fix the rpmlint warnings as well. Also, you should make a comment about the need of the LFLAGS argument in %build, e.g. # The LFLAGS argument to make is needed since by default the linking uses # "-m64 -Wl,-O1" as linker flags instead of %{optflags}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 19:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021920.n52JKD5M009666@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|a.badger at gmail.com |palango at gmx.de --- Comment #20 from Paul Lange 2009-06-02 15:20:10 EDT --- OK Toshio, I'm taking this over. Mauricio: it's a good practice to try building packages in mock. It looks difficult at the beginning (I know this from my own experience) but helps you to create high-quality packages. For stepping in have a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/MockTricks With using mock you'll find out that you need to more build dependencies: * mono-debugger-devel instead of mono-debugger * mono-addins-devel Furthermore I would prefer to adjust the release number to a single number. The %defattr macro in %files should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) At the end it would be great if you could split out the *.pc file in a *-devel package. The rest looks really good and builds well. If we solve this last errors I'll do the full review. Thanks also to Ryan for creating the fixes! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 19:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500277] Review Request: fmit - Free Music Instrument Tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021939.n52Jdph4013881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500277 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-02 15:39:50 EDT --- I don't have such a problem here. Are you doing a plain rpmbuild build or a mock build? By the way, please don't use "--vendor fedora" for new packages. Also would you consider adding fmit to the list at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AudioCreation ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 19:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021952.n52Jqc3I016511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #15 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 15:52:37 EDT --- Taken care of the rpmlint warnings as well as added the LFLAGS justification. Spec URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack.spec SRPM URL: http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 19:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 15:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906021959.n52Jx2OK017562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #21 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-02 15:59:01 EDT --- Ok, Paul, thank for the sugestions, is going to take me a couple of days to try the mock thing (very bussy this week), but the rest of the changes may be tomorrow.. Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 20:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022010.n52KAO2b031124@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 --- Comment #1 from Jeremy Katz 2009-06-02 16:10:23 EDT --- Oh yeah, when we get this in and built, then we'll do the surgery both on the mkinitrd repo and package to remove the (then obvious) conflict -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 20:08:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:08:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] New: Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 Summary: Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: katzj at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/grubby/grubby.spec SRPM URL: http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/grubby/grubby-6.0.86-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: grubby is the command-line tool that manipulates bootloader config files Note: this is split out from the old mkinitrd package and thus has matching versioning. This might change. F11 has a separate binary package; with the push for dracut in F12 we will want a completely separate source package. This version also loses the nash dependence (yay!) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 20:35:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:35:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022035.n52KZ3FY026928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 --- Comment #3 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-02 16:35:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > > "Most importantly, make sure you are not using the evdev driver." > > Isn't evdev the default since F10? Mouse and keyboard configuration > are ignored in xorg.conf unless there is clause: > > Option "AutoAddDevices" "false" > > in the server flags section. Alas! That can be a big problem... But before analyzing this spec file, I'll contact upstream to investigate which problems can be produced from this btnx <-> evdev relationships.. If this issues are unsloving, then I'll close this bug threat and abandon package. In meanwhile, can you test btnx at your PC, because at my Fedora 10 it works fine. (xorg.conf is set up with Livna configuration manager, without these settings in Server flags section) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 20:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022054.n52KsfvI030515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org --- Comment #2 from Adam Goode 2009-06-02 16:54:40 EDT --- The original libtiff specfile has a lot of unnecessary stuff for mingw32. I just did one, it is attached. There is no need for executables, multilib, or documentation in the mingw32 version of libtiff. Please feel free to take this specfile and alter the changelog with your name, if you like. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 20:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022055.n52KtC93008003@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #3 from Adam Goode 2009-06-02 16:55:11 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346315) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346315) new specfile -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 20:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 16:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022057.n52KvBJT031332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #4 from Adam Goode 2009-06-02 16:57:10 EDT --- Also, in your version, the strict aliasing flag isn't working. The correct way to do it is in my specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022106.n52L63Hd000832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-02 17:06:03 EDT --- I installed btnx and btnx-config on F10, and could configure it. However, as I said, x is using evdev even if I add a mouse and keyboard session in xorg.conf. (==) Automatically adding devices (==) Automatically enabling devices (==) FontPath set to: catalogue:/etc/X11/fontpath.d, built-ins (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions/nvidia,/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/extensions,/usr/lib64/xorg/modules" (WW) AllowEmptyInput is on, devices using drivers 'kbd' or 'mouse' will be disabled. (WW) Disabling Keyboard0 (WW) Disabling Mouse0 The only way to avoid this, is using the flag I mentioned. But maybe it works with evdev. I will try to associate something to one of my mouse buttons. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player (This is my first package-sponsor needed!) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022119.n52LJwGj013295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 --- Comment #13 from Joel Andres Granados 2009-06-02 17:19:57 EDT --- I fiddled with it some more and I got a working install. SRPM: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/packages/moc/moc-2.5.0-1.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/packages/moc/moc.spec I'll revew the fedora review work flow to see what else needs to be done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022127.n52LRcCH015749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 Joel Andres Granados changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: moc - A |Review Request: moc - A |ncurses-based audio player |ncurses-based audio player |(This is my first | |package-sponsor needed!) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:30:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:30:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022130.n52LUQJc016543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-02 17:30:25 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022128.n52LSBsI015961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-02 17:28:10 EDT --- OK, everything should be now in order so that the package can be APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022133.n52LXHoM006302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-02 17:33:16 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022132.n52LW8k1006148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #43 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-02 17:32:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022144.n52Lijor018959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Adam Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Adam Miller 2009-06-02 17:44:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ophcrack Short Description: Free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables Owners: maxamillion Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022152.n52LqHWo010550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias|RussianFedora |RussianFedoraRemix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 22:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022200.n52M0bd4022111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 18:00:36 EDT --- perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 21:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022158.n52Lw22b021391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Tracker: packages from |Tracker: packages from |Russian Fedora |Russian Fedora Remix -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 22:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022202.n52M23x2022286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-02 18:02:03 EDT --- Package: perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Package: perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Package: perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete 2463 (perl-Crypt-GPG): Build on target fedora-5-epel succeeded. 2464 (perl-Crypt-GPG): Build on target fedora-4-epel succeeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 22:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 18:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022226.n52MQ6q3027315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 --- Comment #14 from Joel Andres Granados 2009-06-02 18:26:05 EDT --- Did some changes here and there. The srpm in comment 13 is no longer valid. SRPM: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/packages/moc/moc-2.5.0-1.20090602svn2151.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://jgranado.fedorapeople.org/packages/moc/moc.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 2 23:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 19:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906022347.n52Nll5W009715@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-02 19:47:46 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is clean. I thought I'd be able to fall back on the mkinitrd review, but it hasn't been completed yet and it looks like it has pretty much the same issues that this one does. So: Where does the tarball come from? I guess it's generated out of git somehow; if it's really not directly downloadable anywhere, some instructions on generating it would be good. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL There's a bit of weird formatting in the %description. I guess someone tried to fill it with a fixed right margin, so the word spacing is uneven. Not a blocker, but I thought I'd mention it. Really, the source thing is the only issue I see here. X can't compare source files match upstream. * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK (hopefully soon to go away anyway). * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. ? latest version is being packaged (can't t * BuildRequires are proper (shouldn't need pkgconfig, but it doesn't hurt). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: grubby = 6.0.86-1.fc11 grubby(x86-64) = 6.0.86-1.fc11 = /bin/bash /bin/sh libblkid.so.1()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libpopt.so.0()(64bit) * %check is present and all tests pass: 120 (100%) tests passed, 0 (0%) tests failed * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 00:47:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 20:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] New: Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Summary: Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gareth.l.john at googlemail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox.spec SRPM URL: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox-0.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Paperbox is a document browser. It lets you nicely view your ebooks, office and text documents and organise them by tags. Relying on Tracker, it is able to instantly discover all documents on your desktop, and present them in a convenient way. Tags and other metadata are shared across all Tracker-based applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 01:34:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 21:34:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503672] Review Request: python-webpy - A simple web framework for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030134.n531YNrN020591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503672 --- Comment #1 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-06-02 21:34:23 EDT --- Per the web.py mailing list, both concerns will be addressed in the 0.32 release (due out shortly). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 02:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030212.n532CO7O029587@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #24 from Ed Brand 2009-06-02 22:12:21 EDT --- Awesome, Yes, expect an update.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 02:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030230.n532Uvt6012185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 22:30:55 EDT --- xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 02:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 22:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030238.n532c1Cp004060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 22:38:00 EDT --- xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:02:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030302.n5332kps010763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 23:02:45 EDT --- xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503861] New: Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503861 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBICx-TestDatabase OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DBICx-TestDatabase.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DBICx-TestDatabase-0.02-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module creates a temporary SQLite database, deploys your DBIC schema, and then connects to it. This lets you easily test your DBIC schema. Since you have a fresh database for every test, you don't have to worry about cleaning up after your tests, ordering of tests affecting failure, etc. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390363 Additional Comment: This is a new testing BR of DBIx::Class::DateTime::Epoch. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030316.n533GIDP013952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #20 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-02 23:16:16 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030321.n533LHDe024387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:21:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:21:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030321.n533LEGU015166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #21 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-02 23:21:13 EDT --- With apologies for the severely delayed final review. *sigh* koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390372 Everything passed cleanly in the scratch build. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 00ffbef8967033ae1f51c6c13938bacc6cf3b323 Data-ObjectDriver-0.06.tar.gz 00ffbef8967033ae1f51c6c13938bacc6cf3b323 Data-ObjectDriver-0.06.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc12.noarch.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(Data::ObjectDriver) = 0.06 perl-Data-ObjectDriver = 0.06-3.fc12 perl(Data::ObjectDriver::BaseObject) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::BaseView) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::BaseCache) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::Apache) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::Cache) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::Memcached) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Cache::RAM) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::mysql) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::Oracle) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::Oracle::db) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::Pg) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD::SQLite) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBI) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::GearmanDBI) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::MultiPartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Multiplexer) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::Partition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::SimplePartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Errors) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Iterator) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Profiler) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::ResultSet) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL::Oracle) ====> requires for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc12.noarch.rpm perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(constant) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBD) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::MultiPartition) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Errors) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Iterator) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::ResultSet) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::SQL::Oracle) perl(DBI) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(List::Util) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Storable) perl(strict) perl(warnings) =====> perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc12.src.rpm perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) perl(Class::Data::Inheritable) perl(Class::Trigger) perl(DBD::SQLite) perl(DBI) perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) perl(Test::Exception) APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:28:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:28:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030328.n533SwqE026099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-02 23:28:57 EDT --- Koji (success) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390386 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:36:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:36:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030336.n533aBsi028181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:36:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:36:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030336.n533a95w028153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 --- Comment #7 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-02 23:36:08 EDT --- Hmm, interesting. I'm not seeing the "unstripped" warning you described; and I'm not worried about the "description too long" in the debuginfo package... not much we could do about that anyways. :) With apologies for the extremely long delay. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390386 Spec looks sane, clean and consistent; license is correct (GPL+ or Artistic); make test passes cleanly. Source tarballs match upstream (sha1sum): 2f82abee406d893e3938eb29b32f80d7b2b5cd8d JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05.tar.gz 2f82abee406d893e3938eb29b32f80d7b2b5cd8d JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05.tar.gz.srpm Final provides / requires are sane: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. =====> perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc12.ppc.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc12.ppc.rpm perl(JavaScript::Minifier::XS) = 0.05 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS = 0.05-2.fc12 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS(ppc-32) = 0.05-2.fc12 ====> requires for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc12.ppc.rpm libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) perl >= 0:5.006 perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(strict) perl(warnings) rtld(GNU_HASH) =====> perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc12.src.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc12.src.rpm ====> requires for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-0.05-2.fc12.src.rpm perl(JavaScript::Minifier) perl(Module::Build) perl(Test::More) perl(Test::Pod) =====> perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo-0.05-2.fc12.ppc.rpm <===== ====> rpmlint perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo.ppc: E: description-line-too-long This package provides debug information for package perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. ====> provides for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo-0.05-2.fc12.ppc.rpm perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo = 0.05-2.fc12 perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo(ppc-32) = 0.05-2.fc12 ====> requires for perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS-debuginfo-0.05-2.fc12.ppc.rpm APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:36:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:36:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030336.n533aFQo018235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-02 23:36:14 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dssi-vst-0.8-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030347.n533lXts021081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #5 from A S Alam 2009-06-02 23:47:32 EDT --- Thanks a lot. Package is build for devel and F-11. It is available on koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:44:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:44:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503861] Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030344.n533imVl020365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503861 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 23:44:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390363 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 16935864a5ef035a506c1a03537540b79afa3b70 DBICx-TestDatabase-0.02.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=13, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.47 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.57 CPU) + Package perl-DBICx-TestDatabase-0.02-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(DBICx::TestDatabase) = 0.02 perl(DBICx::TestDatabase::Subclass) Requires: perl(File::Temp) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030352.n533qekw031835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030352.n533qNfg022065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #6 from A S Alam 2009-06-02 23:52:22 EDT --- Thanks a lot. Package is build for devel and F-11. It is available on koji. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8550 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030353.n533rIdi022303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 23:53:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386537 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0de2971a401ebb7e18f71cc59c9fef48357f2bf4 python-application-1.1.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030353.n533rB2S022257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-02 23:53:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389114 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c509b763c0d2fe8df1c1b654bc4892c11bb7e83e line_profiler-1.0b2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application + Package python-line_profiler-1.0-0.3.b2.fc12.i586 => Provides: _line_profiler.so Requires: /usr/bin/python libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.6.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 03:58:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 23:58:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030358.n533wJgs023568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-02 23:58:18 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-application Short Description: Basic building blocks for python applications Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030434.n534YUWC031337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |503591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503591] Review Request: python-catwalk - A way to view your models using TurboGears In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030434.n534YUGq031311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503591 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |503592, 503590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030434.n534YVDq031359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |503591 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:32:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:32:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030432.n534Wv9d031087@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-03 00:32:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390409 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2037e3faf46e2c1077eae8b78dc1157b4ad97b6a tgext.admin-0.2.4.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. 1) where can I find python-tgext-crud? I can't install this on F-10. 2) you should change %define to %global -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:34:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:34:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503861] Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030434.n534Yum5008649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503861 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-03 00:34:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase Short Description: Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503861] Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030434.n534YwOP031490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503861 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030436.n534aPnN031991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-03 00:36:24 EDT --- sorry rpmlint output is not silent python-tgext-admin.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tgext/admin/test/lib/helpers.py python-tgext-admin.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tgext/admin/test/lib/base.py -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030441.n534f9FI009999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-03 00:41:07 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390410 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url b41d9b4b4fa5a459c29dec0df14c0e83d603b867 sprox-0.5.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Should: 1) add PKG_INFO to %doc 2) any reason to remove tests directory? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 04:41:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 00:41:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030441.n534fuHa000543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Silas Sewell 2009-06-03 00:41:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-line_profiler Short Description: A Python line-by-line profiler Owners: silas Branches: F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 05:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503867] New: Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time Alias: perl-Time-Warp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503867 Summary: Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-Warp OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Time-Warp.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Time-Warp-0.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Our external experience unfolds in 3 1/2 dimensions (time has a dimensionality of 1/2). The Time::Warp module offers developers control over the measurement of time. This module is redundant if you're from Gallifrey, and not recommended for use at high speeds near very massive objects. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390415 Additional Comment: This is a BR of a new testing BR of DBIx::Class::DateTime::Epoch. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 05:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030509.n5359Kr1015610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 478923 depends on bug 478920, which changed state. Bug 478920 Summary: Review Request: globus-xio-popen-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Pipe Open Driver https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478920 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-03 01:09:18 EDT --- There is a tiny issue. Otherwise the package is fine - rpmlint globus-ftp-client-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390424 * Please fix this warning globus_ftp_client_restart_marker.c:710: warning: format '%n' expects type 'int *', but argument 5 has type 'globus_size_t *' ---------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-ftp-client) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 05:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503867] Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030514.n535Ek6C006527@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503867 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-03 01:14:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390415 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0fd3e16c80a41228364d08978cc45b6391c7d02d Time-Warp-0.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=8, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.01 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.05 CPU) + Package perl-Time-Warp-0.5-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: perl(Time::Warp) = 0.5 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl(DynaLoader) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 05:19:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:19:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503867] Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030519.n535JKGg007445@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503867 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-03 01:19:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Time-Warp Short Description: Change the start and speed of Event time Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 05:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503867] Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030519.n535JNtQ017360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503867 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 05:52:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 01:52:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030552.n535q7Wd023750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-03 01:52:06 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/websvn-2.2.1-1.fc10.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/websvn-2.2.1-1.fc10.noarch.rpm SPECS/websvn.spec websvn.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/websvn apache websvn.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/websvn/temp ../../../var/tmp 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. - OK, non-standard-uid caused by owning files with apache user MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, builded and working on fc10 at x86 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, ... - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK builded ok in KOJI http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1390448 MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. - OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun - OK, no binary package MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review. - OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package - OK, no .so files present MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - OK MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la archives MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, not gui application MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 06:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 02:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030611.n536BpS8027430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-03 02:11:49 EDT --- Please update to latest cabal2spec, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 06:12:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 02:12:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464045] Review Request: sreadahead - Super Read Ahead In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030612.n536Ct46017800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464045 --- Comment #14 from Dan Hor?k 2009-06-03 02:12:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > I've ported this to use the utrace-ftrace support we currently have in > Fedora... Is that acceptable for rawhide/F-12? If that means that instead of relying on kernel patch for the proper function, you have reworked readahead itself, then it is fine. > I'll submit a patched srpm when I've done a bit more testing to make it > somewhat more bulletproof. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 06:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 02:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030646.n536khPG002836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-03 02:46:42 EDT --- I'm a bit late but anyway: 1. adding a fontconfig file to the package would be nice so it's substituted correctly 2. it would have been nicer to name the font guca-saab-fonts as per guidelines. If guca ever publishes another font the package will need to be renamed (not a blocker in the meanwhile) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 07:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030735.n537Zsce003791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #22 from D Haley 2009-06-03 03:35:53 EDT --- Absolutely fine. Sorry for the fuss. I updated my rpm tools, and now everything is fine. I was a bit confused by the wiki: "Right now the Fedora infrastructure does not support this feature" but it seems out of date. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 07:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030740.n537eYG9004857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-03 03:40:25 EDT --- Thank you for the review - I'll fix the warning... New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-ftp-client Short Description: Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 07:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 03:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030755.n537tT6d008608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-03 03:55:29 EDT --- Thanks Jan. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: websvn Short Description: Owners: xavierb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 08:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030808.n53885Zc021001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #14 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-03 04:08:04 EDT --- oops, sorry forgot the short description. Here's the full template again. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: websvn Short Description: Online subversion repository browser Owners: xavierb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 08:26:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:26:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030826.n538QJEp018120@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 04:26:16 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 08:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030828.n538S0lH026522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 04:27:58 EDT --- Please rebuild this package on koji and submit push requests on bodhi for F-10/11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 08:33:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:33:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030833.n538XXdT019778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #22 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-03 04:33:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > > With apologies for the severely delayed final review. *sigh* No sweat, Chris. Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Data-ObjectDriver Short Description: Simple, transparent data interface, with caching Owners: eseyman Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 08:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030842.n538gMWF030167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #8 from David Hannequin 2009-06-03 04:42:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Tk-Stderr Short Description: This module captures that standard error of a program and redirects it to a read only text widget. Owners: hvad Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: hvad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 08:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 04:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030844.n538iK2H030624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #9 from David Hannequin 2009-06-03 04:44:20 EDT --- Hi, My FAS login is hvad but i can't change fedora-cvs flag to ?. Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 09:10:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 05:10:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030910.n539Aomu006321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #14 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-06-03 05:09:37 EDT --- Updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 09:07:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 05:07:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030907.n5397rRa005328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 09:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 05:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906030940.n539eqGk015466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | --- Comment #8 from A S Alam 2009-06-03 05:40:50 EDT --- I have update SPEC file as well fontconfig file. SPEC file: http://aalam.fedorapeople.org/punjabi-fonts/saab/saab-fonts.spec SRPM: http://aalam.fedorapeople.org/punjabi-fonts/saab/saab-fonts-0.91-2.fc11.src.rpm Can you please check whether it will work or not? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:07:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:07:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031007.n53A7XjH022154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #27 from Paul Howarth 2009-06-03 06:07:26 EDT --- Time to get this review moving again. Here's a refresher of where we stand: Current rpmlint state --------------------- Source Package: W: unversioned-explicit-provides MTA W: unversioned-explicit-provides smtpdaemon W: unversioned-explicit-provides server(smtp) => All Ok - these are valid virtual provides for which a version would be inappropriate W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_sbindir}/sendmail W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_bindir}/mailq W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_bindir}/newaliases W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_bindir}/rmail W: unversioned-explicit-provides /usr/lib/sendmail W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_sysconfdir}/pam.d/smtp W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_mandir}/man1/mailq.1.gz W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_mandir}/man1/newaliases.1.gz W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_mandir}/man5/aliases.5.gz W: unversioned-explicit-provides %{_mandir}/man8/sendmail.8.gz => Current guidelines on alternatives usage (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/UsingAlternatives, not yet written into the main guidelines but approved by FPC - see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Minutes/20090414) says to %ghost these files rather than using explicit provides. (I see this is currently under discussion on fedora-packaging) E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/sendmail E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/sendmail.sendmail E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/sendmail.sendmail E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/sendmail.sendmail => legitimate install of /usr/lib/sendmail for backward script compatibility sendmail.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 964, tab: line 2) => easily fixed, and should be Main Binary Package: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib => rpmlint confused by a symlink to a binary elsewhere E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib64/sasl2/Sendmail.conf W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /usr/lib64/sasl2/Sendmail.conf => This is where cyrus-sasl puts things, so not much choice about this at the moment W: non-standard-gid /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail smmsp E: setgid-binary /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail smmsp 02755 E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/sbin/sendmail.sendmail 02755 E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/mqueue 0700 W: non-standard-uid /var/spool/clientmqueue smmsp W: non-standard-gid /var/spool/clientmqueue smmsp E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/clientmqueue 0770 => non-standard but correct W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/mail => This directory contains only the statistics file, which doesn't need rotating W: dangerous-command-in-%post chown => %post script is well-tested W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail => Listens only on localhost out of the box, so OK E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail sm-client E: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/sendmail sm-client => Two daemons running, both can't be coherent at the same time E: zero-length /var/log/mail/statistics => Intended and OK E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/mail/make => Script needs to be editable for people that build their databases in non-standard ways Configuration Package: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/sendmail-cf/sh/makeinfo.sh 0644 => Doesn't need to be executable due to the way it's called; could shut => rpmlint up by removing the shellbang or making it executable though Documentation Package: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/sendmail-8.14.3/contrib/etrn.0 => Should be recoded to UTF-8 like everything else in Fedora E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/sendmail-8.14.3/contrib/bounce-resender.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/sendmail-8.14.3/contrib/etrn.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/doc/sendmail-8.14.3/contrib/smcontrol.pl "/usr/local/bin/perl" => Should be using %{__perl} instead Milter Runtime Library Package: W: no-documentation => OK, there isn't really any documentation appropriate to this package 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 18 errors, 25 warnings. A few other general comments ---------------------------- Please consider adding the patches from Bug #485426 to fix socket descriptor leaks to child processes. Requires: chkconfig for %postun isn't needed. Requires: openssl/openldap aren't needed - automatic library dependencies suffice. sendmail-doc and sendmail-cf could be noarch subpackages. The %attr(0755,root,root) for %{_initrddir}/sendmail isn't necessary because the initscript is installed with the correct permissions in the first place. %global is preferred over %define for the sort of use made in this package. The initscript sources /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions and hence the main package should have a dependency on initscripts. Adding this would then mean that the directory ownership of /etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d was unnecessary, as the initscripts package also owns that directory. Consider adding a "/" suffix to directories owned by the package in the %files lists, for clarity. The provides for "MTA" and smtpdaemon are well before the rest of the provides in the spec; it'd be good if they were all together. %description doc says that "papers are provided in PostScript(TM) and troff formats" but it's now a PDF. Is there any point to supporting with_sasl1? It's not been used since RHEL 3 and there are lots of things in the current package that would prevent it being rebuilt for RHEL 3 (e.g. it would need to include /etc/aliases again). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031007.n53A7gcB015095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #23 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-03 06:07:41 EDT --- I forgot to add a between the 'BuildArch:' and 'noarch' parts of the 'BuildArch:noarch' directive, and rpmlint was complaining. So, I have made an 8-th release (where only the was added): Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/8/stxxl.spec (as well as the corresponding Source RPM: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/stxxl/121/7/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm) $ sha1sum stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm stxxl-1.2.1.tar.gz stxxl-build-* d04266f98f6e83e4a2307b3c5bc06ed259cf5e49 stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10.src.rpm bafa3c065395908e257ae76d19fa6883b374323f stxxl-1.2.1.tar.gz 6f99ae374c44fe6de98713f26d5b308e2c054d29 stxxl-build-shared-makefile.patch e0a01a5d7b5633a58f7f0c439df157b2407535ba stxxl-build-shared.patch APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031020.n53AKsWA026096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #24 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-03 06:20:53 EDT --- The wiki (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoarchSubpackages) may have to be updated, as it is stated that that feature targets F12 (only). However, since the fix of rpmlint (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-2946 , as mentioned by Michael above), having noarch sub-package does work with Fedora from version above 10. Since the wiki is the description of a feature, the owners (Florian Festi and Jindrich Novy ) could maybe be contacted to have them aware of that good news. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:22:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:22:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031022.n53AMA4p018960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-03 06:22:09 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031032.n53AWnde021929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-03 06:32:47 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS Short Description: XS based JavaScript minifier Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228544] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and service pollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031034.n53AYK2K029348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228544 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |imak at endosys.com --- Comment #16 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-06-03 06:34:16 EDT --- *** Bug 499023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499023] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and services poller In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031034.n53AYITH029325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499023 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-06-03 06:34:16 EDT --- keepalived is already in Fedora. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 228544 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:46:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031046.n53AkWaR032254@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #15 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-03 06:46:30 EDT --- Good! Please, one more (little) thing: - Comment this patch file (place comment line before Patch0: %{name}-copying.patch) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031046.n53AkOSw025113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |503847 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031046.n53AkMxV025080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Depends on| |503256 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 10:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 06:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031051.n53Apepl001130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-03 06:51:39 EDT --- - Judging from the Paperbox install page the buildrequires should be gtkmm-utils-devel boost-devel gtkmm24-devel glibmm24-devel libglademm-devel goocanvas-devel libgnomeui-devel tracker-devel dbus-glib-devel Now you have gtkmm24-devel and tracker-devel listed twice. - Also, you need Requires: hicolor-icon-theme for dir ownership. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 12:05:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226146] Merge Review: mkinitrd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031205.n53C5j07016809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226146 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-03 08:05:43 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 12:14:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:14:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031214.n53CEVcL019140@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 12:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031228.n53CStuv022292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from D Haley 2009-06-03 08:28:54 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stxxl Short Description: C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets Owners: mycae Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 12:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 08:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226146] Merge Review: mkinitrd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031239.n53Cdh7F016916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226146 --- Comment #6 from Hans de Goede 2009-06-03 08:39:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > ping mkinitrd most likely is dead (to be replaced by dracut in F-12), if it turns out that we are going to stick with it for another release, I'll fix the spec file and get back to you. If it really is dead I'll close this as wontfix. Thanks for your effort! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 13:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031309.n53D9UuB025500@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 09:09:29 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346390) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346390) Patch to compile on F-9 - Well, maybe gcc 4.3.0 (used in F-9) does not support nested inline functions. I tried to change to use non-inline nested function instead of nested inline function (in stroke.c) and it succeeds: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1391017 What is strange is that F-10 uses gcc 4.3.2 and with it build seems to succeed... - By the way Fedora specific compilation flags are not correctly honored. E.g. from http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/easystroke/0.4.4/3.fc12/data/logs/i586/ --------------------------------------------------------------- 78 cc -c -o gui.o gui.c 85 cc -c -o desktop.o desktop.c --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 13:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031314.n53DEAep026821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 09:14:08 EDT --- make %{?_smp_mflags} CXX="g++ %{optflags}" CC="gcc -std=c99 %{optflags}" can be a workaround. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 13:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031316.n53DGrRw002308@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #15 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-03 09:16:52 EDT --- OK, thanks. I'll resolve this and make new release of package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 13:23:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:23:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031323.n53DNjV5029724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 09:23:43 EDT --- Okay, now this package itself can be approved, so I will wait for your pre-review or another review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 13:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031320.n53DK5Gx028768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #26 from D Haley 2009-06-03 09:20:04 EDT --- Also requesting EL-5 New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: stxxl Short Description: C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets Owners: mycae Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 13:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 09:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503939] New: Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503939 Summary: Review Request: sblim-cim-client2 - Java CIM Client library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: vcrhonek at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cim-client2/sblim-cim-client2.spec SRPM URL: http://vcrhonek.fedorapeople.org/sblim-cim-client2/sblim-cim-client2-2.0.9.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The purpose of this package is to provide a CIM Client Class Library for Java applications. It complies to the DMTF standard CIM Operations over HTTP and intends to be compatible with JCP JSR48 once it becomes available. To learn more about DMTF visit http://www.dmtf.org. More infos about the Java Community Process and JSR48 can be found at http://www.jcp.org and http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=48. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 14:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031409.n53E9kK3011158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 10:09:46 EDT --- python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 14:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031409.n53E9gip011117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 10:09:41 EDT --- python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 14:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031434.n53EY4rl017885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #5 from Adam Goode 2009-06-03 10:34:02 EDT --- Ping? I really would like to see this package in. Michael, if you are too busy, I'd be happy to be the maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 14:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031445.n53EjKU7021054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #3 from Valent Turkovic 2009-06-03 10:45:18 EDT --- Do you need some help? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 14:56:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:56:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031456.n53EuYKg024520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #16 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-03 10:56:32 EDT --- Thanks mtasaka for helping here. aah! my eyes missed gui.c and desktop.c compilation lines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 15:09:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:09:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228544] Review Request: keepalived - HA monitor built upon LVS, VRRP and service pollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031509.n53F9sAN003317@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228544 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ruben at rubenkerkhof.com --- Comment #17 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-06-03 11:09:41 EDT --- (in reply to comment #15) keepalived builds fine on EL-4 and EL-5 (for me at least), but it fails to build in a EL-4 mockroot on a rawhide host. If you look at the mocks root.log you see that kernel-devel is installed, but somehow the rpm query in the spec doesn't pick it up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 15:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] New: Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 Summary: Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dcbw at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/mobile-broadband-provider-info.spec SRPM URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: The mobile-broadband-provider-info package contains listings of mobile broadband (3G) providers and associated network and plan information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 15:25:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:25:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031525.n53FPxEW008099@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #6 from Michael Ploujnikov 2009-06-03 11:25:58 EDT --- I'm sorry. I was so busy that I forgot I submitted this package. I was still reading the e-mails, but thinking that they were directed to someone else. I have time now, and I'll submit an update tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 15:51:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 11:51:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] New: Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Summary: Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rvinyard at cs.nmsu.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/gimpfx-foundry.spec SRPM URL: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: These scripts allow GIMP graphics to be endowed with special effects, such as blurring or distorting them in certain ways. This package has 117+ new scripts for GIMP that are not part of the graphic software's standard installation. Among them are the Roy Lichtenstein effect script to render graphics in the pop artist's style, the Planet Render script to create a planet of your choosing and desired size and dimension. and the Old Photo script to give existing photos that antiquated touch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031612.n53GCj95012863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #5 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 12:12:43 EDT --- I have got 0357fee5f1ab61e7ead345a2c76cd3b6 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 If you have changed anything in the upstream tar ball, please increase the minor version of it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031617.n53GHwV8014444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com --- Comment #10 from Xavier Lamien 2009-06-03 12:17:57 EDT --- Before request CVS administration against your package you need to be an approved packager member in order to proceed (as FAS said you're not currently). You will need to find a sponsor first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031620.n53GKbOk024693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #6 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-03 12:20:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I have got > > 0357fee5f1ab61e7ead345a2c76cd3b6 389-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 There is a squid cache on port389.org - most likely you are hitting the cache instead of the file on disk. Try again. > > > If you have changed anything in the upstream tar ball, please increase the > minor version of it. I'd rather not, for this case, since there is really no functionality change, and since this is a package rename, it's already distinct from fedora-ds-dsgw-1.1.2.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031623.n53GNwAF025513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 12:23:57 EDT --- I can overtake this part. Please create a membership request for the packager group on FAS, so I can sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031632.n53GW4xm027280@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-03 12:32:03 EDT --- New SPEC/SRPM for a new upstream release SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rygel.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rygel-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031629.n53GTg9x026603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 12:29:41 EDT --- Soory, the wrong md5sum is from the packaged tar ball which I have downloaded from the fedorapoeple.org place. Please provide a proper source rpm for review. And at least: Even if you didn't changed any user visible functionality, increase the version number, because this help us for audit the validation of the package source tar balls agains upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031651.n53Gpb1Q031563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 12:51:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031652.n53GqL7d031745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 12:52:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:54:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:54:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031654.n53GsfE4022717@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 12:54:39 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031653.n53GrBED022497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #23 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 12:53:09 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031653.n53GrETe022528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #12 from Xavier Lamien 2009-06-03 12:53:13 EDT --- Thanks Jochen to taking care of this as i don't even followed this review, i can go ahead on sponsorship. David, Please follow this step below in order to let Jochen sponsor you. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 16:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 12:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031653.n53Grphj032088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 12:53:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:05:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:05:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503867] Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031705.n53H5uYn003456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503867 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:05:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031707.n53H7Cj4003609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:07:10 EDT --- Please note that the proper branch name is "F-11". CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503861] Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031708.n53H85HE025606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503861 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:08:04 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031709.n53H9Amb025786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:09:09 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:09:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:09:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031709.n53H9wUT003994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:09:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:17:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:17:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031717.n53HHo4a027758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:17:49 EDT --- Please note that branch names are "F-10" and "F-11". CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031721.n53HL0WC028670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 --- Comment #17 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:20:56 EDT --- I have reread the last comments again. if Ralf has no interest for maintaining the EPEL part, put Jonathan may interested to see this package in EPEL, I want to suggest, that Ralf should create a CVSAdmin request for the EPEL branches. In this Request Ralf can enter Jonathan as the owner of the EPEL branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480146] Review Request: python-bicyclerepair - Python Refactoring Browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031723.n53HNVXZ007378@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480146 --- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:23:29 EDT --- Ping Jerome If i don't see any action for this review in the next four weeks, I will release this review as a staled review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031726.n53HQGhl008174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:26:15 EDT --- Soory, that I'M late. I thing we can ignore the issue with the demo, but it may be nice to have a README.Fedora file in the package which explains this issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490354] Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031729.n53HTAiq008843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:29:09 EDT --- Ping Dan. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:28:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:28:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031728.n53HSGgq008637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:28:15 EDT --- OK, please add a README.Fedora file which ecplains the issue on the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031744.n53HiAZt002728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #23 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:44:08 EDT --- Please push the packages to stable and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:42:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:42:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031742.n53HgrGK002395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 13:42:52 EDT --- Good: + Debuginfo package contains sources Bad: - Package contains no verbatin copy the the LGPL licensed parts - CC doesn't honour the RRM_OPT_FLAGS + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic' + make -j2 dvtm build options: cleaning CC dvtm.c CFLAGS = -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -std=c99 -Os -I. -I/usr/include -I/usr/local/i nclude -DVERSION="0.5.1" -DNDEBUG -DCONFIG_MOUSE -DCONFIG_STATUSBAR LDFLAGS = -L/usr/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lc -lutil -lncursesw CC = cc CC madtty.c dvtm.c: In function 'draw_border': dvtm.c:457: warning: 's' may be used uninitialized in this function bstack.c: In function 'bstack': bstack.c:3: warni -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453815] Review Request: globus-* - The Globus Toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031744.n53HiJqW002786@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453815 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Bug 453815 depends on bug 453865, which changed state. Bug 453865 Summary: Review Request: globus-proxy-utils - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Proxy Utility Programs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453865 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:44:17 EDT --- I'm closing this as there's no package to review; sthe guidelines were approved, separate review tickets were filed properly and things are moving into the distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463080] Review Request: cl-base64 - A Common Lisp BASE64 implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031747.n53HlILr003920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463080 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:47:16 EDT --- Nothing after two more months. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:49:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463083] Review Request: cl-xml - An XML parser written in Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031749.n53HnO7W004379@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463083 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:49:23 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463081] Review Request: cl-chunga - Portable chunked streams for Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031748.n53HmvfB004206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463081 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:48:56 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:49:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:49:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463082] Review Request: cl-clsql - A multi-platform SQL interface for Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031749.n53HnBTg004289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463082 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:49:10 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490354] Review Request: emacs-elib - The Emacs Lisp Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031748.n53Hm29Y013934@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490354 --- Comment #3 from Dan Atmakin 2009-06-03 13:48:01 EDT --- Thanks for review, Jochen. Sorry for delay. Your remarks is really important but i can't rebuild srpm right now. I'll try to rebuild rpm according with gnuemacs packaging gudelines in the near future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463090] Review Request: cl-usocket - A sockets library for Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031751.n53Hp9YP015077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463090 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:51:08 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463089] Review Request: cl-uffi - Lisp Universal Foreign Function Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031750.n53HosfO014988@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463089 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:50:52 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:49:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:49:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463084] Review Request: cl-ironclad - A cryptography library written entirely in Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031749.n53HnrDV014311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463084 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:49:51 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463088] Review Request: cl-trivial-gray-streams - A portable streams library for Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031750.n53HodfM014911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463088 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(green at redhat.com) | --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:50:38 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463087] Review Request: cl-sasl - A SASL client library for Common Lisp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031750.n53HoRt4005221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463087 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:50:26 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463085] Review Request: cl-md5 - A Common Lisp MD5 implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031750.n53Ho4Mi005071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463085 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:50:03 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:51:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:51:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463091] Review Request: cl-xmpp - A Common Lisp client implementation of the XMPP RFCs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031751.n53HpQjk005518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463091 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:51:25 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 463086] Review Request: cl-puri - A Common Lisp library for manipulating Universal Resource Identifiers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031750.n53HoFNe005146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=463086 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:50:14 EDT --- Links have been dead for months; no response to pings on other open cl-* tickets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 17:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 13:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031755.n53HtvkO016625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 13:55:52 EDT --- Since this is not currently reviewable (missing dependency for which there isn't even a pending review), I'm going to remove it from the review queue. Please clear the whiteboard if this becomes reviewable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:12:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:12:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031812.n53ICNRE021629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 14:12:22 EDT --- Okay. - This package itself can be approved - Usually we sponsor members request people who need sponsorship to either do pre-review of other person's review request or submit another review request. I see that you have already submitted some other review requests and one of them is already approved. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (perl-POE-Component-Log4perl) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031814.n53IEk4W012762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 14:14:44 EDT --- Lubomir, if you think there is no blocker for this review request, please feel free to approve this ticket. Removing NEEDSPONSOR as I am now sponsoring the submitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:16:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:16:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031816.n53IGMaV022818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 14:16:21 EDT --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR. Yanko, now you can make CVS request for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031816.n53IGqsb022932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |wtogami at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Warren Togami 2009-06-03 14:16:51 EDT --- Version: 20090602 Will this always be versioned by the date? Perhaps "0.20090602" might be better to allow for real version numbers in the future without Epoch? BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) This isn't even used by modern rpmbuild. Doesn't need to be so complicated. ExclusiveArch: noarch Please use "BuildArch: noarch" instead, except the next problem... [warren at newcaprica noarch]$ rpmlint mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc11.noarch.rpm mobile-broadband-provider-info.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/mobile-broadband-provider-info.pc This is a serious problem. Note the lib64 dir. Perhaps you can't make this noarch if you want to use pkgconfig? [warren at newcaprica SRPMS]$ rpmlint mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc11.src.rpm mobile-broadband-provider-info.src:25: W: make-check-outside-check-section make check mobile-broadband-provider-info.src:38: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(0644,root,root) %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:16:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:16:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031816.n53IGBwk013543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 14:16:10 EDT --- python-application-1.1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-application-1.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031816.n53IGFLR013600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 14:16:14 EDT --- python-application-1.1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-application-1.1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031833.n53IXcgu027827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #8 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-03 14:33:37 EDT --- Version changed to 1.1.3 Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-dsgw.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-dsgw-1.1.3-1.src.rpm Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-dsgw-1.1.3.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-dsgw-1.1.3.tar.bz2 cd46daccd82073e859c9531d50057a2c 389-dsgw-1.1.3.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031855.n53ItnpW001052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-03 14:55:48 EDT --- You missed the manpage... but that looks like the only item that you missed. Clean it up and I'll lift FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 18:59:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 14:59:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031859.n53IxplM001581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-03 14:59:50 EDT --- Good: + License tag state GPLv2 as described in the package + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Koji scratch build works fine your package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:05:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:05:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031905.n53J5n49003516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-03 15:05:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-dsgw Short Description: 389 Directory Server Gateway web apps Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031913.n53JDVh8004961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 --- Comment #3 from Jeremy Katz 2009-06-03 15:13:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Where does the tarball come from? I guess it's generated out of git somehow; > if it's really not directly downloadable anywhere, some instructions on > generating it would be good. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL Yeah, it's just a git snap. I'll add instructions > There's a bit of weird formatting in the %description. I guess someone tried > to fill it with a fixed right margin, so the word spacing is uneven. Not a > blocker, but I thought I'd mention it. Also fixed up New spec file at http://katzj.fedorapeople.org/review/grubby/grubby.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:22:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:22:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031922.n53JMXP2029096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 15:22:32 EDT --- Thanks, looks good. The only thing I can say is that your checkout instructions are missing a "cd grubby" but it's pretty obvious. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031923.n53JNKb4006743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-03 15:23:18 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP Short Description: A POE filter for SMTP Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031928.n53JS3I7007796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Jeremy Katz 2009-06-03 15:28:02 EDT --- Gracias New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: grubby Short Description: Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file Owners: katzj,pjones Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031930.n53JUWEp008447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 --- Comment #2 from Dan Williams 2009-06-03 15:30:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Version: 20090602 > > Will this always be versioned by the date? Perhaps "0.20090602" might be > better to allow for real version numbers in the future without Epoch? Done. > BuildRoot: %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > > This isn't even used by modern rpmbuild. Doesn't need to be so complicated. Recommended by packaging guidelines. > ExclusiveArch: noarch > > Please use "BuildArch: noarch" instead, except the next problem... Done. > [warren at newcaprica noarch]$ rpmlint > mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc11.noarch.rpm > mobile-broadband-provider-info.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/mobile-broadband-provider-info.pc > > This is a serious problem. Note the lib64 dir. Perhaps you can't make this > noarch if you want to use pkgconfig? Removed. > [warren at newcaprica SRPMS]$ rpmlint > mobile-broadband-provider-info-20090602-1.fc11.src.rpm > mobile-broadband-provider-info.src:25: W: make-check-outside-check-section make > check Fixed. > mobile-broadband-provider-info.src:38: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main > package) %attr(0644,root,root) %{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc removed. Spec URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/mobile-broadband-provider-info.spec SRPM URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/mobile-broadband-provider-info-0.20090602-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:32:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:32:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503810] Review Request: grubby -- Command line tool for updating boot loader configuration file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031932.n53JWcJp031205@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503810 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 15:32:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031948.n53JmA7V001995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 --- Comment #3 from Dan Williams 2009-06-03 15:48:09 EDT --- URL fixed, build instructions added, nvr updated. Spec URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/mobile-broadband-provider-info.spec SRPM URL: http://bigw.org/~dan/mobile-broadband-provider-info-0.20090602-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:49:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031949.n53JnUqw012689@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Warren Togami 2009-06-03 15:49:30 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031953.n53JrnbZ003170@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 15:53:48 EDT --- websvn-2.2.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/websvn-2.2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 19:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 15:53:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906031953.n53JrsSi013837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 15:53:53 EDT --- websvn-2.2.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/websvn-2.2.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032000.n53K0wme015337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 16:00:56 EDT --- Looks good to me. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 0c0155ad75c3cc73bf3d5a25e7e96e50b7dbf3f7f924c9c84d7f1dec8484925c pypar-2.1.0_66.tgz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: mpiext.so()(64bit) pypar = 2.1.0_66-2.fc11 pypar(x86-64) = 2.1.0_66-2.fc11 = libmpi.so.0()(64bit) libopen-pal.so.0()(64bit) libopen-rte.so.0()(64bit) libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit) numpy python(abi) = 2.6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032015.n53KFbkr018728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-03 16:15:37 EDT --- Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:14:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:14:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032014.n53KEvDT018172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-03 16:14:56 EDT --- Thanks for picking this up and for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pypar Short Description: Parallel programming with Python Owners: jussilehtola Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032016.n53KGQ2h008325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 16:16:25 EDT --- Honestly I don't know if "derived" legally permits modification or not, although it seems pretty obvious to me that's the intent. I don't think it's public domain in any case, because I don't see anything relinquishing copyright. I guess the legal folks can tell us with certainty. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:21:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:21:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032021.n53KLR26019928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 16:21:26 EDT --- ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032021.n53KLWEH019966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 16:21:32 EDT --- ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:18:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:18:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032018.n53KIYUD019142@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:23:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:23:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032023.n53KNXNm009842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-03 16:23:32 EDT --- Not public domain, but all the right permissions are there. Mark it as: License: Copyright only and we'll be fine here. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032034.n53KYK9a011874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-03 16:34:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl Short Description: Logging extension for the POE environment Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032042.n53KgeYL024402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 16:42:39 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint is silent. FYI, I agree that conditionally running a test depending on the name of the user running it is dumb and needs to be patched out. I can see why this would require Test::More at runtime. It doesn't appear anywhere in the final package (save the Changelog, where it talks about the test suite). * source files match upstream. sha256sum: afb0e7a20a95f0e8004296fdecd1c320ec7d296cbdb5ce7bbc0a1f75266d7e84 Config-Properties-1.70.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. ? final provides and requires are sane: perl(Config::Properties) = 1.70 perl-Config-Properties = 1.70-1.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Carp) perl(IO::Handle) ? perl(Test::More) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=52, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 0.31 cusr 0.07 csys = 0.45 CPU) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032047.n53KleBn014759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 16:47:38 EDT --- OK, I'll just pretend the license is changed as above as I review this. Just make the change when you check in. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 00cdd627996104df5cedee8e78596698917879b726263987d85b38d69d870c62 HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(HTML::CalendarMonthSimple) = 1.25 perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple = 1.25-2.fc11 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Date::Calc) perl(strict) * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032051.n53KpnQO026448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 --- Comment #2 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-03 16:51:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review Tibbs. New version, fixesthe useless Requires : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Config-Properties.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 20:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 16:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032058.n53KwWYh016820@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-03 16:58:32 EDT --- Thanks for the review Tibbs. New package, fixes the license : Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple-1.25-3.fc10.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple Short Description: Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars Owners: xavierb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032102.n53L2n5M017807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 17:02:49 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032102.n53L2iFm017764@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 17:02:44 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032107.n53L7sIU018900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 17:07:53 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:08:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:08:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032108.n53L8SBn029922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-03 17:08:26 EDT --- Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:14:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:14:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032114.n53LEKrL020080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-03 17:14:19 EDT --- I updated all packages (btw new version is on upstream, so I included it) Closing now. Thanks to Tasaka, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:25:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:25:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032125.n53LPkPv022641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #56 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-06-03 17:25:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #55) > (In reply to comment #54) > > As cairo maintainer denying to include XKB support into main cairo package, > > what if cairo-experimental package will be made to include those such > > extensions like XKB? It can work in two ways: > > XCB (the X Client Binding), not XKB (the X KeyBoard extension). Oh, sure, thanks. > > 1. Rename library to libcairo-experimental.so, and link awesome against it. But > > here is high risk that both cairo libraries will be loaded. > > > > 2. Put libcairo.so to an alternative path like /usr/lib/cairo-expermental and > > add it to ld.so search path so it loaded instead of main cairo. > > (freetype-freeworld in RPM Fusion work this way.) This way it will override > > system cairo. > > > > I?m inclined to try second way. What do you think about it? > > Sounds like a very crude kludge, but it would most probably work. > > Are you sure your time wouldn't be better spent reviewing cairo's XCB backend > and determining what needs to be done in order to bring it on par with the > libX11 backend? > > You could write a summary to both the XCB and Cairo lists, asking if one of the > developers wants to help you out. Searching cairo list, I found: http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/2008-December/016008.html Merging XCB and Xlib backends may be the proper way in long term. But if that requires time of GSoC project... I don?t think I have that now, considering that I?m doing other GSoC project now. Packaging work looks to be less hard. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:34:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:34:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032134.n53LY4wc023935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #22 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-03 17:34:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346464) spec file updated spec file updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032135.n53LZHhZ024386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #23 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-03 17:35:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346465) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346465) src.rpm package updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 21:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032139.n53LdAWX024877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #24 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-03 17:39:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #20) > OK Toshio, I'm taking this over. > > Mauricio: it's a good practice to try building packages in mock. It looks > difficult at the beginning (I know this from my own experience) but helps you > to create high-quality packages. > For stepping in have a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/MockTricks > Ok, this is going to take me a while, currently very bussy and I have to make some space to do the local mirror, etc...so hopefully the packages created without mock are at least at a decent quality :-) > With using mock you'll find out that you need to more build dependencies: > * mono-debugger-devel instead of mono-debugger > * mono-addins-devel fixed in the attached files... > > Furthermore I would prefer to adjust the release number to a single number. > > The %defattr macro in %files should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) done... > > At the end it would be great if you could split out the *.pc file in a *-devel > package. > no idea how to do that, if you teach me with this package I can apply it ot the other mono packages that I'm preparing..The mainstream don't do that with the package, at least not with the opensuse one... > > The rest looks really good and builds well. If we solve this last errors I'll > do the full review. great!!, thanks, what about the gdb package?, both debuggers addins (mdb and gdb) for monodevelop are very handy.. > Thanks also to Ryan for creating the fixes! Yeap, thanks Ryan!! > > Paul Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032212.n53MCAXd031327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032211.n53MBtLw031269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 18:11:54 EDT --- FYI, I get 78 rpmlint complaints: 75 undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints and three unused-direct-shlib-dependency complaints (on libm). You only get these if you install the package and then run "rpmlint libint". The undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings are in two libraries: libr12-stable.so.1.0.0 and libderiv-stable.so.1.0.0. It looks like these refer to symbols in libint-stable.so and you're supposed to be sure to link against the proper libraries yourself. Which is bad form, but doesn't block this package. The URL gives "403 Forbidden". I would recommend http://www.files.chem.vt.edu/chem-dept/valeev/software/libint/libint.html or http://libint.valeyev.net/. None of the source files has any license info at all. The LICENSE file includes the block of text which should be at the top of every source file, and there's no copy of the GPL in sight. The text in the LICENSE file is sufficient to establish that the package is GPLv2+, but upstream is most definitely doing it wrong. It's somewhat surprising that there's no test suite. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: f67b13bdf1135ecc93b4cff961c1ff33614d9f8409726ddc8451803776885cff libint-1.1.4.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: libint-1.1.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libderiv-stable.so.1()(64bit) libint-stable.so.1()(64bit) libr12-stable.so.1()(64bit) libint = 1.1.4-1.fc11 libint(x86-64) = 1.1.4-1.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libderiv-stable.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libint-stable.so.1()(64bit) libr12-stable.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) libint-devel-1.1.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libint-devel = 1.1.4-1.fc11 libint-devel(x86-64) = 1.1.4-1.fc11 = libderiv-stable.so.1()(64bit) libint = 1.1.4-1.fc11 libint-stable.so.1()(64bit) libr12-stable.so.1()(64bit) * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * shared libraries installed; ldconfig is called properly unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * headers are in the -devel package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032220.n53MKSC5012048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 18:20:27 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032227.n53MRHDE013164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #26 from steve 2009-06-03 18:27:16 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: wordnet Short Description: A lexical database for the english language Owners: lonetwin Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: lonetwin sundaram -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032223.n53MNwD5012463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #25 from steve 2009-06-03 18:23:55 EDT --- Hello spot, (In reply to comment #24) > == Review == > > Good: > ... > APPROVED. > Thanks ! > Pick up the steps here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Get_Sponsored > Thanks for sponsoring me too ! > Also, please don't forget about wmfire (478744)! I've updated the BZ with a newer spec and srpm. In relation to this bug, I have a question about sponsorship -- after being sponsored, does one have to wait for one's packages to be reviewed by another person (I would assume yes, since peer review is always a good thing), before submitting a CVS request ? cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032242.n53MgkoB016148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #25 from Paul Lange 2009-06-03 18:42:45 EDT --- You can find a simple example for creating a devel-subpackage in my flickrnet package here: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flickrnet/devel/flickrnet.spec?view=markup More complete information is at http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-subpack.html Could you please adjust the release number to a single number (not 1.1; and please adjust the changelog accordingly) If you create some packages for the gdb-debugger I'll have a look at them too! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 22:43:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:43:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032243.n53Mhts9016255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-03 18:43:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-Properties Short Description: Read and write property files Owners: xavierb Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504050] New: Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504050 Summary: Review Request: kdevplatform - Libraries for use by KDE development tools Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kdevplatform/kdevplatform.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kdevplatform/kdevplatform-0.9.93-0.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: KDE Development platform, the foundations upon which KDevelop and Quanta are built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032330.n53NUYbb024883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 --- Comment #16 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-06-03 19:30:33 EDT --- Ok, done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:31:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:31:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032331.n53NVP4b012647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #14 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-03 19:31:24 EDT --- koji build on F12 rawhide is here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1392690 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479876] Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032336.n53NaOt6025961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479876 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 19:36:23 EDT --- I've seen no reply and this package still doesn't build; I'll close this ticket soon if there's no progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: show - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032338.n53NcaIM026128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 19:38:35 EDT --- Was there any progress on the new package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032340.n53Ne7hK026649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 19:40:05 EDT --- Was any progress made on getting this package into shape? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 3 23:52:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 19:52:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499476] Review Request: orbited - A browser(javascript)->tcp bridge In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906032352.n53NqBnL016383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499476 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 19:52:10 EDT --- Doesn't this need an initscript to start the daemon? What about the config file in /etc/orbited.cfg? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 00:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040005.n5405vAH019227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 20:05:56 EDT --- This builds fine and rpmlint is silent except for the two complaints that it always spews for R packages. The license is a bit unclear. DESCRIPTION says "GPL-2", but src/pijt.c (the only other file that seems to have a license uses the FSF-recommended language and says GPLv2+. Can you clarify with upstream whether the code is GPLv2 only or GPLv2+? Upstream seems to be active. Why is the %check section commented out? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 7dd0e5ce54e67afe7ea40b0ad127b270c7e822a29aaa3e7373fe465bb361026f msm_0.8.2.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. ? license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: msm.so()(64bit) R-msm = 0.8.2-1.fc11 R-msm(x86-64) = 0.8.2-1.fc11 = /bin/sh R libR.so()(64bit) libRblas.so()(64bit) libRlapack.so()(64bit) libgfortran.so.3()(64bit) ? %check is present but commented out. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (R package registration) * code, not content. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 01:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 21:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040131.n541VHgS017017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #7 from Michael Ploujnikov 2009-06-03 21:31:16 EDT --- Updated spec and srpm: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libtiff.spec http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-14.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /home/plouj/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-14.fc10.src.rpm /home/plouj/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-14.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiff.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffvers.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.la mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.la mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.hxx mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 10 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 02:04:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:04:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040204.n54242hO012525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 22:04:00 EDT --- Builds fine; rpmlint says: erlang-erlsyslog.x86_64: E: no-binary erlang-erlsyslog.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Both are completely wrong, unless somehow /usr/lib64/erlang/lib/erlsyslog-0.1/ebin/erlsyslog.beam is a Martian text file and not a binary. Not that it really matters since you can't get rpm to show you the expanded comments anyway, but your checkout instructions are missing a '%' near the end: # svn export -r %{svnver} http://erlsyslog.googlecode.com/svn/trunk {realname} * source files match upstream (compared manually) * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: erlang-erlsyslog = 0.1-0.3.svn10.fc11 erlang-erlsyslog(x86-64) = 0.1-0.3.svn10.fc11 = erlang * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 02:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040222.n542MLnT017789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 22:22:20 EDT --- This does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1392831 Please do a local mock build or a koji scratch build when submitting packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 02:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040235.n542ZeWr002077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 22:35:39 EDT --- I made an error, sorry, and must revoke my approval. Your versioning is not proper since this is a subversion checkout. Please see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages for information on versioning snapshots. You _must_ include the date of the snapshot in the version before your "svn10" bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 02:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502990] Review Request: erlang-eradius - RADIUS authentication/accounting for erlang apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040239.n542dThv022324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502990 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 22:39:27 EDT --- This builds OK. rpmlint says: erlang-eradius.x86_64: E: no-binary erlang-eradius.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib These are bogus. erlang-eradius.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/erlang-eradius-0/MIT_LICENSE There's no reason for the license file to be executable. You should really run rpmlint over your packages and at least fix the trivial stuff. As this is a snapshot, you must include the snapshot date (20070627) in your release. See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages for more information. * source files match upstream (checked manually). X package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. X rpmlint has a valid complaint. * final provides and requires are sane: erlang-eradius = 0-0.2.fc11 erlang-eradius(x86-64) = 0-0.2.fc11 = erlang * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. X file permissions on MIT_LICENSE are odd. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 02:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:43:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040243.n542hlLH023703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 22:43:45 EDT --- This does not build. A scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1392846 Please do a local mock build or a koji scratch build when submitting a package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 02:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 22:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503800] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040250.n542oJDh026357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-03 22:50:17 EDT --- It does not seem to me as if sherry151 is a member of the packager group. If that's the case, please read through http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join. There's a colored box with a red exclamation mark in the "Create Your Review Request" section indicating the special procedure for submitting your first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 03:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040311.n543BVxq012046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-03 23:11:30 EDT --- perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 03:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] New: Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Summary: Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libiodbc/libiodbc.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The iODBC Driver Manager is a free implementation of the SAG CLI and ODBC compliant driver manager which allows developers to write ODBC compliant applications that can connect to various databases using appropriate backend drivers. Needed for newer versions of soprano, for virtuoso support (for kde-4.3) Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1392918 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 03:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] New: Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Summary: Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sherry151 at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085.spec: Release 2 spec file http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085-1.3.5-2.fc10.src.rpm: Release 2 SRPM Description: This is a graphical simulator for intel 8085 assembly language programs and has some nice features. This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 03:58:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:58:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503800] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040358.n543wVis009610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Resolution| |INSUFFICIENT_DATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 03:58:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:58:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040358.n543wad4022171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-03 23:58:36 EDT --- NOTE: iodbc-config has issues, multilib conflicts, hard-coded references to unpackaged static libs, libtool archives. Not sure how best to address that... maybe rewrite to use pkg-config(?). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 03:57:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 23:57:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040357.n543vngt022019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://sourceforge.net/proj | |ects/gnusim8085/ Platform|All |i386 Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040401.n5441aIw023092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 00:01:34 EDT --- Indeed, builds fine and rpmlint finds nothing to whine about. I note there are what seem to three test files in the tarball. Could they be run at package build time? It doesn't really look like it (at least one is interactive) but I figured I'd ask. I can't find anything wrong, so I'll just assume that the test stuff isn't useful for a build-time test and approve this. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: ef2e30318170b914527285dcb4c0ecfa138a0cdcef462ca874bb986b3840ce76 ancient-0.9.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm dllancient.so()(64bit) ocaml(Ancient) = a808df18618232a19217dd1014d99175 ocaml-ancient = 0.9.0-1.fc11 ocaml-ancient(x86-64) = 0.9.0-1.fc11 = ocaml(Pervasives) = 88cb1505c8bdf9a4dcd2cdf3452732b4 ocaml(Unix) = 0596a58544f8cd88fed5bf5432a53d43 ocaml(runtime) = 3.11.0 ocaml-ancient-devel-0.9.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ocaml-ancient-devel = 0.9.0-1.fc11 ocaml-ancient-devel(x86-64) = 0.9.0-1.fc11 = ocaml-ancient = 0.9.0-1.fc11 * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * .cma, .cmi, .so, .so.owner, META files in the main package. * .a, .cmxa, .cmx and .mli files are in the -devel subpackage. * .cmo, .o and .ml files not included * .so files have no rpath APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:01:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:01:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040401.n5441GY3010585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-04 00:01:14 EDT --- *** Bug 503800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:01:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:01:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503800] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040401.n5441F5m010564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503800 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com Resolution|INSUFFICIENT_DATA |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-04 00:01:14 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 504077 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040405.n5445EYF023925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-04 00:05:13 EDT --- can you please follow new package submission process given at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Contributor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503867] Review Request: perl-Time-Warp - Change the start and speed of Event time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040419.n544Jfpb014935@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503867 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-04 00:19:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503861] Review Request: perl-DBICx-TestDatabase - Create a temporary database from a DBIx::Class::Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040419.n544JcL5014904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503861 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-04 00:19:37 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:21:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:21:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040421.n544LSXo015638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 00:21:27 EDT --- This fails to build. Here's a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1392985 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:31:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:31:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478722] Review Request: ossim - Open Source Software Image Map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040431.n544VqF8018099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478722 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(cristian.balint at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 00:31:50 EDT --- Hmm, another three months without that new package. I guess I'll close this soon if it doesn't turn up. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040437.n544b37j031769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #3 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2009-06-04 00:37:03 EDT --- I did follow the guidelines given in the wiki page and closed the previous request and added a new one with FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the "blocks"and "first package" in the description field. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:35:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:35:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040435.n544ZLoJ031376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 00:35:20 EDT --- globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040435.n544ZQJd031440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 00:35:25 EDT --- globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 04:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 00:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040435.n544ZFGx019119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 00:35:14 EDT --- globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 05:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040525.n545PriJ028469@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 01:25:52 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. There seems to be a test suite included in the tarball. Any reason not to run it at build time? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 6049385a7032628c9a9bc2ac578ce1826e4179b0a8a9f33b535f022fabd8d3ea sqlparse-0.1.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: python-sqlparse = 0.1.1-1.fc11 = /usr/bin/python python(abi) = 2.6 X A test suite is present but not run. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 05:32:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:32:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040532.n545W0Mh010245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 --- Comment #3 from Julian Sikorski 2009-06-04 01:31:59 EDT --- Unfortunately not, my thesis work is taking up too much time currently. If somebody wants to contribute, feel free to do so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 05:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499875] Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040532.n545WG6N029742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 01:32:15 EDT --- This fails to build. Here's a scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393061 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 05:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040545.n545jAAv032102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #19 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 01:45:07 EDT --- Done http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-AppTools.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 05:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040551.n545pZnW013541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 01:51:34 EDT --- Done http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-EnthoughtBase.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 05:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 01:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040557.n545vmY2014577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-04 01:57:47 EDT --- Thanks for the note! rpmlint is not silent, however these messages just because the package contains only bytecode data in %{libdir}. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc10.ppc.rpm erlang-erlsom.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-erlsom.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc10.ppc.rpm koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040608.n5468oL8016625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-04 02:08:48 EDT --- Now, I APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:19:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:19:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502592] Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040619.n546J5Q8018710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Bug 502592 depends on bug 502591, which changed state. Bug 502591 Summary: Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502592] Review Request: btnx-config - GUI configuration tool for btnx In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040619.n546JYPU018827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502592 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-04 02:19:33 EDT --- I contacted upstream about evdev incompatibility and maintaining. Here is the answer: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- btnx is unofficially dead and I have moved onto other things. It's been a while since I looked at what caused the problems so my memory is a little rusty. But at least one problem was that evdev locked the input device preventing btnx from reading it. I remember doing some stuff with HAL (I don't remember the module name anymore) and I got around the problem, but it ended up being too complicated to make casual users go through the process and mistakes could lead to an unstartable X session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- According to this, I'm closing this thread. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502591] Review Request: btnx - Button Extension- a GNU/GPL mouse tool for GNU/Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040619.n546J4Wt018688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502591 Zarko (grof) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Zarko (grof) 2009-06-04 02:19:03 EDT --- I contacted upstream about evdev incompatibility and maintaining. Here is the answer: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- btnx is unofficially dead and I have moved onto other things. It's been a while since I looked at what caused the problems so my memory is a little rusty. But at least one problem was that evdev locked the input device preventing btnx from reading it. I remember doing some stuff with HAL (I don't remember the module name anymore) and I got around the problem, but it ended up being too complicated to make casual users go through the process and mistakes could lead to an unstartable X session. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- According to this, I'm closing this thread. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040622.n546Mqp1019712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 --- Comment #3 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-04 02:22:52 EDT --- Fixed. I updated to ver. 0.1. http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsyslog.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint just complains about bytecode files in %{libdir} [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ rpmlint erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc10.ppc.rpm erlang-erlsyslog.ppc: E: no-binary erlang-erlsyslog.ppc: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. [petro at Sulaco ppc]$ Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:27:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:27:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504087] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504087 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-Ex ternalServer OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer-0.05-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows configuration using /etc/sysconfig/myapp. First make a file called /etc/sysconfig/myapp and then write some variables in it. The variables that you add to the file will automatically override the environment variables. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393092 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504087] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040656.n546u2lx027205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504087 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-04 02:56:01 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393092 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 14d8c45d1abe24bd4c66456003aafb663b1aace5 Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=6, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.01 sys + 1.64 cusr 0.05 csys = 1.75 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer-0.05-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Helper::FastCGI::ExternalServer) = 0.05 Requires: perl(Catalyst::Utils) perl(Cwd) perl(DateTime) perl(File::Spec) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:54:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:54:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040654.n546suAX012946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-04 02:54:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libint Short Description: A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498189] Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040658.n546whd9013809@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:58:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:58:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040658.n546wiAI013830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Bug 500959 depends on bug 498189, which changed state. Bug 498189 Summary: Review Request: perl-JavaScript-Minifier-XS - XS based JavaScript minifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498189 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 06:56:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 02:56:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040656.n546uhPi013590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #27 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-04 02:56:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > In relation to this bug, I have a question about sponsorship -- after being > sponsored, does one have to wait for one's packages to be reviewed by another > person (I would assume yes, since peer review is always a good thing), before > submitting a CVS request ? For updates to an existing package, you have direct commit access. For new packages, you have to follow the review process as usual. You can even review others packages now except when they are a completely new packager and waiting on sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 07:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 03:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040713.n547DGLI030587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Beno?t Marcelin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Beno?t Marcelin 2009-06-04 03:13:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dynamic-wallpaper Short Description: Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others Owners: sereinit Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: none -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 07:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 03:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040749.n547nI13006026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-06-04 03:49:17 EDT --- Yes, I'll have a look at running the tests when I upload. Thanks for reviewing this package. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ocaml-ancient Short Description: OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing Owners: rjones Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:02:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:02:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040802.n5482r6s009109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 04:02:51 EDT --- As in comment#4 upstream refused to add LGPLv2 copy .. so I have put in one. Regarding second issue .. in actual the CC dvtm.c and CC madtty.c where actually using CFLAGS but echo in Makefile was wrong .. I have fixed it and updated. Done http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dvtm-0.5.1-4.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dvtm.spec %changelog * Thu Jun 04 2009 Rakesh Pandit 0.5.1-4 - Updated Makefile patch to echo current execution lines for - dvtm.c and madtty.c and added LGPLv2 txt file Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040816.n548G9IY031614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-04 04:16:07 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040824.n548OBcv014218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-04 04:24:10 EDT --- For record only, Discussions around this package review was started on https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/22. Now it will be carried out here. FYI, there is somewhat equivalent simulator for 8085 maintained by Fabian Affolter. http://gsim85.sourceforge.net/ I'll do the review and eventually sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:23:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:23:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040823.n548NgVP014126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Jan ONDREJ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ondrejj at salstar.sk --- Comment #4 from Jan ONDREJ 2009-06-04 04:23:40 EDT --- Please, add patch from this bug: http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/2280 This fixes ability to set content_type for templates. Direct link to plain text patch: http://trac.turbogears.org/attachment/ticket/2280/custom_content_type.patch?format=raw Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:32:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:32:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040832.n548WCLA016391@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #24 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-04 04:32:10 EDT --- ping Brennan ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:31:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040831.n548VwYm002998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #30 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-04 04:31:52 EDT --- ping Lane ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040837.n548bZqV017626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 04:37:32 EDT --- perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040837.n548bwKQ004369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #18 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-04 04:37:56 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mysqludf_xql Short Description: MySQL UDF library for XML output Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 08:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 04:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040858.n548whSs023545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ Bug 492197 depends on bug 496525, which changed state. Bug 496525 Summary: Review Request: tritonus - Java Sound API Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496525 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #5 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-04 04:58:42 EDT --- Official review: OK: rpmlint gives no warning or error OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Shell script for fetching is included. OK: Builds fine. OK: BuildRequires are good. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Javadoc is in separate package. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 09:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 05:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040907.n5497CmK012318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #2 from Deji Akingunola 2009-06-04 05:07:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > This does not build. A scratch build: Fixed. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch-5.1.6-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 09:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 05:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040918.n549IwTd029706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 09:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 05:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040934.n549YS0A001115@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-04 05:34:27 EDT --- Not much to check: OK: rpmlint is clean OK: spec file is legible and in English, macros are used consistently OK: license is Fedora approved OK: name respects Fedora Naming Guidelines OK: spec name is same as package name OK: source matches upstream OK: time stamps are preserved OK: package owns all directories or requires packages that own them OK: all relevant files included in %doc, files in %doc are not needed for operation OK: permissions are set properly OK: no file conflicts or general names OK: %{?dist} used in release OK: builds in mock. NEEDSWORK: License tag is incorrect, should be: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and Public Domain NEEDSWORK: SHOULD: Package does not contain license texts, query upstream to include them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 09:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 05:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906040937.n549bIeu020342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-04 05:37:16 EDT --- Official review: OK: rpmlint gives the following eclipse-findbugs-contrib.noarch: W: no-documentation eclipse-findbugs-contrib.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/eclipse/dropins/findbugs/plugins/edu.umd.cs.findbugs.plugin.eclipse_1.3.8.20090315/fb-contrib-3.8.1.jar /usr/share/findbugs/plugin/fb-contrib-3.8.1.jar but it's not a problem because this package creates only symlink for integration in the eclipse-findbugs package OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. Separate packages for javadoc and samples. OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 10:29:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 06:29:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041029.n54ATj1d002723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #4 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-04 06:29:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet-0.43-3.fc11.src.rpm - Add manpage - Removed reference to Tetris in the bastet manpage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 12:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 08:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492533] Review Request: choqok - KDE Micro-Blogging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041214.n54CEN7t027467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492533 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 13:04:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:04:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041304.n54D4xg6022498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-04 09:04:58 EDT --- Fedora review xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-06-04 $ rpmlint *.rpm xsynth-dssi.spec xsynth-dssi.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/xsynth-dssi jack-dssi-host 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint is OK - the dangling symlink is resolved by a dependency * package is named according to packaging guidelines * the spacfile is named after the package * the package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) * the license tag matches the license statements in the sources * the license file (COPYING) is installed as %doc * the specfile is written in legible English * source matches upstream 9186bb3ef8aff99e2aef644c946e5d55 xsynth-dssi-0.9.2.tar.gz 9186bb3ef8aff99e2aef644c946e5d55 SRPM/xsynth-dssi-0.9.2.tar.gz * the package compiles in mock (Fedora 10) * build requirements are sane * package owns its directories or depend on packages that do * no duplicate files * permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * desktop file is installed using desktop-file-install * package does not own other's directories * %install clears buildroot * installed filenames are UTF8 ! the package installs an icon file but does not have any icon cache handling scriptlets. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 13:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041310.n54DARQl024216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tcallawa at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-04 09:10:26 EDT --- Trademark stuff looks good now, thanks. A few other issues that need to be resolved: * The License: should be GPLv3+ (look at the code headers). * You're also not building it with %{optflags}. (passing CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" to make should do the trick) * You're also using the old icon cache scriptlets, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache * You do not need to manually gzip the manpage, just install it uncompressed into the proper mandir and rpm will gzip it properly for you. I think that fixing those items should be enough for me to finish the review. Lifting FE-Legal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 13:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mmaslano at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec SRPM: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Pod-Abstract-0.17-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: POD::Abstract provides a means to load a POD (or POD compatible) document without direct reference to it's syntax, and perform manipulations on the abstract syntax tree. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 13:49:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504151] New: Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504151 Summary: Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/python-iterthreader/python-iterthreader.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/python-iterthreader/python-iterthreader-20060718-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: It is similar to itertools.imap, but it calls each function in its own thread and uses Queues for moving the data around. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041401.n54E1BMT006880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:00:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:00:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498073] Review Request: python-ekg - Community Health Reporter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041400.n54E0qSV024920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498073 --- Comment #7 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-06-04 10:00:51 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/python-ekg-0.4.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041411.n54EBYKj010243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 --- Comment #2 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-06-04 10:11:33 EDT --- New spec and SRPM: Spec: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/gimpfx-foundry.spec SRPM: http://miskatonic.cs.nmsu.edu/pub/gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-2.fc10.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > NEEDSWORK: License tag is incorrect, should be: GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ and Public > Domain I didn't realize that multiple licenses were possible. It's updated. > NEEDSWORK: SHOULD: Package does not contain license texts, query upstream to > include them. I'll drop them a note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041413.n54EDNpH029129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mattias.ellert at fysast.uu.se Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-04 10:13:22 EDT --- Fedora review nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-1.fc10.src.rpm 2009-06-04 $ rpmlint *.rpm nekobee-dssi.spec nekobee-dssi.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/nekobee jack-dssi-host 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. * OK ! needs attention * rpmlint is OK - the dangling symlink is satisfied with a dependency * the package is named according to the guidelines * the specfile is is named after the package * the package is licensed under a Fedora approved license (GPLv2+) * the license tag matches the licens statements in the sources One file (src/nekobee_synth.h) says that part of the file is LGPLv2.1, but "LGPLv2.1 gives you permission to relicense the code under any version of the GPL since GPLv2" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Footnote7 so this relicensing is permitted. * the license file (COPYING) is included as %doc * the spec file is written in legible English * source matches upstream e8b491b83e77f778df542d0066271d40 nekobee-0.1.7.tar.gz e8b491b83e77f778df542d0066271d40 SRPM/nekobee-0.1.7.tar.gz * package builds in mock (Fedora 10) * build requires are sane * package owns its directories or depend on packages that do * no duplicate files * permissions are sane and %files has %defattr * %clean clears buildroot * desktop files are installed using desktop-file-install * package does not own other's directories * %install clear buildroot * installed filenames are UTF8 ! the package installs an icon file but does not have any icon cache handling scriptlets. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:23:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:23:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041423.n54ENcbF032371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #3 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:23:18 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503742] Review Request: libssh - A library implementing the SSH2 protocol (0xbadc0de version) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041421.n54ELP5U031825@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503742 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-04 10:21:24 EDT --- Build as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=104812 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041424.n54EOYtw015037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #6 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:24:30 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041424.n54EOwq8015148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 --- Comment #1 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:24:57 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041424.n54EO77I014853@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #3 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:24:05 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:25:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:25:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041425.n54EPIPh000699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 --- Comment #1 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:25:17 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501400] Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041425.n54EPinE000795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501400 --- Comment #1 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 10:25:35 EDT --- Any takers? What can I do to help this along? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 14:54:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 10:54:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041454.n54Es5QY024595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-04 10:54:04 EDT --- Okay, looks good now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041514.n54FEDQA014622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 11:14:11 EDT --- @David: I have sponsor your, so you can create a CVSAdmin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:14:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:14:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504087] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041514.n54FEEYl014645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504087 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-04 11:14:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer Short Description: FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041516.n54FGjha031747@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 11:16:43 EDT --- In general, if upstream not provide the verbatin copy of the license you don't need to put your own release of a copy into the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504087] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041514.n54FEH4L030903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504087 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041518.n54FIJPS016105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Christopher Aillon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(caillon at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #15 from Christopher Aillon 2009-06-04 11:18:17 EDT --- Whoops, missed you assigning this to me. Was waiting on you to actually ping me. Will add this to my todo list now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041520.n54FKLfj000456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:23:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:23:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041523.n54FNJQP017791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #26 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-04 11:23:16 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346550) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346550) release number and devel subpackage added -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:24:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:24:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041524.n54FOrVO018199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #27 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-04 11:24:52 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346551) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346551) src rpm created acording the las spec file changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041531.n54FVLYU020836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-04 11:31:20 EDT --- iodbc review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041536.n54Fa4Wj005179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #29 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-04 11:36:03 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346554) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346554) src rpm acording to last spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:34:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:34:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041534.n54FYlXA004465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #28 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-04 11:34:46 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346553) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346553) wrong devel description, fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:36:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:36:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041536.n54Faw0o005395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:36:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:36:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:36:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504087] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041536.n54Fa1b6005135@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504087 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:36:00 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041537.n54FbILI005475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #30 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-04 11:37:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > You can find a simple example for creating a devel-subpackage in my flickrnet > package here: > http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/flickrnet/devel/flickrnet.spec?view=markup > > More complete information is at http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-subpack.html > done..hope that it is ok.. > Could you please adjust the release number to a single number (not 1.1; and > please adjust the changelog accordingly) done... > > > If you create some packages for the gdb-debugger I'll have a look at them too! > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 > Paul Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041539.n54FdZpq023514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:39:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041536.n54FaRFi022911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:36:25 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:34:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041534.n54FYndk021813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:34:47 EDT --- CVS done. I uses a shorter short description. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:38:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:38:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504177] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504177 Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Automatically set and update fields with values calculated at runtime. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393609 Additional Comment: This is a new BR of DBIx::Class::DateTime::Epoch. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:40:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:40:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041540.n54FeNLk006902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:40:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041542.n54FgDa0007129@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:42:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498199] Review Request: dynamic-wallpaper - Generates svg wallpaper based on current weather, season and others In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041538.n54Fc2x1005762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498199 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:38:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041541.n54FfLx2024548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 11:41:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504178] New: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mschwendt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-plugins-fc.spec SRPM URL: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/gstreamer-plugins-fc-0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is an input plugin for GStreamer which can play back Future Composer music files from AMIGA. Song-length detection and seek are implemented, too. [...] Example files can be found here - for example ;-) http://xmms-fc.sourceforge.net/favfcmods2.tgz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041546.n54FkAGI026530@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #2 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-04 11:46:09 EDT --- -L/usr/lib64 resp. -L/usr/lib can just be patched out, it's the default anyway. --static-libs and --libtool-libs should just be removed entirely. If software is trying to use them, then we can hack the script to just do the same as for --libs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 15:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041550.n54FoTpi009850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-04 11:50:28 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346558) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346558) libiodbc-3.52.6-multilib.patch This patch should work (apply with -p0). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041607.n54G7tZQ000981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 12:07:54 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc10.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/dvtm.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:05:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:05:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041605.n54G5XaO032523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 12:05:32 EDT --- Okay .. I will remove it .. but I don't think it is bad to keep it there .. rather good. So, is it approved? Or some other issue to fix? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:12:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:12:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041612.n54GCiLr002895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-04 12:12:43 EDT --- cool, worksforme. Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libiodbc/libiodbc.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.6-2.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jun 04 2009 Rex Dieter 3.52.6-2 - iodbc-config multilib patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:17:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:17:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041617.n54GHGcm004729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 --- Comment #12 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 12:17:14 EDT --- cvs import done - all branches Still waiting on https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1425 so that I can tag and build in koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041618.n54GIAtK004902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 12:18:09 EDT --- Good: + Patch seems reliable + Proper RPM group + Package honour RPM_OPT_FLAGS Bad: - No verbatin copy of the LGPL (no blocker) Your package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041616.n54GG1Zc004418@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andreas at bawue.net Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 12:15:59 EDT --- Looks like this package already existed and CVS branches exist for it. It's also in rawhide. For some reason, though, it's not in any of the repositories. That would explain why neither of us caught the problem. I've added the package owner to the CC list for this ticket. After changing the ownership for the existing branches back, the end result is that you own an EL-5 branch of the package. Generally we want consent of package owner before making EL-5 branches, but it's a bit tough to undo so I hope nobody will mind. However, we need to figure out why the package has never been pushed. Andreas, if you simply have no interest in this package and want to relinquish is so that Xavier can get it in the distribution, I can take care of that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041619.n54GJorn005597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 --- Comment #10 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 12:19:49 EDT --- cvs import done - all branches Still waiting on https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1425 so that I can tag and build in koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041627.n54GR277008044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 12:27:01 EDT --- Thanks :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dvtm Short Description: Tiling window management for the console Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504087] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-Helper-FastCGI-ExternalServer - FastCGI daemon start/stop script for using FastCgiExternalServer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041629.n54GTBtR022535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504087 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-04 12:29:10 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:43:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:43:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041643.n54GhJYR026361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 12:43:18 EDT --- Good: + Basename of the SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines. + URL tag shows on proper project home page + Package contains valid license tag + License tag state GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Package contains verbatin copy of the license text + Package contains proper Obsolete/Provides statement for renaming + Package contains no subpackages + Consistently usage of RPM macros + Proper definition of the BuildRoot + BuildRoot will be cleaned on beginning of %clean and %install + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Packaged sources matches with upstream (md5sum: bbf9b8e74b9746d65b1fd1871a665208) + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent for source package + Scratch build on koji works fine. * Files permissions are ok. + Java symlinks for jar files are created + All packaged files are owned by the package. + %doc stanza is small, so we don't need extra subpackage + Package contains proper %Changelog Bad: - Rpmlint complaints on binary rpm: $ rpmlint -i 389-console-1.1.3-2.fc10.x86_64.rpm 389-console.x86_64: E: no-binary The package should be of the noarch architecture because it doesn't contain any binaries. - Debuginfo package is empty I want to suggest, that you should recreate this package as a noarch package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041647.n54GlVd3012921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 12:47:29 EDT --- It may be nice, if you can changed %default into %global if possible. But because this is only a monor issue, I will APPROVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 16:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 12:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041651.n54GpRls028620@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 12:51:24 EDT --- If may be nice, if you can changed the %define into %global if possible. But because this is a minor topic, I can APPRVE your package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:04:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:04:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041704.n54H4ek4031604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #31 from Paul Lange 2009-06-04 13:04:38 EDT --- Maricio, your source tarball includes a folder called 'build' which shouldn't be there. Have you packed it yourself? I checked the tarball from the website and it's not included there. Please replace the tarball with the correct one. Please make the release numbers increasing (latest should be 3). Furthermore we can simplify the ./configure... line through the use of the %configure macro. btw, we are on a good way :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041713.n54HDu1C002524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #5 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 13:13:55 EDT --- > I want to suggest, that you should recreate this package as a > noarch package. I would like to do that. The problem is that the package has a dependency on jss which is not a noarch package. How can I do that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:14:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:14:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494986] Review Request: mysqludf_xql - MySQL UDF library for XML output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041714.n54HEqkW002711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494986 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-04 13:14:50 EDT --- Thanks everyone for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495882] Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041719.n54HJORp021206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-04 13:19:23 EDT --- Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041719.n54HJPWU021231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Bug 495885 depends on bug 495882, which changed state. Bug 495882 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Filter-Transparent-SMTP - A POE filter for SMTP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495882 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495888] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Log4perl - Logging extension for the POE environment. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041718.n54HI8HU020476@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495888 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-04 13:18:07 EDT --- Many thanks Mamoru! I'll try not to break anything ;) I'll try Bodhi to get this package and the others in F10 and F11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:21:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:21:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041721.n54HLpw8005054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #6 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 13:21:50 EDT --- This is only possible, if jss is available for all architectures. If not, please take care, that no debuginfo package may be created, because it make no sense. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041724.n54HOBO7005826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 13:24:10 EDT --- I don't see any ExclusiveArch or ExcludeArch statements in jss, so creating of a noarch package is possible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:32:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:32:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041732.n54HW4jC008554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #8 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 13:32:03 EDT --- I don't know if jss is available for all architectures. jss itself depends on java, nspr, and nss. If those are available, then jss should be available. So if I create a noarch package, and I install 389-console on x86_64, how do I make sure 389-console uses jss.x86_64? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041740.n54HeeZT011404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 13:40:39 EDT --- Unfortunately, I'm not a java guru, so you make ask on the fedora-java-list about mulitlib behaviour of jni environments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:54:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:54:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041754.n54HsKJQ031722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 13:54:19 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:52:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:52:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041752.n54Hq81b031342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 13:52:07 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 17:57:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:57:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041757.n54Hvb1F032740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 13:57:36 EDT --- We are waiting for https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1425 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 18:11:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:11:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041811.n54IBRkB019499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Rick L Vinyard Jr changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rick L Vinyard Jr 2009-06-04 14:11:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gimpfx-foundry Short Description: Additional GIMP plugins Owners: rvinyard Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 18:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041835.n54IZZsg025688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-04 14:35:34 EDT --- Some first comments: Good: + Basename of SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag contains proper project homepage + Package contains most recent release of the software Bad: - Please use %glogal instead of %define - Could not download source tar ball via spectool -g -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 18:50:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:50:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504178] Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-fc - Future Composer input plugin for GStreamer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041850.n54IoQI1028969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504178 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-04 14:50:25 EDT --- > - Please use %glogal instead of %define Why? > - Could not download source tar ball via spectool -g Works for me. How does it fail for you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 18:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041852.n54Iq37c014183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #8 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-04 14:52:02 EDT --- But is the package approved? If so, I can go ahead and do the CVS request, then cvs-import, while the tagging issue is being resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 19:43:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 15:43:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251805] Review Request: postgresql-orafce - Implementation of some Oracle functions into PostgreSQL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906041943.n54JhKtb008005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805 --- Comment #18 from Devrim GUNDUZ 2009-06-04 15:43:15 EDT --- 3.0 version is about to be released, and I will update the package then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 20:07:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504219] New: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - GMP library as replacement for Math::BigInt routines Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - GMP library as replacement for Math::BigInt routines https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504219 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - GMP library as replacement for Math::BigInt routines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: redhat-bugzilla at linuxnetz.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com, scheck at etes.de Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/perl-Math-BigInt-GMP-1.24-1.src.rpm Description: This package is a drop-in replacement module for Math::BigInt's core and Math::BigInt::Calc.pm using the GNU arbitrary precision library (GMP). If you're using the Net::SSH::Perl package, this package will increase the speed of Net::SSH::Perl significant. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 20:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] New: Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 Summary: Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ajax at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/libdlo/libdlo.spec SRPM URL: http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/libdlo/libdlo-0.1.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: An open-source implementation of DisplayLink USB graphics support. This library will discover and connect to DisplayLink USB graphics chips, and allow for developers to support DisplayLink devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 20:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042031.n54KV5VO003088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 16:31:04 EDT --- pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 20:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042030.n54KUEKx002849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 16:30:13 EDT --- pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042109.n54L9e6X010473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:09:38 EDT --- python-feedcache-1.3-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:09:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:09:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 462529] Review Request: python-feedcache - Wrapper for Mark Pilgrim's FeedParser module which caches feed content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042109.n54L9iI0010515@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=462529 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.3-2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:08:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:08:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042108.n54L8sZs010314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:08:53 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update dssi-vst'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5820 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:09:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:09:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042109.n54L9QfT010431@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Bug 478922 depends on bug 478921, which changed state. Bug 478921 Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:09:25 EDT --- globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:08:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042108.n54L8nZD010274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:08:47 EDT --- python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-wsgiref'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5819 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:10:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042110.n54LANmx026885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #84 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:10:22 EDT --- mumble-1.1.8-13.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042110.n54LAVJW026952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.8-13.fc9 |1.1.8-13.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:11:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042111.n54LBYUe027234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.10-1.fc9 |2.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042109.n54L9VWP026333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.10-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042110.n54LA1S5010736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #83 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:09:57 EDT --- mumble-1.1.8-13.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042112.n54LCcpb011819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 --- Comment #85 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:12:37 EDT --- mumble-1.1.8-13.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042110.n54LA7HB011135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.1.8-13.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042111.n54LBLgN011497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:11:20 EDT --- perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497441] Review Request: mumble - Voice chat application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042112.n54LCjL0011887@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497441 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.8-13.fc11 |1.1.8-13.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042111.n54LBT2o011539@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:11:28 EDT --- globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042113.n54LDvdJ012114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.4-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042112.n54LCVna011763@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |5.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042112.n54LCuC9011943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Bug 499306 depends on bug 499300, which changed state. Bug 499300 Summary: Review Request: zita-convolver - Convolution engine library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499300 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:12:55 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042112.n54LCRiC011719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Bug 478930 depends on bug 478921, which changed state. Bug 478921 Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:12:25 EDT --- globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:16:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042116.n54LG9YO029068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:16:08 EDT --- mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:17:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:17:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042117.n54LHS1o029396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:17:28 EDT --- xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042115.n54LF6mu028614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:15:03 EDT --- xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:17:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042117.n54LHXvN029442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.3-1.fc10 |1.4.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042115.n54LFHd8028777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:15:16 EDT --- globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042115.n54LFMVr028816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.1-2.fc11 |5.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042114.n54LE6Vb028039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:14:03 EDT --- xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042116.n54LGwcK029267@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:16:57 EDT --- xml-security-c-1.4.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042116.n54LGb5H029161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.1-2.fc9 |5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:17:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:17:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042117.n54LHH1B029346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.10-1.fc11 |2.10-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042114.n54LEAp0028079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.4.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:13:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:13:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042113.n54LD1Z3027779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8.1-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:16:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:16:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042116.n54LGDDC029106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.5.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042115.n54LFBQQ028662@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.4.3-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:14:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:14:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468229] Review Request: python-wsgiref - WSGI (PEP 333) Reference Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042114.n54LEHjO028112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468229 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:14:16 EDT --- python-wsgiref-0.1.2-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-wsgiref'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5857 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042115.n54LFqJF029019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:15:51 EDT --- ytree-1.92-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ytree'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5874 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:13:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:13:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042113.n54LDrxi027960@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Bug 478925 depends on bug 478921, which changed state. Bug 478921 Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:13:52 EDT --- globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042115.n54LFcPf028961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:15:37 EDT --- python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-webflash'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5871 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042118.n54LIec5014289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.1-1.fc9 |0.8.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJZnh014458@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.5.1-2.fc11 |2.5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:17:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478922] Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042117.n54LHD10013634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:17:12 EDT --- globus-ftp-control-2.10-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:18:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:18:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042118.n54LIxwp014354@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:18:58 EDT --- mingw32-hunspell-1.2.8-6.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJAgZ014398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:19:10 EDT --- globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492895] Review Request: xml-security-c - C++ Implementation of W3C security standards for XML In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042117.n54LH3LB013596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492895 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.0-2.fc11 |1.4.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:16:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:16:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478930] Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042116.n54LGWrQ013427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:16:31 EDT --- globus-rls-client-5.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042117.n54LHNjc013669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:17:23 EDT --- python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-gnutls'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-5897 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:16:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:16:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042116.n54LGr6w013506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:16:52 EDT --- python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-gnutls'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5891 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502534] Review Request: mingw32-libgnurx - MinGW Regex library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJVEL030916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502534 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:19:30 EDT --- mingw32-libgnurx-2.5.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:18:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:18:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042118.n54LIaMs030605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:18:35 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJLUd030833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:19:20 EDT --- jconv-0.8.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:22:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:22:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042122.n54LM8KT032443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:22:07 EDT --- xmlfy-1.4.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503175] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GPG - Perl Object Oriented Interface to GnuPG In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042120.n54LK7xW031420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503175 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:20:07 EDT --- perl-Crypt-GPG-1.63-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499306] Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJPrV030877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.1-1.fc11 |0.8.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:18:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:18:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042118.n54LIn7n030653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:18:48 EDT --- globus-gass-transfer-3.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJEqO030792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.4-1.fc10 |3.4-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478925] Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042118.n54LIr0A030693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.4-1.fc11 |3.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:19:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502387] Review Request: mingw32-hunspell - MinGW Windows spell checker and morphological analyzer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042119.n54LJ41u030746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502387 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2.8-6.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:22:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:22:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493236] Review Request: xmlfy - Convert text/UTF-8 based output into XML format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042122.n54LMD8j016218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493236 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.4.3-1.fc11 |1.4.3-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042124.n54LOAb8016638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:24:09 EDT --- ytree-1.92-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ytree'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5967 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042123.n54LNspt001286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 17:23:54 EDT --- python-webflash-0.1-0.1.a9.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-webflash'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-5959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:36:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:36:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042136.n54LaXv8004628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-04 17:36:31 EDT --- ######################################### # MUST ITEMS ######################################### --> rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: [lvillani at localhost Download]$ rpmlint libiodbc-3.52.6-2.fc12.i586.rpm libiodbc-debuginfo-3.52.6-2.fc12.i586.rpm libiodbc-devel-3.52.6-2.fc12.i586.rpm libiodbc.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized iODBC Driver Manager libiodbc-debuginfo.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/src/debug/libiodbc-3.52.6/include/iodbcunix.h libiodbc-devel.i586: W: summary-not-capitalized header files and libraries for iODBC development 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The first and the last line can be ignored, the package is called that way I'm not sure about spurious-executable-perm in debuginfo package... --> The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines Status: PASS --> The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Status: PASS --> The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines Status: PASS --> The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Status: PASS --> The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Status: PASS --> If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Status: PASS --> The spec file must be written in American English. Status: PASS --> The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Status: PASS --> The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: [lvillani at localhost SPECS]$ md5sum libiodbc-3.52.6.tar.gz ../SOURCES/libiodbc-3.52.6.tar.gz 761ad547467bd63ac0b2b4f3ee4b5afb libiodbc-3.52.6.tar.gz e218721832e28fff0259bffa137626c1 ../SOURCES/libiodbc-3.52.6.tar.gz --> The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Status: PASS --> If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Status: PASS --> All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Status: PASS --> The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Status: PASS --> Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Status: PASS --> If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Status: PASS --> A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Status: PASS --> A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Status: PASS --> Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: See MUST item #1 --> Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Status: PASS --> Each package must consistently use macros. Status: PASS --> The package must contain code, or permissable content. Status: PASS --> Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Status: PASS --> If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Status: PASS --> Header files must be in a -devel package. Status: PASS --> Static libraries must be in a -static package. Status: PASS Additional comments: No static libraries --> Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Status: PASS --> If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Status: PASS --> In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Status: PASS --> Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Status: PASS --> Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: The admin subpackage includes what seems to be a GTK application but I don't see any .desktop file. --> Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Status: PASS --> At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Status: PASS --> All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Status: PASS ######################################### # SHOULD ITEMS ######################################### --> If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Status: PASS --> The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Status: *** FAIL *** --> The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Status: PASS --> The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Status: PASS Additional comments: The scratch build(s) confirm that it builds on all supported architectures --> The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: It's a library, I need a project that links to this library to test it... --> If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Status: PASS --> Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. Status: PASS --> The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb.If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Status: PASS Generated with reviewtool 0.0.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 21:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 17:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042138.n54Lc3TP004994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-04 17:38:02 EDT --- Can you also capitalize name, version and release tags please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:05:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:05:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042205.n54M5Ari025388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lpoetter at redhat.com --- Comment #16 from Lennart Poettering 2009-06-04 18:05:08 EDT --- Would love to see this in Rawhide. Would make it much easier for me to test the new UPnP code in PulseAudio... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:23:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042223.n54MNWEK028486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:23:31 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042221.n54MLYiZ028207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:21:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042225.n54MPuss013059@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:25:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042222.n54MMklU012357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:22:44 EDT --- CVS done. Don't forget to fix up the URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042225.n54MP89F012874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:25:07 EDT --- FYI, we haven't used or paid any attention to "Cvextras Commits" for some time now. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042226.n54MQ7kg029374@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504219] Review Request: perl-Math-BigInt-GMP - GMP library as replacement for Math::BigInt routines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042229.n54MTIg4013390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504219 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:29:16 EDT --- > yum info perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Loaded plugins: changelog Available Packages Name : perl-Math-BigInt-GMP Arch : x86_64 Version : 1.24 Release : 2.fc11 Size : 43 k Repo : fedora Summary : Math::BigInt::GMP Perl module URL : http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-BigInt-GMP/ License : GPL+ or Artistic Description: This package contains a replacement (drop-in) module for Math::BigInt's : core, Math::BigInt::Calc.pm. It needs the new versions of Math::BigInt and : Math::BigFloat as they are from Perl 5.7.x onwards. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:30:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:30:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042230.n54MUsAG013985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:30:53 EDT --- 404 on the src.rpm link. I used http://ajax.fedorapeople.org/libdlo/libdlo-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 22:57:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 18:57:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042257.n54MviCd002505@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 18:57:43 EDT --- Builds fine, rpmlint says only: libdlo.x86_64: W: no-documentation libdlo-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation which would be OK, except that the main package needs the COPYING file and there does seem to be some development documentation in the Guide-v104.pdf file which should probably be in the -devel package. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 2a3af6e035c03f61dd170514271d81995c31018d13247436a3b8bfc37e2c3da0 libdlo-0.1.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. X license text included in tarball but not in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * final provides and requires are sane: libdlo-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libdlo.so.0()(64bit) libdlo = 0.1.0-1.fc11 libdlo(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc11 = /sbin/ldconfig libdlo.so.0()(64bit) libusb-0.1.so.4()(64bit) libdlo-devel-0.1.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libdlo-devel = 0.1.0-1.fc11 libdlo-devel(x86-64) = 0.1.0-1.fc11 = libdlo = 0.1.0-1.fc11 libdlo.so.0()(64bit) * shared libraries are installed: ldconfig called properly. unversioned .so links are in the -devel package. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (ldconfig). * code, not content. * header is in the -devel package. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:12:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492715] Review Request: KRadio4 - V4L/V4L2-Radio Application for KDE4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042312.n54NCak0005479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492715 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042315.n54NFokR022171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-04 19:15:49 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libiodbc/libiodbc.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/libiodbc/libiodbc-3.52.6-3.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Jun 04 2009 Rex Dieter 3.52.6-3 - capitalize Name,Summary,Version tags - -devel: capitalize Summary - fix spurious permissions on header files - refresh upstream source - -admin,-devel: add %%defattr(...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504243] New: Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504243 Summary: Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://getid3.sourceforge.net/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: promac at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Spec URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/SPECS/php-getid3.spec SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/php-getid3-1.7.9-1.fc10.src.rpm getID3() is a PHP script that extracts useful information (such as ID3 tags, bitrate, playtime, etc.) from MP3s & other multimedia file formats (Ogg, WMA, WMV, ASF, WAV, AVI, AAC, VQF, FLAC, MusePack, Real, QuickTime, Monkey's Audio, MIDI and more). -------------------------------------------------------------- This package is used by some web applications, such as ampache, which is under review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:29:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:29:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042329.n54NT42H024635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 19:29:02 EDT --- Does not build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394170 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042336.n54Navug010119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 19:36:56 EDT --- perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042337.n54Nb1lO010152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-04 19:37:01 EDT --- perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496133] Review Request: EMBOSS - The European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042346.n54NkH9G028338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496133 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 19:46:15 EDT --- Please clear the Whiteboard when this package is ready to show back up in the review queue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042356.n54NuO3Y013776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #6 from D Haley 2009-06-04 19:56:23 EDT --- That build looked OK to me, am I missing something, or were you referring to my other package: Bug 481355 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 4 23:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 19:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906042358.n54NwYj2014196@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #65 from Stephen Lau 2009-06-04 19:58:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #64) > In my opinion, there is a problem both with the license advertising and the > installation of recommended plugins. > > That's rather annoying for a newly created users to have all sort of > advertising, specially if the user known well the sunbird license and/or other > well known modules. I think that previously, the same kind of problem was > raised with firefox which ends to have a less "interactive with end-user" > advertise. > (I remember some discussion on GPL not been an EULA that end-user need to > accept/reject to use the software but a pure information). (full disclosure: I'm a POTI employee working on Songbird - I think I said that up above too, but worth refreshing here so it's clear) The EULA is displayed to the user here since it's possible they might be downloading some closed-source/binary-only add-ons. The EULA also notes that while the player is open source and free, the branding (Songbird icon, name, etc.) are trademarks of POTI, Inc. While this second part is similar to Firefox/Mozilla and arguably could be moved to a "hat"-like notification system like Mozilla has done with Firefox, it was still worth having the EULA agreement for the user to protect them and give them the rights to use the binary-only add-ons for free (since Songbird can and does license them to partners who build their own players on top of the Songbird source) The binary only add-ons in question are Quicktime, Windows Media, and iPod. The Quicktime & Windows Media add-ons are platform-specific to Windows & Mac - so they won't be exposed to RH/Fedora users, and the iPod add-on is soon to be open sourced... so this might be a non-issue in a matter of weeks once I'm done open sourcing the iPod add-on. So all that aside, POTI would feel more comfortable having the EULA window and agreement there... it's a requirement for us on Windows/Mac due to the proprietary binary only components, and we'd rather not get into special casing stuff just for Linux since it's entirely possible we could deliver binary-only components again in the future for Linux users. (And, as always, these add-ons will always be optional... the user is free to opt-out of not installing any of them) > So to sum-up, I would appreciate to have less interactive information on newly > created user (so songbird could be usable directly). But this shouldn't prevent > this package to be approved. cheers.. and thanks for the review! -steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 00:12:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:12:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050012.n550CYcm016981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 20:12:33 EDT --- Weird; it does look OK. I can't really explain what happened; I guess I shouldn't do builds late at night. Please accept my apologies; I'll try to look at this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 00:53:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 20:53:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492816] Review Request: squeal - A SQL-like interface for the command line In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050053.n550rEZX025006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492816 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: show - A |Review Request: squeal - A |SQL-like interface for the |SQL-like interface for the |command line |command line --- Comment #12 from Dave Malcolm 2009-06-04 20:53:12 EDT --- (renaming this request) Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/squeal.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/squeal-0.4-3.src.rpm Successful scratch build in Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394231 and I've fixed the rpmlint warnings. (I put in a conditional for python-setuptools-devel vs python-setuptools as I'm currently doing this on a RHEL box; I can easily remove that if need be on import) Release notes here BTW: https://fedorahosted.org/squeal/wiki/ReleaseNotes/0.4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 01:32:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 21:32:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504243] Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050132.n551WRPe017114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504243 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-06-04 21:32:26 EDT --- I'll try and get this done by tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 02:11:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:11:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504243] Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050211.n552B3oj010034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504243 --- Comment #2 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-04 22:11:02 EDT --- Thanks. ampache is using the beta version, 2.0.0b4. Therefore, I also packaged 2.0.0b5. SRPM URL: http://orion.lcg.ufrj.br/RPMS/src/php-getid3-2.0.0b5-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 02:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050227.n552R3KG030286@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 22:27:02 EDT --- Thanks :) Will change before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-Apptools Short Description: Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 02:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050227.n552RvR7014521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-04 22:27:56 EDT --- Thanks :) Will change before importing. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-EnthoughtBase Short Description: Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 02:42:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:42:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050242.n552gTuU018376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-04 22:42:28 EDT --- Thanks a lot for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: toot2 Short Description: Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 02:59:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 22:59:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050259.n552xKp5022426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-04 22:59:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > ! the package installs an icon file but does not have any icon cache > handling scriptlets. See > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache Ahh. Sloppy me. Thanks for pointing this out. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/xsynth-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: 0.9.2-2 - Add icon cache scriptlet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:01:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:01:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050301.n5531OxA023015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-04 23:01:23 EDT --- Thank you for the review. Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/nekobee-dssi.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: 0.1.7-2 - Add icon cache scriptlet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:04:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:04:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050304.n5534Bci023262@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-04 23:04:10 EDT --- Ah, well, using a real release is of course a fine idea, especially when you're the upstream and can drop a release any time you like. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050342.n553gZ01014282@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 478926 depends on bug 478921, which changed state. Bug 478921 Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478926 depends on bug 478922, which changed state. Bug 478922 Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478926 depends on bug 478925, which changed state. Bug 478925 Summary: Review Request: globus-gass-transfer - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Transfer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478925 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-04 23:42:34 EDT --- I reviewed this package. There is an rpmlint issue - koji rawhide build is fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394331 - rpmlints on the RPM's globus-gass-copy-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation globus-gass-copy-progs.x86_64: W: no-documentation can be ignored * however, when I run rpmlint on the installed package I get these additional rpmlints globus-gass-copy.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_gass_copy.so.2.2.14 /usr/lib64/libglobus_ftp_control.so.1 globus-gass-copy.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libglobus_gass_copy.so.2.2.14 /usr/lib64/libglobus_gssapi_error.so.2 [lots of them] These kind of rpmlints are also present for globus-ftp-client. Sorry for not noticing this before. Are these fixable? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050348.n553mjbS032578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-04 23:48:44 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050348.n553maC2032533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-04 23:48:35 EDT --- Package approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:56:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:56:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050356.n553uE77017344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-04 23:56:13 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nekobee-dssi Short Description: Acid sounds synthesizer Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 03:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 23:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050354.n553smIx016712@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-04 23:54:47 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xsynth-dssi Short Description: Classic-analog style software synthesizer Owners: oget Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 04:19:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:19:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050419.n554Jctw022756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 A S Alam changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 04:24:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:24:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050424.n554ODVi007958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-05 00:24:12 EDT --- I think this is fixed already. If I download the RPM from your scratch build I get: [ellert at ellert ~]$ rpm -q --requires -p globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm /sbin/ldconfig /sbin/ldconfig globus-common libc.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit) libglobus_common.so.0()(64bit) libglobus_ftp_client.so.1()(64bit) libglobus_gass_copy.so.2()(64bit) libglobus_gass_transfer.so.2()(64bit) libglobus_io.so.3()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) As you can see it does not list libglobus_ftp_control.so.1 and libglobus_gssapi_error.so.2 that your rpmlint output complains about. So these unused-direct-shlib-dependency issues are not present in this RPM as far as I can see. Also the log says: /usr/bin/gcc -Wl,--as-needed -shared .libs/globus_gass_copy.o .libs/globus_gass_copy_glob.o -L/usr/lib64 -lglobus_ftp_client -lglobus_gass_transfer -lglobus_ftp_control -lglobus_io -lglobus_gssapi_error -lglobus_gss_assist -lglobus_gssapi_gsi -lglobus_gsi_proxy_core -lglobus_gsi_credential -lglobus_gsi_callback -lglobus_oldgaa -lglobus_gsi_sysconfig -lglobus_gsi_cert_utils -lglobus_openssl -lglobus_xio -lglobus_openssl_error -lglobus_callout -lglobus_proxy_ssl -lglobus_common -lm -lssl -lcrypto -ldl -lz -lltdl -lpthread -m64 -mtune=generic -m64 -m64 -Wl,-soname -Wl,libglobus_gass_copy.so.2 -o .libs/libglobus_gass_copy.so.2.2.14 The -Wl,--as-needed should fix this - and it looks as it does. If I run rpmlint on the installed packages here I get no warnings: [ellert at ellert ~]$ rpmlint globus-ftp-client 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ellert at ellert ~]$ rpmlint globus-gass-copy 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 04:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 00:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504177] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050427.n554Rtr9024312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504177 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-05 00:27:54 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1393609 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 65f6772df56f6378edec315b22886f870d6bc3f1 DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=14, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.23 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.27 CPU) + Package perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.03-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(DBIx::Class::DynamicDefault) = 0.03 Requires: perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 05:29:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 01:29:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050529.n555TAKK001816@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-05 01:29:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: erlang-erlsyslog Short Description: Syslog facility for Erlang Owners: peter Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 05:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 01:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050531.n555V3se002386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-05 01:31:02 EDT --- Ahh, sorry. I just installed F-11 and my mock configuration wasn't picking up the new globus-core build from updates. I was building against the oldest one. So there are no issues anywhere except in my mock configuration. --------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-gass-copy) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 05:54:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 01:54:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050554.n555sxjA006481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? Bug 478931 depends on bug 478929, which changed state. Bug 478929 Summary: Review Request: globus-usage - Globus Toolkit - Usage Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478929 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478931 depends on bug 467237, which changed state. Bug 467237 Summary: Review Request: globus-gssapi-gsi - Globus Toolkit - GSSAPI library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467237 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478931 depends on bug 478921, which changed state. Bug 478921 Summary: Review Request: globus-io - Globus Toolkit - uniform I/O interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478921 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 478931 depends on bug 478930, which changed state. Bug 478930 Summary: Review Request: globus-rls-client - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478930 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-05 01:54:57 EDT --- This one was quite different from the other globus packages. Here is my review: - package builds in koji rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394353 ? I don't know if this BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 is really required, since $ grep -rl gssapi * pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in Is it an upstream error or am I missing something? * Afaik %setup is supposed to be used only once in a specfile. So %setup -q -n %{_name}-%{version} %setup -D -T -q -n %{_name}-%{version} -a 1 should be replaced by %setup -q -n %{_name}-%{version} -a 1 ? Actually, why are you not making globus_rls_server_setup a package on its own? ! It would be good to briefly explain what Source{1,2,3} are for where you declare them. * rpmlint complains globus-rls-server.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/globus/setup/SXXrls.in "@SHELL@" globus-rls-server.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/globus/setup/SXXrls.in 0644 globus-rls-server.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/globus-rls-server.conf 0600 globus-rls-server.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/globus-rls-server Any words for these? ! Please preserve the timestamp of %{SOURCE3} in %install ! There is some html documentation under ./Doc that can be packaged. Also there is an INSTALL.html ! I don't know how serious they are but Doc/man/man8/globus-rls-server.8 Doc/html/globus-rls-server.html server.c contain references to /usr/local. You might want to fix them. ? /usr/share/globus/setup/setup-globus-common.pl defines perl location as /usr/lib/perl/ Will this be a problem? ? Are the tests under ./test worth running in %check ? ! The package owns the directory /usr/share/globus/packages/setup/ I wasn't sure if this is intentional (or if its contents should actually go to /usr/share/globus/packages/globus_rls_server_setup/) and just wanted to bring it into your attention. * The scriplets are different than the ones in the guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets (See the Requires(*) stuff) * %{_initrddir}/%{name} does not contain all the required actions http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Required_Actions ? The "status" action in %{_initrddir}/%{name} has the port number hard-coded. Shouldn't the port number be taken from %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}.conf ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 06:02:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:02:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504177] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050602.n55627v8008488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504177 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-05 02:02:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault Short Description: Automatically set and update fields Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 06:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504177] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050602.n55628L2025051@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504177 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 06:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 02:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050625.n556PAMA012770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-05 02:25:09 EDT --- Thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-gass-copy Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 07:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 03:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050713.n557DGnn022151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-05 03:13:14 EDT --- Sorry it took so long, but I wonder why I did not get notified about your latest comment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 08:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] New: Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 Summary: Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mailody.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mailody-1.5.0-0.1.alfa1.fc11.src.rpm Description: mailody is yet another mail client. While it uses the akonadi backend from KDE4 it can handle IMAP and SMTP only. It's actually some sort of mixture betweend the popular KMail and Thunderbird mail clients and can share some settings with the former. rpmlint shows nothing on the spec and the srpm, but the following on the rpm: mailody.i586: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/doc/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common Not sure, what that means or what I should do about it and when I google for it I find 'no better way to do it' as well as people who fixed it (didn't find out how, tho). Successfully did a mockbuild for fedora-1{0,1}-i386. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 08:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459874] Review Request: zeromq - Fast messaging system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050850.n558oXXH028172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459874 --- Comment #23 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-05 04:50:29 EDT --- Ver. 0.6.1. is out. I'll post new spec and srpm in this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 08:52:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 04:52:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050852.n558qQCo028592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 09:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050926.n559Q68d005302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #12 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-05 05:26:03 EDT --- REVIEW FOR a114ac5ea879e928955eec89863f9009 olpc-kbdshim-6-1.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/olpc-kbdshim-* 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. FIX - MUST: The package does not meet the Packaging Guidelines, explained below. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible (could be a little better though) N/A - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on i386 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates: none except in docdir. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. TBD - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Issues: - MINOR: BuildRoot: should be %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag (minor, but for a new package we should do this properly I think) - MAJOR: BuildArch: i386 is wrong, I think you want %{ix86} or no BuildArch at all. - MAJOR: Requires: hal is missing for proper function and dir ownership - MINOR: Description: line breaks at 80 characters - MAJOR: RPM_OPT_FLAGS not honored: cc -Wall -O2 -g -DVERSION=6 $(pkg-config --cflags hal) $(pkg-config --cflags glib-2.0) $(pkg-config --cflags dbus-glib-1) olpc-kbdshim-hal.c $(pkg-config --libs hal) $(pkg-config --libs glib-2.0) $(pkg-config --libs dbus-glib-1) -o olpc-kbdshim-hal cc -Wall -O2 -g -DVERSION=6 olpc-kbdshim.c -o olpc-kbdshim - MAJOR: Preserve timestamps during install by adding "-p", see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Questions: - Is the non-hal version still developed? If so, this package should be named olpc-kbdshim-hal, so that both version could be packaged - Is there any way to tag or mark the checkouts, so we can later get a specific version and verify it's md5? For a git snapshot this package is not named properly, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages - How can I test the program's functionality? I'm especially interested in the brightness because this is something I need for LXDE and Xfce as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 09:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050936.n559a0We024114@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #66 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-05 05:35:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #65) > stuff just for Linux since it's entirely possible we could deliver binary-only > components again in the future for Linux users. I don't want to get much involved with this review, but why not just let gstreamer deal with the codecs mess? And if you want to provide some binary-only codecs, why not to make repository of them and let PackageKit use it as (optional of course) additional source of codecs? But, that's just off-topic to the issue of EULA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 09:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050948.n559m2lT027226@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 05:48:01 EDT --- libint-1.1.4-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libint-1.1.4-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 09:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 05:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906050950.n559oGc7011098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 05:50:15 EDT --- libint-1.1.4-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libint-1.1.4-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 10:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 06:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051018.n55AIuZi001827@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-05 06:18:55 EDT --- I have contacted upstream for the license issue, and shall keep you updated. (as a reminder, the upstream Web site is: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/index.html) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 12:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051227.n55CR8Hm030306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-05 08:27:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > This one was quite different from the other globus packages. Here is my review: > > - package builds in koji rawhide > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394353 > > ? I don't know if this > BuildRequires: globus-gssapi-gsi-devel >= 4 > is really required, since > $ grep -rl gssapi * > pkgdata/pkg_data_src.gpt.in > Is it an upstream error or am I missing something? Yes, this is a bogus requirement stated in the upstream package description file - fixed (patch updated too) > * Afaik %setup is supposed to be used only once in a specfile. So > %setup -q -n %{_name}-%{version} > %setup -D -T -q -n %{_name}-%{version} -a 1 > should be replaced by > %setup -q -n %{_name}-%{version} -a 1 You can have as many %setup lines you want as long as all except the first one has a -D flag in order not the trigger the deletion of already unpacked sources Quoting http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-specref-macros.html "The -D option is used to direct %setup to not delete the build directory prior to unpacking the sources. This option is used when more than one source archive is to be unpacked into the build directory, normally with the -b or -a options." > ? Actually, why are you not making globus_rls_server_setup a package on its > own? See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus#Setup_packages and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Globus#Globus_package_that_provides_both_a_library_and_programs_and_that_has_a_corresponding_setup_package The example above is from globus-common which already does the same (packaging globus-common and globus-common-setup in the same SRPM). > ! It would be good to briefly explain what Source{1,2,3} are for where you > declare them. Comments added. > * rpmlint complains > globus-rls-server.x86_64: E: wrong-script-interpreter > /usr/share/globus/setup/SXXrls.in "@SHELL@" > globus-rls-server.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/globus/setup/SXXrls.in 0644 > globus-rls-server.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/globus-rls-server.conf 0600 > globus-rls-server.x86_64: W: no-reload-entry > /etc/rc.d/init.d/globus-rls-server > Any words for these? I removed the SXXrls.in file from the package - it is not useful for the RPM package anyway since the RPM uses a %{SOURCE2} as the init.d script instead. The configuration file is intentionally non-readable by non-root users since it contains information about database username and password. reload entry added to init.d script. It is empty since reloading is not supported - as mandated by the guidelines. > ! Please preserve the timestamp of %{SOURCE3} in %install OK - Done for %{SOURCE2} as well. > ! There is some html documentation under ./Doc that can be packaged. Also there > is an INSTALL.html The INSTALL.html file would be confusing to users since it contains information about GPT and how to build from source which is not relevant when installing from the RPM. The relevant part of the post-installation instructions are available in %{SOURCE3} which is installed. > ! I don't know how serious they are but > Doc/man/man8/globus-rls-server.8 > Doc/html/globus-rls-server.html > server.c > contain references to /usr/local. You might want to fix them. This is fixed by these lines already present in the spec file: # Fix hardcoded default locations sed 's!/usr/local/etc!/etc!g' -i server.c sed 's!/usr/local/etc!/etc!g' -i Doc/man/man8/globus-rls-server.8 > ? /usr/share/globus/setup/setup-globus-common.pl defines perl location as > /usr/lib/perl/ > Will this be a problem? When using GPT as installed from the Fedora RPM the GPT perl module is already in the default module path - so it will be found. The additions to the perl include path of the $GPT_LOCATION/lib/perl directory (where they would be by default in a configure, make, make install type installation) does not break anything when using the RPM version. > ? Are the tests under ./test worth running in %check ? The test requires a postgres server where you are allowed to create and modify tables - not something you want to do during an RPM build. > ! The package owns the directory > /usr/share/globus/packages/setup/ > I wasn't sure if this is intentional (or if its contents should actually go to > /usr/share/globus/packages/globus_rls_server_setup/) and just wanted to bring > it into your attention. This is intentional. > * The scriplets are different than the ones in the guidelines: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets > (See the Requires(*) stuff) The scriptlet requires are added. > * %{_initrddir}/%{name} does not contain all the required actions > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Required_Actions The missing actions added (see also the rpmlint section above). > ? The "status" action in %{_initrddir}/%{name} has the port number hard-coded. > Shouldn't the port number be taken from %{_sysconfdir}/%{name}.conf ? Fixed. New version: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc10.src.rpm http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/repos/globus/info/new/globus-rls-server.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 12:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051245.n55Cjuf9002353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 08:45:53 EDT --- wordnet-3.0-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordnet-3.0-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 12:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051246.n55Ck1iQ002416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 08:46:00 EDT --- wordnet-3.0-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordnet-3.0-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 12:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 08:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] New: Review Request: AGReader Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: AGReader https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 Summary: Review Request: AGReader Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: limb at jcomserv.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora A viewer for the UNIX console which can read and display AmigaGuide files. It supports all of the v39 AmigaGuide specification possible and supports a large subset of the v40 specifications. SRPM: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AGReader/AGReader-1.2-5.fc10.src.rpm SPEC: http://zanoni.jcomserv.net/fedora/AGReader/AGReader.spec This package was in Fedora previously, and has been orphaned long enough that it requires a new review. The only problems I have found are that two doc files aren't UTF-8, but they're example AmigaGuide files, and should be left as they are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 13:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051350.n55Don3f016634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #13 from Paul Fox 2009-06-05 09:50:45 EDT --- many thanks! > > Issues: > - MINOR: BuildRoot: should be > %(mktemp -ud %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-XXXXXX) > see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag > (minor, but for a new package we should do this properly I think) fixed. > > - MAJOR: BuildArch: i386 is wrong, I think you want %{ix86} or no BuildArch at > all. fixed. > > - MAJOR: Requires: hal is missing for proper function and dir ownership fixed. > > - MINOR: Description: line breaks at 80 characters i'm not sure what you mean. are you saying my line breaks shouldn't be there? won't that make the spec file unreadable? > > - MAJOR: RPM_OPT_FLAGS not honored: > cc -Wall -O2 -g -DVERSION=6 $(pkg-config --cflags hal) $(pkg-config --cflags > glib-2.0) $(pkg-config --cflags dbus-glib-1) olpc-kbdshim-hal.c > $(pkg-config --libs hal) $(pkg-config --libs glib-2.0) $(pkg-config --libs > dbus-glib-1) -o olpc-kbdshim-hal > cc -Wall -O2 -g -DVERSION=6 olpc-kbdshim.c -o olpc-kbdshim fixed. > > - MAJOR: Preserve timestamps during install by adding "-p", see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps fixed, (though i'm opposed on principle. i think the usefulness of timestamps is subverted almost entirely by making it appear as if files are older than they actually are. but i'll adapt, i guess. :-) > > > Questions: > - Is the non-hal version still developed? If so, this package should be named > olpc-kbdshim-hal, so that both version could be packaged no, only the hal version is being maintained. i've removed the commented lines in the spec file, and added a note to the README noting the existence of the non-HAL version, just in case someone wants it. > > - Is there any way to tag or mark the checkouts, so we can later get a specific > version and verify it's md5? For a git snapshot this package is not named > properly, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages i'll research this. i confess it's a little confusing as the maintainer to be doing a release based on a sandbox, rather than on a tarball. can you perhaps point me at a (simple) git-based package that does this correctly? a template would help me here. > > - How can I test the program's functionality? I'm especially interested in the > brightness because this is something I need for LXDE and Xfce as well. there's no configuration: after installation and a reboot, the following things should work: - with any grab key pressed, both the touchpad and the arrow keys should cause scrolling. on a USB keyboard, the "windows" keys will act as grab keys. - the rotate and brightness keys should "just work". these keys cause the olpc-rotate and olpc-brightness scripts in /usr/bin to be invoked. - when the screen is rotated, the action of the touchpad will be rotated as well. the action of the "d-pad" arrow keys on the screen bezel will also be rotated to match. it's possible for the touchpad and arrow actions to get out of sync with the screen if X crashes, but the next use of the rotate button will fix this. that's it. you should feel free to test on the current package (URL above), since none of the current review comments have affected its operation. i'll do a new package when i've resolved the "description" and tagging issues still open above. okay? thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 13:58:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:58:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051358.n55DwWQj003856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: AGReader |Review Request: AGReader - | |Console reader for viewing | |AmigaGuide files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 13:31:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 09:31:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051331.n55DV6E4020533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 Dan Williams changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Dan Williams 2009-06-05 09:31:05 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mobile-broadband-provider-info Short Description: Mobile broadband provider database Owners: dcbw Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051411.n55EBvRH008470@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-05 10:11:56 EDT --- Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet-0.43-4.fc11.src.rpm - Added new icon cache scriptlets - Added optflags - Changed license to GPLv3+ - Removed manually gzip of manpage Hope its all fixed now =) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051422.n55EMJHS011854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 --- Comment #12 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-05 10:22:17 EDT --- so, after investigation, plugins in vendor/plugins directory should be packaged separately as standalone applications/library. And actionwebservice ruby library package should be re-created as now it is dead package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051424.n55EO69l026470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-05 10:24:04 EDT --- After discussion with ixs, I'll take co-maintainership on the package for all the active branches. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple Owners: ixs xavierb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:23:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:23:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051423.n55EN9A2026215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-05 10:23:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > i'm not sure what you mean. are you saying my line breaks shouldn't be there? No, you should use the lines up to 80 characters, yours are shorter currently. > i think the usefulness of timestamps > is subverted almost entirely by making it appear as if files are older than > they actually are. but i'll adapt, i guess. :-) timstamps are important for rpm to see if a file has actually changed. This is especially important on multiarch systems (so not on the XO), where you can install two versions of a package in parallel. If two files have same size and date, they will be treated as one file, if they differ, rpm will say they conflict. > i'll research this. i confess it's a little confusing as the maintainer to be > doing a release based on a sandbox, rather than on a tarball. can you perhaps > point me at a (simple) git-based package that does this correctly? a template > would help me here. Version is 6 Release is 2 (pls increase even during review) To mark the git checkout: 20090506git All together it becomes: olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090506git > there's no configuration: after installation and a reboot, the following > things should work: > - with any grab key pressed, both the touchpad and the arrow keys should > cause scrolling. on a USB keyboard, the "windows" keys will act as grab > keys. > - the rotate and brightness keys should "just work". these keys cause the > olpc-rotate and olpc-brightness scripts in /usr/bin to be invoked. I don't have /usr/bin/olpc-brightness. What package is it from? > that's it. you should feel free to test on the current package (URL above), > since none of the current review comments have affected its operation. i'll do > a new package when i've resolved the "description" and tagging issues still > open above. okay? Fine with me, will test tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051433.n55EXMKo015394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #67 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-05 10:33:13 EDT --- Well, I've got a few concerns here: * The License for Songbird appears to be GPLv2, which says: " 5. You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. " The EULA would seem to add this additional requirement that you accept the GPL terms. "POTI IS WILLING TO LICENSE THE SONGBIRD MEDIA PLAYER AND SONGBIRD ADD-ONS TO YOU ONLY UPON THE CONDITION THAT YOU ACCEPT ALL THE TERMS CONTAINED IN THIS AGREEMENT." * The EULA covers "Songbird Add-Ons" without specifying what those are. In addition, you mention that there are Free/Open Source add-ons coming, but this EULA clearly states that all add-ons may not be copied or modified, and imposing commercial use restrictions. All of these EULA overlay restrictions render otherwise Free/Open Source addons non-free. * The EULA requires that the end-user agree to the Fluendo EULA terms, which are most certainly non-free. These three items are showstoppers. While this isn't as bad as what Mozilla originally tried to do with Firefox, the problem is the same. I would suggest that we take a big step back from things and look at specifically what problems that you (Songbird's copyright holder(s)) seem to be trying to solve with this EULA. 1. The source code for the base songbird product is under the GPLv2. No agreement is necessary for anyone to use, copy, modify, distribute, or sell the songbird code. 2. The base songbird product does not come with any addons. Thus, there should not be a need to specify terms for these addons. If a user installs an addon through songbird directly, they should be prompted to agree to downloaded terms before downloading the addon, not at the initial use of songbird. (If addons are manually installed by the user outside of songbird, it is the responsibility of the addon provider to ensure that the terms of that specific addon are either presented to the user before download or before installation). 3. "Proprietary Rights": The GPL is effective in providing this coverage, nothing in the GPL takes away the rights that are preserved by copyright law. There is no need for the user to agree to this explicitly. 4. "Disclaimer of Warranty": The GPL is effective in providing this coverage, it has a thorough disclaimer of warranty. There is no need for the user to agree to this explicitly. 5. "Third-Party Add-Ons": This covers the fact that third-party addons available at the songbird website may have different terms and disclaims warranty. If deemed absolutely necessary, this is something that could be presented in a non-obtrusive way, similar to how firefox handles its third party services, where the user is made aware of these facts, but is not required to agree to them. Realistically, this should be on the songbird website, not embedded in the client. 6. "Term and Termination": This legal boilerplate in the EULA arguably conflicts with the GPL, thus, according to the beginning of the EULA ("To the extent that any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement conflict with the GPLv2 and POTI's exception, the conflicting terms and conditions of this Agreement shall not apply to the Songbird Media Player."), they don't apply anyway, and serve no purpose. 7. "Representations and Warranties." This states that songbird users must comply with the law when using addons (but not the base songbird player?), and that they cannot use the code to infringe other's copyrights. This technically constitutes a use restriction, and conflicts with the GPLv2. In addition, you do not need to force people to agree to follow applicable laws, they're required to do that anyways, no prior agreement necessary. Thus, this entire section is not required. 8. "No Obligation": Already covered adequately in GPLv2, not necessary. 9. "Government Users." These appear to impose additional rights restrictions upon US goverment use, which may conflict with the GPLv2 and thus be irrelevant. If there are additional US government policies covering the use of specific types of software (I'm assuming this is primarily for cryptographic related matters), you could certainly inform the goverment user in an unobtrusive way that these policies may apply, but this is not something that mandates acceptance. (Alternately, the Mozilla Public License 1.1 (Section 10) has this as part of its license, thus, it may be a better fit for Songbird: http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.html ) 10. "Export Laws." Requiring people to follow US export laws in order to use GPLv2 licensed software might be a restriction on the GPL as worded in the EULA. However, the GPLv2 provides a mechanism to handle this: " 8. If the distribution and/or use of the Program is restricted in certain countries either by patents or by copyrighted interfaces, the original copyright holder who places the Program under this License may add an explicit geographical distribution limitation excluding those countries, so that distribution is permitted only in or among countries not thus excluded. In such case, this License incorporates the limitation as if written in the body of this License." I would suggest that along with your gstreamer exception, you can accomplish this by adding a export limitation excluding any countries where songbird could not be distributed in accordance with US export laws. Fedora has similar US export requirements, but we only impose them on our distributors (e.g. mirrors), not via EULA to our users. 11. "Indemnity" and "Limitations of Liability": Covered adequately by the GPLv2, no need for additional user agreement. 12. "General Provisions": More legal boilerplate. GPLv2 conflicts with forced jurisdictional clauses, such as "This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California", so it doesn't apply. (It is worth noting that the Mozilla Public License v1.1 contains virtually identical boilerplate, so, if you cannot move forward without it, switching to that license may be a better fit for you.) 13. "Third-party software": It is good to have this listed, but the user does not need to agree to it, nor be required to review it in order to leverage the rights granted by copyright and the GPLv2 (use, copy, distribute, modify). To put it bluntly, the EULA is entirely unnecessary, and in my opinion, the impact of requiring the user to agree to the EULA's additional terms and restrictions in order to use the songbird base client (and removing all rights granted by the GPLv2 if it is not agreed to) renders this non-free. Please realize that I'm not trying to be a roadblock here because I enjoy it, or because I have anything personally against Songbird. It looks rather cool, so I would encourage you to make the attempt to move away from the failed Windows EULA legal model and have faith in the GPL (which, unlike boilerplate EULAs, has never failed to be upheld in international courts). If you have further questions or improvement suggestions, I would be happy to discuss them, either publicly or privately. Blocking FE-Legal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051444.n55Eihd1000536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #7 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-05 10:44:42 EDT --- Look closely at how you're passing optflags, and how I suggested you do it. Do a build and see if you can see the optflags being used. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051449.n55EnsMB020714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 10:49:53 EDT --- That's not the URL you have in your spec, but it really should be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 14:50:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 10:50:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051450.n55EoTIN021192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-05 10:50:28 EDT --- yay, glad to see someone work on this... will help out review-wise, when I can (will be busy over the next week though...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 15:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051511.n55FBnpe008393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 --- Comment #3 from Adam Jackson 2009-06-05 11:11:48 EDT --- Oops, good catch on COPYING. New spec and srpm in the same place as before. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 15:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051517.n55FH2P5009866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 11:17:00 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-9.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stxxl-1.2.1-9.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 15:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051519.n55FJ6Tr010308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 11:19:06 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 15:18:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:18:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051518.n55FI8S4010073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 11:18:07 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 15:49:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:49:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051549.n55FnD4d019169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #9 from Sean Middleditch 2009-06-05 11:49:11 EDT --- * renamed. note that upstream has a gnome-mud.spec in the tarball itself, which is not Fedora compatible (since every distro seems hell bent on creating artificial incompatibilities through the distro-specific packaging of otherwise identical binaries). * fixed license tag. * fixed gtk build-requires. removed all versions on build-requires after checking up the f10 versions via koji. * wrapped description * the make install bit I had was copied right out of the wiki for fedora packaging. updated to what you provided; might suggest updating the wiki to actually state best practice. copying from existing core Fedora packages clearly isn't a good way to get an idea on best practice either. * moved desktop-file-validate. fixed schemas path name (whoops). removed all references to scrollkeeper, since it seems that the docs in 0.11.2 are broken and not installed (worked in svn when I was packaging that). * changed the %files section reference to the datadir to just %{_datadir}/%{name} per the wiki's suggestion for ensuring ownership of directory and all files underneath. * removed INSTALL from docs Did a scratch build on Koji and made sure it builds on all archs. Installed and testing on my desktop to make sure it actually runs and works. http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud.spec http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud-0.11.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 15:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 11:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051552.n55FqsQL008857@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Overholt 2009-06-05 11:52:52 EDT --- Sorry for the delay. There are some rpmlint warnings: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/saxpath-javadoc-1.0-1.3.fc11.noarch.rpm saxpath-javadoc.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development/Documentation saxpath-javadoc.noarch: W: invalid-license Saxpath saxpath-javadoc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/javadoc/saxpath/default.css saxpath-javadoc.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/javadoc/saxpath/javadoc/javadoc.css 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/saxpath-1.0-1.3.fc11.noarch.rpm saxpath.noarch: W: non-standard-group Development saxpath.noarch: W: invalid-license Saxpath saxpath.noarch: W: no-documentation saxpath.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/maven/fragments/saxpath 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/saxpath-1.0-1.3.fc11.src.rpm saxpath.src: W: non-standard-group Development saxpath.src: W: invalid-license Saxpath saxpath.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 6) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Please fix these. The non-conffile-in-etc warning can be waived. So can the groupm no-documentation, and invalid-license warnings. So we're left with the encodings (see the guidelines for how to fix) and the mixed use of spaces and tabs in the specfile. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 16:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051624.n55GOHt2017513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-05 12:24:15 EDT --- Thanks for the fixes! ---------------------------------------------------- This package (globus-rls-server) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------------- So this was the last one. Are there going to be more? You can add me to the CC if you submit more globus review requests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 16:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051645.n55GjeHx002438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #15 from Paul Fox 2009-06-05 12:45:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > i'm not sure what you mean. are you saying my line breaks shouldn't be there? > > No, you should use the lines up to 80 characters, yours are shorter currently. > oh! sure, i can fix that. :-) > > i think the usefulness of timestamps > > is subverted almost entirely by making it appear as if files are older than > > they actually are. but i'll adapt, i guess. :-) > > timstamps are important for rpm to see if a file has actually changed. This is > especially important on multiarch systems (so not on the XO), where you can > install two versions of a package in parallel. If two files have same size and > date, they will be treated as one file, if they differ, rpm will say they > conflict. okay -- i thought it was just for users. > > > i'll research this. i confess it's a little confusing as the maintainer to be > > doing a release based on a sandbox, rather than on a tarball. can you perhaps > > point me at a (simple) git-based package that does this correctly? a template > > would help me here. > > Version is 6 > Release is 2 (pls increase even during review) > To mark the git checkout: 20090506git > All together it becomes: olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090506git okay. from now, the package includes the date and git hash (abbreviated). > > > there's no configuration: after installation and a reboot, the following > > things should work: > > - with any grab key pressed, both the touchpad and the arrow keys should > > cause scrolling. on a USB keyboard, the "windows" keys will act as grab > > keys. > > - the rotate and brightness keys should "just work". these keys cause the > > olpc-rotate and olpc-brightness scripts in /usr/bin to be invoked. > > I don't have /usr/bin/olpc-brightness. What package is it from? yikes! good catch. there used to be good reason for olpc-brightness to be packaged with olpc-powerd (unreviewed), but that's no longer the case. since i usually install both packages for testing, i hadn't noticed that olpc-brightness wasn't being installed by olpc-kbdshim. i've fixed this, and now olpc-kbdshim installs both the olpc-rotate and olpc-brightness scripts. please review: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim.spec-6-2.20090605git98f5b2c http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090605git98f5b2c.src.rpm and test: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090605git98f5b2c.fc9.i386.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 16:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 12:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051650.n55Go30I023243@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Mattias Ellert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Mattias Ellert 2009-06-05 12:50:01 EDT --- Thank you for all the reviews. There were a few bumps along the way, but we got there in the end. I think writing the Globus specific packaging guidelines helped pave the way. There are more Globus packages, but just right now I have not immediate plans for more - though I am open for requests from Globus users - the Globus gridftp server might be on the horizon eventually. My next set of packages will be some other pieces of Grid computing software which is not part of the Globus toolkit, but that are built against its libraries. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: globus-rls-server Short Description: Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server Owners: ellert Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:00:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:00:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492744] Review Request: python-grizzled - The Grizzled Utility Library is a general-purpose Python library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051700.n55H0wmA026233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-05 13:00:57 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051707.n55H7jcM008098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-05 13:07:43 EDT --- Just one small thing needs to be changed. The %define needs to be changed to %global (see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define for details) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051718.n55HIrUq031017@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #8 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-05 13:18:52 EDT --- CFLAGS="%{optflags}" + make -j3 'CFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' vs. CXXFLAGS="%{optflags}" + make -j3 'CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i586 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables' So whats the difference? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051725.n55HPdgi000590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:32:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:32:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051732.n55HW9Gg002048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #32 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-05 13:32:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346692) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346692) new spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051732.n55HWsL4002222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #33 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-05 13:32:54 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346693) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346693) new src rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:37:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:37:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051737.n55HbmVS017061@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051737.n55HbIWp016983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #34 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-05 13:37:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > Maricio, your source tarball includes a folder called 'build' which shouldn't > be there. Have you packed it yourself? I checked the tarball from the website > and it's not included there. Please replace the tarball with the correct one. > sorry, it was from a previous work when I use the debugger addins compiling and installing before the package creation, removed..hope that the configure.log and may be other files are ok to be there.. > Please make the release numbers increasing (latest should be 3). ok increased to 3, don't know if you mean in a "auto" way.. > Furthermore we > can simplify the ./configure... line through the use of the %configure macro. > can't, using %configure macro I get: + ./configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --target=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --program-prefix= --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin --sysconfdir=/etc --datadir=/usr/share --includedir=/usr/include --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/libexec --localstatedir=/var --sharedstatedir=/var/lib --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info Unknown argument --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu Usage : configure [OPTION]... [--config=CONFIG] > btw, we are on a good way :) hopefully, btw I forget to add another log entry about the incresing realease number and the build folder removed, hope that don't matter.. Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051742.n55HgPaa004658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #4 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-05 13:42:24 EDT --- Following is the answer from upstream (C. Jackson): "Thanks for pointing that out, it was an oversight. I will alter the DESCRIPTION file to put the whole package under GPL version 2 or later. I'm working on several updates and bug fixes at the moment, so I intend to release the next version with this change within the next two weeks." So, I shall update the specification file accordingly (hopefully this week-end), and re-deliver the new upstream version when available. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051743.n55HhTIG004813@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-05 13:43:27 EDT --- Well, for -2: * Source tarball - The tarball in the srpm differs from what I could download from the URL written as %SOURCE: ----------------------------------------------------------- 599008 2009-02-28 01:34 gnome-mud-0.11.2.tar.gz 564186 2009-06-05 23:22 gnome-mud-0.11.2-2.fc11.src/gnome-mud-0.11.2.tar.gz ----------------------------------------------------------- * Some rpmlint issue ----------------------------------------------------------- gnome-mud.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/gnome-mud-0.11.2/AUTHORS ----------------------------------------------------------- - Please convert this file to UTF-8. Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on my wiki page: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Mtasaka#B._Review_request_tickets (Check "No one is reviewing") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:49:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:49:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502920] Review Request: polkit-gnome - PolicyKit integration for the GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051749.n55HnkTY005753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502920 --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-05 13:49:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > I don't see any problem with parallel build. Have you verified that there are > no race conditions in the package if you turn it on ? See, me neither... Well, that's one of the things a reviewer should check. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 17:56:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 13:56:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051756.n55Hu6eh007147@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-05 13:56:05 EDT --- - Capitalize tags: OK - rpmlint: spurious-executable-perm fixed. OK - Upstream sources: OK - .desktop file: the admin interface is busted.. no need to ship the .desktop file for now -> OK I installed the package on F11 i586 with no problems. Ship it :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051803.n55I3UQD022273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 14:03:29 EDT --- Looks good, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051805.n55I5RqR023188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #35 from Paul Lange 2009-06-05 14:05:26 EDT --- The source tarball has to be exactly the same as the upstream release. You can check that with md5sum: [paul at papaya SOURCES]$ md5sum monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 55f225ffb47a67289d342bf389e133c8 monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 [paul at papaya SOURCES]$ md5sum ../../Downloads/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 b60e9a0783f294aaa137c78e32c4f6be ../../Downloads/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 Please use the upstream tarball. I know it's nutpicking - but lets make it right: What I meant with change the changelog is this diff: 67c67 < * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-1 --- > * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-3 70c70 < * Sun May 03 2009 Ryan Bair - 2.0-1 --- > * Sun May 03 2009 Ryan Bair - 2.0-2 73c73 < * Thu Apr 30 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0 --- > * Thu Apr 30 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-1 The last entry should always be equal to the version and release number. Hope that makes sense to you. OK, only the tarball left for the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051821.n55ILqMn027556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-05 14:21:50 EDT --- $ rpmlint mingw32-boost.spec mingw32-boost.spec:95: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build #BUILD_FLAGS="--with-toolset=gcc --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix}" mingw32-boost.spec:108: W: configure-without-libdir-spec mingw32-boost.spec: W: patch-not-applied Patch7: boost-1_37_0-smp.patch 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. The rpm-buildroot-usage is a false positive as that line is commented out The configure-without-libdir-spec is also a false positive as boost uses a different build system The patch-not-applied is also a false positive as the patch is applied by a custom command $ rpmlint mingw32-boost-*.rpm mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_system.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_tr1l.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_system-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_c99.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_date_time.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_tr1.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_test_exec_monitor-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_c99f.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_wave-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_regex-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_regex.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_c99-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_date_time-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_signals-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_wserialization.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_iostreams.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_thread-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_filesystem-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_serialization-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_program_options.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_wave.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_tr1-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_iostreams-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_serialization.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_test_exec_monitor.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_program_options-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_graph-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_wserialization-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_tr1f-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_c99l-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_signals.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_tr1l-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_unit_test_framework-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_tr1f.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_c99f-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_prg_exec_monitor-mt.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_math_c99l.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_graph.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libboost_filesystem.a mingw32-boost-static.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 41 errors, 1 warnings. These warnings are all false positives $ md5sum boost_1_37_0.tar.bz2 8d9f990bfb7e83769fa5f1d6f065bc92 boost_1_37_0.tar.bz2 $ curl http://ovh.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/boost/boost_1_37_0.tar.bz2 --silent | md5sum 8d9f990bfb7e83769fa5f1d6f065bc92 - + OK ! Needs to be looked into / Not applicable * Overridden by MinGW guidelines [+] Files are installed in /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw [+] BuildRequires: mingw32-filesystem >= xx is in the .spec file [+] Requires are OK [+] BuildArch: noarch [+] No man pages or info files [+] default strip and objdump commands are overridden with mingw32 specific ones [+] rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption on Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines; inclusion of those as B ildRequires is optional. [/] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [*] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [/] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines . [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [/] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. [/] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [*] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [/] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [*] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [*] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [*] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [/] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). See Prepping BuildRoot For %install for details. [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [/] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [/] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. See MockTricks for details on how to do this. [+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [/] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [/] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [/] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. [/] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. All okay, so: =================================================== The package mingw32-boost is APPROVED by epienbro =================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051823.n55INKsn014735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-05 14:23:18 EDT --- Ping Levente -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479874] Review Request: mingw32-postgresql - postgresql development library's libpq In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051825.n55IPmdW015578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479874 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw at lists.fedorapr | |oject.org --- Comment #13 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-05 14:25:46 EDT --- Ping: Itamar Reis Peixoto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051831.n55IVc3d030124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 14:31:37 EDT --- Indeed, thhis builds fine and rpmlint complains only about the two .guide files that aren't utf8. The source files indicate their license only inconsistently. Where they do, they mention only "GNU PL" or "GNU license" and often only "free software". Since this was in Fedora previously and merely orphaned (not dropped due to licens, I'm going to make the assume that this was previously cleared to be the GNU GPL, with no version specified giving GPL+. I tested thhis manually and it seems to work fine. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: a8ddd38ac43d9b6f156334a471a66fa93bb83695ef3a99ce62eb8ea3f44e5c08 AGReader.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none needed). * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: AGReader = 1.2-5.fc11 AGReader(x86-64) = 1.2-5.fc11 = (nothing special) * no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:32:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:32:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051832.n55IWmiq017214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2009-06-05 14:32:47 EDT --- Thanks. I've added a run of the test suite to the %build phase (rather than to the %install as the tests aren't part of the final installed payload; at least, not according to how upstream has written the setup.py) Updated specfile here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-sqlparse.spec Updated SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-sqlparse-0.1.1-2.src.rpm Successful scratch build in Koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1395571 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:53:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:53:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051853.n55Ir6Q4022705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 14:53:05 EDT --- Is there some reason the test suite won't run from a %check section? It's rather odd to run it from %build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:54:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:54:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051854.n55IsQoj022871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 14:54:25 EDT --- Oh, I see the confusion. By "at build time" I meant "when the package is built", not literally "in the %build section". rpm gives us a nice %check section for the purpose of running tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499875] Review Request: libdasm - Library for disassembling x86 code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051856.n55IumjR023525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499875 --- Comment #2 from Dave Malcolm 2009-06-05 14:56:47 EDT --- Was missing a buildrequires on python-devel; added. Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/libdasm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/libdasm-1.5-2.src.rpm Successful scratch build in koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1395600 However, am not sure this is ready yet; rpmlint is showing some soname warnings: libdasm.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libdasm.so.1.0 libdasm-devel.i386: W: no-documentation libdasm-devel.i386: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libdasm.so pydasm.i386: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 18:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 14:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051857.n55IvOgh023625@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #36 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-05 14:57:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > The source tarball has to be exactly the same as the upstream release. You can > check that with md5sum: > [paul at papaya SOURCES]$ md5sum monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > 55f225ffb47a67289d342bf389e133c8 monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > [paul at papaya SOURCES]$ md5sum > ../../Downloads/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > b60e9a0783f294aaa137c78e32c4f6be > ../../Downloads/monodevelop-debugger-mdb-2.0.tar.bz2 > > Please use the upstream tarball. using the upstream packages I get: .0.0.0 mono(mscorlib) = 2.0.0.0 Processing files: monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel-2.0-3.fc10 rpmbuild: rpmfc.c:407: rpmfcHelper: Assertion `EVR != ((void *)0)' failed. Aborted That is a bug in rpmbuild tools that crash with certain missing info in the sources, now I don't remeber what exactly wha tit was, but if I remember correctly was the missing Version info at: mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in > > I know it's nutpicking - but lets make it right: What I meant with change the > changelog is this diff: > 67c67 > < * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-1 > --- > > * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-3 > 70c70 > < * Sun May 03 2009 Ryan Bair - 2.0-1 > --- > > * Sun May 03 2009 Ryan Bair - 2.0-2 > 73c73 > < * Thu Apr 30 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0 > --- > > * Thu Apr 30 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-1 > > > The last entry should always be equal to the version and release number. Hope > that makes sense to you. nop, sorry not at all :-S Something like this for the last one then?: * Thu Jun 05 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-3 - Source tarball changed to the upstream one ..also why we are using "3" as the release number? > > OK, only the tarball left for the review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051901.n55J1nc5004393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-05 15:01:48 EDT --- Look at the gcc invocations. ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:06:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:06:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051906.n55J6OAb025860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-05 15:06:23 EDT --- For 0.21-3: * BR - As written in another review request, please don't use "BR: perl" directly * Directory ownership issue - Please fix this as the same as your another review request ( this rpm should not own %perl_vendorlib/POE or so ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:07:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:07:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051907.n55J7ch5005285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Aillon 2009-06-05 15:07:37 EDT --- On F11, I see error: Failed build dependencies: vala-devel >= 0.7 is needed by rygel-0.3-1.fc11.src gupnp-vala >= 0.5.4 is needed by rygel-0.3-1.fc11.src I see there's a new version of vala in updates-testing, so grabbing that. Do you have a newer version of gupnp-vala available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051911.n55JBqWj026859@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 --- Comment #5 from Dave Malcolm 2009-06-05 15:11:51 EDT --- Aha! (Clearly I need more coffee/sleep). Thanks. Updated specfile here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-sqlparse.spec Updated SRPM here: http://people.redhat.com/dmalcolm/python/python-sqlparse-0.1.1-3.src.rpm Successful scratch build in Koji here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1395636 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051908.n55J8IAH026159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Adam Jackson 2009-06-05 15:08:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libdlo Short Description: DisplayLink driver library Owners: ajax Branches: InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051929.n55JTYO2009169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #18 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-05 15:29:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > On F11, I see > > error: Failed build dependencies: > vala-devel >= 0.7 is needed by rygel-0.3-1.fc11.src > gupnp-vala >= 0.5.4 is needed by rygel-0.3-1.fc11.src > > I see there's a new version of vala in updates-testing, so grabbing that. Do > you have a newer version of gupnp-vala available? Not yet as I'm waiting for it all to push out, haven't had a chance to get the new vala builds tagged into build override. The f12 built one will function just fine on F11 though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051935.n55JZOZM031598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 15:35:23 EDT --- If you want to release before those upstream cleanups are done, just include the correspondence clarifying the license as a %doc file in the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051944.n55JigwW001153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-05 15:44:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libiodbc Short Description: iODBC Driver Manager Owners: rdieter Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 19:49:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 15:49:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467154] Review Request: libvirt-qpid - An interface with libvirt using QMF (qpid modeling framework) which utilizes the Advanced Message Queuing protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906051949.n55JnJZi013713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467154 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 15:49:17 EDT --- The package seems to be in the distribution, so I don't see why this ticket hasn't been closed. Since nobody involved with this bug has done so, I'll set the flag and close it out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 20:00:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:00:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052000.n55K0Ngp005962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla 2009-06-05 16:00:22 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: AGReader Short Description: Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files Owners: limb Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: Was previously orphan, exists up through F-9, I believe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 20:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052029.n55KTB7j022950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-05 16:29:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > okay. from now, the package includes the date and git hash (abbreviated). excellent > > I don't have /usr/bin/olpc-brightness. What package is it from? > > yikes! good catch. The whole time I had the feeling that something was missing. ;) I'm very keen on the brightness script because I need it for LXDE and Xfce as well. But to be honest I'm a little disappointed, the script could be more sophisticated IMHO, e. g. it could read max brightness from /sys/class/backlight/dcon-bl/max_brightness. Take a look at http://www.catmoran.com/olpc/#xfcebrvo olpc-brightness is being run as root because of the permissions of /sys/class/backlight/dcon-bl/brightness, right? Is there no better way? Can we use hal to give user write permission? Anyway, testing was positive, everything works as you described. So let's check the outstanding issues: OK - MINOR: BuildRoot tag OK - MAJOR: BuildArch tag OK - MAJOR: Requires: hal added OK - MINOR: Description: line breaks are at 80 characters OK - MAJOR: RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honored OK - MAJOR: Timestamps preserved I just realized that "BuildArch: %{ix86}" is not a good idea because the buildsys will then build for i386, i486, i586, i686 and athlon. Better use ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} One last thing: during build I see: + make fatal: Not a git repository fatal: Not a git repository fatal: Not a git repository fatal: Not a git repository fatal: Not a git repository I wouldn't call this a blocker, but please fix it. olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090605git98f5b2c.src.rpm is APPROVED P.S.: Please cc me if you submit olpc-powerd for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 20:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052035.n55KZuX0013301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #19 from Christopher Aillon 2009-06-05 16:35:55 EDT --- Okay, grabbing it, but I just tagged the newer vala into override if you want to get the gupnp builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 20:32:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:32:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052032.n55KWq9q012457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-05 16:32:50 EDT --- Guido, it's time for the CVS Admin Procedure, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 20:57:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:57:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052057.n55KvO6j029035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 16:57:22 EDT --- Please set the fedora-review flag to '?' if you're reviewing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:06:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:06:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052106.n55L6Fxo031018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Christopher Aillon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Christopher Aillon 2009-06-05 17:06:14 EDT --- rpmlint output as required by package review guidelines: rygel.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/gconf/schemas/rygel.schemas rygel-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation MUST fix: N/A. Package meets all requirements in the MUST section of the Package Review guidelines as of Fri, Jun 5, 2009. SHOULD fix: Please use the most preferred buildroot tag per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Additional Suggestion: Please change your comment about the .la files. .la files are not static libraries, they are libtool archives. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052119.n55LJBUr020886@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lmacken at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Luke Macken 2009-06-05 17:19:09 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-2.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-pylons.spec * Fri Jun 05 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0-2 - Add a patch to ensure we use our own setuptools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479021] Review Request: python-repoze-what-plugins-sql - The repoze.what SQL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052121.n55LLH3D001126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479021 --- Comment #3 from Luke Macken 2009-06-05 17:21:16 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql-1.0-0.3.rc1.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-repoze-what-plugins-sql.spec * Fri Jun 05 2009 Luke Macken - 1.0-0.3.rc1 - Patch our setup.py to use our own setuptools package -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:28:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:28:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052128.n55LSkQ2002228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:28:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052129.n55LTdG6002567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:29:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:30:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:30:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504225] Review Request: libdlo - DisplayLink driver library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052130.n55LU00Q002842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504225 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:29:59 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:32:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:32:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052132.n55LWE28003517@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-05 17:32:12 EDT --- Thanks Christopher, will fix up should and suggestions on commit. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rygel Short Description: A UPnP v2 Media Server Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052133.n55LXuRk023904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:33:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:36:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:36:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501116] Review Request: perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple - Perl Module for Generating HTML Calendars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052136.n55LalmD024506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501116 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:36:45 EDT --- Andreas indicated to me in IRC that he should be the owner of the EL-5 branch and that you should be the comaintainer, so that's what I've set up. If you want to be co-maintainer for the rest of the branches, just go to the pkgdb page and add yourself. You don't need to make a CVS request for ownership changes like this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:38:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:38:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504177] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052138.n55LcnwF004713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504177 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:38:48 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052139.n55LdSc7004813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:39:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503967] Review Request: mobile-broadband-provider-info - database of mobile broadband providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052137.n55LbUr3004512@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503967 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:37:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:40:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:40:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052140.n55LepKI025593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:40:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052141.n55LfVeO025677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:41:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052138.n55LcAuH024743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:38:09 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052142.n55Lgi0C005650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:42:43 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052142.n55Lg7GF005582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:42:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:39:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:39:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052139.n55LdvX0004979@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Jerry James 2009-06-05 17:39:55 EDT --- Alexander, thank you very much for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: findbugs-contrib Short Description: Extra findbugs detectors Owners: jjames Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052143.n55LhQWT025995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 17:43:25 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 21:55:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 17:55:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052155.n55LtQxD028234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #9 from Michael Ploujnikov 2009-06-05 17:55:25 EDT --- Fixed in: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libtiff.spec http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-15.fc10.src.rpm $ rpmlint /home/plouj/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-15.fc10.src.rpm /home/plouj/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-15.fc10.noarch.rpm mingw32-libtiff.src:80: W: macro-in-%changelog define mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiff.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffvers.h mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.la mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.la mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.hxx mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object /usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 11 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 22:07:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:07:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052207.n55M7jdR030309@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 18:07:43 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 22:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052208.n55M8CP6030412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-05 18:08:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 22:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052227.n55MR3FN001085@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 --- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-05 18:27:02 EDT --- Imported into cvs. F-12 build as follows: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1395963 filed rel-eng ticket 1914 for gupnp-vala dep for F-11 build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 5 22:41:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:41:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906052241.n55MfloT003602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 --- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-05 18:41:46 EDT --- * Sat Jun 6 2009 Yanko Kaneti - 0.21-4 - Implement review feedback from Mamoru Tasaka https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885#c4 - Do not own %%{perl_vendorlib}/POE + Component + Client - Drop explicit perl , sed BR - Use perl instead of %%{__perl} SPEC: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP.spec SRPM: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP/perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP-0.21-4.fc11.src.rpm Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 01:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060140.n561eqJg015553@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #11 from Guido Grazioli 2009-06-05 21:40:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Guido, it's time for the CVS Admin Procedure, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure i'm ready to do that, but as suggested in the wiki, i mailed -devel to tell i'm asking to re-include a retired package; still waiting for someone, maybe the former owner, to answer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060324.n563OJCx006171@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:24:18 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:23:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:23:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060323.n563NaYg006079@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:23:35 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:26:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:26:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060326.n563QS22028421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:26:28 EDT --- toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060322.n563MxAP027744@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:22:58 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:25:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:25:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060325.n563Pc96006596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:25:37 EDT --- toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060329.n563TSFp007240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:29:27 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060328.n563S23V006977@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:28:01 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 03:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 23:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060328.n563SiPV007107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-05 23:28:44 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 04:11:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:11:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060411.n564BDlN004998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 00:11:13 EDT --- toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 04:31:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:31:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060431.n564V7m2008681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 00:31:06 EDT --- globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 04:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060431.n564V3YT008648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 00:31:02 EDT --- globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 04:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 00:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060430.n564UwZw019521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 00:30:57 EDT --- globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 05:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060518.n565Icxv026676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 01:18:38 EDT --- findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 05:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060518.n565Ihvr026704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 01:18:43 EDT --- findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 05:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060539.n565dqCl019342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #4 from D Haley 2009-06-06 01:39:50 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-4.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/nurbs++-3.0.11-4.fc10.src.rpm Thanks for letting me know about the build fail. I updated it to build under dist-f11 (gcc 4.4): Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1396600 Changelog: * Sat Jun 06 2009 3.0.11-4 - Patch to fix build for gcc-4.4 - Add buildrequires to fix autoreconf/libtool command missing in f11 koji * Sat Jan 24 2009 3.0.11-3 - Modified patch to enable opengl build -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 05:55:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 01:55:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 441570] Review Request: dnx - Distributed Nagios Executor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060555.n565tMgv022064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441570 --- Comment #29 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-06 01:55:16 EDT --- Jeff, are you still there? ;) I guess I will close this review out soon if I don't hear from you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 06:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 02:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060655.n566tFYw031773@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 02:55:14 EDT --- Okay. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 07:35:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 03:35:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060735.n567ZTKb016363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-06 03:35:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP Short Description: Asynchronous mail sending with POE Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 07:52:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 03:52:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060752.n567qsDA009522@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 03:52:52 EDT --- Jussi, if you are going to review this ticket formally and to sponsor Gareth, would you assign this bug to yourself? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 07:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 03:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060756.n567uscd010453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 03:56:53 EDT --- Well, at least BR: libgnomeui-devel is missing: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/paperbox/MOCK-paperbox.log ! By the way, as seen above you can still try mockbuild even if BR contains not-yet-approved packages by setting local yum repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 08:14:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 04:14:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060814.n568ElTW024413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 04:14:46 EDT --- erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 08:14:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 04:14:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060814.n568ErQ4024461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-06 04:14:53 EDT --- erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 08:22:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 04:22:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060822.n568MJTN015965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 08:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 04:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060822.n568M4kD025970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #31 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 04:22:03 EDT --- Well, why not. Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 09:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 05:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906060901.n5691KGM002034@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 10:47:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 06:47:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061047.n56AlvNa013930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #10 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-06 06:47:56 EDT --- Ah yes :) There it is. Spec URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet.spec SRPM URL: http://cheekyboinc.fedorapeople.org/bastet-0.43-5.fc11.src.rpm - Changed CFLAGS to CXXFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 10:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 06:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] New: Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 Summary: Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mfleming+rpm at thatfleminggent.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mfleming.fedorapeople.org/perl-Cache-Memcached.spec SRPM URL: http://mfleming.fedorapeople.org/perl-Cache-Memcached-1.26-2.fc10.mf.src.rpm Description: A Perl client library for memcached (memory cache daemon) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 10:57:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 06:57:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061057.n56AvBOH025618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #16 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-06 06:57:09 EDT --- Sorry i can't do this review anymore. 1) Blocks: FE-Legal 2) put_a_personal_reason_in -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 11:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] New: Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Summary: Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw-2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: JaxoDraw is a Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams. It has a complete graphical user interface that allows to carry out all actions in a mouse click-and-drag fashion. Fine-tuning of the diagrams is also possible through keyboard entries. Graphs may be exported to (encapsulated) postscript and can be saved in XML files to be used in later sessions. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 11:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 07:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061105.n56B5cJT017279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 07:05:37 EDT --- The package also contains a component with a non-GNU license. Is this OK in Fedora? (src/doc/legal/FORM-LICENSE) Conditions of use of FORM The use of the FORM program and programs in the distribution is free of charge but subject to the following conditions: 1: The programs are `as is'. That is, the author is not to be held responsible in any way for any errors or malfunctioning of the programs. 2: The programs are not to be redistributed in any version that is modified from the original distribution unless with the specific consent of the author. In particular this license file is to be part of any redistribution. 3: The programs are not to be redistributed in exchange for money or made part of any commercial deal without the explicit written consent of the author. 4: When the FORM program is used for scientific work that leads to publication in a scientific journal, this work should refer to the use of FORM by the following citation: J.A.M.Vermaseren "New features of FORM" math-ph/0010025 or something similar that is acceptable for the journal of publication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 13:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061334.n56DY270012819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #17 from Paul Fox 2009-06-06 09:33:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I'm a little disappointed, the script could be more sophisticated IMHO, > e. g. it could read max brightness from > /sys/class/backlight/dcon-bl/max_brightness. Take a look at > http://www.catmoran.com/olpc/#xfcebrvo i would have thought that a script that doesn't require bash, invokes no external processes (catmoran's invokes two) would be more sophisticated, not less. :-) i understand your point about max_brightness, but the values i hard-coded in the hardware, and i see little reason to ask the kernel for the value, in that case. > > olpc-brightness is being run as root because of the permissions of > /sys/class/backlight/dcon-bl/brightness, right? Is there no better way? Can we > use hal to give user write permission? we could -- in fact, the daemon could simply change the permissions itself. are you concerned that users can't change the brightness themselves? or that the script runs as root? > > Anyway, testing was positive, everything works as you described. So let's check > the outstanding issues: > > OK - MINOR: BuildRoot tag > OK - MAJOR: BuildArch tag > OK - MAJOR: Requires: hal added > OK - MINOR: Description: line breaks are at 80 characters > OK - MAJOR: RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honored > OK - MAJOR: Timestamps preserved > > I just realized that "BuildArch: %{ix86}" is not a good idea because the > buildsys will then build for i386, i486, i586, i686 and athlon. Better use > ExclusiveArch: %{ix86} should this still use the macro in that case? > One last thing: during build I see: > + make > fatal: Not a git repository > fatal: Not a git repository > fatal: Not a git repository > fatal: Not a git repository > fatal: Not a git repository > fixed. thanks again for your help. > I wouldn't call this a blocker, but please fix it. > > > olpc-kbdshim-6-2.20090605git98f5b2c.src.rpm is APPROVED > > P.S.: Please cc me if you submit olpc-powerd for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 13:46:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 09:46:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061346.n56DkuMM015545@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-06 09:46:54 EDT --- Good: - rpmlint checks return nothing. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (1d7d42f93831b903e1fccee106a71c0bd4822c3d) - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - desktop file okay, handled properly APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 14:55:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 10:55:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061455.n56EtvHF007544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Stefan Posdzich 2009-06-06 10:55:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bastet Short Description: An evil falling bricks game Owners: cheekyboinc Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:02:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:02:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061502.n56F2BOw031699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061501.n56F1xvg031632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #10 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-06 11:01:58 EDT --- rpmlint gives a new warning as of the last release: mingw32-libtiff.src:80: W: macro-in-%changelog define To fix this, you need to escape the macro in the changelog. This can be done by changing the changelog entry from: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Michael Ploujnikov - 3.8.2-15 - replace %define with %global as per Fedora packaging guidelines to: * Fri Jun 5 2009 Michael Ploujnikov - 3.8.2-15 - replace %%define with %%global as per Fedora packaging guidelines Please fix this before importing the package in CVS ===================================================== The package mingw32-libtiff is APPROVED by epienbro ===================================================== -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061520.n56FKrLQ013149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cheekyboinc at foresightlinux. |nobody at fedoraproject.org |org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:26:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:26:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489633] Review Request: mingw32-physfs - MinGW Windows port of the PhysicsFS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061526.n56FQipQ004776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489633 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(ploujj at gmail.com) | --- Comment #23 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-06-06 11:26:41 EDT --- This bug doesn't need to be in NEEDINFO any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061531.n56FVcBJ015564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Michael Ploujnikov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Michael Ploujnikov 2009-06-06 11:31:37 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-libtiff Short Description: MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library Owners: plouj Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:39:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:39:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061539.n56Fd2b4016735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #8 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-06-06 11:39:00 EDT --- Rebuilt, solved the ownership of audacious/General directory: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms.spec http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.5.rc8.fc10.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1396981 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 15:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 11:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483025] Review Request: imms - Adaptive playlist framework tracking and adapting to your listening patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061542.n56Fg43E017692@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483025 --- Comment #9 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-06-06 11:42:03 EDT --- wrong link by copy&paste in the previous comment: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/imms/imms-3.1.0-0.6.rc8.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 16:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061617.n56GHLqc015133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #28 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 12:17:18 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 16:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061617.n56GHnUB015221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #33 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 12:17:45 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 16:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061632.n56GWJDo028118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 Louis Lagendijk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |louis at lagendijk.xs4all.nl --- Comment #1 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-06 12:32:17 EDT --- Here is my pre-review of your package. I have not yet been able to test the package as I do not like running my system with selinux disabled. This is not a full fledged review as I am requiring a sponsor, just like you. Legend: +: OK -: not ok, see notes N: Not applicable ?: Not sure, please comment - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. [louis at travel tmp]$ rpmlint *README.txt: elgg.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Elgg elgg.src: W: invalid-license GPL Remove the Elgg from the summary, e.g. This package provides and extensible social networking platform License should be GPLv2 according to the website, GPLv2 or later according to the README.txt, so I assume that GPLv2+ is appropriate. + MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec remove the version from the specfilename See http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name ? MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . Specfile does not define buildroot, is that ok? mod_rewrite is required according to the website, is it missing idem for json Php SOAP, DOM mbstring are recommended. Do these require additional dependencies? Why are wget and ImageMagic needed? They are not listed as dependences on the website. + MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [3] See above+ MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text.... + MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [5] + MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6] + MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. + MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [7] N MUST: If the package does not successfully compile.... + MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10] N MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable.... + MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [13] Don't know why this happens, nut buildlog says: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/elgg/.htaccess I asssume this is caused by the fact that you list both the file itself AND %{elggdir} + MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. + MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [15] + MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [16] + MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [17] N MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. + MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. N MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [19] N MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [20] N MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig.... N MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [22] N MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built.[20] N MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, N MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [25] ? MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [26] I dont know how to check this + SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [27] N SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [28] + SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [29] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1396995 + SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [30] ! SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. + SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [31] N SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [22] N SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase.... N SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [32] Additional notes: 1) The package contains a number of other packages (in /usr/share/elgg/vendors) like jquery, should these not be packaged separately? 2) It may be good to use the %{?dist} Tag 3) Please add more detail in the Fedora README on how to setup elgg 4) Please add a selinux module that allows elgg to be used with SElinux enabled 5) Some doc-files still have CRLF as line terminators: INSTALL.txt, README.txt 6) INSTALL.txt shall be excluded as the RPM does the install. Add the relevant parts to your Fedora README? best regards, Louis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 16:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp- cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061635.n56GZZtD028714@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #12 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-06 12:35:34 EDT --- First pre-review done. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 16:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:34:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061634.n56GYvXk028363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-06 12:34:56 EDT --- FORM is obviously completely non-free. No freedom to distribute modified versions, no commercial distribution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 16:56:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 12:56:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061656.n56Gu1nd023056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #2 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-06 12:56:00 EDT --- I looked a bit more into the use of jquery etc. You are actually including a COMPILED version of jquery (while later versions are available). The source files are NOT included! The same applies to the jquery.easing plugin. kses is included, but the docs end up under /usr/share/elgg/vendors/kses/docs. I guess that all stuff under vendors must be moved out to separate packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 17:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061705.n56H5Mli002388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 13:05:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > FORM is obviously completely non-free. No freedom to distribute modified > versions, no commercial distribution. True. Actually, according to src/doc/legal/LICENSE the non-free stuff governed by FORM-LICENSE is not even in the jaxodraw tarball; the only supposedly non-free item is the latex stylefile axodraw4j.sty which is in the Source1 tarball. More interestingly, the file itself claims to be under the LaTeX Project Public License; the FORM license doesn't seem to have any connection with it other than a common author. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 17:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492094] Review Request: darksnow - GTK Interface for darkice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061719.n56HJJ8l027762@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492094 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 13:19:18 EDT --- again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 17:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:23:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061723.n56HNbkU028858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 13:23:36 EDT --- I have emailed upstream about this issue. For now it would seem that there is no licensing problem at all, since the LateX Project Public License is free. Removing FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 17:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 13:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467324] Review Request: mingw32-portablexdr - MinGW Windows PortableXDR XDR / RPC library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061730.n56HU88W030331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467324 --- Comment #19 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-06 13:30:05 EDT --- Richard, any update on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:00:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:00:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061800.n56I0Oqn012637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-06 14:00:22 EDT --- Shakthi, In order for me to sponsor you, please apply for the "packager" group on https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/packager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:31:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:31:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061831.n56IVf6O009624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #18 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-06 14:31:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > i would have thought that a script that doesn't require bash, invokes no > external processes (catmoran's invokes two) would be more sophisticated, not > less. :-) i understand your point about max_brightness, but the values i > hard-coded in the hardware, and i see little reason to ask the kernel for the > value, in that case. Agreed, all valid points. > we could -- in fact, the daemon could simply change the permissions itself. > are you concerned that users can't change the brightness themselves? or that > the script runs as root? The former. > should this still use the macro in that case? The macro is useful if we decide to change our arch again, but as long as you are following Fedora's development you can also use BuildArch: i386 again, I don't really mind. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061829.n56ITwNV018310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 14:29:57 EDT --- Devel packages (normally) require the main package, so there's no need to BR perl, python, ruby since you're already BR'ing perl-devel, python-devel and ruby-devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:34:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:34:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061834.n56IYB37019211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 14:34:10 EDT --- - Listing locales explicitly is forbidden, you need to use %{find_lang}. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files - Explicitly requiring stfl, sqlite, libcurl, libxml2 is forbidden, the dependencies will be automatically picked up by rpm. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires - Is the prefix argument for both make and make install really necessary? - I wouldn't include %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/* instead I'd remove that directory after install and list the documentation under %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061835.n56IZi2D010507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-06 14:35:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - I wouldn't include > %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}/* > instead I'd remove that directory after install and list the documentation > under %doc. In fact you have to fix this, since %doc README LICENSE already creates %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name}-%{version} and puts the files there, having a %{_defaultdocdir}/%{name} too is confusing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:40:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:40:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061840.n56Ieiox011649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #19 from Paul Fox 2009-06-06 14:40:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > > > > we could -- in fact, the daemon could simply change the permissions itself. > > are you concerned that users can't change the brightness themselves? or that > > the script runs as root? > > The former. okay. i pretty much agree. i'll think about how best to open up those permissions. > > should this still use the macro in that case? > > The macro is useful if we decide to change our arch again, but as long as you > are following Fedora's development you can also use BuildArch: i386 again, I > don't really mind. i guess i thought that if the objection to BuildArch: %{ix86} was that it would build for too many archs, that the same would be true for ExclusiveArch: %{ix86}. i think i don't understand the different clearly enough. paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 18:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 14:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061844.n56IiD30012175@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #9 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-06 14:44:12 EDT --- There is a missing: Requires: sdcc Tip(not obliged, _makes_it_sexy_) : try to separate fedora related content and content that can be pushed to upstream by 2 empty lines above and 2 empty lines below. Sometimes it is also useful for packages of other distribution to pull some lines from your spec file :) scratch built was successful: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/scratch/chitlesh/task_1397139/ Update the package, for final review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061924.n56JO9kP018398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-06 15:24:08 EDT --- #1: can you give me your FAS username please ? and apply for the packager status at https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/packager #2 add %{?_smp_mflags} to your make in the %build section #3: wrong URL Correct the URL to: http://gnusim8085.sourceforge.net/ #4: Preserve timestamps make INSTALL="install -p" DESTDIR=%{buildroot} install #5: docs %doc %{_datadir}/doc/gnusim8085/ should rather be : %doc ABOUT-NLS AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING NEWS README TODO %doc doc/examples/ doc/asm-guide.txt Add the following line at the end of the %install rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir} #6: Summary should be clear: "A 8085 Simulator" #7: %description missing fullstop. #8: License is GPL version 2 only : GPLv2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061927.n56JRhWX028274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #6 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-06 15:27:42 EDT --- #9: file doc/gnusim8085.1 should be copied to mandir at the end of the %install section cp -p doc/gnusim8085.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061936.n56JaxX1020424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 15:36:57 EDT --- Only commenting for the previous comments (I have not checked the srpm from the submitter itself) (In reply to comment #1) > Legend: > +: OK > -: not ok, see notes > N: Not applicable > ?: Not sure, please comment > > ? MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . > Specfile does not define buildroot, is that ok? - This can be ignored (on rpm 4.4.X BuildRoot in spec file defines %buildroot. on rpm 4.6+ BuildRoot is completely ignored and %buildroot is defined automatically) > - MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's > %files listings. [13] > > Don't know why this happens, nut buildlog says: warning: File listed twice: > /usr/share/elgg/.htaccess > I asssume this is caused by the fact that you list both the file itself AND > %{elggdir} - Actually when the spec file contains -------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ -------------------------------------------------- (where foo is a directory) this contains the directory foo itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/. By the way, at least please specify full URL for Source0: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061941.n56JfYGj030444@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #4 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-06 15:41:33 EDT --- Buildroot is defined anyhow. I don't know how i managed to overlook it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502130] Review Request: openocd - Open On-Chip Debugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061944.n56JiBOw021463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502130 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-06 15:44:10 EDT --- #1: The contents of /usr/share/openocd/contrib should go to %doc %doc contrib/ and remove the /usr/share/openocd/contrib at the end of the %install section to avoid duplicates #2: source url should be complete #3: Preserve timestamps add INSTALL="install -p" to your make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:45:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:45:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061945.n56JjGkK021915@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Summary|Review Request: cups-bjnp- |Review Request: cups-bjnp - |cups backend for Canon bjnp |cups backend for Canon bjnp |(USB over IP) printers |(USB over IP) printers Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 15:45:14 EDT --- Okay. -------------------------------------------------------- This package (cups-bjnp) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). ! But I don't recommend to request for Fedora 9 branch because Fedora 9 will be EOF after about one month. If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061948.n56JmUMQ031278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #26 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-06 15:48:29 EDT --- %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt should only be placed once and preferably on the %{name}/main package. It is not important that all -devel should entail documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 19:59:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 15:59:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906061959.n56JxvHQ023686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-06 15:59:56 EDT --- Conrad, if you are still confronting with unstripped-binary-or-object rpmlint warning, would you check if you have "redhat-rpm-config" surely installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 20:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062008.n56K85c8001745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #14 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-06 16:08:04 EDT --- Thanks for the quick response and sponsoring me! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 20:52:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:52:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062052.n56KqddD008397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #20 from Paul Fox 2009-06-06 16:52:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: olpc-kbdshim Short Description: grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop Owners: pgf Branches: F-9 F-11 InitialCC: (i suspect that the deadline for getting packages into F-9 may have passed. if it's possible to make an exception, i think it would be a good thing: it would make this package available to all current owners of XO laptops immediately.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 21:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] New: Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Summary: Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lxtnow at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/ruby-json.spec SRPM URL: http://laxathom.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/ruby-json/ruby-json-1.1.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a implementation of the JSON specification according to RFC 4627 in Ruby. You can think of it as a low fat alternative to XML, if you want to store data to disk or transmit it over a network rather than use a verbose markup language. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 21:20:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:20:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062120.n56LKhXP012459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-06 17:20:41 EDT --- 1. The README_License_msm file (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/README_License_msm) has been added, with the correspondence clarifying the license issue: that package follows GPLv2+. 2. The URL has been changed, so as to reflect the actual Web site of the R-msm package (http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/msm/index.html). 3. The %check was commented... because I forgot to uncomment it (I usually first test building packages without enabling the tests, as they take a lot of time) :) The new RPM package proposal is therefore below: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/R-msm.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/2/R-msm-0.8.2-2.fc10.src.rpm (to check the differences, the older versions are to be found at the following location: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/msm/082/1/) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 21:23:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:23:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062123.n56LNhHK003407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 --- Comment #5 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-06 17:23:42 EDT --- SRPM URL gives 404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 21:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 17:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062150.n56LoSXt016807@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #2 from Terje R??sten 2009-06-06 17:50:27 EDT --- Some initial remarks: o it don't work: Settings -> Configure Mailody -> Servers -> IMAP servers tab only gives: The module could not be found The diagnostics is: The desktop file could not be found. Missing buildreq on some imap libs or missing req on some kde imap libs? o Missing desktop install etc, please read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Desktop_files o Why don't simplify %dir %{_datadir}/kde4/apps/mailody %{_datadir}/kde4/apps/mailody/* to %{_datadir}/kde4/apps/mailody o Should the top %define be switched to %global? - -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 22:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062203.n56M362L009636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 --- Comment #3 from Terje R??sten 2009-06-06 18:03:05 EDT --- koji build for rawhide is good: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397272 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 22:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] New: Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Summary: Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: josephsmidt at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Healpy, a GPLv2+ package, provides a python package to manipulate healpix maps. It is based on the standard numeric and visualisation tools for Python, Numpy and matplotlib. The website is here: http://code.google.com/p/healpy/. Binding for Healpix in C, Fortran and C++ already exist in Fedora. This will add Python to that list. Here is rpmlint: rpmlint healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.i386.rpm healpy.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib I don't know what to do about this error since the package requires python-matplotlib for plotting, a major purpose of the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 23:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062311.n56NBZda028924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #7 from Byron Clark 2009-06-06 19:11:34 EDT --- I removed the python and perl BuildRequires. Unfortunately, I think the ruby BuildRequire needs to stay because I need the ruby executable and ruby-devel only seems to pull in ruby-libs. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl-0.20-4.fc11.src.rpm Also, this is my first package so I'll need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 23:24:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:24:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062324.n56NOBNJ031017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-06 19:24:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Here is rpmlint: > rpmlint healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.i386.rpm > healpy.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib > > I don't know what to do about this error since the package requires > python-matplotlib for plotting, a major purpose of the program. That's completely fine. rpmlint is most likely confused by "lib" substring, wrongly concluding that it is a package that contains an ELF shared library that should be depended on automatically. It's perfectly OK to depend on a python library explicitely. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 6 23:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 19:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906062332.n56NWrLH023524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #3 from Byron Clark 2009-06-06 19:32:52 EDT --- Unfortunately the prefix argument is required for both make and make install because it is used to build a #define for the location of the locale files. All other comments have been fixed in the package. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter-2.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 00:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 20:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070029.n570TYA4001084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lvillani at binaryhelix.net Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 01:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 21:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070138.n571cHkq023986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #37 from Paul Lange 2009-06-06 21:38:15 EDT --- Hey Mauricio, the upstream tarball build well in mock. What have you tried and whats your system? (btw, the diff between your tarball and the official one shows no changes at mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in) s the version of To version numbers: Every version of your package needs an unique identifier. We use a [project-version]-[package-release] form, where [project-version] is the version of the upstream project and [package-release] the version of the package (which starts from 1 for each new upstream version btw) The release number at the beginning of the spec-file should be the same as the latest changelog entry. Because of this I said we should take three, because there currently are 3 entries. We could replace them by one, then we would set release number to 1 again. I would support that, maybe with a text like this: * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-1 - Initial packaging with help by Ryan Bair Hope this makes things clearer for you!? Furthermore could we have a better package description? Thanks for your work! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 06:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 02:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070628.n576S3Z4012916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #7 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2009-06-07 02:28:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > #1: can you give me your FAS username please ? FAS username is sherry151 > and apply for the packager status at > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/group/view/packager done > Add the following line at the end of the %install > rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_docdir} Can I not put this in the %clean section? I made the suggested changes to the spec file and also some other changes necessary. #1 mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1 was necessary for building successfully #2 %{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz for packaging the man file http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085.spec: Release 3 spec file http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085-1.3.5-3.fc10.src.rpm: Release 3 SRPM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 07:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 03:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070734.n577Yh0h016274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 03:34:42 EDT --- - The BRs are incorrect. BuildRequires: python should be BuildRequires: python-devel and BuildRequires: gcc-c++ can be safely dropped (it's in the default buildroot). ?? The package uses BOTH python_sitearch AND python_sitelib?? (Are you building on x86, then these will point to the same place?) - Why on Earth do you mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/data %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/data as this will probably break functionality..? - As the Healpix C++ package is included in the distribution, you need to find a way to remove it and use healpix-c++-devel instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 08:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 04:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070850.n578o9Ee002490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #8 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-07 04:50:08 EDT --- #1: some typos in the description : stac and microproessor I think the description should be: GNUSim8085 is a graphical simulator for Intel 8085 microprocessor assembly language. It has many features including a keypad which can be used to write assembly language programs. It also has stack, memory and port viewers which can be used for debugging the programs. #2: directory ownership in %files %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gnusim8085/gnusim8085_icon.png the directory %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gnusim8085/ should be owned by the package. Hence %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gnusim8085/gnusim8085_icon.png should be %{_datadir}/pixmaps/gnusim8085/ #3: The package is ready. I have sponsored you. Update the spec file and SRPM. I'll complete the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428567] Review Request: ETL - Extended Template Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070909.n5799F3L013154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 --- Comment #76 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 05:09:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #75) > Lubomir etc, could you please review this alternate patch: > > http://patches.synfig.org/r/25/diff/#index_header Seems very well. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:11:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:11:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] New: Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 Summary: Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-SemiAffordanceAcces sor OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module does not provide any methods. Simply loading it changes the default naming policy for the loading class so that accessors are separated into get and set methods. The get methods have the same name as the accessor, while set methods are prefixed with "set_".If you define an attribute with a leading underscore, then the set method will start with "_set_".If you explicitly set a "reader" or "writer" name when creating an attribute, then that attribute's naming scheme is left unchanged. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397614 Additional Comment: This is a BR of a new BR of the latest GA Catalyst::Devel. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:12:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:12:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070912.n579Cu3D014059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 --- Comment #5 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-06-07 05:12:55 EDT --- Merci, je suis le plus vite possible, et que j'ai ?galement mise ? jour de eZ Publish 4.1.2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:10:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070910.n579AE2V013659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Guillaume Kulakowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-06-07 05:10:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-ezc-Webdav Short Description: Set up and run your own WebDAV server Owners: llaumgui Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070915.n579FPXq009008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:15:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:15:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070915.n579FCrm008879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070924.n579OFKt010951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 05:24:14 EDT --- - Fix the tabbing on the BuildRequires line. rpmlint output: gtkmm-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] gtkmm-utils-example.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib gtkmm-utils-example.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. - You will need to fix the rpath problem with sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool after %configure. ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging /Guidelines#Removing_Rpath ) - Add comments to %install phase, e.g. %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' # Remove object files from examples going into %doc rm -rf examples/.deps/ examples/.libs examples/*.o examples/Makefile* # Fix incorrect permissions chmod 755 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT{_libdir}/*.so.* # Install compiled examples into %{_libdir}/%{name} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}/ mv examples/{logging,multi-completion,tiles-simple} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/%{name}/ - Put the examples/ in the %doc of the -examples package, not in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070929.n579Trpk012228@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #33 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 05:29:52 EDT --- - Drop HACKING from %doc, it's related to compilation. - You are missing BuildRequires: graphviz since sh: dot: command not found Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"classGtk_1_1EventBox__inherit__graph.dot" -Tpng -o "classGtk_1_1EventBox__inherit__graph.png"' - The doc package is quite small (82K), I'd put the documentation in -devel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070940.n579eLSC014902@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #34 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 05:40:20 EDT --- MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. NEEDSWORK - %install phase needs comments and can be cleaned up, see above. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is LGPLv2+ not LGPLv3. (see source code headers) MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. NA MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - The current contents of the %doc package %{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils/html is not OK since a) nothing would own %{_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils/ b) the packages would have different documentation directories. Listing files as %doc puts them into %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}. You will need to rm -rf {_datadir}/doc/gtkmm-utils at the end of the install phase and just list the documentation as %doc docs/html/* Get rid of the -doc package and put this in -devel since it's small in size. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. NEEDSWORK - Documentation is not large, I wouldn't put it in -doc. MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Drop HACKING, it's not relevant. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:43:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:43:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070943.n579h7TW020802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #35 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 05:43:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > rpmlint output: > gtkmm-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/usr/lib64'] > gtkmm-utils-example.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > gtkmm-utils-example.x86_64: W: no-documentation > 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. The example warning is caused by the files not being actually executables; they are placeholders that need to be replaced by executables by make install. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 09:44:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 05:44:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906070944.n579iLNC015505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #36 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 05:44:21 EDT --- Also, on second thought: I think it's better to place the example binaries in %{_bindir} and just rename them, say: tiles-simple -> gtkmm-utils-tiles-simple and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 10:28:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 06:28:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071028.n57ASmI3030417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #16 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-07 06:28:46 EDT --- Notes: * Use full patch for Source0: http://dfn.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/flamerobin/flamerobin-0.9.2-src.tar.gz * remove --mandir explicit parameter passing (%configure already makes it) * change %makeinstall to "make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT" * this line is not needed at all "mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications" Other things looks sane. Here is a koji scratch build withall these changes: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397625 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071114.n57BE1Jf006785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #35 from Hongli Lai 2009-06-07 07:13:59 EDT --- Also, could you wait for the 2.2.3 release, which is scheduled for next week? *A lot* of bugs have been fixed in this release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:12:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:12:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071112.n57BCoAm006688@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Hongli Lai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |honglilai at gmail.com --- Comment #34 from Hongli Lai 2009-06-07 07:12:47 EDT --- Hi Mamoru. I am one of the authors of Phusion Passenger, and I want to comment on several issues here: == Vendoring Boost We actually use a modified version of Boost, so Phusion Passenger will not compile against a stock Boost. I understand your concerns with regard to security, but please rest assured because we fully understand the security implications of vendoring a library. We will take full responsibilities for any security problems; that is, we will either backport security fixes or upgrade our vendored Boost to a newer version. I hope this addresses any concerns that you might have with regard to vendoring Boost. If not then I'm eager to hear your thoughts on it. == native_support.so I don't think the cp command there is correct. Phusion Passenger loads native_support.so by calling "require 'phusion_passenger/native_support'", so the file must be inside a 'phusion_passenger' directory. == -devel subpackage Phusion Passenger should not be split into a regular and a -devel subpackage. We do not provide developer headers or libraries. The source files in the ext subdirectory are not used during runtime, so they can be safely omitted from the RPMs. The lib subdirectory however must be present. == test subdirectory The test subdirectory contains unit tests and integration tests, and are only useful for Phusion Passenger developers, not for Phusion Passenger users. You can safely omit this subdirectory in the RPMs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] New: Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-treetop.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-treetop-1.2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Treetop is a language for describing languages. It helps you analyze syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] New: Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-syntax.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-syntax-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Syntax is a lexical analysis framework. It supports pluggable syntax modules, and comes with modules for Ruby, XML, and YAML. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] New: Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rubigen.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rubigen-1.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs (like the "rails" command does for Ruby on Rails, and the 'script/generate' command within a Rails application during development). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504471] New: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-sinatra.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-sinatra-0.9.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Sinatra is a DSL intended for quickly creating web-applications in Ruby with minimal effort. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] New: Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-term-ansicolor.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-term-ansicolor-1.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Small Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] New: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-cucumber.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-cucumber-0.3.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Cucumber lets software development teams describe how software should behave in plain text. The text is written in a business-readable domain-specific language and serves as documentation, automated tests and development-aid. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] New: Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rack-test.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-test-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Rack::Test is a small, simple testing API for Rack apps. It can be used on its own or as a reusable starting point for Web frameworks and testing libraries to build on. Most of its initial functionality is an extraction of Merb 1.0's request helpers feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:45:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] New: Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-newgem.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-newgem-1.4.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Within this gem, you get one thing - newgem - an executable to create your own gems. Your new gems will include designated folders for Ruby code, test files, executables, and even a default website page for you to explain your project, and which instantly uploads to RubyForge website (which looks just like this one by default) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] New: Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-diff-lcs.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-diff-lcs-1.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Diff::LCS is a port of Algorithm::Diff that uses the McIlroy-Hunt longest common subsequence (LCS) algorithm to compute intelligent differences between two sequenced enumerable containers. The implementation is based on Mario I. Wolczko's Smalltalk version (1.2, 1993) and Ned Konz's Perl version (Algorithm::Diff). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504472] New: Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-shotgun.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-shotgun-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is an automatic reloading version of the rackup command that's shipped with Rack. It can be used as an alternative to the complex reloading logic provided by web frameworks or in environments that don't support application reloading. The shotgun command starts one of Rack's supported servers (e.g., mongrel, thin, webrick) and listens for requests but does not load any part of the actual application. Each time a request is received, it forks, loads the application in the child process, processes the request, and exits the child process. The result is clean, application-wide reloading of all source files and templates on each request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:45:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:45:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] New: Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-configuration.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-configuration-0.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Ruby configuration gem provides a mechanism for configuring ruby programs with ruby configuration files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:45:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:45:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] New: Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-builder.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-builder-2.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Builder provides a number of builder objects that make creating structured data simple to do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] New: Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-polyglot.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-polyglot-0.2.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This Ruby GEM allows custom language loaders for specified file extensions to be hooked into require. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:45:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:45:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504477] New: Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-launchy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-launchy-0.3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Launchy is helper class for launching cross-platform applications in a fire and forget manner. There are application concepts (browser, email client, etc) that are common across all platforms, and they may be launched differently on each platform. Launchy is here to make a common approach to launching external application from within ruby programs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071157.n57BvaNP009760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 07:57:35 EDT --- rubygem-cucumber.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/doc/cucumber-0.3.10/examples/dos_line_endings/features/dos_line_endings.feature This file demonstrates CRLF handling, therefore is ok to have CRLF line endings. rubygem-cucumber.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/cucumber-0.3.10/rails_generators/cucumber/templates/cucumber 0644 This is ok as well -- it is a script template, has a shebang but should not be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 11:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 07:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071158.n57BwsjK010000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 07:58:53 EDT --- rubygem-diff-lcs.noarch: W: invalid-license Artistic This actual license is "GPLv2+ or Ruby or Artistic" which is indeed valid. I suspect rpmlint only recognizes "Artistic" in "GPL+ or Artistic" a.k.a. "Perl license". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 12:01:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 08:01:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071201.n57C1eoB010819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 08:01:39 EDT --- rubygem-rubigen.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubigen-1.5.2/.autotest Upstream seems to use this, I prefer not to deviate from them. rubygem-rubigen.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/rubigen-1.5.2/rubygems_generators/application_generator/templates/bin 0644 Template for script, ok to have a shebang, should not be executable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 12:00:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 08:00:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071200.n57C0j9i010679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 08:00:43 EDT --- rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.4.1/app_generators/newgem/templates/script/console.erb 0644 rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.4.1/rubygems_generators/executable/templates/bin/app.rb.erb 0644 rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.4.1/newgem_generators/install_website/templates/script/txt2html 0644 Template of a script -- has a shebang but should not be executable. rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.4.1/website/version.js rubygem-newgem.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.4.1/app_generators/newgem_simple/templates/lib/templates.rb rubygem-newgem.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/newgem-1.4.1/website/version.txt I can't see how these could cause problem and prefer not to deviate from upstream, but will get rid of them if reviewer wishes so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 12:02:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 08:02:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071202.n57C2c9q016343@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 08:02:37 EDT --- Note for reviewer: feel free to review this (I'll be thankful), but please do not approve it yet; it is pending resolution of a licensing issue (see SPEC file for details). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 13:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 09:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] New: Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 Summary: Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fkooman at tuxed.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard-4.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: ProGuard is a free Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier. It detects and removes unused classes, fields, methods, and attributes. It optimizes bytecode and removes unused instructions. It renames the remaining classes, fields, and methods using short meaningless names. Finally, it preverifies the processed code for Java 6 or for Java Micro Edition. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 13:33:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 09:33:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071333.n57DXoC5004179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #2 from Christian Krause 2009-06-07 09:33:48 EDT --- I've reviewed the package and it looks ok. There are only some minor and uncritical issues: * rpmlint: TODO rpmlint SPECS/libxdg-basedir.spec SRPMS/libxdg-basedir-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm RPMS/i386/libxdg-basedir-* libxdg-basedir.i386: W: no-documentation libxdg-basedir-devel.i386: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. In general it is not a problem to have no documentation if a package doesn't provide any. ;-) However, in this specific case the package provides a doxygen API documentation (make doxygen-all). It would be good if it could be added to the devel package. * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name * sources: TODO - e32bcfa772fb57e8e1acdf9616a8d567 libxdg-basedir-1.0.0.tar.gz - sources matches upstream - Source0 tag ok - spectool -g works - upstream version 1.0.1 was released a couple of weeks ago, please update to the new version (according to upstream's git repo it looks like a minor bug fix release) * License: TODO - License MIT acceptable - License in spec file matches the actual license (MIT license header in libxdg-basedir-1.0.0/src/basedir.c ) - No License file included, so there is no need to package it. - It would be better if upstream would provide a license file. According to the Review guidelines the packager is encouraged to query upstream to include it. However this will not block the review. * spec file written in English and legible: OK * compilation: OK - supports parallel build - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used - builds in mock (F10) - builds in koji: F10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394643 F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394648 F12: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397616 * BuildRequires: OK - no build requires are necessary * locales handling: OK (n/a) * ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * package owns all directories that it creates: TODO - %{_libdkir}/pkgconfig is created, but not owned by libxdg-basedir-devel - please add a "Requires: pkgconfig" to the devel package * no files listed twice in %files: OK * file permissions: OK - %defattr used - actual permissions in packages ok * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * header files in -devel subpackage: OK * static libraries in -static package: OK (n/a) * package containing *.pc files must "Requires: pkgconfig": TODO (see above) * *.so link in -devel package: OK * - devel package requires base package using fully versioned dependency: OK * packages must not contain *.la files: OK * GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: OK (n/a) * packages must not own files/dirs already owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install: OK * all filenames UTF-8: OK * functional test: OK - compiling the provided test applications tests/testfind and tests/testdump - test apps compile successfully and the reported directory names seem to be meaningful * debuginfo sub-package: OK - non-empty - debuginfo file works together with gdb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] New: Tracker: Duplication of system libraries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tracker: Duplication of system libraries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Summary: Tracker: Duplication of system libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Dup lication_of_system_libraries OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cassmodiah at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: These packages in Fedora are with internals Additional info: 1) #134 (Approval needed - zsync needs to ship internal zlib for rsync compatibility) - FESCo - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/134 2)http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/fedora-meeting/2009/fedora-meeting.2009-06-04-16.33.log.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:17:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:17:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071417.n57EHxjV014949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |490140 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071419.n57EJ3JS015185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |495310 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:17:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:17:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490140] Review Request: zsync - Client-side implementation of the rsync algorithm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071417.n57EHvnx014902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490140 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|495310 |504493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:25:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:25:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071425.n57EPuZH011802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #9 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2009-06-07 10:25:55 EDT --- Updated the spec file and srpm. Following are the urls: http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085.spec: Release 4 spec file http://sherry151.fedorapeople.org/gnusim8085-1.3.5-4.fc10.src.rpm: Release 4 SRPM I will be waiting for review completion. Thanks Rangeen Basu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071442.n57Eg4V7015034@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 10:42:02 EDT --- Some basic comments (please also consider to apply the following comments to the rest of your rubygem related review requests). - Use %global instead of %define: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Pure_Ruby_packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define - Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 is missing https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines And for consistency I recommend to add BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 - As you have already defined %geminstdir, please use it also at %files and so on - %geminstdir/[A-Z]* should be marked as %doc - Please check if Rakefile or install.rb are needed for binary rpm. --------------------------------------------------------------------- # Examples are documentation mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/examples \ $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} --------------------------------------------------------------------- - Note that --------------------------------------------------------------------- $ gem contents term-ansicolor --------------------------------------------------------------------- expects that examples/ directory should be under %geminstdir. While we allow (don't forbid) to delete some files listed in "$ gem contents ") if packagers think they are not needed, I don't think moving examples/ directory under %gemdir/doc is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071446.n57EkPXM015897@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504497 Depends on|504497 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 14:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 10:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071444.n57EiuFi015336@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504497 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 15:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071500.n57F0QTk018804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-07 11:00:25 EDT --- Thanks for picking this up (In reply to comment #1) > Some basic comments (please also consider to apply the following > comments to the rest of your rubygem related review requests). > > - Use %global instead of %define: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Pure_Ruby_packages > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define > > - Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 is missing > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines > And for consistency I recommend to add > BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 > > - As you have already defined %geminstdir, please use it also at > %files and so on > > - %geminstdir/[A-Z]* should be marked as %doc Will fix. These four (and maybe others) will be common for most other rubygem packages I have submitted today. I'm wondering if it would make sense if I copied this to other reviews; or what can I do to prevent duplicate reviewer work. Also, this was all generated by gem2rpm, we probably should fix the tool as well. > - Please check if Rakefile or install.rb are needed for binary rpm. Will do. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > # Examples are documentation > mv $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/examples \ > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version} > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > - Note that > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > $ gem contents term-ansicolor > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > expects that examples/ directory should be under %geminstdir. > While we allow (don't forbid) to delete some files listed in > "$ gem contents ") if packagers think they are not needed, > I don't think moving examples/ directory under %gemdir/doc is > needed. Will revert. This applies to more packages I submitted today as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 15:06:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:06:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071506.n57F6EbT020144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 11:06:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Thanks for picking this up > > (In reply to comment #1) > > Some basic comments (please also consider to apply the following > > comments to the rest of your rubygem related review requests). > > > > Will fix. These four (and maybe others) will be common for most other rubygem > packages I have submitted today. I'm wondering if it would make sense if I > copied this to other reviews; or what can I do to prevent duplicate reviewer > work. I think you can just modify your rest srpm and don't have to copy my comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 15:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071503.n57F3Ym4019339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #36 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 11:03:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > == Vendoring Boost > > We actually use a modified version of Boost, so Phusion Passenger will not > compile against a stock Boost. I understand your concerns with regard to > security, but please rest assured because we fully understand the security > implications of vendoring a library. We will take full responsibilities for any > security problems; that is, we will either backport security fixes or upgrade > our vendored Boost to a newer version. > > I hope this addresses any concerns that you might have with regard to vendoring > Boost. If not then I'm eager to hear your thoughts on it. CC-ing to Toshio. Would you comment on this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 15:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071522.n57FM1SS023792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 15:53:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071553.n57Frx2S002694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #3 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-07 11:53:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > - The BRs are incorrect. > BuildRequires: python > should be > BuildRequires: python-devel Sorry if I made a mistake here, but the packaging guidelines for Python state to use python, not python-devel: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python > ?? The package uses BOTH python_sitearch AND python_sitelib?? (Are you building > on x86, then these will point to the same place?) Again, sorry if this was a mistake, this package has C/C++ libraries and the above guidelines seem to suggest you use python_sitelib for normal Python modules and python_sitearch for "libraries (like those written in C)". I've never dealt with a Python program with these kind of libraries before so I got confused. > > - Why on Earth do you > mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ > mv %{buildroot}%{python_sitelib}/%{name}/data > %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/data > as this will probably break functionality..? > Because they are just example .fits files. However, I will put them back. > - As the Healpix C++ package is included in the distribution, you need to find > a way to remove it and use healpix-c++-devel instead. Okay, I will do this and the other things. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071622.n57GMwQD008883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |502227 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071622.n57GMv1D008862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504076 --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-07 12:22:55 EDT --- ######################################### # MUST ITEMS ######################################### --> rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: [lvillani at enterprise i386]$ rpmlint *.rpm virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.0.11 ['5.0.11-1.fc11', '5.0.11-1'] virtuoso-opensource.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/virtodbcu_r.so virtodbcu_r.so virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/virtodbcu_r.so exit at GLIBC_2.0 virtuoso-opensource.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/virtodbcu.so virtodbcu.so virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/virtodbcu.so exit at GLIBC_2.0 virtuoso-opensource.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/virtodbc.so virtodbc.so virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/virtodbc.so exit at GLIBC_2.0 virtuoso-opensource.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/virtodbc_r.so virtodbc_r.so virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/virtodbc_r.so exit at GLIBC_2.0 virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: dangling-relative-symlink /var/lib/virtuoso/db/virtuoso.ini ../../..//etc/virtuoso/virtuoso.ini virtuoso-opensource-apps.i586: W: no-documentation virtuoso-opensource-conductor.noarch: W: no-documentation virtuoso-opensource-utils.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 9 warnings. >From the %changelog: * Fri May 22 2009 Rex Dieter 5.0.11 this should be 5.0.11-1 virtuoso-opensource.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/virtodbcu_r.so exit at GLIBC_2.0 I don't know how to deal with that but I guess it can be ignored virtuoso-opensource.i586: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/virtodbcu_r.so virtodbcu_r.so Kevin told me that this isn't a showstopper since these libraries should be dlopened and not linked. However, I think it's better to ask upstream to move these libraries off %_libdir To sum up: - The changelog issue must be fixed - shared-lib-calls-exit -> This is a problem in their code but I don't think it's a showstopper - invalid-soname -> This is not a showstopper but ping upstream, if possible, and ask them to change the path in a future release - no-documentation in subpackages -> Not a problem --> The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines Status: PASS --> The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. Status: PASS --> The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines Status: PASS --> The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. Status: PASS Additional comments: Package license is GPL2 and the exemptions seems acceptable to me. --> The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Status: PASS --> If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Status: PASS --> The spec file must be written in American English. Status: PASS --> The spec file for the package MUST be legible. Status: PASS --> The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. Status: PASS --> The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Status: PASS Additional comments: The scratch build shows that it builds on all supported architectures --> If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. Status: PASS --> All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Status: PASS --> The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. Status: PASS --> Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. Status: PASS Additional comments: The package seems to install only dlopen'ed files, I guess there's no need to run ldconfig --> If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. Status: PASS --> A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: The main package owns an empty directory: %{_libdir}/virtuoso The -apps subpackage creates %{_libdir}/virtuoso/hosting I suggest that only the -apps subpackage get ownership on that directory I guess that a similar approach could be applied to %_datadir/virtuoso/vad --> A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. Status: PASS --> Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. Status: PASS --> Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Status: PASS --> Each package must consistently use macros. Status: PASS --> The package must contain code, or permissable content. Status: PASS --> Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: It seems there's plenty of documentation in docsrc subdirectory but you're not shipping it. --> If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. Status: PASS --> Header files must be in a -devel package. Status: PASS --> Static libraries must be in a -static package. Status: PASS --> Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). Status: PASS --> If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. Status: PASS Additional comments: This package seems to not contain linkable libraries --> In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Status: PASS --> Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. Status: *** FAIL *** Additional comments: %_libdir/virtuoso/hosting contains creolewiki.la mediawiki.la and wikiv.la files --> Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. Status: PASS --> Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. Status: PASS --> At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Status: PASS --> All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Status: PASS ######################################### # SHOULD ITEMS ######################################### --> If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Status: PASS --> The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. Status: PASS --> The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Status: PASS --> The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. Status: PASS Additional comments: The scratch build confirms that it builds on all supported architectures --> The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. Status: PASS Additional comments: A quick test showed that the main executable work. --> If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. Status: PASS --> Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. Status: PASS --> The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb.If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Status: PASS Generated with reviewtool 0.0.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:40:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:40:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071640.n57GesoS012702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 12:40:53 EDT --- For 0.4.1-2: * BR (BuildRequires) - "BR: python-devel" instead of "BR: python" is needed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1395448 * Documents - Please consider to also add the following files as %doc: ---------------------------------------------------------- ChangeLog TODO ---------------------------------------------------------- * %changelog - I recommend to add one line between each %changelog entry (as this is useful when importing packages into Fedora CVS) like: ---------------------------------------------------------- * Mon May 25 2009 Byron Clark 0.4.1-2 - Fix typo in upstream URL. * Sun May 24 2009 Byron Clark 0.4.1-1 - Initial release ---------------------------------------------------------- * Misc rpmlint issue ---------------------------------------------------------- lazygal.src: W: strange-permission lazygal-0.4.1.tar.gz 0600 lazygal.src: W: strange-permission lazygal.spec 0600 ---------------------------------------------------------- - Please change the permission of files in srpm to 0644. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071647.n57GlNLP009669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(leamas.alec at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 12:47:21 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071645.n57GjXGp009357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(leamas.alec at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 12:45:31 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071648.n57Gmmrt014479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #25 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-07 12:48:45 EDT --- Again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:48:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:48:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071648.n57Gm5j3014359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:47:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071647.n57GlcvM014276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #10 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-07 12:47:37 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as COPYING - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 16:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 12:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071650.n57Got8j010418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-07 12:50:54 EDT --- Read how to request CVS access https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/19#comment:8 Also apply for the EL-5 branch and add me into the owners :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 18:56:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 14:56:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906071856.n57IunTX008436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #17 from Philippe Makowski 2009-06-07 14:56:48 EDT --- ok, changes made : Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin.spec koji scratch builds are ok : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397855 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397860 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397864 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072008.n57K84lC015001@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #37 from Toshio Kuratomi 2009-06-07 16:08:02 EDT --- Short answer: vendoring or bundling of libraries is not allowed. Long answer: you can request an exception from FESCo but it's not likely to be granted with just the reasons you've given here. When you bundle a library and, on top of that, modify it so it no longer matches upstream, you are starting the process of forking the library. This may not seem like much of an issue to a developer. (Hey, I just have one or two forked libraries, no problem for me to track security issues.) But it makes life much more difficult for distributions. There are places that this shows up. * Security. You touched on the fact that you've heard the security arguments but I'll go ahead on specify them here since there's many different places that this touches: - When a security flaw is discovered in a library and bundling is not allowed, The library can be fixed in a single package, that package rebuilt, and when users download it, all the applications that use it are immediately protected. When bundling is allowed, the distribution has to find all the packages that the library occurs in by auditing source code or running a special tool over all elf files in all packages, then all of those packages have to be fixed, all of those packages have to be built, and users have to download and update each of the ones that they are using on their system before they are protected. There is much more work involved when bundled libraries are involved. - With security issues, people want to remove as much lag as they can between announcement of a problem and the fix being available for users. When libraries are unbundled, tools like vendor-sec can be used to alert distributions of problems that need patching in their packages before the announcement is made and then they can fix them with zero days of vulnerability. If bundling of libraries occurs, then the problem becomes how to get fixes out to all affected packages. If the distribution patches those packages, they must be careful to not leak the fact that there is a security vulnerability before they are allowed (which means they need to be careful who they share the information and what information they share with others). OTOH, if they do not patch the packages bundling libraries, then those packages are not protected on zero day, but only afterwards. - When a security flaw appears, the program has to either update to a non-affected version of the library or backport a fix. This can be problematic when the code of the library has undergone many API and code changes since the version that is being bundled and the security fixing patch is very widespread. Many conflicts can arise that need time to fix when trying to backport the fixes but porting the application code to the new API version can also take a lot of time. - We cannot implicitly trust an upstream application to be on top of security issues that are released in the packages that they care about. What happens if you are not following boost development and don't know that a security release has been made? What happens if the developer that is responsible for watching boost development goes on vacation or quits your project? What happens if your application ceases active development? What happens if boost stops active development and security fixes start originating with distro patches? * Forking is occurring. Once an application starts bundling libraries, it's easy for the project to include local patches to the library to add features that upstream doesn't have or fix bugs that upstream hasn't addressed. This has several negative effects. - When a security issue appears, it becomes harder to fix the application bundling the library. If you attempt to upgrade to a newer version, you have to make sure your important local modifications get ported to the new version. If you attempt to backport, you have to merge the upstream fix to your own code-base which may have conflicts with the local modifications. - When working with the library that comes from upstream, there is a community of people who are interested in that library to fall back on for help. When working on your own private copy that community may not be interested in helping you work on your modified sources since they don't have control or knowledge of what your modified sources do. - Forking dilutes one of the strengths of open-source development. Instead of a project getting stronger with more people supplying patches to help drive the project and build a bigger community, the community of people interested in it are splintering, developing more and more divergent code-bases, solving the same problem over and over in different ways in different private copies of the library. Instead of everyone benefiting, everyone has to pay. * Bugfixes. Are usually of lesser importance from security issues but share the same issues arise. * Old versions of code linger on. If the application can bundle its own version of a library, the incentive to port to newer versions of the library are reduced. This exacerbates the problems of security and bugfix issues. Instead of progressively porting to newer versions of a library as time goes on, porting to newer versions becomes a chore that has to be performed at the same time as addressing a security flaw. This puts time pressure on the project when the work could have been spread out over a longer period if only the porting had been done all along. * Licensing. Although licensing issues can crop up in any project, projects which bundle code from different sources together are a special source of concern. They make auditing for license issues a larger project. One last note related more to what you wrote than to the reasons that bundling is not allowed in Fedora. You write that you are willing to: "take full responsibilities for any security problems; that is, we will either backport security fixes or upgrade our vendored Boost to a newer version." However, I wonder what that means to you. Are you guaranteeing that you will be able to produce zero day updates of your packages that include the fixes to your bundled boost at the same time as boost itself is updated? Are you saying that you will always be around to handle the problems that can arise? What happens if your responses are not timely enough to meet the needs of our users? Are you making a monetary guarantee? I think that attempting to say that you take full responsibility in this context should be approached with caution on your part as what it entails could be interpreted in many different ways. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:14:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] New: Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Summary: Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/SevenZip.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: SevenZip is the Java version of LZMA compressing and decompressing SDK. rpmlint: SevenZip.src:112: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name}/ This is a false warning since the package is not noarch by default. Koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397876 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072027.n57KRiiq023760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |492203 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072027.n57KRiiW023739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504521 Bug 492203 depends on bug 491581, which changed state. Bug 491581 Summary: Review Request: jVorbisEnc - Pure Java Ogg Vorbis Encoder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491581 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 492203 depends on bug 491578, which changed state. Bug 491578 Summary: Review Request: RasmusDSP - Embeddable Audio/MIDI processor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491578 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-07 16:27:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.src.rpm Changelog: 0.5.1-3.521svn - Update to svn revision 521 - Remove the bundled copy of SevenZip. Require Fedora's SevenZip instead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] New: Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells Alias: perl-SQL-Shell https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 Summary: Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SQL-Shell OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-SQL-Shell.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-SQL-Shell-1.14-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SQL::Shell is a command-interpreter API for building shells and batch scripts. A command-line interface with readline support is included as part of the CPAN distribution. See for a user guide. SQL::Shell offers features similar to the mysql or sql*plus client programs but is database independent. This package provides the backend SQL::Shell libraries. For the command-line interperter (sqlsh), please also install the sqlsh package. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397935 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:52:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:52:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072052.n57Kq6PU027429@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-07 16:52:05 EDT --- python-line_profiler-1.0-0.3.b2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-line_profiler-1.0-0.3.b2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072054.n57Ks044027600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com, | |katzj at redhat.com Component|Package Review |distribution AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:56:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:56:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072056.n57KuAne022456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|notting at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:55:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:55:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072055.n57KtLov022358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Silas Sewell 2009-06-07 16:55:20 EDT --- Built. Thanks Parag and Jason. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072057.n57KvjY0022648@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkeating at redhat.com, | |katzj at redhat.com Component|Package Review |distribution AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Bug 496433 depends on bug 497719, which changed state. Bug 497719 Summary: Update to the 1.9.x branch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497719 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072057.n57Kva8r022595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #38 from Hongli Lai 2009-06-07 16:57:35 EDT --- Toshio, I totally understand your points. We are well aware of all of those disadvantages of bundling/forking that you mentioned, but given our circumstances we decided that bundling/forking Boost is the best solution, despite all the aforementioned disadvantages. We made this decision a year ago, and to date we still think that it's the right decision. Regarding responsibility: what I meant is that we take security very seriously, and that we will do our best to address any security problems, including those in Boost, as opposed to neglecting Boost security issues and happily keeping on vendoring the old, insecure version. We treat any problems in Boost as if they are problems in our own code. Is this explanation sufficient for you? If not, what are your concerns? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 20:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 16:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504493] Tracker: Duplication of system libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072059.n57KxoRF022932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504493 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, jkeating at redhat.com, | |katzj at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 21:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226430] Merge Review: squashfs-tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072109.n57L94Jf029859@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226430 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-07 17:09:02 EDT --- Would you mind adding a disttag in the next build? TIA. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 21:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072113.n57LDuvw025250@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #4 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-07 17:13:55 EDT --- Okay, first of all I forgot to thank you for the review. I've patched the source so it doesn't build the Healpix-c++ package and also so that it links against the healpix-c++ and cfitsio libraries already in Fedora. I also think I have corrected the other mistakes you mentioned, unless I misunderstood. Thanks again. The new files are here with no change to rpmlint. Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 21:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072134.n57LYPro001136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-07 17:34:24 EDT --- imported, built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 21:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072134.n57LYQTv001167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Bug 502227 depends on bug 504076, which changed state. Bug 504076 Summary: Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 21:43:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 17:43:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072143.n57LhwvJ002600@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-07 17:43:57 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/virtuoso-opensource/virtuoso-opensource.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/virtuoso-opensource/virtuoso-opensource-5.0.11-2.src.rpm * Sun Jun 07 2009 Rex Dieter 5.0.11-2 - omit remaining .la files - fix %%changelog - fix virtuoso.ini dangling symlink -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 22:08:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:08:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072208.n57M8Q5l000316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-07 18:08:26 EDT --- Here are my notes for this package: - rpmlint is silent. - koji rawhide build seems fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397983 ! Please explain in the specfile as comments what Sources 1-3 are for. ! Not a blocker, but in the docs/ and examples/ directories, there are html, xml and pro files that refer to /usr/local/. You might want to fix them. ? Any reason why you don't put the jar files directly in /usr/share/java/ ? If you definitely need to put the jar files in /usr/share/java/proguard/ , can you replace %{_javadir}/%{name}* with %{_javadir}/%{name}/ in %files to indicate that this is a directory? * If a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a properly installed .desktop file. Please follow http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ! You need to specify a specific java version in BR and R. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires In your case this ought to be 1.5 * GCJ AOT bits SHOULD be built and included in packages. Since this package builds with java 1.5, this will bring great performance improvements on ppc* architectures. Please follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines Can you review my package (bug #504521 )? It is java too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 7 22:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 18:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906072217.n57MHQcj007320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-07 18:17:25 EDT --- - You have BuildRequires: healpix-c++-devel BuildRequires: cfitsio-devel so BuildRequires: healpix-c++ BuildRequires: cfitsio is redundant (these are pulled in by the -devel packages). - You are not building in %build. Use python setup.py build in %build and python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} in %install. - Without looking at its contents, INSTALL shouldn't probably be in %doc (if its only contents is instructions for installation from source, then it shouldn't be included). - You must in any case own the directory %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ so you can drop the three last lines from the %files section. - Add comment about the patch. Also, you could remove the internal healpix and cfitsio libraries from the extracted tarball in the setup phase so that one can be sure that they are not used instead of the Fedora packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 00:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 20:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080000.n5800SxM024475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #6 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-07 20:00:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > - You have > BuildRequires: healpix-c++-devel > BuildRequires: cfitsio-devel > so > BuildRequires: healpix-c++ > BuildRequires: cfitsio > is redundant (these are pulled in by the -devel packages). > I meant: Requires: healpix-c++ Requires: cfitsio so I believe this is now fixed. > - You are not building in %build. Use > python setup.py build > in %build and > python setup.py install -O1 --skip-build --root %{buildroot} > in %install. Done > > - Without looking at its contents, INSTALL shouldn't probably be in %doc (if > its only contents is instructions for installation from source, then it > shouldn't be included). > Done > - You must in any case own the directory > %{python_sitearch}/%{name}/ > so you can drop the three last lines from the %files section. > Done. I believe I did what you meant. > - Add comment about the patch. Done. > Also, you could remove the internal healpix and > cfitsio libraries from the extracted tarball in the setup phase so that one can > be sure that they are not used instead of the Fedora packages. Done. I have removed the entire directory containing the healpix and cfitsio libraries in the setup phase. The new files are again at: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080121.n581LZIf008657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-07 21:21:34 EDT --- Builds in koji rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398081 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080120.n581KVwb008452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Bug 492201 depends on bug 492197, which changed state. Bug 492197 Summary: Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:20:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080120.n581KVJM008471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 492197, which changed state. Bug 492197 Summary: Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:20:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:20:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080120.n581KUiY008427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-07 21:20:29 EDT --- Package built in rawhide, also in F-11, F-10 and F-9. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080132.n581WKKl004617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #9 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-07 21:32:19 EDT --- Updated http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080131.n581VRdN004408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #9 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-07 21:31:25 EDT --- http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.4-2.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string.spec Here are the updates -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:35:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080135.n581ZmBR005659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #5 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-07 21:35:46 EDT --- Updated with cabal2spec-0.16 http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/xmobar-0.9.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 01:34:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080134.n581YdpW005052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #10 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-07 21:34:37 EDT --- Here is my spec and srpm's maybe this can help things along. http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 03:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225698] Merge Review: dmidecode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080314.n583EsxS000998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225698 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mclasen at redhat.com, | |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-07 23:14:52 EDT --- I reviewed this package. It just needs very trivial fixes: * rpmlint says dmidecode.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog dmidecode.src:11: E: buildprereq-use /usr/bin/aclocal /usr/bin/automake /usr/bin/autoconf dmidecode.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-obsoletes kernel-utils dmidecode.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 5) dmidecode-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog dmidecode.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog dmidecode.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided kernel-utils These are all easy to fix. Use for instance rpmlint -I buildprereq-use to see what the complaint is about. * The release tag is a mess. Can we continue with the usual convention?: 2%{?dist} * Source0 must be full URL (with %{name} and %{version} macros) - Buildroot is improper but it will be obsoleted soon so it's not a problem. * We prefer %defattr(-,root,root,-) * Parallel make must be supported whenever possible. If it is not supported, this should be noted in the SPEC file as a comment. I added mclasen to the CC since he made the last known build. Sorry if this was not desired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 03:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2009 23:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497766] Review Request: paintdotnet - A mono port of the Paint.NET image editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080333.n583XCwP005016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497766 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review- --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-07 23:33:09 EDT --- Well. The package is sent to rpmfusion. Until someone steps forward and does the icon set matching, this cannot go to Fedora. Closing the bug WONTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:03:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:03:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080403.n5843Yso005674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080403.n5843P6L005614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-08 00:03:24 EDT --- Thanks. Now we have the rpmlints: python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/images/image_LICENSE.txt python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/images/image_LICENSE.txt python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/blue_view.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/red_view.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/black_view.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/green_view.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/person.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/example_workbench_window.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/dock/images/image_LICENSE.txt python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/example_workbench.py python-TraitsGUI.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4/examples/workbench/yellow_view.py When these are fixed, the package is good to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080410.n584AMfF007310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 00:10:21 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:17:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:17:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504544] New: Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification Alias: perl-Linux-Inotify2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504544 Summary: Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Linux-Inotify2 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Linux-Inotify2.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Linux-Inotify2-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module implements an interface to the Linux 2.6.13+ Inotify file/directory change notification sytem. It has a number of advantages over the Linux::Inotify module: - it is portable (Linux::Inotify only works on x86) - the equivalent of fullname works correctly - it is better documented - it has callback-style interface, which is better suited for integration. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398272 Additional Comment: This is a requirement of a new BR of the latest GA Catalyst::Devel. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080424.n584Ouq3010345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 00:24:55 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397935 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a313e85c6e22eda8d8df1fdb835e5437ddab6225 SQL-Shell-1.14.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=31, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.00 sys + 0.35 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.42 CPU) + Package perl-SQL-Shell-1.14-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(SQL::Shell) = 1.14 perl(SQL::Shell::Manual) = 1.6 perl(Tie::Rowset::InMemory) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(DBI) perl(File::Path) perl(IO::File) perl(URI::Escape) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Should 1) Add following for subpackage sqlsh %defattr(-,root,root,-) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080427.n584RvQl016676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 00:27:56 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397614 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c545632cf924e5733230beecc03b23e565b034c0 MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=12, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.01 sys + 0.19 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.25 CPU) + Package perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor-0.03-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(MooseX::SemiAffordanceAccessor) = 0.03 perl(MooseX::SemiAffordanceAccessor::Role::Attribute) Requires: perl(Moose) >= 0.55 perl(Moose::Exporter) perl(Moose::Role) perl(Moose::Util::MetaRole) perl(MooseX::SemiAffordanceAccessor::Role::Attribute) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080428.n584SK4k011384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 00:28:19 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/python-TraitsGUI.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-3.fc10.src.rpm Updated -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:36:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:36:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504544] Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080436.n584arQu018026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504544 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 00:36:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398272 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a4c62821471692abe60e8e91602b6b3bf140616c Linux-Inotify2-1.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=6, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.08 CPU) + Package perl-Linux-Inotify2-1.2-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: perl(Linux::Inotify2) = 1.2 perl(Linux::Inotify2::Event) perl(Linux::Inotify2::Watch) Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) perl(base) perl(Carp) perl(Fcntl) perl(Scalar::Util) rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Ask upstream to add perl license text in source files itself as we don't count license information based on COPYING file. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:43:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:43:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080443.n584hQIB018983@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080442.n584ghHu018870@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080443.n584hOqf018956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 00:43:23 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SQL-Shell Short Description: Command interpreter for DBI shells Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504544] Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080443.n584hauD019027@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504544 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:42:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:42:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080442.n584ga50018844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 00:42:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor Short Description: Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504544] Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080443.n584hYF5013607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504544 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 00:43:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Linux-Inotify2 Short Description: Scalable directory/file change notification Owners: cweyl Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:44:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:44:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-Apptools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080444.n584ivl4013782@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 00:44:55 EDT --- In my last request I made a mistake of wrong package name. :( Here is a new request: New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-AppTools Short Description: Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:48:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:48:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080448.n584mBx4014584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-08 00:48:09 EDT --- Thanks. Everything is good now. "sed -i" modifies the timestamps, you might consider preserving them but it's no big deal. --------------------------------------------------- This package (python-TraitsGUI) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthough Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080448.n584mv0Q014731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-Apptools - Enthough |python-AppTools - Enthough |Tool Suite Application |Tool Suite Application |Tools |Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080451.n584p6Zo015388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-AppTools - Enthough |python-AppTools - Enthought |Tool Suite Application |Tool Suite Application |Tools |Tools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080454.n584sauw021042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 00:54:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398290 - rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. perl-Pod-Abstract.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pod/Abstract/Filter/number_sections.pm perl-Pod-Abstract.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Pod/Abstract/Filter/unoverlay.pm ==> fix this + source files match upstream url dd1b4c0050da091ab2a78ac6e32bc6dd9dd18e17 Pod-Abstract-0.17.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=35, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.17 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.23 CPU) + Package perl-Pod-Abstract-0.17-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Pod::Abstract) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::BuildNode) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::add_podcmds) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::clear_podcmds) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::cut) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::find) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::number_sections) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::overlay) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::sort) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::summary) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::uncut) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter::unoverlay) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Node) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Parser) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Path) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Serial) = 0.17 perl(Pod::Abstract::Tree) = 0.17 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Temp) perl(IO::String) perl(Pod::Abstract) perl(Pod::Abstract::BuildNode) perl(Pod::Abstract::Filter) perl(Pod::Abstract::Node) perl(Pod::Abstract::Parser) perl(Pod::Abstract::Path) perl(Pod::Abstract::Serial) perl(Pod::Abstract::Tree) perl(Pod::Parser) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(UNIVERSAL) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Your given SPEC URL and spec in SRPM is not matching. You can even change permissions in %prep chmod 644 lib/Pod/Abstract/Filter/*.pm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080454.n584sVG4015661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 00:54:31 EDT --- Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-TraitsGUI Short Description: Traits-capable windowing framework Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080456.n584uPho021590@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:59:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:59:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080459.n584xd5D016496@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 00:59:39 EDT --- will review shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 04:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080458.n584wnjr016346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 00:58:48 EDT --- will review shortly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080524.n585O0C7026020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 01:24:00 EDT --- php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080524.n585OcZQ026093@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 01:24:37 EDT --- php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:23:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:23:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080523.n585NdUZ020872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 01:23:38 EDT --- php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-markdown-1.0.1m-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080527.n585R3G9021525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 01:27:02 EDT --- python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:29:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080529.n585T64Q026832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 --- Comment #9 from Ian Weller 2009-06-08 01:29:04 EDT --- Ping -- can we close this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080529.n585TBf3026865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 01:29:10 EDT --- python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:28:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:28:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080528.n585SEo0026783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 01:28:14 EDT --- python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502352] Review Request: php-markdown - Markdown implementation in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080530.n585UHhs027377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502352 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481738] Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080536.n585aK9N028287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080536.n585aMRk028336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481738, which changed state. Bug 481738 Summary: Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 05:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080536.n585aMvb028316@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Bug 481759 depends on bug 481738, which changed state. Bug 481738 Summary: Review Request: python-EnthoughtBase - Core package for the Enthought Tool Suite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481738 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 07:50:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 03:50:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080750.n587o4R3017428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #14 from Levente Farkas 2009-06-08 03:50:02 EDT --- sorry i was a serious accident 2 weeks ago and was at the intensive care for too weeks yesterday i can come home. i've to be in my bad for another 6 weeks. may be in a few weeks i'll be do something useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 08:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 04:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080842.n588g4pF031054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #9 from Yang Yong 2009-06-08 04:42:02 EDT --- overholt, below is the new SPEC/SRPM/POM URLs, have fixed the warnings of "wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding" and "mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs", please review again, thanks. SPEC URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath.spec SRPM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath-1.0-1.4.fc12.src.rpm POM URL: http://yyang.fedorapeople.org/saxpath/saxpath-1.0.pom -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:12:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:12:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080912.n589CQ4c011852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 05:12:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > BuildRequires: healpix-c++ > > BuildRequires: cfitsio > > is redundant (these are pulled in by the -devel packages). > > I meant: > > Requires: healpix-c++ > Requires: cfitsio > > so I believe this is now fixed. Nope, that is in collision with http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires Also, you really should increment the release tag every time you make a new revision. Not incrementing it makes it harder for me to keep track of what has been done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:17:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080917.n589HF1H007475@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 05:17:14 EDT --- Also, the package does not build in mock. You need at least BR: numpy, maybe you need also the other python packages as BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080915.n589FxIx012975@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 05:15:57 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398754 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479876] Review Request: yabasic - Small basic interpreter with simple graphics and printing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080926.n589QGZ7010190@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479876 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Depends on| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-08 05:26:15 EDT --- Sorry, I was a bit short on time in the past weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080931.n589VeS5017376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 05:31:39 EDT --- Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-EnvisageCore Short Description: Extensible Application Framework Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080938.n589cIsD019281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |medium Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury 2009-06-08 05:38:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gnusim8085 Short Description: A graphical simulator for Intel 8085 microprocessor Owners: sherry151 chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:52:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:52:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080952.n589qiO9017112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-08 05:52:43 EDT --- It seems that upstream made some changes. Time for an update. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 09:49:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 05:49:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906080949.n589niWW016159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #4 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-08 05:49:42 EDT --- I'm (and was) a bit short on time. Several stuff needs to be patched. There are a lot of patches, see Debian patch tracking system [1], and these patches needs to be integrated. [1] http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/navit/0.1.1.~svn2246-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081050.n58AoFHP032339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 06:50:15 EDT --- dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081049.n58AnPBL031869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 06:49:24 EDT --- dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:50:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:50:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081050.n58AoUuf005192@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 06:50:29 EDT --- dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dvtm-0.5.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:51:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:51:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081051.n58Ap0Sm005281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #19 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-08 06:50:57 EDT --- Using macros for commands, which are supposed to be located in $PATH, doesn't add any value. For example, a "configure" script would fail, if it searched for "cp" in $PATH, but an RPM build environment redefined %__cp to something outside $PATH. Same applies to lots of other tools. Their macro values expand to absolute path, but none of these paths are passed to the configure scripts, make, or other build frameworks. Even with major redefinition of macro values, you could not fully customise the rpmbuild without modifying the spec/src.rpm. Often, macro usage adds further inconsistencies even directly in the spec files: > %{__rm} -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} \; Once %{__rm}, below plain "rm". "find" is macro-less. /sbin/ldconfig in the scriptlets is macro-less, too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081049.n58AnpxB004801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #3 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-08 06:49:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > I've reviewed the package and it looks ok. There are only some minor and > uncritical issues: Thanks for the review, Christian. Good work. > * rpmlint: TODO > rpmlint SPECS/libxdg-basedir.spec SRPMS/libxdg-basedir-1.0.0-1.fc10.src.rpm > RPMS/i386/libxdg-basedir-* > libxdg-basedir.i386: W: no-documentation > libxdg-basedir-devel.i386: W: no-documentation > 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > In general it is not a problem to have no documentation if > a package doesn't provide any. ;-) However, in this specific case > the package provides a doxygen API documentation (make doxygen-all). > It would be good if it could be added to the devel package. Now we have -docs sub-package with Doxygen generated documentation. > * naming: OK > - name matches upstream > - spec file name matches package name > > * sources: TODO > - e32bcfa772fb57e8e1acdf9616a8d567 libxdg-basedir-1.0.0.tar.gz > - sources matches upstream > - Source0 tag ok > - spectool -g works > - upstream version 1.0.1 was released a couple of weeks ago, please update to > the new version (according to upstream's git repo it looks like a minor > bug fix release) Packed. > * License: TODO > - License MIT acceptable > - License in spec file matches the actual license (MIT license header in > libxdg-basedir-1.0.0/src/basedir.c ) > - No License file included, so there is no need to package it. > - It would be better if upstream would provide a license file. According to the > Review guidelines the packager is encouraged to query upstream to include it. > However this will not block the review. Encouraged :). You're in Cc. > * spec file written in English and legible: OK > > * compilation: OK > - supports parallel build > - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are correctly used > - builds in mock (F10) > - builds in koji: > F10: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394643 > F11: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1394648 > F12: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1397616 > > * BuildRequires: OK > - no build requires are necessary > > * locales handling: OK (n/a) > > * ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK > > * package owns all directories that it creates: TODO > - %{_libdkir}/pkgconfig is created, but not owned by libxdg-basedir-devel > - please add a "Requires: pkgconfig" to the devel package Added. > * no files listed twice in %files: OK > > * file permissions: OK > - %defattr used > - actual permissions in packages ok > > * %clean section: OK > > * macro usage: OK > > * code vs. content: OK (only code) > > * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) > > * header files in -devel subpackage: OK > > * static libraries in -static package: OK (n/a) > > * package containing *.pc files must "Requires: pkgconfig": TODO (see above) > > * *.so link in -devel package: OK > > * - devel package requires base package using fully versioned dependency: OK > > * packages must not contain *.la files: OK > > * GUI applications must provide *.desktop file: OK (n/a) > > * packages must not own files/dirs already owned by other packages: OK > > * rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install: OK > > * all filenames UTF-8: OK > > * functional test: OK > - compiling the provided test applications > tests/testfind and tests/testdump > - test apps compile successfully and the reported directory names seem to be > meaningful Added to %make check. > * debuginfo sub-package: OK > - non-empty > - debuginfo file works together with gdb -- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:56:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:56:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081056.n58AuVKg001178@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #15 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-08 06:56:29 EDT --- Thanks for the heads up. Take your time to get well first. We'll continue with the review whenever you're well enough, even if that takes a couple of weeks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 10:54:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 06:54:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499993] Review Request: dvtm - Tiling window management for the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081054.n58AskGt000614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499993 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:19:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:19:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081119.n58BJYsb011461@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 07:19:33 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1398881 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bca0c184cc3021e25b90320f53c19af3e7f4e5b2 EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1: you should use %global over %define APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081125.n58BPph5008143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-08 07:25:50 EDT --- Thanks, New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-EnvisagePlugins Short Description: Plug-ins for the Envisage framework Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486804] Review Request: libferrisloki - customized build of Loki library from Modern C++ Design for libferris In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081125.n58BPhjI013357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486804 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-08 07:25:40 EDT --- * Currently doesn't even build, because the %files section is unmaintained: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/include/FerrisLoki/Extensions.cpp /usr/include/FerrisLoki/OrderedStatic.cpp /usr/include/FerrisLoki/SafeFormat.cpp /usr/include/FerrisLoki/Singleton.cpp /usr/include/FerrisLoki/SmallObj.cpp /usr/include/FerrisLoki/SmartPtr.cpp /usr/include/FerrisLoki/StrongPtr.cpp /usr/lib/libferrisloki.a /usr/lib/libferrisloki.la * It would be extremely helpful (not just during review) if you maintained the spec %changelog and increased the "Release" value with every update of your package. It's something you would need to do for future updates anyway, so early practice would be beneficial. The latest package (from April 13th) is still ferrisloki-3.0.2-50021.src.rpm with only two changelog entries from 2001 and 2004. What exactly does the 50021 release value mean? * Fedora's optflags are used, but duplicated, and an appended -O3 -DNDEBUG overrides them. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2 * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081139.n58BdwvD011513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 07:39:57 EDT --- flickcurl-1.10-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickcurl-1.10-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:39:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:39:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081139.n58BdK54011433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 07:39:19 EDT --- flickcurl-1.10-3.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickcurl-1.10-3.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:40:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:40:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081140.n58BeUQ5012021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 07:40:29 EDT --- flickcurl-1.10-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickcurl-1.10-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:41:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:41:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081141.n58BfDWi012113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:41:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Please check if Rakefile or install.rb are needed for binary rpm. See below. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > $ gem contents term-ansicolor > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > expects that examples/ directory should be under %geminstdir. > While we allow (don't forbid) to delete some files listed in > "$ gem contents ") if packagers think they are not needed, > I don't think moving examples/ directory under %gemdir/doc is > needed. I adjusted all the packages to contain all the files "gem contents" list (reverted the deletes). I feel that it should always be consistent with the actual contents and don't think it's worth patching the lists for any of the files I used to remove. SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-term-ansicolor.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-term-ansicolor-1.0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081142.n58BgRZl017426@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58Biojn017911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:49 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-newgem.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-newgem-1.4.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499336] Review Request: flickcurl - C library for the Flickr API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081142.n58BgD58017373@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499336 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BikY6017889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:45 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-diff-lcs.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-diff-lcs-1.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BiuAI012732@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:55 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-shotgun.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-shotgun-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58Biqev012709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:51 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rack-test.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-test-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:45:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:45:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081145.n58Bj0f2012760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:58 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-syntax.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-syntax-1.0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BijSB012658@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:44 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-cucumber.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-cucumber-0.3.10-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BilU3012680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:46 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-launchy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-launchy-0.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58Bih6F012613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:42 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-builder.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-builder-2.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BiiLE012633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:43 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-configuration.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-configuration-0.0.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081145.n58BjsVv013271@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Nils Philippsen 2009-06-08 07:45:51 EDT --- Approved. One remaining minor issue: - WARNING/CHECK: rpmlint on xiphos-3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm: xiphos.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 1, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. --> probably trailing spaces on the first line. Please fix that when/after importing into CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BiwoH018211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:57 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-sinatra.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-sinatra-0.9.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:45:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:45:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081145.n58Bj2D3018521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:45:01 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-treetop.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-treetop-1.2.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58Bit5X018086@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:54 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rubigen.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rubigen-1.5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:44:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:44:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081144.n58BippC017952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 07:44:50 EDT --- Attempted to incorporate comments from here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469#c1 SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-polyglot.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-polyglot-0.2.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:52:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:52:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081152.n58BqRSH019954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #20 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 07:52:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Using macros for commands, which are supposed to be located in $PATH, doesn't > add any value. Yeah, but using them is not forbidden. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 11:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 07:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081152.n58BqxL0020036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mschwendt at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-08 07:52:57 EDT --- APPROVED [...] Some observations, though: * Version 1.0 of tslib uses version 0.0 in its SONAME and in the pkg-config file (libts-0.0.pc). Especially the latter is a questionable decision, because the pkg-config file doesn't do anything special and only returns the non-versioned -lts via --libs. There's no reason why upstream could not have named the file "libts.pc" then. Pkg-config can evaluate the internal "Version" field to requires specific versions or version-ranges. * The modules/plugins pollute the automatic RPM Provides (and hence the metadata) with their *.so names: $ rpm -qp --provides tslib-1.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm|grep -e so[^.] arctic2.so collie.so corgi.so dejitter.so h3600.so input.so linear.so linear_h2200.so mk712.so pthres.so ucb1x00.so variance.so Harmless, since nothing ought to depend on such symbols, but it's pollution nevertheless. * Asking upstream to run autogen.sh prior to creating the source tarball would be helpful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 12:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483434] Review Request: argtable2 - A library for parsing GNU style command line arguments In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081200.n58C03uZ016709@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483434 --- Comment #21 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-08 08:00:02 EDT --- Right, and I did not say they would be forbidden. I just replied to comment 13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 12:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081233.n58CXtln025351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 Deji Akingunola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Deji Akingunola 2009-06-08 08:33:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Approved. Thanks Nils. I've fixed the trailing spaces issues. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xiphos Short Description: Bible study and research tool Owners: deji Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 12:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081245.n58Cj4Pw032630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #28 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-08 08:45:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > Conrad, if you are still confronting with unstripped-binary-or-object > rpmlint warning, would you check if you have "redhat-rpm-config" > surely installed? Installing "redhat-rpm-config" appears to have fixed the problem -- many thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 12:55:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 08:55:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081255.n58Ct7GG003781@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla 2009-06-08 08:55:06 EDT --- Thanks! Builds are failing as it's still blocked. Rel-eng ticket: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1917 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 13:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081333.n58DX48C011969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #29 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-08 09:33:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > %doc README.txt LICENSE.txt > should only be placed once and preferably on the %{name}/main package. It is > not important that all -devel should entail documentation. I've redone the spec file -- rpmlint now gives no warnings and no errors. http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-4.fc10.src.rpm The -devel package needs to contain all the original text files and documentation, as they are referred to in the upstream README.txt file. The documentation is included here rather than the main package, as it is only required when developing programs that use the library. The main package contains the library and LICENSE.txt (+ associated license subdir). It didn't make sense to include README.txt in the main package, as it refers to files that are only present in the -devel package. I believe the package is now ready for inclusion into Fedora -- many thanks to everyone for their help. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 13:38:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:38:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081338.n58DcrP5013723@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-08 09:38:52 EDT --- Thank you. Fixed: http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Pod-Abstract.spec http://mmaslano.fedorapeople.org/review/perl-Pod-Abstract-0.17-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 13:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 09:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081356.n58DuDdi023556@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-08 09:56:11 EDT --- Ok, now that the lawsuit is settled, I'm going to review this. Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485401] Review Request: KyaPanel - Servers Manager The easy way to admin Postfix and Samba Servers. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081401.n58E1oD1025586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485401 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr --- Comment #1 from Pierre-YvesChibon 2009-06-08 10:01:49 EDT --- soon ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081400.n58E0WHm024953@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com, | |fedora-i18n-bugs at redhat.com Flag|needinfo?(nicolas.mailhot at l | |aposte.net) | --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-08 10:00:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Can you please check whether it will work or not? 1. Unless saab is derived from lohit punjabi and they have the same look and metrics I'd really not include Lohit Punjabi Saab 2. The 90 priority is safe, but very conservative. I'd discuss with the Lohit people and i18n if Saab could not be bumped a little. 3. Please cc the fonts list on fonts review so the right people get cc-ed 4. Please also check you didn't miss any step in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081414.n58EEBSK030837@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #30 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 10:14:10 EDT --- You still shouldn't duplicate LICENSE.txt and licenses in the -devel package, as they are already in the main package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081421.n58ELfvu028325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #31 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-08 10:21:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > You still shouldn't duplicate LICENSE.txt and licenses in the -devel package, > as they are already in the main package. Not including LICENSE.txt in -devel will break the references/links from README.txt and "index.html" (present in the upstream .tar.gz). Including README.txt only makes sense in the -devel package. Not including LICENSE.txt in the main package will cause rpmlint to give warnings. Suggestions ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503662] Review Request: saab-fonts - OTF Saab Punjabi Font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081424.n58EOSUb002240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503662 --- Comment #10 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 10:24:27 EDT --- thanks Nicolas for your reply. I will check what you have asked above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081430.n58EUDuw032148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #32 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 10:30:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > You still shouldn't duplicate LICENSE.txt and licenses in the -devel package, > > as they are already in the main package. > > Not including LICENSE.txt in -devel will break the references/links from > README.txt and "index.html" (present in the upstream .tar.gz). Including > README.txt only makes sense in the -devel package. In this case duplication may be alright, another option is to sed the link to point to %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081436.n58Ea51a002205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #5 from leigh scott 2009-06-08 10:36:03 EDT --- OK, here's my latest attempt :-) Spec URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/compiz-fusion-unsupported/1/compiz-fusion-unsupported.spec SRPM URL: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/compiz-fusion-unsupported/1/compiz-fusion-unsupported-0.8.2-1.fc12.src.rpm The x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc error is also present in the packages 1. compiz-fusion 2. compiz-fusion-extras Do I need to fix this ? rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Desktop/compiz-fusion-unsupported-0.8.2-1.fc12.src.rpm' compiz-fusion-unsupported.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Desktop/compiz-fusion-unsupported-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm' compiz-fusion-unsupported.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Desktop/compiz-fusion-unsupported-debuginfo-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm' compiz-fusion-unsupported-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Desktop/compiz-fusion-unsupported-devel-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm' compiz-fusion-unsupported-devel.x86_64: I: checking compiz-fusion-unsupported-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint -vi '/home/leigh/Desktop/compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome-0.8.2-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm' compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: I: checking compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-elements.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-atlantis.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-snow.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-tile.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-cubemodel.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-mswitch.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/gconf/schemas/compiz-fakeargb.schemas A configuration file is stored in your package without the noreplace flag. A way to resolve this is to put the following in your SPEC file: %config(noreplace) /etc/your_config_file_here compiz-fusion-unsupported-gnome.x86_64: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081451.n58EpkKu007145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 14:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081450.n58EoVNn011783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-08 10:50:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc error is also present in the packages > > 1. compiz-fusion > 2. compiz-fusion-extras and _a_lot_ more... > Do I need to fix this ? No, GConf schemas are not supposed to be edited by users and are not treated as config files. The warning is save to ignore, you can even remove %config. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081501.n58F112F014791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476359] Review Request: compiz-fusion-unsupported - Additional Compiz Fusion plugins for Compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081502.n58F2itq015242@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476359 --- Comment #7 from leigh scott 2009-06-08 11:02:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > > The x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc error is also present in the packages > > > > 1. compiz-fusion > > 2. compiz-fusion-extras > > and _a_lot_ more... > > > Do I need to fix this ? > > No, GConf schemas are not supposed to be edited by users and are not treated as > config files. The warning is save to ignore, you can even remove %config. Thanks. I have removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR as I'm already sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:14:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:14:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081514.n58FEPuB016352@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081523.n58FNO2Q019348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #24 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-08 11:23:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:50:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:50:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081550.n58FoGFL030177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-08 11:50:15 EDT --- Well, - Now build.log complains: ------------------------------------------------------------- 68 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/CHANGES 69 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/GPL 70 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/README.en 71 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/VERSION -------------------------------------------------------------- And as you did so before %geminstdir/examples should be marked as %doc. So %files should be: -------------------------------------------------------------- %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %dir %{geminstdir} %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* %doc %{geminstdir}/examples/ %{geminstdir}/*.rb %{geminstdir}/lib/ %doc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/ %{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem %{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec --------------------------------------------------------------- thoughts? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081557.n58Fv6Ow032236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #6 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-08 11:57:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Well, > - Now build.log complains: > ------------------------------------------------------------- > 68 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/CHANGES > 69 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/GPL > 70 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/README.en > 71 warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/term-ansicolor-1.0.3/VERSION > -------------------------------------------------------------- I am aware of this and believe that it is ok. Makes no real harm and saves me from enumerating the contents of the directory just to avoid duplicate listings. > And as you did so before %geminstdir/examples should be marked as > %doc. Will fix (for other packages as well). > So %files should be: > -------------------------------------------------------------- > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > > %dir %{geminstdir} > %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* > %doc %{geminstdir}/examples/ > %{geminstdir}/*.rb > %{geminstdir}/lib/ > > %doc %{gemdir}/doc/%{gemname}-%{version}/ > %{gemdir}/cache/%{gemname}-%{version}.gem > %{gemdir}/specifications/%{gemname}-%{version}.gemspec > --------------------------------------------------------------- > thoughts? I can do this (and for other packages as well) if you insist on eliminate of "listed twice" warning but I'll prefer not to. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 15:59:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 11:59:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504641] New: Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641 Summary: Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ruben at rubenkerkhof.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/sendxmpp.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/sendxmpp-0.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A perl script to send xmpp messages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081618.n58GIw5T007541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:18:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081619.n58GJp9R007724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:19:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081620.n58GKpd0008425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:20:49 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081623.n58GNfll007619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:23:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081627.n58GRx3M010784@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:27:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081627.n58GREqh010628@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:27:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081632.n58GWksW010274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:32:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:28:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:28:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504544] Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081628.n58GSemi009225@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504544 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:28:39 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081629.n58GTLo5009376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:29:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081629.n58GTwr6011518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:29:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081633.n58GXM3f012407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:33:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484798] Review Request: xiphos - Bible study and research tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081642.n58GgNVD012591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484798 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:42:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:43:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:43:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081643.n58GhXm2014930@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-08 12:43:31 EDT --- Just setting the fedora-cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081641.n58GfGSC014586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-08 12:41:15 EDT --- Well, I suggest to remove duplicate %files entry as - Actually it is MUST ;) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines#cite_ref-12 - And I am not sure if in this case rpmbuild marks these duplicated files as %doc or normal files. I actually checked the rebuilt binary rpm and it seems that %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* are marked as %doc, however I don't know any references. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081648.n58GmAWS014066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #33 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-08 12:48:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #32) > In this case duplication may be alright, another option is to sed the link to > point to %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt. We have two possible solutions: (1) keep the spec file as is (2) remove "LICENSE.txt" and "licenses" from -devel and add the following lines to the spec file: %post devel /sbin/ldconfig ln -s %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version}/LICENSE.txt ln -s %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/licenses %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version}/licenses %preun devel rm %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version}/LICENSE.txt rm -r %{_docdir}/%{name}-devel-%{version}/licenses Solution (2) saves about 43 Kb in disk space, but it's messier (post-install and pre-uninstall scriptlets). I'd vote for solution (1) as it's cleaner, but I'm also happy to go with (2) if that's what people prefer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 16:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 12:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081656.n58GuP1F016189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #34 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 12:56:24 EDT --- You can also just create the symlinks in the install phase, which is a lot neater than creating them in %post: %install ... mkdir symlink ln -s %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt symlink/ ln -s %{_datadir}/doc/%{name}-%{version}/licenses symlink/ %files devel %doc symlink/* -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 17:03:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:03:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081703.n58H3Gm6017879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #35 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-08 13:03:14 EDT --- rm -rf symlink ; mkdir symlink as not removing an existing symlink directory would break --short-circuit builds (and especially rpmbuild -bi --short-circuit foo.spec is very helpful). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 17:24:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:24:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081724.n58HOqIP025803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #36 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-08 13:24:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > You can also just create the symlinks in the install phase, > which is a lot neater than creating them in %post: > ... (In reply to comment #35) > rm -rf symlink ; mkdir symlink ok, spec file updated with the cleaner solution. http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-5.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint now gives two warnings, but they're just a harmless byproduct: armadillo-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/armadillo-devel-0.6.11/licenses /usr/share/doc/armadillo-0.6.11/licenses armadillo-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/armadillo-devel-0.6.11/LICENSE.txt /usr/share/doc/armadillo-0.6.11/LICENSE.txt (just to make it clear to anyone puzzled: as the -devel package is dependant on the main package, the symlinks will always work). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 17:46:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 13:46:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504283] Review Request: AGReader - Console reader for viewing AmigaGuide files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081746.n58HkLCs032474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504283 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla 2009-06-08 13:46:20 EDT --- Built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:14:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081814.n58IE5QZ006929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #2 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-06-08 14:14:03 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard-4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm (In reply to comment #1) > ! Please explain in the specfile as comments what Sources 1-3 are for. Done. > ! Not a blocker, but in the docs/ and examples/ directories, there are html, > xml and pro files that refer to /usr/local/. You might want to fix them. I've included a README.dist now. > ? Any reason why you don't put the jar files directly in /usr/share/java/ ? Yes, Packaging:Java says something about this: """ 1. If the number of provided JAR files exceeds two, you must place them into a sub-directory. """ Maybe I misread/misunderstood? > * If a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a > properly installed .desktop file. Done. The problem now is that I can't find a suitable icon for ProGuard anywhere. For now I use the "java" icon. > ! You need to specify a specific java version in BR and R. See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires > In your case this ought to be 1.5 This doesn't seem mandatory the way I read this? Also it is not mentioned in the "ant" template I used to create this spec file. Furthermore, I tried to compile it with "-source 1.4" and that also works? > * GCJ AOT bits SHOULD be built and included in packages. Since this package > builds with java 1.5, this will bring great performance improvements on ppc* > architectures. Please follow: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines I did this now. However, rpmbuild gives some warnings now: + /usr/bin/aot-compile-rpm /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/aotcompile.py:18: DeprecationWarning: the md5 module is deprecated; use hashlib instead import md5 aot-compile-rpm: warning: subsetted /home/fkooman/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/proguard-4.3-2.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/java/proguard/proguardgui.jar aot-compile-rpm: warning: subsetted /home/fkooman/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/proguard-4.3-2.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/java/proguard/retrace.jar WARNING: Error loading security provider org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider not found in gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:./], parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}} WARNING: Error loading security provider org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider not found in gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:./], parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}} rpmlint is also not totally happy: [fkooman at localhost x86_64]$ rpmlint proguard-4.3-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm proguard.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/gcj/proguard/proguard.jar.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fkooman at localhost x86_64]$ and the one that is due to GCJ (which can be ignored): proguard.spec:118: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} > Can you review my package (bug #504521 )? It is java too. It seems someone is already interested in reviewing it. I added myself to the CC of the bug anyway and look through it soon. Thanks for your review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081837.n58IbKux011387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |503598 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503598] Review Request: sphinxbase - Common library for CMU Sphinx voice recognition products In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081837.n58IbKv4011409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503598 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504671 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:36:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:36:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504671] New: Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504671 Summary: Review Request: pocketsphinx - Speech recognition for handheld and embedded devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/pocketsphinx/pocketsphinx-0.5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: PocketSphinx is a version of the open-source Sphinx-II speech recognition system which runs on handheld and embedded devices. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081859.n58Ixl2s020265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 14:59:46 EDT --- ping David -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081856.n58IufhB019942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 14:56:38 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:01:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:01:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081901.n58J1BLN019538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 15:01:10 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 18:59:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:59:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081859.n58IxXxV018851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 14:59:32 EDT --- ping David -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081900.n58J0DWY020854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 15:00:12 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500003] Review Request: textroom - A full screen rich text editor for writers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081900.n58J0SmB020904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500003 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 15:00:27 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489598] Review Request: codelite - a powerful open-source, cross platform code editor for C/C++ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081903.n58J3dHV021399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489598 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 15:03:38 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081903.n58J3u5a020504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 --- Comment #4 from Byron Clark 2009-06-08 15:03:55 EDT --- I made the requested changes. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/lazygal.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/lazygal-0.4.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081905.n58J5Wje021076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 15:05:29 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:16:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:16:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081916.n58JGVjd023322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 --- Comment #6 from Jon Masters 2009-06-08 15:16:30 EDT --- Oh, I don't seem to be assigned to this properly, but anyway, ok, I'll look. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:17:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:17:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081917.n58JH09u024890@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 Jon Masters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jussi.lehtola at iki.fi |jcm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081918.n58JIqPc023808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-08 15:18:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard.spec > SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard-4.3-2.fc11.src.rpm > Thanks for the update! > (In reply to comment #1) > > ! Please explain in the specfile as comments what Sources 1-3 are for. > > Done. > Can you also use "cp -p" with them to preserve timestamps? > > ! Not a blocker, but in the docs/ and examples/ directories, there are html, > > xml and pro files that refer to /usr/local/. You might want to fix them. > > I've included a README.dist now. > > > ? Any reason why you don't put the jar files directly in /usr/share/java/ ? > > Yes, Packaging:Java says something about this: > """ 1. If the number of provided JAR files exceeds two, you must place them > into a sub-directory. """ > > Maybe I misread/misunderstood? Ah, right. Then can you (from comment #1) > replace > %{_javadir}/%{name}* > with > %{_javadir}/%{name}/ > in %files to indicate that this is a directory? > > > * If a package contains a GUI application, then it needs to also include a > > properly installed .desktop file. > > Done. The problem now is that I can't find a suitable icon for ProGuard > anywhere. For now I use the "java" icon. > That's fine. You could also derive something from the png files in the docs/ directory, or ask the upstream about this. Btw, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/*/apps/java.png files belong to java-1.6.0-openjdk, so if you use that icon, you need to require this version of java. > > ! You need to specify a specific java version in BR and R. See: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Java#BuildRequires_and_Requires > > In your case this ought to be 1.5 > > This doesn't seem mandatory the way I read this? Also it is not mentioned in > the "ant" template I used to create this spec file. Furthermore, I tried to > compile it with "-source 1.4" and that also works? > Well, it's good to have it to indicate what versions of java can be used with this software. > > * GCJ AOT bits SHOULD be built and included in packages. Since this package > > builds with java 1.5, this will bring great performance improvements on ppc* > > architectures. Please follow: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/GCJGuidelines > > I did this now. However, rpmbuild gives some warnings now: > > + /usr/bin/aot-compile-rpm > /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/aotcompile.py:18: DeprecationWarning: the md5 > module is deprecated; use hashlib instead > import md5 > aot-compile-rpm: warning: subsetted > /home/fkooman/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/proguard-4.3-2.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/java/proguard/proguardgui.jar > aot-compile-rpm: warning: subsetted > /home/fkooman/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/proguard-4.3-2.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/java/proguard/retrace.jar > > WARNING: Error loading security provider > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider: > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider not found in > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:./], > parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}} > WARNING: Error loading security provider > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider: > java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: > org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider not found in > gnu.gcj.runtime.SystemClassLoader{urls=[file:./], > parent=gnu.gcj.runtime.ExtensionClassLoader{urls=[], parent=null}} > > rpmlint is also not totally happy: > > [fkooman at localhost x86_64]$ rpmlint proguard-4.3-2.fc11.x86_64.rpm > proguard.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > /usr/lib64/gcj/proguard/proguard.jar.so > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. > [fkooman at localhost x86_64]$ > Hmm, I don't get these warnings. Koji rawhide build doesn't show them either http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1399792 Do you use mock? If not, do you have redhat-rpm-config installed? > and the one that is due to GCJ (which can be ignored): > > proguard.spec:118: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) > %attr(-,root,root) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} > Yes, this warning can be ignored (this is the only warning I got on my build). Btw, you can just remove the %attr(-,root,root) part. I've been pinging java folks about this and a few other things that need to be updated in the java packaging guidelines. Things go "a little" slow. > > Can you review my package (bug #504521 )? It is java too. > > It seems someone is already interested in reviewing it. I added myself to the > CC of the bug anyway and look through it soon. Thanks for your review! You're welcome! Yep. Rakesh took it :) It's okay. * Also, please use macros consistently. E.g. ${RPM_BUILD_ROOT} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT shouldn't be in the same specfile. Also, please either use %{name} all over the specfile or use proguard. Not a mixture of both! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081924.n58JOS52027503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Tracking --- Comment #7 from John Poelstra 2009-06-08 15:24:27 EDT --- Adding 'Tracking' keyword to be excluded from rawhide rebase to Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:20:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081920.n58JKRec025924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 John Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |john.e.anderson at gmail.com --- Comment #18 from John Anderson 2009-06-08 15:20:23 EDT --- I would be interested in having a look, does anyone still have the spec available? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081929.n58JTuXs027121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 15:29:55 EDT --- bastet-0.43-5.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bastet-0.43-5.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:32:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:32:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081932.n58JWGOJ030322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 Stefan Posdzich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 19:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 15:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226365] Merge Review: redhat-rpm-config In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906081949.n58Jno6c002498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226365 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-08 15:49:49 EDT --- Ugh, you're not supposed to change the assignment; Merge Reviews are like Package Reviews: the reviewer is the assignee, s/he makes critical notes about the package that are dealt with by the maintainer(s). Well, if getting this done requires you to get the assignment, that's OK with me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 20:34:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:34:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082034.n58KY7gv017585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #6 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-08 16:34:06 EDT --- Hi, I am attending the FudCon 09 in Berlin. Can I use my time there in way to help to this along. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 20:55:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 16:55:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499951] Review Request: netdiscover - A network address discovering/monitoring tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082055.n58KtrKH016424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499951 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Nussbaumer 2009-06-08 16:55:51 EDT --- Today, I received an answer from Jaime Pe?alba the author of netdiscover. He told me that the last changes in CVS have been made around 4 months ago. But he's still working on netdiscover and there's also a pending patch from a contributor. He plans to release a stable version 0.3 but there's no release date for it. Hope this information will help. Is there a chance to include netdiscover in the official Fedora repository? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 21:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082102.n58L2RsQ024147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #38 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-08 17:02:25 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346933) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346933) changes.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 21:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082110.n58LAOAk019650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #39 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-08 17:10:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Hey Mauricio, > > the upstream tarball build well in mock. What have you tried and whats your > system? Fedora 10 2.6.27.15-170.2.24.fc10.i686, rpm tools: rpm-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386 rpmrebuild-2.3-1.fc10.noarch rpm-devel-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386 rpm-build-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386 rpm-apidocs-4.6.0-1.fc10.i386 rpmdevtools-7.0-1.fc10.noarch rpm-libs-4.6.0-2.fc10.i386 (btw, the diff between your tarball and the official one shows no > changes at mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in) yeap, I try it again, I have to add version info (Version: 2.0) in mono.debugging.backend.mdb.pc.in file, due to that, I only attach you the .spec file, becouse I can't generate the src.rpm package: rpmbuild: rpmfc.c:407: rpmfcHelper: Assertion `EVR != ((void *)0)' failed. Aborted I find it as a bug in rpmbuild tools, can't find the link now, To generate the src.rpm package I need to modifie sources and since that package is not going to have original upstream source tarbal.... > s the version of > To version numbers: > Every version of your package needs an unique identifier. We use a > [project-version]-[package-release] form, where [project-version] is the > version of the upstream project and [package-release] the version of the > package (which starts from 1 for each new upstream version btw) > > The release number at the beginning of the spec-file should be the same as the > latest changelog entry. Because of this I said we should take three, because > there currently are 3 entries. We could replace them by one, then we would set > release number to 1 again. I would support that, maybe with a text like this: > * Thu Jun 04 2009 Mauricio Henriquez - 2.0-1 > - Initial packaging with help by Ryan Bair > > Hope this makes things clearer for you!? dummy me!! :-) , yeap sure, have prefect sense for me now, sorry :-S, think that this time is going to be ok.. > > Furthermore could we have a better package description? > I prefer not, that is the original upstream description that is showed in diferent places, don't want to put some mistake in there , and is quite clear to me actually.. > Thanks for your work! your wellcome.. > Paul Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 21:25:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:25:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082125.n58LPmcx022818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #40 from Paul Lange 2009-06-08 17:25:47 EDT --- Hey Mauricio, I don't need to add anything. Look at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400013 It builds well on i586 with the original tarball. We should remove x86_64 for now because of bug #490025 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490025 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 21:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:39:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082139.n58Ld75f025509@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #41 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-08 17:39:06 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=346937) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=346937) x86_64 removed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 21:40:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:40:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082140.n58LeYEc026130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #42 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-08 17:40:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #40) > Hey Mauricio, > > I don't need to add anything. Look at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400013 I believe you, glad it work, still same thing here, so I just attach the spec file > > It builds well on i586 with the original tarball. We should remove x86_64 for > now because of bug #490025 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490025 ok, removed.. > > Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 21:54:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 17:54:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504707] New: Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, jboggs at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-locale_rails.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-locale_rails-2.0.4-1.fc.src.rpm Description: This library provides some Rails localized functions. This is useful with Rails i18n backends which doesn't have auto-detection and some other features includes this library. koji scratch build: - for F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1399850 - for F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1399869 For rpmlint: ---------------------------------------------------------------- rubygem-locale_rails-doc.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/locale_rails-2.0.4/test/db/schema.rb rubygem-locale_rails-doc.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/locale_rails-2.0.4/test/public/favicon.ico rubygem-locale_rails-doc.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/locale_rails-2.0.4/sample/public/favicon.ico --------------------------------------------------------------- - For now I don't know if I can remove these file safely so I will keep these files for now. Note that currently this file is for F-11 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 22:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] New: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, jboggs at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord-2.0.4-1.fc.src.rpm Description: gettext_activerecord provides the localization for ActiveRecord-2.2 or later using Ruby-GetText-Package. * Validation messages translation * Model translation * extract messages from models with the rake task. koji scratch build: - For F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1399962 - For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1399956 Note that currently this packge is for F-11 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 22:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504707] Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082211.n58MBNEu031546@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504710 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 22:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082211.n58MBOkt031570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504710 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 22:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] New: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, jboggs at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 504707,504709 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_rails.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_rails-2.0.4-1.fc.src.rpm Description: gettext_rails provides the localization for Ruby on Rails-2.3 or later using Ruby-GetText-Package. * Autodetect client locale using locale/locale_rails. * Easy maintenance of translations to use powerful tools for gettext family. * Model translation using gettext_activerecord. * Localization for some helpers. * Works with other Rails I18n backend. * Note that gettext_rails is not the one of I18n backend. * Thread safe. (koji) scratch build - For F-12: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/Mock_results/ - For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400009 Note that currently this package is for F-11 and above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 22:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 18:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482763] Review Request: compat-guichan07 - compatibility libraries for guichan 0.7.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082234.n58MYLcV002900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482763 --- Comment #8 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-06-08 18:34:20 EDT --- You seem still need to follow the EOL procedure for devel branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 23:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082300.n58N0ZNR012868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #9 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-08 19:00:34 EDT --- Thanks for all your patience with this review. I have fixed the issues you mentioned and now the package builds in mock. The new files are again at: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 8 23:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 19:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906082346.n58Nkx9B015069@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-06-08 19:46:58 EDT --- Hi Michal, thanks for the fast reply. I believe we are very close to approval, just two minor items: (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > In general it is not a problem to have no documentation if > > a package doesn't provide any. ;-) However, in this specific case > > the package provides a doxygen API documentation (make doxygen-all). > > It would be good if it could be added to the devel package. > > Now we have -docs sub-package with Doxygen generated documentation. Ok, good! Only one small request: please can you rename the -docs package into -doc? I'm not 100% sure about this because I've found on my system packages with both naming conventions. However, the packaging guidelines only mention -doc: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation > > * License: TODO > > - License MIT acceptable > > - License in spec file matches the actual license (MIT license header in > > libxdg-basedir-1.0.0/src/basedir.c ) > > - No License file included, so there is no need to package it. > > - It would be better if upstream would provide a license file. According to the > > Review guidelines the packager is encouraged to query upstream to include it. > > However this will not block the review. > > Encouraged :). You're in Cc. Great - looks like Mark already added it. It is sufficient to include it in the package once upstream provides a new tarball. No further action needed right now. ;-) > > * sources: TODO > > - e32bcfa772fb57e8e1acdf9616a8d567 libxdg-basedir-1.0.0.tar.gz > > - sources matches upstream > > - Source0 tag ok > > - spectool -g works > > - upstream version 1.0.1 was released a couple of weeks ago, please update to > > the new version (according to upstream's git repo it looks like a minor > > bug fix release) > > Packed. Just for reference: the new source tarball matches upstream - md5sum: 941dacde04db15164c9aca5a1d856665 libxdg-basedir-1.0.1.tar.gz > > * package owns all directories that it creates: TODO > > - %{_libdkir}/pkgconfig is created, but not owned by libxdg-basedir-devel > > - please add a "Requires: pkgconfig" to the devel package > > Added. Sorry, probably there was a small misunderstanding here. Adding "Requires: pkgconfig" is sufficient since it will provide the ownership of %{_libdir}/pkgconfig. So it is not needed that libxdg-base-devel owns the pkgconfig directory itself (and other packages with *.pc files don't do it either... ;-) ). Best regards, Christian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 00:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 20:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090027.n590RH5D028703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 20:27:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Should > 1) Add following for subpackage sqlsh > %defattr(-,root,root,-) Done. Thanks! :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 01:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504524] Review Request: perl-SQL-Shell - Command interpreter for DBI shells In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090144.n591icYa012185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504524 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 21:44:37 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 01:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504456] Review Request: perl-MooseX-SemiAffordanceAccessor - Name your accessors foo() and set_foo() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090144.n591iYHg012149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504456 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 21:44:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 01:44:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:44:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504177] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault - Automatically set and update fields In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090144.n591iUWI012115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504177 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 21:44:29 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 01:44:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 21:44:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504544] Review Request: perl-Linux-Inotify2 - Scalable directory/file change notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090144.n591ig7x006094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504544 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-08 21:44:41 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 02:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090247.n592lh4m028812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 22:47:42 EDT --- mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 02:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090249.n592nSCk022962@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-08 22:49:27 EDT --- mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 03:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] New: Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 Summary: Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/File-ChangeNotify OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-File-ChangeNotify.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.06-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Watch for changes to files, easily, cleanly, and across different platforms. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400604 Additional Comment: This is a new BR of the latest GA Catalyst::Devel. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 03:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090336.n593aDsI008008@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-08 23:36:12 EDT --- Note that this package didn't build as reviewed... please do make sure to do scratch builds or mock builds of packages under review to make sure they build. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 03:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 23:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090349.n593nSdL004015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-08 23:49:27 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400604 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5ba72b2232d5e3a94ca37e0de636be3238441967 File-ChangeNotify-0.06.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=31, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.32 cusr 0.03 csys = 0.39 CPU) + Package perl-File-ChangeNotify-0.06-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(File::ChangeNotify) = 0.06 perl(File::ChangeNotify::Event) perl(File::ChangeNotify::Watcher) perl(File::ChangeNotify::Watcher::Default) perl(File::ChangeNotify::Watcher::Inotify) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Class::MOP) perl(File::Find) perl(File::Spec) perl(Linux::Inotify2) perl(Module::Pluggable::Object) perl(Moose) perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints) perl(MooseX::Params::Validate) perl(MooseX::SemiAffordanceAccessor) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090402.n59420Pq013693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:01:59 EDT --- python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090401.n5941Ifx013459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:01:16 EDT --- python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090402.n5942baf013880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:02:36 EDT --- python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-AppTools-3.1.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090403.n59436hq014130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:03:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:03:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090403.n59438BH014184@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481759, which changed state. Bug 481759 Summary: Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090403.n59437DI014161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Bug 481727 depends on bug 481759, which changed state. Bug 481759 Summary: Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:30:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:30:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090430.n594UWI9014188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-09 00:30:31 EDT --- Should we set fedora-review+ ? :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090449.n594nCxI024327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:49:11 EDT --- python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090448.n594m7RN024266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:48:06 EDT --- python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:49:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:49:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090449.n594nsIv017534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:49:54 EDT --- python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnvisageCore-3.0.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:54:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:54:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090454.n594sSYM025357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:54:28 EDT --- python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:51:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:51:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481727] Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090451.n594puni025011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090451.n594pi4L024967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #10 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-06-09 00:51:43 EDT --- #8 Became member of Packager group. #9 Added Requires:sdcc -- DONE! Take release 4: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/mcu8051ide.spec http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mcu8051ide-1.1-4.fc10.src.rpm Koji build is successful at: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400739 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090451.n594pwPK025060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481727, which changed state. Bug 481727 Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:51:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:51:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090451.n594pvu9025040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Bug 481734 depends on bug 481727, which changed state. Bug 481727 Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisageCore - Extensible Application Framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481727 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090453.n594rnPx018351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:53:48 EDT --- python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:55:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:55:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090455.n594tURr018871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 00:55:29 EDT --- python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090456.n594u95c019009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481701, which changed state. Bug 481701 Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481701] Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090456.n594u7WS018957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 04:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 00:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481759] Review Request: python-AppTools - Enthought Tool Suite Application Tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090456.n594u8VY018985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481759 Bug 481759 depends on bug 481701, which changed state. Bug 481701 Summary: Review Request: python-TraitsGUI - Traits-capable windowing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481701 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:06:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:06:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090506.n59563D5021192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-09 01:06:02 EDT --- oops I set fedora-review? Thanks for reminding me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:08:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090508.n5958fMh028506@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:08:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:08:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090508.n5958dlT028478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-09 01:08:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-File-ChangeNotify Short Description: Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090524.n595O9qM031305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 01:24:08 EDT --- python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:26:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:26:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090526.n595QAxA024814@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 01:26:09 EDT --- python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:25:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:25:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090525.n595PHK4031752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-09 01:25:16 EDT --- python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-EnvisagePlugins-3.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481734] Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090526.n595Qocb032058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: python-Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090526.n595QodZ032082@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Bug 482216 depends on bug 481734, which changed state. Bug 481734 Summary: Review Request: python-EnvisagePlugins - Plug-ins for the Envisage framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481734 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:28:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:28:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090528.n595S3jp025136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: Mayavi - |python-Mayavi - The Mayavi |The Mayavi scientific data |scientific data |3-dimensional visualizer |3-dimensional visualizer | --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-09 01:28:03 EDT --- All dependencies are imported and will be in updates-testing in some time .. till then I will repackage it as Mayavi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 05:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 01:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090548.n595mlXt003815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-09 01:48:46 EDT --- Well, this should be Release 4, since: -1 was initial release -2 was build against healpix-c++ and cfitsio instead of the bundled ones -3 was removing bundled healpix and cfitsio altogether and changing duplicated BR:s into R:s -4 dropping the extra R:s ** - You should probably %build export CFLAGS="%{optflags} -fopenmp" to enable threading support. - g++ flags are not used. This needs to be fixed. - The package *does not contain any license statement at all*. It cannot go in until you get upstream to put the license in the tarball, the order of preference is 1. source code headers stating the file(s) are under GPLv2+ 2. COPYING stating healpy is under GPLv2+ 3. plain GPLv(N) COPYING file, which means that code is under GPL+. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:12:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:12:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090612.n596Cwmu000894@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-09 02:12:57 EDT --- Ok. One last package to get in rawhide and I can update Catalyst::Devel to latest over there... Let me get those in and we can start with 5.8 as a baseline for this review. I've only taken a cursory look at the spec so far, but given that this came from the CPAN we may want to explicitly "provide: perl-MojoMojo = %{version}-%{release}". I'm also bringing HTML::Entities (perl-HTML-Parser) up to 3.60; this should allow for the versioned depends. The cpan.org url is the canonical url: for packages from the CPAN, but given that http://mojomojo.org exists perhaps we should use it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:16:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:16:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) scrip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090616.n596GxTT009108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504744] Review Request: python-yams - An Entity Relationship Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090629.n596T2ML011450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504744 Ramakrishna Reddy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:27:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:27:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504744] New: Review Request: python-yams - An Entity Relationship Schema Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-yams - An Entity Relationship Schema https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504744 Summary: Review Request: python-yams - An Entity Relationship Schema Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ramkrsna at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-yams.spec SRPM URL: http://ramakrishnareddy.info/fedora/python-yams-0.23.0-0.fc11.src.rpm Description: Yet Another Magic Schema! A simple generic but powerful entities relations schema, suitable to represent RDF like data. The schema is readable, writeable from and to various formats. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:31:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504744] Review Request: python-yams - An Entity Relationship Schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090631.n596VGIA012134@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504744 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090646.n596kAZH008279@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 458430] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090645.n596juY2008223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 --- Comment #13 from Parag 2009-06-09 02:45:53 EDT --- Closing now as said earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 06:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 02:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456582] Review Request: tex-fontools - Tools for handling fonts with LaTeX and fontinst In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090646.n596kDWJ008340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456582 Bug 456582 depends on bug 458430, which changed state. Bug 458430 Summary: Review Request: lcdf-typetools - Tools for manipulating OpenType and PostScript fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458430 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:03:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:03:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090703.n5973C3o018778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |senamirmir-washra-fonts - |senamirmir-washra-fonts - |Fonts for the Ge?ez |Fonts for the Ge?ez |(Ethiopic) scrip |(Ethiopic) script -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] New: Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files Alias: perl-Text-PDF https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-PDF OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Text-PDF.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Text-PDF-0.29a-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows interaction with existing PDF files directly. It includes various tools: pdfbklt - make booklets out of existing PDF files pdfrevert - remove edits from a PDF file pdfstamp - stamp text on each page of a PDF file Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400986 *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090710.n597A7r3013677@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-09 03:10:06 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090711.n597B1M9020153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090718.n597IQGE021874@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #11 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-09 03:18:25 EDT --- > - The package *does not contain any license statement at all*. It cannot go in > until you get upstream to put the license in the tarball, the order of > preference is I have contacted upstream. I will let you know when the License has been properly included. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:28:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090728.n597SurN024248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 03:28:55 EDT --- OK Rpmlint must be run on every package. OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. 2fdf4c3170e53a083715888237914a9b OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090731.n597VOYK018636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:31:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090731.n597VNRe018611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-09 03:31:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Text-PDF Short Description: Module for manipulating PDF files Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:29:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:29:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090729.n597TEVj018028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 03:29:13 EDT --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090735.n597ZxXE019527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504746(perl-Text-PDF) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090735.n597ZwTi019505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504748(perl-PDF-Reuse) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] New: Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents Alias: perl-PDF-Reuse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDF-Reuse OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-PDF-Reuse.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-PDF-Reuse-0.35-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This module allows you to reuse PDF-files. You can use pages, images, fonts and Acrobat JavaScript from old PDF-files (if they were not encrypted), and rearrange the components, and add new graphics, texts etc. There is also support for graphics. In the tutorial there is a description of how to transform simple PDF-pages to graphic Perl objects with the help of programs based on this module. The module is fairly fast, so it should be possible to use it for mass production. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:45:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:45:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] New: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Summary: Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse-0.03-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Catalyst::View::PDF::Reuse provides the facility to generate PDF files from a Catalyst application by embedding PDF::Reuse commands within a Template::Toolkit template. Within your template you will have access to a 'pdf' object which has methods corresponding to all of PDF::Reuse's functions. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504261] Review Request: mailody - Simple KDE-based IMAP mail client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090746.n597kxRL021641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504261 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mathys 2009-06-09 03:46:58 EDT --- Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mailody.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mailody-1.5.0-0.2.alfa1.fc11.src.rpm Terje: Thanks for the comments! Well, there's probably some Requires missing as of now since I really don't have an idea about them. But one should have been clear to me and I still missed it :/ kdepimlibs-akonadi now is on the Requires, I hope that fixes your problem. Yes, I forgot about the desktop file install...or the validation of the installed file to be precise. I already fixed that here, but didn't upload that version until now :) Note: the desktop file is correctly installed automatically, I only validate it. I also made the other changes you suggested. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:45:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:45:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090745.n597jrcl027611@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504749 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090745.n597jsQG027634@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504748(perl-PDF-Reuse) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:55:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:55:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090755.n597tTGM025201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 07:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 03:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090755.n597t0aG029708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #11 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-09 03:54:59 EDT --- - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as LICENSE - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 08:22:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:22:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090822.n598M7Zq032688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 08:21:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:21:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090821.n598LsJ2005060@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 08:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090850.n598oha3006776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 04:50:42 EDT --- ? Rpmlint must be run on every package. OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. ? The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. ff74342ce45fbb2115792b0d24d7ae8c OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). Remove rf from release, because it makes rpmlint scream. Also there is problem with license. I found the same as Perl itself in Cache.pm file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 08:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090851.n598pHdv011630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 04:51:16 EDT --- Build pass http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1401083 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 08:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090859.n598x4xV013222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 04:59:03 EDT --- Ooops, sorry. I've overlooked, it was already taken. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 08:57:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 04:57:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090857.n598vsu0013004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 04:57:53 EDT --- OK Rpmlint must be run on every package. OK The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license. OK The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file. OK The spec file must be written in American English. OK The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. 1e2541eacaf8df4f4012312f6c353688 OK The package MUST successfully compile. OK Correct BuildRequires. OK Proper use of %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. OK Shared library files (not just symlinks) must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK Relocatable package must state this fact in the request for review. OK A package must own all directories that it creates. OK A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK Permissions on files must be set properly. OK Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK Each package must consistently use macros. OK The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. OK Header files must be in a -devel package. OK Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK Library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1) and files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in -devel. OK In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package. OK Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives. OK Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:04:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090904.n59941H0014630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-09 05:03:59 EDT --- I am actually waiting for perl-Text-PDF to be built for rawhide so that I can continue with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:06:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:06:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090906.n5996nQG010515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #5 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-09 05:06:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) Hola, thanks for the review. Re: """ Ok, good! Only one small request: please can you rename the -docs package into -doc? I'm not 100% sure about this because I've found on my system packages with both naming conventions. However, the packaging guidelines only mention -doc: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation """ Correct. I misread the docs. Corrected. Re: """ Sorry, probably there was a small misunderstanding here. Adding "Requires: pkgconfig" is sufficient since it will provide the ownership of %{_libdir}/pkgconfig. So it is not needed that libxdg-base-devel owns the pkgconfig directory itself (and other packages with *.pc files don't do it either... ;-) ). """ Yep. Right. I should use brain next time. Both issues fixed: * Tue Jun 9 2009 Michal Nowak - 1.0.1-2 - removed bogus ownership of %%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ - "docs" sub-package renamed to "doc" http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090906.n5996VWj015518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #37 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-09 05:06:29 EDT --- Actually there is no need to include the licenses again in the sub -devel package. as I said in comment #26 Remove these rm -rf symlink; mkdir symlink ln -s %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/LICENSE.txt symlink/ ln -s %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/licenses symlink/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090918.n599I7Mg013753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #38 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-09 05:18:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > Actually there is no need to include the licenses > again in the sub -devel package. They need to be there, otherwise README.txt and index.html (from upstream archive) refer to stuff that isn't there (i.e. we'd have broken references/links). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090923.n599NmQt020657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-06-09 05:23:45 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: chntpw New Branches: EL-5 Owners: rjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:22:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:22:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090922.n599MMmX020231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 --- Comment #3 from Michael Fleming 2009-06-09 05:22:21 EDT --- Ah, this is what happens when I try and write a blog post and keep an eye on IRC / microblogs when making quick hacks to a .spec New Spec URL: http://mfleming.fedorapeople.org/perl-Cache-Memcached.spec SRPM URL: http://mfleming.fedorapeople.org/perl-Cache-Memcached-1.26-3.fc10.src.rpm [mfleming at defender mfleming]$ rpmlint /home/mfleming/rpmbuild/SRPMS/perl-Cache-Memcached-1.26-3.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [mfleming at defender mfleming]$ rpmlint perl-Cache-Memcached.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:29:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:29:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090929.n599TeX3017173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 09:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 05:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906090934.n599Y2Dp018389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #39 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-09 05:34:00 EDT --- Well, sometimes it's worth the little bit of extra effort and install all documentation files into a common %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ via %install instead of using %doc for subpackages. [The more subpackages include %doc files, the more docdirs get created. That doesn't help with keeping /usr/share/doc browsable. Some packages with multiple subpackages spread their %doc files over more than four different docdirs.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 10:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091009.n59A9Ji9027531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #40 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-09 06:09:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > Well, sometimes it's worth the little bit of extra effort > and install all documentation files into a common > %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ via %install instead > of using %doc for subpackages. I concur. Updated: http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-6.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint gives no warnings on the source and binary packages. (I hope this is the last iteration...) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 10:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091018.n59AITvV029771@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-09 06:18:28 EDT --- The spec file in srpm is all right. ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 10:23:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:23:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091023.n59ANRRj003946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #41 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-09 06:23:26 EDT --- Now you need to: - mark the documentation files as %doc and - add %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ to the files of the main package. (I don't think it owns the directory yet.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 10:46:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 06:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091046.n59AkYDF003974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 Michael Fleming changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Michael Fleming 2009-06-09 06:46:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Cache-Memcached Short Description: Perl client for memcached Owners: mfleming Branches: F10 F11 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 11:13:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:13:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091113.n59BDnri009869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #42 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-09 07:13:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > Now you need to: > > - mark the documentation files as %doc > > and > > - add > %dir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > to the files of the main package. (I don't think it owns the directory yet.) Agreed on "%dir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/" However, is %doc guaranteed to always place files into %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ? If not, this is going to conflict with the -devel package which lists the documentation as "%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README.txt ... " I can't use %doc for the -devel package, as it's going to create a separate directory. Michael Schwendt (Comment #39) suggested to avoid the use of %doc for the devel package in order to keep everything in one place. If we're using direct file specification instead of %doc in the devel package, why not also do this in the main package ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 11:31:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:31:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091131.n59BVLrl013958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-09 07:31:19 EDT --- All changes merged into F-11 and devel branches, so I think we may close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 11:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226515] Merge Review: unixODBC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091132.n59BW7FB019987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226515 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-09 07:32:03 EDT --- Koji scratch build http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1401209 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 11:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091142.n59BgfwB016439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #43 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-09 07:42:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #42) > Agreed on "%dir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/" > > However, is %doc guaranteed to always place files into > %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ ? > > If not, this is going to conflict with the -devel package which lists the > documentation as "%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/README.txt ... " Nope, it just tags the files as documentation in the RPM database, see: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html Normally one doesn't use this, but in this case you should. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 11:45:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 07:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091145.n59Bjv9X017534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #44 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-09 07:45:56 EDT --- %doc for absolute paths is just an attribute, whereas for local files it copies them into a subpkg's default docdir (after emptying that docdir). Your %files entries with %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} at the front are absolute paths. You can add the %doc attribute to them without problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 12:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091204.n59C4fOh021924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #45 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-09 08:04:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > Nope, it just tags the files as documentation in the RPM database, see: > http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-files-list-directives.html > > Normally one doesn't use this, but in this case you should. ok, done: http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-7.fc10.src.rpm 7th time lucky ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 12:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 08:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504151] Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091233.n59CX0fJ029167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504151 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 14:57:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:57:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504151] Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091457.n59EvHg5005169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504151 --- Comment #1 from Stepan Kasal 2009-06-09 10:57:15 EDT --- FAIL source files match upstream there seems to be no upstream. Source0: is a 70 lines long script; was it published somewhere? When adding this to the cvs, please commit Source0 as a text file, do not upload using the "sources"mechanism The URL: tag points to a list post post from 2006 that contained an almost identical script. But the Source0: script contains a copyright header; if the origin of that is a priv. comm. with the packager, please explain that in a comment in the spec file. Actually, the link to the posting is better suited to be a comment, not an URL: tag. FAIL package meets naming and versioning guidelines. version: 20060718 -- I would use a lower version number, like 0.0.20060718 because I hate when one has to use epoch to go to a later version, if this library is ever released. -- Why the version resembles a date in 2006 (the original post) when the copyright mentiones (c) 2005-2008 ? OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK build root is correct. FAIL license field matches the actual license. the licence fields says GPLv2, while the script inmplies it should be "MIT". OK license is open source-compatible. (both are :-) OK license text not included upstream. OK license text not included in package, as it is not included upstream, as there is no upstream. FAIL latest version is being packaged. Who knows? This would also be resolved by the comment about the actual origin of the script, for which I asked above. FAIL BuildRequires are proper. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python says: Python packages should be sure to have: BuildRequires: python-devel OK %clean is present. FAIL package builds in mock. add the mandatory build require and do s/py$/py*/ in %files to pack pycpyo then ok OK package installs properly. OK no debuginfo package FAIL rpmlint is silent. -- see below, the warnings should be ignored, but the error should not: the module should not have executable bit set OK final provides and requires are sane OK %check not present, no test suite available OK no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths. OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. FAIL file permissions are appropriate. clear the exec bit on the module OK no scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK no docs, headers, .pc files, .la files, desktop files To sum up: 1) fix the 8 items marked FAIL 2) Moreover, I feel uneasy about creating this microscopic package; I'd like to see a comment from someone who understand what is this module good for and why is has to be packed as a tiny individual rpm. Appendix: $ rpmlint -i python-iterthreader-20060718-1.fc11.{noarch,src}.rpm python-iterthreader.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0-1 ['20060718-1.fc11', '20060718-1'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. python-iterthreader.noarch: W: no-documentation The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include documentation files. python-iterthreader.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/iterthreader.py This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 14:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:59:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091459.n59ExB5C011332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504293 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 14:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 10:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] New: Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 Summary: Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rrakus at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/c/cd/System-config-selinux.spec SRPM URL: https://fedoraproject.org/w/uploads/f/f5/System-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm Description: system-config-selinux is meant to be replacement of policycoreutils-gui. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 15:05:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:05:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504151] Review Request: python-iterthreader - Threaded itertools.imap In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091505.n59F5E3w013285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504151 --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-09 11:05:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 2) Moreover, I feel uneasy about creating this microscopic package; > I'd like to see a comment from someone who understand what is this module > good for and why is has to be packed as a tiny individual rpm. Just my comment ... this is not C, so even in 70 lines of code it is possible to make useful library, which this seems to be. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 15:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091521.n59FLcTo013137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jreznik at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 15:25:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:25:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091525.n59FPTDe014350@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 Jaroslav Reznik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jreznik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 15:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091532.n59FWQJn016367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 --- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-06-09 11:32:25 EDT --- Quick overview before deeper review (I'll finish it later): - version (2.0.62) and release (13) don't match changelog ones (1.0.0-1) - inconsistent usage of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - use only one - use lowercase SPEC filename - no %doc RPMLint rpmlint System-config-selinux.spec System-config-selinux.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install System-config-selinux.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 40, tab: line 1) 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. rpmlint System-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm system-config-selinux.src: W: non-coherent-filename System-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm system-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 15:47:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:47:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091547.n59Fl1Xt021661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 --- Comment #2 from Roman Rakus 2009-06-09 11:47:00 EDT --- >Quick overview before deeper review (I'll finish it later): >- version (2.0.62) and release (13) don't match changelog ones (1.0.0-1) fixed >- inconsistent usage of %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - use only one used %{buildroot} >- use lowercase SPEC filename It is lowercase. Just uploaded file on fedoraproject.org/wiki starts with uppercase character. I don't know why. But finally it will be lowercase. >- no %doc It has not any doc >RPMLint >rpmlint System-config-selinux.spec >System-config-selinux.spec: E: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install fixed >System-config-selinux.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 40, >tab: line 1) fixed >0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. >rpmlint System-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm >system-config-selinux.src: W: non-coherent-filename >System-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm >system-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc12.src.rpm The same as above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091730.n59HUHFB024369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #3 from Gareth John 2009-06-09 13:30:16 EDT --- Spec URL: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox.spec SRPM URL: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox-0.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm There is the latest revision. I have added and tidy the BR, I am reasonably sure that they are correct, I'm in the middle of moving at the minute and am aware i have not done much in a few days (week) and wanted to post. This should be complete however as times are hectic. Thanks Mamoru for the log was helpful. Have not studied it greatly but will do so. Tomorrow or at least sometime this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091735.n59HZq5W022984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-09 13:35:51 EDT --- 1. ... %install make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} ln -sf consolehelper %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/system-config-selinux ... desktop-file-install --vendor fedora \ --dir %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/applications \ %{SOURCE2} rm -rf %{buildroot} Having rm -rf %{buildroot} as the last line of install is almost certainly NOT what you want. 2. Spec references selinux-polgengui.desktop, not in the source RPM. 3. It uses consolehelper 4. How much of this is something we really need a GUI for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091741.n59HfgKY028132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-09 13:41:41 EDT --- Just a note: - Please change the release number of your spec/srpm every time you modify them to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:42:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091742.n59HgdaI028305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #11 from Sean Middleditch 2009-06-09 13:42:38 EDT --- Weird. The tarball I uploaded was a make dist from the 0.11.2 SVN checkout. Guess upstream did something funny when they rolled the release. Will test with upstream's tarball. I am unsure how I am supposed to fix AUTHORS, since it is part of the upstream source. Am I supposed to use the RPM patch mechanism for this? (Guess I better read up on how that works now either way.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091746.n59Hkn4G025680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091747.n59HlTBE025805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:48:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:48:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503586] Review Request: python-tgext-crud - Crud Controller Extension for TG2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091748.n59HmDlV029585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503586 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |johnp at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 17:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091749.n59HnosP029794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 18:04:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:04:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091804.n59I4vdw030434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-09 14:04:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Weird. The tarball I uploaded was a make dist from the 0.11.2 SVN checkout. - Well, you are saying that you are using svn repository based tarball, not the tarball formally relased and put on the URL written as "%Source" in your spec file? If you are using svn repo based tarball, please follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages > I am unsure how I am supposed to fix AUTHORS, since it is part of the upstream > source. Am I supposed to use the RPM patch mechanism for this? (Guess I > better read up on how that works now either way.) - Just using iconv is enough. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 18:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504641] Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091823.n59INuMe005962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cweyl at alumni.drew.edu --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-09 14:23:54 EDT --- A couple comments after a quick once-over: This package isn't delivering any modules (*.pm), so we can safely omit the "requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT...)". Group is largely irrelevant these days (AFAIK), but there's probably a better one than Development/Libraries. The description should probably end with a "." :) README should be included in %doc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 18:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091831.n59IV1Pu005008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #4 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-06-09 14:31:00 EDT --- I think all issues are fixed now. Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard-4.3-3.fc11.src.rpm One more thing: I install the JAR files without version in their name, is that a problem? Most of the time Java packages install a versioned JAR file and create an unversioned symlink. Would that be better? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 18:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 14:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504243] Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091857.n59IvccD014329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504243 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-06-09 14:57:36 EDT --- Sorry, several things cropped up to slow me down on this, I intended to have this done many days ago. OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/php-getid3-1.7.9-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SRPMS/php-getid3-1.7.9-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 rpmbuild]$ rpmlint SPECS/php-getid3.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-getid3-2.0.0b5-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint php-getid3.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-getid3-2.0.0b5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . On the website, gplv2 is specified as the license. License.txt included in source also agrees with gplv2 OK: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines d2b24ccb4bd4a5c135517bd0ae3b2dd3 getid3-2.0.0b5.zip d2b24ccb4bd4a5c135517bd0ae3b2dd3 getid3-2.0.0b5.zip.1 OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. Really no compile or build, php does runtime compilatoins. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. N/A: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. N/A: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. N/A: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. N/A: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:02:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:02:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226659] Merge Review: xsri In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091902.n59J21ss012829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226659 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-09 15:01:59 EDT --- re-re-ping? I added two other previous maintainers to CC. Please do not ignore! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226075] Merge Review: libXinerama In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091903.n59J36gH015698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226075 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-09 15:03:04 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091906.n59J6MRV013896@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #23 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-09 15:06:21 EDT --- ping? no one wants to fix the trivial things I pointed in comments #7 and #22 ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091905.n59J55ON013598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bnocera at redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-09 15:05:03 EDT --- re-ping? I added more previous maintainers to the CC. Please DO NOT IGNORE! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:08:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:08:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091908.n59J8bCi014270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #25 from Lane 2009-06-09 15:08:35 EDT --- I tried building this and it failed saying it required perl-Verilog 3.2. You might want to update this version in the build dependencies list. Also, is perl-Verilog 3.2 rpm available? I only saw 3.12 in rawhide. Maybe I missed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:12:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:12:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091912.n59JCOll015227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |loganjerry at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jerry James 2009-06-09 15:12:22 EDT --- Ooh, I've wasted hours of my life on rogue and nethack. I'll take this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091926.n59JQDlo018261@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #31 from Lane 2009-06-09 15:26:11 EDT --- I updated verilator to the latest 3.710 and also switched to using the SYSTEMPERL_INCLUDE env variable to be compatible with the systemperl installation location. Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.710-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:37:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091937.n59JbNdO026704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Brennan Ashton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #26 from Brennan Ashton 2009-06-09 15:37:22 EDT --- [PASS] source files match upstream [PASS] package meets naming and versioning guidelines. [PASS] specfile is properly named [PASS] dist tag is present. [PASS] build root is correct. [PASS] license field matches the actual license. [PASS] license is open source-compatible. [PASS] latest version is being packaged. [PASS] BuildRequires are proper. [PASS] %clean is present. [N/A] package builds in mock. Building with a koji build of perl-Verlog [PASS] package installs properly. debuginfo package looks complete. [PASS] %check is present and all tests pass: [PASS] owns the directories it creates. [PASS] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [PASS] no duplicates in %files. [PASS] file permissions are appropriate. [PASS] no scriptlets present. [PASS] code, not content. [PASS] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. I Approve with the perl-Verlog in koji. Lane is right, you should add the new version requirement of perl-Verlog to the spec. After this go ahead with CVS request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091938.n59Jc1JX020806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 Xavier Bachelot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier at bachelot.org --- Comment #7 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-09 15:38:00 EDT --- I cannot sponsor you, but here are a few comments about the spec : - Source0 needs to be a full URL. - The beta status of the package should be reflected in the release tag and thus the version needs to be modified. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages - Why are you disabling postgres support ? - Why are you installing files manually ? Upstream is not providing an install target in the Makefile ? - The initscript should be in %{_initrddir}. - There are spurious spaces in the mkdir lines. - The first 3 %attr in the %files section are unneeded, the perms are already properly set at install time. - The package doesn't own %{_sysconfdir}/ndoutils - You don't need to set the dir perms on the last 3 %attr, this is the standard perms. - %postun section is empty. - Add the version and release in the changelog entry. - You're missing Requires: for the initscripts and scriptlets are not matching the guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SysVInitScript#Initscripts_in_spec_file_scriptlets There's probably more than that, but this is a start. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 19:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 15:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504243] Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906091946.n59JkAPP028603@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504243 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-09 15:46:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-getid3 Short Description: The PHP media file parser Owners: roma Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: roma Thanks, David. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 20:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092003.n59K36ho025810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #5 from Gareth John 2009-06-09 16:03:05 EDT --- I apologise i do change the revision i just copied the wrong link, here is the latest one SRPM URL: http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/paperbox-0.4.2-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 20:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092023.n59KNujp030794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-06-09 16:23:54 EDT --- rpmlint output: slashem.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/games/slashem/record slashem.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/slashem 0775 slashem.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/games/slashem/slashem 02755 slashem.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/games/slashem/perm slashem.x86_64: E: zero-length /var/games/slashem/logfile slashem.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/games/slashem/save 0775 slashem.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post ln slashem.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 2 warnings. The zero-length files are okay, because they will become nonzero as people play the game, and they are all marked %config(noreplace). The nonstandard dir permissions are copied from nethack, so they're fine. But the dangerous commands need to be dealt with. Looking through the scriptlets, it appears you need to add these to the spec file: Requires(post): coreutils, mkfontdir Requires(preun): coreutils Is mkfontdir really a BuildRequires? I only see it invoked in %post. MUST items: OK: package naming guidelines OK: spec file name X: packaging guidelines -- see the section on scriptlets. I believe that the body of your %post script should be wrapped in this: if [ $1 -eq 1 ]; then ... fi and the body of your %preun script should be wrapped in this: if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then ... fi OK: licensing guidelines OK: license text matches actual license OK: license file included in %doc OK: spec file in American English OK: spec file legible OK: source file matches upstream OK: builds on at least one primary arch (x86_64) NA: appropriate use of ExcludeArch OK: all dependencies listed in BuildRequires NA: proper handling of locales NA: library installation => invoke ldconfig NA: relocatable package OK: package owns all directories it creates OK: no duplicate file listings OK: proper file permissions OK: %clean section OK: consistent use of macros OK: code or permissible content NA: large documentation in -doc OK: no runtime dependencies in %doc NA: header files in -devel NA: static libraries in -static NA: pkgconfig file => Requires: pkgconfig NA: .so files in -devel NA: -devel requires main package OK: no libtool archives OK: desktop file. However, not this sentence from the Packaging guidelines: For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files. Existing packages that use a vendor tag must continue to do so for the life of the package. This is mostly for the sake of menu-editing (which bases off of .desktop file/path names). OK: do not own files/dirs already owned by other packages OK: remove buildroot first in %install OK: all filenames are valid UTF-8 SHOULD items: NA: ask upstream to include a license file NA: description and summary translations OK: package builds in mock (only checked fedora-rawhide-x86_64) --: package builds on all supported arches (unable to check) OK: package functions as described (only minimal testing ... just wait until later!) OK: sane scriptlets NA: subpackages require main package NA: placement of pkgconfig files NA: file dependencies -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 20:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504641] Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092041.n59Kf9UU001905@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641 --- Comment #2 from Ruben Kerkhof 2009-06-09 16:41:08 EDT --- Thanks Chris, fixed all of the issues. New version here: Spec URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/sendxmpp.spec SRPM URL: http://ruben.fedorapeople.org/sendxmpp-0.0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 20:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092038.n59Kc10g001171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-09 16:38:00 EDT --- Thanks, we're almost there. Versioned jar symlinks are for convenience with java libraries. Will anyone use proguard's jar files as a library? If yes, then it is a good idea to make unversioned symlinks. ! Would you consider adding a GenericName key to the .desktop file? That will make KDE users happy. Gnome uses Comment, KDE uses GenericName. ! You can BR ImageMagick and convert those icons in your specfile. That way you don't need to deal with additional sources. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 20:41:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:41:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092041.n59KfoNb009349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-09 16:41:50 EDT --- On a second thought, these are not blockers. You can do these changes before you commit if you want. ------------------------------------------- This package (proguard) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 20:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 16:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092057.n59KvSjB012136@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #19 from John Anderson 2009-06-09 16:57:24 EDT --- I filed a bug upstream regarding lack of tagging or any other way of marking releases in their source: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511409 They said they were planning on getting their repository cleaned up this month when talking to them in #ifolder. Right now it seems theres no good way to pull the source for a release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 21:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092125.n59LPSM9011072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-09 17:25:26 EDT --- Setting "cvs?" because Paul seems to lack privileges. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 21:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 17:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092157.n59LvaDT017270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-09 17:57:35 EDT --- OK, I'll have a look after you have fixed the remaining issues in gtkmm-utils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 22:37:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:37:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092237.n59MbufR006779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #39 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-09 18:37:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #35) > Also, could you wait for the 2.2.3 release, which is scheduled for next week? > *A lot* of bugs have been fixed in this release. This is a package review for admitting the package in Fedora, not a bug-tracker ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 22:47:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 18:47:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504891] New: Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 Summary: Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: loganjerry at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/trove/trove.spec SRPM URL: http://jjames.fedorapeople.org/trove/trove-2.0.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The GNU Trove library has two objectives: - Provide "free" (as in "free speech" and "free beer"), fast, lightweight implementations of the java.util Collections API. These implementations are designed to be pluggable replacements for their JDK equivalents. - Whenever possible, provide the same collections support for primitive types. This gap in the JDK is often addressed by using the "wrapper" classes (java.lang.Integer, java.lang.Float, etc.) with Object-based collections. For most applications, however, collections which store primitives directly will require less space and yield significant performance gains. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:12:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:12:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092312.n59NCCst019471@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #40 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-09 19:12:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Toshio, I totally understand your points. We are well aware of all of those > disadvantages of bundling/forking that you mentioned, but given our > circumstances we decided that bundling/forking Boost is the best solution, > despite all the aforementioned disadvantages. We made this decision a year ago, > and to date we still think that it's the right decision. > Note that what we're saying is that forking (and forming another upstream) actually is better then bundling (whether forked or not). Also, we'd like to see an effort made to have the changes applied to boost be sent and accepted upstream even though that would include more work (*NIX -> win32 compat). Upstream would then at least stand a chance in whether they want to make stuff win32 compat. or whether to ignore/reject the patch at all. If you decide to do so, please keep me in the loop. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 9 23:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 19:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470696] Review Request: rubygem-passenger - Passenger Ruby on Rails deployment system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906092355.n59Ntgvm028195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 --- Comment #41 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-09 19:55:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Toshio, I totally understand your points. We are well aware of all of those > disadvantages of bundling/forking that you mentioned, but given our > circumstances we decided that bundling/forking Boost is the best solution, > despite all the aforementioned disadvantages. We made this decision a year ago, > and to date we still think that it's the right decision. > Bundling may be the right decision for an upstream development shop. However, it is definitely not the right decision for software that is shipped in many distributions or for the conscientious system administrators. Bundling shifts the cost of forking so that developers bear less up front costs but distributions and system administrators bear more costs later on. In the case of embargoed security fixes the cost is paid when there is time pressure to get a fix created before a certain deadline is reached. In the case of bug-fixes and enhancements (features, performance), the cost penalty is less urgent but still occurs in the form of duplicate bugs, analysis, and debugging against the bundled version of the library when that work has already gone into the system library and resolved there via a patch or upgrade. Not only is the cost shifted around but the benefits are decreased when the forked library is bundled instead of released separately. If the changes that prompt you to bundle the library are useful for you, why won't they be useful for others as well? If they're useful for others, then bundling the library forces them to reinvent the same types of changes you've made instead of working with you to get their make a better product overall. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:23:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:23:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100023.n5A0NpZh017360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-09 20:23:50 EDT --- forgot to mention, mine has some improvements over Fabian's, like dropping .la files. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100022.n5A0MPn1017069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-09 20:22:24 EDT --- The spec contributed by Fabian is clearly based on my Mandriva spec (see, for comparison, http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/navit/current/SPECS/navit.spec?view=markup ) - it would have been polite to acknowledge this in the submission, Fabian. I have built my own modified version of my Mandriva package... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.0-1.aw_fc11.src.rpm http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit.spec obviously it's similar to Fabian's. I tried building current SVN today, but on Fedora 11 it crashes as soon as it has to render text to a map. I've reported this to upstream: http://trac.navit-project.org/ticket/379 . I can provide that build too, if anyone's interested. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100026.n5A0Qdad019013@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Paul Lange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #43 from Paul Lange 2009-06-09 20:26:38 EDT --- - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review: monodevelop-debugger-mdb.i586: E: no-binary monodevelop-debugger-mdb.i586: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib monodevelop-debugger-mdb.i586: W: no-documentation monodevelop-debugger-mdb.src:47: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/DebuggerClient.dll* monodevelop-debugger-mdb.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/DebuggerServer.exe* monodevelop-debugger-mdb.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel.i586: E: description-line-too-long The monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel package contains development files for monodevelop-debugger-mdb. monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 3 warnings. * hardcoded paths are only the old location - OK * no-documentation: no docs available * no-binary, only-non-bin...: mono bins are not recognized * TODO: shorten description line - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec OK - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. OK - b60e9a0783f294aaa137c78e32c4f6be - md5 of the original tarball - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. OK - i386 - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK - bug in x86_64 and mono-debugger not available on other architectures - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. OK - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. OK ############################################################ One thing left before you can upload the package in CVS: - Please shorten the Description line. (Simply place the %{name} variable in a new line. This is the only thing left. It's only minor, so I'm going to approve this package right now. Thank you for the hard work. Do you already have been sponsored? More info for the next steps: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:50:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:50:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100050.n5A0oep7017027@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Martin Dengler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martin at martindengler.com --- Comment #22 from Martin Dengler 2009-06-09 20:50:38 EDT --- The rpm is broken as it is currently in rawhide (code fails to import bitfrost). The specfile doesn't look correct to me. It shouldn't be deleting part of the code it's meant to install. This patch fixes it for me: --- sugar-update-control.spec | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/sugar-update-control.spec b/sugar-update-control.spec index d5e16aa..09eda58 100644 --- a/sugar-update-control.spec +++ b/sugar-update-control.spec @@ -33,8 +33,6 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{__python} setup.py install --root=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT -# avoid conflicts with standard __init__.py* -rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python_sitelib}/{bitfrost,bitfrost/update,bitfrost/util}/__init__.py* %find_lang %{name} %clean -- 1.6.0.6 ~ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100050.n5A0ob1t028474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-09 20:50:35 EDT --- btw, I think the -devel package is bogus...the 'libraries' are just plugins, they shouldn't have been installed as shared libraries by navit in the first place. they should only contain .so files (not .so.0.0.0 and .so.0) and these should be in the main package(s). I don't know why Fabian removed the split of different rendering engines from my package. The reason they were split is to reduce dependencies - if you roll them all together, as Fabian did, you have to have libqt4 installed to install navit even if you have no intention of ever using the QT renderer. ditto cegui etc. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 00:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 20:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100055.n5A0tbie030601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #44 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-09 20:55:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) > - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted > in the review: > monodevelop-debugger-mdb.i586: E: no-binary > monodevelop-debugger-mdb.i586: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > monodevelop-debugger-mdb.i586: W: no-documentation > monodevelop-debugger-mdb.src:47: E: hardcoded-library-path in > %{_prefix}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/DebuggerClient.dll* > monodevelop-debugger-mdb.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in > %{_prefix}/lib/monodevelop/AddIns/MonoDevelop.Debugger/DebuggerServer.exe* > monodevelop-debugger-mdb.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in > %{buildroot}/usr/lib > monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel.i586: E: description-line-too-long The > monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel package contains development files for > monodevelop-debugger-mdb. > monodevelop-debugger-mdb-devel.i586: W: no-documentation > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 3 warnings. > > * hardcoded paths are only the old location - OK > * no-documentation: no docs available > * no-binary, only-non-bin...: mono bins are not recognized > > * TODO: shorten description line > > > - MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines > OK > > - MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the > format %{name}.spec > OK > > - MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines. > OK > > - MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet > the Licensing Guidelines. > OK > > - MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > OK > > - MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the > package must be included in %doc. > OK > > - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. > OK > > - MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. > OK > > - MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, > as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no > upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL > Guidelines for how to deal with this. > OK - b60e9a0783f294aaa137c78e32c4f6be - md5 of the original tarball > > - MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at > least one primary architecture. > OK - i386 > > - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an > architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in > ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in > bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on > that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the > corresponding ExcludeArch line. > OK - bug in x86_64 and mono-debugger not available on other architectures > > - MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any > that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; > inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. > OK > > - MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > OK > > - MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set > with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a > %defattr(...) line. > OK > > - MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf > %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). > OK > > - MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. > OK > > - MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. > OK > > - MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other > packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed > should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This > means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with > any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you > feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another > package owns, then please present that at package review time. > OK > > - MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} > (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). > OK > > - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. > OK > > ############################################################ > > One thing left before you can upload the package in CVS: > > - Please shorten the Description line. (Simply place the %{name} variable in a > new line. you mean just this?: %description %{name} > > This is the only thing left. It's only minor, so I'm going to approve this > package right now. Thank you for the hard work. Do you already have been > sponsored? Think not, Toshio help me at the beggining but think that no one officially sponsor me... > > More info for the next steps: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored reading... > > APPROVED Great!!!, uuhhuuu, finally my first package...what a ride ;-) Thanks Paul.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 01:53:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 21:53:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100153.n5A1rgD3022673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #25 from Ed Brand 2009-06-09 21:53:39 EDT --- Since /usr/bin/sl conflicts with the sl package (Steam Locomotive) Any one care to suggest a new name for sl before i pick one out of the hat -Ed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 03:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:12:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100312.n5A3C0Qg027674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-09 23:11:59 EDT --- Yep, all three of those make sense. And I only needed one tiny little bugfix (already in upstream) to make it build against the latest Catalyst-Runtime. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/mojomojo-0.999029-2.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1402924 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 03:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100349.n5A3npeX010432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #3 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-09 23:49:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > the game, and they are all marked %config(noreplace). The nonstandard dir > permissions are copied from nethack, so they're fine. Just about everything was copied from nethack.... > But the dangerous > commands need to be dealt with. Looking through the scriptlets, it appears you > need to add these to the spec file: > > Requires(post): coreutils, mkfontdir > Requires(preun): coreutils And there was me thinking that rpmlint just meant "rm" and "ln" were potentially dangerous. The necessary requires for scriptlets are added. > Is mkfontdir really a BuildRequires? I only see it invoked in %post. Ack. Dropped as a BR. > X: packaging guidelines -- see the section on scriptlets. I believe that the > body of your %post script should be wrapped in this: > > if [ $1 -eq 1 ]; then > ... > fi I think that %post should also run on upgrade - just in case something changes with the fonts. > and the body of your %preun script should be wrapped in this: > > if [ $1 -eq 0 ]; then > ... > fi But, of course, this one is needed - otherwise upgrades are broken. Both now "exit 0" as well, just in case. > OK: desktop file. However, not this sentence from the Packaging guidelines: > > For new packages, do not apply a vendor tag to desktop files. Ack. > OK: package builds in mock (only checked fedora-rawhide-x86_64) > --: package builds on all supported arches (unable to check) The scratch-build in koji shows that it builds on all primary arches. > OK: package functions as described (only minimal testing ... just wait until > later!) And the resulting build runs on ppc too (now _that's_ why I got a PS3 - nethack and slashem on the big screen!) Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/slashem.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~iarnell/review/slashem-0.0.8-0.2.E0F1.fc12.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1402932 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 03:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 23:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100320.n5A3KC5m016457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 --- Comment #27 from Bug Zapper 2009-06-09 23:20:10 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 9 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 9. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '9'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 9's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 9 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 04:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:44:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100444.n5A4icqK024493@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-10 00:44:37 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 04:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100446.n5A4kpG4025159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-10 00:46:51 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 04:45:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:45:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100445.n5A4jYFF024916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-10 00:45:33 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 04:51:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:51:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504243] Review Request: php-getid3 - The PHP media file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100451.n5A4pR7p026125@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504243 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-10 00:51:26 EDT --- cvs done except for the F-9 branch. We are no longer doing F-9 branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 04:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100454.n5A4sCgb026508@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-10 00:54:10 EDT --- Yeah, F-9 branches are no longer done. You can ask for an exception, I guess from FESCo? File a ticket: http://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 04:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 00:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100458.n5A4wRIB017497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-10 00:58:26 EDT --- Does Conrad want to maintain this in EPEL? or doesn't care? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 05:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100555.n5A5tg8J030887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-10 01:55:41 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. - OK rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11.i586.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/tuxmath-debuginfo-1.7.2-4.fc11.i586.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - OK # MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. -OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. -OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. -OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403044 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture... - OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. -OK MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. -OK, no shared library MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable - OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - ok, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files present MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. - OK, no .so library MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}{release} - OK, no devel package MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK, no .la archives MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file - OK, desktop file present and desktop-file-install used MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. - OK Conclusion: APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 05:56:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:56:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100556.n5A5uXtW008908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 06:00:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:00:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495322] Review Request: python-cmd2 - Enhancements for Python's cmd module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100600.n5A60JWY010138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495322 Silas Sewell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Silas Sewell 2009-06-10 02:00:18 EDT --- I've decided to use python-cly and I'm not interested in pursuing this package. I'll keep the SRPM/SPEC available if anyone would like to take it over. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 06:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504746] Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100611.n5A6Br2V002055@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-10 02:11:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 06:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504736] Review Request: perl-File-ChangeNotify - Watch for changes to files, cross-platform style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100611.n5A6BuwJ012624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504736 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-10 02:11:55 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 06:15:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:15:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100615.n5A6Foh0013658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-10 02:15:49 EDT --- Summary: The Mutt of Feed Readers I don't think that this is good summary. Better would be imho "Configurable text-based feed reader", because it much more describe what is content of package. "The Mutt of Feed Readers" tell nothing to somebody who doesn't know mutt (if you refer to mail client) and for me it looks like commercial. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 06:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501957] Review Request: perl-Tk--ProgressBar-Mac - Mac ProgressBar for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100635.n5A6Zsfn018514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501957 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501960 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 06:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 02:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100635.n5A6Zr07018485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com Depends on| |501957 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 07:34:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:34:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100734.n5A7YsOR022215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #17 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-10 03:34:53 EDT --- I have no interest in EPEL; Richard is totally free to take it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 08:26:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:26:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100826.n5A8QG7Q004720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |485460 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 08:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 04:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100829.n5A8Tkob005701@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 04:29:45 EDT --- Upstream has now confirmed the licensing situation. There is nothing nonfree in the package, only GPL and LPPL. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/jaxodraw-2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 09:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100947.n5A9lZ39027664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-10 05:47:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tslib Short Description: Touchscreen Access Library Owners: kwizart Branches: devel F-11 F-10 EL-5 Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 09:46:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:46:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906100946.n5A9keNd027451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-10 05:46:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > APPROVED > > [...] > > Some observations, though: And again, some very good comments. > * Version 1.0 of tslib uses version 0.0 in its SONAME and in the pkg-config Indeed, but until they change the API without bumping the release field, we can still assure they are using it right despite it could have been done better. > * The modules/plugins pollute the automatic RPM Provides (and hence the > metadata) with their *.so names: > > $ rpm -qp --provides tslib-1.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm|grep -e so[^.] It should be possible for the rpm dependency extractor to filter them as soon as it discovers that they are module to be used with dlopen ? It would be wondefull. > * Asking upstream to run autogen.sh prior to creating the source tarball would > be helpful. Yep, despite it could lead to problem once the sources are generated with a version of libtool patched in an incompatible way. (experienced with vlc in F-11: a binary failed to link with a just built library unless rpath as used at build time which I've explicitely forbidden). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 10:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101023.n5AANo7u006160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Steve Dickson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101100.n5AB01cl016058@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 --- Comment #4 from Roman Rakus 2009-06-10 06:59:59 EDT --- ad 1) fixed ad 2) selinux-polgengui.desktop is in srpm ad 3) Uses connsolhelper, like 99% of others. This is meant to be separate package, which I will take care of and fix many bugs including rework to use PolicyKit ad 4) I don't know -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:02:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:02:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101102.n5AB2lWq027851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-10 07:02:46 EDT --- koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1400997 verified upstream source as 96bd3826de65d96cfc00e1752658a0f20de19e71 washra-fonts-4.1.zip APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101108.n5AB8C3m029454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-10 07:08:11 EDT --- REVIEW: + rpmlint is almost silent - it only complains about empty sections, which should be removed (however it's a purely cosmetic change): [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint flamerobin-* flamerobin.i386: W: empty-%post flamerobin.i386: W: empty-%postun flamerobin.i386: W: empty-%posttrans 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. +/- The package meets the Packaging Guidelines with one remaining issue - doc-files are listed twice. First - as %doc, second - as a contents of %{_datadir}/%{name}/docs. I advice you to add rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name}/docs at the end of the %install section. Btw, maybe it's better to list docs as "%doc docs/*" rather than "%doc docs" ? + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, is included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See links above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + A package owns all directories that it creates. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. There is a single place where the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT is used instead of %{buildroot} - this may be ignored. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed (checked with desktop-file-validate in the %install section). + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Conclusion: * consider to remove empty sections from spec-file * remove duplicated docs from $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:29:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:29:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481333] Review Request: sugar-update-control - Activity update control panel for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101129.n5ABTYZx002960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481333 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at gmail.com --- Comment #23 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-10 07:29:31 EDT --- Thanks for the report. New builds have been submitted. If you have any other issues please open a new report. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504809] Review Request: system-config-selinux - SELinux configuration GUI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101128.n5ABSLMZ002706@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504809 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Reznik 2009-06-10 07:28:20 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Check ! = Problem ? = Not evaluated === REQUIRED ITEMS === [x] Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x] Spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [!] Package meets the Packaging Guidelines. [x] Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Tested on: builds in Koji [x] Rpmlint output: rpmlint system-config-selinux-2.0.62-13.fc10.noarch.rpm system-config-selinux.noarch: W: no-documentation - no doc system-config-selinux.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode system-config-selinux.noarch: W: no-dependency-on usermode - depends on usermode-gtk, is it enough? SRPM & SPEC clean [-] Package is not relocatable. [x] Buildroot is correct [x] Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x] License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. License type: GPLv2+ [-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x] Spec file is legible and written in American English. [!] Sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - Can't get sources. [x] All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [-] The spec file handles locales properly. [-] ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x] Package must own all directories that it creates. [x] Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x] Permissions on files are set properly. [x] Package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [x] Package consistently uses macros. [-] Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [-] Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-] Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Static libraries in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package requires pkgconfig, if .pc files are present. [-] Development .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [-] Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la). [!] Package contains a properly installed %{name}.desktop file if it is a GUI application. === SUGGESTED ITEMS === [x] Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-] Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x] Reviewer should test that the package builds in koji. - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403234 [x] Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [?] Package functions as described. - not tested yet, I'll check final one [-] Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-] The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct. [-] File based requires are sane. === SUMMARY === - Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403234 - Please publish tarball to default fedorahosted.org release directory (https://fedorahosted.org/releases/s/y/system-config-selinux) - do not apply vendor tag in desktop-file-install (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:38:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:38:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] New: Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Summary: Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Alien-SeleniumRC/perl-Alien-SeleniumRC.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Alien-SeleniumRC/perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-1.00-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Selenium Remote Control is a test tool that allows you to write automated web application UI tests in any programming language against any HTTP website using any mainstream JavaScript-enabled browser. It provides a Selenium Server, which can automatically start/stop/control any supported browser. It works by using Selenium Core, a pure-HTML+JS library that performs automated tasks in JavaScript. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] New: Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-veditor.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Eclipse Verilog editor is a plugin for the Eclipse IDE. It provides Verilog(IEEE-1364) and VHDL language specific code viewer, contents outline, code assist etc. It helps coding and debugging in hardware development based on Verilog or VHDL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 11:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 07:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101159.n5ABx3jO011455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-10 07:59:02 EDT --- Many thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: senamirmir-washra-font Short Description: Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script Owners: nim Branches: F11 & devel InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 12:02:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:02:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101202.n5AC2xms001265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 12:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101237.n5ACb4Hg021409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-10 08:37:03 EDT --- OK rpmlint on every package. OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK package has a good license. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. FAIL The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. srpm 8dfe7a67b2246e6ceb85a912fd642687 != 92a34ab58b49a6b70053a35d7bb57469 src OK successful koji compilation. OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 12:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101240.n5ACe3WL022341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 --- Comment #5 from Byron Clark 2009-06-10 08:40:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > I don't think that this is good summary. I replaced the summary. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter-2.0-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 12:54:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:54:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101254.n5ACs8Dd015211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 08:54:07 EDT --- You are not supposed to use both python_sitelib and python_sitearch. If the package contains architecture specific components you need to use sitearch, else sitelib. If you're building on 32-bit, these will point to the same location. On 64-bit architectures the build will fail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101302.n5AD2nOQ028337@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101310.n5ADARwt030895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-10 09:10:26 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > FAIL The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. > srpm 8dfe7a67b2246e6ceb85a912fd642687 != 92a34ab58b49a6b70053a35d7bb57469 src Downloading the upstream sources once again, I still get a md5sum of 8dfe7a67b2246e6ceb85a912fd642687. I've tried two different CPAN mirrors and can't see what I'm doing wrong. Marcela, do you remember which you downloaded the tarball from ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:21:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:21:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101321.n5ADLT3N022663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-10 09:21:28 EDT --- Hm, I tried again and it's matching. Never mind, it looks all right now. ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101325.n5ADPDfL023728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-10 09:25:12 EDT --- :-) Thanks for the review! Requesting CVS. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC Short Description: Packages the Selenium Remote Control server Owners: eseyman Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101329.n5ADTaLp003449@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #9 from Byron Clark 2009-06-10 09:29:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > You are not supposed to use both python_sitelib and python_sitearch. If the > package contains architecture specific components you need to use sitearch, > else sitelib. The build now only uses python_sitearch. This also included modifying a patch to the stfl buildsystem. The patch has been submitted upstream. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl-0.20-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:36:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:36:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101336.n5ADaIPu005917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-10 09:36:17 EDT --- Reopening. No one did a review here! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101346.n5ADkIBZ030410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 --- Comment #4 from Steve Dickson 2009-06-10 09:46:18 EDT --- oops... sorry about that... I though this was about the licensing problems... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] New: Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Summary: Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Config-Auto/perl-Config-Auto.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Config-Auto/perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module was written after having to write Yet Another Config File Parser for some variety of colon-separated config. It searches the filesystem for the program's configuration file, basing itself on the program's name and returns a data structure based on the file's contents. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 13:49:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 09:49:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101349.n5ADnSe7031195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #19 from Philippe Makowski 2009-06-10 09:49:27 EDT --- ok * consider to remove empty sections from spec-file made * remove duplicated docs from $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/%{name} made I also removed the no need BuildRequires:ImageMagick changes made : Spec URL: http://ibphoenix.fr//fedora/flamerobin.spec http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101400.n5AE0aF5002642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 --- Comment #10 from Tim Waugh 2009-06-10 10:00:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > - Change > Requires(post): /usr/bin/mkfontscale /usr/bin/mkfontdir > to > Requires(post): xorg-x11-font-utils > as this is the package that provides those since Fedora Core 2 (2004). Done. > - I'm not totally sure you need > Requires(post): fontconfig > Requires(postun): fontconfig > as you already have Requires: fontconfig. Besides, this is probably > automatically picked up by rpm. Doesn't hurt having them, though. Left alone. > - Change references to /etc to %{_sysconfdir} Done. > - Setting umask is probably not necessary as this is done by rpm. > - Replace `which mkfontdir` with plain mkfontdir. Not sure about these. The scriptlets were copied from urw-fonts, so if they need fixing they ought to be fixed in both places. > - Drop > %dir %{catalogue} > in %files section, as > $ rpm -qf /etc/X11/fontpath.d/ > filesystem-2.4.19-1.fc10.i386 > is already owned on every installation. Done. > - I can't find a single mention of a license in the tarball! No, *sigh*. Tom Callaway looked into the licenses in July last year, and there haven't been any developments since then. 5.50-21.fc12 built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:03:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:03:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101403.n5AE3LAi013933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #20 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-10 10:03:20 EDT --- Ok, APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101404.n5AE4gV8014221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:03:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:03:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226197] Merge Review: nfs-utils-lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101403.n5AE3wO6003420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226197 --- Comment #5 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-10 10:03:57 EDT --- Well, there are some good review findings in the bottom half of comment 1. To add to that, the "Requires(pre): /sbin/ldconfig" is completely superfluous because the packages doesn't contain a pre scriptlet at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:10:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:10:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101410.n5AEAskp016114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 10:10:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > > - Setting umask is probably not necessary as this is done by rpm. > > - Replace `which mkfontdir` with plain mkfontdir. > > Not sure about these. The scriptlets were copied from urw-fonts, so if they > need fixing they ought to be fixed in both places. urw-fonts hasn't been through a merge review, so you really can't trust that the packaging is sane on all accounts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:17:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:17:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101417.n5AEHjVA007506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #4 from Jerry James 2009-06-10 10:17:42 EDT --- The spec URL given in comment #3 shows the original spec file. The SRPM URL in the same comment gives me an HTTP 404. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:22:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101422.n5AEMnCh019697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 Tim Waugh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Tim Waugh 2009-06-10 10:22:48 EDT --- OK, 5.50-22.fc12 built with all suggestions applied. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:28:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:28:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101428.n5AESQen021232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #5 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-10 10:28:25 EDT --- Sorry 'bout that - I managed to do everything except upload the new versions. All should be good now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101432.n5AEWofD011555@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jerry James 2009-06-10 10:32:48 EDT --- Looks good. I can't wait to start wasting still more hours of my life on a rogue derivative. :-) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101446.n5AEkArK027277@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 --- Comment #4 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-10 10:46:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I reviewed this package. There are some issues, questions and suggestions that > I'll bring into your attention. > > * The latest version is not packaged! Please update to the latest version. Latest version is in devel > * The HACKING file should be packaged, possibly in the %doc of devel Done > ? The examples directory can go into the %doc of devel too. The code in examples are too complicated to be used stand-alone. > ? Some files in m4 and the file "missing" indicates GPLv2+ license.But I don't > think these make their way into the package, so I guess BSD is good enough. OK > * I don't think glib2-devel is required to build the package. I built an > identical package in mock without BR'in glib2-devel. Some of the examples > require glib2-devel. So if you are going to package those examples you'll need > to require glib2-devel in the devel subpackage. It's optional, but used. From configure.ac: PKG_CHECK_MODULES(GLIB, glib-2.0, HAVE_GLIB=yes, HAVE_GLIB=no) AC_SUBST(GLIB_LIBS) AC_SUBST(GLIB_CFLAGS) AC_ARG_ENABLE(glib, AC_HELP_STRING([--disable-glib],[disable usage of glib]), [case "${enableval}" in yes) HAVE_GLIB=yes ;; no) HAVE_GLIB=no ;; *) AC_MSG_ERROR(bad value ${enableval} for --disable-glib) ;; esac]) AM_CONDITIONAL(HAVE_GLIB, test "x$HAVE_GLIB" = "xyes") > * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a > directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that > directory. The directory %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/ is created but not owned. So > the devel package should require "gtk-doc" which is the rightful owner of that > directory. Done > ! Try to make use of the %{name} macro. Done in the few places where it makes sense. > * From the SPEC file: > # multi-jobbed make makes the build fail: > # ./build_prototypes_doc >liboilfuncs-doc.h > # /bin/sh: ./build_prototypes_doc: No such file or directory > make %{?_smp_mflags} > Isn't there a contradiction here? What is that commented-out section for? I removed the comment. > * From the SPEC file: > # Disable Altivec, so that liboil doesn't SIGILL on non-Altivec PPCs > # See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252179#c15 > #sed -i 's/CFLAGS="$CFLAGS "-maltivec""/CFLAGS="$CFLAGS "-fno-tree-vectorize > -Wa,-maltivec""/' configure > #sed -i 's/LIBOIL_CFLAGS -maltivec/LIBOIL_CFLAGS -fno-tree-vectorize > -Wa,-maltivec/' configure > Do we still need these lines in the SPEC file? Nope, removed. Should all be fixed in 0.3.16-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:50:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:50:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101450.n5AEoYYU016811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 10:50:34 EDT --- Uh, not so fast, I'll still do the review in full :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101454.n5AEsmr1029687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #24 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-10 10:54:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > I also noticed that there is one occurrence of rm that should be converted to > %{__rm} for macro consistency. Done (In reply to comment #7) > I did a full review on this package. Everything seems fine except > > * docs/mb_howto.txt should be included among %doc, or maybe in devel's %doc Done > * the examples directory should be included in devel's %doc Done > Other than these two things the package yields Fedora Guidelines. > > A question: Isn't it time to rename this package as libmusicbrainz2 and call > libmusicbrainz3 as libmusicbrainz? Is there a particular reason why this is not > done yet? This would be a pretty pointless shuffling of package names. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 14:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101454.n5AEscgt018054@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-10 10:54:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: slashem Short Description: Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic Owners: iarnell Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101506.n5AF6Ibo001537@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #29 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-10 11:06:15 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka, Just need I replace rename with mv? and %file should like this? %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes goocanvas.typemap maps README %{_bindir}/* %{_mandir}/man3/ %{_mandir}/man1/ %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:07:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:07:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101507.n5AF7IPd001689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 11:07:16 EDT --- rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ? - No license information available. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. N/A MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK I trust spot's legal opinion in the license issue, so the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:11:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:11:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101511.n5AFBeFT003352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Johan Cwiklinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Johan Cwiklinski 2009-06-10 11:11:39 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tuxmath Short Description: Educational math tutor for children Owners: trasher Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: trasher -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:12:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:12:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101512.n5AFCFbL003570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #13 from Sean Middleditch 2009-06-10 11:12:13 EDT --- No, my intention was to package 0.11.2. I just wasn't aware that running a make dist from the 0.11.2 branch was producing something different than what upstream put on their FTP servers; their SVN branch just isn't what was used to make that tarball. Not a biggie, I will just replace with upstream's official release and retest. For the AUTHORS file then, I would call iconv in the spec file... at which point? During install? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:14:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:14:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225794] Merge Review: ghostscript-fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101514.n5AFEsoj004154@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225794 --- Comment #15 from Tim Waugh 2009-06-10 11:14:53 EDT --- Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101538.n5AFcVWV011535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Rangeen Basu Roy Chowdhury changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505080 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:47:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:47:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101547.n5AFlIlK014281@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Philippe Makowski 2009-06-10 11:47:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flamerobin Short Description: database administration tool for Firebird DBMS based on wxgtk toolkit Owners: pmakowski Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101554.n5AFsB8C006980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-10 11:54:10 EDT --- 1] Source should be URL-like http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL 2] Summary would be nicer like "web/http testing tool" 3] no desktop file present http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#desktop 4] files duplicated http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles 5] why to have all files with 0755 permissions? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions 6] this application looks for me like dead, the latest version is from Jan 4, 2006. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 15:58:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:58:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101558.n5AFwTwB018088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Bug 504748 depends on bug 504746, which changed state. Bug 504746 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-PDF - Module for manipulating PDF files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504746 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-10 11:58:27 EDT --- Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403722 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:08:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:08:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101708.n5AH8awK008096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 13:08:35 EDT --- Thank you Bastien, There is this minor issue that is unfortunately a blocker: The "%doc HACKING" line must come after "defattr(-,root,root,-)" Please fix this so we can close the bug. Thanks again! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:16:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101716.n5AHGe1L032319@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #25 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 13:16:39 EDT --- Thanks! The %doc docs/mb_howto.txt examples/README.examples examples/*.c examples/*.cpp line must come after %defattr(-,root,root,-) Afaict this is the only outstanding issue left. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:21:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:21:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101721.n5AHLuF6001665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 --- Comment #26 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-10 13:21:56 EDT --- Done in -10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:20:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:20:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101720.n5AHKiGt011753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 --- Comment #6 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-10 13:20:42 EDT --- Done in -3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:25:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101725.n5AHP8T1013038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-10 13:25:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > For the AUTHORS file then, I would call iconv in the spec file... at which > point? During install? At %prep is the best. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:34:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:34:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101734.n5AHY1sH015273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #27 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 13:34:00 EDT --- Yay! All good. ------------------------------------------------------ This merge review (libmusicbrainz) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------------ Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226034] Merge Review: libmusicbrainz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101734.n5AHYFJ0005321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226034 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 17:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226036] Merge Review: liboil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101735.n5AHZueE016167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226036 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 13:35:55 EDT --- All issues have been addressed. Thanks for the updates. ---------------------------------------------- This merge review (liboil) is APPROVED by oget ---------------------------------------------- Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:14:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:14:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101814.n5AIEWOJ016521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #7 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-06-10 14:14:30 EDT --- I've updated the package again considering your remarks. Spec URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard.spec SRPM URL: http://fkooman.fedorapeople.org/proguard/proguard-4.3-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:17:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:17:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101817.n5AIHP9G017552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 Fran?ois Kooman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Fran?ois Kooman 2009-06-10 14:17:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: proguard Short Description: Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier Owners: fkooman Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101836.n5AIahOn022917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-10 14:36:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #29) > Just need I replace rename with mv? - Well, I don't know what you meant here, however the problem on the my comment 27 is that after "perl pure_install" the installed scripts are actually under %buildroot%_bindir, not under %_bindir > > and %file should like this? > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc Changes goocanvas.typemap maps README > %{_bindir}/* > %{_mandir}/man3/ > %{_mandir}/man1/ > %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/ - No. Still the directories %_mandir/man3 %_mandir/man1 %perl_verdorarch/auto _themselves_ are owned, which should not. Note: --------------------------------------------------- %files foo/ --------------------------------------------------- (where foo is a directory) means the directory foo/ itself and all files/directories/etc under foo/, while --------------------------------------------------- %files foo/* --------------------------------------------------- means all files/directories/etc under foo/ (if no hidden files are under foo/), but does not contain foo/ directory itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 18:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 14:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101852.n5AIqPj7006642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 14:52:23 EDT --- I'm done reviewing this. There are two minor issues to be resolved: - rpmlint is silent - There are certain files in the source, such as include/lcdf/hashmap.cc include/lcdf/vector.cc include/lcdf/clp.h liblcdf/string.cc liblcdf/error.cc liblcdf/vectorv.cc liblcdf/clp.c liblcdf/straccum.cc that are under MIT license. But since during the compilation, they are linked to GPL parts of the code, and since GPL is stricter than MIT, the overall license as GPLv2+ is acceptable. - koji rawhide build is fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1403904 * The directory %{_datadir}/lcdf-typetools/ is unowned! This needs attention. * Please include the COPYING file in %doc, as required by the guidelines. Please do these changes before you commit. ------------------------------------------------- This package (lcdf-typetools) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:07:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:07:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101907.n5AJ7Nkj011320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #69 from Stephen Lau 2009-06-10 15:07:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #67) ... Hey Tom, Thanks very much for the detailed reply and points... I'm bringing them up with our lawyers and execs to see what we can and can't address. I expect this will take a while (as anything involving management and/or legal seems to do), but just wanted to let you know I'm looking into it and not ignoring it. cheers, steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:05:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:05:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101905.n5AJ5LOr010687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #68 from Stephen Lau 2009-06-10 15:05:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > (In reply to comment #65) > > stuff just for Linux since it's entirely possible we could deliver binary-only > > components again in the future for Linux users. > > I don't want to get much involved with this review, but why not just let > gstreamer deal with the codecs mess? And if you want to provide some > binary-only codecs, why not to make repository of them and let PackageKit use > it as (optional of course) additional source of codecs? > > But, that's just off-topic to the issue of EULA. Sorry for the confusion, but I was talking about proprietary/binary-only add-ons (in the sense of Songbird add-ons which are like Firefox add-ons... packaged in .xpis, that augment the app by giving it new skins, or new functionality). The codecs themselves are all managed by GStreamer as you'd expect. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:22:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] New: Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Summary: Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/trac-peerreview-plugin.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/trac-peerreview-plugin-0.11-1.svn5357.fc11.src.rpm Description: A Distributed Peer-Review Plug-in for TRAC Project Management System. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101937.n5AJbJXA008954@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 15:37:18 EDT --- OK, this builds fine, the check section passes and the license clarification is fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 19:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906101953.n5AJrk0X025249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 15:53:45 EDT --- Looks good; the test suite runs fine: Ran 55 tests in 0.130s OK APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102002.n5AK2pVB015941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Dave Malcolm 2009-06-10 16:02:50 EDT --- Thanks New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-sqlparse Short Description: Non-validating SQL parser for Python Owners: dmalcolm Branches: InitialCC: (i.e. just for devel for now) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:20:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:20:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] New: Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Summary: Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora This is a tracker bug for Fedora Science and Technology related packages used instead of the wiki. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472639] Review Request: Scilab - Numerical Analysis toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102022.n5AKMxak001103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472639 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484386] Review Request: gri - A language for scientific illustration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102023.n5AKN1MG001162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484386 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470830] Review Request: open64 - The Open64 compiler suite (C, C++, Fortran) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102022.n5AKMwOw001039@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:22:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:22:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453703] Review Request: trilinos - A collection of libraries of numerical algorithms In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102022.n5AKMvUT001010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453703 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496742] Review Request: elfelli - Visualisation tool for flux lines In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102023.n5AKN3qg001221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496742 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102023.n5AKN4DL001249@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102022.n5AKMuTS000978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102023.n5AKN1uv001140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102023.n5AKN3vf001200@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102022.n5AKMrAo000858@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |451744(root), 453703, | |470830, 484386, 474787, | |472639, 489686, 496742, | |504430 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 16:22:52 EDT --- Adding existing trackers from the SciTech SIG page. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] New: Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Summary: Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sgrubb at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/libcap-ng/libcap-ng.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/libcap-ng/libcap-ng-0.4-1.src.rpm Description: Libcap-ng is a library that makes using posix capabilities easier and provides utilities to analyze your system for privileged apps. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102027.n5AKRvVu022451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102028.n5AKSh2p022650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|504424 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:29:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:29:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102029.n5AKT9lA022760@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504405 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102029.n5AKT8rM022738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:27:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:27:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102027.n5AKRvho022426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504424 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102028.n5AKShcQ022622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks|505154 | --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 16:28:42 EDT --- Whoops, copy paste error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:31:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:31:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102031.n5AKV0vm023446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #8 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-10 16:30:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > The spec contributed by Fabian is clearly based on my Mandriva spec (see, for > comparison, > http://svn.mandriva.com/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/packages/cooker/navit/current/SPECS/navit.spec?view=markup > ) - it would have been polite to acknowledge this in the submission, Fabian. Yes, your spec file provides some lines to the Fedora spec file, especially the patches. (In reply to comment #6) > forgot to mention, mine has some improvements over Fabian's, like dropping .la > files. In my spec file the following line takes care about the .la files find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';' as suggest in the Packaging guidelines. (In reply to comment #7) > btw, I think the -devel package is bogus...the 'libraries' are just plugins, > they shouldn't have been installed as shared libraries by navit in the first > place. they should only contain .so files (not .so.0.0.0 and .so.0) and these > should be in the main package(s). It's good to have versioned plugins ;-) I agree that they should go in the main packages. > I don't know why Fabian removed the split of different rendering engines from > my package. The reason they were split is to reduce dependencies - if you roll > them all together, as Fabian did, you have to have libqt4 installed to install > navit even if you have no intention of ever using the QT renderer. ditto cegui > etc. I can't remember why I did this...perhaps the reason is simple: Just misremember. My spec file is still in an early stage (see %file section). The intention was to build a working prototype and then do the cleaning. Aout the map: I personally see no reason to include a sample map because this blow the package size up and have only gain for a few users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102052.n5AKqxJv009432@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #18 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 16:52:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:54:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:54:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102054.n5AKsGYZ029479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 16:54:15 EDT --- CVS done. BTW, we pay no attention to "Cvsextras Commits" these days. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102055.n5AKtnSW030259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #26 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-10 16:55:43 EDT --- May I ask: Who is working on this package? juanucleus? Joseph? Kostas? Thomas? Jochen? I have a feeling that everybody is waiting for someone to step forward. If anyone points to a SPEC file that we can proceed from, I'd be grateful. There are a few SPEC files posted above but I don't know who want(s) to be the maintainer(s). Please don't be afraid to raise your hand. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:57:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:57:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102057.n5AKvxrO010716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 16:57:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 20:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102057.n5AKvIKs010606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 16:57:17 EDT --- CVS done. Note, branch names are like "F-11"; don't include characters like '&'. I cannot guarantee that the UTF-8 character made it all the way through the probably 20 tools that handled it on the way into the system, so please double-check -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102103.n5AL3JZn012098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #19 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-06-10 17:03:17 EDT --- Thanks Jason. Conrad - if you do need access to the EL-5 branch then just make the acl change request through pkgdb and I'll approve it straight away. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:06:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:06:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465372] Review Request: chntpw - Change passwords in Windows SAM files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102106.n5AL6ccv000759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465372 --- Comment #20 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-10 17:06:37 EDT --- Sure -- thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:07:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:07:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102107.n5AL7JWs000880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:07:18 EDT --- Did anyone notice that this package includes fonts, in contravention of our packaging guidelines, and indeed those fonts are exactly the ones that are already in the nethack package? The fonts should be split out into a single nethack-bitmap-fonts package, and both this package and nethack could then dispense with the symlinking games. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102108.n5AL8Cw6013424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:08:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102111.n5ALB9aO001986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:11:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:10:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:10:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102110.n5ALAUGv001866@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:10:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102109.n5AL9ekJ001342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #22 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:09:39 EDT --- I see no account "pmakowski" in the account system. Please correct, submit a new CVS request and set the fedora-cvs flag back to '?'. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:13:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:13:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102113.n5ALDfZT002710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #27 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-10 17:13:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > I tried building this and it failed saying it required perl-Verilog 3.2. You > might want to update this version in the build dependencies list. Also, is > perl-Verilog 3.2 rpm available? I only saw 3.12 in rawhide. Maybe I missed > it. F-9 and F-10 already have perl-Verilog 3.200. But perl-SystemC-Vregs failed to build for rawhide and F-11. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/perl-Verilog I'll look at it tomorrow before requesting cvs access for this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:17:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:17:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102117.n5ALHqlc016181@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-10 17:17:51 EDT --- Can I use this tracker for Electronic engineering apps as well ? (FEL related) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102127.n5ALREka006311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:26:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:26:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102126.n5ALQIDG006186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #8 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-10 17:26:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: R-msm Short Description: Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time Owners: denisarnaud Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102124.n5ALOUuq005557@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-10 17:24:29 EDT --- "Yes, your spec file provides some lines to the Fedora spec file, especially the patches." Well, yes, the fact that the comments and filenames are exactly the same was a bit of a giveaway ;). Also the fact that you took the string literal fix, which would usually never be noticed on Fedora because it's set to be a warning, not an error as it is in Mandriva. "In my spec file the following line takes care about the .la files find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'" Ah, sorry, missed that bit. "It's good to have versioned plugins ;-)" Not sure if you're serious or not there...there's usually no point versioning 'libraries' that are really private plugins for a certain app, because there's just no use case for it. I should ask upstream for clarification there. "Aout the map: I personally see no reason to include a sample map because this blow the package size up and have only gain for a few users." I like including it because, if you don't, if you run navit with a default configuration, you see...nothing. It looks like the app's broken. At least with the default map, when you run Navit with a default configuration, you see something, you know it works. (Does current SVN work for you, btw? I'd be interested to know.) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:26:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:26:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102126.n5ALQBvC018414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-10 17:26:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can I use this tracker for Electronic engineering apps as well ? (FEL related) Engineering is Technology, isn't it? :) Sure thing, everything that is related to science or technology should be tracked here (till the review has been accepted that is, I'm hoping people will be more active than in FE-NEEDSPONSOR which had umphty obsolete blockers). Less hassle in updating the wiki pages this way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:28:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:28:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102128.n5ALSWrT018756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-10 17:28:31 EDT --- Oh, I'm very sorry, we worry about UTF-8 stuff, but miss simple things like the "s" at the end of the package name. It seems I missed it while cut and pasting :( New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: senamirmir-washra-fonts Short Description: Fonts for the Ge?ez (Ethiopic) script Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:26:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:26:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102126.n5ALQ5E9018378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #8 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-10 17:26:04 EDT --- Thanks for your comments. I worked through them and changed things and added comments to the .spec file explaining why certain things are being done a particular way. Updated spec and package: ndoutils-1.4-0.1.b7.fc10.src.rpm http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/ndoutils-rpm/ What is now there is certainly better but two questions: 1) It contains a binary that now pulls in postgres and mysql libs: Is that an okay practice? Ideally a ndoutils-mysql package and an ndoutils-pgsql would be better but there is not an obvious method without building things twice and renaming the results from the first compile. What to do? 2) Is there a way to disable AutoReqProv just for the /usr/share/docs/nodutils-* ? There are some example scripts in there that should probably not pull in extra perl dependencies? Finally I need to check that postgres support actually works. Another build job: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404146 Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:32:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102132.n5ALWJIL007654@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:32:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:32:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102132.n5ALWKn4007688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498846 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:29:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:29:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102129.n5ALTIkY006684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |498845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102129.n5ALTHpA006655@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:34:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503617] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?__senamirmir-washra-fonts_?= =?utf-8?q?-_Fonts_for_the_Ge=CA=BCez_?= (Ethiopic) script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102134.n5ALYPtK020236@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503617 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:34:23 EDT --- CVS done. I'll get an admin to clean up the errant package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 21:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102138.n5ALcTUI021367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 17:38:27 EDT --- We're still several months away from making F-12 branches for anything. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500928] Review Request: python-sqlparse - Non-validating SQL parser for Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102201.n5AM1Kaq027142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500928 Dave Malcolm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Dave Malcolm 2009-06-10 18:01:19 EDT --- Built into devel (f12): http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404160 Closing as NEXTRELEASE; thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102204.n5AM4CFd027690@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 --- Comment #5 from Jesse Keating 2009-06-10 18:04:11 EDT --- rpmlint still takes issues with some of the files, what's going on with those? $ rpmlint ../Download/python-tw-jquery-0.9.4.4-1.fc12.noarch.rpm python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._ie.css python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._images python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/images/._wbg.gif python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/._flexigrid.css python-tw-jquery.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/css/flexigrid/images/._fhbg.gif python-tw-jquery.noarch: E: htaccess-file /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/tw/jquery/static/javascript/validate/demo/captcha/images/.htaccess -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:11:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:11:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] New: Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Summary: Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tuju at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec SRPM URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: xorriso is a program which maps file objects from POSIX compliant filesystems into Rock Ridge enhanced ISO 9660 filesystems and allows session-wise manipulation of such filesystems. It can load the management information of existing ISO images and it writes the session results to optical media or to filesystem objects. Vice versa xorriso is able to restore file objects from ISO 9660 filesystems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:16:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102216.n5AMGOuS018964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://scdbackup.sourceforg | |e.net/xorriso_eng.html --- Comment #1 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-10 18:16:23 EDT --- http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=xorriso http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404215 rpmlint passes. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:18:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:18:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102218.n5AMIDvM031100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL|http://scdbackup.sourceforg |http://scdbackup.sourceforg |e.net/xorriso_eng.html |e.net/xorriso_eng.html --- Comment #2 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-10 18:18:12 EDT --- I was planning to add RMB bindings to dolphin to extract .iso files to 'here' directory if that's possbile, but haven't looked it in detail yet. http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Creating_Konqueror_Service_Menus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102217.n5AMH4C7030912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Philippe Makowski 2009-06-10 18:17:03 EDT --- sorry for the typo New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: flamerobin Short Description: database administration tool for Firebird DBMS based on wxgtk toolkit Owners: makowski Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 22:47:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:47:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102247.n5AMlTSm026420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 18:47:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 23:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102308.n5AN8xZL011540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #28 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-10 19:08:58 EDT --- perl-Verilog-3.210-1.fc11 was missing in F-11 buildroot and ultimately the chainbuild failed. Aticket was filed https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/1921 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 23:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102314.n5ANE2Ff032603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 19:14:01 EDT --- Since the blockers are all closed, I tried building this again but it fails in rawhide due to lack of File::Spec >= 3.2701. I guess the core Perl package needs an update. Please clear the whiteboard when this package becomes buildable. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 23:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102326.n5ANQdGL003807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #9 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-10 19:26:38 EDT --- > 1) It contains a binary that now pulls in postgres and mysql libs: > Is that an okay practice? Ideally a ndoutils-mysql package and an > ndoutils-pgsql would be better but there is not an obvious method > without building things twice and renaming the results from > the first compile. What to do? > I guess in this case, the easiest would be to compile the module once for mysql and once for postgres, rename the modules, and put them in 2 sub-packages, so the packages only pull the deps for one of them. Or you may provide support for only one, not both, but someday someone will probably request support for the other. Maybe the real reviewer will have more insight than me on this issue. > 2) Is there a way to disable AutoReqProv just for the > /usr/share/docs/nodutils-* ? > There are some example scripts in there that should probably > not pull in extra perl dependencies? > Requires can be filtered, but what you really want is remove exec perms on the scripts, so they don't get parsed. This will clear a good chunk of the rpmlint errors below : ndoutils.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/upgradedb ndoutils.i386: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/rc.d/init.d/ndo2db ndoutils.i386: E: non-executable-script /etc/rc.d/init.d/ndo2db 0644 ndoutils.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/prepsql ndoutils.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.i386: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/installdb ndoutils.i386: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ndoutils ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/upgradedb perl(FindBin) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/installdb perl(FindBin) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/upgradedb /usr/bin/perl ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/installdb /usr/bin/perl ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/upgradedb perl(Getopt::Std) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/installdb perl(Getopt::Std) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/upgradedb perl(strict) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/installdb perl(strict) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/upgradedb perl(DBI) ndoutils.i386: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/ndoutils-1.4/db/installdb perl(DBI) ndoutils.i386: E: init-script-non-executable /etc/rc.d/init.d/ndo2db ndoutils.i386: W: missing-lsb-keyword Required-Stop in /etc/rc.d/init.d/ndo2db ndoutils.i386: W: no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/ndo2db ndoutils.i386: W: incoherent-init-script-name ndo2db ndoutils.src: W: strange-permission ndo2db.initd 0755 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 22 warnings. use 'rpmlint -I some-error' for more information. Don't bother for at least these 3, in this case, it's expected : ndoutils.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.i386: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/ndoutils nagios After that, you mostly need to work on the initscript and the package should then be in a reasonably good shape. Btw, the installation instructions want to put the conf file in the nagios conf dir (/etc/nagios). Have you considered doing this or do you want to keep the conf in their own subdir ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 10 23:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906102341.n5ANfVtn007534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #37 from Gareth John 2009-06-10 19:41:30 EDT --- I have changed the example package to use bindir as well as renamed the binary files. I do not get > "gtkmm-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > /usr/lib64/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']" on my rpmlint output for gtkmm-utils-devel rpm. Is there anything i can do to get this error up? Again only warning for any (s)rpm is in devel for no documentation. Files are http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-7.fc10.src.rpm http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 00:01:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:01:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110001.n5B01YjQ025268@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 20:01:33 EDT --- A few additional comments. Generally I would suggest that you run rpmlint on your packages and fix the obvious things. CeCILL-C_V1-*.txt need to be run through iconv. The file in ld.so.conf.d either shouldn't be marked %config or should be marked %config(noreplace). I don't think the user is supposed to edit it, so the former seems more correct to me. For some weird reason all of the libraries and executables end up mode 0775 for me. Do you see that? It could be a weird problem with my buildsystem, but I'm not sure. No parallel make? If it doesn't work, you should at least add a comment to that effect. Several of the executable names seem destined to conflict. For example, /usr/bin/gbase conflicts with http://www.hibernaculum.net/gbase/index.php which isn't in Fedora but which is in various other distros. /usr/bin/mtst conflict with the mt-st package in some distros (suse, for example), although Fedora seems to call the binary simply /usr/bin/mt. /usr/bin/gpart conflicts with the gpart package currently in Fedora (i586 only, though). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 01:14:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:14:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110114.n5B1EbvB012092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-10 21:14:36 EDT --- Tried to build this, but then realized that's not a src.rpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 02:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110201.n5B21KG1014365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #31 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-10 22:01:18 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka I updated a new SRPM. SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.05-6.fc10.src.rpm Is it OK? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 04:02:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:02:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110402.n5B42sgS018345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Parag changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Parag 2009-06-11 00:02:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! I will take care those issues at time of cvs import. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lcdf-typetools Short Description: The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts Owners: pnemade Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 04:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502991] Review Request: erlang-erlsom - Support for XML Schema in Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110420.n5B4K32p023060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502991 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-11 00:20:01 EDT --- Oops! http://peter.fedorapeople.org/erlang-erlsom-1.2.1-3.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 05:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110520.n5B5KI6i018741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 --- Comment #9 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-11 01:20:17 EDT --- Gah! I must need new spectacles. I even mentioned "fonts" and it didn't click. Will get in touch with Luke to arrange something and hold off with this for a while. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 05:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502918] Review Request: eggdbus - Experimental D-Bus bindings for GObject In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110539.n5B5dZne011038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502918 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-11 01:39:34 EDT --- packages have been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 05:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 01:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502919] Review Request: polkit - PolicyKit Authorization Framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110540.n5B5eBrH023466@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502919 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #14 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-11 01:40:10 EDT --- packages have been built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 06:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110631.n5B6VgCo024212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #38 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 02:31:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #37) > I have changed the example package to use bindir as well as renamed the binary > files. I do not get > "gtkmm-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > > /usr/lib64/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']" on my rpmlint output for gtkmm-utils-devel rpm. Is there anything i can do to get this error up? As Mamoru said, (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #4) > > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm > > gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > > /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > > gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > > /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > > - Would you check if you have surely redhat-rpm-config installed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 06:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110646.n5B6kpgd028755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |494845 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 06:46:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:46:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110646.n5B6koMU028725@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 06:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110650.n5B6ohn3010588@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 02:50:43 EDT --- perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-1.00-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-1.00-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 06:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 02:54:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110654.n5B6sghw031137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-11 02:54:41 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110701.n5B71oDL001367@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 --- Comment #6 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-11 03:01:48 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-PDF-Reuse Short Description: Reuse and mass produce PDF documents Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110701.n5B71r3l014284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110708.n5B78C75015842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 03:08:11 EDT --- flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:08:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:08:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110708.n5B78I02015936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 03:08:17 EDT --- flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:16:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:16:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110716.n5B7GGnn018194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Philippe Makowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110727.n5B7Rgiu020830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tmraz at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tmraz at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 07:50:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:50:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110750.n5B7oHlG013547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #3 from David Hannequin 2009-06-11 03:50:15 EDT --- Hi, I take into account your remarks and I put a new spec file. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110819.n5B8J38H022908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #3 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-11 04:19:02 EDT --- f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404730 f12 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404608 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110800.n5B80SuL016533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 04:00:25 EDT --- cvs done Summary should not repeat package name - suggest "Tools for manipulating OpenType fonts". Also added fonts-sig to cc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110849.n5B8nocT012734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Tomas Mraz 2009-06-11 04:49:49 EDT --- 1. www.web-insights.net does not resolve for me. 2. There is no URL on Source0. 3. The COPYING file is GPLv2 but the library sources are LGPLv2.1+. As you're the upstream, please add also the LGPLv2.1 text in the original tarball. 4. There is missing rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT on the beginning of %install. 5. The symlink libcap-ng.so in the -devel subpackage should be in %{_libdir} not /%{_lib}/ rpmlint is silent: $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-debuginfo-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-devel-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-devel.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4-1.src.rpm libcap-ng.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-utils-0.4-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-utils.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:53:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:53:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] New: Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Summary: Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tuju at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp.spec SRPM URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/python-utmp-0.7-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: python-utmp consists of three modules, providing access to utmp records. It is quite difficult to access utmp record portably, because every UNIX has different structure of utmp files. Currently, python-utmp works on platforms which provide getutent, getutid, getutline, pututline, setutent, endutent and utmpname functions (such as GNU systems (Linux and hurd) and System V unices) and on BSD systems using simple utmp structure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:55:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110855.n5B8twkd002609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #1 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-11 04:55:57 EDT --- $ rpmlint python-utmp.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. f10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404809 f11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404815 f12 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404820 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110857.n5B8v6v3015228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #2 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-11 04:57:05 EDT --- http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/python-utmp.html Only fishy part in this package is the license, which also have given one error in debian side. It appears to be free enough, but doesn't follow any well known named license. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 08:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 04:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] New: Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Summary: Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch/perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch/perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Exception::Class::TryCatch provides syntactic sugar for use with Exception::Class using the familiar keywords try and catch. Its primary objective is to allow users to avoid dealing directly with $@ by ensuring that any exceptions caught in an eval are captured as Exception::Class objects, whether they were thrown objects to begin with or whether the error resulted from die. This means that users may immediately use isa and various Exception::Class methods to process the exception. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505264] New: Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505264 Summary: Review Request: wb_builder - Wishbone Bus Builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/wb_builder.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/wb_builder-1.0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package includes a HDL generator from a text description or via GUI input for the Wishbone Bus. The Wishbone Bus is an open source hardware computer bus intended to let the parts of an integrated circuit communicate with each other. The aim is to allow the connection of differing cores to each other inside of a chip. The Wishbone Bus is used by many designs in the OpenCores project. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110911.n5B9Bww4020188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-11 05:11:56 EDT --- so how is this different from http://www.clapper.org/software/python/pyutmp/ ? If pyutmp seems latest development module, can you replace python-utmp with pytmp here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:15:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:15:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110915.n5B9FwSH021618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #12 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-11 05:15:57 EDT --- Ping ? can you request a CVS request ? as mentioned in https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/19 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:21:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:21:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110921.n5B9LbnN010799@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110921.n5B9L0hL023341@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #29 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-11 05:20:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-SystemPerl Short Description: SystemPerl Perl module Owner chitlesh Branches: F-10 F11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110927.n5B9RPJv025723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://kassiopeia.juls.savb | |a.sk/~garabik/software/pyth | |on-utmp/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110936.n5B9aae3015840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Juha Tuomala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |python-utmp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 09:36:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 05:36:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906110936.n5B9aDjC015748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 --- Comment #4 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-11 05:36:11 EDT --- Good question, we have been using this one at work. http://kassiopeia.juls.savba.sk/~garabik/software/python-utmp/README.txt vs http://www.clapper.org/software/python/pyutmp/epydoc/ For me it looks that python-utmp has richer API, including setting utmp records (pututline etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 10:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111008.n5BA8XbC026265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 06:08:31 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff output looks good Zach there should only be one %changelog with all the changelog entries ghc-utf8-string.src: W: more-than-one-%changelog-section 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. You can look at some other active spec files for examples if you're unsure about the format. You probably need a fedora packager sponsor? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 10:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111036.n5BAaio0002013@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-11 06:36:41 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404843 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4e1f5b7f716e0bd357e010c9a4a0c6c34f943045 Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=45, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.00 sys + 0.05 cusr 0.01 csys = 0.10 CPU) + Package perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Exception::Class::TryCatch) = 1.12 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Remove unnecessary BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.005 APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 10:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111039.n5BAdCZQ002819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 06:39:10 EDT --- A couple of notes: - Doesn't %configure --disable-static disable building the static library? - Normally, you don't need to mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_mandir}/{man3,man8} mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib} as make install will do this for you. Also, you need to rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the beginning of %install. - You shouldn't need to define attributes in %files. If the attributes are not correct, the Makefile should be adjusted to give 644 for normal files and 755 for libraries and binaries (or set the attributes using chmod in %install). - Time stamps are not preserved, use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 10:42:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:42:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111042.n5BAgZKO017030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #39 from Gareth John 2009-06-11 06:42:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > (In reply to comment #37) > > I have changed the example package to use bindir as well as renamed the binary > > files. I do not get > "gtkmm-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath > > > /usr/lib64/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 ['/usr/lib64']" on my rpmlint output for gtkmm-utils-devel rpm. Is there anything i can do to get this error up? > > As Mamoru said, > > (In reply to comment #6) > > (In reply to comment #4) > > > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-1.fc10.i386.rpm > > > gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > > > /usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > > > gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object > > > /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 > > > > - Would you check if you have surely redhat-rpm-config installed? With regards to this i have redhat-rpm-config installed i got this warning at the begining of this process and i have already fixed it, hence i chmod the files with +x (755). This is no longer an error FOR ME! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 10:51:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:51:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111051.n5BApE13019689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-11 06:51:13 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1404840 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ef13c2a01755a1a52fa0669db5c381d4651427fe Config-Auto-0.20.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=11, Tests=39, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.03 sys + 0.73 cusr 0.11 csys = 0.95 CPU) + Package perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Config::Auto) = 0.20 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Config::IniFiles) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Drop following Requires as yum will going to resolve it automatically. Requires: perl(Config::IniFiles) Requires: perl(Test::More) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:04:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:04:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111104.n5BB4i0R010074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-11 07:04:43 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405028 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. Should: 1) use %global instead %define APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:26:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:26:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111126.n5BBQNKx030329@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:26:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:26:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111126.n5BBQ1vt030165@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-11 07:26:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-peerreview-plugin Short Description: Framework for realtime code review within Trac Owner chitlesh Branches: F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111136.n5BBatFc019346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505017 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111136.n5BBauMf019370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:43:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:43:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111143.n5BBhAZG020893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #40 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 07:43:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #39) > With regards to this i have redhat-rpm-config installed i got this warning at > the begining of this process and i have already fixed it, hence i chmod the > files with +x (755). This is no longer an error FOR ME! Okay, but the problem is still there (gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-7.fc10.src.rpm) and you need to fix it before I can approve the package. Did you try building in mock? Look at #32 for advice on preventing rpath. Also, as I said in #32, I don't think you should branch the documentation into -doc since it's small in size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:52:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:52:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] New: Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 Summary: Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: dmach at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://dan.steadynet.org/kobo.spec SRPM URL: http://dan.steadynet.org/kobo-0.1.0-1.el5.src.rpm (both addresses are temporary, project will be hosted on fedorahosted.org) Description: Kobo is set of python modules designed for rapid tools development. It implements hub-worker-client architecture, plugins, enhanced option parser, etc... It is originally an internal Red Hat project which is being opensourced. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 11:53:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 07:53:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111153.n5BBrBc2023964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mmaslano at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:02:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:02:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111202.n5BC2Fhc026885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-06-11 08:02:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mcu8051ide Short Description: IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers Owners: shakthimaan chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111201.n5BC1qht007475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #10 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-11 08:01:50 EDT --- Thanks again. Another update ndoutils.spec and ndoutils-1.4-0.2.b7.fc10.src.rpm http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/ndoutils-rpm rpmlint shows as below. I've tried to explain each of the warnings, for me they are all justified. 1) ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/ndoutils nagios ndoutils.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/cache/ndoutils nagios These 3 are expected, nagios user executed processes write to these. 2) ndoutils.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/ndoutils ndo2db does its own rotation and has a max log size in its configuration. 3) ndoutils.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name ndo2db ndoutils packages contains ndomod and ndo2db utilities. Only the latter is the init.d thing to be started. 4) ndoutils-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation ndoutils-pgsql.x86_64: W: no-documentation Both packages require ndoutils anyway which does contain the docs. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:03:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:03:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111203.n5BC3Up4007833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 --- Comment #1 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-11 08:03:29 EDT --- OK rpmlint on every package. OK name of package accords to the Naming Guidelines. OK spec file name match the base package %{name}. OK package meet the Packaging Guidelines. OK package has a good license. OK spec file is written in American English. OK spec file for the package must be legible. ? The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source. OK successful koji compilation. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405135 OK correct BuildRequires, Requires. OK proper use of %find_lang macro. OK shared library must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK relocatable package must state this fact. OK package must own their directories. OK permissions on files must be set properly. OK %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK consistent use of macros. OK package contains code, or permissable content. OK large documentation go in a -doc subpackage. OK %doc must not affect the runtime of the application. OK header files must be in a -devel package. OK static libraries must be in a -static package. OK pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK library files with a suffix (.so) must go in -devel. OK usually devel packages must require the base package. OK Remove .la libtool archives. OK GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file. OK %install section starts with rm -rf %{buildroot}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:05:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:05:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111205.n5BC5TU4008677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 --- Comment #2 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-11 08:05:27 EDT --- You should provide the source code tar ball somewhere. Because a reviewer has to check ,if srpm has matching source with upstream source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:09:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:09:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111209.n5BC9bH5030167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Mach 2009-06-11 08:09:36 EDT --- I am the upstream, latest tarball is included in the srpm. Package will be placed on fedorahosted.org as soon as I have the project created. Can't we skip this item in the checklist? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111210.n5BCAOXT030888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-11 08:10:23 EDT --- ACCEPT -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111221.n5BCL9dj001819@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 Daniel Mach changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Daniel Mach 2009-06-11 08:21:08 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kobo Short Description: Python modules for tools development Owners: dmach Branches: F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:20:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111220.n5BCKwAr001765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 08:20:57 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:21:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:21:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111221.n5BCLqfV013443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #11 from Xavier Bachelot 2009-06-11 08:21:51 EDT --- Well done, the spec looks much better now. One last thing, the perms mod on the examples should be done in the %prep section, not at the end of %install. Also, what about putting the confs in /etc/nagios rather than /etc/ndoutils ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:36:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:36:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111236.n5BCaWjQ017957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 08:36:32 EDT --- rpmlint output: xorriso.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/xorriso.pc xorriso.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xorriso-0.3.8/CONTRIBUTORS 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. - I have no idea why a pkgconfig file is provided, usually they're only used in development packages such as libraries. - Drop the CONTRIBUTORS file and add [ -s CONTRIBUTORS ] && exit 1 to %setup so that you will be notified if the file gains content later on. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. NEEDSWORK - Change Release: 1%{?dist} to Release: 1.%{__patchlevel}%{?dist} MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is GPLv2 and GPL+ and (LGPLv2+ or MIT), not GPLv2. * Most of the files are under GPLv2. * cleanup is under GPL license (GPL+) * make_isohybrid_mr is LGPLv2+ or MIT. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK - No source URL provided. Source matches upstream. MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Time stamps are not preserved, use make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. N/A MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. NEEDSWORK - Add Requires: pkgconfig. MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK - Not all licenses are included. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:39:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:39:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111239.n5BCdWpk007083@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #3 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-11 08:39:31 EDT --- wrt to comment #1 item 1, power supply on that server burned up and hasn't been replaced. Updated the spec file to point to my people page for now. Items 2-4 are also fixed. For item 5, all example rpms that I looked at have the .so file in /lib64 if the library is there also. Is there a guideline that says this is wrong or something bad that will happen if I don't? IOW, what are the problems caused by leaving it in /lib64? wrt to comment #2 item 1, No. Item 2 is fixed. Item 3, I like explicit attributes so that when I look at the specfile I know exactly how everything is going to land just in case there is a mistake in the make files. (I can point to bz on the prelude stack where explicit perms would have prevented doing security errata.) Item 5, I don't see any spec files doing this. Why would build-time timestamps be important? I can see the reason for multilib timestamp coordination for shared resources, but why would I need to do this? Thanks for the review comments. I posted a new spec file to the same place as above, but won't update the srpm until later today after I put some man pages in the tarball and do an official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111257.n5BCvKOd013136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #5 from Tomas Mraz 2009-06-11 08:57:19 EDT --- In the new spec there is a typo in Source0 URL and extra space at the end of the %configure line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 12:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111253.n5BCrqUX011947@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 08:53:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > wrt to comment #1 item 1, power supply on that server burned up and hasn't been > replaced. Updated the spec file to point to my people page for now. Items 2-4 > are also fixed. For item 5, all example rpms that I looked at have the .so file > in /lib64 if the library is there also. Is there a guideline that says this is > wrong or something bad that will happen if I don't? IOW, what are the problems > caused by leaving it in /lib64? That's not a standard location according to FHS. You have been looking only at some core utilities spec files, everything else installs the libraries in %{_libdir}. Using %{_lib} for anything else is forbidden. > wrt to comment #2 item 1, No. Item 2 is fixed. Item 3, I like explicit > attributes so that when I look at the specfile I know exactly how everything is > going to land just in case there is a mistake in the make files. (I can point > to bz on the prelude stack where explicit perms would have prevented doing > security errata.) But the normal umasks set by the build environment are fine. > Item 5, I don't see any spec files doing this. Why would > build-time timestamps be important? I can see the reason for multilib timestamp > coordination for shared resources, but why would I need to do this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps It's a guideline and thus mandatory. Files that aren't generated in the build (e.g. the header file) need to keep their time stamps. This package will also be multilib, won't it? > Thanks for the review comments. I posted a new spec file to the same place as > above, but won't update the srpm until later today after I put some man pages > in the tarball and do an official release. You didn't increment the release, which you should do whenever making revisions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:01:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:01:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111301.n5BD1RVn014646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #6 from Tomas Mraz 2009-06-11 09:01:26 EDT --- Jussi, note that the version is bumped so release doesn't have to be. And the library itself should stay in /lib{64,} because the system core utilities will depend on it. The question is only about the devel symlink. Also the timestamps guideline is not a strict guideline - note the 'consider' word in the guideline and so on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:04:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111304.n5BD4SGt015718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #27 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-11 09:04:21 EDT --- I'm not yet that familiar with creating SPECs, but am free to help this getting packaged. Juanucleus patch is needed, in order the true type fonts to replace, because they are not allowed to get shipped in fedora? That's probably the main reason nothing is habbening here ;-) Thomas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:25:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111325.n5BDPnek022617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 09:25:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Jussi, note that the version is bumped so release doesn't have to be. OK, I hadn't noticed that. > And the library itself should stay in /lib{64,} because the system core > utilities will depend on it. The question is only about the devel symlink. Okay, in that case, my bad. However, Tomas is right; there are quite a few .so files in %{_lib}. > Also the timestamps guideline is not a strict guideline - note the 'consider' > word in the guideline and so on. Yes, but it's trivial and doesn't hurt anything to keep them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:29:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:29:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111329.n5BDTCr2001823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 09:29:11 EDT --- Oh, the permission lines %defattr(-,root,root) should AFAIK be %defattr(-,root,root,-) as per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Permissions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111331.n5BDVc28024412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #7 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-11 09:31:33 EDT --- hello, I worked on the .spec file to adress these issues. see http://people.fedoraproject.org/~dnovotny/review/mailman.spec these are my changes: * hardcoded library path changed to %{_libdir} * mixed use of spaces and tabs fixed * added --libdir=%{_libdir} to configure * fixed URL to tarball * permission of source files changed to 0644 (no strange-permission warnings on .src.rpm) * got rid of "file listed twice" warnings: listing the files explicitly the source files permission changes can't be seen in the .spec, I had to do it in the cvs checkout as for the permission and setgid warnings, I guess mailman needs them that way. Also the incoherent-subsys warnings can be ignored because "It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'" which is exactly the case. Do you think that's all, or do I have to fix something more? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495692] Review Request: tslib - Touchscreen Access Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111351.n5BDpYhE030842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495692 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-11 09:51:32 EDT --- Thx for the review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 13:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494219] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111351.n5BDpicc030916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494219 Paul Howarth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |paul at city-fan.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |paul at city-fan.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth 2009-06-11 09:51:42 EDT --- Thanks for packaging this up. I've used this package to set up my own trac instance using mod_fcgid and it all seems to be working fine. I've documented the process here: http://www.city-fan.org/tips/TracWithFastCGIonFedora Anyway, I'll now return the favour by reviewing this package for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 14:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460044] Review Request: pssh - Parallel SSH tools In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111450.n5BEoEDS032381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460044 Patrick Laughton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at jima.tk --- Comment #7 from Patrick Laughton 2009-06-11 10:50:12 EDT --- [x] Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. I take it you overlooked /usr/bin/pscp owned by putty for five years prior? BZ#485969 BZ#472617 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 14:58:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:58:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111458.n5BEwuwN002797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #9 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-11 10:58:54 EDT --- ok, new spec file uploaded to same place. Wrt to timestamp issue, the suggested fix doesn't work. The symlink was moved. The typos are fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 15:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494219] Review Request: trac-accountmanager-plugin - Account manager plugin for trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111509.n5BF9Yp1006420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494219 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth 2009-06-11 11:09:33 EDT --- Review Guidelines ================= - rpmlint clean - package name is OK and is consistent with existing trac plugin packages in Fedora - spec file name consistent with package name - package meets guidelines - Beerware license is OK for Fedora - correct "Copyright only" License field used in spec - no detached license file to include - spec file written in English and is legible - source pulling instructions are missing "-r" option to set svn revision - sources from SRPM match sources from upstream VCS - package builds OK in mock for Fedora 10 (x86_64) - buildreqs fine - no locale data, libs, or devel files to worry about - not relocatable - directory ownership is fine - no duplicate entries in %files list - %defattr(...) and %clean present and correct - macro usage is consistent - code, not content - no large docs (in fact hardly any docs at all!) - docs don't affect runtime - not a GUI app, no .desktop file needed - %install section properly cleans buildroot - filenames all valid UTF-8 - no scriptlets needed - package appears to work as advertised - no subpackages used - no file dependencies Notes ===== Perhaps add comment that python-setuptools runtime dependency is needed for pkg_resources import? Please include contrib/sessionstore_convert.py as %doc (see http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/trac-users at googlegroups.com/msg03696.html) Please add -r $svnrel to svn export instructions -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 15:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111516.n5BFGoVo031621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #11 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-11 11:16:48 EDT --- Spec files have been fixed. I do need a sponsor as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 15:46:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:46:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111546.n5BFk9OO021555@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla 2009-06-11 11:46:08 EDT --- Better. I still get mailman.src:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name} A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. mailman.src:131: W: configure-without-libdir-spec A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script supports it. mailman.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 63, tab: line 132) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. On the SRPM. There's a *TON* of rpmlint errors on the RPM, mostly perm and gid issues. Some are not. The only ones that concern me are these: Lots of: mailman.i386: E: file-in-usr-marked-as-conffile /usr/lib/mailman/templates/zh_TW/userpass.txt A file in /usr is marked as being a configuration file. Store your conf files in /etc/ instead. mailman.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre rm mailman.i386: W: dangerous-command-in-%post rm mailman.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailman $prog The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the script manually. mailman.i386: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailman $prog The filename of your lock file in /var/lock/subsys/ is incoherent with your actual init script name. For example, if your script name is httpd, you have to use 'httpd' as the filename in your subsys directory. It is also possible that rpmlint gets this wrong, especially if the init script contains nontrivial shell variables and/or assignments. These cases usually manifest themselves when rpmlint reports that the subsys name starts a with '$'; in these cases a warning instead of an error is reported and you should check the script manually. mailman.i386: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/mailman The service is enabled by default after "chkconfig --add"; for security reasons, most services should not be. Use "-" as the default runlevel in the init script's "chkconfig:" line and/or remove the "Default-Start:" LSB keyword to fix this if appropriate for this service. All need fixing. Still present from #3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 15:53:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:53:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505354] New: Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 Summary: Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-captchaphp-2.0-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This PHP script provides a very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution. You can easily embed it into your
generation scripts to prevent spambot access. It strives to be accessible and implements an arithmetic riddle as alternative for visually impaired users. It does not require cookies, but makes use of "AJAX" to give users visual feedback for solving the CAPTCHA. It grants access fuzzily (when single letters were misguessed) instead of frustrating people. And it is rather customizable. rpmlint output: none koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405513 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:00:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:00:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] New: Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 Summary: Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-PHPMailer.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-PHPMailer-5.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: PHP email transport class featuring file attachments, SMTP servers, CCs, BCCs, HTML messages, word wrap, and more. Sends email via sendmail, PHP mail(), QMail, or with SMTP. rpmlint output: none koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405528 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:05:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:05:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] New: Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 Summary: Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-hkit.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/php-hkit-0.5-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: hKit is a simple toolkit for extracting common microformats from a page. The page can be presented as a string or a URL, and the result is handed back as a standard PHP array structure. hKit uses SimpleXML for parsing, and therefore requires PHP5. Designed for humans first and machines second, microformats are a set of simple, open data formats built upon existing and widely adopted standards. The only microformat module currently supported by hKit is hCard. However, hKit makes possible for a user to write its own microformat module. rpmlint output: none koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405534 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505360] New: Review Request: JSCookMenu - Javascript GUI-like web menus Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: JSCookMenu - Javascript GUI-like web menus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505360 Summary: Review Request: JSCookMenu - Javascript GUI-like web menus Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pm at datasphere.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/JSCookMenu.spec SRPM URL: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/JSCookMenu-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: JSCookMenu is a powerful menu script written in JavaScript that can mimic complex menus found in popular GUI Applications. It is relatively simple and easy to use. Creating a new theme requires some patience, but rarely does one has to write one since some good ones are provided. The following features are implemented: * Supports both horizontal and vertical menus. * Supports relative positioning. * Supports different menus with different themes in the same web page. * Eases the menu creation process with a menu builder. * Special effects such as sliding and fading in/out is available. * APIs for JavaScript developers. rpmlint output: JSCookMenu.noarch: W: no-documentation --> No documentation files provided in the upstream tarball. The MIT-compatible license text is in script comment. koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405548 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:16:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505354] Review Request: php-captchaphp - PHP very user-friendly CAPTCHA solution In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111616.n5BGGfPp019942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505354 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-06-11 12:16:40 EDT --- Please note that the original (public domain) tarball includes a font with an incompatible license: the package removes this font, requires the dejavu fonts and uses those as a default replacement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:28:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:28:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111628.n5BGSNrv023686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #32 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 12:28:22 EDT --- For 0.05-6: - The directory %{perl_vendorarch}/Goo/ should be owned by this package as currently no package owns this directory. - By the way it seems that latest version is 0.06. Would you upgrade your srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:36:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:36:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491430] Review Request: sslogger - A keystroke logging utility for privileged user escalation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111636.n5BGa2ev026626@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491430 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 12:35:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #25) > Any one care to suggest a new name for sl before i pick one out of the hat > > -Ed Maybe %_bindir/slog or so? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:52:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:52:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471231] Review Request: WebCalendar - Single/multi-user web-based calendar application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111652.n5BGqaqM031686@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471231 --- Comment #5 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-06-11 12:52:34 EDT --- New SRPM: http://monnerat.fedorapeople.org/WebCalendar-1.2.0-5.fc12.src.rpm _ hkit unbundled. php-hkit (review request 505358) required _ PHPMailer unbundled. php-PHPMailer (review request 505356) required _ captcha unbundled. php-captchaphp (review request 505354) required _ JSCookMenu unbundled. JSCookMenu (review request 505360) required koji scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405564 rpmlint output: WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.smtp.php /usr/share/php/class.smtp.php WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php apache WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-readable /etc/WebCalendar/settings.php 0660 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/hKit/hkit.class.php /usr/share/php/hkit.class.php WebCalendar.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /etc/WebCalendar apache WebCalendar.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/WebCalendar 0775 WebCalendar.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/WebCalendar/includes/classes/phpmailer/class.phpmailer.php /usr/share/php/class.phpmailer.php New warnings (i.e.: dangling-symlinks) are symbolic links to files in the required packages mentioned above. _ I did not contact Ray Jones, since its captcha updates are now deleted from the package. _ There are still files in the menu subdir: these are WebCalendar-specific menu themes for JSCookMenu. _ Everaldo's icons are retained for now: they are used by the specific menu themes. I left a question at WebCalendar's forum about icons licensing (https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3299158&forum_id=11587), but I have no answer yet. _ There is still a module I have tried to unbundle: popups.php. It uses some Javascript code (infobox.js) from Klaus Knopper's web site (http://www.knopper.net), but although this original code is GPL2, it has never been publicly released (there is no home page for this script: it is only accessible as a part of Knopper's site). In addition, both versions have been changed in incompatible ways. Thus unbundling this code and making it a maintainable package is hardly feasible: I suggest we live with it as now. _ Unbundling captchaphp was a pain the the ass, because it was not initially intended to be used this way ! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 16:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481523] Review Request: rubygem-trollop - A command-line option parsing library for ruby. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111655.n5BGtXOq000536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481523 --- Comment #2 from Wesley Tanaka 2009-06-11 12:55:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=347439) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347439) add rubygem-hoe dependency rpmbuild --rebuild rubygem-trollop-1.10.2-0.fc10.src.rpm (and also on rubygem-ditz-0.5-0.fc10.src.rpm) produces this error: rake aborted! no such file to load -- hoe The error (both for trollop and ditz) went away after running yum install rubygem-hoe so I think this change might be needed to the .spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:01:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:01:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111701.n5BH1JLw002233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-11 13:01:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111702.n5BH2GjN012789@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-11 13:02:14 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111703.n5BH3mac013143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-11 13:03:47 EDT --- Please stick to the CVS request format; it saves manual work by your friendly CVS admin. CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111704.n5BH4cfw003260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-11 13:04:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:05:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:05:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505293] Review Request: kobo - python modules for tools development In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111705.n5BH5NiO013851@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505293 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-11 13:05:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] New: Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 Summary: Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: esandeen at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec & src.rpm at: http://sandeen.fedorapeople.org/nilfs-utils/ Description: Userspace utilities for creating and mounting NILFS v2 filesystems. (nilfs is a new upstream filesystem, enabled in rawhide, having userspace around might be nice) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:29:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:29:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111729.n5BHTs1E010772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 Patrick Laughton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jima at jima.tk --- Comment #10 from Patrick Laughton 2009-06-11 13:29:50 EDT --- Is my environment screwed up, or is autopoint looking for `cvs` during the build process? I've tried both of your SRPMs to the same result. Adding a BR leads to some sort of automake fun. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111731.n5BHVV0A021649@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 13:31:30 EDT --- Okay. - This package itself is now okay. - Fedora requests a people who needs to be sponsored to either submit another review request or do a pre-review of other person's review request to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Now you already submitted several other review request and from a quick look they are well packaged to some extent. ------------------------------------------------------------ This package (lazygal) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------ Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Get a Fedora Account". After you request for sponsorship a mail will be sent to sponsor members automatically (which is invisible for you) which notifies that you need a sponsor. After that, please also write on this bug for confirmation that you requested for sponsorship and your FAS (Fedora Account System) name. Then I will sponsor you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:43:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111743.n5BHhUvO025011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 13:43:29 EDT --- libiodbc-3.52.6-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libiodbc-3.52.6-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111741.n5BHfmrk024570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |libiodbc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111742.n5BHgquF015120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 13:42:51 EDT --- libiodbc-3.52.6-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libiodbc-3.52.6-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111748.n5BHmucF026864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Louis Lagendijk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 17:47:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 13:47:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111747.n5BHlRJO026459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #15 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-11 13:47:25 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: cups-bjnp Short Description: CUPS backend for the Canon BJNP network printers Owners: llagendijk Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 18:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111815.n5BIFpU3003713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #49 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-11 14:15:48 EDT --- Thanks. I have built it for F10. yafaray is still running fine with blender 2.49. At least one user acknowledged that yafaray rpms are working: http://www.yafaray.org/community/forum/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=2257 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 18:46:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 14:46:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111846.n5BIkNmk002994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #10 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-11 14:46:22 EDT --- New srpm has been uploaded to: http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/libcap-ng/libcap-ng-0.4.1-1.src.rpm Please let me know if there are any other issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111902.n5BJ2bsY017126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-11 15:02:34 EDT --- Ping. Any news here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111915.n5BJFe4A020791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #41 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 15:15:39 EDT --- Well, binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath rpmlint issue is completely different from unstripped-binary-or-object rpmlint issue. While the latter one can usually be fixed by installing redhat-rpm-config (as I said before), the formar one usually needs some code fix. Note that in many cases binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath rpmlint warnings can occur on x86_64/ppc64 but not on i386/ppc. When you add "/usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths" at the end of %install, the result is: - i586: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405628 - x86_64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405624 Here actually only on x86_64 libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0 has rpath. There are several ways to fix this issue. A. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Removing_Rpath B. I usually do -------------------------------------------------- %prep %setup -q sed -i.rpath -e \ '/sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec/s|/usr/lib |/usr/lib /usr/lib64 /lib /lib64 |' \ configure -------------------------------------------------- The result of B is: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405800 By the way "BR: graphviz" may be missing as build.log contains may lines like: -------------------------------------------------- Building full member lists recursively... Adding membsh: dot: command not found Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"classGtk_1_1EntryCompletion__inherit__graph.dot" -Tpng -o "classGtk_1_1EntryCompletion__inherit__graph.png"' sh: dot: command not found Problems running dot: exit code=127, command='dot', arguments='"classGtk_1_1EventBox__inherit__graph.dot" -Tpng -o "classGtk_1_1EventBox__inherit__graph.png"' -------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:20:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:20:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111920.n5BJKv5P022416@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 15:20:56 EDT --- perl-SystemPerl-1.321-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SystemPerl-1.321-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111921.n5BJLY5u022684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 15:21:33 EDT --- perl-SystemPerl-1.321-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-SystemPerl-1.321-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:24:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:24:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503256] Review Request: gtkmm-utils - C++ utility and widget library based on glibmm and gtkmm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111924.n5BJONoK012864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503256 --- Comment #42 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 15:24:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > By the way "BR: graphviz" may be missing as build.log contains > may lines like: Yes, this was noted already in #33. Thanks for enlightening on the rpath issue. John: please go through all comments and check that you've addressed them properly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:23:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:23:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111923.n5BJNDJK012633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Tomas Mraz 2009-06-11 15:23:12 EDT --- I have only two nitpicks: 1. the script to create the new symlink is overly complicated why not do it this way: rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/%{name}.so mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir} VLIBNAME=$(ls $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_lib}/%{name}.so.*.*.*) LIBNAME=$(basename $VLIBNAME) ln -s ../../%{_lib}/$LIBNAME $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_libdir}/%{name}.so 2. there is unnecessary / before %{_libdir} on the symlink line in %files devel. The rpmlint is still silent: $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-debuginfo-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-devel-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-devel.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-0.4.1-1.src.rpm libcap-ng.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v libcap-ng-utils-0.4.1-1.x86_64.rpm libcap-ng-utils.x86_64: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. The nitpicks are no showstoppers so the package is ACCEPTED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:28:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:28:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] New: Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rake-compiler/rubygem-rake-compiler.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-rake-compiler/rubygem-rake-compiler-0.5.0-1.fc.src.rpm Description: rake-compiler aims to help Gem developers while dealing with Ruby C extensions, simplifiying the code and reducing the duplication. It follows *convention over configuration* and set an standarized structure to build and package C extensions in your gems. This is the result of expriences dealing with several Gems that required native extensions across platforms and different user configurations where details like portability and clarity of code were lacking. Koji build - For F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405896 - For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1405894 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:33:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:33:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111933.n5BJX0Lu015186@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #17 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-11 15:32:58 EDT --- Tom, is there a decision of FE-LEGAL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:36:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:36:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111936.n5BJae44016229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:39:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:39:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503847] Review Request: paperbox - A GTK tracker based document browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111939.n5BJdJnB017153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503847 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 15:39:18 EDT --- (Note that I don't intend to do full-review on this package, I am just trying to check if this package correctly builds) 0.4.2-2.fc10 won't build on F-12 because of another issue: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/paperbox/MOCK-paperbox-x86_64-2.fc10.log With the following patch, at least on F-12 i386/x86_64 this package builds (again I just checked if this package builds or not) http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/paperbox/paperbox-0.4.2-g++44.patch http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/paperbox/MOCK-paperbox-i586-modified-2.fc10.log http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/paperbox/MOCK-paperbox-x86_64-modified-fc10.log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111952.n5BJq0po020541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-11 15:51:59 EDT --- Any comments on the conflict between this and ESR's Trove project? http://catb.org/~esr/trove/ Is the other project sufficiently dead that this isn't an issue? Even this project's upstream seems to use "trove4j" in places. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:52:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:52:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111952.n5BJqKg2020645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-11 15:52:19 EDT --- I hadn't tried it in mock, so it's possible, but it builds on Mandriva's buildsystem (which uses clean chroots), so... just a sec, I'll try it in mock here. Hmm, you're right. Will investigate. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:54:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:54:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111954.n5BJseak031088@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 15:54:38 EDT --- - nilfs_cleanerd links against libnilfs.so.0 so the libraries should go in %{_lib} as for other packages of this type. rpmlint output: nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/lssu ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/mkcp ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/rmcp ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /sbin/nilfs_cleanerd ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/lscp ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/dumpseg ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/chcp ['/usr/lib64'] nilfs-utils.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libnilfs.so nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/mkfs.nilfs2 root 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/mkfs.nilfs2 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/nilfs_cleanerd root 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/nilfs_cleanerd 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/mount.nilfs2 root 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/mount.nilfs2 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /sbin/umount.nilfs2 root 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /sbin/umount.nilfs2 04755 nilfs-utils.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig nilfs-utils.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig nilfs-utils-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 4 warnings. - Get rid of rpath. - The .so file goes in -devel. - Are the permissions as wanted? I have to check other file system tools. - Use %post -p /sbin/ldconfig %postun -p /sbin/ldconfig MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. ~OK - I'd use a macro for /sbin, say %global _sbin /sbin MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. NEEDSWORK 2e056e7979ed77727a7798d79de5188f nilfs-utils-2.0.12.tar.bz2 6819db4b59f9504abe68ebc7818fd6ae ../SOURCES/nilfs-utils-2.0.12.tar.bz2 MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSWORK - Time stamps are not preserved, make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" should do the trick. MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK - See comments on rpmlint warnings. MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK - You might want to add [ -s AUTHORS ] && exit 1 [ -s NEWS ] && exit 1 [ -s README ] && exit 1 to the %setup phase so you get notified if these acquire content. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. NEEDSWORK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. OK - You might use just Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} to be clearer. MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504891] Review Request: trove - Efficient Java collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111956.n5BJuWuA021644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504891 --- Comment #2 from Jerry James 2009-06-11 15:56:31 EDT --- I don't know anything about that other Trove project, but it sure appears to be dead. It's developer mailing list doesn't even exist any more. However, I'm all for avoiding name conflicts. Should I call this submission "trove4j", do you think? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 19:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906111958.n5BJwOH7021944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #2 from Eric Sandeen 2009-06-11 15:58:23 EDT --- wow, that was a bit messier than I expected ;) Ok, thanks for the review, will fix up. Heh, I got the original tarball from their original src.rpm which doesn't match their released tarball, sigh. I'll fix that too. Thanks! -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 20:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505374] Review Request: nilfs-utils - Utilities for managing NILFS v2 filesystems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112011.n5BKBtEi003484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505374 --- Comment #3 from Eric Sandeen 2009-06-11 16:11:54 EDT --- Shoot, I hadn't even noticed the chmod u+s on some of these files, that strikes me as pretty odd, I'll have to investigate more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 20:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112027.n5BKRjvN007768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 Tim Niemueller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libkni - |Review Request: libkni3 - |C++ library for the Katana |C++ library for the Katana |robot arm |robot arm --- Comment #17 from Tim Niemueller 2009-06-11 16:27:41 EDT --- I'm back, thesis handed in and now there is more time again... - I have checked the library problems and fixed them with another patch. I have used this version with our arm and software and it works just fine. - I have renamed the package to libkni3. I have checked KNI4. But for older arms (the previous version, just out of production for a year) is not supported in version 4. Therefore version 3 will be necessary for some time to come (I'll contact Neuronics about this issue). I will file another review request for a libkni package, will track up2date upstream (i.e. v4.2 atm). Thanks for your patience, Jason. With your help we should be through with this real soon now. Sorry for the previous half-assed work, was distracted... New package is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni3-3.9.2-9.fc10.src.rpm, spec at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni3.spec, successful scratch build is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1406033 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 20:33:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:33:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112033.n5BKXFdr032313@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #45 from Paul Lange 2009-06-11 16:33:13 EDT --- make The %{name}-devel package contains development files for %{name}. to The %{name}-devel package contains development files for %{name}. %{name} is replaced with monodevelop-debugger-mdb and so the line gets longer than 80 characters which we want to avoid. I'll write Toshio a mail. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 20:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112040.n5BKeFLs011287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-11 16:40:13 EDT --- olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112108.n5BL81w8018615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #12 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-11 17:08:00 EDT --- In response to comment #11, I can remove the '/' from %{_libdir} even though it hurts nothing. But wrt to item 1, the only complication is that its saving the cwd and using it later. Its impossible to make a relative link without being in the directory so that the kernel sees both ends connected. You cannot make an absolute link since this is in the build root. So, I have updated the spec file with only the libdir fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488096] Review Request: rygel - A UPnP v2 Media Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112117.n5BLHEWq012213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488096 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #24 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-11 17:17:11 EDT --- Added to F11 as an update https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rygel-0.3-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:21:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:21:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112121.n5BLLVLb013411@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christian Krause 2009-06-11 17:21:30 EDT --- Hello Michal, (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > Both issues fixed: > > * Tue Jun 9 2009 Michal Nowak - 1.0.1-2 > - removed bogus ownership of %%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/ > - "docs" sub-package renamed to "doc" > > > http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir.spec > http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/libxdg-basedir/libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm I've reviewed the new packages and all reported issues are fixed. -> APPROVED. Christian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:24:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:24:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112124.n5BLOgd4023124@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-11 17:24:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > But wrt to item 1, the only complication is that its saving the cwd and using > it later. Its impossible to make a relative link without being in the directory > so that the kernel sees both ends connected. You cannot make an absolute link > since this is in the build root. So, I have updated the spec file with only the > libdir fix. AFAIK there's nothing to prevent it. You will just get a dangling-symlink warning from rpmlint if the file you link to is not in the same rpm package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:31:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:31:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112131.n5BLVlsq016018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-11 17:31:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Should: > 1) Remove unnecessary > BuildRequires: perl >= 0:5.005 Done. Thanks, Parag. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch Short Description: Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112137.n5BLbJnf026521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #14 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-11 17:37:18 EDT --- I must have had a typo when I tried it. It works. New spec file and srpm uploaded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 21:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112138.n5BLctRh017515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-11 17:38:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Should: > 1) Drop following Requires as yum will going to resolve it automatically. > Requires: perl(Config::IniFiles) > Requires: perl(Test::More) Done. I've also parsed all my .spec files so that this doesn't happen again. Again, thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Config-Auto Short Description: Magical config file parser Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 22:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112203.n5BM3Jxv000839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #7 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-11 18:03:18 EDT --- Thanks a lot, Christian! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 22:09:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:09:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112209.n5BM94IJ025468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-11 18:09:04 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libxdg-basedir Short Description: Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications Owners: mnowak Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mnowak -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 22:35:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:35:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112235.n5BMZ9kr009353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 --- Comment #15 from Tomas Mraz 2009-06-11 18:35:08 EDT --- OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 22:39:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:39:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-HTML-FillInForm/perl-HTML-FillInForm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-HTML-FillInForm/perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module fills in an HTML form with data from a Perl data structure, allowing you to keep the HTML and Perl separate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 22:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 18:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] New: Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 Summary: Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Pod-Xhtml/perl-Pod-Xhtml.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Pod-Xhtml/perl-Pod-Xhtml-1.59-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module files containing POD content and genrates well-formed XHTML documents from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 23:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112303.n5BN3dDR006916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #50 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-11 19:03:38 EDT --- libsunsky.so from yafaray-blender requires text relocation. http://people.redhat.com/drepper/textrelocs.html This requirement have to be either removed, or handled by the appropriate selinux-policy-targeted package (you have to submit a bug against the said package). Unfornately I was still not able to have a working yafaray rendering with blender. I was testing it with a newly installed F-10 i686 with flgrx. I was not able to test with F-11 because some artifacts with the radeon driver... Given that blender 2.48 seems to be the lastest version to support yafray. I would request blender to be keepted at 2.48a for F-10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 23:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112345.n5BNj3cf017526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 19:45:02 EDT --- Thanks: convention is to have a newline between changelog entries. Also there is a newer version on hackage: http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/utf8-string Also please update the srpm too when updating the spec file. :) There are a few rpmlint warnings from the binary packages: ghc-utf8-string-doc.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long This package contains development documentation files for the ghc-utf8-string library. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. Would be good to fix. ghc-utf8-string-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-utf8-string-devel ghc-utf8-string-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation ghc-utf8-string-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.10.3/utf8-string-0.3.5/libHSutf8-string-0.3.5_p.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. Normal and can be waived. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 11 23:53:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906112353.n5BNrAlS030254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #51 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-11 19:53:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #50) > libsunsky.so from yafaray-blender requires text relocation. > http://people.redhat.com/drepper/textrelocs.html > This requirement have to be either removed, or handled by the appropriate > selinux-policy-targeted package (you have to submit a bug against the said > package). > I always deactivate selinux on my systems. That is why I have never noticed the problem. > > Unfortunately I was still not able to have a working yafaray rendering with > blender. I was testing it with a newly installed F-10 i686 with flgrx. I was > not able to test with F-11 because some artifacts with the radeon driver... Why not? Because of the selinux problem or because of the ATI driver? I only have nvidia cards running the proprietary driver. > > Given that blender 2.48 seems to be the lastest version to support yafray. I > would request blender to be keepted at 2.48a for F-10. I am running blender 2.49 just fine with yafaray on F10 x86_64, but I cannot say if version 2.49 is stable enough (despite of yafaray). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 00:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120000.n5C001Ck031936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #24 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-11 20:00:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > Yeah, F-9 branches are no longer done. > You can ask for an exception, I guess from FESCo? Ticket filed as https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/163 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 00:08:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:08:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120008.n5C08UJM023861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 20:08:28 EDT --- I think it is not a blocker but I note that the following src files are missing license info/headers: System/Environment/UTF8.hs Data/ByteString/UTF8.hs Data/ByteString/Lazy/UTF8.hs Data/String/UTF8.hs Codec/Binary/UTF8/Generic.hs It would be good to point this out to the maintainer so that they can hopefully add headers to those files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 00:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120033.n5C0XbJh029706@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #14 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-11 20:33:36 EDT --- Here is the updated 0.3.5 package http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.5-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120100.n5C10Dop004082@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 --- Comment #6 from Byron Clark 2009-06-11 21:00:12 EDT --- I applied for the packager group. FAS Username: byronclark -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496633] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-gdb - GDB Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120115.n5C1FmP1008930@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496633 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-11 21:15:46 EDT --- Okay, so Paul's finished the review of the other package. This package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120119.n5C1JfEF009604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #46 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-11 21:19:40 EDT --- Excellent. Mauricio, please go to the account system and apply for the packager group: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ I'll sponsor you in and then you can import and build your packages. Paul has agreed to guide you in your work (since I don't do very much with mono packaging) so when you do your cvs request you can put him on the package as well. Note that once I've sponsored you, you'll be on step #4 here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:41:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120141.n5C1fwG4027269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #15 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 21:41:56 EDT --- I sent a mail to the maintainer asking to add license info to the above files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120143.n5C1hMak027755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #16 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 21:43:20 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=347505) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347505) ghc-utf8-string.spec-1.patch Basically likes fine to me now. I suggest this little patch to describe the package more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120147.n5C1lS5S029162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 21:47:25 EDT --- Zach, please apply for the packager group in FAS and I will sponsor you upon successful completion of this review. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 01:48:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120148.n5C1m4vo029317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-11 21:48:03 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/misc/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/misc/Mayavi-3.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 02:04:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:04:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120204.n5C24gmX022995@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-11 22:04:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libcap-ng Short Description: An alternative posix capabilities library Owners: sgrubb Branches: F-11 F10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 02:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120206.n5C267tE002143@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #18 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-11 22:06:06 EDT --- Here you go hopefully this will do it http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-utf8-string-0.3.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 02:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484423] Review Request: netbook-launcher - A clutter-based desktop launcher In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120210.n5C2A7WJ024808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484423 --- Comment #14 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-11 22:10:06 EDT --- OK, just a short message I'm still working on this. From a packaging POV most things look good (but there are some problems), but the app itself needs some love, especially the patch: - Logout dialog is huge, at least when using German localization - The dialog is not closed after switching user or locking screen - Icons standby and hibernate are not the right ones, should be the ones from g-p-m - Icon for reboot should be xfsm-reboot from xfce-session I guess - The Ubuntu artwork should be replaced with Fedora or removed - Change the colors to something more Fedora-like? I will look into these this weekend. BTW: The package does not build in F-12 due to missing BRs. I guess this a problem with pkg-config evaluating Requires.private in a pkgconfig file that is missing a requirement, but I haven't looked what is actually missing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 02:46:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:46:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120246.n5C2kfW1015472@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-11 22:46:40 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 02:50:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 22:50:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120250.n5C2o2Ie016697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-11 22:50:01 EDT --- Please use all dependencies from latest builds in koji (as I have just pushed them). These packages are: python-EnvisagePlugins-3.1.0 python-Traits-3.1.0 python-AppTools-3.2.0 python-Traits-3.1.0 python-EnthoughtBase-3.0.2 python-TraitsBackendQt-3.1.0 python-EnvisageCore-3.1.0 python-TraitsGUI-3.0.4 for all releases. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 03:01:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:01:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120301.n5C316kq020325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #19 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-11 23:01:04 EDT --- I think you can also change it when you come to import to cvs, but I would suggest simply: Summary: Haskell UTF8 layer for IO and Strings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 03:06:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:06:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120306.n5C36jbB009843@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 23:06:44 EDT --- Okay, now I am sponsoring you. Please follow "Join" wiki again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 03:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:08:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120308.n5C38OYj010122@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-11 23:08:23 EDT --- Note that currently I sponsor Byron. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 03:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 23:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120333.n5C3XGAY015126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #28 from Suvayu 2009-06-11 23:33:09 EDT --- Hi, I have been following this bug but I have no experience in packaging. So I posted to the project mailing list. The developers replied back about some of the issues discussed here (e.g. CINT). They also mentioned they will be able to help if someone takes this up with the developer team at rootdev at root.cern.ch or on their bug-tracker at https://savannah.cern.ch/projects/savroot/ . I am quoting the email below. Maybe this will help someone. - Suvayu *** quote begins *** Hi Suvayu, a few commentes: * CINT needs the include files in cint/cint/include at runtime. They are not build time include files (those are in cint/cint/inc) - think of them as something to be put in /usr/share/root. * ROOT does not use the stand-alone CINT binary; we split them intentionally also to allow package maintainers to produce CINT and ROOT packages without overlap. * ROOT is part of Debian, so you might want to contact "them" for the design they used. They managed to create ROOT modules like this (output from apt-get install root-, so some might be bogus): root-db-client root-plugin-gl root-plugin-netx root-plugin-ruby root-system-bin root-file-server root-plugin-hbook root-plugin-odbc root-plugin-sql root-system-common root-fitter root-plugin-krb5 root-plugin-peac root-plugin-tmva root-system-doc root-glviewer root-plugin-ldap root-plugin-pgsql root-plugin-unuran root-system-proofd root-plugin-asimage root-plugin-mathmore root-plugin-proof root-plugin-xml root-system-rootd root-plugin-clarens root-plugin-minuit root-plugin-python root-plugin-xproof root-system-xrootd root-plugin-eve root-plugin-minuit2 root-plugin-qt root-proofd root-tail root-plugin-fftw3 root-plugin-mlp root-plugin-quadp root-ttf root-plugin-fumili root-plugin-mysql root-plugin-roofit root-system * ROOT in Debian is a proof that there are no licensing issues ;-) * You won't have fun with your build result if you use the fedora default libAfterImage. We use the bleeding edge one all the time, basically because we are one of its main drivers for development. You have been warned :-) * Christian Holm Christensen is our packaging guru, as you were probably able to tell looking at $ROOTSYS/build/package/rpm/spec.in. Cheers, Axel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:36:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:36:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120436.n5C4aiM6010096@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 --- Comment #8 from Byron Clark 2009-06-12 00:36:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: lazygal Short Description: A static web gallery generator Owners: byronclark Branches: F-11 F-12 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:52:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:52:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120452.n5C4q0Ck013377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 --- Comment #9 from Byron Clark 2009-06-12 00:51:59 EDT --- I misunderstood the instructions for the CVS Request and included F-12 when it is not necessary. Is there a way to fix that request or will it go through without changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120429.n5C4TbQP029086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-12 00:29:35 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:32:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120432.n5C4WQfw009018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-12 00:32:25 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120420.n5C4KDgt027262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-12 00:20:12 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:33:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:33:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120433.n5C4XPQY009169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-12 00:33:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:55:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:55:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120455.n5C4t8Zl014078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-12 00:55:07 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1407299 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 9d107115e4f9e9c8e7aba53183e75744f2a8a6c4 HTML-FillInForm-2.00.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=23, Tests=104, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.14 usr 0.05 sys + 0.97 cusr 0.19 csys = 1.35 CPU) + Package perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-1.fc12.noarch=> Provides: perl(HTML::FillInForm) = 2.00 Requires: perl >= 0:5.005 perl(Carp) perl(HTML::Parser) >= 3.26 perl(integer) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:55:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120455.n5C4tBiO014107@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-12 00:55:10 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1407297 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fcd2b4ff57da57b04c34fcfd62f43f06d5f6f0a9 Pod-Xhtml-1.59.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=44, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.43 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.57 CPU) + Package perl-Pod-Xhtml-1.59-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(Pod::Hyperlink::BounceURL) = 1.7 perl(Pod::Xhtml) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(Pod::ParseUtils) perl(Pod::Parser) perl(Pod::Usage) perl(Pod::Xhtml) perl(URI::Escape) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120413.n5C4DqHH025611@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-12 00:13:50 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 04:07:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:07:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120407.n5C47UpX024137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-12 00:07:29 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 05:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 01:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120547.n5C5lhBB015516@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 01:47:42 EDT --- No need to fix as CVS admin will understand what you mean. By the way please set the fedora-cvs flag to ? . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 06:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120625.n5C6Psw2025064@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 06:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120630.n5C6UF2j005336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 02:30:14 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 06:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120630.n5C6UKfE005372@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 02:30:19 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 06:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 02:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] New: Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Summary: Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/acheck.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/acheck-0.5.1-1.fc11.src.rpm It is a text file checker and tool designed to help both translators and reviewers checking and fixing common localisation mistakes according to file format. Rules can be defined to add new checks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 07:03:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:03:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120703.n5C73txL015557@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 --- Comment #1 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-12 03:03:53 EDT --- Will need acheck-rules .. which I am packaging in some time. http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/acheck-rules/acheck-rules_0.3.1.tar.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 07:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120728.n5C7SKv0022085@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505508 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 07:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] New: Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Summary: Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 505507 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/acheck-rules.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/acheck-rules-0.3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Rules for acheck. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 07:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120728.n5C7SlPt010072@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-12 03:28:46 EDT --- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 07:55:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:55:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120755.n5C7tkh9029464@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 03:55:45 EDT --- perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 08:14:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:14:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120814.n5C8EmVA003259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-12 04:14:47 EDT --- Thanks again. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Pod-Xhtml Short Description: Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 08:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120815.n5C8F3np023384@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |499517 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 08:13:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:13:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120813.n5C8DT8T022769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-12 04:13:28 EDT --- Thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-HTML-FillInForm Short Description: Populates HTML Forms with data Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 08:01:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120801.n5C81ro0018696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 04:01:52 EDT --- perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 08:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906120854.n5C8sEs6002075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #32 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-12 04:54:09 EDT --- The build is failing under F-11. You can use "mock" to verify it. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Projects/Mock g++ -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -I/usr/include -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -MMD -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -I. -I.. -I../../include -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -DYYDEBUG -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -O -DDEFENV_SYSTEMC=\"\" -DDEFENV_SYSTEMC_ARCH=\"\" -DDEFENV_SYSTEMPERL=\"\" -DDEFENV_SYSTEMPERL_INCLUDE=\"/usr/include/perl-SystemPerl\" -DDEFENV_VERILATOR_ROOT=\"/usr/share/verilator\" -c ../V3Param.cpp g++ -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -I/usr/include -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -MMD -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -I. -I.. -I../../include -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -DYYDEBUG -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -ggdb -DVL_DEBUG -c ../V3PreProc.cpp ../V3PreProc.cpp: In member function ?virtual std::string V3PreProcImp::getline()?: ../V3PreProc.cpp:995: error: invalid conversion from ?const char*? to ?char*? make[2]: *** [V3PreProc.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/chitlesh/rpmbuild/BUILD/verilator-3.710/src/obj_dbg' make[1]: *** [../verilator_bin_dbg] Error 2 make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... g++ -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -I/usr/include -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -MMD -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -I. -I.. -I../../include -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -DYYDEBUG -O2 -g -march=i386 -mtune=i686 -O -DDEFENV_SYSTEMC=\"\" -DDEFENV_SYSTEMC_ARCH=\"\" -DDEFENV_SYSTEMPERL=\"\" -DDEFENV_SYSTEMPERL_INCLUDE=\"/usr/include/perl-SystemPerl\" -DDEFENV_VERILATOR_ROOT=\"/usr/share/verilator\" -c ../V3PreShell.cpp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 10:13:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:13:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501958] Review Request: scotch - Graph, mesh and hypergraph partitioning library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121013.n5CADEZL006683@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501958 --- Comment #4 from Deji Akingunola 2009-06-12 06:13:13 EDT --- I have fixed issues pointed out above; run the license files through iconv, drop the %config mark on the file in ld.so.conf.d, and use parallel make. I've also contacted the upstream author about the executable names, and he is OK with me prefixing them all by scotch_ (I believe he is going to apply the same change upstream with the next release of the library). Thanks. Spec URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch.spec SRPM URL: http://deji.fedorapeople.org/scotch-5.1.6-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 10:29:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:29:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121029.n5CATLuR031698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Novotny 2009-06-12 06:29:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > Better. I still get > > mailman.src:46: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/%{name} > A library path is hardcoded to one of the following paths: /lib, /usr/lib. It > should be replaced by something like /%{_lib} or %{_libdir}. > > mailman.src:131: W: configure-without-libdir-spec > A configure script is run without specifying the libdir. configure options > must be augmented with something like --libdir=%{_libdir} whenever the script > supports it. > > mailman.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 63, tab: line 132) > The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic > annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. > > On the SRPM. this is strange, because I fixed this: rpmlint says "0 errors 0 warnings" on SRPM here... if you look at the new spec, you can see that the --libdir=%{_libdir} is there for example -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 10:43:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:43:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121043.n5CAhEY8015166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #4 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-06-12 06:43:11 EDT --- Spec URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-tar.spec SRPM URL: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-tar-0.3.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 10:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 06:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121050.n5CAokHF017463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 --- Comment #17 from Panu Matilainen 2009-06-12 06:50:43 EDT --- rpath is disabled starting with 3.6.14-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 11:33:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:33:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121133.n5CBXRCv030808@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #29 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-12 07:33:20 EDT --- I emailed Christian Holm Christensen for changing some parts in the spec-file, in order it is alowed here in fedora? Just want to say, I am on it again ;-) The drafts I'm working on now are at: http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/cernroot/root.spec http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/spurath/public/cernroot/root_v5.22.00.source.tar.gz I hope over the weekend my part will be finished, and I'll wait for Christians answer. Can someone confirm "* ROOT in Debian is a proof that there are no licensing issues ;-)" from the last comment? The fonts should still NOT be allowed in fedora... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 11:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 07:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121139.n5CBdT6i032229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(robin.norwood at gma | |il.com) --- Comment #18 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-12 07:39:28 EDT --- Thanks! So close to review+ :), right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 12:09:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 08:09:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121209.n5CC9kjP027911@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #52 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-12 08:09:41 EDT --- So to sum-up, needworks: 1- Get the package compliant with SElinux (either allowing selinux-policy, or fixing the package at source). 2- Fix the package to actually work. (my wild guess it that the code isn't compliant with -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2). About the directory problem (and the fact that the package seems to split .py and .so despite they seems to be targeted to be used from the same directory). The directory scheme used in this package heavily rely on the blender-wrapper script which yet, isn't upstreamed. This is bad, as this may (will have to) evolve. Nevertheless If such changes, appears from the blender package, it can be tweaks for Rawhide only. According that the directory scheme seems to more or less works, please Fix 1/ and 2/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 13:20:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:20:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121320.n5CDKbEj019444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #30 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-12 09:20:34 EDT --- Thomas this spec doesn't have any -devel -libs etc. subpackages, it doesn't even deal with the fonts really, it just removes them and adds a requires: root-ttf. For libAfterImage the version in f10 and in root are both 1.18 so I don't see an issue there. For the font side now, just removing the ms fonts last time I checked doesn't stop the X interface from working (freetype is used which deals with it) BUT the postscript output was broken since it needs the MS .ttf files. Looking at the code (graf2d/graf/src/TTF.cxx) it looks like the code also looks for free versions for some of the fonts (FreeMono.ttf, ...) so removing the MS ones and replacing them with the free ones should work. The liberation fonts probably provide a better solution so patching the code to add them is a also good idea. Not sure where we can get symbol.ttf though. I'll try to find someone from the Fonts SIG to have a look at this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 13:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452427] Review Request: awesome - Extremely fast, small, dynamic and awesome floating and tiling window manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121323.n5CDNBCk031229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452427 --- Comment #57 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-12 09:23:06 EDT --- http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/awesome/awesome-3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 13:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121353.n5CDrpIH008695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #33 from wsnyder at wsnyder.org 2009-06-12 09:53:47 EDT --- Grr, every GCC version has slightly different things it complains about... This will patch it, let me know if you want a new release instead. If there's another bug, please try "make -k" so they'll all show up rather than one at a time. Thanks diff --git a/src/V3PreProc.cpp b/src/V3PreProc.cpp index 84856dc..4f76ba8 100644 --- a/src/V3PreProc.cpp +++ b/src/V3PreProc.cpp @@ -990,7 +990,7 @@ int V3PreProcImp::getToken() { string V3PreProcImp::getline() { // Get a single line from the parse stream. Buffer unreturned text until the newline. if (isEof()) return ""; - char* rtnp; + const char* rtnp; bool gotEof = false; while (NULL==(rtnp=strchr(m_lineChars.c_str(),'\n')) && !gotEof) { int tok = getToken(); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 13:59:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:59:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505578] New: Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505578 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-se.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-se-1.0-0.1.beta7.fc11.src.rpm Description: Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 14:33:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:33:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121433.n5CEX2NW021054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 14:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505578] Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121435.n5CEZCGd012047@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505578 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 14:36:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:36:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121436.n5CEa0Fc022152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 14:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121441.n5CEfrfk023626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #31 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-12 10:41:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #30) > Thomas this spec doesn't have any -devel -libs etc. subpackages, it doesn't > even deal with the fonts really, it just removes them and adds a requires: > root-ttf. Yes, atm I try to compile with the .spec file provided by the root developer themselves. I'll talk with them to add -devel and so on for unity purpos. Right now 5.22 and 5.23 won't compile, maybe because of gcc 4.4, they don't seem to use it? As already mentioned, I'm new to packaging. It will probably take the weekend till I have usefull results and will notice you here again... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 14:44:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:44:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121444.n5CEi8Pg014535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Robert Spanton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Robert Spanton 2009-06-12 10:44:05 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: msp430-binutils New Branches: F-11 Owners: rspanton -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121501.n5CF17lU019998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 11:01:06 EDT --- R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:02:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:02:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121502.n5CF2pGY020332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 11:02:51 EDT --- R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121521.n5CFLaN9026218@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 11:21:35 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_rails.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_rails-2.0.4-2.fc.src.rpm * Fri Jun 12 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.4-2 - Also mark gettext mo files under test/ directory with %%lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:23:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:23:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121523.n5CFNm8N003108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 11:23:47 EDT --- proguard-4.3-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/proguard-4.3-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:20:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:20:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121520.n5CFK7SH002204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 11:20:06 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord-2.0.4-2.fc.src.rpm * Fri Jun 12 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.4-2 - Also mark gettext mo files under test/ directory with %%lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:24:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:24:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502065] Review Request: slashem - Super Lotsa Added Stuff Hack - Extended Magic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121524.n5CFOu8O003357@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502065 Iain Arnell changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505613 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:31:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:31:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121531.n5CFVtRk029171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:28:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:28:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121528.n5CFSKKq028168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Robin Norwood changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review?, |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(robin.norwood at gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #19 from Robin Norwood 2009-06-12 11:28:18 EDT --- Yup! Passes review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:40:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:40:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121540.n5CFetGB000465@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 11:40:54 EDT --- Will review shortly. Instead I would appreciate it if you review either of my review requests (bug 504707, bug 504709 or bug 505406). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:40:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:40:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121540.n5CFeGmg000303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 11:40:15 EDT --- Will review shortly. Instead I would appreciate it if you review either of my review requests (bug 504707, bug 504709 or bug 505406). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467418] Review Request: mingw32-libvirt - MinGW Windows libvirt virtualization library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121539.n5CFds3d008266@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467418 --- Comment #7 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-06-12 11:39:51 EDT --- Michel, before you look at this, note that it is still waiting on a missing BR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 15:55:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:55:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] New: Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Summary: Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mcepl at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-urllib2_kerberos.spec SRPM URL: http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: urllib2 plugin for kerberos authentication. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 16:12:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:12:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121612.n5CGCDlq008630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #6 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-12 12:12:12 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > rpmlint output: > xorriso.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/xorriso.pc Removed during %install and also communicated with upstream to remove it, he agreed. > xorriso.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/xorriso-0.3.8/CONTRIBUTORS > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. > - Drop the CONTRIBUTORS file and add > [ -s CONTRIBUTORS ] && exit 1 fixed. > - Change > Release: 1%{?dist} > to Release: 1.%{__patchlevel}%{?dist} fixed. > NEEDSWORK > - License is GPLv2 and GPL+ and (LGPLv2+ or MIT), not GPLv2. > * Most of the files are under GPLv2. > * cleanup is under GPL license (GPL+) > * make_isohybrid_mr is LGPLv2+ or MIT. fixed to: GPLv2 and GPL and LGPLv2+ > - No source URL provided. Source matches upstream. fixed. > - Time stamps are not preserved, use > make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p" fixed. > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. > NEEDSWORK > - Add Requires: pkgconfig. Not needed as file is removed during the install and will disappear in future releases. > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK > - Not all licenses are included. Communicated with upstream. What should i do with this, start hunting those files myself (not preferred) or wait the next release and fix the spec to include them? Spec URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec SRPM URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-2.pl00.fc10.src.rpm f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408600 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 16:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 12:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121614.n5CGEp4h009174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 12:14:50 EDT --- Some notes: * URL, Source0 - Currently the written URL seems invalid and I could not any files from the URL written as %SOURCE0 * About checking size ----------------------------------------------------- [ -s ChangeLog ] && exit 1 # exit if file has non-zero size ----------------------------------------------------- - Well I guess it is better that you check the tarball and "ChangeLog" file by yourself instead of resorting to such method... * Timestamp - It is preferred to keep timestamps on installed files (for this package especially for header files) by: ----------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" ----------------------------------------------------- This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 17:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121706.n5CH6IDu031545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #32 from Thomas Spura 2009-06-12 13:06:16 EDT --- ATM I have some troubles to compile even with the original .spec. It does not make any sence to continue now, till I get answer from the root devels. Is there anyone else working on this? Maybe we can stick together. Kostas? Here is the bug I opened upstream https://savannah.cern.ch/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=51747 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 17:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505155] Review Request: libcap-ng - An alternative posix capabilities library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121724.n5CHOcRB003646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505155 Steve Grubb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Steve Grubb 2009-06-12 13:24:37 EDT --- The package has been built in devel. I will build into F-11 and F-10 in the next day or two. Closing. Thanks for the review and feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 17:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121732.n5CHWrK1005722@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #7 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-12 13:32:52 EDT --- Added desktop menu entry for KDE RMB over file. [Desktop Entry] Type=Service ServiceTypes=KonqPopupMenu/Plugin MimeType=application/x-cd-image; Actions=xorrisoExtractHere; X-KDE-Priority=TopLevel X-KDE-StartupNotify=false [Desktop Action xorrisoExtractHere] Name=Xorriso: extract ISO-image here Name[fi]=Xorriso: Pura ISO tiedosto t?h?n Icon=media-optical Exec=/bin/nice -n 19 ionice -n7 -c3 xorriso -indev "%F" -osirrox on -cp_rx "*" "$(/usr/bin/dirname %F)" Spec URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec SRPM URL: http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-3.pl00.fc10.src.rpm f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 17:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121748.n5CHmoH1000872@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Paul Fox changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #25 from Paul Fox 2009-06-12 13:48:47 EDT --- setting cvs?, since fesco #163 was approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:02:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:02:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121802.n5CI2JJV014912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla 2009-06-12 14:02:18 EDT --- Somehow built with the wrong spec. Rebuilding. . . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:16:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:16:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121816.n5CIGj1E008939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-12 14:16:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > rpmlint output: > > xorriso.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > > /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/xorriso.pc > > Removed during %install and also communicated with upstream to remove it, he > agreed. OK, please add comment about this to the spec file. > > NEEDSWORK > > - License is GPLv2 and GPL+ and (LGPLv2+ or MIT), not GPLv2. > > * Most of the files are under GPLv2. > > * cleanup is under GPL license (GPL+) > > * make_isohybrid_mr is LGPLv2+ or MIT. > > fixed to: GPLv2 and GPL and LGPLv2+ You are missing the + from GPL. Please use my version.. > > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK > > - Not all licenses are included. > > Communicated with upstream. What should i do with this, start > hunting those files myself (not preferred) or wait the next > release and fix the spec to include them? Just wait until the next release. Fedora doesn't have a policy on this unlike Debian, we just don't ship the license files if they're not present upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:19:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:19:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121819.n5CIJabk019731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-12 14:19:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Added desktop menu entry for KDE RMB over file. > > [Desktop Entry] > Type=Service > ServiceTypes=KonqPopupMenu/Plugin > MimeType=application/x-cd-image; > Actions=xorrisoExtractHere; > X-KDE-Priority=TopLevel > X-KDE-StartupNotify=false > > [Desktop Action xorrisoExtractHere] > Name=Xorriso: extract ISO-image here > Name[fi]=Xorriso: Pura ISO tiedosto t?h?n > Icon=media-optical > Exec=/bin/nice -n 19 ionice -n7 -c3 xorriso -indev "%F" -osirrox on -cp_rx "*" > "$(/usr/bin/dirname %F)" You need to use install the desktop file properly, see the Packaging Guidelines. Also I've never seen this type of thing used before, so I probably need to study it a bit. And a second thing: use cp -p to keep the time stamps on the files you copy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:36:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121836.n5CIav9r024473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 14:36:55 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-0.7.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:53:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:53:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121853.n5CIrqbG028797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 14:53:51 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openttd-0.7.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121852.n5CIqnMD028568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-12 14:52:47 EDT --- Here are my initial notes. I still have to check the licensing stuff, the doc files and a few other things: * Please remove %{version} from URL. Isn't this the actual website? http://code.enthought.com/projects/mayavi/ * Source0 gives 404. Also, could you use %{name} and %{version} in Source0 and wherever else they can be used? ! Patches should be explained and be submitted to upstream and upstream tracker links should be given (if available) as comments ? Is the group tag correct? * The BR's python-devel, python-setupdocs, python-Traits don't seem necessary. The package builds the same way without them. * rpmlint says: Mayavi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/mayavi/html/.buildinfo Mayavi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/tvtk/html/.buildinfo Can we get rid of these files? ? What is this line for? sed -i 's/\.dev$//g' $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitearch}/%{name}-%{version}-*.egg-info/requires.txt ? What is this file that gets packaged? /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/Mayavi-3.2.0-py2.6-nspkg.pth ! I don't think we need this anymore: # unstripped-binary-or-object #chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitearch}/enthought/tvtk/array_ext.so If you want to keep it, please escape the macro with an extra % - koji rawhide and F-10 seem fine http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408825 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408830 ? There is this release dependent BR: %if 0%{?fedora} >= 11 BuildRequires: numpy-f2py %else BuildRequires: numpy %endif Also there is this release independent R: Requires: numpy Is there an inconsistency here? ! It seems like the description is made to span 70 columns. Can you make it span 80 columns instead (as far as possible)? * Package requires python-Traits >= 3.1.0 python-TraitsBackendQt >= 3.1.0 Can you add these versioned dependencies? * Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file (which applies to both the mayavi2 and tvtk_doc executables), and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. Follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. This package owns /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/ which is also owned by python-Traits. This needs attention. * tvtk_doc exits via segmentation fault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121852.n5CIqtcx018044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-12 14:52:54 EDT --- These are service menus, not really appropriate for desktop-file-install procedures. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 18:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121856.n5CIuwft019057@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-12 14:56:57 EDT --- Some notes: * Fonts symlink ------------------------------------------------------------------- ln -s %{_datadir}/fonts/bistream-vera/VeraBd.ttf %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/data/fonts/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- - This is /bi"t"stream-vera/ ( does this mean that this file is actually not needed? ) * Timestamps ------------------------------------------------------------------- 359 make -f Makefile.pokerth_game install 360 make[1]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/PokerTH-0.7-src' 361 install -m 644 -p /builddir/build/BUILD/PokerTH-0.7-src/data/data-copyright.txt /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pokerth-0.7-1.fc12.i386/usr/share/pokerth/data/ 362 cp -f -r /builddir/build/BUILD/PokerTH-0.7-src/data/fonts /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/pokerth-0.7-1.fc12.i386/usr/share/pokerth/data/ ------------------------------------------------------------------- - make install INSTALL_ROOT=%{buildroot} COPY="cp -p -f" is preferred to keep timestamps on installed files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 19:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504748] Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121935.n5CJZEoO006756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-12 15:35:13 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 19:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906121940.n5CJeA8O031109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #11 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-12 15:40:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > You need to use install the desktop file properly, see the Packaging > Guidelines. Also I've never seen this type of thing used before, so I > probably need to study it a bit. I think Rex is right that this is not the regular menu entry. > And a second thing: use cp -p to keep the time stamps on the files you copy. fixed, also the GPL+ and dropped CONTRIBUTORS file completely. Probably there would be possibility to add other actions like creating an image from selected files, but it would have to default to some default name (which would cause problems if that would already exist in the given dir) or first file name with .iso extension (which lowers the collision risk, but doesn't remove it). Wouldn't be very keen to add too much of woodoo to Exec line either. Perhaps that needs more thinking and asking advice from upstream. http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso-0.3.8-4.pl00.fc10.src.rpm f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408975 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 20:24:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:24:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122024.n5CKO2pL019604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 21:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122118.n5CLI7ae001475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 17:18:05 EDT --- pidgin-gfire-0.8.2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-gfire-0.8.2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 21:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122121.n5CLLivT024377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #27 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-12 17:21:43 EDT --- Correct package name is olpc-kbdshim, sorry. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 21:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122120.n5CLKZoN024021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #26 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-12 17:20:33 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: olpc-kbd-shim New Branches: F-9 Owners: pgf cwickert -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 21:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122127.n5CLR3eM025743@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Valmantas Palik?a changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |walmis at balticum-tv.lt --- Comment #43 from Valmantas Palik?a 2009-06-12 17:26:58 EDT --- I think a "Provides: dbus-bluez-pin-helper" entry is required, since bluez has this in the Requires fields. Without it, it would be difficult to install blueman as the only bluetooth manager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 21:55:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 17:55:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492583] Review Request: pidgin-gfire - Xfire plugin for Pidgin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122155.n5CLtZVu032628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492583 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 17:55:35 EDT --- pidgin-gfire-0.8.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pidgin-gfire-0.8.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 12 23:22:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:22:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906122322.n5CNMrdu030671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Eelko Berkenpies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at berkenpies.nl Flag| |fedora-review?, needinfo? --- Comment #1 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-06-12 19:22:52 EDT --- I'll write a proper review later on. I discovered two early bird issues though. :) 1. BuildRequires: libsamplerate-devel is missing / needed. 2. Typo which causes the devel package fail to install ( incorrect %{version} tag used ): %package devel Summary: Development files for %{name} Group: Libraries/Development Requires: %{name} = %[version}-%{release} %description devel %{summary}. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 01:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130133.n5D1X5cO026618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 21:33:04 EDT --- libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 01:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 21:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130134.n5D1YZ0R026845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-12 21:34:35 EDT --- libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 04:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 00:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130401.n5D41P6i020961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #12 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-13 00:01:24 EDT --- The upstream Author made a new version with GPLv2 headers in the source files. I have added the gcc and g++ build flags. I have taken upstream's minimum package dependency versions recommendations and added them to the spec file. This package builds successfully on all platforms for Fedora 10 and 11 using Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409599 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409604 There are is no rpmlint warnings or errors on my Fedora 11 system. The new files are again at: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 07:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130701.n5D71jGr005822@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-13 03:01:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=347715) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347715) ghc-utf8-string.spec-2.patch ghc-utf8-string.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Haskell utf8-string library. A UTF8 layer for IO and Strings. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 07:42:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:42:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130742.n5D7gYAr014988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 --- Comment #21 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-13 03:42:31 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, !:needs attention, NA: not applicable MUST Items: [!] MUST: rpmlint output fixed by above patch [+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines [+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name} [+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines Author responded he would add more license headers in his next release. [+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license. [+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible. [+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release d5198209bd81ea4f8af7692e2467336c utf8-string-0.3.5.tar.gz [+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch [+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs [+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [+] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409756 Package is APPROVED by Jens Petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 07:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 03:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130747.n5D7lOHR007051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #22 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-13 03:47:23 EDT --- Please just fix the rpmlint warning for the summary and tidy up the descriptions (as covered by the last patch) before importing to cvs. :) Please include me and haskell-sig in the InitialCC field of the CVS Admin Request, which is the next step. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:01:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:01:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130801.n5D81fMj019785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-13 04:01:40 EDT --- ping-aling! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:00:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:00:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130800.n5D80hOF010427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #10 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-13 04:00:42 EDT --- Can you update your package again based on your experience of the utf8-string review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130831.n5D8Vk0t018303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-13 04:31:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > 4) Not an issue, but I will mention it upfront. Upstream includes the MS > TrueType fonts The licensing of those fonts does not comply with our guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Legal_considerations We basically require the same freedom to distribute and modify of our fonts than of our software. Also, even if they did, we'd ask to locate the font upstream and package it separately http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Package_layout_for_fonts Bundling fonts is prohibited. Fonts must be split out cleanly so they can be installed separately and reused by other packages Also, when a project relies on default fonts from another OS or Linux distribution, you have to ask yourself if the look, feel and metrics of those fonts is required before hunting for the closest substitute. If the software does not rely on some exact font characteristic, reconfiguring it to use Fedora default fonts instead is much preferred. The Liberation fonts are metrically-equivalent to some MS fonts. However they are *not* our default font, so forcing their use will make your application stand out in Fedora. Also they have a lot less Unicode coverage than Dejavu Fonts. GNU free fonts are not installed at all by default in Fedora and are not present on liveCDs and other physical distribution media. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_Bitstream_Vera.2C_Arev.2C_DejaVu_LGC_or_another_Bitstream_Vera_font_derivative.3F http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_if_my_package_bundles_FreeSans.2C_Linux_Libertine.2C_Droid_or_Liberation_fonts.3F A lot of the symbols in symbol.ttf have long been attributed standard unicode values. If this software properly references those symbols by their unicode codepoint (and not the old legacy symbol-specific codepoint) any unicode font with coverage of the associated unicode blocks will work for you (DejaVu includes most common symbols). If this is not good enough for you, you can look at openoffice's opensymbol (and open a bug dejavu-side to request the missing symbol). Lastly, if you have all those problems, that's probably because this software does not use fontconfig. Fontconfig has been the default font management stack for many years on modern Unixes and anything using X. It will locate for you the most appropriate installed font transparently. Using something else is broken by design nowadays, and you'll have no end of font-related problems till the software is switched to use fontconfig (unlike under windows, the font complement varies from Unix to Unix and release to release, Unix font Unicode coverage is not and won't ever be exactly the same as windows fonts, etc). The only correct mid-term solution is getting this software ported to fontconfig, usually using a higher-level library like pango-cairo. (and if it manages PDFs is should probably take a look at poppler too) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 08:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 04:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130831.n5D8VQCO027276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #44 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-13 04:31:23 EDT --- Juan: Ping. Anything you can get sponsored for? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 09:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130919.n5D9JgMQ005166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 05:19:40 EDT --- rpmlint output: healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_sph_transform_lib.so 0775 healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_pixel_lib.so 0775 healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_fitsio_lib.so 0775 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. - Fix the permissions, they should be 755. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. NEEDSWORK - This is a python module, so the correct name is python-healpy. MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK - Remember to change this as well. MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK - GPLv2+ license headers are now present and correctly picked up by licensecheck.pl - The test file test/test_fit_dipole.py is still missing a license. This is not a problem per se, since the license of the package is already clear from the other files. MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. NEEDSWORK - Add ChangeLog and test/test_fit_dipole.py to %doc. MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK - License file is still missing. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 09:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130928.n5D9STSX007521@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 05:28:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Some notes: > > * URL, Source0 > - Currently the written URL seems invalid and I could not > any files from the URL written as %SOURCE0 Ugh, they're migrating their web pages to a new wiki. Fixed URL to point to old wiki. When I made the package the FTP site had xdrfile-1.1b.tar.gz which fixed the license issue. I see it has now been renamed to xdrfile-1.1.tar.gz, since the files are binary equal. Which means that the default %setup doesn't work. Must make a bug about this upstream. > * About checking size > ----------------------------------------------------- > [ -s ChangeLog ] && exit 1 # exit if file has non-zero size > ----------------------------------------------------- > - Well I guess it is better that you check the tarball and > "ChangeLog" file by yourself instead of resorting to > such method... Well, currently the file has no content, so I want to be notified automatically if at some stage later on it gains content. > * Timestamp > - It is preferred to keep timestamps on installed files > (for this package especially for header files) by: > ----------------------------------------------------- > make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" > ----------------------------------------------------- > This method usually works for Makefiles generated by > recent autotools. Whoops, fixed. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/xdrfile-1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 09:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130944.n5D9iKhZ011015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 05:44:19 EDT --- - Why do you rm -f CONTRIBUTORS as it isn't going anywhere...? - You need to own %{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/ and Requires: kde-filesystem for the desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 09:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130956.n5D9umwt014000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 05:56:47 EDT --- rpmlint output: xorriso.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.3.8-4 ['0.3.8-4.pl00.fc11', '0.3.8-4.pl00'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - Add the missing patchlevel suffix to the last item in the changelog. - Also, you might want to use install -D -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/xorriso_servicemenu.desktop instead of mkdir -p %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus cp -p %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. ~OK - The MIT bit is still missing, but I guess that's okay. - In fact, when you think of it, the resulting license of the whole shebang is GPLv2, since it's compatible with every one of the licenses in the package, so you were right from the start :) MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. NEEDSWORK - You are missing ownership of servicemenu dir as stated in #12. MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. ??? - Must check this. MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 09:59:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 05:59:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906130959.n5D9xW1v005289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 05:59:30 EDT --- Fixed symlink and timestamp issue. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pokerth.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/pokerth-0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 10:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131000.n5DA0gcl014845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #2 from Minto Joseph 2009-06-13 06:00:40 EDT --- Hello, Made suggested changes. Following was added to overcome a build error. %ifnarch x86_64 # x86_64 does not have brp-compress %define __spec_install_post %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress %endif I have also added PPC64 arch to it. %ifnarch x86_64 PPC64 # x86_64 and PPC64 does not have brp-compress %define __spec_install_post %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress %endif patch to port spell checker from pspell to hunspell is still not available. Ayttm would work without spellcheck support. http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ayttm-0.5.0-90.fc11.src.rpm http://mintojoseph.fedorapeople.org/packages/newguide/ayttm.spec Please check Thanks Minto -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 10:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131007.n5DA7ilj007359@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-13 06:07:33 EDT --- Well, about the directory /usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus : # repoquery --repoid=koji-12 --whatprovides /usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus | sort kdebase-6:4.2.90-1.fc12.i586 kdebase-workspace-0:4.2.90-2.fc12.i586 kdemultimedia-6:4.2.90-2.fc12.i586 kdenetwork-7:4.2.90-1.fc12.i586 kdesdk-0:4.2.90-1.fc12.i586 kdesvn-0:1.3.0-1.fc12.i586 kdeutils-6:4.2.90-1.fc12.i586 konq-plugins-0:4.2.2-1.fc11.i586 I think kde-filesystem should own this directory and these other packages should not own it. I will ask kde people about how they think of this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 10:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131003.n5DA30Ov006292@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #14 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-13 06:02:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > - Why do you > rm -f CONTRIBUTORS > as it isn't going anywhere...? fixed. > - You need to own > %{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/ > and Requires: kde-filesystem for the desktop file. I'm not willing to pull desktop packages for CLI tool. That menu entry is just convenience entry. Even I would like to, why kde-filesystem? $ rpm -ql kde-filesystem|grep -c ServiceMenus;cat /etc/fedora-release 0 Fedora release 10 (Cambridge) That dir is not owned by any particular kde 'base' pkg, my installed ones: $ rpm -qf /usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus kplayer-0.7.0-1.20081211cvs.fc10.x86_64 kdesvn-1.3.0-1.fc10.x86_64 kdeutils-4.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kdenetwork-4.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kdebase-4.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kdemultimedia-4.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64 konq-plugins-4.2.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kdebase-workspace-4.2.3-4.fc10.x86_64 last package only drops its own /usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/installfont.desktop entry there, so it falls to same category with others. http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 10:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131014.n5DAEFeS017816@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505735 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 10:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 06:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131017.n5DAHpl1009749@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 06:17:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > - You need to own > > %{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/ > > and Requires: kde-filesystem for the desktop file. > > I'm not willing to pull desktop packages for CLI tool. > That menu entry is just convenience entry. Even I would > like to, why kde-filesystem? kde-filesystem is NOT a desktop package. $ rpm -qi kde-filesystem|grep Size Size : 3551 License: Public Domain $ rpm -qR kde-filesystem config(kde-filesystem) = 4-25.fc11 filesystem rpm rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 rpmlib(VersionedDependencies) <= 3.0.3-1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 12:50:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:50:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131250.n5DCoJDY009823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #17 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 08:50:18 EDT --- At least kdesdk doesn't use any desktop installs, so I guess the desktop file is OK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 14:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131419.n5DEJL1p028498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:13:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:13:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131513.n5DFDwZH007618@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #18 from Tim Niemueller 2009-06-13 11:13:54 EDT --- I have updated two patches for F-11 compatibility. New SRPM is at http://fedorapeople.org/~timn/robotics/libkni3-3.9.2-10.fc10.src.rpm, F-11 scratch build is at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409942 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:33:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:33:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505760] New: Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505760 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-eu.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-eu-0.20080628-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Basque hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: libnewmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131539.n5DFd3ro022948@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-13 11:39:01 EDT --- Note that I am not a sponsor. However, I have quickly reviewed your package (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines) and fixed the warnings of rpmlint. The corresponding new specification file and source RPM are to be found here: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/newmat/11/1/newmat.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/newmat/11/1/newmat-11-1.fc10.src.rpm ------------------------------------------------------------------------- and it builds nicely on all architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1409984 So, following are a few points, in no particular order, that I have fixed in my version of the specification file (and with the patch): 0. I have renamed the package from 'libnewmat' into 'newmat', as it matches upstream naming (http://www.robertnz.net/ftp/newmat11.tar.gz). See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#General_Naming for further details. 1. License. Please have a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses . For instance, "Public Use" does not exist. In my version of the spec file, I have used "Public Domain", which is acceptable for Fedora. However, it would be better to contact upstream (robert at statsresearch.co.nz), in order to clarify the license issue and potentially explicitly add a license file, if so intended. 2. Use of the exit() function in the upstream code (myexcept.cpp). 'rpmlint -i' states: "newmat.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libnewmat.so.11.1 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 This library package calls exit() or _exit(), probably in a non-fork() context. Doing so from a library is strongly discouraged - when a library function calls exit(), it prevents the calling program from handling the error, reporting it to the user, closing files properly, and cleaning up any state that the program has. It is preferred for the library to return an actual error code and let the calling program decide how to handle the situation." I have thus written a patch (http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/newmat/11/1/newmat-11-fix-exit-issue.patch) fixing that issue. That patch should be submitted/proposed upstream (as I have just coded a work-around, which upstream may not find appropriate). 3. Dynamic library. Usually, the library is set to be executable when installed: install -p -D -m 0755 lib/lib%{name}.so %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/lib%{name}.so.%{version} where %{version} is the full version (e.g., '11.1') ------------------ If you agree with the above, and you contact upstream for the corresponding issues (license, exit() function), and if upstream is fine with the license ("Public Domain"), I shall approve that package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131542.n5DFgl46013750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - Newmat C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131541.n5DFf0fT023578@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: libnewmat - |Review Request: newmat - |Newmat C++ matrix library |Newmat C++ matrix library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131541.n5DFfCXf023772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 Denis Arnaud changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: newmat - |Review Request: newmat - |Newmat C++ matrix library |C++ matrix library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 15:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131551.n5DFp4cU015653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-13 11:51:03 EDT --- As the FE-LEGAL dependency has been added, here is the corresponding discussion: No license file is provided by upstream, and no mention of any license appears in the upstream site (http://www.robertnz.net) and files (readme.txt and source code), except the following statement in readme.txt: "This library is freeware." I would suggest to contact upstream to add an explicit license file (and to choose an explicit license, such as GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+). But "Public Domain" may just be fine? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 16:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131616.n5DGGoZH021056@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #46 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-13 12:16:47 EDT --- 1. The following line: Requires: libstdc++-devel, atlas-devel, lapack-devel, boost-devel should be removed, as the corresponding dependencies are already taken into account by the 'BuildRequires:' line, and as the 'Requires:' dependencies are automatically calculated: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires . 2. I would add a "-f" (force) flag in the following line: rm examples/Makefile.cmake But it may be due to my paranoia :) 3. Since you are the main upstream developer, I would suggest (but that is not at all a Fedora requirement) to burry the header files in a specific directory, resulting, after the installation, into: %{_includedir}/armadillo/armadillo %{_includedir}/armadillo/bits %{_includedir}/armadillo/armadillo_itpp That way, you would have to add the armadillo directory prefix when you include Armadillo headers. For instance: #include instead of #include But that is only a suggestion! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 16:39:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:39:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505770] New: Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505770 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-gl.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-gl-0.99-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Galician hyphenation rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 16:59:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 12:59:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131659.n5DGxwpN007220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-13 12:59:57 EDT --- Would you explain why you added "BR: asio-devel"? boost::asio is defined in the header files in boost-devel. By the way would you have a time to review my review requests? If not I will ask someone else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 17:18:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 13:18:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131718.n5DHI1LK001277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 13:18:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Would you explain why you added "BR: asio-devel"? > boost::asio is defined in the header files in boost-devel. Oh, that was part of debugging why I couldn't get it to compile on F10. Didn't help, removed. > By the way would you have a time to review my review requests? > If not I will ask someone else. To tell the truth I'm a bit swamped at the moment with 35 open reviews, but if I get time I will have a look at them. IIRC I haven't done any ruby gem reviews so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131804.n5DI4MEg011168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-13 14:04:21 EDT --- If new boost is needed to compile this package, you can write explicitly: BR: boost-devel >= 1.37 to show that this won't build on F-10. ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (pokerth) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:14:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:14:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131814.n5DIEnnR022618@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #47 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-13 14:14:47 EDT --- Re: Comment 46 > 1. Unusual. Typically, explicit Requires for a -devel package are added because building with the -devel package requires files contained within additional -devel packages (e.g. headers which are included by default). At least the Boost headers are included by the files in armadillo-devel -- and there is no pkg-config file and therefore no automatic dependency-chain based on the Requires found in the pkg-config file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:14:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131814.n5DIEpKA022653@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-13 14:14:48 EDT --- Okay. ---------------------------------------------------------- This package (xdrfile) is APPROVED by mtasaka ---------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:30:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:30:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131830.n5DIUSMP026276@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 14:30:27 EDT --- I versioned the BR, thanks a lot for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pokerth Short Description: A Texas-Holdem poker game Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:33:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:33:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131833.n5DIX1ik026703@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 14:33:00 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xdrfile Short Description: A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files Owners: jussilehtola Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:52:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:52:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131852.n5DIqDN6020944@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #33 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-13 14:52:11 EDT --- Mamoru Tasaka I have updated perl-Goo-Canvas to 0.06, It is looks very OK! SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.06-1.fc11.src.rpm SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec koji build report: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1410282 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 18:56:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:56:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131856.n5DIu7vf031524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #8 from Pascal 2009-06-13 14:56:07 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'll contact upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:19:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:19:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498130] Review Request: lxinput - Keyboard and mouse settings dialog for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131919.n5DJJCTW003359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498130 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487973] Review Request: lxmenu-data - Data files for the LXDE menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131921.n5DJLWAM026195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487973 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:19:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:19:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219930] Review Request: lxpanel - A lightweight X11 desktop panel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131919.n5DJJ2it025478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219930 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|163779(FE-ACCEPT) |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442269] Review Request: lxappearance - Feature-rich GTK+ theme switcher for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131922.n5DJMoJF004269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442269 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442270] Review Request: lxde-common - Default configuration files for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131923.n5DJN378004346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442270 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498492] Review Request: lxshortcut - Small utility to edit application shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131921.n5DJLfij004122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498492 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 442268] Review Request: lxsession-lite - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131923.n5DJNojW026687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442268 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:27:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:27:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452395] Review Request: lxlauncher - Open source replacement for Asus Launcher of the EeePC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131927.n5DJRfbn027471@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452395 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477719] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_lxsession-edit_-_Simple_G?= =?utf-8?q?UI_to_configure_what=E2=80=99s_automatically_started_in_LXDE?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131923.n5DJNC4f026571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477719 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131927.n5DJRTBV005280@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:25:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:25:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498125] Review Request: lxde-settings-daemon - XSettings Daemon for LXDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131925.n5DJPN9b004964@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498125 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 445140] Review Request: lxtask - Lightweight and desktop independent task manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131927.n5DJRwHm005437@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445140 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:27:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:27:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 452324] Review Request: lxterminal - Desktop-independent VTE-based terminal emulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131927.n5DJRoXT005377@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=452324 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:28:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:28:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478668] Review Request: lxmusic - Lightweight XMMS2 client with simple user interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131928.n5DJSImm027659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478668 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505781(LXDE) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131933.n5DJXjWP028601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Bug 504749 depends on bug 504748, which changed state. Bug 504748 Summary: Review Request: perl-PDF-Reuse - Reuse and mass produce PDF documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504748 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-13 15:33:44 EDT --- Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse-0.03-2.fc11.src.rpm Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1410391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131938.n5DJcqVp029497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #5 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-13 15:38:51 EDT --- Ok, updated: http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SPECS/hlint.spec http://konradm.fedorapeople.org/fedora/SRPMS/hlint-1.4-1.fc10.src.rpm Note: we need to package ghc-hscolour (new package for us I think) and also update ghc-haskell-src-exts to 0.4.8 or higher, so right now this doesn't actually build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:43:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:43:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131943.n5DJhq56008153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 --- Comment #34 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-13 15:43:47 EDT --- Lane, the package is ready. please update the package with respect to the following minor details. Then I'll approve. #1 add the Artistic file as %doc #2 compiler fix from Wilson: sed -i "s|char\* rtnp;|const char\* rtnp;|" src/V3PreProc.cpp #3: rpmlint warning spurious-executable-perm chmod 0644 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/%{name}.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131944.n5DJi69b030430@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131950.n5DJoFe4009361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(shakthimaan at gmail | |.com) --- Comment #15 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-13 15:50:13 EDT --- Shakthi, is there any reason why you haven't build the package ? the srpm hasn't yet being committed for any branch. http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/mcu8051ide/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 19:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906131958.n5DJwv3a000721@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 Bug 505184 depends on bug 505735, which changed state. Bug 505735 Summary: Should own /usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505735 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 20:11:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:11:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132011.n5DKB5ul003795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #48 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-13 16:11:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #47) > > Unusual. Typically, explicit Requires for a -devel package are added because > building with the -devel package requires files contained within additional > -devel packages (e.g. headers which are included by default). At least the > Boost headers are included by the files in armadillo-devel -- and there is no > pkg-config file and therefore no automatic dependency-chain based on the > Requires found in the pkg-config file. With the version without the 'Requires:' line, after installation of the RPMs, I get: # rpm -qpR armadillo-0.6.11-8.fc10.x86_64.rpm [...] libblas.so.3()(64bit) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) libcblas.so.3()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) liblapack.so.3()(64bit) liblapack_atlas.so.3()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(GLIBCXX_3.4)(64bit) # ldd -r /usr/lib64/libarmadillo.so.0.6.11 [...] liblapack_atlas.so.3 => /usr/lib64/atlas/liblapack_atlas.so.3 (0x00007fd825c3a000) libcblas.so.3 => /usr/lib64/atlas/libcblas.so.3 (0x00007fd825a1c000) libblas.so.3 => /usr/lib64/atlas/libblas.so.3 (0x00007fd825067000) liblapack.so.3 => /usr/lib64/atlas/liblapack.so.3 (0x00007fd8248ab000) libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib64/libstdc++.so.6 (0x00007fd8245a0000) libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00007fd824104000) libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007fd823d91000) libf77blas.so.3 => /usr/lib64/atlas/libf77blas.so.3 (0x00007fd823b74000) libatlas.so.3 => /usr/lib64/atlas/libatlas.so.3 (0x00007fd8231f4000) libgfortran.so.3 => /usr/lib64/libgfortran.so.3 (0x00007fd822f19000) Indeed, the Boost libraries are not needed, apparently because the ARMA_USE_BOOST environment variable is not set to true when calling cmake. That way, Armadillo does not use Boost, even when it is present on the building platform. In the header files delivered with the -devel sub-package, Boost is not used as, but through a specific wrapper, namely arma_boost, which does not need Boost when the ARMA_USE_BOOST variable is set to false. We may try to alter the specification file, so as to define the ARMA_USE_BOOST variable to true. In that case, the RPM building process should detect the dependency on Boost, I guess. Or did I miss something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 20:17:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:17:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132017.n5DKHfY5004797@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #49 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-13 16:17:40 EDT --- I forgot, following is the version I used: ----------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/armadillo/0611/8/armadillo.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/armadillo/0611/8/armadillo-0.6.11-8.fc10.src.rpm ----------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 20:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132023.n5DKNfaf005788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #18 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-13 16:23:41 EDT --- Dir ownership issue is now solved. http://tuju.fi/fedora/11/xorriso.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 21:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132101.n5DL1dgg022857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #50 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-13 17:01:38 EDT --- The following is an attempt to build with Boost: ----------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/armadillo/0611/9/armadillo.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/armadillo/0611/9/armadillo-0.6.11-9.fc10.src.rpm ----------------------------------- Boost is detected by CMake, but it seems that the Boost libraries are still not needed (most of Boost is made of just headers). However, as when ARMA_USE_BOOST is set to true, some Boost headers (e.g., Boost Date-Time) are included, it is indeed required to add the dependency on boost-devel for the -devel sub-package. That is fine. But, as lapack-devel and blas-devel include only libraries (and not header files), I would exclude the correspondent dependency from the 'Requires:' part. The same way, I would exclude dependency on 'libstdc++-devel'. So, following is a suggestion for the corresponding part in the RPM specification file: ------------------- # The header files of %{name} include some Boost header files, delivered within # the boost-devel sub-package. However, since there is no dependency on any # Boost library (most of Boost is delivered as header files only), the RPM # building process does not detect that dependency. That dependency must # therefore be added manually. Requires: boost-devel ------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 21:27:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:27:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132127.n5DLRTOo016776@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #19 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-13 17:27:28 EDT --- Hmm, I don't see the desktop file in the %files section. Did you try building the new spec file..? Also I think you miscopied the install part: install -D -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/xorriso_servicemenu.desktop You have to specify the name of the file in the destination, now it installs the desktop file as the file %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/kde4/services/ServiceMenus. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 21:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 17:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498194] Review Request: zarafa - Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132142.n5DLglrU030204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck 2009-06-13 17:42:45 EDT --- I need some help because of a undefined symbol issue in Fedora 11 and newer: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg00999.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 22:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426387] Merge reviews to be completed for F9 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132240.n5DMe9Yu007951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426387 Bug 426387 depends on bug 226429, which changed state. Bug 226429 Summary: Merge Review: sqlite https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 13 22:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 18:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906132240.n5DMe8Zb007919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 Michal Nowak changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #20 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-13 18:40:07 EDT --- Thanks all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:24:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:24:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505813] New: Review Request: Ballview Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Ballview https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 Summary: Review Request: Ballview Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mycae at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/ballview-1.spec SRPM URL: http://dhd.selfip.com/427e/ballview-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Koji Build: F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1410847 RPMLint output: ]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/ballview-1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm ../RPMS/i386/ballview-*2-1.* ../RPMS/noarch/ballview-doc-1.2-1.fc10.noarch.rpm ballview.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXmu ballview.i386: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libVIEW.so.1.2 exit at GLIBC_2.0 ballview-devel.i386: W: no-documentation ballview-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ballview/doxygen/latex/classBALL_1_1CreateSpectrumProcessor.tex ballview-doc.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/ballview/doxygen/latex/classBALL_1_1RotationalEntropyLoss.tex 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 4 warnings. Without the libXmu requires, the build fails at configure time. Not sure what requires I should use here. As for the UTF-8 errors, I will fix them along with whatever comments are made here for -2. Sorry about that, limited time to spend on this and the build takes my poor little machine a long time to complete. Bugs have been opened upstream : -regarding the use of the exit() function http://ball-trac.bioinf.uni-sb.de/ticket/221 -Missing LGPL boilerplate on source files. http://ball-trac.bioinf.uni-sb.de/ticket/220 -Incorrectly written unit test http://ball-trac.bioinf.uni-sb.de/ticket/219 -Header file patches http://ball-trac.bioinf.uni-sb.de/ticket/218 Possible problems: *The include subdir of the tarball has .iC files, which I have no idea what they are for. They appear to be C++ like, with heavy use of preprocessor macros, but why should this be in include? *One of the unit tests hangs (on the actual test itself, not the component being tested, as far as I can tell). I have therefore disabled make test, and opened an upstream bug. *I removed smpflag support, as I suspect the makefiles of not being reliable when run in this fashion (I had a few problems building with -j 2, which were intermittent, which have not re-occurred since removal of smpflags). *Enabling GSL and FFTW support modifies the licence to GPLv3. This can be disabled at configure time to match the closer upstream LGPL. However I wasn't entirely sure of fedora policy here, so I just enabled them and set the licence field accordingly. *Ballview complains about missing python import "BALL" on startup and subsequently disables in-app python support. Wasn't sure how to fix this at this stage. I would appreciate a co-maintainer if possible, as I am not entirely familiar with QT & SIP, and the package is somewhat large. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140426.n5E4QdFM004609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478388] Review Request: UDAV - data visualisation program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140429.n5E4Tm9t004968@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478388 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:29:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:29:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478372] Review request: Mathgl - Scientific plotting library. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140429.n5E4TlXd004941@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478372 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:27:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:27:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140427.n5E4REVs004709@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505154 Depends on|505154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:29:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:29:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140429.n5E4TkJv004916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |478372, 478388 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:27:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140427.n5E4RDUX004689@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|505813 | Depends on| |505813 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:26:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:26:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140426.n5E4QdTR004589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mycae at yahoo.com Blocks| |505813 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:31:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:31:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505813] Review Request: Ballview - Molecule and protien visualisation and analysis In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140431.n5E4VUrn026386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505813 D Haley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Ballview |Review Request: Ballview - | |Molecule and protien | |visualisation and analysis -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140454.n5E4s47A030270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-14 00:54:02 EDT --- Here is the rest of the review: * As indicated by LICENSE_COLORBREWER.txt, parts of the file enthought/mayavi/core/lut/pylab_luts.py is distributed under ASL 1.1 and it should be added to the license tag. * image_LICENSE.txt says "Crystal: LGPL license as described in icon_LICENSE_CP.txt" but icon_LICENSE_CP.txt contains the full text of GPLv2. Can you ask this upstream for clarification? Even if they say it is LGPL, we cannot ship this icon_LICENSE_CP.txt file as it is wrong. * image_LICENSE_OOo is LGPLv3+ and this has to be added to the license tag. * docs/mayavi2.man should be packaged. Is this a man1? ? Is the documentation under docs/source/ worth packaging? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 04:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 00:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140454.n5E4spLH030365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #51 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-14 00:54:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > 2. I would add a "-f" (force) flag in the following line: > rm examples/Makefile.cmake ok > 3. (...) I would suggest (but that is not at all a Fedora > requirement) to burry the header files in a specific > directory, resulting, after the installation, into: > %{_includedir}/armadillo/armadillo > %{_includedir}/armadillo/bits > %{_includedir}/armadillo/armadillo_itpp > That way, you would have to add the armadillo directory > prefix when you include Armadillo headers. For instance: > #include The files from the "armadillo_bits" directory are never directly included by the user (it wouldn't work). Instead, the user includes only one file, i.e. #include which then includes everything from "armadillo_bits". (In reply to comment #50) > ... > But, as lapack-devel and blas-devel include only libraries > (and not header files), I would exclude the correspondent > dependency from the 'Requires:' part. I see what you're getting at, but I'm not totally clear on this. Users will be linking their armadillo programs with -larmadillo, which in turn should automatically pull in the lapack and blas libraries. However, aren't "/usr/lib/liblapack.so" and "/usr/lib/libblas.so" required for this to work? (they're present in lapack-devel and blas-devel). > The same way, I would exclude dependency on 'libstdc++-devel'. Armadillo explicitly needs the header files from "libstdc++-devel", unless we can assume that a c++ compiler will always be installed ? (I didn't want to make a dependency on gcc-c++, as people may possibly want to use another compiler). > So, following is a suggestion for the corresponding part in the RPM > specification file: > ------------------- > # The header files of %{name} include some Boost header files, delivered within > # the boost-devel sub-package. However, since there is no dependency on any > # Boost library (most of Boost is delivered as header files only), the RPM > # building process does not detect that dependency. That dependency must > # therefore be added manually. > Requires: boost-devel > ------------------- ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 05:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 01:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140551.n5E5p4kN008594@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 --- Comment #3 from Brennan Ashton 2009-06-14 01:51:03 EDT --- The rest of the review: [ATTENTION] rpmlint is silent. rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm ../SRPMS/python-repoze-what-pylons-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm python-repoze-what-pylons.spec python-repoze-what-pylons.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 3) python-repoze-what-pylons.spec: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 11, tab: line 3) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. this is simple to fix. The package requires python-decorator >= 3.0 this is only in f12 not f11. We need to either update it in f11 or see if it really needs 3.0. The URL field is also wrong. I will continue when these are addressed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 06:24:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 02:24:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140624.n5E6OZcB025986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #52 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 02:24:34 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > (In reply to comment #50) > > ... > > But, as lapack-devel and blas-devel include only libraries > > (and not header files), I would exclude the correspondent > > dependency from the 'Requires:' part. > > I see what you're getting at, but I'm not totally clear on this. Users will be > linking their armadillo programs with -larmadillo, which in turn should > automatically pull in the lapack and blas libraries. However, aren't > "/usr/lib/liblapack.so" and "/usr/lib/libblas.so" required for this to work? > (they're present in lapack-devel and blas-devel). The armadillo library is linked against blas and lapack, this is picked up by rpm which adds dependencies on the soname'd libraries as Denis said in #48. One doesn't need blas-devel and lapack-devel to use armadillo, just blas and lapack which are automatically pulled in. > > The same way, I would exclude dependency on 'libstdc++-devel'. > > Armadillo explicitly needs the header files from "libstdc++-devel", unless we > can assume that a c++ compiler will always be installed ? (I didn't want to > make a dependency on gcc-c++, as people may possibly want to use another > compiler). This, on the other hand I'd keep, since nothing picks this up automatically. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 08:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140807.n5E874dT013643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #53 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-14 04:07:02 EDT --- Re: comment #48 > With the version without the 'Requires:' line, after installation > of the RPMs, I get: > # rpm -qpR armadillo-0.6.11-8.fc10.x86_64.rpm Since you suggested to delete "Requires" lines from the armadillo-devel (!) subpackage, you need to query the armadillo-devel package, not the main one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 09:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501573] Review Request: ndoutils - Stores data from Nagios in a database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140933.n5E9XhLC031428@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501573 --- Comment #12 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-14 05:33:42 EDT --- Hi, The chmod is moved now to the %prep set up with sense. Concerning the configuration I've put now in /etc/nagios as per the documentation. It is certainly harmless in there and if that matches the documentation then I guess that is good. I moved it originally so as not to clutter the /etc/nagios directory. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 09:49:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:49:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906140949.n5E9nvfn002405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #20 from Juha Tuomala 2009-06-14 05:49:56 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Hmm, I don't see the desktop file in the %files section. Did you try building > the new spec file..? Forgot to copy new file into tuju.fi, reload please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 09:54:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505845] New: Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505845 Summary: Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-cy.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hyphen-cy-0.20080619-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Welsh hyphenation patterns -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 10:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] New: Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-lzf/php-pecl-lzf.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-lzf/php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This extension provides LZF compression and decompression using the liblzf library LZF is a very fast compression algorithm, ideal for saving space with a slight speed cost. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 10:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141021.n5EAL1li008791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 10:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141024.n5EAO92Q009240@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #54 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-14 06:24:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #51) > Armadillo explicitly needs the header files from "libstdc++-devel", unless we > can assume that a c++ compiler will always be installed ? (I didn't want to > make a dependency on gcc-c++, as people may possibly want to use another > compiler). As stated on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 , there is no need to explicitly set a dependency on gcc-c++ . And, if we have a look at the specification file of gcc (generating the gcc-c++ sub-package: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/gcc/F-11/gcc.spec?revision=1.49&view=markup), we see that the gcc-c++ gets an explicit dependency on libstdc++-devel package: %package c++ Summary: C++ support for GCC Group: Development/Languages Requires: gcc = %{version}-%{release} Requires: libstdc++ = %{version}-%{release} Requires: libstdc++-devel = %{version}-%{release} And that seems normal to me, as anyone developing in C++ would like to be able to use the STL (and, hence, the STL header files). So, to recap, I would just list boost-devel within the 'Requires:' dependency, and add the result of that discussion within the Wiki (for example by adding an "Exception" sub-section to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires, but I have not the right to alter that page). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 10:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141042.n5EAgUeY012868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #70 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-14 06:42:20 EDT --- Tried to rebuild http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm on Fedora 11 and this is what I get. IMHO, it HAS to go before the review ends: + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot ******************************************************************************* * * WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild' * to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS' * environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values * below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000. * * 0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor * issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without * providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib * environments. * 0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute * nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk * 0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a * SECURITY risk * 0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other * RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted * 0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs * and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries * 0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break * the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink * * * Examples: * - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like * $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm * - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like * $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT= /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths * ******************************************************************************* ERROR 0008: file '/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/components/sbMetadataHandlerTaglib.so' contains the $ORIGIN rpath specifier at the wrong position in [/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2:$ORIGIN/../xulrunner] ERROR 0008: file '/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/mangle' contains the $ORIGIN rpath specifier at the wrong position in [/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2:$ORIGIN/../lib64:$ORIGIN/../lib] ERROR 0008: file '/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/mangle' contains the $ORIGIN rpath specifier at the wrong position in [/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2:$ORIGIN/../lib64:$ORIGIN/../lib] ERROR 0008: file '/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/shlibsign' contains the $ORIGIN rpath specifier at the wrong position in [/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2:$ORIGIN/../lib64:$ORIGIN/../lib] ERROR 0008: file '/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2/xulrunner/shlibsign' contains the $ORIGIN rpath specifier at the wrong position in [/usr/lib64/songbird-1.1.2:$ORIGIN/../lib64:$ORIGIN/../lib] chyba: ?patn? n?vratov? k?d z /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.b5Kpm5 (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 10:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141048.n5EAm6SA013947@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 06:48:05 EDT --- libmemcached-0.30-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.30-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 10:46:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 06:46:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141046.n5EAkq7o013797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 06:46:50 EDT --- libmemcached-0.30-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libmemcached-0.30-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 11:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141115.n5EBFP3M006763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #55 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-14 07:15:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #54) > there is no need to explicitly set a dependency on gcc-c++ > ... > So, to recap, I would just list boost-devel within > the 'Requires:' dependency, and add the result of > that discussion within the Wiki The intent was never to put a dependency on gcc-c++, but specifically only on libstdc++-devel. Jussi Lehtola (comment #52) seems to agree with this. According to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 "There is no need to include the following packages or their dependencies as BuildRequires", followed by a list which includes gcc-c++. However, these exceptions are for "BuildRequires" and not "Requires". So we can't assume that gcc-c++ is installed on the user's machine, and hence we can't assume that libstc++-devel is installed. It can be stated that Armadillo is not usable without a C++ compiler, however we leave the choice of the compiler upto the user. The question is whether libstdc++-devel is specific to g++, or whether it can be used by other compilers (including g++ derivatives). If it can be used by other compilers, I'd prefer to have the "Requires" as follows for armadillo-devel: Requires: boost-devel, libstdc++-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 11:26:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:26:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141126.n5EBQXbb008838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #56 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-14 07:26:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > 1. The following line: > Requires: libstdc++-devel, atlas-devel, lapack-devel, boost-devel > should be removed, as the corresponding dependencies are already taken into > account by the 'BuildRequires:' line, and as the 'Requires:' dependencies are > automatically calculated: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Requires . Aren't you confused here ? The Requires is for the -devel package and not for the main package. Denis, I would appreciate in the future, if you could just post the lines what need attention rather a separate SRPM. I nearly mistook your spec for the review. The package from my point of view is fine. Any objection before I approve it ? http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-7.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 11:41:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:41:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141141.n5EBfeTr023724@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #57 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-14 07:41:39 EDT --- Conrad what is your FAS username ? I'll use it to sponsor you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505845] Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141209.n5EC9c9E016998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505845 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505760] Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141212.n5ECC9Qq017693@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505760 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141213.n5ECDCcq029655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #58 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-14 08:13:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #57) > Conrad what is your FAS username ? I'll use it to sponsor you. Thanks. FAS username sent to your email -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505770] Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141212.n5ECC9Kv029479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505770 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141217.n5ECHn57018920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #59 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-14 08:17:48 EDT --- Re: comment #55 No, that's a misinterpretation of the guidelines. The spec file's BuildRequires become the src.rpm's Requires. The gcc-c++ package is mandatory in the "development-tools" as well as "buildsys-build" comps groups. And in turn libstdc++-devel is assumed to be available, too, and need not be specified as a Requires/BuildRequires in any package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:39:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:39:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] New: Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Summary: Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at famillecollet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/qelectrotech.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/qelectrotech-0.20-0.1.rc1.fc8.src.rpm Description: QElectroTech is a Qt4 application to design electric diagrams. It uses XML files for elements and diagrams, and includes both a diagram editor and an element editor. Koji scratch build : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1411161 rpmlitn is silent. Perhaps a FEL candidate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141248.n5ECmUx7004054@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #60 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 08:48:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #56) > The package from my point of view is fine. Any objection before I approve it ? > http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-7.fc10.src.rpm IMO the Requires: atlas-devel, lapack-devel of armadillo-devel are probably unnecessary. If one builds with g++ -larmadillo not with g++ -llapack -latlas -larmadillo then one doesn't need atlas-devel or lapack-devel and these can be safely dropped, since armadillo acts as a wrapper for the atlas and lapack libraries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 12:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141248.n5ECmbvU024765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 13:46:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:46:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141346.n5EDkb2W014777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 15:14:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:14:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141514.n5EFEkPk030751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #34 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-14 11:14:44 EDT --- you have small typo in %description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 15:10:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:10:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141510.n5EFA1nQ030026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-14 11:10:00 EDT --- decorator-3.0 changes API but there's only a few things that currently depend on it in the distro: python-fedora-0:0.3.12-1.fc11.noarch bodhi-server-0:0.5.19-1.fc11.noarch python-pylons-0:0.9.7-0.2.rc4.fc11.noarch The code in python-fedora should be fine (examined, not tested). pinged kylev about python-pylons. lmacken, you'll know about bodhi-server... If there's only one usage of decorator in bodhi, it's probably okay but could be ported to use python-fedora's generalization of the bodhi code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 15:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 11:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141540.n5EFedrP023900@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #71 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-14 11:40:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #70) > Tried to rebuild http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.1.2-2.fc11.src.rpm on > Fedora 11 and this is what I get. IMHO, it HAS to go before the review ends: I've made a similar comment as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422#c59 and #c63 Whereas using rpath is appropriate for the current package (as an application that bundle it own xulrunner - thunderbird does the same for exemple), the $ORIGIN rpath seems only needed for Solaris. Hence, there is a need to clean the $ORIGIN rpath. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:06:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:06:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226028] Merge Review: libIDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141606.n5EG66EK007757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226028 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:06:03 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:09:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:09:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225886] Merge Review: hfsutils In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141609.n5EG9ZoZ008046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225886 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:09:33 EDT --- ping dmwm2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225978] Merge Review: kudzu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141607.n5EG7tBe028464@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225978 --- Comment #12 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:07:53 EDT --- Rawhide freeze is over, please push the new release and close this bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:10:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:10:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226299] Merge Review: pkgconfig In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141610.n5EGAgbt029265@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226299 --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:10:40 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226330] Merge Review: pychecker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141611.n5EGBsBE029372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226330 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:11:53 EDT --- ping vcrhonek -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226331] Merge Review: pydict In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141613.n5EGD6Ij008793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226331 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rbhalera at redhat.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:13:06 EDT --- ping rbhalera -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226443] Merge Review: switchdesk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141614.n5EGE46L029720@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226443 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:14:03 EDT --- ping than -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:15:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:15:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225699] Merge Review: dmraid In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141615.n5EGF22q030132@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225699 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:14:59 EDT --- ping lvm-team -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225677] Merge Review: dbus-python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141615.n5EGFmb4030325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225677 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:15:47 EDT --- ping davidz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225796] Merge Review: giflib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141617.n5EGHdkN009626@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225796 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|needinfo?(nmurray at redhat.co |fedora-review+ |m), fedora-review? | --- Comment #9 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:17:37 EDT --- OK, this looks good then. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:18:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:18:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141618.n5EGI7tQ009687@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #1 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-14 12:18:06 EDT --- #1: typo in comments # Prog is GPLv2 - #####Elements###### are Creative Commons Attribution The package in general is ok, however I feel it is too software oriented and lacks its professional touch in terms of the wordings. #2: Inorder to maintain consistency between other FEL packages, the sub-packge -elements should be called "-symbols", (e.g geda-symbols, soon kicad-symbols). #3: use of Electronic menu structure Add Requires: electronics-menu and in desktop-file-install --add-category "Electronics" \ remove the office category #4: Since we want FEL to be as professional as possible, i would like you to rephrase the %description so that it doesn't feel too geeky QElectroTech helps to design electric schematics. It includes both a schematic editor and an symbol editor. diagram was replaced by schematic element was replaced by symbol Maybe you can ask upstream to take this wordings into account as well. The more it uses similar words, the easier it will be for fedora ambassadors for market qelectrotech around the world Same for the summary, replace "diagrams" by schematics. #5: Group: Applications/Engineering #6: missing for subpackage -elements Requires: qelectrotech = %{version}-%{release} #7: is there any reason for %if 0%{?fedora} >= 11 BuildArch: noarch %endif if it is only for symbols in the XML format then it should be by default noarch ? #8 update the spec file, I'll approve it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141622.n5EGMsCK010549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Eelko Berkenpies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #2 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-06-14 12:22:53 EDT --- I finished the rest of the review in the mean time. Issues mentioned in comment #1 still apply at this point. I guess it's ready to be approved when those things get fixed. Legenda: ------------------ [x] Fail [V] Success [-] Does not apply [?] Needinfo/work ------------------ Review: ------------------ [?] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [eelko at localhost i586]$ rpmlint liblastfm-0.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [eelko at localhost i586]$ rpmlint liblastfm-debuginfo-0.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [eelko at localhost i586]$ rpmlint liblastfm-devel-0.3.0-1.fc11.i586.rpm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: non-standard-group Libraries/Development liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [eelko at localhost SRPMS]$ rpmlint liblastfm-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm liblastfm.src:40: W: configure-without-libdir-spec liblastfm.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 8, tab: line 1) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Perhaps you could look at the spaces and tabs while you're at it? :) [V] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [V] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [V] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [V] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [V] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [-] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [V] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [V] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [V] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [eelko at localhost Download]$ pwd /home/eelko/Download [eelko at localhost Download]$ md5sum liblastfm-0.3.0.tar.bz2 3f73222ebc31635941832b01e7a494b6 liblastfm-0.3.0.tar.bz2 [eelko at localhost SOURCES]$ pwd /home/eelko/rpmbuild/SOURCES [eelko at localhost SOURCES]$ md5sum liblastfm-0.3.0.tar.bz2 3f73222ebc31635941832b01e7a494b6 liblastfm-0.3.0.tar.bz2 [V] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [-] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [?] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. [-] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [V] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [V] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [V] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [V] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [V] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [V] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [V] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [V] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [-] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [-] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [V] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [-] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [-] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [-] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [V] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [-] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [-] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [V] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [V] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [V] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. ------------------ Conclusion: ------------------ NEEDINFO ------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141627.n5EGRdZs011546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:27:38 EDT --- Please rebuild this package also on F-10/11 and submit push request on bodhi: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:29:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:29:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141629.n5EGT5nO011672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141625.n5EGPeSB011177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Bug 493246 depends on bug 493247, which changed state. Bug 493247 Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493247] Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Wnck -- Perl interface to the Window Navigator Construction Kit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141625.n5EGPd4q011142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493247 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:25:37 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:28:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:28:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500476] Review Request: cups-bjnp - cups backend for Canon bjnp (USB over IP) printers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141628.n5EGSofV032370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500476 --- Comment #17 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:28:49 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141636.n5EGa6hO013169@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:36:04 EDT --- Please let us know it when you receive some response from the upsteam. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141642.n5EGgUsI014241@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:42:28 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141641.n5EGfrnT014161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:41:50 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:44:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:44:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141644.n5EGiPvX014411@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Eelko Berkenpies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:42:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:42:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141642.n5EGgwD5002426@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:42:55 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:46:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:46:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492094] Review Request: darksnow - GTK Interface for darkice In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141646.n5EGkTiQ003219@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492094 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:46:28 EDT --- I will close this bug as NOTABUG if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492744] Review Request: python-grizzled - The Grizzled Utility Library is a general-purpose Python library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141647.n5EGlSKm015106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492744 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:47:26 EDT --- again ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226346] Merge Review: python-pyblock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141652.n5EGq4Ba004106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226346 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:52:03 EDT --- ping pjones -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141652.n5EGqCS4004156@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) --- Comment #20 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:52:10 EDT --- Jeroen, ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:52:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:52:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226159] Merge Review: mozplugger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141652.n5EGqZ3K015918@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226159 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 12:52:33 EDT --- ping than -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481507] Review Request: clanship - Battleship clone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141652.n5EGqveh004335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481507 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:52:56 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:57:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:57:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455226] Review Request: php-pecl-runkit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141657.n5EGvjjY016885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455226 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #30 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:57:42 EDT --- This package is already imported. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:58:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:58:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141658.n5EGwMFZ016963@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:58:20 EDT --- What is the status of this bug? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 16:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 12:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478609] Review Request: djmount - Mounts UPnP Audio/Video/Photo shares as FUSE filesystems. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141655.n5EGtVjk016518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478609 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) | --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 12:55:28 EDT --- Closing If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this bug as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495885] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Client-SMTP - Asynchronous mail sending with POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141703.n5EH3JTD006113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495885 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #10 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-14 13:03:18 EDT --- Done and done. I'll assume the updates will find their way to the repos shortly. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141709.n5EH9jKN018832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet 2009-06-14 13:09:44 EDT --- Thanks for the comment/review. I've asked upstream for some feedback. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:22:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:22:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] New: Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Summary: Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Puzzle library is designed to quickly find visually similar images (gif, png, jpg), even if they have been resized, recompressed, recolored or slightly modified. The library is free, lightweight yet very fast, configurable, easy to use and it has been designed with security in mind. This spec file includes, a PHP extension rpm sub package as well as the devel subpackage. I do need someone to sponsor the package if they can please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:23:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:23:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141723.n5EHNOCR010033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:38:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:38:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141738.n5EHc14Q012491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #4 from Antti Andreimann 2009-06-14 13:38:00 EDT --- I sent upstream an e-mail today and will post the results here as soon as I get them. If they can not resolve the issue, I will remove the xsd compiler binary from the package until the issue is resolved (the headers are still useful for building applications that come with pre-generated binding code). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 17:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 13:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141745.n5EHjKa5014073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #5 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-14 13:45:19 EDT --- hi, redone.. http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts.spec all results from the mock build are at: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/ofl-notcouriersans-fonts/ regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:29:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:29:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141829.n5EITRJx022084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #35 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-14 14:29:25 EDT --- Well, again the directory %{perl_vendorarch}/Goo/ should be owned by this package, so the %files entry should be: %files .... %{perl_vendorarch}/Goo/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:52:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:52:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460600] Review Request: msp430-binutils - Cross compiling binutils targeted at the msp430 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141852.n5EIqIWB026328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460600 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 14:52:14 EDT --- There is already a F-11 branch here... make sure you do 'cvs update -d' to get new directories... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:54:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141854.n5EIsM0a005020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 14:54:21 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141858.n5EIw1je005836@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 14:58:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:56:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:56:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141856.n5EIum7b005702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 14:56:47 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:55:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:55:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] New: Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Summary: Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: zdzichu at irc.pl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://pipebreaker.pl/~zdzichu/pkgs/hdapsd.spec SRPM URL: https://pipebreaker.pl/~zdzichu/pkgs/hdapsd-20090401-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a disk protection user-space daemon. It monitors the acceleration values through the HDAPS/AMS interfaces and automatically initiates disk head parking if a fall or sliding of the laptop is detected. HDAPS is typically found in ThinkPad laptops and AMS in Apple laptops. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 18:59:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141859.n5EIxLHb027439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 14:59:20 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 19:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141901.n5EJ1jJK028123@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 15:01:44 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 19:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141902.n5EJ2e8w006773@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-14 15:02:39 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 19:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141937.n5EJbAUe013273@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 15:37:09 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 19:37:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141937.n5EJb1TL013207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 15:37:00 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 19:37:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:37:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141937.n5EJb5oi013238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 15:37:05 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 19:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 15:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505184] Review Request: xorriso - ISO 9660 image manipulation tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906141942.n5EJgncl014413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505184 --- Comment #21 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-14 15:42:48 EDT --- Please build srpms too, as not having them makes having a clean review system a PITA. Also, you are still missing the latter part of the install command as I said in #19, currently the build fails in RPM build errors: File not found: /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/xorriso-0.3.8-5.pl00.fc11.x86_64/usr/share/kde4/services/ServiceMenus/xorriso_servicemenu.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142004.n5EK4qE6018095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:03:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:03:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] New: Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-crpTag/zikula-module-crpTag.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-crpTag/zikula-module-crpTag-0.1.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: crpTag is a simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:07:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:07:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142007.n5EK7KHx018803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 16:07:19 EDT --- globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142007.n5EK7OPb018838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 16:07:24 EDT --- globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142007.n5EK7FOA018771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 16:07:14 EDT --- globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:42:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:42:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505942] Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142042.n5EKgkbc025077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505942 Paul W. Frields changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504066 AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us --- Comment #1 from Paul W. Frields 2009-06-14 16:42:45 EDT --- This will support the Zikula module "mediashare". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 20:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505942] New: Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505942 Summary: Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: stickster at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/php-LightweightPicasaAPI.spec SRPM URL: http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/php-LightweightPicasaAPI-3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PHP wrapper for Google's Picasa Data API, which is implemented using Atom feeds in XML. The package is meant to make it easy for PHP developers to integrate their own applications with Picasa. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 21:24:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:24:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505946] New: Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505946 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lee.brewer at charterinternet.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.holycrossep.org/fedora/zikula-module-menutree.spec SRPM URL: http://www.holycrossep.org/fedora/zikula-module-menutree-2.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu. Block management can be done through "drag and drop" method, and the whole process of creating a block can be done without page reloads. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 21:29:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142129.n5ELT7kC000630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #61 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-14 17:29:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #60, comment #59 and comment #56) 1. Thanks Michael for having shed light on this: that was what I was trying to say, but less successfully :) 2. OK, Chitlesh, I will not interfere with my own versions (which I use when reviewing packages), but will only suggest simple alterations. You are right, that's cleaner. 3. > IMO the Requires: atlas-devel, lapack-devel of armadillo-devel are probably > unnecessary. If one builds with > g++ -larmadillo > not with > g++ -llapack -latlas -larmadillo > then one doesn't need atlas-devel or lapack-devel and these can be safely > dropped, since armadillo acts as a wrapper for the atlas and lapack libraries. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRequires properly states "It is also a safety feature that prevents builds with that would not otherwise fail, but would be missing crucial features. For example, a graphical application may exclude PNG support after its configure script detects that libpng is not installed." And, in the Armadillo CMake configure script (CMakeLists.txt), the following excerpt: ----------------------------- IF(LAPACK_FOUND) SET(ARMA_USE_LAPACK true) ENDIF(LAPACK_FOUND) IF(BLAS_FOUND) SET(ARMA_USE_BLAS true) ENDIF(BLAS_FOUND) IF(Boost_FOUND) IF(Boost_MAJOR_VERSION GREATER 0) IF(Boost_MINOR_VERSION GREATER 33) SET(ARMA_USE_BOOST true) ENDIF(Boost_MINOR_VERSION GREATER 33) ENDIF(Boost_MAJOR_VERSION GREATER 0) ENDIF(Boost_FOUND) ----------------------------- suggests that, if Lapack, Blas and/or Boost are not found, then they are not used (and probably replaced by internal/workaround code). Hence, they should be listed as dependencies... of the building process, i.e., as 'BuildRequires:'. And, as mentioned by Michael, boost-devel should be present in the 'Requires:' line as well, as most of Boost is delivered as header files only, which cannot be detected properly by the building process scripts. In summary, we would have: -------------- BuildRequires: cmake, atlas-devel, lapack-devel, boost-devel %package devel # Comment justifying the use of a 'Requires:' line Requires: boost-devel -------------- Is that fine? Or did I miss something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 21:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142133.n5ELXkmE001545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 21:33:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:33:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142133.n5ELX81S001459@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro AssignedTo|wolfy at nobugconsulting.ro |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #26 from manuel wolfshant 2009-06-14 17:33:05 EDT --- I apologize but personal issues that need solving occupy a lot of the time which I would have liked to allocate to package review. Since I want to see this package in a faster line, I am retiring myself from reviewing it, hoping that someone (Jussi ? Parag ?) can take care of it in a quicker pace. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 21:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:33:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226407] Merge Review: sendmail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142133.n5ELXB0g022159@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226407 --- Comment #28 from Paul Howarth 2009-06-14 17:33:06 EDT --- The /etc/mail/make script handles the authinfo database but not the msp-authinfo database (see http://www.sendmail.org/m4/msp.html). Adding this line after the one that handles the authinfo database works for me: test -f msp-authinfo && makedb msp-authinfo.db && chown smmsp:smmsp msp-authinfo{,.db} && chmod 640 msp-authinfo{,.db} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 21:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 17:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142137.n5ELbZ3x002345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 --- Comment #1 from manuel wolfshant 2009-06-14 17:37:34 EDT --- Simon, are you sure that "NOTABUG" is not a better status than "WONTFIX" ? Usually "WONTFIX" is meant for unfixable bugs / RFEs etc. In the context of a new package it looks odd, IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 22:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142218.n5EMIUDX010164@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 Kyle VanderBeek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kylev at kylev.com --- Comment #5 from Kyle VanderBeek 2009-06-14 18:18:29 EDT --- I'm currently working on updating Pylons and dependencies to 0.9.7 in devel. There are quite a few bits that need updating, so it may take me a day or two. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 22:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142246.n5EMkXvG015384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 --- Comment #6 from Kyle VanderBeek 2009-06-14 18:46:32 EDT --- I looked at the decorator docs about compatability: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/decorator#compatibility-notes I then looked at the source for Pylons 0.9.7rc4 (current RPM) and 0.9.7 (what I'm working on) and neither version seems to run afoul of the changes. - decorator's get_info appears nowhere in pylons - decorator's new_wrapper appears nowhere in pylons - decorator's decorator is only used to wrap functions, no classes, and is never used to create a magic factory. This is based on code perusal, not testing, but I'd give it 90% certainty that Pylons will be fine in F-11 if we update the python-decorator package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 22:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142257.n5EMvokc004989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 18:57:49 EDT --- perl-Pod-Xhtml-1.59-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Xhtml-1.59-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142300.n5EN01BM017304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-14 19:00:00 EDT --- perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142313.n5ENDq6G020246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #20 from Christopher Brown 2009-06-14 19:13:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I filed a bug upstream regarding lack of tagging or any other way of marking > releases in their source: > https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511409 > > They said they were planning on getting their repository cleaned up this month > when talking to them in #ifolder. > > Right now it seems theres no good way to pull the source for a release. I was trying to put together a release from cvs/svn when I started this. Unfortunately I lost my progress as it was hosted on fedorapeople and this all seems to have disappeared. Probably needs re-working anyway in light of recent events but doing releases from vcs isn't that much harder than regular ones. There is guidance on the wiki for this. I was waiting to see how much of an effort Novell were _really_ going to put into reviving it - seems they're quite serious so will look at this in earnest soon, though anyone who thinks they can do a quick job of it is more than welcome. I maintain log4net in Fedora so one of the deps is already fulfilled. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] New: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Summary: Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module subclasses Module::Starter::Plugin::Template which in turn subclasses Module::Starter::Simple. This document only describes the methods which are overriden from those modules or are new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:49:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:49:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505956] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505956 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides syntax highlighting for Perl code. The design bias is roughly line-oriented and streamed (ie, processing a file line-by-line in a single pass). Provisions may be made in the future for tasks related to "back- tracking" (ie, re-doing a single line in the middle of a stream) such as speeding up state copying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:50:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:50:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505956] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142350.n5ENoVUA015164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505956 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:48:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:48:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906142348.n5ENm66F014493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |perl-Module-Starter-Plugin- |perl-Module-Starter-Plugin- |CGIApp |CGIApp - Template based | |module starter for CGI apps -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 14 23:49:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 19:49:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] New: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Summary: Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides syntax highlighting for Perl code. The design bias is roughly line-oriented and streamed (ie, processing a file line-by-line in a single pass). Provisions may be made in the future for tasks related to "back- tracking" (ie, re-doing a single line in the middle of a stream) such as speeding up state copying. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 00:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] New: Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Summary: Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kevin at tummy.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/supybot-meetbot/supybot-meetbot.spec SRPM URL: http://www.scrye.com/~kevin/fedora/supybot-meetbot/supybot-meetbot-0-0.1.20090614darcs.fc12.src.rpm Description: MeatBot is designed to assist in running meetings, taking notes, and so on. It is in pure python, as a plugin to supybot. However, there is a clear distinction between meeting-code and IRC-code, so it should be relatively easy to port to other bots. It is under the supybot license (3-clause BSD). There has not been a formal release yet, but upstream is ok with just packaging up a darcs checkout version now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150316.n5F3GNY9016934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:16:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:16:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] New: Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-MultiHook/zikula-module-MultiHook.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-MultiHook/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MultiHook started as a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module (replacing normal text with links), but in the meantime it can handle also abbreviations and acronyms (replacing text with abbr and acronym-tags) and it can also censor if wanted (replacing bad words with ***). Links, abbreviations, acronyms and bad words can be easily defined with some helpful Ajax functionality. MultiHook was the first module in the Zikula world to use Ajax for convenience. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150318.n5F3I09M024503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |505939 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:18:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:18:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150318.n5F3IA1Z024542@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-06-14 23:18:09 EDT --- I can't sponsor you, so this is a preliminary review. In the %changelog, you should probably use your name and email address, even though it was worked on as a group during a Docs FAD. rpmlint output: zikula-module-crpTag.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1) I don't see anything else, so those will need to be fixed and a formal review will need to be completed by a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150321.n5F3Lrdm025376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-06-14 23:21:52 EDT --- (prelim review, i'm not a sponsor, needs a formal review, etc) %changelog: Since you did this one yourself you most definitely need to change it to your name and email. %doc: There are a lot more docs available in the pndocs/ dir than what you have listed. rpmlint output: zikula-module-MultiHook.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 5, tab: line 1) zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/license.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/credits.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/changelog.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499486] Review Request: python-repoze-what-pylons - A plugin providing utilities for Pylons applications using repoze.what In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150338.n5F3cJfZ028295@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499486 --- Comment #7 from Brennan Ashton 2009-06-14 23:38:18 EDT --- I built the python-decorator 3.2 from f12 for this review, as well as a patched version of python-repoze-what (the package in testing has a simple spec file issue that is addressed in the review bug) [PASS] owns the directories it creates. [PASS] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. [PASS] no duplicates in %files. [PASS] file permissions are appropriate. [PASS] code, not content. [PASS] documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. [PASS] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. When the python-decorator issue is sorted out and spec file formatting issue in comment #3 are fixed I will APPROVE this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150345.n5F3jeBA029965@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-14 23:45:39 EDT --- 404 error on SRPM download. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:44:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:44:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150344.n5F3ibA1029440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 03:45:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 23:45:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150345.n5F3j4gM029787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:12:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:12:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150412.n5F4CVx9002275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 --- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-15 00:12:30 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-crpTag/zikula-module-crpTag.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-crpTag/zikula-module-crpTag-0.1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output is now clean (no errors or warnings). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150411.n5F4BBK5002095@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #2 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-15 00:11:04 EDT --- Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-MultiHook/zikula-module-MultiHook.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-MultiHook/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Fixed. No errors/warnings on rpmlint output. Thanks for the reminder! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505845] Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150418.n5F4IUPX027881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505845 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 00:18:29 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414176 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 997591ac5fd5ff05e76b62ce4d208f7bb993a434 hyph-cy.tex + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:19:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:19:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150419.n5F4JFHu027949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 00:19:14 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414174 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url f8061cb41dde2d9d028f8a5dc41e7e5390825dc1 Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave No tests defined for Syntax::Highlight::Perl::Improved extension. + Package perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Syntax::Highlight::Perl::Improved) Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505760] Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150418.n5F4IpMd003446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505760 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 00:18:50 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414184 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0b91dfcf6d1df77f66a32a3af09193c912f1af04 hyph-eu.tex + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505770] Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150418.n5F4If30003406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505770 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 00:18:40 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414182 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 03e3d7fddce6359a3e824e1e407bdcc8a33ba5dc hyph_gl.oxt + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505578] Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150419.n5F4J1RC003486@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505578 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 00:19:00 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414178 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3ce7ea2fd4640166ae416541651f5459bd56bfd0 hunspell-se.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:22:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:22:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150422.n5F4M6b5028671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:52:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:52:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150452.n5F4qfG8010171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 00:52:39 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414186 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4f794aa188c04abf5b7ec8bb20689a689371d8e1 acheck-rules_0.3.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. Should: 1) Source URL should be Source0: http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/acheck-rules/%{name}_%{version}.tar.gz 2) also I think you should remove following Requires: acheck -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 04:54:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 00:54:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150454.n5F4sEq3002115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #21 from Vilius ?umskas 2009-06-15 00:54:13 EDT --- I've just successfully compiled newest ifolder 3.7.2 (build 9169) from these SuSE rpms http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Mono:/UIA:/iFolder/MonoOpenSUSE_11.0/ on F11 and started to use it. So far so good. If anyone intrested I can share it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 05:32:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:32:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150532.n5F5WPwR018783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-15 01:32:24 EDT --- Fixed: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/acheck-rules.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: acheck-rules Short Description: Rules for acheck Owners: rakesh Branches: F-9 F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 05:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150554.n5F5sFFs023061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 01:54:14 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 05:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 01:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150553.n5F5rOmT022923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 01:53:23 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:10:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:10:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150610.n5F6A7ho026806@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #62 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-15 02:10:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #61) > In summary, we would have: > -------------- > BuildRequires: cmake, atlas-devel, lapack-devel, boost-devel > %package devel > # Comment justifying the use of a 'Requires:' line > Requires: boost-devel > -------------- > > Is that fine? Or did I miss something? No, you missed boost-devel which is needed if armadillo headers use boost classes / something else only available in the boost header files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150627.n5F6R0d0020739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 02:26:59 EDT --- Build failed at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414339 Add BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150631.n5F6VneP021775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:42:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:42:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150642.n5F6gPsS000483@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 02:42:24 EDT --- Here are my notes for this package: ! The timestamps in the source gem file are all wrong. Please ask upstream to correct this. ? rpmlint says rubygem-gettext_activerecord-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation Shouldn't the contents of this package be marked %doc ? * Please remove the binary .mo files in %prep ? The COPYING file you are packaging claims LGPL as the license. The source files say "You may redistribute it and/or modify it under the same license terms as Ruby." Meanwhile the license tag says "GPLv2 or Ruby" What's going on? :) ? What are these BuildRequires(check)'s for? (I never saw them before. And Fedora guidelines don't mention them) * A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. build.log says warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gettext_activerecord-2.0.4/test/test_parser.rb warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gettext_activerecord-2.0.4/test/test_validations.rb * The indentation seems wrong with this line * extract messages from models with the rake task. * Ruby packaging guidelines say that the %build section of the specfile should be empty and the install should be performed with the command gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0} Any reason why you are doing it differently? - koji rawhide build seems fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414345 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150641.n5F6f5t2032765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #12 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-15 02:41:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Here are my initial notes. I still have to check the licensing stuff, the doc > files and a few other things: > > * Please remove %{version} from URL. Isn't this the actual website? > http://code.enthought.com/projects/mayavi/ > > * Source0 gives 404. Also, could you use %{name} and %{version} in Source0 and > wherever else they can be used? > > ! Patches should be explained and be submitted to upstream and upstream tracker > links should be given (if available) as comments > > ? Is the group tag correct? > > * The BR's python-devel, python-setupdocs, python-Traits don't seem necessary. > The package builds the same way without them. > python-setupdocs is required (build fails without it): distutils.errors.DistutilsError: Could not find suitable distribution for Requirement.parse('setupdocs>=1.0') Other two are not required. Removed them. > * rpmlint says: > Mayavi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/mayavi/html/.buildinfo > Mayavi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/tvtk/html/.buildinfo > Can we get rid of these files? > Done. > ? What is this line for? > sed -i 's/\.dev$//g' > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitearch}/%{name}-%{version}-*.egg-info/requires.txt > It removes .dev for versions in requires.txt, it is a known upstream problem .. and is being taken care in svn. > ? What is this file that gets packaged? > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/Mayavi-3.2.0-py2.6-nspkg.pth > Python script to locate enthought modules. Required, did not checked details. > ! I don't think we need this anymore: > # unstripped-binary-or-object > #chmod +x $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitearch}/enthought/tvtk/array_ext.so > If you want to keep it, please escape the macro with an extra % > removed. > - koji rawhide and F-10 seem fine > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408825 > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1408830 > > ? There is this release dependent BR: > %if 0%{?fedora} >= 11 > BuildRequires: numpy-f2py > %else > BuildRequires: numpy > %endif > Also there is this release independent R: > Requires: numpy > Is there an inconsistency here? > No, actually in F-11 distutils sub package was moved to numpy-f2py but numpy still has it for other stable releases. It is a BR. But mayavi still uses numpy for functioning (array calculations), which is a R. > ! It seems like the description is made to span 70 columns. Can you make it > span 80 columns instead (as far as possible)? > I tried doing it .. but it messes it up, my emacs adjusted it better so I have left it that way. > * Package requires > python-Traits >= 3.1.0 > python-TraitsBackendQt >= 3.1.0 > Can you add these versioned dependencies? > fixed. > * Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file > (which applies to both the mayavi2 and tvtk_doc executables), and that file > must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. > Follow: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets > > * Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. > This package owns > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/enthought/ > which is also owned by python-Traits. This needs attention. > Fixed. > * tvtk_doc exits via segmentation fault. It works on my F11, tested on F10 also, may you paste the error message or any crash dump ? I was not able to reproduce. Will update once issues in other comments are also fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150644.n5F6ik2l000860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-15 02:44:45 EDT --- My bad. That should be: Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module subclasses Module::Starter::Plugin::Template which in turn subclasses Module::Starter::Simple. This document only describes the methods which are overriden from those modules or are new. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150649.n5F6nIjo025024@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 02:49:16 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414340 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url. + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Should: 1) change %define to %global APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:54:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:54:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150654.n5F6s3dD026052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-15 02:54:02 EDT --- Thanks for the review. Asking for cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved Short Description: Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 06:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 02:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150658.n5F6wpIt004026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 02:58:50 EDT --- Alright thanks. This is the gdb backtrace when I exit via tvtk_doc OK or Cancel Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x000000320101362d in fini_context_translations () at setrans_client.c:243 243 free(prev_r2t_trans); It is selinux related. I don't know what is wrong. I made a fresh F-11 install last week. I will try this on an F-10 box tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:04:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:04:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150704.n5F74JUV028105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 03:02:26 EDT --- eview: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414354 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e5bab1d5d4fcf419b5b3f193ee8fe59d1688ae2c Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=7, Tests=97, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.08 usr 0.01 sys + 1.44 cusr 0.12 csys = 1.65 CPU) + Package perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-1.fc10 => Provides: perl(Module::Starter::Plugin::CGIApp) = 0.10 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(English) perl(ExtUtils::Command) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Spec) perl(HTML::Template) perl(Module::Starter) perl(Module::Starter::App) perl(Module::Starter::Simple) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:05:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:05:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150705.n5F75kor005788@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #36 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-15 03:05:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #34) > you have small typo in %description you say that you have small tupo in %description. What do you mean? Do you mean that %description should be longer? Would I add this paragraph into %description? GTK+ does't has an buildin canvas widget. GooCanvas is wonderful. It is easy to use and has powerful and extensible way to create items in canvas. Just try it. For more documents, please read GooCanvas Manual and the demo programs provided in the source distribution in both perl-Goo::Canvas and GooCanvas. Or do you mean that I should set every line of %description longer than the present version? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:15:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:15:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150715.n5F7FVJl030647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |505995 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:18:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:18:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150718.n5F7IqJZ031182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-15 03:18:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > ? What is this file that gets packaged? > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/Mayavi-3.2.0-py2.6-nspkg.pth > Removed. (In reply to comment #11) > Here is the rest of the review: > > * As indicated by LICENSE_COLORBREWER.txt, parts of the file > enthought/mayavi/core/lut/pylab_luts.py is distributed under ASL 1.1 and it > should be added to the license tag. > Done. > * image_LICENSE.txt says > "Crystal: LGPL license as described in icon_LICENSE_CP.txt" > but icon_LICENSE_CP.txt contains the full text of GPLv2. Can you ask this > upstream for clarification? Even if they say it is LGPL, we cannot ship this > icon_LICENSE_CP.txt file as it is wrong. > Will remove after asking from upstream after clearing doubts. > * image_LICENSE_OOo is LGPLv3+ and this has to be added to the license tag. > I think LGPLv2+ (as it has or later) covers LGPLv3+ also. Or am I wrong ? > * docs/mayavi2.man should be packaged. Is this a man1? Yes included. > > ? Is the documentation under docs/source/ worth packaging? Yes included Will updated, once I get confirmation from upstream about license. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150719.n5F7JjIh008553@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #15 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-15 03:19:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Alright thanks. This is the gdb backtrace when I exit via tvtk_doc OK or Cancel > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x000000320101362d in fini_context_translations () at setrans_client.c:243 > 243 free(prev_r2t_trans); > > It is selinux related. I don't know what is wrong. I made a fresh F-11 install > last week. > > I will try this on an F-10 box tomorrow. Will try to reproduce and report upstream. Somehow I was not able to reproduce again. :( Checking ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:35:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:35:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150735.n5F7ZPbe012358@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-15 03:35:24 EDT --- Luckily and unknowningly I already packaged hscolour so it is already there. So please update ghc-haskell-src-exts. :) Jens -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:34:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:34:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150734.n5F7YHpk011807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-15 03:34:16 EDT --- Thanks. Requesting fedora-cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp Short Description: Template based module starter for CGI apps Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:40:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:40:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150740.n5F7ediK013622@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-15 03:40:38 EDT --- Ok, cool. It is late here, I will do this when I wake up tomorrow :). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150747.n5F7lY50005215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #37 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-15 03:47:33 EDT --- no, you have "does't" and probably you mean "doesn't". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 07:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 03:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150748.n5F7mAQi005323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-15 03:48:09 EDT --- Hi: (In reply to comment #2) > ! The timestamps in the source gem file are all wrong. Please ask upstream to > correct this. - This is rather the issue on "gem", not this gem specific. > ? rpmlint says > rubygem-gettext_activerecord-doc.noarch: W: no-documentation > Shouldn't the contents of this package be marked %doc ? - I don't think it is needed to mark as %doc the files in the rpm which is already declared as "document rpm" > * Please remove the binary .mo files in %prep - Done at %build > ? The COPYING file you are packaging claims LGPL as the license. > The source files say "You may redistribute it and/or modify it under the same > license terms as Ruby." > Meanwhile the license tag says "GPLv2 or Ruby" > What's going on? :) - Actually from the source code this is licensed under the same license as ruby. Note that ruby is licensed under "GPLv2 or Ruby" (well, a little complicated...), so the license tag should be so. > ? What are these BuildRequires(check)'s for? (I never saw them before. And > Fedora guidelines don't mention them) - The intention for this is that "These BuildRequires is needed only for %check". > * A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. > build.log says > warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gettext_activerecord-2.0.4/test/test_parser.rb > warning: File listed twice: > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/gettext_activerecord-2.0.4/test/test_validations.rb - See the test case bug 505995. I thought this worked as expected. Workarround applied. > * The indentation seems wrong with this line > * extract messages from models with the rake task. - Fixed. > * Ruby packaging guidelines say that the %build section of the specfile should > be empty and the install should be performed with the command > gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0} > Any reason why you are doing it differently? - Actually it is under discussion whether "gem install" should completely moved from %install to %prep or %build. This suggestion was from other people but now I also think that "gem install" should not done at %install directly because: - Actually when gem creates C module extension, rubygem guideline already says "gem --install" should be done at %build because of creating debuginfo rpm correctly (and this proposal was from me) - For this package, spec file contains %check. When gem is installed under %buildroot, %check must be done also under %buildroot. This is troublesome when %check (for this package "rake test") creates some additional files because this will cause some unneeded filed to be packaged or causes "installed but not packaged" error. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord-2.0.4-3.fc.src.rpm * Mon Jun 15 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.4-3 - Recreate gettext mo files (BR: rubygem(gettext)) - Change BR: ruby(sqlite) -> rubygem(sqlite3-ruby) - Some cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505845] Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150804.n5F84tC0009647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505845 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-15 04:04:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-cy Short Description: Welsh hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:01:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:01:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150801.n5F81tXv008940@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 Shakthi Kannan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(shakthimaan at gmail | |.com) | --- Comment #16 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-06-15 04:01:53 EDT --- No Internet connectivity for the system that I have my Fedora certificate and ssh key with, for the past few days. Will do so by this coming weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:04:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505770] Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150804.n5F84FGS019678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505770 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-15 04:04:14 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-gl Short Description: Galician hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:03:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:03:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505760] Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150803.n5F83RBx019537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505760 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-15 04:03:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hyphen-eu Short Description: Basque hyphenation rules Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:17:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:17:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150817.n5F8HKTO023049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #63 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-15 04:17:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #60) > IMO the Requires: atlas-devel, lapack-devel of armadillo-devel are probably > unnecessary. If one builds with > g++ -larmadillo > not with > g++ -llapack -latlas -larmadillo > then one doesn't need atlas-devel or lapack-devel and these can be safely > dropped, since armadillo acts as a wrapper for the atlas and lapack libraries. Agreed to omitting lapack-devel. However, we need atlas-devel. Atlas headers are included by Armadillo headers. (line 85 of upstream include/armadillo, where a workaround for Ubuntu and other systems is present). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:02:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:02:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505578] Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150802.n5F82LH4019329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505578 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-15 04:02:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-se Short Description: Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: caolanm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150835.n5F8ZJ2A026969@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #64 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-15 04:35:00 EDT --- Updated spec and SRPM: http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo.spec http://arma.sf.net/fedora/armadillo-0.6.11-8.fc10.src.rpm Spec file summary: main package: BuildRequires: cmake, boost-devel, lapack-devel, atlas-devel devel package: Requires: boost-devel, atlas-devel (and a note explaining why they're needed) install section: rm -f examples/Makefile.cmake I think these satisfy everyone's concerns. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:46:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:46:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] New: Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package makes testing CGIApp based modules fast and easy. It takes advantage of Test::WWW::Mechanize to provide functions for common web testing scenarios. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:48:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:48:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150848.n5F8mG7m019950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |wrappers around all the | |subroutines in packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/perl-Sub-WrapPackages.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Sub-WrapPackages/perl-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is mostly a wrapper around Damian Conway's Hook::LexWrap module. This module allows you to wrap function calls and exits with functions of your choice. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:52:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:52:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150852.n5F8qCCI030999@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 08:52:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 04:52:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150852.n5F8qTdk020952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:05:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150905.n5F95WMW024032@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-15 05:05:30 EDT --- > > > * image_LICENSE.txt says > > "Crystal: LGPL license as described in icon_LICENSE_CP.txt" > > but icon_LICENSE_CP.txt contains the full text of GPLv2. Can you ask this > > upstream for clarification? Even if they say it is LGPL, we cannot ship this > > icon_LICENSE_CP.txt file as it is wrong. > > > > Will remove after asking from upstream after clearing doubts. > The only issue here was that all files named icon_*.txt in file are actually image_*.txt files. But image_LICENSE_CP.txt is not GPL, it is LGPL ? May you recheck and confirm ? Wrong naming, I have fixed. So, to me only issue remaining is crash .. I will am checking whether I can reproduce it. Once that is done will update. Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150917.n5F9HLol026798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #17 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-15 05:17:20 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-3.fc11.src.rpm http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec Fixed All .. not able to reproduce crash :( May you check whether there is any other issues remaining ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226429] Merge Review: sqlite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150928.n5F9StXw007081@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226429 --- Comment #21 from Panu Matilainen 2009-06-15 05:28:52 EDT --- Wohoo :) Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150939.n5F9d1uG031916@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 05:39:00 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414513 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 5caa9fe9ec918ad75657228ae0a41ac0a5efb108 Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=39, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.01 sys + 1.29 cusr 0.12 csys = 1.48 CPU) + Package perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Test::WWW::Mechanize::CGIApp) = 0.05 Requires: perl(HTTP::Request::AsCGI) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application When I try to install this package, I saw we need to add Requires: perl(CGI::Application) Requires: perl(Test::WWW::Mechanize) Requires: perl(Test::More) yum does not pick it up automatically. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:39:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:39:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150939.n5F9dsPP009507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 05:39:53 EDT --- pokerth-0.7-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pokerth-0.7-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:40:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150940.n5F9eBmV032621@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 05:40:10 EDT --- xdrfile-1.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdrfile-1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:41:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:41:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150941.n5F9fZc1000552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 05:41:34 EDT --- xdrfile-1.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xdrfile-1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 09:43:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 05:43:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906150943.n5F9h5CT010532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-15 05:43:04 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414511 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e93348e9d3d4cec8629f95509ab5cc949b7b0008 Sub-WrapPackages-1.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=4, Tests=10, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.00 sys + 0.10 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.17 CPU) + Package perl-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Sub::WrapPackages) = 1.2 Requires: perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Hook::LexWrap) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 11:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 07:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151148.n5FBmbCJ007531@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #34 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-15 07:48:27 EDT --- The software does use fontconfig so the X side is OK AFAIK, the problem is in GL/postscript output. The major places that ttf files are requested directly that I can see are in: http://root.cern.ch/viewvc/trunk/graf2d/graf/src/TTF.cxx where freetype is used to load a font by path/name or number (MS with fallback to Free fonts). http://root.cern.ch/viewvc/trunk/graf3d/gl/src/TGLText.cxx where ftgl is used to load a font by fontnumber (table uses only MS fonts). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:21:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:21:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151221.n5FCLaMS017023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #38 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-15 08:21:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=347924) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347924) perl-Goo-Canvas 0.06-2 spec Now I upload the latest spec file Jan Klepek, Now is %description right? Mamoru Tasaka, Now I correct %file %{perl_vendorarch}/Goo/ is here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451744] Review Request: root - The CERN analyzer for high to medium energy physics In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151224.n5FCOXDc017734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451744 --- Comment #35 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-06-15 08:24:30 EDT --- sorry I was wrong root uses freetype but not fontconfig, so as I see it the plan should be * quick solution: point root to the DejaVu fonts and check that it still works OK * add fontconfig support -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151231.n5FCV17A019592@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |david at gnsa.us Blocks| |505940 Depends on| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151232.n5FCWkSS019864@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 Cristian Ciupitu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cristian.ciupitu at yahoo.com --- Comment #9 from Cristian Ciupitu 2009-06-15 08:32:44 EDT --- Are you sure about the "BuildRequires: python-setuptools-devel" dependency? I was able to build the RPM without it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] New: Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Summary: Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-scribite/zikula-module-scribite.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-scribite/zikula-module-scribite-3.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: scribite! is a module for easy integration of WYSIWYG scripts Xinha, TinyMCE, FCKeditor, openWYSIWYG, NicEdit or YUI Rich Text Editor into textarea fields in order to make text editing a little bit nicer and more comfortable for users. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:39:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:39:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151239.n5FCdnL3010852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |guido.grazioli at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Guido Grazioli 2009-06-15 08:39:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Since this is currently a package review ticket, and a package isn't actually > being submitted here, I can only close it. I would try to assign it to a more > appropriate component, except that it started at "kernel" for some reason. > > Bottom line: Fedora is a community project. If someone steps up to maintain > the package, they can open a proper package review ticket and, once the review > process is done, the package can reappear in Fedora. Without a maintainer, the > package can't be in the distro. I have an approved package review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 should i ask for a cvs change package or cvs new package admin request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226117] Merge Review: mailman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151247.n5FClOVx023610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226117 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla 2009-06-15 08:47:22 EDT --- Now I get this on the SRPM: mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-crontab-edit 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-migrate-fhs 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. mailman.src: W: strange-permission mailman-update-cfg 0755 A file that you listed to include in your package has strange permissions. Usually, a file should have 0644 permissions. mailman.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 63, tab: line 172) The specfile mixes use of spaces and tabs for indentation, which is a cosmetic annoyance. Use either spaces or tabs for indentation, not both. and the same as #9 on the RPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 12:45:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 08:45:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465534] Resurrect awesfx package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151245.n5FCj8gb012672@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465534 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-15 08:45:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > I have an approved package review here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 > > should i ask for a cvs change package or cvs new package admin request? There is a CVS module for the package, so I'd say a cvs change request, but in any case it's done by the CVS admin who will surely do the right thing even if you make a new package admin request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 14:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226330] Merge Review: pychecker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151426.n5FEQtTI018103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226330 Vitezslav Crhonek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Vitezslav Crhonek 2009-06-15 10:26:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > - Drop > Requires: python > and > BuildRequires: python > since both of these are redundant (first is automatically picked up and second > is a requirement of python-devel). Fixed. > > - Remove > CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" > from the build phase since this is a noarch package. Fixed. > > ** > > rpmlint output: > pychecker.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot A python source code checking tool. > pychecker.noarch: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/Stack.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/OP.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/pychecker-0.8.17/MAINTAINERS > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/warn.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/printer.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/CodeChecks.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/Warning.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/msgs.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/utils.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/Config.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/checker.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/function.py 0644 > pychecker.noarch: E: non-executable-script > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/pychecker/python.py 0644 > pychecker.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot A python source code checking tool. > pychecker.src: E: tag-not-utf8 %changelog > pychecker.src: E: non-utf8-spec-file > /tmp/rpmlint.pychecker-0.8.17-8.fc10.src.rpm.t9ghWq/pychecker.spec > 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 3 warnings. > > - Fix the above. You can get rid of the non-executable script errors by > removing the shebang with sed in the setup phase, e.g. > sed -i -e '1d' pychecker/checker.py Fixed. > > - Maybe add "-O1 --skip-build" to the install argument of setup.py? There are problems with '--skip-build'. > > MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used > consistently. OK > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK > MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK > MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the > Licensing Guidelines. OK > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > OK > - Source code contains no license heders, please ask upstream to add them. > > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. OK > MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK > MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. OK > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. OK > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. OK > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK > MUST: Clean section exists. OK > MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. OK > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. OK > MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. OK > MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. OK > MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK > MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files > ending in .so must go in a -devel package. OK > MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base > package using a fully versioned dependency. OK > MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK > MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. OK > MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK > MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK > SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. OK > SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 14:44:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:44:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226330] Merge Review: pychecker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151444.n5FEieRc011876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226330 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-15 10:44:39 EDT --- Okay. Everything seems OK, but I can't check the rpmlint warnings since you haven't built the package in rawhide. Those were minor issues anyway. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 15:16:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:16:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] New: Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Summary: Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tjarls at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp.spec SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp-0.10.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: OpenNHRP implements NBMA Next Hop Resolution Protocol (as defined in RFC 2332). It makes it possible to create dynamic multipoint VPN Linux router using NHRP, GRE and IPsec. It aims to be Cisco DMVPN compatible. As this is my first package submission, I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 15:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151517.n5FFHrga031321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Charles Lopes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 15:29:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:29:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151529.n5FFTU8W001500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 Lorenzo Villani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lvillani at binaryhelix.net --- Comment #6 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-15 11:29:29 EDT --- Today I tried to install this package but mojomojo refused to start because perl-JSON was not installed. On a side note: I also had to make /var/lib/mojomojo/{index,upload} writable for the apache user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 16:14:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:14:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151614.n5FGEZZS012221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |awilliam at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-15 12:14:33 EDT --- it'd be nice for this review to get resurrected - I used congruity this weekend but had to download it manually. it'd be good for congruity to ship a configuration file to make browsers use it for *.EZ* files automatically, but I'm not sure if that's possible, because they use generic MIME types: [root at adam tmp]# file --mime-type *.EZ* Connectivity-1.EZHex: application/xml Connectivity-2.EZHex: application/xml Connectivity-3.EZHex: application/xml Connectivity.EZHex: application/xml ConnectivitySimple-1.EZHex: application/xml ConnectivitySimple-2.EZHex: application/xml ConnectivitySimple-3.EZHex: application/xml ConnectivitySimple.EZHex: application/xml LatestFirmware.EZUp: text/html Update-1.EZHex: application/xml Update-2.EZHex: application/xml Update.EZHex: application/xml and I'm not sure if you can package a file to tell browsers to open a certain file type with a certain program _by extension_ rather than MIME type (which is obviously what happens in Windows). I've asked caillon if he can help answer that question... -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 16:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151623.n5FGNVws014177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #72 from David Halik 2009-06-15 12:23:28 EDT --- 1.2 is due out shortly. I'll remove the $ORIGIN rpath in the next build and repost. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 16:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151629.n5FGTBSU003780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #39 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-15 12:29:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #38) > Created an attachment (id=347924) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=347924) [details] > perl-Goo-Canvas 0.06-2 spec > > Now I upload the latest spec file > > Jan Klepek, > > Now is %description right? Did you uploaded correct version? I see in your attachment "does't" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 16:46:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 12:46:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151646.n5FGkxma007719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #4 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 12:46:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hi: Hi, thanks for the update! > (In reply to comment #2) > > ? The COPYING file you are packaging claims LGPL as the license. > > The source files say "You may redistribute it and/or modify it under the > > same license terms as Ruby." > > Meanwhile the license tag says "GPLv2 or Ruby" > > What's going on? :) > - Actually from the source code this is licensed under the same > license as ruby. Note that ruby is licensed under "GPLv2 or Ruby" > (well, a little complicated...), so the license tag should > be so. > Okay, but the COPYING file that is being packaged says LGPL, which is wrong according to what you say. Shouldn't we drop the wrong COPYING file? > > ? What are these BuildRequires(check)'s for? (I never saw them before. And > > Fedora guidelines don't mention them) > - The intention for this is that "These BuildRequires is needed only > for %check". > Thanks. Now the package fails to build on F-11 + rake --trace makemo /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qYI3ky: line 41: rake: command not found I moved rubygem(rake) from BR(check) to regular BR, but then I got + rake --trace makemo /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31: command not found: allison --path I couldn't figure out what package provides allison on F-11. > > > * Ruby packaging guidelines say that the %build section of the specfile > > should be empty and the install should be performed with the command > > gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force > > %{SOURCE0} > > Any reason why you are doing it differently? > - Actually it is under discussion whether "gem install" should completely > moved from %install to %prep or %build. This suggestion was from other > people but now I also think that "gem install" should not done at %install > directly > because: > - Actually when gem creates C module extension, rubygem guideline > already says "gem --install" should be done at %build because > of creating debuginfo rpm correctly (and this proposal was > from me) > - For this package, spec file contains %check. When gem is installed > under %buildroot, %check must be done also under %buildroot. > This is troublesome when %check (for this package "rake test") creates > some additional files because this will cause some unneeded filed > to be packaged or causes "installed but not packaged" error. > Do you know by any chance when these changes in the guidelines will be approved? I can't find the relevant discussion. Maybe I'm looking at the wrong mailing lists. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151721.n5FHLdoP028018@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:21:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:20:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:20:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151720.n5FHKNYQ027835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:20:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:19:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:19:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151719.n5FHJhdR027311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:19:42 EDT --- F-9 branches are no longer permitted. Otherwise, CVS is done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:25:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:25:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505770] Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151725.n5FHPvZR029213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505770 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:25:56 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505760] Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151724.n5FHOAJn028517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505760 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:24:09 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505578] Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151723.n5FHNTJX028408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505578 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:23:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505845] Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151726.n5FHQVGm017238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505845 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-15 13:26:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:26:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:26:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151726.n5FHQnHB017319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-15 13:26:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #2) > > > ? The COPYING file you are packaging claims LGPL as the license. > > > The source files say "You may redistribute it and/or modify it under the > > > same license terms as Ruby." > > > Meanwhile the license tag says "GPLv2 or Ruby" > > > What's going on? :) > > - Actually from the source code this is licensed under the same > > license as ruby. Note that ruby is licensed under "GPLv2 or Ruby" > > (well, a little complicated...), so the license tag should > > be so. > > > > Okay, but the COPYING file that is being packaged says LGPL, which is wrong > according to what you say. Shouldn't we drop the wrong COPYING file? - Removed. > Thanks. Now the package fails to build on F-11 > + rake --trace makemo > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.qYI3ky: line 41: rake: command not found - Ah.. fixed. > I moved rubygem(rake) from BR(check) to regular BR, but then I got > + rake --trace makemo > /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:31: command not > found: allison --path > > I couldn't figure out what package provides allison on F-11. - allison is not packaged on Fedora yet (and I have not checked the dependency...) > Do you know by any chance when these changes in the guidelines will be > approved? I can't find the relevant discussion. Maybe I'm looking at the wrong > mailing lists. - Well, I will re-propose this later on fedora-packaging (after I write a draft: formal proposal needs a draft). http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord-2.0.4-4.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord.spec * Tue Jun 16 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.4-4 - Remove COPYING for now - Change BR: now rubygem(rake) is needed to create gettext mo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 17:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 13:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151735.n5FHZxE7031765@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-15 13:35:58 EDT --- http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_rails-2.0.4-3.fc.src.rpm http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_rails.spec * Tue Jun 16 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.4-3 - Remove COPYING for now - Recreate gettext .mo file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 18:07:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:07:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151807.n5FI72Sd006610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 14:07:02 EDT --- Thank you. But this still fails to build on F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415248 I don't understand why, it builds fine on rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 18:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151817.n5FIHLk4009098@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136 --- Comment #2 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) 2009-06-15 14:17:20 EDT --- Hi Jussi, Thanks very much for reviewing this. Sorry it has taken me a little while to respond! I've updated the spec and SRPM: http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync.spec http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync-0.43.0-2.fc11.src.rpm * Summary for libs - you're right. I've tried to write something better. * target platform bits - I've had to do a push/pop because csync doesn't allow in-source builds, only out-of-source. I'm not sure the KDE4 cmake macro helps in this regard; https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE gives a similar "Best practice" (see bottom of page). The alternative would be to patch the build system, which would be possible, but isn't a system tested by upstream. * devel requires - yes, you're right again :) * need for -libs - I plan on packaging the pam-csync module, which uses the libraries rather than the binary, hence the separation. * directory ownership - again, you're right: sorry, I'm not sure how I missed that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 18:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:16:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151816.n5FIGhtS028951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at traylen.net --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-15 14:16:42 EDT --- Hi Charles, I cannot sponsor you but I can hopefully provide some useful comments: "libcares.so.2()(64bit)" is picked up as a dependency so "c-ares" is not needed as a Requirement. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires There are a few rpmlint errors that look to need clearing up: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/opennhrp-0.10.3-3.fc11.x86_64.rpm opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrp.8.gz opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrp-script.8.gz opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man5/opennhrp.conf.5.gz opennhrp.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man8/opennhrpctl.8.gz opennhrp.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/opennhrp/opennhrp.conf opennhrp.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang /etc/opennhrp/opennhrp.conf 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 4 warnings. you can details on any particular message with: $ rpmlint -I "executable-marked-as-config-file" Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 18:26:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:26:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498723] Review Request: eZ Publish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151826.n5FIQbdw011830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498723 --- Comment #6 from Guillaume Kulakowski 2009-06-15 14:26:35 EDT --- > The source URL (http://ez.no/content/download/261295/1832505/version/3/file/ezpublish-4.1.0-gpl.tar.gz) > causes an error. 4.1.1 is also the current version 4.1.0 seems to be > un-available. There is no rules for the next release URL. > Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/Archive) > Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/ConsoleTools) > Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/File) > Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/SystemInformation) > Requires: php-pear(components.ez.no/Webdav) > are also not necessary. eZ Publish use this eZ Components, it's some dependence. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 18:56:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 14:56:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151856.n5FIusdw018769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-15 14:56:53 EDT --- Ah.. http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord.spec http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/Ruby_on_Rails/rubygem-gettext_activerecord-2.0.4-5.fc.src.rpm * Tue Jun 16 2009 Mamoru Tasaka - 2.0.4-5 - More BR: rubygem(activerecord) for recreating mo files dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415364 dist-f11-updates-candidate: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415362 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151911.n5FJBnt7011117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 15:11:47 EDT --- Thanks. One last question: >From the SPEC file: %global activerecord_req 2.3.2 ... %description gettext_activerecord provides the localization for ActiveRecord-2.2 or later using Ruby-GetText-Package. There is a discrepancy here on version number. Am I missing something? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:15:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:15:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151915.n5FJF8DD023929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 15:15:07 EDT --- Well, that is not a blocker. You can answer it later. --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-gettext_activerecord) is APPROVED by oget --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:31:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:31:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151931.n5FJV9V5019438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-15 15:31:08 EDT --- Thank you for quick review! (In reply to comment #8) > %global activerecord_req 2.3.2 > ... > %description > gettext_activerecord provides the localization for ActiveRecord-2.2 or later > using Ruby-GetText-Package. I will remove "-2.2 or later" part. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gettext_activerecord Short Description: Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:48:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151948.n5FJmYCx025669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #18 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-15 15:48:33 EDT --- I tested this on F-10 and got the same segmentation fault. But the crash is on exit and doesn't affect the application during runtime. Meanwhile, as we discussed, the missing things in the specfile are the .desktop files, the Group tag and the license thing ("... and LGPLv3+"). I was confused by the image_LICENSE_CP.txt file. Yes it is LGPL, so we don't have a problem there. What confused me was the license title inside the file is "GNU General Public License" whereas the text below is LGPL. It would be good to let upstream know about this confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:50:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:50:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151950.n5FJokqq006656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #65 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-15 15:50:44 EDT --- The following shows that both lapack-devel and blas-devel contain only symbolic links on libraries and static libraries, but no header files: ---------------------------------------- $ rpm -ql lapack-devel /usr/lib64/liblapack.a /usr/lib64/liblapack.so /usr/lib64/liblapack_pic.a $ rpm -ql blas-devel /usr/lib64/libblas.a /usr/lib64/libblas.so ---------------------------------------- So, if I am not mistaken, armadillo-devel does not need to list those development packages in the 'Requires:' statement. Of course, they are needed when building the Armadillo packages, but not any longer after that (they are not needed by someone wanting to develop with armadillo-devel). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:50:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:50:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492815] Review Request: fife - Cross platform game creation framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151950.n5FJo9R4026647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492815 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-15 15:50:08 EDT --- i decided "won't fix", because there are a lot of open questions and fixes which shall be done for this package, which I can't do. (perhabs cantfix???) for exmple: settings.xml must be writeable to adopt changes in settings.xml done by the settingsmenu in the client, because there will be non settings.xml in the users home. and many many more problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151941.n5FJfBSH002263@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #47 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-15 15:41:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #46) > Excellent. Mauricio, please go to the account system and apply for the packager > group: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ mmm, kind of lost here, I have a fedora account but I supose to "join a group"?, is that is the case, what is the mono group name? > > I'll sponsor you in and then you can import and build your packages. great.. > > Paul has agreed to guide you in your work (since I don't do very much with mono > packaging) so when you do your cvs request you can put him on the package as > well. > more great... > Note that once I've sponsored you, you'll be on step #4 here: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process don't know what to do with that :-S ...thanks Toshio... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 19:58:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:58:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906151958.n5FJwow2028332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at traylen.net --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-15 15:58:49 EDT --- Hi Thomasz, I am not able to sponsor you but I can hopefully offer some comments. There are some rpmlint errors: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/hdapsd-20090401-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm hdapsd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/event.d/hdapsd hdapsd.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/udev/rules.d/99-hdapsd.rules 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. which to me look like they could and should be fixed. Maybe add a %doc README AUTHORS ChangeLog .... these files never do any harm to be included. Steve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:03:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:03:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152003.n5FK3g8U030290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-15 16:03:41 EDT --- (By the way I packaged rubygem-allison as bug 506168, not strictly needed for this package, though) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506168] New: Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-allison/rubygem-allison.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-allison/rubygem-allison-2.0.3-2.fc.src.rpm Description: A modern, pretty RDoc template. Koji scratch build F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415422 F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415462 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:04:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:04:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505578] Review Request: hunspell-se - Northern Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152004.n5FK45Nj010021@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505578 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:09:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:09:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152009.n5FK9DPX011310@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #66 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-15 16:09:12 EDT --- Whoa, this review is unusually long. A lot of static, though. (In reply to comment #65) > The following shows that both lapack-devel and blas-devel contain only symbolic > links on libraries and static libraries, but no header files: clip > So, if I am not mistaken, armadillo-devel does not need to list those > development packages in the 'Requires:' statement. Of course, they are needed > when building the Armadillo packages, but not any longer after that (they are > not needed by someone wanting to develop with armadillo-devel). And they are not, as you could have seen in #64. The only packages required by -devel are boost-devel and atlas-devel, which both contain headers that are used by the armadillo headers. libstdc++-devel should probably be required too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505760] Review Request: hyphen-eu - Basque hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152012.n5FKC1u0000473@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505760 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:17:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:17:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505845] Review Request: hyphen-cy - Welsh hyphenation patterns In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152017.n5FKH25R001797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505845 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505770] Review Request: hyphen-gl - Galician hyphenation rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152018.n5FKId5X013790@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505770 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152043.n5FKh1u4023393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #2 from Charles Lopes 2009-06-15 16:43:00 EDT --- Thank you Steve. I have updated the spec file: Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp.spec SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/tjarls/fedora/opennhrp-0.10.3-4.fc11.src.rpm I used rpmlint on the spec file only and forgot to run it on the rpm. That will teach me about rushing the package cleanup. I corrected the license tag as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152053.n5FKruJn026921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-06-15 16:53:55 EDT --- Sorry, I missed the URL to the spec file. The correct one is: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/attachment/ticket/23/qtdmm.6.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:38:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:38:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152038.n5FKcqnT008731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #22 from Christopher Brown 2009-06-15 16:38:49 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I've just successfully compiled newest ifolder 3.7.2 (build 9169) from these > SuSE rpms > http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/Mono:/UIA:/iFolder/MonoOpenSUSE_11.0/ > on F11 and started to use it. So far so good. If anyone intrested I can share > it. The spec file would be good. Thanks to the fedora infrastructure team I was able to recover my old data so the original link now works again :) However it is outdated - I'll try compiling again and then updating shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:57:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152057.n5FKvcWq016529@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #23 from Vilius ?umskas 2009-06-15 16:57:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348006) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348006) spec file for build 9169 Here you go. Also I had to apply libflaim patch for this ticket. Included gSOAP seem to compile fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:42:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:42:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] New: Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ko.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ko-0.2.4-1.fc11.noarch.rpm Description: Korean hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 20:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 16:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] New: Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 Summary: Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: anpaza at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/attachment/ticket/23/qtdmm.5.spec SRPM URL: http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: QtDMM is a DMM readout software including a configurable recorder. The recorder features manual start, scheduled start (at a given time), triggered automatic start when given thresholds are reached, and the ability to display more than one value from the multimeter. It was written for Metex (and compatible like VOLTCRAFT) multimeter which use an 14 byte protocol. Later several more protocols have been added. # rpmlint qtdmm-0.8.12-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Respective Fedora Electronic Lab ticket here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/23 This is my first package ever submitted to Fedora, so I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 21:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152126.n5FLQHJU031415@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 17:26:17 EDT --- perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 21:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 285801] Review Request: simias - Collection-Oriented Data Storage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152129.n5FLTbab011574@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285801 --- Comment #24 from Christopher Brown 2009-06-15 17:29:36 EDT --- (In reply to comment #23) > Created an attachment (id=348006) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348006) [details] > spec file for build 9169 > > Here you go. Thanks! > Also I had to apply libflaim patch for this ticket. Included gSOAP seem to > compile fine. That's cool though we'll need to use system gsoap for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 21:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152147.n5FLlhYD015428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-15 17:47:43 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Panag! Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sub-WrapPackages Short Description: Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 21:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152146.n5FLkAHA003520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-15 17:46:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > When I try to install this package, I saw we need to add > Requires: perl(CGI::Application) > Requires: perl(Test::WWW::Mechanize) > Requires: perl(Test::More) How were you able to see this ? I can remove those modules from my machine and still install the rpm. Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp Short Description: Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 21:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152121.n5FLL7Pg029105@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 17:21:06 EDT --- perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 21:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 17:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506100] Review Request: opennhrp - An NHRP implementation for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152123.n5FLNI5M029982@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506100 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-15 17:23:17 EDT --- Evening, I'm trying to become a packager myself so apologies if I am learning. During the "make" stage there is one error. It is not obvious that it matters but looks worrying? + make fatal: Not a git repository (or any of the parent directories): .git the build is perfectly successful though. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/opennhrp-0.10.3-4.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. good. Hmm, why are there what look to be scripts as below in etc? /etc/opennhrp/opennhrp-script and /etc/opennhrp/racoon-ph1down.sh Now a more fundamental problem: You have "ipsec-tools >= 0.8" but f11 contains: # repoquery --location ipsec-tools ftp://ftp.free.fr/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/fedora/linux/updates/11/x86_64//ipsec-tools-0.7.2-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm i.e it cannot be satisfied without a newer ipsec-tools? Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 22:29:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:29:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] New: Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Summary: Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-p5-Palm/perl-p5-Palm.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-p5-Palm/perl-p5-Palm-1.009-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provide functions and handlers to manipulate files used by Palm PDAs (AddressBook, ToDo, Memo, ...). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 22:29:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:29:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] New: Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Summary: Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.gr33nn1nj4.com/rpms/bespin.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gr33nn1nj4.com/rpms/bespin-0.1r483-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Renamed baghira, a theme that was upstream but is being removed. The author has decided to keep it as a personal hobby. Bespin is inspired by various design ideas found in screenshots. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 22:30:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-TheSchwartz/perl-TheSchwartz.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-TheSchwartz/perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc11.src.rpm Description: TheSchwartz is a reliable job queue system. Your application can put jobs into the system and your worker processes can pull jobs from the queue atomically to perform. Failed jobs can be left in the queue to retry later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 22:38:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:38:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152238.n5FMck1L014898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |job queue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 22:44:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 18:44:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502525] Review Request: lazygal - static photo gallery generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152244.n5FMiDvd016028@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502525 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 23:05:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:05:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152305.n5FN54aU020549@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 19:05:02 EDT --- olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 23:12:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:12:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152312.n5FNCWBr022074@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 manuel wolfshant changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 15 23:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 19:57:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906152357.n5FNvosv009246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |feng.shaun at gmail.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |feng.shaun at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 00:10:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:10:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160010.n5G0Ambl001175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 00:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160020.n5G0KXvm003172@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #1 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-15 20:20:32 EDT --- I have updated it via advice from nucleo in #fedora-kde and the new srpm link is http://www.gr33nn1nj4.com/rpms/bespin-0.1-0.1.20090615svn483.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 00:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160028.n5G0SC03015798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #2 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-15 20:28:11 EDT --- [JKnife at Lappy x86_64]$ rpmlint bespin-common-0.1-0.1.20090615svn483.fc12.x86_64.rpm bespin-debuginfo-0.1-0.1.20090615svn483.fc12.x86_64.rpm bespin-kwin-theme-0.1-0.1.20090615svn483.fc12.x86_64.rpm kde-plasma-xbar-0.1-0.1.20090615svn483.fc12.x86_64.rpm qt4-theme-bespin-0.1-0.1.20090615svn483.fc12.x86_64.rpm 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 00:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] New: Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mediawiki-CategoryTree/45462-1/mediawiki-CategoryTree.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mediawiki-CategoryTree/45462-1/mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The CategoryTree extension provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree. It uses AJAX to load parts of the tree on demand. CategoryTree was originally written by Daniel Kinzler as an external tool. It was later integrated into the MediaWiki software with the help of Tim Starling. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:21:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160121.n5G1LY94026989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:21:32 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:24:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:24:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160124.n5G1Olsw016651@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:24:46 EDT --- R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:21:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:21:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160121.n5G1Lv8C015746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:21:56 EDT --- rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160124.n5G1OTq3016592@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.4.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:22:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160122.n5G1MeOu015987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:22:39 EDT --- websvn-2.2.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:21:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:21:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160121.n5G1LdcW015678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:22:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:22:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160122.n5G1M2Uu015791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160122.n5G1MjXH016029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.2.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:24:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:24:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160124.n5G1OxtR027938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:24:58 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:27:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160127.n5G1Ri33029044@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:27:43 EDT --- toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:24:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:24:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160124.n5G1OOd5027815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:24:23 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160125.n5G1P4Dd028284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.8-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:24:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:24:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160124.n5G1OpvG027879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.1-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160127.n5G1ROR6018015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:27:22 EDT --- jpcap-0.7-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160128.n5G1SaIO018282@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:28:35 EDT --- wannier90-1.1-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:26:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:26:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160126.n5G1QpC6017909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:26:50 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:27:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160127.n5G1RSHZ018049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.7-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:26:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160126.n5G1QuhI017945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.5-1.fc10 |0.4.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:27:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160127.n5G1Rn5t018148@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3-0.4.beta2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160128.n5G1SfqS018319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-4.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:29:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:29:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160129.n5G1TOh9018455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:29:22 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update stxxl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6038 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:27:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:27:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160127.n5G1RdpE018092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:27:38 EDT --- libint-1.1.4-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libint'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6016 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160128.n5G1S2UC029353@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:28:01 EDT --- perl-Daemon-Generic-0.61-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160131.n5G1V8Al030610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.6.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499050] Review Request: perl-Daemon-Generic - Framework to provide start/stop/reload for a daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160128.n5G1S6Cd029477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499050 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.61-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160132.n5G1W8va030824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:32:08 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update stxxl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6055 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:28:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160128.n5G1SHv5029533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:28:16 EDT --- libmemcached-0.30-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmemcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6021 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:31:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:31:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160131.n5G1V4Eh019460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:31:03 EDT --- gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:31:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:31:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160131.n5G1VVjl019671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:31:30 EDT --- perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Alien-SeleniumRC'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:31:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:31:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160131.n5G1VcCG019708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:31:37 EDT --- libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libxdg-basedir'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6047 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:37:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160137.n5G1bkcL000564@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.14-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:37:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160137.n5G1b93i000421@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:37:08 EDT --- perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6088 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:34:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:34:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160134.n5G1YfgM031924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:34:35 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ocaml-ancient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160138.n5G1cWab022498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:38:31 EDT --- pdfchain-0.99-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160139.n5G1dTUs022742@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:39:28 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160138.n5G1cAoQ022324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:38:09 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160137.n5G1bKP7022046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:37:18 EDT --- perl-SystemPerl-1.321-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:38:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:38:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160138.n5G1cEeR022365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8-3.fc11 |0.8-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505965] Review Request: supybot-meetbot - Plugin for Supybot for handling IRC meetings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160138.n5G1cV7T022465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505965 --- Comment #2 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-15 21:38:30 EDT --- Thanks for the quick review! I've talked to the upstream author and he's going to make a number of enhancements in the next few days. I am going to wait for those to land before importing this. Thanks again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:37:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:37:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160137.n5G1bxT4022270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:37:58 EDT --- trac-peerreview-plugin-0.11-1.svn5357.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160137.n5G1bQE7022102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.321-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:37:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160137.n5G1bfrY022186@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Bug 478923 depends on bug 478922, which changed state. Bug 478922 Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-control - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Control Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478922 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:37:40 EDT --- globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:39:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:39:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160139.n5G1dh7N001287@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:39:42 EDT --- towhee-6.2.3-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:41:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:41:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160141.n5G1fBTq002031@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:41:10 EDT --- globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160138.n5G1caqc001035@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.99-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:39:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:39:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160139.n5G1dYKO001247@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.5-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:39:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:39:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160139.n5G1dm2D001324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.2.3-5.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:41:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:41:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160141.n5G1fGqa002073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.7-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:38:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:38:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160138.n5G1c3wj000912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.11-1.svn5357.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:44:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160144.n5G1iA65025150@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6.1-2.fc11 |2.6.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:40:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:40:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160140.n5G1ensC024115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:40:47 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160140.n5G1era1024161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.3.git20090125.fc11 |0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160143.n5G1h4nm024865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:43:03 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update nekobee-dssi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6133 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:42:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:42:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160142.n5G1gDBf024650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:42:12 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tuxmath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6120 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160141.n5G1fR65024363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:41:26 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update xsynth-dssi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6117 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160144.n5G1i654003093@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:44:06 EDT --- gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160146.n5G1kOC7003992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.14-1.fc11 |3.14-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:46:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:46:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160146.n5G1kHxt026352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:46:16 EDT --- globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160147.n5G1ldXl026694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:47:36 EDT --- wordnet-3.0-8.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:48:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:48:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160148.n5G1mgOZ027049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.6.1-2.fc9 |2.6.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:49:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:49:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160149.n5G1n1pT027131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3.52.6-4.fc11 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:47:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160147.n5G1ljgS026744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.0-8.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:47:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:47:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160147.n5G1lWFK026643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:47:31 EDT --- mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-libtiff'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6162 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:52:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:52:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160152.n5G1qXIh006026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.99-3.fc11 |0.99-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503975] Review Request: gimpfx-foundry - Additional GIMP plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160148.n5G1mb1g004630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503975 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:48:36 EDT --- gimpfx-foundry-2.6.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:48:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:48:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160148.n5G1mvBb004719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:48:56 EDT --- libiodbc-3.52.6-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:51:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:51:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160151.n5G1pCCa005680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.05-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:50:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160150.n5G1oOmE005480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:50:23 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xsynth-dssi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6185 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:50:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:50:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160150.n5G1oCQj005331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.8.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:52:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:52:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160152.n5G1qeYD006068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:52:39 EDT --- erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlsyslog'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6206 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:52:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502856] Review Request: pdfchain - A GUI for pdftk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160152.n5G1qSWm028731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502856 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:52:27 EDT --- pdfchain-0.99-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:54:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160154.n5G1sDrV029130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:54:12 EDT --- websvn-2.2.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160150.n5G1o7pH027980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:50:07 EDT --- findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160151.n5G1p6sK028274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:51:05 EDT --- perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160153.n5G1rbvT028978@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:53:32 EDT --- python-application-1.1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-application'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6216 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:51:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:51:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160151.n5G1p9aZ028344@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(eric at christensenp | |lace.us) | --- Comment #77 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-15 21:51:02 EDT --- SPEC:http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/security-guide/fedora-security-guide-en-US.spec SRPM: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/security-guide/fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-14.fc11.src.rpm RPMLINT: [christensene at localhost rpm]$ rpmlint SRPMS/fedora-security-guide-en-US-1.0-14.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [christensene at localhost rpm]$ rpmlint SPECS/fedora-security-guide-en-US.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:54:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:54:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492397] Review Request: websvn - Online subversion repository browser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160154.n5G1sIxL006688@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492397 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.2.1-1.fc11 |2.2.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160156.n5G1ud1B007593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:56:39 EDT --- R-msm-0.9.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160156.n5G1uTk8007517@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.86-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160157.n5G1vSXf007810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.3-4.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160155.n5G1tFLa007273@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:55:13 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nekobee-dssi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6229 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160156.n5G1u5AB007458@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:56:04 EDT --- python-application-1.1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-application'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6239 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:56:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160156.n5G1uqtT007657@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:56:52 EDT --- erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update erlang-erlsyslog'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6244 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160156.n5G1uOGd030142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:56:23 EDT --- peppy-0.9.86-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160158.n5G1wqJA030751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:58:52 EDT --- findbugs-contrib-3.8.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:57:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:57:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160157.n5G1vuGq030534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:57:55 EDT --- wordnet-3.0-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1xEPS030815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7-6.fc10 |0.7-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1xZkQ030875@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.86-1.fc11 |0.9.86-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504489] Review Request: proguard - Java class file shrinker, optimizer, obfuscator and preverifier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160157.n5G1vNLc030345@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504489 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:57:22 EDT --- proguard-4.3-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:56:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:56:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160156.n5G1uiU3030238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.1-1.fc10 |0.9.1-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1xgRE030919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Bug 499975 depends on bug 499306, which changed state. Bug 499306 Summary: Review Request: jconv - Jack Convolution Engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499306 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:59:41 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503519] Review Request: bastet - An evil falling bricks game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160200.n5G20Zkg009244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503519 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:00:34 EDT --- bastet-0.43-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497572] Review Request: peppy - Editor written in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1xUsa008578@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497572 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:59:29 EDT --- peppy-0.9.86-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472683] Review Request: jpcap - Packet capturing library for Java In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1xAeM008519@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472683 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:59:09 EDT --- jpcap-0.7-6.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160200.n5G208kr009020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:00:06 EDT --- b43-tools-0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:02:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160202.n5G22WlA009959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:02:31 EDT --- toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:58:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:58:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491027] Review Request: findbugs-contrib - Extra findbugs detectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160158.n5G1wved008440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491027 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.8.1-2.fc10 |3.8.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473583] Review Request: wordnet - A lexical database for the english language In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160158.n5G1w1fK008209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473583 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.0-8.fc10 |3.0-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1xlcO008649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.04.5-1.fc9 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 01:59:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 21:59:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160159.n5G1x5X9008488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 21:59:04 EDT --- perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Config-Auto'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6259 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:04:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:04:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160204.n5G24DRC032741@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:04:12 EDT --- toot2-3-0.4.beta2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:02:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:02:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160202.n5G22trg032419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:02:53 EDT --- cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:03:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:03:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160203.n5G23m3g032622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:03:47 EDT --- rpmdepsize-1.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160202.n5G22d7u032340@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3-0.4.beta2.fc10 |3-0.4.beta2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492197] Review Request: toot2 - Java models and frameworks for Audio/MIDI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160204.n5G24Hnc000309@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492197 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3-0.4.beta2.fc9 |3-0.4.beta2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:00:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:00:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490638] Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160200.n5G20CbY031664@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.3.git20090125.fc9 |0-0.3.git20090125.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:00:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:00:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474787] Review Request: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160200.n5G20gYc031757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:00:41 EDT --- stxxl-1.2.1-9.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update stxxl'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6266 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:04:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:04:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160204.n5G24oWF010968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:04:49 EDT --- flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:04:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:04:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160204.n5G24sv3011005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.2-0.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:07:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:07:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160207.n5G27OVQ011967@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:07:23 EDT --- globus-ftp-client-3.14-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498748] Review Request: rpmdepsize - A tool for visualizing RPM dependencies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160203.n5G23qRJ010800@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498748 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-3.fc10 |1.0-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478923] Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160207.n5G27S1U012005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.14-1.fc9 |3.14-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:03:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:03:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160203.n5G230Gl010241@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.8.4-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160207.n5G27HPn011922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-5.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:06:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:06:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160206.n5G26RS1011739@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.70-2.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:07:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:07:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160207.n5G27odL012088@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:07:49 EDT --- ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ophcrack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6307 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:06:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:06:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160206.n5G26Mho001462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:06:22 EDT --- perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:08:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160208.n5G28u7J002254@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:07:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:07:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160207.n5G27Cgt001824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:07:11 EDT --- zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:07:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502600] Review Request: ocaml-ancient - OCaml library for large memory structures and sharing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160207.n5G27baq001911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502600 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:07:36 EDT --- ocaml-ancient-0.9.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ocaml-ancient'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6304 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160205.n5G25dBo001194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:05:38 EDT --- mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update mingw32-libtiff'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6289 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160210.n5G2AK8g013461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:10:19 EDT --- libiodbc-3.52.6-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:11:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:11:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160211.n5G2BuAn014102@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:11:55 EDT --- towhee-6.2.3-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160208.n5G28pkD012644@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:08:48 EDT --- python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:10:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:10:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504076] Review Request: libiodbc - iODBC Driver Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160210.n5G2APKq013521@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504076 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.52.6-4.fc11 |3.52.6-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160210.n5G2AjVX013610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-4.fc10 |1.1-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:12:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:12:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498246] Review Request: towhee - A Monte Carlo molecular simulation code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160212.n5G2C1Vo014150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498246 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6.2.3-5.fc10 |6.2.3-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:09:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160209.n5G29692012735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:09:03 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openttd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6308 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:11:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:11:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160211.n5G2Bpgi014039@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:11:49 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update xsynth-dssi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6321 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:14:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:14:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160214.n5G2EMLW004855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 --- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:14:20 EDT --- gpxe-0.9.7-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492181] Review Request: gpxe - A network boot loader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160214.n5G2ETCO004962@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492181 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.7-4.fc10 |0.9.7-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:10:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:10:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496880] Review Request: wannier90 - Maximally-localised Wannier functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160210.n5G2AeCr003532@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496880 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:10:39 EDT --- wannier90-1.1-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:13:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160213.n5G2DpXb015179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:13:50 EDT --- globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160216.n5G2Go8C016539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:16:49 EDT --- olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491518] Review Request: openttd - Transport system simulation game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160212.n5G2Cvv4014566@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491518 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:12:54 EDT --- openttd-0.7.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update openttd'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6329 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160213.n5G2DvV2015234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.7-2.fc10 |4.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:14:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:14:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160214.n5G2EhDR015447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:14:40 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tuxmath'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6342 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:13:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:13:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160213.n5G2Dg8w015113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:13:38 EDT --- ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update ophcrack'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6331 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:16:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:16:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160216.n5G2G6TK016330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:16:05 EDT --- pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pypar'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6350 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160216.n5G2GuIr006492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6-4.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:18:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160218.n5G2ITHo007141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(mhideo at redhat.com | |) --- Comment #78 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-15 22:18:26 EDT --- Thanks, Eric: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1416026 Mike, any idea when we might be able to apply the publican patch to fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:21:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:21:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160221.n5G2LUJM018439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:21:29 EDT --- globus-rls-server-4.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:21:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:21:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478931] Review Request: globus-rls-server - Globus Toolkit - Replica Location Service Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160221.n5G2LZke018476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478931 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.7-2.fc9 |4.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:24:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:24:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160224.n5G2OsWu009685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:24:53 EDT --- easystroke-0.4.5-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160224.n5G2OGkJ009462@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.04.5-1.fc9 |0.04.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:21:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:21:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160221.n5G2LOYL008545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:21:24 EDT --- libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libxdg-basedir'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6372 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160224.n5G2OAQA019513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:24:09 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:27:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:27:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160227.n5G2RbZV020754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:27:36 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160226.n5G2Qo0O020579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:26:49 EDT --- perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160225.n5G2Pigm020264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1-5.fc10 |1.0.1-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:27:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:27:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502621] Review Request: libint - A library that evaluates integrals over Gaussian basis functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160227.n5G2RG2q020661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502621 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:27:16 EDT --- libint-1.1.4-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libint'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6393 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160227.n5G2R3vB011167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:27:02 EDT --- flamerobin-0.9.2-0.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160225.n5G2PSgi010562@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:25:27 EDT --- lxsession-0.3.8-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:27:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:27:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495412] Review Request: flamerobin - Graphical client for Firebird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160227.n5G2R8jN011207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495412 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.2-0.fc10 |0.9.2-0.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:24:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:24:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503031] Review Request: easystroke - Gesture-recognition application for X11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160224.n5G2Ow7q009803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503031 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.4.5-1.fc11 |0.4.5-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:27:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:27:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160227.n5G2RgpA011315@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-1.fc9 |1.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500922] Review Request: zerofree - Utility to force unused ext2 inodes and blocks to zero In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160225.n5G2Pdpj010660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500922 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:25:38 EDT --- zerofree-1.0.1-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:26:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:26:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160226.n5G2Qt7T011118@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.013-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:25:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:25:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502404] Review Request: lxsession - Lightweight X11 session manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160225.n5G2PWa5010602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502404 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.8-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160234.n5G2YVu6014026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.05-1.fc10 |0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502054] Review Request: perl-Lingua-Flags - Provide small flag icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160234.n5G2YRbx013990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502054 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:34:26 EDT --- perl-Lingua-Flags-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160234.n5G2Y5ZM024160@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:34:03 EDT --- PyQwt-5.1.0-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2ZKqp024839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:35:19 EDT --- perl-SystemPerl-1.321-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472229] Review Request: PyQwt - Python bindings for Qwt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160234.n5G2YAFh024202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472229 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|5.1.0-4.fc10 |5.1.0-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2ZXVL024964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:35:32 EDT --- perl-Config-Properties-1.70-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2ZQJW024916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.321-1.fc11 |1.321-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2ZcnP025006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.70-2.fc10 |1.70-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487521] Review Request: pypar - Parallel programming with Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2ZEbq024777@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487521 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:35:13 EDT --- pypar-2.1.0_66-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update pypar'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160237.n5G2b7Gf025296@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:37:05 EDT --- perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Data-ObjectDriver'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6433 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:38:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:38:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160238.n5G2ceMb015883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.5-1.fc11 |1.5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160235.n5G2ZxhR014861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:35:58 EDT --- perl-Carp-Clan-Share-0.013-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502222] Review Request: perl-Carp-Clan-Share - Share your Carp::Clan settings with your whole Clan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160236.n5G2a3mg014898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502222 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.013-1.fc10 |0.013-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:38:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:38:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160238.n5G2cx55016044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:38:58 EDT --- dssi-vst-0.8-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:37:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:37:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160237.n5G2bCSB015301@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:37:11 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update nekobee-dssi'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6434 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:37:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:37:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160237.n5G2bTTK015511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:37:28 EDT --- libmemcached-0.30-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libmemcached'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6437 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:38:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496677] Review Request: nfoview - Viewer for NFO files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160238.n5G2cZr9025884@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496677 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:38:35 EDT --- nfoview-1.5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160242.n5G2g4Op027091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:42:03 EDT --- python-line_profiler-1.0-0.3.b2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:42:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:42:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160242.n5G2gO4b027173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.04.5-1.fc10 |0.04.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:39:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492221] Review Request: dssi-vst - DSSI plugin wrapper for VST plugins In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160239.n5G2d30F025994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492221 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8-2.fc10 |0.8-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499975] Review Request: guitarix - Mono amplifier to JACK In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160242.n5G2gJrP017704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499975 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:42:18 EDT --- guitarix-0.04.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160241.n5G2f4K2017292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:41:03 EDT --- python-sippy-0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446841] Review Request: python-sippy - B2BUA SIP call controlling component In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160241.n5G2fAhU017360@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446841 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc11 |0-0.8.20090429cvs.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160246.n5G2k7Ae028998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:46:05 EDT --- cnetworkmanager-0.8.4-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160244.n5G2if5L028143@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-15 22:44:40 EDT --- perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6484 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 02:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 22:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500437] Review Request: cnetworkmanager - Command-line client for NetworkManager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160246.n5G2kCAW019501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.8.4-2.fc10 |0.8.4-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 03:18:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:18:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492091] Review Request: zikula-module-Content - Page editing module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160318.n5G3Ifk3004343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492091 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |504066(FE-ZIKULA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 03:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160318.n5G3IiWq004446@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |504066(FE-ZIKULA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 03:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505946] Review Request: zikula-module-menutree - Menutree allows to create multilevel, hierarchical (tree-like) menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160318.n5G3IlWo004491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505946 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |504066(FE-ZIKULA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 03:18:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:18:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160318.n5G3ImOm004540@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |504066(FE-ZIKULA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 03:18:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 23:18:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160318.n5G3Io3u004565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eric at christensenplace.us Blocks| |504066(FE-ZIKULA) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 04:11:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:11:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160411.n5G4BZqF005803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #48 from Paul Lange 2009-06-16 00:11:33 EDT --- > > Excellent. Mauricio, please go to the account system and apply for the packager > > group: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ > mmm, kind of lost here, I have a fedora account but I supose to "join a > group"?, is that is the case, what is the mono group name? The group is called 'packager' > > Note that once I've sponsored you, you'll be on step #4 here: > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > don't know what to do with that :-S ...thanks Toshio... Look at this to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 04:13:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:13:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160413.n5G4Dmvl015427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at traylen.net --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-16 00:13:47 EDT --- Hi Andrew, I am not able to sponsor your package but I can hopefully offer some useful help. For me the compile won't pass an rpath check as shown below. rpmbuild -ba libpuzzle-0.11-1.fc11.src.rpm runs a check since I have in my ~/.rpmmacros %__arch_install_post /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot as put there by "rpmdev-setuptree" Steve + /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot ******************************************************************************* * * WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH and will cause 'rpmbuild' * to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the '$QA_RPATHS' * environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the values * below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000. * * 0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor * issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without * providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib * environments. * 0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute * nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk * 0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a * SECURITY risk * 0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other * RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted * 0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs * and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries * 0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break * the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink * * * Examples: * - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like * $ QA_RPATHS=$[ 0x0001|0x0010 ] rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm * - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like * $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT= /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths * ******************************************************************************* ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/puzzle-diff' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.O9FHYw (%install) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 05:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160504.n5G54qYP015943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 01:04:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > When I try to install this package, I saw we need to add > > Requires: perl(CGI::Application) > > Requires: perl(Test::WWW::Mechanize) > > Requires: perl(Test::More) > > How were you able to see this ? > I can remove those modules from my machine and still install the rpm. > I mean to say yum should resolve these dependencies automatically which is not happening. From Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05/META.yml, you can see what this package requires. So those should be installed automatically provided you have not them installed already. Perl packages most of the time finds and installs Requires for them automatically but if that is not happening then we need to add them in SPEC file. Use yum to install binary rpm not just rpm command as it depends on what is written in SPEC file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 05:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160506.n5G56Uf6025559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 05:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160506.n5G56hgI016656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 05:06:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:06:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160506.n5G56HjE016574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 05:19:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:19:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160519.n5G5Jw2B027951@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #11 from Bryson Lee 2009-06-16 01:19:57 EDT --- Sorry for the hiatus...(In reply to comment #6). > > - Doesn't the version macro at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#arch-specific_packages > work? Where does it fail? > > - Have you tried the configure argument --libdir=%{tcl_sitearch} to change the > default install location? > Still need to investigate these two items. > - Do you really need to specify --with-tcl=%{_libdir}? OK, on multiarch arches > with both 32- and 64-bit versions installed you might get into trouble if > configure picks up the wrong version. No hurt having this if you think it's > necessary. > I had exactly this issue when building originally on an x86_64 machine > - License tag should be MIT (see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing ). But > this is really not necessary, since CMU is compatible with GPL and License: > GPLv3+ is enough. > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - See comment above, license tag should be just GPLv3+. > It appears that the author has licensed his TCL-specific wrapper code under GPLv3+; however, the NetSNMP source files that are also included in the package explicitly call out the CMU license. Hence my original choice of "CMU and GPLv3+". I have no particular axe to grind about this, so if just GPLv3+ is sufficient I'll update the specfile accordingly. > MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. OK > UST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK > MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A > > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX > - Even though the files that are installed are generated, it's always nice to > preserve time stamps in install phase. Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to > make install. > Will do. > MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A > > MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package > that owns the directory. ~OK > - Instead of > %dir %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version} > %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/*.so > %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/pkgIndex.tcl > just put > %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/ > as this will own the directory and everything in it. > Right...wondered about that. A couple of other Fedora TCL extension packages I looked at did it as in the current iteration of the specfile, so I went with that approach. Will adjust to use %dir instead. > MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK > MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK > MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK > MUST: Clean section exists. OK > MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A > > MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect > runtime of application. NEEDSFIX > - Add AUTHORS. BUGS and TODO should otherwise be included, but now they just > contain instructions to grep the code. > Will do. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 05:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 01:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160547.n5G5lhRM000956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #40 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-16 01:47:41 EDT --- Here is the latest spec file. SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec If there are errors in %description, Could you teach me how to write it in right way? I seems not to know how I should write it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 06:02:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:02:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160602.n5G623iY003698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 02:02:02 EDT --- Can I get SRPM URL? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 06:27:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 02:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160627.n5G6R0xf031976@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #9 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-16 02:26:58 EDT --- Jan Klepek, SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.70.2-2.ppa4.fc10.src.rpm SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter.spec I upload the latest package for shutter. But I do not test it on koji server. I test it in my local rpmlint. There is no warning and no error. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 07:41:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:41:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160741.n5G7fTCH023888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-16 03:41:28 EDT --- Sorry, should have uploaded http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ko-0.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm not the noarch.rpm of course -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 07:48:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:48:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160748.n5G7mpEV017308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-16 03:48:51 EDT --- Hi Steve, Thanks for taking time to review my rpm, its very weird that happens when you build, i have tested using koji as well as locally and could not reproduce your error. I have how ever added a fix to the spec, please test again and see if it builds. Thanks again. Andrew -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 07:52:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:52:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160752.n5G7qun0018325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chitlesh at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chitlesh at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 07:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 03:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489633] Review Request: mingw32-physfs - MinGW Windows port of the PhysicsFS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160757.n5G7va8S019484@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489633 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #24 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-16 03:57:34 EDT --- It seems that we should close this ticket (mingw32-physfs was built and pushed to updates). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 08:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160820.n5G8Kg6S001220@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-16 04:20:41 EDT --- Hi, It builds now. There some rpmlint errors that need fixing. $ rpmlint libpuzzle-0.11-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm libpuzzle.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man3 libpuzzle.x86_64: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/share/man/man8 libpuzzle.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libpuzzle-0.11/ChangeLog libpuzzle.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/libpuzzle-0.11/NEWS see $ rpmlint -I standard-dir-owned-by-package to get details on the individual messages. In particular for the first one see the first paragraph of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_and_Directory_Ownership There are few trivial ones as well in the php package. $ rpmlint php-libpuzzle-0.11-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm php-libpuzzle.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/php-libpuzzle-0.11/EXPERIMENTAL php-libpuzzle.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/php-libpuzzle-0.11/similar.php php-libpuzzle.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/php.d/libpuzzle.ini Also I don't think you need or shoudl have the Requires: gd since this is picked up automatically anyway. Check for php bits as well but am less sure. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Explicit_Requires -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 08:37:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:37:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506231] New: Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506231 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-smj.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-smj-1.0-0.1.beta7.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 08:46:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:46:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506231] Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160846.n5G8kYgM006842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506231 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:01:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:01:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160901.n5G91bPX001759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-16 05:01:36 EDT --- Hi Steve, Fixed the issues raised, the rpmlint now comes out clean on my side. If you can give it a run again. I would appreciate it if you can critic my other submission https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:01:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:01:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506232] New: Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506232 Summary: Review Request: rekonq - KDE browser based on Webkit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fedora at berkenpies.nl QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/rekonq.spec SRPM URL: http://kaboon.fedorapeople.org/rekonq/0.1.0/F11/rekonq-0.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: rekonq is a KDE browser based on Webkit. Its code is based on Nokia QtDemoBrowser, just like Arora. It's implementation is going to embrace KDE technologies to have a full-featured KDE web browser. Rekonq currently provides: * A good tabbed browsing experience * Download files through KDE download system * Share bookmarks with Konqueror * Navigate in a proxied net * Browse anonymously * Inspect web pages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:14:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:14:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506231] Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160914.n5G9EASH004585@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506231 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 05:14:08 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1417476 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 31029eb7f716e5430f404503e23903fa9591c6d3 hunspell-smj.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:13:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:13:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160913.n5G9DJL3012588@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #10 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-16 05:13:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1] > what is meaning of share/shutter/resources/system/plugins directory in your > tarball? > in bash plugins you are using convert from imagemagick, without imagemagick in > requirements this plugins wouldn't work. > Are this plugins (both, perl and bash) needed for work of shutter? or they just > to extend functionality? this questions is still here. In other words, could shutter perform basic functionality without plugins? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:15:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:15:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160915.n5G9FeJn013318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 05:15:38 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1417484 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 18110707c6dc948db19b3078629e52fbc8d69969 ko-aff-dic-0.2.4.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:17:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:17:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480855] Review Request: bournal - Write personal, password-protected journal entries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160917.n5G9HB5t005560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480855 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(fabian at bernewirel | |ess.net) | --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-16 05:17:08 EDT --- This package depends on ccrypt. But the implemented tests of this package fails on i386 and upstream is no answering. At the moment I see no solution to bring bournel in Fedora with ccrypt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:18:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:18:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495577] Review Request: xsw - A simple slideshow producer and viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160918.n5G9IFLQ013789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495577 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-16 05:18:14 EDT --- I will try to spend some time on this package during FUDCon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:35:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:35:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160935.n5G9ZhFS017787@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-16 05:35:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > I mean to say yum should resolve these dependencies automatically which is not > happening. From Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05/META.yml, you can see what this > package requires. So those should be installed automatically provided you have > not them installed already. I've pinged upstream about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:41:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:41:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160941.n5G9f1qr018885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] New: Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-geoip/php-pecl-geoip.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-geoip/php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This PHP extension allows you to find the location of an IP address City, State, Country, Longitude, Latitude, and other information as all, such as ISP and connection type. It makes use of Maxminds geoip database I am requesting sponsorship for this rpm please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:40:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:40:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160940.n5G9eRiq010769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #67 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-16 05:40:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #66) > And they are not, as you could have seen in #64. The only packages required by > -devel are boost-devel and atlas-devel, which both contain headers that are > used by the armadillo headers. Sorry, it was my mistake: I read blas-devel instead of atlas-devel! So, that is fine for me with boost-devel and atlas-devel. Moreover, as stated in comment #59 by Michael, "libstdc++-devel is assumed to be available, too, and need not be specified as a Requires/BuildRequires in any package". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 09:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 05:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906160951.n5G9pL3R021078@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #1 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-16 05:51:20 EDT --- Just some quick comments on your spec file - You can remove '--vendor=""' - '%defattr(-, root, root)' should be '%defattr(-,root,root,-)' - Please add '%{?_smp_mflags}' to make -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:06:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:06:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506231] Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161006.n5GA60Jm024073@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506231 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-16 06:05:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-smj Short Description: Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161008.n5GA8pbc016737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161005.n5GA5IWY016180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-16 06:05:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ko Short Description: Korean hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:15:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:15:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479515] Review Request: Music Organizer - Music Organizer , organize your mp3, ogg, flac and mp4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161015.n5GAF6m0026215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479515 --- Comment #5 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-16 06:15:04 EDT --- and? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161017.n5GAHtJg018716@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #5 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-16 06:17:54 EDT --- $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/php-libpuzzle-0.11-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm php-libpuzzle.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/php-libpuzzle-0.11/similar.php 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. still present. Agreed the libpuzzle-* ones pass just fine. Reading the INSTALL file since there is "make check" is sensible or possible to call this after the build? Maybe the .ini file should be created in the %build stage before being installed in the %install stage. Genrally manipulations of the BUILD area should be in build. i.e %{__rm} -rf php %{__mv} php-plain php should move up to %build if possible? Will look at the php bit later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:45:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:45:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161045.n5GAjSD7032532@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 06:45:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1417345 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url bb5307ff9340add0a78bf4e690adfdeef4707a92 p5-Palm-1.009.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave nothing. + Package perl-p5-Palm-1.009-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Palm) = 1.1 perl(Palm::Address) = 1.19 perl(Palm::DateTime) = 1.4 perl(Palm::Datebook) = 1.20 perl(Palm::Mail) = 1.17 perl(Palm::Memo) = 1.13 perl(Palm::PDB) = 1.36 perl(Palm::Raw) = 1.11 perl(Palm::StdAppInfo) = 1.20 perl(Palm::ToDo) = 1.12 perl(Palm::ZirePhoto) = 1.9 Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Exporter) perl(POSIX) perl(Palm::Address) perl(Palm::Datebook) perl(Palm::Mail) perl(Palm::Memo) perl(Palm::PDB) perl(Palm::Raw) perl(Palm::StdAppInfo) perl(Palm::ToDo) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Should: 1) Consider adding examples directory to %doc Here perl(Test::More) as requires is not needed as its only used by tests directory and we are not installing them. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 10:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 06:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161058.n5GAwbZ4002507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 06:58:36 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1417347 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 56df454fa7041220fee2c90f251605ce8dc27357 TheSchwartz-1.07.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=23, Tests=421, 4 wallclock secs ( 0.21 usr 0.07 sys + 3.02 cusr 0.43 csys = 3.73 CPU) + Package perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(TheSchwartz) = 1.07 perl(TheSchwartz::Error) perl(TheSchwartz::ExitStatus) perl(TheSchwartz::FuncMap) perl(TheSchwartz::Job) perl(TheSchwartz::JobHandle) perl(TheSchwartz::Worker) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(Carp) perl(DBI) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Driver::DBI) perl(Data::ObjectDriver::Errors) perl(Digest::MD5) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(List::Util) perl(Storable) perl(TheSchwartz::Error) perl(TheSchwartz::ExitStatus) perl(TheSchwartz::FuncMap) perl(TheSchwartz::Job) perl(TheSchwartz::JobHandle) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(fields) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 11:16:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 07:16:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161116.n5GBGSv3006404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-16 07:16:27 EDT --- I have made the changes rpmlint is now clean on all the 3 rpm's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161233.n5GCXO89016062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-16 08:33:23 EDT --- The srpm don't compile. Missing BuildRequires javacc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161232.n5GCWdir015951@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |akurtako at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161242.n5GCgUBV017919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #13 from Thomas Sailer 2009-06-16 08:42:29 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mingw32-boost Short Description: MinGW Windows Boost C++ library Owners: sailer epienbro rjones Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:43:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:43:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161243.n5GChDVs018078@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Sailer 2009-06-16 08:43:11 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: vfrnav Short Description: Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Owners: sailer Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:43:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:43:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161243.n5GChTiY026192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 12:43:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 08:43:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161243.n5GChaI9026234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Thomas Sailer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 13:26:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:26:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161326.n5GDQ6UN029546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Vadim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vperetokin at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Vadim 2009-06-16 09:26:05 EDT --- Of capturing a screenshot, yes. goocanvas is also optional along with image manipulation plugins, but it would severely impact the basic features of the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 13:29:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:29:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161329.n5GDTHbl029909@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-16 09:29:16 EDT --- Thanks, Parag! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-TheSchwartz Short Description: Reliable job queue Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 14:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161452.n5GEqm6h029454@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #3 from Armin 2009-06-16 10:52:47 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [--] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [--] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [--] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 14:55:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161455.n5GEt20T020852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #4 from Armin 2009-06-16 10:55:01 EDT --- Three things: 1) The specfile doesn't handle locales properly using %find_lang 2) ldconfig is not run in %pre and %post even though you installed shared library files (.so) 3) the description and summary sections does not contain translations ignore the 3rd one, it's not that important I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 15:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161531.n5GFV10h030499@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #5 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-16 11:31:00 EDT --- As for #1 they don't have translations upstream. and I just fixed #2 (new spec is uploaded) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 15:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161540.n5GFeAaT010653@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-16 11:40:09 EDT --- R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc10,R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc10,R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc10,R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc10,R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc10,R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc10,R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc10,R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc10,R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc10,R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc10,R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 15:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 11:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161541.n5GFfIrH000757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-16 11:41:17 EDT --- R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc11,R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc11,R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc11,R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc11,R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc11,R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc11,R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc11,R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc11,R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc11,R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc11,R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:04:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:04:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161604.n5GG406P017248@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #6 from Armin 2009-06-16 12:03:59 EDT --- Then you're good to go, but add %postun (for ldconfig) too, and you're done :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161614.n5GGERJQ008744@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Armin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Armin 2009-06-16 12:14:26 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161615.n5GGFauD009353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:42:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:42:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161642.n5GGgHYd026318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-16 12:42:16 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:45:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:45:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161645.n5GGjJiZ027134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-16 12:45:18 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:44:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:44:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161644.n5GGiY9Y026660@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-16 12:44:32 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161645.n5GGjKZ4027169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 498845, which changed state. Bug 498845 Summary: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Bug 505154 depends on bug 494845, which changed state. Bug 494845 Summary: Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:53:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:53:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161653.n5GGrlA8017904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #12 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-16 12:53:45 EDT --- Now upstream seems to have 1.8 formal release. Would you check that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:51:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:51:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161651.n5GGpUJU017602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #41 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-16 12:51:28 EDT --- Okay! -------------------------------------------------------- This package (perl-Goo-Canvas) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 16:57:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:57:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161657.n5GGvpE8018783@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #16 from Levente Farkas 2009-06-16 12:57:49 EDT --- now i take my time to read your comments and the reason for many of them that the spec file are made from the native packages. imho it's a good practice to keep the mingw packages close to the native in this case when new native version comes it's much easier to compare and patch. if i remove all those comments then it'd be much harder. should i really do that? other comments are on the way to fix. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 17:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161708.n5GH8lGX021005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-16 13:08:46 EDT --- Well, GPLv2+ and LPPL are incompatible and as far as I see the source code this package is still legally problematic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 17:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161713.n5GHDCOE022198@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #17 from Levente Farkas 2009-06-16 13:13:11 EDT --- the other reason for these much comment because as we discussed earlier and as i wrote in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues#devel_package_split if we start to create static sub-packages then we've to rethink the packaging to create devel subpackages similar to the native case. mainly in this case as there're binaries in the main packages not just dlls. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 17:21:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 13:21:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906161721.n5GHLrYA002659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #7 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-16 13:21:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Well, GPLv2+ and LPPL are incompatible All of the source code is GPLv2+. The only file which is LPPL is the LaTeX stylefile, which is used in exports to EPS or LaTeX format (jaxodraw's output goes into a temp file which includes the stylefile and is compiled into eps). > and as far as I > see the source code this package is still legally problematic. Howcome? It's purely GPLv2+. Quote from upstream reply: On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 09:59 +0200, Lukas Theussl wrote: Hi again, > > After some discussions with John and Jos I just want to sum up our conclusions for > reference: > > * The FORM license does not apply to any part of our work and any reference to it > will be removed > > * JaxoDraw is distributed under GPL > > * axodraw4j (and future axodraw2) are distributed under LPPL > > > Cheers, > -Lukas > -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 18:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] New: Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Summary: Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jnovy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/xz.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/xz-4.999.8beta-0.1.fc11.src.rpm Description: XZ Utils are an attempt to make LZMA compression easy to use on free (as in freedom) operating systems. This is achieved by providing tools and libraries which are similar to use than the equivalents of the most popular existing compression algorithms. LZMA is a general purporse compression algorithm designed by Igor Pavlov as part of 7-Zip. It provides high compression ratio while keeping the decompression speed fast. koji scratch F12 build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1418681 Review of XZ Utils is a part of: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XZRpmPayloads -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 20:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162001.n5GK1N2W028217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Milos Jakubicek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jgranado at redhat.com, | |ville.skytta at iki.fi, | |xjakub at fi.muni.cz AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |xjakub at fi.muni.cz Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-06-16 16:01:21 EDT --- We have to decide how this package will work together with the current lzma. There was already a brief discussion regarding this issue with Ville Skytt? and Joel Granados (cc'ed, input welcome). I'm pasting an e-mail summary: " On Wednesday 10 June 2009, Joel Granados wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 09, 2009 at 07:37:10PM +0300, Ville Skytt? wrote: >> > > On Tuesday 09 June 2009, Joel Granados wrote: >>> > > > Hello Ville. >> > > >> > > Hello Joel, >> > > >>> > > > I'm Joel and I maintain parted for fedora. parted upstream started >>> > > > using XZ for its build tests and it is needed in fedora, at least for >>> > > > parted. I asked in #fedora-devel about XZ in fedora and I was told >>> > > > that you were looking into packaging it. >>> > > > Do you have a spec file proposal? How far along are you in the >>> > > > packaging process? Is there something I can help you with? Why have >>> > > > you not posted the package on the review queue?.... I think, in >>> > > > general, I want to know the status on the packaging effort. >> > > >> > > I did put together an initial package of xz, unfortunately without >> > > realizing > > > > Great!!!, saves me the trouble of doing one myself :) > > >> > > that it conflicts quite a bit with the current Fedora lzma package. >> > > Below is > > > > really? Thats not good.... I spoke to the lzma upstream and he told me > > that it was possible to have the to coexist in a system. Reading your > > mail interchange I see that it _is_ a possibility. I would think this > > to be the prefered solution so we don't break whatever is using the > > original lzma command. I agree that it seems possible. It will require some changes to the lzma package though. >> > > a copy of a quick mail exchange with the new Fedora lzma maintainer Milos >> > > Jakubicek (Cc'd) we had in the beginning of May, I haven't heard back nor >> > > have done anything myself neither to xz or lzma since. > > > > I would be interested in getting this in to fedora (having the two > > coexist) I'm guessing that the only thing needed is to change the > > xz.spec file in such a way that, when installed, it does not conflict > > with LZMA. You mind if I use your spec file as a starting point for > > this? I would think, with my current workload, that I would make it > > ready for f12 or f13(the latest). Do you have any plans regarding this > > package? Not really, and by all means, please use my specfile if you find it useful, that's why I uploaded it in the first place ;) Here's a breakdown of the conflicts and other compatibility issues between lzma and xz: Conflicts: * /usr/bin/lzcat * /usr/bin/lzma * /usr/bin/lzmadec * /usr/bin/unlzma * /usr/share/man/man1/lzdiff.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/lzgrep.1.gz * /usr/share/man/man1/lzmore.1.gz Included in lzma, not in xz: * /usr/bin/lzmainfo Included in lzma-libs, not in xz-libs: * liblzmadec.so.* Included in lzma-devel, not in xz-devel: * lzmadec.h * liblzmadec.so Personally, I would approach this stuff from the POV that eventually xz will obsolete lzma altogether. I think this could be a good way to go (just thinking aloud, not actually tested): Ship the xz package as is from my specfile, and modify the current Fedora lzma package so that everything else except lzmainfo and its man page is removed from the main lzma package, and add "Requires: xz" to the main package (leave lzma-libs and lzma-devel as is). If you are in contact with upstream xz devs, I think it would be good to ask why lzmainfo is not included with xz. If it was, the transition would be simpler; the xz main package could just obsolete the lzma main package, and the lzma source package could be modified so that the main package would be dropped, and only the -libs and -devel subpackages would be shipped. " I'll be able to look at this in more detail at weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 20:31:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:31:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] New: Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 Summary: Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at traylen.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/munge-rpms/munge.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/straylen/munge-rpms/munge-0.5.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: MUNGE (MUNGE Uid 'N' Gid Emporium) is an authentication service for creating and validating credentials. It is designed to be highly scalable for use in an HPC cluster environment. It allows a process to authenticate the UID and GID of another local or remote process within a group of hosts having common users and groups. These hosts form a security realm that is defined by a shared cryptographic key. Clients within this security realm can create and validate credentials without the use of root privileges, reserved ports, or platform-specific methods. There is koji build of munge here. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1418953 The remaining rpmlint errors I believe are all justified. Many of the directories are to be exclusivly read by the munge user. $ rpmlint munge-* munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/munge munge munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/munge munge munge.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/munge 0711 munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/munge munge munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/munge munge munge.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/log/munge 0700 munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/munge munge munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/munge munge munge.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /etc/munge 0700 munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/run/munge munge munge.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/run/munge munge munge.x86_64: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/munge $RH_SUBSYS_BASE munge-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation I require a package sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 20:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499539] Review Request: saxpath - Simple API for xpath In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162045.n5GKjuwa017109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499539 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Overholt 2009-06-16 16:45:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > overholt, below is the new SPEC/SRPM/POM URLs, have fixed the warnings of > "wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding" and "mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs", please > review again, thanks. You still have a trailing tab character on line 6. Thanks for fixing the other warning. Full review below. Lines beginning with X need to be fixed. - naming fine - version and release fine - licensing fine - built from source X ChangeLog entries should be added for your changes - tags are fine X rpmlint warning about mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs - no native code to shared libraries, rpath, etc. waived - not a GUI app - macros used appropriately - no locale data so nothing to worry about here - package contains code - %files okay - maven stuff okay Other than the minor rpmlint warning and the need to add some %changelog entries, this package is ready to go. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 21:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162116.n5GLGCWm024320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-16 17:16:09 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ghc-utf8-string Short Description: Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings Owners: zoglesby Branches: F-11 InitialCC: haskell-sig petersen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 21:49:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:49:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] New: Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Summary: Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: oget.fedora at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/bouncycastle-tsp.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/bouncycastle-tsp-1.43-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bouncy Castle consists of a lightweight cryptography API and is a provider for the Java Cryptography Extension and the Java Cryptography Architecture. This library package offers additional classes, in particuar generators/processors for Time Stamp Protocol (TSP), for Bouncy Castle. This SPEC file is almost a carbon copy of bouncycastle-mail's SPEC file which is already in Fedora and this package is needed for updating itext to 2.1.6 rpmlint: bouncycastle-tsp.src:115: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package) %{_libdir}/gcj/%{name} This can be ignored because, for the time being, we are not building the AOT bits for bouncycastle packages, and hence they are noarch, including this one. koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1419904 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 21:56:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:56:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504405] Review Request: jaxodraw - A Java program for drawing Feynman diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162156.n5GLulh0032746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504405 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-16 17:56:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > (In reply to comment #6) > > Well, GPLv2+ and LPPL are incompatible > > All of the source code is GPLv2+. > > The only file which is LPPL is the LaTeX stylefile, which is used in exports to > EPS or LaTeX format (jaxodraw's output goes into a temp file which includes the > stylefile and is compiled into eps). Also, if it is deemed necessary, I can branch the stylefile in a separate subpackage. One doesn't need to install it to use jaxodraw, then one just can't export to EPS as the LaTeX compilation will fail due to the missing file. (One gets an error message about this.) It might even go in as a separate spec file, however as it's only supposed to be used by jaxodraw I deemed it logical to be in the same spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 22:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162201.n5GM1xNc022818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #2 from Ville Skytt? 2009-06-16 18:01:58 EDT --- For the record and FWIW, the "my specfile" referred to in comment 1's mail summary is http://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/xz.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 22:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162207.n5GM7lkm002537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-16 18:07:46 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Should: > 1) Consider adding examples directory to %doc I've added the following lines to the %install section of my spec: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} cp -r %{_builddir}/p5-Palm-%{version}/examples $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ > APPROVED. Thanks. Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-p5-Palm Short Description: Palm OS utility functions Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 22:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162249.n5GMnIlW000639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 --- Comment #2 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-16 18:49:17 EDT --- New version http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-urllib2_kerberos.spec http://mcepl.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6-2.fc11.src.rpm and built in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1419943 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 22:47:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 18:47:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494171] Review Request: hostapd - WLAN Accesspoint daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162247.n5GMlHae000451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494171 Michael changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclroy at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Michael 2009-06-16 18:47:15 EDT --- I wonder there is still no rpm for the hostapd in Fedora despite I see talks and I even see "Nobody's working on this" above. So I had to build it on my own, well, with the help of all the people out there. I'm happy now playing with it around. Well, a long story short. Here is my short story: http://sites.google.com/site/mclroy/hostapd and my rpm stuff: http://sites.google.com/site/mclroy/hostapd/file/hostapd.spec http://sites.google.com/site/mclroy/hostapd/file/hostapd-0.6.9-1.fc10.src.rpm It works well with driver=wired and ieee8021x=1 for EAP-TLS authentication with freeradius. I think it is enough for inclusion into Fedora for educational purposes at least. ==> /var/log/messages <== Jun 12 23:35:59 ex hostapd: eth0: STA 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed IEEE 802.11: disassociated due to inactivity Jun 12 23:36:00 ex hostapd: eth0: STA 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed IEEE 802.11: deauthenticated due to inactivity Jun 12 23:37:10 ex hostapd: eth0: STA 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed RADIUS: starting accounting session 4A32A8A8-0000000A Jun 12 23:37:10 ex hostapd: eth0: STA 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed IEEE 802.1X: authenticated - EAP type: 13 (TLS) ==> /var/log/radius/radius.log <== Fri Jun 12 23:37:10 2009 : Auth: Login OK: [1D] (from client localhost port 0 cli 00-16-D3-EF-E1-ED) Some tcpdump: 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 60: EAP code=1 id=1 length=0 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 23: EAP code=2 id=0 length=5 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 60: EAP code=1 id=0 length=7 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 24: EAP code=2 id=0 length=6 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 131: EAP code=1 id=0 length=113 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 1042: EAP code=2 id=0 length=1024 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 60: EAP code=1 id=0 length=6 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 1042: EAP code=2 id=0 length=1024 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 60: EAP code=1 id=0 length=6 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 326: EAP code=2 id=0 length=308 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 1510: EAP code=1 id=0 length=1492 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 24: EAP code=2 id=0 length=6 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 86: EAP code=1 id=0 length=68 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 87: EAP code=2 id=0 length=69 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed > 01:80:c2:00:00:03, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 60: EAP code=1 id=0 length=6 00:1d:72:37:8b:c4 > 00:16:d3:ef:e1:ed, ethertype EAPOL (0x888e), length 22: EAP code=2 id=0 length=4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 16 23:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 19:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906162334.n5GNYCX2020696@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Antti Andreimann changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Antti Andreimann 2009-06-16 19:34:10 EDT --- I received the following reply from Boris Kolpackov ====================================================== Thanks for your effort in packaging XSD for Fedora, it is very much appreciated. Regarding the licensing issue, unfortunately relicensing the code under "GPLv2 or later" is not an option at the moment and making it "GPLv2 with exceptions" opens up a potential maintenance problem. Let me explain: the files that are under GPLv2 are from the base libraries that provide functionality that is not related to (nor is aware of) Xerces-C++. In other words, code from, say libcult, is used to parse command line arguments and just happens to be in the same executable (xsdcxx) as code that uses Xerces-C++. Since this GPLv2 code is not interacting in any way with the Xerces-C++ code under ASL 2.0, my understanding of the licenses suggests that there is no issue in having these two pieces of code in the same executable. The problem with making this code "GPLv2 with exceptions for ASL 2.0" is that tomorrow somebody else may start using libcult in their program that uses another, incompatible with GPL, library. They could then rightfully expect that we will add another exception to the licensing condition. I think you see how this can quickly get out of control. Let me know if the above reasoning (the fact that the GPLv2 and ASL code are completely independent) is acceptable to the reviewers. If not then we will have to figure out another way. ====================================================== Well, his logic seems to be that since the libcult does not use xerces functionality, the licencse incompatibility between the two is not an issue. I'm not much of an expert on such border line licensing issues, but the logic here does seem to be similar to making a distribution: you can put different parts of the system in the same bag and distribute them together (as long as such distribution is permitted) even if the individual licenses conflict with each other. The xsd compiler binary is present in debian which has very strict licensing policies, but I don't know if debian maintainers have investigated the libcult vs xerces licensing issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 00:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170008.n5H08hH7027264@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #11 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-06-16 20:08:42 EDT --- SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib.spec SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-5.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 02:57:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:57:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170257.n5H2vLZ5030663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #14 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-16 22:57:20 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > rpmlint output: > healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_sph_transform_lib.so 0775 > healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_pixel_lib.so 0775 > healpy.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm > /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/healpy/_healpy_fitsio_lib.so 0775 > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings. > > - Fix the permissions, they should be 755. > This is so weird. On my system they are 755 so rpmlint isn't complaining. However, I have forced them to by 755 so Done. > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > NEEDSWORK > - This is a python module, so the correct name is python-healpy. Sorry, I didn't know this is a hard rule since the python modules it depends on, numpy, scipy and pyfits don't follow it. However fixed: Done. > SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from > upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK > - License file is still missing. It turns out the COPYING file is in the directory containinh Healpix-c++ which I was deleting. It is now copied to %%doc. Done The new files are again at: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/python-healpy-0.9.6.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 03:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:02:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170302.n5H328LP019286@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #15 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-16 23:02:08 EDT --- Sorry, here is the spec file: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/python-healpy.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 03:15:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502358] Review Request: mojomojo - Catalyst & DBIx::Class powered Wiki In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170315.n5H3Fsim021860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502358 --- Comment #7 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-16 23:15:52 EDT --- Thanks for the feedback. I'll add the necessary requires for perl(JSON), but I think the real problem lies upstream (Catalyst::View::JSON defaults to requiring JSON rather than let JSON::Any pick an implementation automatically - will see if upstream are okay to change that behaviour). And I'll explicitly add the index and upload directories to %files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 03:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170315.n5H3FXKb021794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-16 23:15:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > Should: > > 1) Consider adding examples directory to %doc > > I've added the following lines to the %install section of my spec: > > mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version} > cp -r %{_builddir}/p5-Palm-%{version}/examples > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}/ why to add above lines? I just used following line in spec %doc Changes FAQ LICENSE README TODO examples This worked for me. What errors do you get if you will not add above lines? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 04:36:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:36:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170436.n5H4aK3k016294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-17 00:36:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > I just used following line in spec > %doc Changes FAQ LICENSE README TODO examples ah. I always assumed that you could only have files in the %doc stanza, not directories. This sounds much easier. Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 04:48:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:48:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170448.n5H4mi2Q006598@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 --- Comment #5 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-17 00:48:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > I've pinged upstream about this. Upstream reports that CGI::Application Test::WWW::Mechanize are required. The dependency is more of a left-over from Test::WWW::Mechanize than anything else but since there's only so much testing you can do in Perl without requiring it, I'm adding all three as hard requirements. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 05:02:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:02:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170502.n5H52uUK009392@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #12 from Bryson Lee 2009-06-17 01:02:55 EDT --- Posted updated spec and SRPM: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools.spec http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools-1.0-4.fc10.src.rpm Addressed the following items: > - Doesn't the version macro at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Tcl#arch-specific_packages > work? Where does it fail? > It works when I build locally. There was a comment in the original specfile I used as a template to the effect that determining the TCL version programmatically failed on the Fedora build system because tclsh was not installed by default. I've removed the comment and updated to the documented version macro on the assumption that it's working now. > - Have you tried the configure argument --libdir=%{tcl_sitearch} to change the > default install location? > > - Do you really need to specify --with-tcl=%{_libdir}? OK, on multiarch arches > with both 32- and 64-bit versions installed you might get into trouble if > configure picks up the wrong version. No hurt having this if you think it's > necessary. > --libdir=%{tcl_sitearch} appears to work, including on my multiarch machine. > this is really not necessary, since CMU is compatible with GPL and License: > GPLv3+ is enough. > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSFIX > - See comment above, license tag should be just GPLv3+. License tag updated to GPLv3+ only. > > MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. NEEDSFIX > - Even though the files that are installed are generated, it's always nice to > preserve time stamps in install phase. Use INSTALL="install -p" as argument to > make install. > Added INSTALL="install -p" as suggested. > just put > %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/ > as this will own the directory and everything in it. > Done. > - Add AUTHORS. BUGS and TODO should otherwise be included, but now they just > contain instructions to grep the code. Done. Thanks, Bryson -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 05:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170534.n5H5YGjB026810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-17 01:34:15 EDT --- acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 05:35:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:35:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170535.n5H5ZwOC027420@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 05:35:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:35:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170535.n5H5ZxtA027452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Bug 505507 depends on bug 505508, which changed state. Bug 505508 Summary: Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 05:35:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 01:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170535.n5H5Z016015188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-17 01:35:00 EDT --- acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/acheck-rules-0.3.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 06:47:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:47:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170647.n5H6lAHR028912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #3 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-17 02:47:09 EDT --- Milos, thanks for taking the review and posting here the mailing WRT the XZ utils packaging. I see I was not the first one to package XZ :) The lzma and xz does conflict so better to IMO obsolete the old lzma by xz. I added the obsoletion and provides to the spec. XZ supports old lzma format as well az XZ so there should be no compatibility issues. Ville, thanks for your spec. It helped me to add the pkgconfig dependency to xz-devel. Another thing is version which is wierd -> 4.999.8beta. Should we move the beta to release as Ville did? This seems to be the last release before the XZ-5 so is that worth the trouble? I'll ask upstream about the lzmainfo. BTW. spec and SRPM is now updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:12:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:12:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506355] Review Request: munge - Uid 'N' Gid Emporium In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170912.n5H9CX4s008161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506355 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] New: Review Request: lightsquid - report parser and visualyzer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: lightsquid - report parser and visualyzer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Summary: Review Request: lightsquid - report parser and visualyzer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: aleksey at oscada.org.ua QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid.spec SRPM URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid-1.7.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Report parser and visualyzer, generate sort of report light fast no database required no additional perl modules small disk usage template html. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:28:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:28:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170928.n5H9S8SV011671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-17 05:28:07 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-veditor.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:31:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:31:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - report parser and visualyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170931.n5H9VAfb032524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 --- Comment #1 from Aleksey Popkov 2009-06-17 05:31:09 EDT --- Spec URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid.spec SRPM URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid-1.7.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lite, small size and fast log analizer for squid proxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:32:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:32:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506429] New: Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506429 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-eclox.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-eclox-0.8.0-1.20090616svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: Eclox is a doxygen frontend plug-in for eclipse. It aims to provide a slim and sleek integration of the code documentation process into eclipse. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:42:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:42:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506431] New: Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506431 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-texlipse - Eclipse-based Latex plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chitlesh at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-texlipse.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-texlipse-1.3.0-1.20090616cvs.fc11.src.rpm Description: Texlipse is a plugin that adds Latex editing support for the popular Eclipse Java IDE. Key features include: syntax highlight, command completion, bibliography completion, outline navigation and automatic building. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459548] Review Request: php-gtk - GTK PHP extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170951.n5H9pFvc016507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459548 --- Comment #14 from Patrice FERLET 2009-06-17 05:51:11 EDT --- Since several month I'm full of work and I couldn't work on packages. I will work on my packages soon. For now, I have to use F11 and recompile my packages. Regards -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 09:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906170948.n5H9msfs015801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 --- Comment #2 from Tomasz Torcz 2009-06-17 05:48:53 EDT --- I've uploaded -2 version: Spec URL: https://pipebreaker.pl/~zdzichu/pkgs/hdapsd.spec SRPM URL: https://pipebreaker.pl/~zdzichu/pkgs/hdapsd-20090401-2.fc11.src.rpm which marks upstart & udev files as config files. I've left other as non-marked as doc, because %doc causes them to be installed two times. Thank you for your comments Steve! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 10:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 06:02:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - report parser and visualyzer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171002.n5HA2ipu006320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 --- Comment #2 from Aleksey Popkov 2009-06-17 06:02:43 EDT --- Spec URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid.spec SRPM URL: http://aleksey2005.fedorapeople.org/lightsquid-1.7.1-2.fc10.src.rpm Description: Lite, small size and fast log analizer for squid proxy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 11:59:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:59:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] New: Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Summary: Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/twitter-glib.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/twitter-glib-0.9.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Twitter-GLib is a GObject-based library providing a wrapper around the RESTful API of Twitter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:17:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505942] Review Request: php-LightweightPicasaAPI - A lightweight API for Picasa in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171317.n5HDHE7j030390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505942 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 09:17:13 EDT --- OK MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-LightweightPicasaAPI.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-LightweightPicasaAPI-3.3-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-LightweightPicasaAPI-3.3-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . GPLv3+ OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. header in picasa.php states GPLv3, and refers to license.txt, which has GPLv3 or later. OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at localhost SOURCES]$ md5sum LightweightPicasaAPIv3.zip* d7f26f31cb82a8b514ce02394a8a067f LightweightPicasaAPIv3.zip d7f26f31cb82a8b514ce02394a8a067f LightweightPicasaAPIv3.zip.1 OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. No real build - so only dos2unix is needed and specified as a build requires NA MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). OK MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171325.n5HDP4N2032589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:25:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:25:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] New: Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Summary: Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506450 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rest.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/rest-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm This library was designed to make it easier to access web services that claim to be "RESTful". A RESTful service should have urls that represent remote objects, which methods can then be called on. The majority of services don't actually adhere to this strict definition. Instead, their RESTful end point usually has an API that is just simpler to use compared to other types of APIs they may support (XML-RPC, for instance). It is this kind of API that this library is attempting to support. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:24:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:24:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 477683] Review Request: fltk2 - C++ user interface toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171324.n5HDOtFK032240@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477683 --- Comment #17 from Michal Nowak 2009-06-17 09:24:53 EDT --- Thanks for tips Michael, I finally figured it all out: %changelog * Wed Jun 17 2009 Michal Nowak - 2.0.x-0.11.r6786 - disabling the workaroung for fedora < 11 * Wed Jun 17 2009 Michal Nowak - 2.0.x-0.10.r6786 - rpath killer - ? sign killer * Wed Jun 17 2009 Michal Nowak - 2.0.x-0.9.r6786 - setting correct soname * Wed Jun 17 2009 Michal Nowak - 2.0.x-0.8.r6786 - rebuild * Wed Jun 17 2009 Michal Nowak - 2.0.x-0.7.r6786 - fltk-2.0.x-r6786-scandir-workaround.patch to workaroung glibc-2.10 non standard behavior * Tue Jun 16 2009 Michal Nowak - 2.0.x-0.6.r6786 - r6786 - fltk-2.0.x-r6671-non-silence-build.patch newman at dhcp-lab-124 SPECS $ rpmlint /home/newman/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fltk2-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.src.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fltk2-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fltk2-devel-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fltk2-fluid-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fltk2-doc-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/newman/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/fltk2-debuginfo-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.x86_64.rpm fltk2.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libfltk2.so.2.0 exit at GLIBC_2.2.5 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2.spec http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/fltk2-2.0.x-0.11.r6786.fc11.src.rpm dillo-2.1 (pre-release) compilation & run tested against this version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502477] Review Request: arista - Easy to use multimedia transcoder for the GNOME Desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171329.n5HDTff1000996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502477 Marcin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marcin_wolyniak at aster.pl --- Comment #6 from Marcin 2009-06-17 09:29:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > arista-0.9.1-2.fc11.noarch > > [fkooman at localhost ~]$ arista-gtk > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/usr/bin/arista-gtk", line 1244, in > arista.utils.get_path("locale")) > File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/arista/utils.py", line 75, in get_path > "path": path, > IOError: Can't find locale in any known prefix! > [fkooman at localhost ~]$ > > Maybe a dependency missing? Missing locale subdir from sources in /usr/share/arista -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:30:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:30:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171330.n5HDUt2o001615@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500082] Review Request: postal - mail server benchmark In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171334.n5HDYZE1022109@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500082 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #9 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 09:34:34 EDT --- This has been built and pushed to stable - sorry for not adding the bug number to bodhi and thus the failure to autoclose -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:37:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497310] Review Request: php-simplepie - Simple RSS Library in PHP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171337.n5HDbGUj003354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497310 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 09:37:14 EDT --- This has been pushed to stable - apparently forgot to note the bug number in bodhi - apologized for letting it fall through the cracks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 13:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 09:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497140] Review Request: php-IDNA_Convert - Internationalized domain name to UTF-8 converter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171336.n5HDahus023291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497140 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 09:36:42 EDT --- This has been pushed to stable - apparently forgot to note the bug number in bodhi - apologized for letting it fall through the cracks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:07:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:07:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171407.n5HE75pj031619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506486 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] New: Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Summary: Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506476 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mojito.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mojito-0.10.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Mojito is a social data server which will fetch data from the "social web", such as your friend's blog posts and photos, upcoming events, recently played tracks, and pending eBay* auctions. It also provides a service to update your status on web services which support it, such as MySpace* and Twitter*. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:17:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:17:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171417.n5HEHLtV014671@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #21 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-17 10:17:18 EDT --- I don't think that in prep will be of any use as its still in the tarball unless its only an issue if we ship/use it in the final rpms (which we don't anyway as the binaries are only used by the windows builds). I don't believe any of the precompiled stuff is used by the linux build at all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:27:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:27:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506425] Review Request: lightsquid - a light, small and fast log analyzer for squid proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171427.n5HERhWS017116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506425 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: lightsquid |Review Request: lightsquid |- report parser and |- a light, small and fast |visualyzer |log analyzer for squid | |proxy -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171447.n5HElS5R022477@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-17 10:47:27 EDT --- Formal review: [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. No warnings/errors. [OK] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines [OK] MUST: The spec file name match the base package %{name} [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [FAIL] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Source0 URL is not existing. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [TODO] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. The only fix needed is to fix Source0 URL. And it would be good to ask upstream to include license file, but it's not blocking this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:55:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:55:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171455.n5HEtRfT025076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #4 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-17 10:55:26 EDT --- I have uploaded the SRPM with respect to the source0 url. See release -2 again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 14:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171456.n5HEukBQ013504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 10:56:45 EDT --- %{_datadir}/php/* You really want to own EVERYTHING in /usr/share/php/? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:03:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:03:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171503.n5HF3IiQ014865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-06-17 11:03:17 EDT --- Yes ! That is: everything that is installed by this package. This notation does not concern components outside the current package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:00:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:00:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171500.n5HF06xI014330@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-17 11:00:05 EDT --- Updated: Spec URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-veditor.spec SRPM URL: http://chitlesh.fedorapeople.org/RPMS/eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171506.n5HF6rsQ027684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #42 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-17 11:06:50 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Goo-Canvas Short Description: Perl interface to the GooCanvas Owners: liangsuilong Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: liangsuilong Cvsextras Commits: yes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171508.n5HF8x4F028398@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-17 11:08:58 EDT --- Thanks. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:20:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:20:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171520.n5HFKDP8031680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-17 11:20:12 EDT --- After going through the MUST list: rpmlint: rest.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 should be License: LGPLv2 Some cosmetic things: BuildRequires: gtk-doc is not really necessary , the tarball has that already built. You can use %configure --disable-static and spare one rm line later. The source tarball matches upstream, the package builds in rawhide i386 and x86_64 mock. After the license is is fixed this package looks fit to be APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171521.n5HFLHOV019658@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-06-17 11:21:16 EDT --- David, Patrick is correct. Since the only installed files in /usr/share/php are: /usr/share/php/hcard.profile.php /usr/share/php/hkit.class.php those are the only files owned by this package. The key thing is that it does not own /usr/share/php, which is good. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171523.n5HFNUqi020007@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 --- Comment #10 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 11:23:29 EDT --- ok - the fedora package will be noarch - verified that it works correctly on rawhide x86_64 - correctly pulls and uses jss.x86_64 Spec URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-console.spec SRPM URL: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-console-1.1.3-2.src.rpm Description: A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server. This is a rename of fedora-idm-console to 389-console. Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 e9152a2e523a2890767a91cb338e2974 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 73068de75b616d8d49ac570d23c007fec882bd89 389-console-1.1.3.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:40:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:40:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171540.n5HFe8cs024325@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:47:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:47:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506517] New: Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506517 Summary: Review Request: phpFlickr - PHP client library for Flickr Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/phpFlickr.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/phpFlickr-2.3.0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: PHP client for the Flickr web service. It has functions that return the responses from Flickr's API in a meaningful way for PHP developers. It will also contain functions that aggregate data from multiple methods. Compatible with PHP4 and PHP5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 15:51:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:51:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171551.n5HFps6Z007171@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-17 11:51:53 EDT --- I'll update the above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171609.n5HG9l0w011921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 12:09:46 EDT --- OK MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ./php-hkit.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/php-hkit-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/php-hkit-0.5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . LGPLv2+ [] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. LGPLv2+ is cited in the class file, which maches what is in the spec NA MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. Not included. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at localhost SOURCES]$ md5sum hkit-v0.5.tgz* 37f3c192a94a86cd96770d53b3f22095 hkit-v0.5.tgz 37f3c192a94a86cd96770d53b3f22095 hkit-v0.5.tgz.1 OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. Approved -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171619.n5HGJOF2002422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #4 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:19:23 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:17:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:17:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500713] Review Request: 389-ds-base - renamed from fedora-ds-base In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171617.n5HGH4wh002089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500713 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:17:01 EDT --- tagging fixed - built for f12 in koji -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:22:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171622.n5HGMWvg015236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |501393(389-dsgw) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:20:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:20:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171620.n5HGKqOa015024@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:20:51 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:22:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171622.n5HGMVEo015207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |500506(389-adminutil) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:21:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:21:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171621.n5HGLHcm003355@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:21:17 EDT --- ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:20:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:20:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171620.n5HGK6Lk002961@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #9 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:20:05 EDT --- The tagging issue has been resolved. This this package request approved? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:20:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:20:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171620.n5HGKMnS003070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |500746(389-admin) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171620.n5HGKLbk003041@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |500506(389-adminutil) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171625.n5HGP7mO016000@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #4 from Ville Skytt? 2009-06-17 12:25:05 EDT --- I think obsoleting lzma-libs and lzma-devel is definitely premature, and providing them is wrong and should never happen (obsoletion _only_ without provides when the time is right to drop lzma). xz-libs does *not* provide the stuff in lzma-libs (liblzmadec) and xz-devel does not IIRC provide the headers and pkgconfig file that lzma-devel does, and we have packages depending on both in the repo, at least libarchive, never mind people's local builds against lzma-libs/-devel. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Renaming.2Freplacing_existing_packages Yes, "beta" should be in the release tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:29:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:29:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171629.n5HGTMcU005558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-17 12:29:21 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: eclipse-veditor Short Description: Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin Owners: chitlesh Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:34:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:34:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171634.n5HGYhHJ006737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:34:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:32:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:32:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171632.n5HGWwvp006534@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:32:57 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171631.n5HGVkZO006363@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:31:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171633.n5HGXcKE017633@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:33:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:34:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506231] Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171634.n5HGYEx7017730@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506231 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:34:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171637.n5HGbcpm018748@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:37:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171636.n5HGatQp018665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #17 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:36:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:39:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:39:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171639.n5HGdChh007776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:39:11 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171638.n5HGcPoL007647@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #24 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:38:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:40:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:40:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171640.n5HGeOm0008297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:40:23 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:41:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:41:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171641.n5HGfK5Z008589@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 12:41:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:48:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171648.n5HGmmjf010068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #7 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-17 12:48:47 EDT --- Whee, I just learned how to do MIME types. :) I'll submit a patch for libconcord which defines appropriate files to be of type application/x-libconcord , and an updated congruity package with a .desktop file that specifies it can handle this MIME type. I believe that would be correct. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171645.n5HGjQDT009552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |yaneti at declera.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-17 12:45:24 EDT --- MUST: twitter-glib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ Should be License: LGPLv2 Cosmetic: URL: http://live.gnome.org/TwitterGlib makes more sense I think. BuildRequires: gtk-doc is not really necessary , the tarball has that already built. The package has a testsuite that doesn't seem to do anything network related. You could add %check make check With the license change this package is APPROVED. I am not sure why this is a blocker for the rest review... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 16:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 12:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501393] Review Request: 389-dsgw - 389 Directory Server Gateway In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171655.n5HGtbBZ011902@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501393 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 12:55:35 EDT --- tagging issue fixed - built in koji for f12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:14:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:14:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171714.n5HHEIxd016151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #10 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-17 13:14:16 EDT --- Good: + Name of the SPEC file matches with package name. + Pakcage name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag show on proper project homepage + Package contains valid license tag + License tag state GPLv2 as a valid OSS license + Package contains no subpackages + Provides/Obsoletes statement for renaming process are ok. + BuildRoot will be cleaned at the beginnung of %clean and %install + Could download upstream tar ball via spectool -g + Package source matches with upstream (md5sum: cd3fd64fabc0265e2765101d032d7150) + Package contains proper BuildRoot definition + Package honour $RPM_OPT_FLAGS + Package support SMP-enabled build + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent on debuginfo rpm + Local install/uninstall works fine + Scratch build works fine + Files has proper files permission + %files stanza contains no duplicated entries + All package files are owned by this package + No package files are belong to a other package + %doc stanza is mall, no extra sub package is required + Package contains proper changelog Bad: - I have found source files which state GPLv2+ or AL 2.0 as license. Please clarify the stated license on the license tag - Package only contains the LICENSE file, but the COPYING file, which contains the verbatin text of the GPLv2 is not included - Usage of the %{_initrddir} macro is obsoleted - Why do you set the owner/permission of some files explicitly in the %post scriptlet? - warning from rpmlint about source rpm. rpmlint 389-admin-1.1.7-5.fc11.src.rpm 389-admin.src: W: strange-permission 389-admin-git.sh 0775 - Warnings from rpmlint about the binary rpm $ rpmlint 389-admin-1.1.7-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm 389-admin.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod 389-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:40:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:40:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171740.n5HHeQaA000985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-17 13:40:25 EDT --- eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:40:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171740.n5HHeL1F022811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-17 13:40:20 EDT --- eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:47:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171747.n5HHl5JW024173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #22 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-17 13:47:02 EDT --- It has been a standard procedure to remove the prebuilt binaries (whether they are used or not). I saw and applied this on so many different packages that I forgot that there is no specific guideline for it except this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries Since this guideline does not cover your case, I cannot claim that it is a blocker for the review. But I'd be happy if you reconsider. At the end of the day, it is your responsibility that the prebuilt binaries do not end up in the RPM's. Removing them in %prep may only make your life easier. Working on a "clean" source tree is a good thing, at least IMHO. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171751.n5HHpkJw003304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-17 13:51:45 EDT --- I've submitted the patch to libconcord: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506536 once that gets applied (the maintainer's very quick to respond), I'll put a new congruity package in this bug, with the MIME type added. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 17:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171753.n5HHrpo8003666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #76 from Ken Crandall 2009-06-17 13:53:41 EDT --- 0.9.12 does not build on F11: main-menu.c: In function 'main_menu_applet_init': main-menu.c:67: warning: implicit declaration of function 'gnome_program_init' main-menu.c:67: error: 'LIBGNOMEUI_MODULE' undeclared (first use in this function) main-menu.c:67: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once main-menu.c:67: error: for each function it appears in.) make[2]: *** [main-menu.o] Error 1 make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... main-menu-ui.c: In function 'item_to_recent_doc_tile': main-menu-ui.c:1087: warning: unused variable 'node' main-menu-ui.c:1085: warning: unused variable 'is_local' main-menu-ui.c:1084: warning: unused variable 'is_nfs' main-menu-ui.c:1083: warning: unused variable 'nfs_id' main-menu-ui.c:1082: warning: unused variable 'file' main-menu-ui.c:1081: warning: unused variable 'volume' main-menu-ui.c:1080: warning: unused variable 'mount' main-menu-ui.c: In function 'item_to_system_tile': main-menu-ui.c:1132: warning: unused variable 'basename' main-menu-ui.c: In function 'app_is_in_blacklist': main-menu-ui.c:1248: warning: implicit declaration of function 'geteuid' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/ken/redhat/BUILD/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12/main-menu/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ken/redhat/BUILD/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12' make: *** [all] Error 2 error: Bad exit status from /home/ken/redhat/TEMP/rpm-tmp.MVyvPe (%build) RPM build errors: Bad exit status from /home/ken/redhat/TEMP/rpm-tmp.MVyvPe (%build) Working on a patch... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171801.n5HI1xsm027652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #77 from Hezekiah M. Carty 2009-06-17 14:01:56 EDT --- The Debian patches may be a good places to start: http://patch-tracking.debian.net/package/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:08:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171808.n5HI8CWW006659@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #78 from Ken Crandall 2009-06-17 14:08:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348312) Patch to fix build on Fedora 11 This patch adds libgnomeui include files (which were missing) and causing the build to fail on Fedora 11. It now builds and works for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487964] Pitivi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171808.n5HI8Yh4006761@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487964 Jonathan Earl Brassow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-package-review at redha | |t.com, notting at redhat.com Component|cman-kernel |Package Review AssignedTo|jbrassow at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Earl Brassow 2009-06-17 14:08:33 EDT --- I'm not sure what this is, but I know it isn't a cman-kernel bug. Is package review the correct component? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:30:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:30:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171830.n5HIUwrI001694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Xavier Guerrin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |xavier.guerrin at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Xavier Guerrin 2009-06-17 14:30:57 EDT --- Hello, At least for the moment, the QElectroTech project team prefers to keep the words "diagram" and "element" (especially this last one) in the application. You are however free to use the wording of your choice for the RPM package. Cheers, Xavier QElectroTech project developer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:37:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:37:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171837.n5HIbY6D003225@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-17 14:37:32 EDT --- vfrnav-0.3-8.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/vfrnav-0.3-8.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:39:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171839.n5HIdqhA013523@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-17 14:39:51 EDT --- Ok, there is another iteration of packages here: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 18:57:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 14:57:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506567] New: Review Request: acl2 - Automated reasoning system based on Common Lisp Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: acl2 - Automated reasoning system based on Common Lisp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506567 Summary: Review Request: acl2 - Automated reasoning system based on Common Lisp Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: amdunn at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://www.openproofs.org/packages/acl2/acl2.spec SRPM URL: https://www.openproofs.org/packages/acl2/acl2-3.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: ACL2 is an automated reasoning system developed at Computational Logic, Inc., and the University of Texas at Austin. It is valuable if you want to prove properties about a system that can be easily modeled as recursive functions in a Lisp-based language. ACL2 stands for "A Computational Logic for Applicative Common Lisp", and is simultaneously a computational logic, formal specification language, programming system, and theorem prover. Its syntax is based on Common Lisp, and many ACL2 specifications are executable (depending on how ACL2 is used). This package is largely complete in that it allows the user to use the vast majority of the functionality of ACL2, the main thing that isn't quite right (that I've been working with upstream to fix) is that some of the (supplementary - program works without them) elisp files don't seem to compile and/or give warnings. I have tested a built version out with some of my own basic usage and have encountered no problems (eg: books load properly despite having moved things around - to comply with packaging policy - compared to their original locations in a usual install). rpmlint output with my comments: acl2.i386: E: devel-dependency acl2-books-source acl2-books-source is not really a "devel" repository in that it contains the text of the theorem libraries, not of the LISP that runs ACL2 itself. It is critical to using the theorem prover to have this text available. My naming convention matches the Debian package. acl2.i386: E: no-binary acl2.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I believe this is wrong - saved_acl2.core is a binary core file (platform dependent I believe) used by LISP. acl2-books.i386: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib I believe the .fasl files are also binary and platform dependent. acl2-books.i386: W: no-documentation acl2-books-certs.noarch: W: no-documentation acl2-books-source.noarch: W: no-documentation acl2-emacs-el.noarch: W: no-documentation acl2-xemacs-el.noarch: W: no-documentation True, but not important IMO (acl2-doc has documentation). acl2-doc.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /usr/share/doc/acl2-3.5/HTML 0775 A standard directory should have permission set to 0755. If you get this message, it means that you have wrong directory permissions in some dirs included in your package. This actually appears to be wrong, though I thought this was actually corrected... (rebuilding now) This package has built in Koji for F11: x86: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1406611 x86_64: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1406769 and I am rebuilding it now for F12 (builds unfortunately take a long time). Issues that I see: 1) Elisp compilation as above (the compiled elisp packages currently don't work, but downloading the elisp source packages still allows one to use the supplementary LISP). 2) This package includes a LISP core. This core is specific to a given version and implementation of LISP (eg: if built with F10, it would be SBCL v1.0.22 as of now). Is there a good way of dealing with this? (Should I have Fedora version-dependent conditionals that BuildRequire and Require certain versions of LISP?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:12:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171912.n5HJCjwE020609@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171913.n5HJDq9s010755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-17 15:13:51 EDT --- adding FE_NEEDSPONSOR blocker. I'll look things over. If kosher, I can sponsor here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:24:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:24:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503297] Review Request: panoglview - Immersive viewer for spherical panoramas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171924.n5HJO0pU023422@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503297 --- Comment #2 from Bruno Postle 2009-06-17 15:23:59 EDT --- Thanks I've fixed %defattr and added %{?_smp_mflags}, I've left --vendor="" as this is required for it to build on el4 and el5: http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/panoglview/panoglview.spec http://bpostle.fedorapeople.org/reviews/panoglview/panoglview-0.2.2-4.fc10.src.rpm I forgot to add that the way to test this package is to download some typical equirectangular panoramas and try to view them: http://www.flickr.com/search/?q=equirectangular&l=commderiv&ss=2&ct=6&w=all&adv=1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:29:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:29:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171929.n5HJTSrN014204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #6 from Jon Baker 2009-06-17 15:29:27 EDT --- I just successfully installed this on my FC11 RT3 via the download and instructions - it was very easy and intalled without any issue. I'd submit it but I have no idea how ... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493335] Review Request: perl-RTx-Calendar - Calendar for RT due tasks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171933.n5HJX9gm015243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493335 --- Comment #7 from Jon Baker 2009-06-17 15:33:08 EDT --- Never mind, just noticed the comments about /usr/lib and checked, sure enough, that is where it was installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171934.n5HJYjBW015425@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #9 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-17 15:34:44 EDT --- A few minor comments, 1. MUST: remove the ldconfig scriplets. ldconfig is needed only for shlibs, these aren't. 2. SHOULD: Source should include snap or svn in the name, to match Release tag. For examples, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages 2a. poke/prod upstream to do a real release. :) 3. Kinda-sorta-should: make a parent virtual package that Requires all subpkgs, so one can do a simple: yum install bespin to get it all at once. (but, this is a matter of taste, up to you whether you want to do it or not). Heck, taking this to an extreme, if you also want to simplify matters further, including everything in a single pkg would be ok with me too. I don't consider any of these issues blockers, and can very well be fixed prior to building (before or after import). Being your first package, I'll add myself as comaintainer, and continue to advise as needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171937.n5HJbJjE026676@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-17 15:37:18 EDT --- Last small suggestion, leave the pkg name and versioning details out of Summary, so use something like: Summary: a style for Qt/KDE s/style/theme/ to taste. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171935.n5HJZFNx015839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:42:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:42:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506231] Review Request: hunspell-smj - Lule Sami hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171942.n5HJgLv1017531@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506231 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171941.n5HJf5Jv017338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #16 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-17 15:41:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > > MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > > NEEDSWORK > > - This is a python module, so the correct name is python-healpy. > > Sorry, I didn't know this is a hard rule since the python modules it depends > on, numpy, scipy and pyfits don't follow it. > > However fixed: Done. *whoops* I though the guideline was that the name must begin with python- if it doesn't start with py, but actually it is "If the upstream source has "py" (or "Py") in its name, you can use that name for the package. So, for example, pygtk is acceptable." http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29 So the name should be after all just healpy. Sorry for the mixup :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506176] Review Request: hunspell-ko - Korean hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171945.n5HJjpuM029040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506176 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:56:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:56:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171956.n5HJuWjm031233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #25 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-06-17 15:56:30 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348333) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348333) policy changes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:56:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:56:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] New: Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Summary: Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lpoetter at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://0pointer.de/public/rtkit.spec SRPM URL: http://0pointer.de/public/rtkit-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon This finally allows us us to securely enable RT scheduling by default for user software such as PulseAudio which really could benefit from it. This is a dependency of upcoming PA 0.9.16. This all depends on a kernel patch that is already in Ingo's tree on the way into mainline and Kyle wants to integrate into the Rawhide kernel very soon. On systems that lack this patch you'll just get a bit of spew in syslog, and clients won't be allowed to get RT scheduling, but nothing should fail beyond that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 19:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906171957.n5HJvvNT031489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #26 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-06-17 15:57:56 EDT --- I think that with the policy changes (exercising Dan's polgen.py along the way), I think we'll have it sorted soon. Ok to get going on CVS? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:02:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:02:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172002.n5HK2euU022126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Bug 504710 depends on bug 504709, which changed state. Bug 504709 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504709] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_activerecord - Localization support for ActiveRecord by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172002.n5HK2d9w022100@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504709 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-17 16:02:38 EDT --- Rebuilt and push request submitted, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] New: Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Summary: Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope.spec SRPM URL: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope-1.1-1.gitfccbbd6.fc12.src.rpm Description: xscope sits in-between an X11 client and an X11 server and prints the contents of each request, reply, error, or event that is communicated between them. This information can be useful in debugging and performance tuning of X11 servers and clients. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172018.n5HKILCT025635@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 --- Comment #11 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-17 16:18:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bespin Short Description: A style for Qt/KDE4 Owners: jknife rdieter Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:18:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:18:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172018.n5HKIkj1025711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172019.n5HKJjqq025829@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 --- Comment #49 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-17 16:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #48) > > > Excellent. Mauricio, please go to the account system and apply for the packager > > > group: > > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ > > mmm, kind of lost here, I have a fedora account but I supose to "join a > > group"?, is that is the case, what is the mono group name? > > The group is called 'packager' ok "buhochileno has applied to packager! ", sorry for the late...I'm really bussy right now, so hope that there is not to much step on front!!! > > > > Note that once I've sponsored you, you'll be on step #4 here: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process > > don't know what to do with that :-S ...thanks Toshio... > > Look at this to > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_Sponsored looking... > > Paul Mauricio -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 20:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172052.n5HKqGWR001448@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #11 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-17 16:52:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Bad: > - I have found source files which state GPLv2+ or AL 2.0 as > license. Please clarify the stated license on the license tag > - Package only contains the LICENSE file, but the COPYING file, > which contains the verbatin text of the GPLv2 is not included > - Usage of the %{_initrddir} macro is obsoleted - all of the files in the adminserver (except the Apache modules) should have been gplv2 - this has been fixed, including the LICENSE file - there are two Apache modules included with the admin server that are licensed under the apl 2.0 - mod_admserv and mod_restartd - these must use the apl because they use apl code - how should I denote this? - fixed _initrddir > - Why do you set the owner/permission of some files explicitly in the > %post scriptlet? There is a "bug" or perhaps it is a feature of rpm that it does not preserve the ownership/permissions of files/directories marked config noreplace. These are files and directories which users are accustomed to changing. If we do not explicitly save and preserve the owner/permission in pre/post, upgrade will break existing installations. I know it is somewhat of a hack, but this is the only way I could get it to work. Suggestions are welcome. > - warning from rpmlint about source rpm. > rpmlint 389-admin-1.1.7-5.fc11.src.rpm > 389-admin.src: W: strange-permission 389-admin-git.sh 0775 - fixed > - Warnings from rpmlint about the binary rpm > $ rpmlint 389-admin-1.1.7-5.fc11.x86_64.rpm > 389-admin.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post chmod > 389-admin.x86_64: W: incoherent-init-script-name dirsrv-admin - the init script and service name are dirsrv-admin - this was a conscious decision not to tie it to the package name new SRPM: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-1.1.7-5.src.rpm new Spec: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin.spec new Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 1844088cbe44bc9eda371ce606a38405 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 e6f9beea076220f485aa93c990935dd0134a18da 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 21:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172104.n5HL4WS5004083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |a.badger at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |a.badger at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 21:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172105.n5HL5hec004734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-17 17:05:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: trac-peerreview-plugin New Branches: EL-5 Owners: chitlesh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 21:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172148.n5HLmc6J023858@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Harry Dance changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harryrdance at googlemail.com --- Comment #23 from Harry Dance 2009-06-17 17:48:34 EDT --- Hi, in the meantime, please could someone explain the best way to install these plugins? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 21:58:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:58:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172158.n5HLwnHN016177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 21:59:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:59:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172159.n5HLx2fi016228@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 21:59:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 17:59:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172159.n5HLx9N5026340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 22:23:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:23:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172223.n5HMNq3p020966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #17 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-17 18:23:50 EDT --- > > So the name should be after all just healpy. Sorry for the mixup :) Okay, name changed back. The new files are again at: Spec URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy.spec SRPM URL: http://jsmidt.fedorapeople.org/healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 17 23:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 19:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487964] Pitivi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906172333.n5HNX5a1001427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487964 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-17 19:33:04 EDT --- This certainly isn't a package review ticket; there's no package submission to review. Plus, pitivi is in the distro already (and has been for many years), so I don't really understand the point of this ticket. I'll just close it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 00:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 20:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180013.n5I0Dvvr008731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #1 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-17 20:13:55 EDT --- A couple easy ones that I found before the licensing audit: * Summary does not need to repeat the module name. Maybe something like:: Integration of several JavaScript text editors with Zikula * Includes JavaScript libraries. Until JavaScript Guidelines are approved, this is okay. Once they are we'll have to package the JavaScript libraries separately and then have this package link to them (perhaps with a literal symlink). Here's the big one: * Licensing violations :-( Most of the files are a mix of GPLv2+, LGPLv2+ (Might have some v2 only but I haven't checked yet), and BSD. This places the module as a whole under the GPLv2+ (or v2 if there's any v2 only code). So far this is fine. But we do have some GPL incompatible licensed code as well that we have to deal with, either by getting rid of it (some things aren't necessary) or rewriting or relicensing: (Note scribite/modules/scribite/pndocs/fckeditor_license.txt is licensed under MPLv1.1+ or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+. This is fine) Creative Commons Licenses: No CC licenses are GPL compatible: This one could be a problem: * scribite/modules/scribite/pnjavascript/window.js: Some of the file is MIT-like. But about three-quarters of the way through the file we have: Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License - http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/skins/inditreuse/README:This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/skins/titan/README:This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/CharacterMap/character-map.js: license : "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License" * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/HtmlEntities/html-entities.js: license : "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License" * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/ListType/list-type.js: license : "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License" PHP License: PHP License v3 is definitely GPL incompatible. I do not know if PHP License v2.02 is also. * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/ImageManager/Classes/GD.php: This is licensed under the php-2.02 license. * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/ImageManager/Classes/NetPBM.php: This is licensed under the php-2.02 license. * scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/ImageManager/Classes/IM.php: This is licensed under the php-2.02 license. scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/plugins/ImageManager/Classes/Transform.php MPL: Unless the MPL lists other licenses that the work can be released under (ie,dual licensed with GPL) this is incompatible with the GPL scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/tiny_mce/filemanager/connectors/php/Commands/helpers/header.cgi: MPLv1.1 scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/tiny_mce/filemanager/connectors/php/Commands/helpers/progress.cgi: MPLv1.1 scribite/javascript/scribite_editors/tiny_mce/filemanager/connectors/php/Commands/helpers/upload.cgi: MPLv1.1 itbegins thinks that with the exception of scribite/modules/scribite/pnjavascript/window.js, all of these files are optional and we could remove them when we package. window.js might be optional as well, but he's not sure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 01:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180136.n5I1aHVU023097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #11 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-17 21:36:15 EDT --- Updated http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 02:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180211.n5I2BBPP008719@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 22:11:10 EDT --- I contacted upstream about these issues: http://groups.google.com/group/zikula-discussions/browse_thread/thread/7035a2a62e86e8d4# -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 02:22:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:22:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180222.n5I2MKxP032123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 02:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180236.n5I2aY1P004153@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |david at gnsa.us AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |david at gnsa.us Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 03:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:04:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180304.n5I34M4D009921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-06-17 23:04:21 EDT --- OK: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ./zikula-module-crpTag.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/zikula-module-crpTag-0.1.3-2.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/zikula-module-crpTag-0.1.3-2.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. OK: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . There are some MIT licensed javascript files, the balance appears to be LGPLv2.1+ FIX: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. So in looking at this - the source repeatedly says it's GNU/GPL v2.1 with lines like the below: * @license GNU/GPL - v.2.1 However, to my knowledge there is no GPLv2.1. Further the license.txt in pndocs/license.txt is a copy of the LGPLv2.1+ You may want to contact upstream for clarification. At the very minimum you'll want to change the spec file to reflect that it's LGPLv2+ from it's current GPLv2 - but safe bet is to contact upstream and ensure that's really what they meant and to hopefully get it changed in source. OK: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc OK: The spec file must be written in American English. OK: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines [ke4qqq at nalleyt61 SOURCES]$ md5sum ./*crp*.zip 51ff4ac0f569e144e07cd886ec0f1fd0 ./crpTag_0.1.3.zip 51ff4ac0f569e144e07cd886ec0f1fd0 ./tags_crpTag_0.1.3-r114.zip OK: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Nothing required - just a bunch of copying in 'build' NA: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: Each package must consistently use macros. OK: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 03:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180335.n5I3ZDqn026162@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #9 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-17 23:35:12 EDT --- I sent a patch upstream to congruity to add a .desktop file to associate with the MIME type from the libconcord patch: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2808133&group_id=231128&atid=1082218 here's an updated congruity build which bumps to 10, adds this patch, and fixes a couple other minor things. http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity.spec http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity-10-1.aw_fc12.src.rpm could someone please complete this review? -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 03:48:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:48:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180348.n5I3mHsL028489@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 03:48:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:48:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180348.n5I3mJNg028535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 Bug 426754 depends on bug 426750, which changed state. Bug 426750 Summary: Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 04:06:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:06:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180406.n5I46L76021422@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #10 from Stephen Warren 2009-06-18 00:06:20 EDT --- congruity-11 is released with the .desktop patch included. Is there a mechanism to create/admin Fedora packages from Ubuntu? I converted all my client machines... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 05:44:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:44:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180544.n5I5iwYC017524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 01:44:57 EDT --- not reliably, the conventions and formats are too different. I'm happy to maintain congruity for Fedora if that would be OK with you, though, Stephen... -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 05:52:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:52:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180552.n5I5qHrC019164@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #12 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 01:52:16 EDT --- You might want to grab your brown paper bag - you left the .desktop file out of the 11 release tarball :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 06:16:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 02:16:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180616.n5I6GQrG013255@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #13 from Stephen Warren 2009-06-18 02:16:26 EDT --- Crap, I forgot my release script had an explicit file list in it. I'll fix that up tomorrow I hope. Yes, I'm fine with you maintaining this in Fedora if you want; having it packaged would be great. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 08:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180811.n5I8Bhqb005745@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #12 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-18 04:11:42 EDT --- Jan Klepek, Do you know deluge and vuze? They also contain a lot of plugins by default. Although Some features are added into the application, they have an important effect on this program. So in my opinion there is no need to divide shutter into two packages -- shutter and shutter-plugins. As a matter of fact, it is not convenient for users to install shutter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 08:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180823.n5I8Ns9j008447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-18 04:23:53 EDT --- - The COPYING file actually belongs to healpix c++, but it doesn't matter since both are gpl. Everything seems to be fixed now, so the package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 08:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH adds easy access to a DBI database handle to your CGI::Application modules. Lazy loading is used to prevent a database connection from being made if the dbh method is not called during the request. In other words, the database connection is not created until it is actually needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 08:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 04:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides a shortcut for the common need of returning a simple error message to the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 09:01:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:01:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180901.n5I91dk4016291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 09:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180933.n5I9XN7B023047@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #18 from Levente Farkas 2009-06-18 05:33:21 EDT --- i updated the spec: http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SPECS/mingw32-gstreamer.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SRPMS/mingw32-gstreamer-0.10.23-1.src.rpm koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1422548 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 09:37:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:37:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906180937.n5I9bRhB032201@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-06-18 05:37:25 EDT --- Many thanks for the review, David. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-hkit Short Description: Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page Owners: monnerat Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 09:43:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:43:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506678] New: Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ky.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-ky-0.20090414-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 09:46:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:46:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506680] New: Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-quh.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-quh-0.20081017-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 09:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:52:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] New: Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Summary: Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jchadima at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/autodafe/autodafe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/autodafe/autodafe-0.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Autodaf? is a fuzzing framework able to uncover buffer overflows by using the fuzzing by weighting attacks with markers technique. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:17:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:17:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506678] Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181017.n5IAHdWo000673@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:17:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:17:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506680] Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181017.n5IAHtkl000719@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506678] Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181055.n5IAtCD8017952@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-18 06:55:11 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1422635 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 310367cbba994992bd801f13827ecd45f9bd2227 aspell6-ky-0.01-0.tar.bz2 + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181057.n5IAvIO8018479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-18 06:57:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1422631 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 4b72250fa6764effbc2e8d9c0d212f65306478fe CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=2, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.14 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.21 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20-1.fc12.noarch=> Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::ErrorPage) = 1.20 Requires: perl(Params::Validate) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 10:55:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 06:55:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506680] Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181055.n5IAtBld008701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-18 06:55:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1422629 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 38ad7fca65c8e9dae25f8d99e8f85d75ad62a1bd quh_BO-pack.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:00:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:00:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181100.n5IB0n1D019441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 07:00:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > MUST: > twitter-glib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > Should be License: LGPLv2 I put that because from the README file: Twitter-GLib is released under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public License version 2.1 or, at your option, any later version. > Cosmetic: > > URL: http://live.gnome.org/TwitterGlib > makes more sense I think. Will do, I never found that one previously :) > BuildRequires: gtk-doc > is not really necessary , the tarball has that already built. > > The package has a testsuite that doesn't seem to do anything network related. > You could add > %check > make check > > With the license change this package is APPROVED. > > I am not sure why this is a blocker for the rest review... It shouldn't have been, but I was looking at hundreds of deps/bz bugs etc yesterday so it was probably a brain fart. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:09:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:09:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181109.n5IB92AY020873@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 07:09:01 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rest Short Description: A library for access to RESTful web services Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181112.n5IBC4KZ012483@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-18 07:12:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1419943 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e77324778be206a57478eb2ef386a879c8a2e2ff urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Should: 1) I don't think forcefully keeping timestamp of upstream file in which you already deleted one line is a good idea. I will suggest you only use sed -i -e "s|#!/usr/bin/env python||" urllib2_kerberos.py and let new timestamp be installed. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:38:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:38:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181138.n5IBcc0K017891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.14-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:38:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:38:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181138.n5IBcXft017854@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Bug 478926 depends on bug 478923, which changed state. Bug 478923 Summary: Review Request: globus-ftp-client - Globus Toolkit - GridFTP Client Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478923 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:38:32 EDT --- globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:41:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:41:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181141.n5IBfs2J028851@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:41:52 EDT --- mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:40:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:40:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181140.n5IBekXo028559@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:40:44 EDT --- R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc10, R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc10, R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc10, R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc10, R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc10, R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-Biobase R-RUnit R-IRanges R-BSgenome R-BufferedMatrixMethods R-Biostrings'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6530 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181139.n5IBd6Lu027656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:39:04 EDT --- perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6512 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:43:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:43:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181143.n5IBhuax019641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:43:56 EDT --- globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:44:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:44:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181144.n5IBifE3019993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:44:40 EDT --- mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-16.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181144.n5IBik7P020036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.8.2-16.fc11 |3.8.2-16.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:41:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:41:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492501] Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181141.n5IBfxEb019177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.8.2-16.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:42:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:42:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181142.n5IBghA3019302@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:42:42 EDT --- perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-HTML-FillInForm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6553 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:43:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:43:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181143.n5IBhYdI019542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:43:33 EDT --- perl-Pod-Xhtml-1.59-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Pod-Xhtml'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6560 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181144.n5IBi2sK029472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.14-1.fc11 |4.14-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181144.n5IBiRfi029794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:44:24 EDT --- olpc-kbdshim-6-4.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:44:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:44:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495902] Review Request: olpc-kbdshim - grab key and better rotation support for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181144.n5IBiXEr029991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495902 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|6-4.fc11 |6-4.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:49:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:49:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181149.n5IBnY6Q021847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.14-1.fc10 |4.14-1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:49:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:49:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478926] Review Request: globus-gass-copy - Globus Toolkit - Globus Gass Copy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181149.n5IBnT8a021805@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478926 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:49:28 EDT --- globus-gass-copy-4.14-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:47:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:47:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181147.n5IBlhd7021328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:47:42 EDT --- perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6577 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:48:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:48:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181148.n5IBmSDP021580@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:48:26 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Webdav'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6584 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:51:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181151.n5IBpFGb032174@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:51:13 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:51:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:51:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181151.n5IBpLWH032239@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.78-1.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:52:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:52:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181152.n5IBqGel032469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:52:15 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update php-ezc-Webdav'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-6620 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:50:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:50:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181150.n5IBo74F031789@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:50:06 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-ezc-Webdav'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6602 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:54:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:54:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181154.n5IBs67P000638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:54:05 EDT --- lcdf-typetools-2.78-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501854] Review Request: lcdf-typetools - The LCDF Typetools for manipulating OpenType fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181154.n5IBsCY2000697@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501854 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.78-1.fc10 |2.78-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:03:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:03:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181203.n5IC3Bx3026727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-18 08:03:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > MUST: > > twitter-glib.src: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1+ > > Should be License: LGPLv2 > > I put that because from the README file: > Twitter-GLib is released under the terms of the GNU Lesser General > Public License version 2.1 or, at your option, any later version. Oh, very sorry, I've missed the any later part. :/ According to the guidelines the short form of this to be used in spec files is: LGPLv2+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181217.n5ICHMrP030550@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 08:17:21 EDT --- Thanks for the update. I've fixed it on my local copy ready for commit. Thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181218.n5ICIic3031016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 08:18:43 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: twitter-glib Short Description: A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:20:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:20:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506678] Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181220.n5ICK9eQ008619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-18 08:20:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-ky Short Description: Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:19:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:19:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506680] Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181219.n5ICJGF5008173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-18 08:19:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-quh Short Description: Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 11:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490722] Review Request: R-BSgenome - Infrastructure for Biostrings-based genome data packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181159.n5IBx03t025067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490722 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 07:58:59 EDT --- R-Biobase-2.4.1-1.fc11, R-RUnit-0.4.22-1.fc11, R-IRanges-1.2.3-1.fc11, R-BSgenome-1.12.2-1.fc11, R-BufferedMatrixMethods-1.8.0-3.fc11, R-Biostrings-2.12.6-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update R-Biobase R-RUnit R-IRanges R-BSgenome R-BufferedMatrixMethods R-Biostrings'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6673 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181225.n5ICPYXV010146@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mcepl at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-18 08:25:32 EDT --- + GOOD: rpmlint is bradford:rpmbuild$ rpmlint -i SRPMS/autodafe-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. bradford:rpmbuild$ rpmlint -i RPMS/x86_64/autodafe-* autodafe.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-1 ['1:0.1-1.fc11', '1:0.1-1'] The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. bradford:rpmbuild$ silent on both source and binary package. Warning doesn't make any sense to me and should be ignored. + GOOD: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . + GOOD: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. ???: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines . + BAD: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. 1) # -*- coding: utf-8 -*- in the top is not needed ... .spec files are in Fedora UTF-8 per definition. 2) This is not good: mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr -C src/adbg install make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr -C src/adc install make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr -C src/autodafe install make prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr -C src/pdml2ad install ( cd ./etc/generator; ./generator.sh . ) mv ./etc/generator/autodafe $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share You should use %{_prefix}, %{_datadir}, %{_bindir}, %{_sysconfdir}, etc. + GOOD: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - GOOD: LICENSE file is in %doc. + GOOD: The spec file is written in American English. + GOOD: The spec file for the package is legible. + BAD: The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. No URL in Source: should be Source: autodafe-%{version}.tar.gz http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz then OK. MD5: 1c10c69080952ab9dd2c819d1e9c044c + GOOD: The package successfully compiles and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Koji scratch build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1422739 + GOOD: builds on all architectures + GOOD: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. (builds in koji) + GOOD: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. No locale support. + GOOD: %post and %postun scripts OK no scripts + GOOD: not relocatable + BAD: A package owns all directories that it creates. I don't like this in %files: %{_usr}/share/* a) you should use macros, b) how many directories in %{_datadir} you want? Just write them down in %files individually. The same for %{_bindir}/* This is not safe. + GOOD: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. + GOOD: Permissions on files must be set properly. + GOOD: Each package have a %clean section. + BAD: Each package consistently use macros. see above + GOOD: The package contains code, or permissable content. + BAD: No large documentation files, so no a -doc subpackage. at least tutorials.tar.gz should go to -doc (or to hell ;-)) + GOOD: Files registered in %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. + GOOD: No header files. + GOOD: No static libraries. + GOOD: No pkgconfig(.pc) files. + GOOD: .so file is provided in -devel package. no .so file + GOOD: Correct Requires in -devel subpackage. no -devel package + GOOD: No .la libtool archives. + GOOD: Packages does not contain GUI applications. + GOOD: Packages does not own files or directories owned by other packages. + GOOD: Runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT in %install + GOOD: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. + GOOD: Includes license text. NOT APPROVED Please fix the above shown problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:34:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:34:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181234.n5ICYIvL002376@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:55:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181255.n5ICtPMd007638@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-18 08:55:23 EDT --- Any progress with the dependencies? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 12:59:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:59:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181259.n5ICxqgq008451@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #12 from Valent Turkovic 2009-06-18 08:59:50 EDT --- When you manage to fix your current issues and build packages if you need somebody to test it I'm your man ;) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:04:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:04:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] New: Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Summary: Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libccss.spec SRPMS: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/libccss-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Libccss offers a simple API to * Parse CSS stylesheets. * Query for style configurations on a user-provided document representation. * Draw query results onto cairo surfaces [1]. libccss has been split off the gtk-css-engine into a standalone project. Please refer to the documentation and example code shipped with the tarball for information how to use this software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:24:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:24:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] New: Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Summary: Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: varekova at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/uClibc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/uClibc-0.9.30.1-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: uClibc is a C library for developing embedded Linux systems. It is much smaller than the GNU C Library, but nearly all applications supported by glibc also work perfectly with uClibc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:28:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:28:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] New: Package Review: nbtk - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: nbtk - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Summary: Package Review: nbtk - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:31:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:31:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181331.n5IDVQKB016769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506721 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:31:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:31:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181331.n5IDVONg016720@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506446(FedoraMoblin) Depends on| |506712 --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 09:31:23 EDT --- SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/nbtk.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/nbtk-0.9.3-1.fc11.src.rpm The Netbook Toolkit is a GUI toolkit, using Clutter and is optimised for the Moblin netbook experience. It consists of various classes useful for building UIs such as Buttons, Tooltips, Scrollbars and others. It also supports styling through CSS stylesheets. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:48:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181348.n5IDmbc4021174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Package Review: nbtk - A |Package Review: nbtk - A |simple api for CSS |toolkit for moblin NetBooks |Stylesheets | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:50:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:50:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181350.n5IDoEiO032229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mclasen at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:50:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:50:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181350.n5IDoRPT032383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-18 09:50:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-urllib2_kerberos Short Description: Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 Owners: mcepl Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 13:48:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:48:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181348.n5IDm8ZQ031504@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 --- Comment #4 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-18 09:48:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Should: > 1) I don't think forcefully keeping timestamp of upstream file in which you > already deleted one line is a good idea. > I will suggest you only use > sed -i -e "s|#!/usr/bin/env python||" urllib2_kerberos.py > > and let new timestamp be installed. You are right, of course. > APPROVED. Thanks a lot. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181405.n5IE5dKI004463@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 --- Comment #2 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-06-18 10:05:39 EDT --- bugs repaired Spec URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/autodafe/autodafe.spec SRPM URL: http://www.benhur.prf.cuni.cz/medved-7/wydobitki/fedora/autodafe/autodafe-0.1-2.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:15:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:15:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181415.n5IEFB8b007016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #7 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-18 10:15:10 EDT --- python-ZConfig has been imported but not built yet; that was blocked on the zope-testing / zope-filesystem conflict, which has been fixed. I'll build it now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181416.n5IEGC7a028685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #8 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-18 10:16:12 EDT --- The other dependencies are in Fedora and built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181433.n5IEXdNg000998@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 10:33:37 EDT --- mingw32-boost-1.37.0-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-boost-1.37.0-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:41:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:41:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181441.n5IEfCWw003803@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-18 10:41:11 EDT --- Builds fine in mock. rpmlint output: [mclasen at planemask ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm rtkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.RealtimeKit1.conf 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181446.n5IEkQvu016298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-18 10:46:24 EDT --- IMO, and all that. The code says it's GPLv2+, so, there shouldn't be any blocker license-wise. The author is trying to place additional restrictions on copies downloaded from his site, which is questionable, but shouldn't be relevant here as the software will be distributed by the fedoraproject (or other downstream projects). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 14:51:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 10:51:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181451.n5IEp8de017997@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #1 from Denys Vlasenko 2009-06-18 10:51:06 EDT --- The goal of this package is to be able to compile stuff against uclibc, without too much PITA. After build of this package, headers and libs seem to end up in /usr/{lib,include}/uClibc. Ok. How we will use them to build apps? This is what I do at home to achieve it: http://busybox.net/~vda/HOWTO/i486-linux-uclibc/HOWTO.txt And here is Rob's automatic build system for uclibc toolchain for several architectures: http://landley.net/code/firmware/ My approach (described at the URL above) basically amounts to building a separate cross-compiler for uclibc because: (1) AFAIK, libc forms a part of the platform's ABI: # i486-linux-uclibc-gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-uclibc ^^^^^^ $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/3.4.6/specs ^^^ (above: "gnu" basically means "glibc", I think) and (2) it is easier to follow the same scheme for all uclibc builds, "native" and true cross-compiling ones. But - this method will install cross-compiling gcc and cross-compiling binutils. Not sure Fedora would want that. (Comments from the people in the know? Is it possible/acceptable for Fedora to package cross-compiling toolchains?) I expect Fedora would rather want to use native toolchain, just coerced into using uclibc headers and libs. This is an understandable desire to reuse what we already have installed. But this is not easy. At least I failed when I tried. Problems usually manifest as gcc and/or ld using start files and/or libs which do not exist, and do not contain some required symbols. Because native gcc/ld expect to link against glibc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:13:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:13:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181513.n5IFDWPW027386@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #13 from Patrick Laughton 2009-06-18 11:13:31 EDT --- I'm waiting on this to test OSM data, myself. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:16:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:16:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181516.n5IFGIM6028382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from David Nalley 2009-06-18 11:16:17 EDT --- OK MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint mediawiki-CategoryTree.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [ke4qqq at localhost SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc11.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines . OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. . OK MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . Multiple source files call the gplv2+ out by name. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. OK MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use md5sum for this task. If no upstream URL can be specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with this. [ke4qqq at localhost SOURCES]$ md5sum CategoryTree-MW1.14-r45462.tar.gz* 743a506146c744a36807e2adde11afd6 CategoryTree-MW1.14-r45462.tar.gz 743a506146c744a36807e2adde11afd6 CategoryTree-MW1.14-r45462.tar.gz.1 OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. NA MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. OK MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. NA MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. NA MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. NA MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. NA MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). OK MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. NA MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. NA MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. NA MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). NA MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. NA MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} NA MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. NA MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. OK MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181518.n5IFIKPj016597@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181518.n5IFI45c016481@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #19 from Joseph Smidt 2009-06-18 11:18:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: healpy Short Description: A python wrapper of the healpix library Owners: jsmidt Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181522.n5IFM4Mo017927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #24 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-18 11:21:58 EDT --- 2 questions, the second one depends on the first's answer. First one: Is the package orphaned? Second: Can I adopt it? Disclaimer: I'm not a packager yet, and I have much to learn. Here's the SPEC I made: http://proyectofedora.org/mexico/gnome-do-plugins.spec (Based on previous specs) It compiled gnome-do-plugins, and 14 other RPMs. I installed gnome-do-plugins, and it contained most plugins. The Plugin list: Alias Banshee Epiphany Evolution Eye of Gnome Files and Folders Firefox Gnome Dictionary Gnome Screenshot Gnome SessionManagement Gnome Terminal Google Calculator Google Calendar Google Contacts Google Docs ImageShack Launchpad Locate Files Microblogging (Twitter) OpenSearch Web Search Pastebin Pidgin Rhythmbox TinyUrl Tomboy VinagreVNC VolumeControl WindowManager However, it did not install: Bibtex Clawsmail Flickr Tasque Thunderbird. I'll run some more tests. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] New: Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 Summary: Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chess at chessgriffin.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux.spec SRPM URL: http://www.chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux-0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: tmux is a "terminal multiplexer." It enables a number of terminals (or windows) to be accessed and controlled from a single terminal. tmux is intended to be a simple, modern, BSD-licensed alternative to programs such as GNU Screen. This is my first package and I am seeking a sponsor. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:25:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:25:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181525.n5IFP7iB030938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #1 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-18 11:25:06 EDT --- I should mention this this passes rpmlint, builds in i386 and x86_64 mock chroots, and also passed a scratch build in koji. Thanks in advance. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:29:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:29:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181529.n5IFTNsR019967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Assmann 2009-06-18 11:29:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348501) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348501) gcc-uClibc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:28:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:28:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181528.n5IFSMTO031584@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #2 from Stefan Assmann 2009-06-18 11:28:21 EDT --- Hi Denys, I packaged uClibc on openSUSE back in the days when I still worked at SUSE. My primary concern was to use uClibc to build static binaries of busybox and some other essentials that I needed to create a really small boot environment. Installing a cross-toolchain was not an option back then, I was told so. So I started by reading the mailing list about uClibc and compiling with native gcc. In the end I came up with a little script that uses gcc supplied with openSUSE and overrides all kinds of default paths to use uClibc headers and stuff. That worked to the extend that I could compile busybox statically. I failed to get shared library support working but that wasn't my main focus. Let me attach the script so you can have a look at it. I'd be happy to get some feedback, knowing this won't be your prefered way of dealing with this ;-) This will need some tweaking for using it in Fedora of course, it's just meant to get an idea. Thanks! Stefan -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:31:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:31:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181531.n5IFVj34032569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #4 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-18 11:31:44 EDT --- Is there a particular reason we want to ship uClibc other than 'it's there'? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:37:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:37:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225978] Merge Review: kudzu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181537.n5IFbZRw001656@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225978 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-18 11:37:32 EDT --- Tagged, built. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:35:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:35:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181535.n5IFZfCY022479@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #45 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-18 11:35:37 EDT --- Lubomir: How about: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Valmantas: I added the Provides as suggested. I'll try to remove all bluetooth references from Fedora, then try to install that package as the only bluetooth one. As soon as I finish and complete the test, I'll submit the package again. Sorry for taking so long, but I don't intend on abandoning my first rpm :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 15:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181543.n5IFhLJm003499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet 2009-06-18 11:43:20 EDT --- #1 done #2 done #3 done #5 done #6 done (create a circular dependency, but as this is from a single .spec, that seems ok) #7 because only RPM 4.7 (available in F >= 11) handle noarch subpackage. #4 as upstream prefers to keep the words "diagram" and "element", I keep summnary and description (taken from desktop and README). This solution allow me to provides more language than I could if I a rephrase (I'm only English/French speaking) and this could be improved by upstream later. #8 : Spec URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/qelectrotech.spec SRPM URL: http://remi.fedorapeople.org/qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc1.fc8.src.rpm * Thu Jun 18 2009 Remi Collet - 0.20-0.2.rc1 - add multi-lang sumnary (taken from .desktop) - add multi-lang description (taken from README) - rename qlectrotech-elements to -symbols - use electronics-menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:11:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:11:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181611.n5IGBhXs011590@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-18 12:11:42 EDT --- OK, seems to build fine on koji, so you are APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181613.n5IGDKAc012038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #2 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-18 12:13:19 EDT --- package name: ok spec file name: ok [...to be continued...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:04:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:04:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181604.n5IG4VeZ029954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #25 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-18 12:04:29 EDT --- I apologize for my ignorance (I hadn't used Gnome-do 0.8 before) It lists all available plugins, but when you try to enable them, they don't work because the package isn't there, which means everything's working fine with my spec so far. I tried doing a mock, and it failed. For those interested, here's the mock: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1423062 >From what I can tell, its Flickr's fault, but I'll keep looking into it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181622.n5IGMPCB002660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #12 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-18 12:22:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > under the apl 2.0 - mod_admserv and mod_restartd - these must use the apl > because they use apl code - how should I denote this? > - fixed _initrddir Please add GPLv2+ and ASL 2.0 as license tag > There is a "bug" or perhaps it is a feature of rpm that it does not preserve > the ownership/permissions of files/directories marked config noreplace. These > are files and directories which users are accustomed to changing. If we do not > explicitly save and preserve the owner/permission in pre/post, upgrade will > break existing installations. I know it is somewhat of a hack, but this is the > only way I could get it to work. Suggestions are welcome. It may be nice to open a bug agains rpm to get an 'official' statement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:23:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:23:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181623.n5IGNFjk014565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |yaneti at declera.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |yaneti at declera.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-18 12:23:14 EDT --- This time I looked through the source files and they all have the "or (at your option) any later version" variety, which in my understanding makes the package LGPLv2+ . URL: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ccss/ or URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~robsta/libccss/ BuildRequires: gtk-doc is not really necessary, the tarball has the docs already built. The last paragraph of the description seems out of place (everything after the bullet points) . Perhaps just remove it. You could add --disable-examples to spare few cycles. There is a TODO file that looks to be maintained. You could %{_includedir}/libccss-1 and be done with it. If the package is not split on cairo/gtk etc. there is hardly a point in listing everything. Other than the license, all minor concerns. I believe you'll fix that prior to import. APPROVED. Again as with rest some head scratching on weather it should be called libccss or ccss , but I like the idea of sticking with the tarball name best. And its just a library. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:27:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:27:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181627.n5IGRehm004130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-18 12:27:39 EDT --- packaging guidelines: should follow https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups for adding users/groups - add a home dir, maybe - not sure the getent foo is really essential, but you need to make sure that %pre does exit with 0 even if the user/group are already there license: ok license field: ok, not sure if you need to add BSD there for the included sources, probably yes, with a comment explaining what it applies to, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines license file: ok spec language: ok spec legible: yes upstream sources: please put the tarball where the source url says buildable: ok excludearch: ok build deps: ok locale handling: n/a shared libs: n/a relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok [...to be continued...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] New: Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Summary: Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mux.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mux-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Mux: Moblin User eXperience. Gtk+ widgets for the Moblin UX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:33:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:33:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181633.n5IGX3rk017144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #14 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 12:33:01 EDT --- 11 package build is up: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity.spec http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity-11-1.aw_fc12.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:36:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:36:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181636.n5IGaERA006470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-18 12:36:13 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-console Short Description: A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server. Owners: rmeggins nkinder nhosoi Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476527] Review Request: python-zdaemon - Python Daemon Process Control Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181646.n5IGk1B2020413@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476527 --- Comment #9 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-18 12:46:01 EDT --- python-ZConfig is built; everything should be ready. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:45:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:45:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476600] Review Request: python-ZODB3 - Zope Object Database: Object Database and Persistence In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181645.n5IGjnbN020379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476600 Bug 476600 depends on bug 476528, which changed state. Bug 476528 Summary: Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:45:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:45:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476528] Review Request: python-ZConfig - Structured Configuration Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181645.n5IGjmBX020355@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476528 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-18 12:45:47 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=106948 Built in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181648.n5IGmker020841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #4 from Lennart Poettering 2009-06-18 12:48:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > [mclasen at planemask ~]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm > rtkit.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc > /etc/dbus-1/system.d/org.freedesktop.RealtimeKit1.conf > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Although this is placed in /etc the stuff in /etc/dbus-1/system.d isn't really config files. In fact I would argue that all this stuff should be moved to /usr/share in some way. But that's another story. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:57:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:57:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181657.n5IGv7Wk011564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #5 from Lennart Poettering 2009-06-18 12:57:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > packaging guidelines: should follow > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:UsersAndGroups for adding > users/groups > - add a home dir, maybe > - not sure the getent foo is really essential, but you need to make sure that > %pre does exit with 0 even if the user/group are already there We use /proc as homedir (i.e. -c /proc). This is the only thing that remotely makes sense, given that rtkit chroot()s into /proc after starting up. The code in the spec file does almost exactly what the user/groups documentation you linked suggests, except that we use groupadd -f instead of the seperate getent check when creating the group, and for the user we check the availability with 'id' insted of getent. I have however added a final "exit 0" now. > license: ok > license field: ok, not sure if you need to add BSD there for the included > sources, probably yes, with a comment explaining what it applies to, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines Fixed. > license file: ok > spec language: ok > spec legible: yes > upstream sources: please put the tarball where the source url says Done. > buildable: ok > excludearch: ok > build deps: ok > locale handling: n/a > shared libs: n/a > relocatable: n/a > directory ownership: ok > > [...to be continued...] I have now updated the spec file in-place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 16:59:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:59:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181659.n5IGxPKe011862@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #15 from leigh scott 2009-06-18 12:59:23 EDT --- You need to validate the desktop file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files add this to the end of the %install section and add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181702.n5IH2UgQ013003@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #13 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-18 13:02:29 EDT --- new SRPM: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-1.1.7-5.src.rpm new Spec: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin.spec new license tag: License: GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 This is according to the guidelines at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/FAQ > It may be nice to open a bug agains rpm to get an 'official' statement. http://rpm.org/ticket/71 But I don't see any other way to fix or work around the problem for now, so I would like to add the package as is, and fix it if/when rpm does. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:09:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:09:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181709.n5IH9JsF014616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pbrobinson at gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 13:09:18 EDT --- > This time I looked through the source files and they all have the "or (at your > option) any later version" variety, which in my understanding makes the package > LGPLv2+ . Updated in my local ver > URL: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/ccss/ > or > URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~robsta/libccss/ Have used the later for the moment. It seems from comments that it will eventually be all on freedesktop.org so will update it as it channges > BuildRequires: gtk-doc > is not really necessary, the tarball has the docs already built. > > The last paragraph of the description seems out of place (everything after the > bullet points) . Perhaps just remove it. > > You could add --disable-examples to spare few cycles. > > There is a TODO file that looks to be maintained. Done > You could > %{_includedir}/libccss-1 > and be done with it. If the package is not split on cairo/gtk etc. there is > hardly a point in listing everything. I've done it that way mainly so I see if there's any changes by a broken build :-) > Other than the license, all minor concerns. I believe you'll fix that prior to > import. APPROVED. Thanks! > Again as with rest some head scratching on weather it should be called libccss > or ccss , but I like the idea of sticking with the tarball name best. And its > just a library. So did I but I figured that as the tarball was libccss I would use that to follow conventions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181710.n5IHAj77026370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 13:10:44 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libccss Short Description: A simple api for CSS Stylesheets Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:12:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:12:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181712.n5IHCRrJ015655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:11:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:11:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181711.n5IHBt06015503@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #16 from leigh scott 2009-06-18 13:11:54 EDT --- You need to validate the desktop file. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files add this to the end of the %install section and add BuildRequires: desktop-file-utils desktop-file-validate %{buildroot}/%{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:13:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:13:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181713.n5IHDXDq015797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-06-18 13:13:32 EDT --- Sorry for the lag. Also, apologies for the copy/paste of the spec from the failed review. I should have put some time into it as all of the changes are obvious. SPEC URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/blueproximity-1.2.5-3.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 486390] Review Request: simspark - Spark physical simulation system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181717.n5IHHQJV028371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=486390 Bug 486390 depends on bug 490975, which changed state. Bug 490975 Summary: incorrect order on removal for directories https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490975 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:20:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:20:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181720.n5IHK8BH029375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #14 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 13:20:07 EDT --- I just added a BuildRequires: cvs , built it in mock, and it worked fine. Updated package coming in a minute. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181719.n5IHJ0T6028877@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #17 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 13:18:59 EDT --- oh, yeah, sorry, forgot about that. coming... -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:22:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:22:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181722.n5IHM9SG029792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #18 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 13:22:08 EDT --- here: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity.spec http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity-11-2.aw_fc12.src.rpm -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:23:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:23:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181723.n5IHN1Rs018691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #14 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-18 13:22:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > new license tag: > License: GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 Thats is not ok, the file libs/base/nscputil.cpp contains a GPLv2+ license header: * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 * of the License, or (at your option) any later version. * > http://rpm.org/ticket/71 > > But I don't see any other way to fix or work around the problem for now, so I > would like to add the package as is, and fix it if/when rpm does. Thats ok, I didn't take a look into the ticket, but my idention was to make sure, that the rpm developers may notified about this issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475852] Review Request: gnustep-base - GNUstep Base library package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181728.n5IHSq6g020420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475852 --- Comment #28 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-18 13:28:49 EDT --- Ping Michel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:32:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:32:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181732.n5IHWIjL000401@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-18 13:32:17 EDT --- Ok, restarting with the things that got fixed: packaging guidelines: ok now license field: ok upstream sources: ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181741.n5IHfn00023729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-18 13:41:48 EDT --- Would you post the URLs of your latest spec/srpm? Note that please change the release number of your spec/srpm every time you modify your spec file to avoid confusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:58:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:58:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181758.n5IHwSj4027652@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506804 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 17:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 13:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] New: Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Summary: Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506721 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anerley.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anerley-0.0.9-1.fc11.src.rpm Moblin widgets for people information -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181801.n5II1ThL008472@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #15 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-18 14:01:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > > new license tag: > > License: GPLv2 and ASL 2.0 > > Thats is not ok, the file libs/base/nscputil.cpp contains a GPLv2+ license > header: hmm - check the file again - did you download the latest source tarball? md5sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 1844088cbe44bc9eda371ce606a38405 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 e6f9beea076220f485aa93c990935dd0134a18da 389-admin-1.1.7.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:07:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:07:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181807.n5II7YMl030383@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #15 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 14:07:32 EDT --- Here's a new build with the CVS buildrequire added, and a patch to build the plugins properly (not versioned). Upstream has adopted a version of the plugin build patch. Also, an upstream dev is currently working on the crash I've seen in current SVN, so we may be able to package SVN instead soon. http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.0-3.aw_fc12.src.rpm http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit.spec -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:11:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:11:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181811.n5IIBNEd031737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Chris Feist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|cfeist at redhat.com |nobody at redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Chris Feist 2009-06-18 14:11:19 EDT --- Pulling myself of the assigned list, it appears as though this can be closed as this package is in fc11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:15:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:15:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181815.n5IIFxW0000443@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-18 14:15:57 EDT --- ping, are there any remaining review blockers? did I miss anything? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:20:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:20:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181820.n5IIKAUs013262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-06-18 14:20:09 EDT --- duplicate files: ok permissions: ok, although I'm sure that somebody will re-review and complain that you didn't follow the packaging guideline to the letter... %clean: ok macro use: ok permissible content: ok large docs: n/a %doc content: ok headers: n/a static libs: n/a shared libs: n/a pc files: n/a devel deps: n/a libtool archives: n/a gui: n/a directory ownership: ok utf8 filenames: ok Looking all good now, approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:20:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:20:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181820.n5IIKTlN001885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181821.n5IILPUh002226@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-06-18 14:21:24 EDT --- I don't think installing class directly under /usr/share/php is a good idea (if lot of package does this, we are going to create a lot of conflicts) Should use sed rather than ed sed -i -e ... I think a better solution is to install in /usr/share/php/PHPMailer and Set PluginDir in class (quite strange than SetLanguage doesn't use it) Tagging lang file seems usefull, something like # Lang for i in %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/path/to/language/*.php do lang=$(basename $i) echo "%lang(${lang:15:2}) %{_datadir}/path/to/language/${lang}" done >%{name}.lang And %file -f %{name}.lang -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:27:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181827.n5IIRqTm003671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #26 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-18 14:27:50 EDT --- There seems to be a bug compiling for x86_64, as I managed to compile it fine excluding that arch and using x86. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1423278 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181827.n5IIRscj003731@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 --- Comment #18 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-18 14:27:52 EDT --- Chris: Can you address the items in comment #13? We should not close this while there are still outstanding issues to address. It doesn't matter if the package is "already in", it needs to meet guidelines... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:30:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:30:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181830.n5IIUbc1015781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Lennart Poettering 2009-06-18 14:30:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rtkit Short Description: Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon Owners: lennart Branches: devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 18:32:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181832.n5IIWtRS005025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 Chris Feist changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at redhat.com |rmccabe at redhat.com --- Comment #19 from Chris Feist 2009-06-18 14:32:54 EDT --- I'm re-assigning this to rmccabe to fix the issues in comment #13. I believe he does all the package builds and can fix these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:10:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:10:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181910.n5IJAZxY013520@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #16 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-18 15:10:33 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > hmm - check the file again - did you download the latest source tarball? If you have made changes on the original tarball please increase the version number and create a new source RPM. This may be helpful for audit the authentification of the package source file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] New: Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Summary: Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Bickley is a meta data management API and framework. The core API allows storing and querying of URIs and associating key/value pairs. The core bickley API in the libbickley library provides shared access to common meta-data storage. Different processes can access and manipulate the same set of URIs and meta data about them in parallel. ------------- A couple of notes. It doesn't currently compile on PPC so its currently ExclusiveArch http://bugzilla.moblin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3643 It doesn't currently compile on rawhide due to the breakage in clutter* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1423368 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:34:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181934.n5IJYYUj029839@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 --- Comment #17 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-18 15:34:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > hmm - check the file again - did you download the latest source tarball? > > If you have made changes on the original tarball please increase the version > number and create a new source RPM. This may be helpful for audit the > authentification of the package source file. new SRPM: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin-1.1.8-1.src.rpm new Spec: http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/pkgreview/389-admin.spec new Source URL: http://port389.org/sources/389-admin-1.1.8.tar.bz2 md5sum 389-admin-1.1.8.tar.bz2 6d9ba5141022e10696dc92f296ae5ed3 389-admin-1.1.8.tar.bz2 sha1sum 389-admin-1.1.8.tar.bz2 cc0a718f0725a261b9ea6687ca98a0d5d75c82c3 389-admin-1.1.8.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181958.n5IJwPJP024059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506833 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:58:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:58:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181958.n5IJwO1x024033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506833 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:58:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:58:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181958.n5IJwQpY024081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506833 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:58:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:58:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] New: Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Summary: Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506476,506486,506780 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bisho-0.10.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Moblin web services settings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 19:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:58:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906181958.n5IJw2Jc023945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #19 from leigh scott 2009-06-18 15:58:01 EDT --- * source files match upstream: OK. b41601c3a13d889422b707f854b7a23b652a48b8 congruity-11.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. OK * license is open source-compatible. OK. * license text included in package. OK. * latest version is being packaged. OK. * BuildRequires are proper . OK. * %clean is present. OK. * Desktop file is properly installed with desktop-file-install. OK. * package builds in Koji dist-f11 OK. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1423291 * package installs and uninstalls properly. OK. * rpmlint is silent. OK. rpmlint -vi congruity-11-2.fc11.src.rpm congruity.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings rpmlint -vi congruity-11-2.fc11.noarch.rpm congruity.noarch: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * final provides and requires are sane: congruity = 11-1.fc11 /bin/sh /bin/sh /usr/bin/env libconcord-python >= 0.20 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 wxPython >= 2.8 * owns the directories it creates. OK. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK. * no duplicates in %files. OK. * %check is not present; no test suite. I installed and ran the program, but I have neither the necessary remote nor a programming file for it. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * file permissions are appropriate. OK * scriptlets present and correct. OK Note: The License includes this, I'm not sure if you need to add it the License tag Licensing for remote.png: CC-BY-SA-2.5 Downloaded from the URL below, resized, and made transparent: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Harmony670.jpg Recommend: You have set the file permissions, this isn't needed. %defattr(0644,root,root,0755) %doc Changelog COPYING LICENSE.txt README.txt %attr(0755, root, root) %{_bindir}/* should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changelog COPYING LICENSE.txt README.txt %{_bindir}/* I have tested this rpm -qav --list congruity -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 61266 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/bin/congruity -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 117 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/applications/congruity.desktop drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/congruity -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2192 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/congruity/icon-complete.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1960 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/congruity/icon-failed.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1956 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/congruity/icon-in-progress.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1400 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/congruity/icon-unstarted.png -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 136801 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/congruity/remote.png drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/doc/congruity-11 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 35147 Jun 18 04:54 /usr/share/doc/congruity-11/COPYING -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5840 Jun 18 04:54 /usr/share/doc/congruity-11/Changelog -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1281 Jun 18 04:54 /usr/share/doc/congruity-11/LICENSE.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 5840 Jun 18 04:54 /usr/share/doc/congruity-11/README.txt -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 623 Jun 18 20:33 /usr/share/man/man1/congruity.1.gz ***Package Approved*** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:13:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:13:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182013.n5IKDA3b027544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:13:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:18:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:18:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182018.n5IKI4G1028616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:18:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:16:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:16:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182016.n5IKGuFn028467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:16:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:15:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:15:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505138] Review Request: trac-peerreview-plugin - Framework for realtime code review within Trac In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182015.n5IKFlOb028206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505138 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:15:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506680] Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182018.n5IKIKUC008075@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:18:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:24:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:24:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182024.n5IKOcm2030218@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506678] Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182022.n5IKMulE029876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:22:54 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:23:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:23:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182023.n5IKNK2a029952@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:23:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:24:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:24:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182024.n5IKOCw8030117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #5 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-18 16:24:11 EDT --- #MUST There are two typos * acknowledgment => acknowledgEment * sumnary => sumMary #Tip The changelog will be published on my websites. Some of them don't have spam protection. eg. Fedora [AT] FamilleCollet DOT com ################## - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name} - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package is licensed (GPL) with an open-source compatible license and meet other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. - MUST: the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. - MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - MUST: The spec file for the package is be legible. - MUST: The sources used to build the package must matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least i386. - MUST: All build dependencies is listed in BuildRequires. - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly. - MUST: If the package does not contain shared library files located in the dynamic linker's default paths - MUST: the package is not designed to be relocatable - MUST: the package owns all directories that it creates. - MUST: the package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. - MUST: There are no Large documentation files - MUST: %doc does not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. - MUST: There are no Header files or static libraries - MUST: The package does not contain library files with a suffix - MUST: Package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives - MUST: Package containing GUI applications includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. - MUST: Package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. SHOULD Items: - SHOULD: The source package does include license text(s) as LICENSE - SHOULD: mock builds succcessfully in i386. - SHOULD: The reviewer tested that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. - SHOULD: No scriptlets were used, those scriptlets must be sane. - SHOULD: No subpackages present. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:25:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:25:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182025.n5IKPSkC009736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:25:27 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:29:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:29:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182029.n5IKT2I0031285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #2 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-18 16:29:01 EDT --- #1: remove requires qt3 yum automatically deduces the dependencies in more cases. You can verify it with $ rpm -qR qtdmm .... libqt-mt.so.3 .... $ yum whatprovides libqt-mt.so.3 #2: package name should be QtDMM instead of qtdmm. It should be the same as what upstream uses, unless it is a trac/eclipse plugin #3: Add this --vendor="" after desktop-file-install \ This will ensure that for the EL-5 branch, the build does not fail -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:29:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182029.n5IKTi3s010349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:29:43 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182029.n5IKT1Q5010236@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:29:00 EDT --- I used a "short description" that's actually short. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:30:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:30:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182030.n5IKUlhE032071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:30:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:30:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:30:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182030.n5IKUKfq031838@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-18 16:30:19 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:29:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182029.n5IKTw9X031427@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #20 from leigh scott 2009-06-18 16:29:57 EDT --- I have just noticed this in the build log. + unset DISPLAY + make all Nothing to build, run 'make install' as root + exit 0 make all should be removed from the %build section I believe this can be ignored + exit 0 /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found /usr/lib/rpm/pythondeps.sh: line 8: python: command not found Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh as it doesn't seem to apply http://osdir.com/ml/fedora-devel-list/2009-02/msg01589.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182047.n5IKlC9g002905@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #16 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 16:47:09 EDT --- With the kind assistance of Martin Schaller from upstream, we've tracked the problem with current SVN down to a problem in freetype. It works if you rebuild freetype with -fno-strict-aliasing . I'll take this up with the freetype maintainer...once we get that solved, we ought to be able to do a package for current SVN instead of the old 0.1.0. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:51:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:51:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504077] Review Request: gnusim8085 - Intel 8085 assembly language simulator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182051.n5IKpwmm015260@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504077 Chitlesh GOORAH changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:49:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182049.n5IKn7HZ014457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #1 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-18 16:49:06 EDT --- #undef HAVE_IO_PRIO #if defined (__i386__) # define HAVE_IO_PRIO # define __NR_ioprio_set 289 #elif defined (__x86_64__) # define HAVE_IO_PRIO # define __NR_ioprio_set 251 #else # warn "Architecture does not support ioprio modification" #endif Change that to a "#warning" instead of "#warn" and you should be ready to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182048.n5IKmkb3014400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pmatilai at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Panu Matilainen 2009-06-18 16:48:45 EDT --- Doesn't really fly: [root at turre rpm]# rpm -Uvh /home/pmatilai/rpmbuild/RPMS/xz-4.999.8-0.3beta.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/pmatilai/rpmbuild/RPMS/xz-libs-4.999.8-0.3beta.fc11.x86_64.rpm /home/pmatilai/rpmbuild/RPMS/xz-devel-4.999.8-0.3beta.fc11.x86_64.rpm error: Failed dependencies: lzma is needed by (installed) man-1.6f-20.fc11.x86_64 lzma is needed by (installed) rpm-build-4.7.0.git9198-1.fc11.lorg.x86_64 liblzmadec.so.0()(64bit) is needed by (installed) libarchive-2.6.2-1.fc11.x86_64 How about we simply leave out the lzma bits from the xz package? Ie dont obsolete or conflict with anything, and only include the actual xz binaries in the main package: /usr/bin/unxz /usr/bin/xz /usr/bin/xzcat /usr/bin/xzdec -libs and -devel are not a problem as they dont conflict and those are the only bits that rpm really needs for payload compression, /usr/bin/xz is only useful for supporting xz compressed sources in build, the old stable lzma can be used to provide the /usr/bin/*lz* bits for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 20:57:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:57:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506185] Review Request: bespin - A theme for Qt/KDE4 (includes KWin, Qt, and a plasmoid) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182057.n5IKvYt8016505@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506185 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-18 16:57:32 EDT --- Packages built in Koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:02:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:02:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485652] Review Request: navit - Car navigation system with routing engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182102.n5IL2RjK017597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485652 --- Comment #17 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 17:02:25 EDT --- my latest SVN .src.rpm is up at http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/navit/navit-0.1.1-0.1.2347.aw_fc12.src.rpm , btw. If you rebuild freetype with -fno-strict-aliasing, you can even use it. :) -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501381] Review Request: 389-console - A Java based remote management console used for managing 389 Administration Server and 389 Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182112.n5ILC5IN019823@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501381 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-18 17:12:04 EDT --- cvs import done - koji builds in rawhide - all branches committed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:14:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:14:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182114.n5ILEjdq009026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Roland Wolters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:10:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:10:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182110.n5ILADdC008279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #21 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 17:10:12 EDT --- yeah, it shouldn't be needed for this package, I don't think. I'll take out the make all. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wolters.liste at gmx.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex-1.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex-0.71b3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: audex is a new audio grabber tool for CD-ROM drives based on KDE 4. Although it is still under development, it is published as a beta version. It is being tested by some testers and this program may change on the way to its first stable 1.0-release. What I've tested so far: $ rpmlint audex-0.71b3-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint audex-debuginfo-0.71b3-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint audex-0.71b3-1.fc10.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Thins I'm not 100% certain about with this package: - Handling of icons is done according to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets Still, I'm not 100% sure if everything is perfect. - The program is Beta, but the current version will be released as final if no new bugs come up (the developer told me, I know him personally). Should I wait for final or should we launch this version, if the spec is all right? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182119.n5ILJeKx021316@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #22 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 17:19:39 EDT --- spec and srpm updated: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity.spec http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/congruity/congruity-11-4.aw_fc12.src.rpm to address all above points. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:22:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:22:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182122.n5ILM1ms011026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 Adam Williamson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-18 17:22:00 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: congruity Short Description: Application to program Logitech Harmony universal remote controls Owners: adamwill Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: s-t-rhbugzilla at wwwdotorg.org -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:22:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:22:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] New: Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Summary: Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bognor-regis.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bognor-regis-0.4.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Media daemon and play queue manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:40:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:40:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182140.n5ILewWC015333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 17:40:57 EDT --- Thanks Bastien! Compiles now on PPC :-) SPEC as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bickley-0.2.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 21:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 17:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182147.n5ILlB8w027672@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-18 17:47:10 EDT --- The spec and the SRPM are here. http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle-0.11-2.fc11.src.rpm http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182207.n5IM7hP8021040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182216.n5IMGouc001301@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #1 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-18 18:16:49 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [--] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [--] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:18:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:18:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182218.n5IMI2ST023193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #2 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-18 18:18:02 EDT --- You should not do %{_kde4_datadir}/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/audex.mo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182221.n5IMLCmt024055@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 18:21:11 EDT --- built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:20:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182220.n5IMKs50023898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 18:20:53 EDT --- built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:20:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182220.n5IMKXEN023830@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-18 18:20:32 EDT --- Build in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:33:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:33:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182233.n5IMXbSo026091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182233.n5IMXd5g026132@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182233.n5IMXcIk026113@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |506855 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:33:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:33:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182233.n5IMXHOK026005@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-18 18:33:16 EDT --- Thanks, Parag. Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage Short Description: Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 22:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] New: Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Summary: Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506721,506825,506848 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/hornsey.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/hornsey-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Hornsey is the Moblin media player -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 23:12:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:12:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182312.n5INCUc2011987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 19:12:29 EDT --- healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 23:17:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:17:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182317.n5INHFSl012916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #6 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-18 19:17:14 EDT --- You did commit with URL: http://www.gnome.org/~ebassi/source/ which isn't for this particular lib... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 23:31:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:31:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182331.n5INVgMk004656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-18 19:31:41 EDT --- healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 18 23:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468226] Review Request: python-tw-jquery - ToscaWidgets wrapping for jQuery In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906182337.n5INbB5O016410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468226 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(jkeating at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2009-06-18 19:37:10 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery.spec http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tw-jquery-0.9.4.5-1.el5.src.rpm * Thu Jun 18 2009 Luke Macken - 0.9.4.5-1 - Latest upstream release, with various module cleanups -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 01:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 21:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 446991] Review Request: python-coherence - Python framework to participate in digital living networks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190146.n5J1kXZP028685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446991 Mauricio Teixeira changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Mauricio Teixeira 2009-06-18 21:46:31 EDT --- Package is being updated during F11 lifecycle. This is not needed anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 02:15:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:15:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190215.n5J2FdOd002367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #3 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-18 22:15:38 EDT --- Ad the Spec file ame should just be audex.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 02:42:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:42:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190242.n5J2gIj4018898@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #24 from Stephen Warren 2009-06-18 22:42:17 EDT --- congruity-12 released; should fix missing .desktop file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 03:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190326.n5J3QOvF027543@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-18 23:26:23 EDT --- Small suggestion, just use Summary: Audio ripper mentioning kde or even kde4 there adds little value -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 03:48:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 23:48:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190348.n5J3mFUF020311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #15 from Sean Middleditch 2009-06-18 23:48:13 EDT --- Alright, I added a bit to force AUTHORS into valid UTF8. I also made sure the tarball is directly from upstream and that building still works. I also made the GConf schema file %config(noreplace) as rpmlint complained about that as well now. Updated files: http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud.spec http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud-0.11.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 04:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190441.n5J4fIdK007939@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 --- Comment #25 from Adam Williamson 2009-06-19 00:41:17 EDT --- spec and .src.rpm updated in the same directory, for anyone interested. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 04:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190458.n5J4whNd000381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet 2009-06-19 00:58:42 EDT --- Thanks for the review New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: qelectrotech Short Description: An electric diagrams editor Owners: remi Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 05:39:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:39:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190539.n5J5dFZg018195@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at famillecollet.com --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet 2009-06-19 01:39:13 EDT --- I really regret the use of /usr/share/php php-smpphp install in /usr/share/php/xmpphp php-oauth install in /usr/share/php/oauth ... I think we need a Guidelines about /usr/share/php usage. + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 05:44:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:44:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190544.n5J5iWXJ019103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #17 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-06-19 01:44:31 EDT --- Added mcu8051ide to FC-10, FC-11 and EL-5. Check attached log. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 05:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:45:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190545.n5J5jevE008604@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #18 from Shakthi Kannan 2009-06-19 01:45:39 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348604) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348604) mcu8051 cvs commit log -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:24:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:24:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190624.n5J6OfqR026586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #5 from Ivana Varekova 2009-06-19 02:24:40 EDT --- The reason is to have it separated from busybox - for now busybox use it to be smaller and more optimized. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:36:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:36:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin for CGI::Application provides easy ways to setup run modes. You can just write the method that implement a run mode, you do not have to explicitly register it with CGI::App anymore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:41:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:41:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190641.n5J6f4W5018886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-19 02:41:03 EDT --- Sorry, lost in the 100s of spec changes I was dealing with yesterday. Its now committed to cvs so I won't miss it. It will appear the next time I push the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:45:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:45:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190645.n5J6jOdc030734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 06:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 02:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190656.n5J6uUuH000314@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-19 02:56:29 EDT --- -URL: http://www.gnome.org/~ebassi/source/ +URL: http://live.gnome.org/TwitterGlib Sorry, but for libccss this isn't the one either ;) I guess you meant http://people.freedesktop.org/~robsta/libccss/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190705.n5J75G10002138@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-19 03:05:15 EDT --- Correct :) and fixed. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:12:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:12:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502795] Review Request: mcu8051ide - IDE for MCS-51 based microcontrollers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190712.n5J7C5kO003448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502795 --- Comment #19 from Chitlesh GOORAH 2009-06-19 03:12:04 EDT --- The commit logs are also sent to cvsextras_ at _fedoraproje_t.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190714.n5J7E9jO025463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 03:14:08 EDT --- Add BR: perl(Test::More) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:13:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:13:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190713.n5J7DNOY003645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 03:13:21 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424382 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 41d4b4587ae59e7b5518a76583172c501aa621ab CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=29, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr 0.02 sys + 0.53 cusr 0.08 csys = 0.68 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DBH) = 4.00 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:20:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:20:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190720.n5J7KdOo005149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 --- Comment #3 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-19 03:20:38 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:29:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:29:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190729.n5J7TuRo006673@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-19 03:29:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Add BR: perl(Test::More) I knew I forgot something when I submitted this package. BR added, package builds in mock fedora-rawhide-i386. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:39:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:39:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506678] Review Request: hunspell-ky - Kirghiz hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190739.n5J7dlc0030946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506678 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 07:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 03:40:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506680] Review Request: hunspell-quh - Quechua, South Bolivia hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190740.n5J7egiI031468@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506680 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 08:28:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:28:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505356] Review Request: php-PHPMailer - PHP email transport class with a lot of features In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190828.n5J8SpJF010202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505356 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-06-19 04:28:50 EDT --- > I don't think installing class directly under /usr/share/php is a good idea I totally agree. But I just follow the packaging guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:PHP#File_Placement -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 08:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190856.n5J8uotD025565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 04:56:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424380 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 45651d7d33f69bbc2a19d674fd6a4f66302f2629 acheck_0.5.1.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package acheck-0.5.1-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(ACheck::Common) perl(ACheck::FileType) perl(ACheck::Parser) Requires: /usr/bin/perl perl(ACheck::Common) perl(ACheck::FileType) perl(ACheck::Parser) perl(Config::General) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(Getopt::Long) perl(IO::File) perl(Term::ANSIColor) perl(Term::ReadLine) perl(Term::Size) perl(constant) perl(locale) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application Should: 1)Requires should be written as only Requires: perl(Text::Aspell), perl-gettext, %{name}-rules APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 08:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:58:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190858.n5J8whCM016366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 04:58:42 EDT --- oops sorry got missed from review tracker list. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:02:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:02:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190902.n5J92mgC026731@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-19 05:02:47 EDT --- Thank you, I owe you for many reviews. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Pod-Abstract Short Description: Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents Owners: mmaslano Branches: F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:09:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:09:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190909.n5J99olc028121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 05:09:49 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424569 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url ee2a03edd1a6d3590cad31db733af9c32dd45d12 CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=8, Tests=71, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.41 cusr 0.05 csys = 0.51 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode) = 0.16 perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::AutoRunmode::FileDelegate) = 0.13 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(strict) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:09:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:09:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190909.n5J99lZI028091@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 05:09:45 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1410391 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 382662ecadff11707e78053f75ea395cc37a4e79 Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse-0.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=7, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 1.61 cusr 0.05 csys = 1.71 CPU) + Package perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse-0.03-2.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Catalyst::Helper::View::PDF::Reuse) perl(Catalyst::View::PDF::Reuse) = 0.03 perl(Template::Plugin::Catalyst::View::PDF::Reuse) Requires: perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(File::chdir) perl(PDF::Reuse) perl(base) perl(parent) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506914] New: Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 Summary: Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://www.antico.netsons.org/ OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ogldelphi at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Antico is a Qt4/X11 Desktop/Window Manager (i.e. KDE+KWin) * The goal is to create a Window/Desktop manager simple and fast. * All parameters must be configured from few files, avoiding unnecessary complications, following the K.I.S.S. philosophy. * The whole project is based only on Qt4 libraries, without any other external dependencies (e.g. kdelibs ?) git: http://github.com/antico/antico/tree/master Keyboard switcher for Antico: git://github.com/disels/axkb.git p.s this is my first package request and if I did something wrong, please do not angry to me. Thanks for you time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:38:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:38:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190938.n5J9cloY002424@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-19 05:38:46 EDT --- Perfect! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190949.n5J9n4HB004389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Jan F. Chadima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review?, fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-06-19 05:49:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: autodafe Short Description: Fuzzing framework Owners: jfch2222 Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 09:51:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 05:51:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906190951.n5J9pxg9027920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:05:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:05:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191005.n5JA5JYk030637@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-19 06:05:18 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424595 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 2238a853a7f37b19160867b77bdb0a2df43449b9 blueproximity-1.2.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + desktop file installed correctly. + GUI App Should: 1) blueproximity.1 is man page file. So it should be installed as man page not just documentation. use following patch -------------------------------------------------------------- --- blueproximity.spec 2009-06-18 22:58:54.000000000 +0530 +++ blueproximity-new.spec 2009-06-19 15:31:42.000000000 +0530 @@ -34,11 +34,13 @@ install -d %{buildroot}%{_bindir} install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/pixmaps/ install -d %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/pixmaps/ +install -d %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ # Install Files install -p -m 0755 start_proximity.sh %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/%{name} install -p -m 0755 proximity.py %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ install -p -m 0644 proximity.glade %{buildroot}%{_datadir}/%{name}/ +install -p -m 0644 doc/blueproximity.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/ # Install Languages for i in $(ls LANG/); do @@ -67,9 +69,10 @@ %files -f %{name}.lang %defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc ChangeLog COPYING README doc/ +%doc ChangeLog COPYING README doc/manual* %{_datadir}/%{name} %{_bindir}/%{name} +%{_mandir}/man1/blueproximity* %{_datadir}/applications/%{name}.desktop %{_datadir}/pixmaps/%{name}_base.svg ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Make sure you fix this thing and then import this package to cvs. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:15:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:15:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506914] Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191015.n5JAFFQa000395@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-19 06:15:14 EDT --- I don't see a spec file or source RPM for review. If you just want to make a request for someone else to package this software, add it to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/WishList. There are no guarantees that someone else will volunteer to maintain the package, however. If you want to actually submit this package yourself and maintain it in Fedora, please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join and follow the instructions there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 10:24:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 06:24:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506914] Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191024.n5JAOHQ5012341@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 --- Comment #2 from RJ 2009-06-19 06:24:16 EDT --- Ok. Thank you. I'll try to adapt the spec file from another rpm distribution and add it here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 11:15:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:15:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191115.n5JBFcoS015349@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #8 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-19 07:15:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > IMO, and all that. > > The code says it's GPLv2+, so, there shouldn't be any blocker license-wise. > > The author is trying to place additional restrictions on copies downloaded from > his site, which is questionable, but shouldn't be relevant here as the software > will be distributed by the fedoraproject (or other downstream projects). You may be right, but the upstream website is so confusing, that I would rather have unequivocal statement of the upstream author on this topic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 11:22:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:22:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191122.n5JBM5jZ026303@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Stepan Kasal 2009-06-19 07:22:04 EDT --- One nit in %description "Simply" -> "Simple" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 11:45:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:45:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191145.n5JBjqKW021981@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #7 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-19 07:45:50 EDT --- New files are here: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/ But the problem is that there still are conflicts with lzma after /usr/bin/*lz* removal. Man pages are conflicting. Only the obsolete man pages are shipped. There are actually no man pages remaining after nuking the lzma related ones... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 11:54:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191154.n5JBsCYd023881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-19 07:54:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > APPROVED. Thanks! Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode Short Description: CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 11:52:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 07:52:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505623] Review Request: python-urllib2_kerberos - Kerberos over HTTP Negotiate/SPNEGO support for urllib2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191152.n5JBqvcW001089@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505623 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-19 07:52:56 EDT --- https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6-3.fc10 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-urllib2_kerberos-0.1.6-3.fc11 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8658 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 12:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191202.n5JC2DLN003392@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-19 08:02:12 EDT --- Thanks. Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH Short Description: Easy DBI access from CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 12:17:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:17:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] New: Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Summary: Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: harald at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/dracut/dracut.spec SRPM URL: http://harald.fedorapeople.org/downloads/dracut/dracut-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: dracut is a new, event-driven initramfs infrastructure based around udev. Will be the mkinitrd/nash replacement. See also: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Dracut -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 12:33:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 08:33:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191233.n5JCXcXG010451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #1 from Harald Hoyer 2009-06-19 08:33:37 EDT --- $ rpmlint /home/harald/git/dracut/dracut-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/harald/git/dracut/noarch/dracut-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /home/harald/git/dracut/noarch/dracut-generic-0.1-1.fc11.noarch.rpm dracut.spec 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191332.n5JDWpga014846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:32:49 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:33:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:33:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191333.n5JDX6GL014944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:33:05 EDT --- perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch-1.12-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191332.n5JDWuo9014898@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0-1.r8442.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:34:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:34:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191334.n5JDYjPw025441@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:34:44 EDT --- vfrnav-0.3-8.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:37:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:37:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191337.n5JDbaO0026703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0-1.r8442.fc11 |0-1.r8442.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191336.n5JDafEn026315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:36:40 EDT --- perl-Alien-SeleniumRC-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:34:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:34:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498413] Review Request: vfrnav - Flight Planning software for flights under Visual Flight Rules (VFR) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191334.n5JDYpev025491@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498413 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3-8.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:36:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:36:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505014] Review Request: perl-Alien-SeleniumRC - Packages the Selenium Remote Control server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191336.n5JDakQm026366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505014 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.00-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:33:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:33:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505260] Review Request: perl-Exception-Class-TryCatch - Syntactic try/catch sugar for use with Exception::Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191333.n5JDXAYc024966@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505260 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.12-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:37:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:37:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502101] Review Request: agedu - An utility for tracking down wasted disk space In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191337.n5JDbViG016806@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502101 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:37:30 EDT --- agedu-0-1.r8442.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191335.n5JDZepB016025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:35:39 EDT --- eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191337.n5JDbKh2016740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:37:20 EDT --- eclipse-veditor-0.6.3-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:37:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:37:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191337.n5JDbP4L016777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.3-3.fc11 |0.6.3-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:35:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:35:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191335.n5JDZjRF016065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.3-3.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191341.n5JDfgJH028870@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.37.0-4.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:40:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:40:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191340.n5JDeFcm028400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.06-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:41:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502554] Review Request: mingw32-boost - MinGW Windows Boost C++ library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191341.n5JDfbnC018735@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502554 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:41:35 EDT --- mingw32-boost-1.37.0-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191343.n5JDh4Kn019158@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:43:03 EDT --- perl-Config-Auto-0.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494872] Review Request: perl-Data-ObjectDriver - Simple, transparent data interface, with caching In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191340.n5JDeAad018052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494872 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-19 09:40:08 EDT --- perl-Data-ObjectDriver-0.06-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:43:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:43:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505046] Review Request: perl-Config-Auto - Magical config file parser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191343.n5JDh9QV019194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505046 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.20-1.fc11 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191343.n5JDh339019128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #10 from Timon 2009-06-19 09:43:01 EDT --- >Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Perl All perl modules must include the versioned MODULE_COMPAT Requires: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) This is to ensure that perl packages have a dependency on a perl which provides the appropriate versioned directory structure (otherwise, the modules won't be found). >Requires: perl-SVN-Notify = %{version}-%{release} fixed > We should remove the following lines: >find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2>/dev/null \; >chmod -R u+rwX,go+rX,go-w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* fixed >The descriptions for the svnnotify contains a line with more the 79 characters. fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:44:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:44:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191344.n5JDi3jE030101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #11 from Timon 2009-06-19 09:44:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348665) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348665) perl-SVN-Notify.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:45:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191345.n5JDjEXb030837@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #12 from Timon 2009-06-19 09:45:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348666) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348666) perl-SVN-Notify-2.79-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:45:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464117] Review Request: perl-SVN-Notify - Perl module for Subversion activity notification In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191345.n5JDjukP020495@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464117 --- Comment #13 from Timon 2009-06-19 09:45:55 EDT --- >I have found out, that a new release 2.79 is available now. fixed -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191354.n5JDsljk001634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #2 from Harald Hoyer 2009-06-19 09:54:46 EDT --- forgot to add, that to test the dracut, you have to: %define with_switch_root 1 in the dracut.spec, until /sbin/switch_root is provided by util-linux-ng -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:00:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:00:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191400.n5JE04n1003402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #4 from Timon 2009-06-19 10:00:04 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348670) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348670) perl-Text-Trac.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 13:59:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191359.n5JDxTfA003011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #3 from Timon 2009-06-19 09:59:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348669) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348669) perl-Text-Trac-0.15-1.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191400.n5JE0baa024336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #5 from Timon 2009-06-19 10:00:36 EDT --- new version perl-Text-Trac-0.15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:07:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:07:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191407.n5JE7q9A005349@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #9 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-19 10:07:49 EDT --- Did you fix directory ownership? Side notes: until 9 or 10th of July it's "exams time" for me.. Maybe I should step back and allow another reviewer to complete the review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:14:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:14:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] New: Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 Summary: Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at traylen.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp-2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: UberFTP is the first interactive, GridFTP-enabled ftp client. It supports GSI authentication, parallel data channels and third party transfers. There is a successful koji build here. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424838 $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/uberftp-2.3-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. I require a package sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:18:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:18:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191418.n5JEIwv1008188@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #6 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-19 10:18:57 EDT --- Correct me if I'm wrong. But you wasn't still sponsored, so you don't have commit access into cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:28:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:28:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191428.n5JES7Sh010380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-19 10:28:07 EDT --- Excuse me. I left a load of debugging the spec file. Updated now: Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp-2.3-2.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1424869 Still no errors with rpmlint. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191439.n5JEduKQ013375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #6 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-19 10:39:55 EDT --- Right, but we explicitly discourage static linking, much less static linking to another C library. (I know that the busybox-anaconda package is actually dynamically linked.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:49:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:49:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191449.n5JEngmj002737@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 --- Comment #7 from Timon 2009-06-19 10:49:42 EDT --- yup. I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191447.n5JElYBr002485@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #53 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-19 10:47:30 EDT --- Can I have a change to have an answear and for the remaining fix to be done ? blender 2.49a is been built, please give it a try. (but it's still crash with yafaray). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191450.n5JEodU2016187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 --- Comment #9 from Bernie Innocenti 2009-06-19 10:50:37 EDT --- Dansguardian already went through RH legal. Their response was: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458643#c8 And that was already implemented in my spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 464141] Review Request: perl-Text-Trac - Perl extension for formatting text with Trac Wiki Style In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191455.n5JEtdJ7017274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464141 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191456.n5JEuN8e004581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 14:56:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:56:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191456.n5JEuLNO004560@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 --- Comment #3 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-19 10:56:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse Short Description: Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 15:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191503.n5JF3qkP006030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-19 11:03:51 EDT --- Thanks, will fix before importing New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: acheck Short Description: Check common localisation mistakes Owners: rakesh Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 15:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191503.n5JF3u5q018887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |notting at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-19 11:03:55 EDT --- - Package meets naming and packaging guidelines - OK - Spec file matches base package name. - OK - Spec has consistant macro usage. - OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines. - OK - License - GPLv2+ - License field in spec matches - *** *** The license in the code is GPLv2 or later; the spec tag should be GPLv2+. It's also not present in most of the shell snippets; unsure what the requirements are there. - License file included in package - OK - Spec in American English - *** generic package description: This package requires everything, which is needed to build a generic all purpose initramfs. Should probably be 'everything that is needed', without the comma. - Spec is legible. - OK - Sources match upstream md5sum: - a6cbc2b0c1dbdec0b37a6ecfadf0a33c1f2e1122 - OK - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** *** The arch/noarch switching seems a bit odd. Can we just get a new util-linux in so we don't need this? - BuildRequires correct - OK - Spec handles locales/find_lang - N/A - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good. - OK - Package has a correct %clean section. - OK - Package has correct buildroot - OK - Package is code or permissible content. - OK - Doc subpackage needed/used. - N/A - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime. - OK - Handles devel libs/ldconfig/pkg-config/etc. correctly - N/A - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch. - OK (tested x86_64 building noarch, x86_64 building x86_64) - Package has no duplicate files in %files. - OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own. - OK - Package owns all the directories it creates. - OK - No rpmlint output. - OK - final provides and requires are sane: - *** The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems wrong.) That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship it. SHOULD Items: - Should build in mock. - OK (see above) - Should build on all supported archs - didn't try - Should function as described. - didn't try - Should have sane scriptlets. - N/A - Should have subpackages require base package with fully versioned depend. - OK - Should have dist tag - OK - Should package latest version - OK Other notes: - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs when /usr isn't present? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 15:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191506.n5JF6hXM006922@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-19 11:06:41 EDT --- Cool, lifting FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 15:55:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:55:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506578] Review Request: rtkit - Realtime Policy and Watchdog Daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191555.n5JFtVl3032291@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506578 Lennart Poettering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 15:53:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:53:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides a plugin framework for displaying runtime information about your CGI::Application app in a popup window. A sample Timing plugin is provided to show how it works. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] New: Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Summary: Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides an easy way to do external redirects in CGI::Application. You don't have to worry about setting headers or worrying about return types, as that is all handled for you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:18:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:18:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191618.n5JGIJtc023799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #19 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-19 12:18:18 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > the other reason for these much comment because as we discussed earlier and as > i wrote in > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW/Packaging_issues#devel_package_split if we > start to create static sub-packages then we've to rethink the packaging to > create devel subpackages similar to the native case. mainly in this case as > there're binaries in the main packages not just dlls. Yeah, this is an issue which should probably be brought up on the mailing list so we can decide which direction we want to go with subpackages. The question which type of executables are allowed also needs to be discussed there as win32 applications aren't really welcome in Fedora (only libraries). I had one remaining question: - Why are the binaries split across two packages? To comply with the Fedora packaging guidelines, the %define's at the top of the .spec file need to be changed to %global's as mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#.25global_preferred_over_.25define It's okay to just replace all occurences of '%define' with '%global' In the latest .spec (0.10.23-1) you've added %{_mingw32_libdir}/*.a to the -static subpackage. The *.a also catches the .dll.a files while those should be in the main package. -> All the *.dll.a files need to be part of the main package -> All the *.a (NOT *.dll.a) files need to be part of the -static subpackage -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191620.n5JGKmj8006209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #13 from Bryson Lee 2009-06-19 12:20:46 EDT --- Posted updated spec and SRPM: http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools.spec http://www.slac.stanford.edu/~blee/tcl-snmptools-1.0-5.fc10.src.rpm This update includes a patch called tcl-snmptools-redirection.patch that addresses a somewhat nasty misfeature of the extension whereby any redirections of stdout/stderr for extension clients are lost when commands provided by the extension are invoked. The extension author freopen()'s stdout / stderr in order to capture output from the underlying NetSNMP library calls for inclusion in the TCL result string, and then does not restore the original streams correctly. The patch has been submitted upstream as tcl-snmptools-Bugs-2808814: stdout, stderr redirections lost https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1035638&aid=2808814&group_id=215927 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:29:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:29:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191629.n5JGTBk8026168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #4 from Harald Hoyer 2009-06-19 12:29:10 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - License - GPLv2+ > - License field in spec matches - *** > > *** The license in the code is GPLv2 or later; the spec tag should be GPLv2+. > It's also not present in most of the shell snippets; unsure what the > requirements are there. oh, yes, will change > - Spec in American English - *** > > generic package description: > This package requires everything, which is needed to build a generic > all purpose initramfs. > > Should probably be 'everything that is needed', without the comma. ok, will change > - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** > > *** The arch/noarch switching seems a bit odd. Can we just get a new util-linux > in so we don't need this? yes, we still have to have this for F-11 and have to wait a little bit for F-12 > The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the > main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems > wrong.) ok, then I rename it to dracut-buildall? > > That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. > tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and > it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been > installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship > it. if the tools haven't been installed.. so you mean running a lvm / crypto / raid root without the tools ? > Other notes: > - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs > when /usr isn't present? good point! and plymouth? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191635.n5JGZRXf009769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-19 12:35:25 EDT --- OK, then this package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:50:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:50:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499469] Review Request: libtalloc - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191650.n5JGoXqp031287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499469 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes 2009-06-19 12:50:32 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 16:51:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:51:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499491] Review Request: libtdb - spin off of samba4 package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191651.n5JGp47r031446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499491 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Matthew Barnes 2009-06-19 12:51:02 EDT --- Closing this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 17:04:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:04:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191704.n5JH4Wo3016214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #46 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-19 13:04:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > Lubomir: How about: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 Umm, somehow. Please try to follow the review guidelines and note the things you have checked: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines You may search bugzilla for closed review requests to see how are they usually done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 17:07:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:07:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191707.n5JH7shn002846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-19 13:07:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > I received the following reply from Boris Kolpackov > > ====================================================== > Thanks for your effort in packaging XSD for Fedora, it is very much > appreciated. Regarding the licensing issue, unfortunately relicensing > the code under "GPLv2 or later" is not an option at the moment and > making it "GPLv2 with exceptions" opens up a potential maintenance > problem. Let me explain: the files that are under GPLv2 are from the > base libraries that provide functionality that is not related to (nor > is aware of) Xerces-C++. In other words, code from, say libcult, is > used to parse command line arguments and just happens to be in the > same executable (xsdcxx) as code that uses Xerces-C++. Since this > GPLv2 code is not interacting in any way with the Xerces-C++ code > under ASL 2.0, my understanding of the licenses suggests that there > is no issue in having these two pieces of code in the same executable. NO. http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#MereAggregation i.e. "Having these two pieces of code in the same executable" makes these all parts one big program and in this case all these codes must be GPLv2+ compatible. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 17:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191714.n5JHEtL3004199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | --- Comment #3 from Stepan Kasal 2009-06-19 13:14:54 EDT --- The build failed because of an unresolved symbol in Class/XSAccessor.so. To fix that, I updated perl-AutoXS-Header to 1.02-1.fc12 and then rebuild perl-Class-XSAccessor-1.03-2.fc12 So an hour after now, when the repo catches the *XSAccessor-*-2.fc12 rpm, there is a chance that the reviewed rpm could build OK. I'm in a hurry right now, could you please try to build the rpm yourself? (If it still fails, then please accept my apology and return the "NotReady" to whiteboard.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 17:25:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:25:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191725.n5JHPK6E021714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Felix Kaechele changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Felix Kaechele 2009-06-19 13:25:18 EDT --- Okay. Thank you for the Review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dansguardian Short Description: Content filtering web proxy Owners: heffer Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 17:54:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:54:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491317] Review Request: mingw32-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191754.n5JHsBPA028840@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491317 --- Comment #20 from Levente Farkas 2009-06-19 13:54:10 EDT --- because it was done in this way in the native packages and i follow it. yes this guidelines created after i made this spec but now i change this define. i fix the .a files. http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SPECS/mingw32-gstreamer.spec http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/i386/cross/SRPMS/mingw32-gstreamer-0.10.23-2.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1425246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 19:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499319] Review Request: tcl-snmptools - TCL extension for SNMP support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191911.n5JJBcag012558@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499319 --- Comment #14 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-19 15:11:37 EDT --- rpmlint output: tcl-snmptools.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.0-4 ['1.0-5.fc11', '1.0-5'] 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. - You are missing the latest version from the changelog. - The line install -d %{buildroot}%{tcl_sitearch} should be dropped since it doesn't do anything (it's after the install command). - You seem to be missing BR: tcl, since Mock Version: 0.9.16 ENTER do(['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/tcl-snmptools.spec'], False, '/var/mock/fedora-11-x86_64/root/', None, 0, True, 0, 500, 494, None, logger=) Executing command: ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bs --target x86_64 --nodeps builddir/build/SPECS/tcl-snmptools.spec'] sh: tclsh: command not found sh: tclsh: command not found sh: tclsh: command not found - A comment on style: I suggest using trailing slashes for directories in the %files section: %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/ instead of %{tcl_sitearch}/%{realname}%{version}/ Apart from these minor issues I think the package is good to go. Do you have other submissions? Have you done informal reviews of other people's packages? Before I sponsor you, you need to show me you're worth it :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 19:28:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906191928.n5JJS6nQ000928@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-19 15:28:05 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > > - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** > > The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the > > main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems > > wrong.) > > ok, then I rename it to dracut-buildall? Well, I'm not sure it needs to exist. More below. > > That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. > > tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and > > it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been > > installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship > > it. > > if the tools haven't been installed.. so you mean running a lvm / crypto / raid > root without the tools ? anaconda never runs mkinitrd; it simply relies on the kernel %post script to run it to make a working initramfs. If you're doing an install to a RAID device, or LVM, or encrypted FS, etc., those tools need to be on the installed system when the kernel package is installed and mkinitrd/dracut is run. Without Requires: in the mkinitrd/dracut package, there's no guarantee that this is the case. (We had to respin mkinitrd to require kbd for F-11 because of this, as it wasn't getting the proper keymaps for the user to enter passwords.) So, we likely just need all these requires in the main package itself. > > Other notes: > > - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs > > when /usr isn't present? > > good point! and plymouth? Hm, when you put it that way, maybe it's not such a big deal. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 21:37:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:37:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906192137.n5JLbdKA030450@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #54 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-06-19 17:37:38 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348714) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348714) Selinux denial from the yafaray package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 21:56:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 17:56:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] New: Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Summary: Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rspanton at zepler.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: I just packaged pymunk. I think it complies with all the regs. Pymunk is a Python wrapper for the wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine. A review would be marvellous :-D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 19 22:28:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 18:28:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906192228.n5JMSLen008510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Jonathan Steffan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-06-19 18:28:20 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/blueproximity.spec SRPM URL: http://jsteffan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/blueproximity-1.2.5-4.fc9.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: blueproximity Short Description: Detects you via your bluetooth devices and locks/unlocks the screen Owners: jsteffan Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 02:15:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 22:15:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906200215.n5K2F0o0018749@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|NotReady | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 08:01:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:01:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507052] New: Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507052 Summary: Review Request: Panini - A tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle images Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/panini.spec SRPM URL: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/panini/panini-0.62.83-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Panini is a visual tool for creating perspective views from panoramic and wide angle photographs. More than a pano viewer, more than a view camera, with features of both. For Linux/Unix, Win32, and Mac systems with OpenGL 2.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 08:19:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:19:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906200819.n5K8JiqM024006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-20 04:19:42 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1426043 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 3d97505a63a31c768090aa12cb81e3672cbbf786 CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=9, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.25 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.32 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc12.noarch Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Redirect) = 1.00 Requires: perl(Exporter) perl(strict) perl(vars) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 08:19:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 04:19:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906200819.n5K8Jmcr024035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-20 04:19:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1426041 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url e04db7a114e5406e732037e51422c95528d0e22f CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=5, Tests=9, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.02 sys + 0.43 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.57 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc12.noarch Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DevPopup) = 1.01 perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DevPopup::HTTPHeaders) = 0.11 perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DevPopup::Log) = 0.01 perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::DevPopup::Timing) = 0.91 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) >= 4.01 perl(HTML::Template) perl(IO::Scalar) perl(Time::HiRes) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 09:04:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:04:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] New: Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Summary: Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jolsa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jolsa/latrace/latrace.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jolsa/latrace/latrace-0.5.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is my first package so I need a sponsor. latrace allows you to trace library calls and get their statistics in a manner similar to the strace utility (syscall tracing) - display dynamic library functions as they are called - fast, using callbacks directly from dynamic loader (LD_AUDIT feature) - display function arguments (C style config file) - display statistics for called functions - x86/x86_64/ARM ports - extensive man page doc - http://latrace.sourceforge.net/ - http://latrace.sourceforge.net/latrace.html - http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man7/rtld-audit.7.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 09:06:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 05:06:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906200906.n5K96lar000303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Jiri Olsa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 10:54:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:54:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506174] Review Request: qtdmm - a digital multimeter readout software In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201054.n5KAsdtZ018974@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506174 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Zabolotny 2009-06-20 06:54:38 EDT --- Okay, did it. btw what's the issue with EL-5? why it would want to set vendor to empty (which is not set in the .desktop file anyway). Updated spec file: http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/QtDMM.spec Updated SRPM: http://cs.ozerki.net/zap/pub/rpm/QtDMM-0.8.12-1.fc11.zap.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 10:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201054.n5KAsa9G018946@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-20 06:54:35 EDT --- Thanks, Parag. Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect Short Description: Easy external redirects in CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 10:53:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 06:53:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201053.n5KArVJU032745@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-20 06:53:30 EDT --- Thanks! Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup Short Description: Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 11:32:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:32:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201132.n5KBWuv0007015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nikolay at vladimiroff.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nikolay at vladimiroff.com --- Comment #2 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-20 07:32:55 EDT --- I'm starting the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 11:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:35:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201135.n5KBZDg7026232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #13 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-20 07:35:11 EDT --- OK! I try to build it on koji. It is OK. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1426116 I think that it should be approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 11:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201135.n5KBZXlb026297@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 11:41:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:41:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This plugin provides a way to stream a file back to the user, which is useful if you are creating a PDF or Spreadsheet document dynamically to deliver to the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 11:38:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 07:38:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::Session seamlessly adds session support to your CGI::Application modules by providing a CGI::Session object that is accessible from anywhere in the application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 13:08:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:08:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201308.n5KD8vFe010279@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 09:08:56 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff looks ok to me - though you should keep periods in the descriptions, which should be made of sentences. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 13:09:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:09:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201309.n5KD9VEn024046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(loupgaroublond at gm | |ail.com) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 13:23:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:23:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201323.n5KDNTGW013220@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-20 09:23:28 EDT --- The package can not be built. It requires clutter 0.9.4 and the latest fedora version is 0.9.2 for f12 Otherwise everything seems fine. I'll do an in detail review when that's fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 13:48:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:48:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201348.n5KDmcLH018243@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #3 from steve 2009-06-20 09:48:37 EDT --- sorry, in point (a), it should've been: -Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz you get the idea right? :) gah ! - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 13:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201345.n5KDjDqp017891@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at lonetwin.net Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from steve 2009-06-20 09:45:12 EDT --- Hi ! Although i cannot sponsor you yet, I've reviewed your package. Here are some comments: a. Change the 'Source' tag URL to point to the correct upstream source URL[1]: -Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz +Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz b. rpmlint on the binary rpm returns a warning: [steve at laptop SPECS]$ rpmlint -i /home/steve/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/tmux-0.8-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm tmux.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/tmux.1.gz The file is installed with executable permissions, but was identified as one that probably should not be executable. Verify if the executable bits are desired, and remove if not. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [steve at laptop SPECS]$ So, you'd want to modify the tmux-0.8-fixperms.patch to keep the permissions settings as they are and may be just remove the explicit ownership settings. c. It is preferable to not wildcard everything in %files in such a general manner. You may want to be specific for at least the %{_bindir} (since it is only 1 file each for bindir and mandir, there is no reason why you should have wildcards). Also, I'll set the FE-NEEDSPONSOR in the bug blocks[2] cheers, - steve [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 13:55:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:55:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201355.n5KDt0h8019231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |nikolay at vladimiroff.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nikolay at vladimiroff.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:09:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:09:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226305] Merge Review: poppler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201409.n5KE9Unh002227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226305 Bug 226305 depends on bug 437247, which changed state. Bug 437247 Summary: poppler-utils conflicting with pdftohtml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437247 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |WONTFIX Status|NEW |CLOSED Bug 226305 depends on bug 275541, which changed state. Bug 275541 Summary: stricter Requires: needed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275541 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:14:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:14:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] New: Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Summary: Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/.fc11.src.rpm Description: Libinfinity is used in the collaborative editing tool Kobby. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:16:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:16:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201416.n5KEGvRd023287@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel 2009-06-20 10:16:56 EDT --- ugh. Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libinfinity/libinfinity.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libinfinity-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507072] New: Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Summary: Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kobby/kobby.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/kobby/kobby-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11.src.rpm Description: KDE collaborative editor using the infinote protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] New: Review Request: libqinfinity - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: libqinfinity - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Summary: Review Request: libqinfinity - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mathstuf at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libqinfinity/libqinfinity.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libqinfinity/libqinfinity-1.0-0.1.b3.fc11.src.rpm Description: Wrapper for libinfinity for Qt applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:29:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201429.n5KETGMS005882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-20 10:29:15 EDT --- MUST: * rpmlint output: 0 errors, 0 warnings ( both srpm and binary rpm) * package name: OK * The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption: OK * Packaging Guidelines: OK * License: OK * The License field file matches the actual license: OK * License included in %doc: OK * The spec file must be written in American English: OK * The spec file for the package MUST be legible: OK * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: OK * The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: OK ( on i586) * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: OK * The spec file MUST handle locales properly: N/A ( no locales) * Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory: OK * A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings: OK * Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line: OK * Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK * Each package must consistently use macros: OK * The package must contain code, or permissable content: OK * No need for -doc subpackage: OK * Header files must be in a -devel package: OK * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability): OK * If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package: OK * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} : OK * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built: OK * At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK * All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 : OK SHOULD Items: * The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock: OK (for i586 rawhide) It's all OK. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201433.n5KEXvMm006766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #4 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-20 10:33:57 EDT --- clutter 0.9.4 is built: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1426252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:45:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:45:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201445.n5KEjpR0008992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #5 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-20 10:45:50 EDT --- Ok, Thanks. I'll wait for the rawhide repo update tomorrow to do a mock build. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 14:57:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 10:57:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201457.n5KEv2Rf030110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 10:57:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201502.n5KF24Ca011770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:02:02 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:00:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:00:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461393] Review Request: =?utf-8?q?_congruity_-_Application_t?= =?utf-8?q?o_program_Logitech=C2=AE_Harmony=C2=AE_universal_remote_control?= =?utf-8?q?s?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201500.n5KF0aW1011603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461393 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:00:32 EDT --- "InitialCC" must be an existing Fedora account, not an email address, so I've left it blank. If you have an account already, you can go to the pkgdb page for this package and add yourself. Otherwise, CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:02:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:02:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201502.n5KF2gl9031091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:02:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201501.n5KF1NUG030924@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:01:21 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:04:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:04:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201504.n5KF49vu031265@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:04:08 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:03:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201503.n5KF3PEu011990@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:03:24 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201505.n5KF5hs0012637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:05:42 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:06:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:06:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500013] Review Request: dansguardian - Content filtering web proxy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201506.n5KF6xq5032140@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500013 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:06:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:06:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:06:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201506.n5KF62iH031845@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:06:01 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:09:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:09:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201509.n5KF9c3l032463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #43 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:09:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:07:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:07:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201507.n5KF7xm2032256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:07:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:08:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:08:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201508.n5KF8cpx013011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:08:37 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:09:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:09:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201509.n5KF9FRk013100@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:09:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201548.n5KFmUFg007059@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #27 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:48:27 EDT --- I didn't propose waiting for policy; I only suggested that the selinux issues be documented so that people (or at least those who read documentation) don't inadvertently hose their systems. I still don't see why you wouldn't want to do that, but I suppose if the policy issues are being worked out then there's no reason not to push things forward. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201550.n5KFo31t020617@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:50:00 EDT --- And it's been over a month since comment #4 with no response. I guess I'll go ahead and close this soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:51:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:51:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201551.n5KFpmpu021009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:51:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201551.n5KFpMNA020913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 11:51:21 EDT --- So it's been a couple of months; did you intend to provide a new package or should I just close this out? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 15:55:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 11:55:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201555.n5KFtuha008491@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nikolay at vladimiroff.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nikolay at vladimiroff.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-20 11:55:55 EDT --- Mock build failed: checking for GCONF... configure: error: Package requirements (gconf-2.0) were not met: No package 'gconf-2.0' found Please fix this and update the srpm and spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 16:10:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:10:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201610.n5KGA8NU024425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #16 from Mat Booth 2009-06-20 12:10:07 EDT --- Any progress on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 16:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201624.n5KGOe0v026918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-20 12:24:39 EDT --- Some notes: * chrpath - We usually recommend to avoid to use chrpath as the means to delete rpath (and to add "chrpath" as BR(BuildRequires)) and instead recommend to try to remove rpath by modifying configure/libtool. For this packge: ----------------------------------------------------------------- %build %{__cat} <<'EOF' >libpuzzle.ini extension=libpuzzle.so EOF %configure --disable-static sed -i.rpath -e 's|^\(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=\).*|\1""|' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool make %{?_smp_mflags} ....... ....... cd php/libpuzzle phpize %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS -L%{_builddir}/prelim2/usr/lib64"; export LDFLAGS %endif sed -i.rpath -e 's|\$ld_runpath_switch\$ai_p||g' configure %configure --with-libpuzzle=%{_builddir}/prelim2/usr sed -i.rpath -e 's|^\(hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=\).*|\1""|' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool make %{?_smp_mflags} ........ ........ ----------------------------------------------------------------- will remove rpath: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1426380 Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath * Requires - php-%{name} should have "Requires: php-common" for directory ownership issue * Usage of %_builddir ----------------------------------------------------------------- make DESTDIR=%{_builddir}/prelim2 install ----------------------------------------------------------------- - This is problematic is some other srpm use prelim2 directory. Please move this temporary directory to under %_builddir/%{name}-%{version} (and using "rm -rf %{_builddir}/prelim2" at clean is not desired) * Timestamps - Add the option 'INSTALL="install -p"' to 'make install' to keep timestamps on installed files. This method usually works for Makefiles generated by recent autotools. * Documents - There is no need to include the same document files to %doc of both libpuzzle and -devel packages. - Usually section 3 man pages are to explain functions, api or so and should belong to -devel subpackage. * %changelog - It is useful when importing this package into Fedora CVS if you put one line between each %changelog entry like: ------------------------------------------------------------------ * Thu Jun 18 2009 Andrew Colin Kissa - 0.11-2 - Fix rpmlint issues * Sun May 14 2009 Andrew Colin Kissa - 0.11-1 - Initial release ------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 16:35:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 12:35:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201635.n5KGZiG3029118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-20 12:35:42 EDT --- Will review shortly. Instead I will appreciate it if you would review either of my review requests (bug 504707, bug 504710, bug 505406 or bug 506168) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 17:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] New: Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Summary: Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ian at ianweller.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mediawiki-HTTP302Found/1.0-1/mediawiki-HTTP302Found.spec SRPM URL: http://ianweller.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/mediawiki-HTTP302Found/1.0-1/mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Pushes a HTTP code 302 (Found) to the browser when there is a redirect instead of handling it internally. The end user will not notice any difference (other than the address to the page having an ?rd=Redirecting_page bit at the end). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 17:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504424] Review Request: ruby-json - A JSON implementation in Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201715.n5KHFAg2022828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504424 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-20 13:15:09 EDT --- Some notes: * native ruby module vs rubygem - As json rubygem is available, would you consider to use json rubygem to package rpm instead of using native tarball? ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Packaging_for_Gem_and_non-Gem_use * License - Should be "Ruby or GPLv2" * BR - You should use "BR: rubygem(rake)" instead of "BR: rubygem-rake" like perl. Ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Perl#Perl_Requires_and_Provides ! Requires ! json/editor.rb requires ruby(gtk2). Should "ruby(gtk2)" be added as the Requires of this package or should this script be separated into a subpackage? * Stripping binaries * json/ext/*.so should not be stripped to create debuginfo rpm correctly -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 17:22:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:22:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201722.n5KHMLHf004535@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nikolay at vladimiroff.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nikolay at vladimiroff.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-20 13:22:20 EDT --- MUST: * rpmlint output: 0 errors, 0 warnings ( both srpm and binary rpm) * package name: OK * The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption: OK * Packaging Guidelines: The Source0 is an exemption but it's OK. The upstream package naming is bad. Please contact them if they can change it. * License: OK * The License field file matches the actual license: FAIL The package license is GPLv2 and the spec states LGPLv2 * License included in %doc: OK * The spec file must be written in American English: OK * The spec file for the package MUST be legible: OK * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: FAIL Please look into this: 961c0054fe2cd80be5721534981b144a BOGNOR_0_4_5.tar.bz2 98da8af1a9decb73904233d022169e9c bognor-regis-0.4.5.tar.bz2 * The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: OK ( on i586) * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: OK * The spec file MUST handle locales properly: N/A ( no locales) * Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory: OK * A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings: OK * Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line: OK * Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK * Each package must consistently use macros: OK * The package must contain code, or permissable content: OK * Header files must be in a -devel package: OK * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability): OK * If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package: OK * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} : OK * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built: OK * At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK * All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 : OK SHOULD Items: * The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock: OK (for i586 rawhide) ~ It's OK. But there are some critical things that need fixing. After you update the package I'll give the approve. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 17:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201734.n5KHYM9l025876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-20 13:34:21 EDT --- I will review this shortly. Instead I will appreciate it if you would review either of my review requests (bug 504707, bug 504710, bug 505406 or bug 506168) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 17:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507083] New: Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Summary: Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: udushlivy at mail.ru QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/poco-1.3.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The POCO C++ Libraries (POCO stands for POrtable COmponents) are open source C++ class libraries that simplify and accelerate the development of network-centric, portable applications in C++. The POCO C++ Libraries are built strictly on standard ANSI/ISO C++, including the standard library. (This is the first submission.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 17:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 13:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201752.n5KHq3mA029441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Maxim Udushlivy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 18:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201817.n5KIHnNJ014389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-20 14:17:48 EDT --- Well, - COPYING file is empty - No other files indicates under which license the overall of this software is released - There are some codes which contains no license information So I must say the license of this software is unclear. Would you ask the upstream about this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 18:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:33:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 450527] Review Request: libkni3 - C++ library for the Katana robot arm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201833.n5KIXNv4004677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450527 --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 14:33:19 EDT --- This one seems to address the complaints I had previously. rpmlint is down to come complaints about no-documentation and the two zero-length files. The library situation seems sorted, and along with it the debuginfo package, and everything builds fine with current rawhide. One question I have is what you plan to do with /etc/kni and /usr/include/kni. Should they be renamed to follow the naming of this package and to avoid conflicts with the libkni package you intend to submit? It's probably easier to sort that out now rather than later. It is now perfectly safe to assume that %fedora >= 10, so the txlive-utils/tetex conditional can go away. (Or if you intend to submit this for EPEL, you can use a conditional based on %rhel, but either way the %fedora comparison is useless.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 18:41:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:41:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507089] New: Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 Summary: Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pgf at laptop.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-powerd.spec-7-1 SRPM URL: http://dev.laptop.org/~pgf/rpms/srpms/olpc-powerd-7-1.src.rpm Description: olpc-powerd provides a power management system for the OLPC XO laptop. It lets the user configure different screen dim, screen blank, and system sleep times for each of wall-powered, battery-powerd, and "ebook" modes. Other power-related settings (shutdown after inactivity, optional sleep on lid close, etc) are also supported. The power button is configured to allow either shutting down or sleeping, in a fairly intuitive manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 18:46:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:46:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201846.n5KIktaf007201@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 --- Comment #1 from Paul Fox 2009-06-20 14:46:54 EDT --- i've attempted to apply all the lessons i learned during the olpc-kbdshim review. hope i've succeeded. i'm aware that the post-install hook that disables ohmd is almost certainly not acceptable. ohmd and olpc-powerd cannot run at the same time, though they can co-exist otherwise. i'm hoping for advice on this. i also just noticed that the Source0: line is incorrect -- my automated package build commmands aren't correct yet. my apologies. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201904.n5KJ4AaS010020@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-20 15:04:10 EDT --- Hi Maxim. Glad to see another russian Fedora member. Regarding your submission - since it is in a very good shape, at least at a first glance, I'll review it ASAP (today or tomorrow). BTW feel free to join fedora-devel at conference.jabber.ru if you have some technical questions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201912.n5KJC9bj024167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #4 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-20 15:12:08 EDT --- Steve, Many thanks for the review and the helpful comments. I will revise the spec to address the issues you identified. And thanks also for setting the FE-NEEDSPONSOR. I saw that in the guides, but was a bit unsure exactly what to do there. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:27:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:27:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201927.n5KJRJRh014151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-20 15:27:18 EDT --- small pet peave, lose the "for KDE". :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:34:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:34:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201934.n5KJYGvO015271@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507070 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201934.n5KJYFGT015245@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es Blocks| |507072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:35:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:35:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201935.n5KJZ899028476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507071 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:35:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:35:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201935.n5KJZ7YR028449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es Blocks| |507072 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507089] Review Request: olpc-powerd - power management for the XO laptop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201935.n5KJZUvw028632@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507089 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-20 15:35:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > i've attempted to apply all the lessons i learned during the olpc-kbdshim > review. hope i've succeeded. We'll see. ;) Stay tuned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 19:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906201958.n5KJwYIh032526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(boni.vivek at gmail. | |com) | --- Comment #10 from vivek shah 2009-06-20 15:58:32 EDT --- I have updated the spec and generated srpm as per suggestion. Can we please quickly move with the review. Thanks. Spec URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/spec/sovix.spec SRPM URL: http://bonii.fedorapeople.org/srpms/sovix-0.0.1.7-2.fc9.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 20:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503202] Review Request: blueproximity - A tool that locks/unlocks your screen when your bluetooth devices gets away/near from your computer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202018.n5KKIdeP003610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503202 Jonathan Steffan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-06-20 16:18:38 EDT --- Imported and builds issued. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blueproximity-1.2.5-4.fc11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blueproximity-1.2.5-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 20:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202034.n5KKYRw2006429@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #11 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-20 16:34:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > - 'Requires: webserver' has to be 'Requires: httpd' Fabian, this is wrong, too. We have several web servers in Fedora and they all have a virtual provides on "webserver". Vivek, what's your FAS account name? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 21:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:13:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202113.n5KLDCHv000516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 --- Comment #31 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-20 17:13:06 EDT --- It's been nearly half a year since this was approved; has anything happened that would allow this to move forward? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 21:24:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:24:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202124.n5KLOevL002528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-20 17:24:39 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 21:24:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:24:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202124.n5KLO9t2015503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-20 17:24:07 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 21:39:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:39:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202139.n5KLdamO005099@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #5 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-20 17:39:35 EDT --- I believe I have addressed the issues Steve identified. Here are links to the updated Spec and SRPM[1]: Spec URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux.spec SRPM URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux-0.8-2.fc11.src.rpm On the man page permissions, the Makefile sets those to 444, but in the tmux-0.8-fixperms.patch I modfied it to 644 to match what appears to be the prevailing standard in /usr/share/man/man1. As a result of the updates, I bumped the release to 2 and updated the changlog. I checked rpmlint -i on the spec, RPM, and SRPM and had no warnings or errors. I also built in mock with f11-x86_64 and f11-i386 chroot with no errors. Finally, I tested this updated release on koji and it appears to build fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1426777 Thanks! [1] The old Spec and SRPM can be found at: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/old -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 21:41:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 17:41:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507106] New: Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507106 Summary: Review Request: msp430-libc - C library for use with GCC on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rspanton at zepler.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-libc.spec SRPM URL: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/mspgcc/msp430-libc-0-1.20090620cvs.fc11.src.rpm Description: I've just finished packaging msp430-libc, which is a C library for use on Texas Instruments MSP430 microcontrollers with the mspgcc toolchain. Please review :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 22:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202207.n5KM7pHX009896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #2 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-20 18:07:50 EDT --- 1) SRPM URL is http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libinfinity/libinfinity-0.3.0-1.fc11.src.rpm 2) It doesn't generate a package as it is missing files in %files 3) You are supposed to run rpmlint on the final packages and include them in the review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 22:06:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:06:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202206.n5KM6P6M009776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 22:26:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:26:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202226.n5KMQhnQ013239@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-20 18:26:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > > - The email address in the changelog should be the same as in Bugzilla (for > > your Bugzilla account). Otherwise it will be hard to find you. > > Why that? Email address need to match in bugzilla and in FAS, but IMO that's > all. I guess that I was thinking that if you are looking at a spec file, find a e-mail address in the spec file, and want to search for other Bugzilla entries associated to this address. But perhaps this is more a personal sensation. That's why I wrote 'should' and not 'must' ;-) (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #7) > > > - 'Requires: webserver' has to be 'Requires: httpd' > > Fabian, this is wrong, too. We have several web servers in Fedora and they all > have a virtual provides on "webserver". That's true. I didn't know that when I wrote comment #7 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 22:27:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:27:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] New: Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Summary: Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linuxdonald at linuxdonald.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora It?s my first fedora package and i need an sponsor Spec URL: http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: OpenAL Soft is a cross-platform software implementation of the OpenAL 3D audio API. It's built off of the open-sourced Windows version available originally from the SVN repository at openal.org. OpenAL provides capabilities for playing audio in a virtual 3d environment. Distance attenuation, doppler shift, and directional sound emitters are among the features handled by the API. More advanced effects, including air absorption, low-pass filters, and reverb, are available through the EFX extension. It also facilitates streaming audio, multi-channel buffers, and audio capture. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 22:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202252.n5KMqgAs030802@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #3 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-20 18:52:41 EDT --- Opps my bad, it builds in mock, guess i have extra unneeded deps that allow extra stuff. Everything looks good unless you want that extra stuff (IIRC it was some translations) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202318.n5KNIC7H021992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-20 19:18:11 EDT --- Still, that's a sign of missing BuildRequires somewhere, it'd be worth investigating. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202319.n5KNJfDY022168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:19:40 EDT --- Zach, you need to include the dependency on libXft explicitly by adding BuildRequires: libXft-devel to the base (src) package and Requires: libXft-devel to the devel subpackage. Unfortunately cabal2spec is not smart enough to do that yet. That should allow the package to build in mock and avoid linking errors etc with the devel package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:24:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:24:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202324.n5KNOS4A023066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #14 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:24:27 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348767) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348767) ghc-X11-xft.spec-1.patch Perhaps I confused you about fullstops in the previous review. Just to clarify, the rule of thumb is no fullstops (periods) in the summary field but fullstops in the description fields: you can follow the example of cabal2spec there. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202333.n5KNXOZH024713@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:33:22 EDT --- I guess you want to depend on utf8-string, X11-xft, and hinotify? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:36:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202336.n5KNa5qu025477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460974(xmobar) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:36:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:36:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202336.n5KNa6XN025502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460974(xmobar) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426750] Review Request: ghc-utf8-string - Support reading and writing UTF8 Strings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202336.n5KNa4G6025436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426750 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |460974(xmobar) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:36:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:36:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202336.n5KNa3EJ025308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |426752, 503250, 426750 Alias| |xmobar -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:41:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:41:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202341.n5KNfmXR007221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #8 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:41:47 EDT --- Actually we have had haskell-src-exts-0.4.8 all along so no problem there. (Latest version is 0.5.6 though, but nevermind - might be worth asking the hlint author about that.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:44:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:44:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479800] Review Request: hlint - Provides Haskell Source Code Suggestions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202344.n5KNiKOj007476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479800 --- Comment #9 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:44:19 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:48:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:48:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202348.n5KNm2JC027452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:47:59 EDT --- Zach, maybe we can let Yaakov have this one. ;-) I think he would be happy to have you as comaintainer if that works for you. Yaakov: I assume you meant http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 20 23:50:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 19:50:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906202350.n5KNoSDs028062@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #13 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 19:50:27 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/review/ghc-xmonad-contrib-0.8.1-5.fc11.src.rpm srpm looks broken (only 4kB) - partial upload? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 00:00:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:00:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488397] Review Request: ghc-tar - Reading, writing and manipulating ".tar" archive files in Haskell In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210000.n5L00fJL010583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488397 --- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 20:00:39 EDT --- cabal2spec-diff looks fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 00:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 20:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210041.n5L0fIor004206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen 2009-06-20 20:41:16 EDT --- I found http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-hinotify-0.2-2.fc11.src.rpm (spec seems to be slightly older). cabal2spec-diff output looks ok. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 01:33:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:33:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210133.n5L1XaLH012701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 01:45:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 21:45:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210145.n5L1jDRE027845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-06-20 21:45:12 EDT --- Updatet the SPEC and SRPM file because openal-soft-devel conflicts with openal-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 04:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504707] Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210401.n5L41cNh018331@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oget.fedora at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-21 00:01:37 EDT --- I reviewed this package. There is only one tiny license issue: * I think the .js files that go to the %doc package are licensed under MIT. Please verify this and change the license tag of the doc package if appropriate. ------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-locale_rails) is APPROVED by oget ------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 04:10:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:10:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210410.n5L4ASj8006833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 05:19:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 01:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489686] Review Request: armadillo - fast C++ matrix library with interfaces to LAPACK and ATLAS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210519.n5L5JN2s017833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489686 --- Comment #68 from Conrad Sanderson 2009-06-21 01:19:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #67) > So, that is fine for me with boost-devel and atlas-devel. Moreover, as stated > in comment #59 by Michael, "libstdc++-devel is assumed to be available, too, > and need not be specified as a Requires/BuildRequires in any package". ok, I take it to mean the package is now all okay by everyone. Chitlesh, what are your thoughts on approval ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 06:04:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:04:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210604.n5L64CPZ005641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #13 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-21 02:04:10 EDT --- I will. Thanks Mamoru -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 06:03:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:03:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210603.n5L637N0005479@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net Bug 505154 depends on bug 505017, which changed state. Bug 505017 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 06:39:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:39:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210639.n5L6dgrS030788@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #13 from vivek shah 2009-06-21 02:39:41 EDT --- Christoph, my FAS account name is bonii. I have a few observations. 1. I had listed "webserver" in the Requires section since I wanted to ensure we can capitalise on the web servers which have a virtual Provides on "webserver". There is another possible counter angle we need to see. Sovix recommends Apache web server so in this scenario, should we use "webserver" in the Requires or the web server upstream is recommending for use ? 2. Since both the emails bonii at fedoraproject.org and boni.vivek @ gmail.com link to me (and are not dead), it should not be an issue. Please tell me if there are further changes required in the package. Thanks Chirstoph and Fabian for the quick comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 06:40:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 02:40:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210640.n5L6elcE031193@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 --- Comment #14 from vivek shah 2009-06-21 02:40:46 EDT --- Sorry about the mistake in spelling your name, Christoph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 09:11:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:11:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210911.n5L9BbS3027071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 05:11:36 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 09:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210932.n5L9WX37030566@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #8 from Ville Skytt? 2009-06-21 05:32:31 EDT --- Well, an AFAICT complete working solution was already given in comment 1: "Ship the xz package as is from my specfile, and modify the current Fedora lzma package so that everything else except lzmainfo and its man page is removed from the main lzma package, and add "Requires: xz" to the main package (leave lzma-libs and lzma-devel as is)." -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 09:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 05:46:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906210946.n5L9kCgW013325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-21 05:46:11 EDT --- Hi Thanks for the review, I have addressed all the points that you raised. The updated spec and source rpm can be found at. http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle.spec http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle-0.11-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:03:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:03:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] New: Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Summary: Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-pyrsos-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This typeface first appeared in the late 20s and was used as an alternative italic type to the most commonly used Greek italics at the time, coming from Germany (Leipsig). The name commemorates the edition of the Greek encyclop?dia Pyrsos (1927-1933) from which the types were taken. The font was digitally designed by George D. Matthiopoulos and is freely available by GFS. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_Pyrsos_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] New: Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Summary: Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-decker-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://nim.fedorapeople.org/gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This typeface is a product of Deckersche Schriftgie?ere typefoundry owned by Rudolf Ludwig Decker (1804-1877) in Berlin, but it was frequently used in Greek editions by both Oxford and Cambridge University Press during the last decades of the 19th century. It was designed and cut before 1864, according to John Bowman, when a set of matrices was bought by OUP, although the type was not cast and used in England until 1882. The typeface is an uncial design containing a case of capitals, and small capitals, too. The letters lack any sherifs although they retain their thick and thin strokes. It appeared as an alternate type of Byzantine tradition in mostly patristic texts. The font was digitally designed by George D. Matthiopoulos and is freely available by GFS. See also http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GFS_Decker_fonts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] New: Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Summary: Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola at iki.fi QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte.spec SRPM URL: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Upstream url: http://efte.cowgar.com Description: eFTE is an advanced programmers editor with goals of being lightweight, yet totally configurable. Support for user defined programming languages, menu systems and key bindings are provided with many common defaults already defined. eFTE is still a new project, however, we extend from the FTE editor which was first released in 1995, so eFTE is tried and true with many features for the programmer/text editor. rpmlint output is clean. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:47:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211047.n5LAlnK0024427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:47:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:47:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211047.n5LAlNMe024375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 10:57:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 06:57:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211057.n5LAvawX026104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 06:57:35 EDT --- pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 11:11:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:11:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211111.n5LBBlwJ015436@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 07:11:46 EDT --- - Your patch "0001-Use-the-chipmunk-shared-library-from-the-chipmunk-pa.patch" is incorrectly named. The name should be pymunk-(something).patch, e.g. pymunk-sharedlib.patch. - You need to change the patch from libfn = "/usr/lib/libchipmunk.so" to e.g. lib=`ls %{_libdir}/libchipmunk.so.*` sed -i "s|/usr/lib/libchipmunk.so|$lib|g" pymunk/libload.py in the setup phase, since a) the directory is wrong on multiarch systems b) the unversioned .so file symlink is provided by chipmunk-devel. - You can drop BR: python-setuptools if you're not targetting EPEL. - I'd remove completely the chipmunk_src directory in %setup: rm -rf chipmunk_src/ - Add README.txt, LICENSE.txt, PKG-INFO and THANKS.txt to %doc. - Change %{python_sitelib}/* to %{python_sitelib}/%{name}/ %{python_sitelib}/%{name}-*.egg-info/ - Drop CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" from %build, as this is a noarch package. - Fix the newlines in %setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 11:16:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:16:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211116.n5LBGwrF029593@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 07:16:56 EDT --- - If you need to redefine the prefix and mandir then the makefile probably doesn't support DESTDIR, which should be fixed in the first place. - You don't need a patch to set the man page permissions, you can just chmod it after the install. (You can contact upstream about them, though.) - What happens if you don't use patch2? Doesn't -I work as well as -iquote..? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 11:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478429] Review Request: tinc - A virtual private network daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211120.n5LBKC8X016919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478429 --- Comment #8 from Felix Kaechele 2009-06-21 07:20:10 EDT --- Ping. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 11:31:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:31:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211131.n5LBVe2f018823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #44 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-21 07:31:37 EDT --- Now I have imported the source code to CVS repository and try to build it on koji. It is OK on dist-f11 and devel But not dist-f10. The reason is lack of BR:gtk2-devel I think. Should I add it into spec file? Build of perl-Goo-Canvas-0.06-2 on devel, dist-f11 and dist-f10 devel:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=111197 F-11:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=111201 F-10:http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=111202 In fact, there is no need to add BR: gtk2-devel on F-11 and devel. But if I do not add it, It will not build on F-10 successfully. So what should I do? add it directly? As I wish, after adding BR: gtk2-devel, it is successful on F-10 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1427450 I upgrade the SRPM and SPEC file SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas-0.06-3.fc11.src.rpm SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/perl-Goo-Canvas.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 11:49:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:49:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211149.n5LBn4al022015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 11:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 07:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211148.n5LBmPXa002825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 12:21:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:21:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211221.n5LCLKLY028397@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 08:21:19 EDT --- koji scratch build of 1.0-1 at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1427504 Changed -fno-exceptions to -DHAVE_STRICMP. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte-1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 12:40:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 08:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211240.n5LCeT13031610@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #2 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 08:40:28 EDT --- Don't ship the virtual console binary vefte. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 13:07:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:07:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211307.n5LD7Bfk017526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 09:07:10 EDT --- acheck-0.5.1-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/acheck-0.5.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 13:08:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:08:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211308.n5LD8Wq7004318@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 09:08:31 EDT --- acheck-0.5.1-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/acheck-0.5.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 13:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505507] Review Request: acheck - Check common localisation mistakes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211311.n5LDBHsQ005097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505507 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 13:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 09:53:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211353.n5LDrkQq013312@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-21 09:53:45 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mux Short Description: GTK+ widgets for moblin Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 14:06:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:06:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211406.n5LE61K0015729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-21 10:06:00 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1427658 SPEC: same link as before SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mojito-0.10.3-2.fc11.src.rpm Updated. Added NetworkManager as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 14:32:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:32:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211432.n5LEWWeN020522@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 10:32:31 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 14:34:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211434.n5LEYwgb001396@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-21 10:34:57 EDT --- > * The License field file matches the actual license: FAIL > The package license is GPLv2 and the spec states LGPLv2 I'd already fixed this locally but forgot to upload it. > * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: > FAIL > > Please look into this: > 961c0054fe2cd80be5721534981b144a BOGNOR_0_4_5.tar.bz2 > 98da8af1a9decb73904233d022169e9c bognor-regis-0.4.5.tar.bz2 That I suspect is due to the rename of the directory of the source within the tarball which was named the same as the tarball. I am going to file an upstream bug to get this fixed properly. SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/bognor-regis-0.4.5-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 14:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211446.n5LEknDs003891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 10:46:48 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 14:47:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 10:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211447.n5LElxbQ023487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #14 from Yaakov Nemoy 2009-06-21 10:47:57 EDT --- Blame Dolphin. This KDE switch hasn't been 100% smooth. I sent it up with SCP this time. Zach, let's comaintain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:05:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:05:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211505.n5LF5hRv007669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 11:05:43 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:09:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:09:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211509.n5LF9WDG027707@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 11:09:31 EDT --- perl-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211517.n5LFHnua029612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:19:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:19:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211519.n5LFJAvu029936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 11:19:10 EDT --- perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:18:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:18:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211518.n5LFI0i4029654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #2 from Robert Spanton 2009-06-21 11:18:00 EDT --- Cheers Jussi, I've done the changes you mention. There are a few things I'd like to query: - I can't find anything about patch naming in the packaging guidelines. - I think I do need python-setuptools as a BuildRequires, as setup.py requires it and it's not listed in the exception list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 Building without python-setuptools results in fail: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1427723&name=build.log - Why did you require me to make the change to %files, as the RPM ends up owning exactly the same files and directories? Updated spec: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec New SRPM: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.2-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211534.n5LFYRZS000403@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 11:34:26 EDT --- perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 15:56:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 11:56:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211556.n5LFu2Qh004903@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 11:56:01 EDT --- perl-p5-Palm-1.009-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-p5-Palm-1.009-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 16:05:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:05:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226210] Merge Review: opal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211605.n5LG5816006791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226210 --- Comment #23 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-21 12:05:05 EDT --- There's no prebuild binaries in either the opal or opal-devel package, they're used for the windows build so won't ever be used in the build process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 16:13:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:13:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211613.n5LGDu9W021025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 12:13:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > Cheers Jussi, > > I've done the changes you mention. There are a few things I'd like to query: > > - I can't find anything about patch naming in the packaging guidelines. This is an unwritten rule, which is really necessary if you have the sources of N packages in the SOURCES directory. If you don't have a reasonable naming system, there's no way to see what sources correspond to which package. This system of naming is implicit in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25prep_section:_.25patch_commands > - I think I do need python-setuptools as a BuildRequires, as setup.py requires > it and it's not listed in the exception list: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > Building without python-setuptools results in fail: > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1427723&name=build.log Oh okay, no problem then. > - Why did you require me to make the change to %files, as the RPM ends up > owning exactly the same files and directories? For a couple of reasons: clearness and picking up errors. For example if the egg-info is not produced in the build you won't pick it up if you're using wildcards. By specifying the two directories you will know if the build is incomplete. > > Updated spec: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec > New SRPM: > http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.2-2.fc11.src.rpm > > Thanks, > > Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 16:16:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:16:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211616.n5LGGaNh009352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 12:16:35 EDT --- The %doc files %doc LICENSE.txt PKG-INFO THANKS.txt README.txt should go into the main package, since they're small in size and essential for the package. [At least the license is.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 16:23:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:23:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211623.n5LGNBVp010577@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 --- Comment #45 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-21 12:23:08 EDT --- You can add "BR: gtk2-devel" only on F-10 branch. In that case please use "2%{?dist}.1" as release number of the spec file to make EVR (Epoch-Version-Release) path between F-10 -> F-11 work correctly: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 16:46:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:46:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211646.n5LGkP6V014696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #5 from Robert Spanton 2009-06-21 12:46:25 EDT --- Cool. Thanks for clarifying those points for me :-) I've moved those text files into the main package. Spec: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk.spec SRPM: http://users.ecs.soton.ac.uk/rds/rpm/pymunk/pymunk-0.8.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Thanks, Rob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 16:52:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 12:52:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211652.n5LGqw2f015906@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 Boris Kolpackov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |boris at codesynthesis.com --- Comment #7 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-06-21 12:52:56 EDT --- Here is a quote from the FSF page mentioned above: "Where's the line between two separate programs, and one program with two parts? This is a legal question, which ultimately judges will decide. We believe that a proper criterion depends both on the mechanism of communication (exec, pipes, rpc, function calls within a shared address space, etc.) and the semantics of the communication (what kinds of information are interchanged)." My point is that there is no communications between GPL and ASL licensed modules. But then the next paragraph states: "If the modules are included in the same executable file, they are definitely combined in one program. If modules are designed to run linked together in a shared address space, that almost surely means combining them into one program." So things are quite murky here and, I agree, it will be more straightforward to add an explicit allowance in the licensing conditions. However, instead of adding a provision just for Xerces-C++ or ASL, I will add a general provision that will allow combining the software in question with other incompatibly-licensed modules in a single program provided that there is no use of the functionality offered by the software by such modules. Here is the text that I will place into the LICENSE file (it is similar and is based on the wording from xsd): ------------------------------------------------------------------- This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for details. You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA In addition, as a special exception, Boris Kolpackov gives permission to combine this library with other incompatibly-licensed modules in a single program and to distribute such a combination provided that there is no use of the functionality implemented by this library, directly or indirectly, by such modules. You must obey the GNU General Public License version 2 in all respects for all of the code used other than such modules. In particular, the resulting program must be licensed under a license compatible with the GNU General Public License version 2. If you modify this copy of the library, you may extend this exception to your version of the library, but you are not obligated to do so. If you do not wish to do so, delete this exception statement from your version. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Let me know if you see any problems with this approach. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 17:14:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:14:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506429] Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211714.n5LHE1ri019723@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506429 Remi Collet changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at famillecollet.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 17:10:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:10:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507030] Review Request: pymunk - Python wrapper for the chipmunk 2D physics engine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211710.n5LHAhWu019144@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507030 --- Comment #6 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 13:10:42 EDT --- - You have to BuildRequires: chipmunk to get the filename of the library: ++ ls '/usr/lib64/libchipmunk.so.*' ++ head -n 1 ls: cannot access /usr/lib64/libchipmunk.so.*: No such file or directory (Don't BR: chipmunk-devel, since you only want the versioned so file. Make a comment about this.) - Remove the .so and .dll file from pymunk.egg-info/SOURCES.txt with the sharedlib patch and remove the files in %setup. Then you can drop # We use chipmunk's shared library, so get rid of the inbuilt version rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/%{python_sitelib}/pymunk/{chipmunk.dll,libchipmunk.so} from %install altogether, since nothing is installed. - If you want, you can use "python" instead of "%{__python}". (%{__python} evaluates to /usr/bin/python) - I'm not quite sure if there is a need to have a separate -doc package. After all: $ du -hc * 56K pymunk-0.8.2-3.fc11.noarch.rpm 72K pymunk-doc-0.8.2-3.fc11.noarch.rpm 128K total IMHO 72k is not worthwhile to separate from the main package. - Examples contain pymunx which is under GPL+ license, this needs to be reflected in the license tag of the package this file is in. If you want to go with a separate -doc package, its license should be "MIT and GPL+", with the main package having MIT license. Otherwise this must be the license of the main package. Once you have fixed these I will do the full review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 17:13:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:13:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506429] Review Request: eclipse-eclox - Eclipse-based doxygen plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211713.n5LHDeUR031586@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506429 --- Comment #1 from Remi Collet 2009-06-21 13:13:39 EDT --- - Is there a reason to package a SVN version rather than the official 0.8.0 ? (not a problem, just to know) - Better URL seems to be http://eclox.eu/ - According to source file (eclox.core/src/eclox/core/Plugin.java p.e.) License is GPLv2+ - AUTHORS, CHANGES, COPYING, MANUAL, README and TODO still present despite of eclipse-eclox-bin_excludes.patch. - It will be usefull to add them in %doc (perhaps, even with the full version download in your script eclipse-eclox-download.sh) - Build and load ok (not really tested yet) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 17:19:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211719.n5LHJ6H5020791@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-21 13:19:04 EDT --- Well, I think changing the license to LGPLv2+ will do what you want in more simple way. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 17:42:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 13:42:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211742.n5LHg811025094@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel 2009-06-21 13:42:07 EDT --- Fixed the missing BRs: avahi-devel gtk2-devel gettext It now has translations (de) and gtk subpackage for gtk widgets. http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libinfinity/libinfinity.spec http://benboeckel.net/packaging/libinfinity/libinfinity-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint output: % rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-11-kde43-x86_64/result/*.rpm infinoted.x86_64: W: no-documentation libinfinity-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation libinfinity-gtk.x86_64: W: no-documentation libinfinity-gtk-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 18:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211801.n5LI1Cki007824@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #7 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-21 14:01:11 EDT --- Hello Jussi! Thank you for your comments. "- If you need to redefine the prefix and mandir then the makefile probably doesn't support DESTDIR, which should be fixed in the first place." It does support DESTDIR, but sets PREFIX to /usr/local. Here is a snippet from the unpatched makefile: install: $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin $(INSTALLBIN) $(PROG) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/$(PROG) $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1 $(INSTALLMAN) $(PROG).1 $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1/$(PROG).1 So I think this patch is necessary to insert $MANDIR in the relevant places and then PREFIX and MANDIR can be defined at make install. The spec uses DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT too. "- You don't need a patch to set the man page permissions, you can just chmod it after the install. (You can contact upstream about them, though.)" That patch also removes some ownership bits as well: PREFIX?= /usr/local INSTALLDIR= install -d -INSTALLBIN= install -g bin -o root -m 555 -INSTALLMAN= install -g bin -o root -m 444 +INSTALLBIN= install -p +INSTALLMAN= install -p -m 644 Perhaps the patch should remove the ownership/permission bits entirely and like you say I can chmod the man page to 644 -- I guess I would do that in %files? "- What happens if you don't use patch2? Doesn't -I work as well as -iquote..?" It fails to build in i386 and PPC. Some other distributions make the same kind of patch (Arch Linux and Debian, IIRC). Thanks again for the review and comments. I greatly appreciate it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 18:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211808.n5LI80FO029696@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-21 14:07:59 EDT --- Well, * Misc cosmetic issue ------------------------------------------------ BuildRequires: bouncycastle == %{version} Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} ------------------------------------------------ - Choose "==" or "=" (I think using "=" instead of "==" is more common) ! BR/Requires - bouncycastle-mail already has "R: bouncycastle = 1.43" and "R/BR: bouncycastle = 1.43" is redundant (however I won't oppose to write this explicitly) No review blockers ----------------------------------------------------------- This package (bouncycastle-tsp) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 18:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211814.n5LIE9Sq010104@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-21 14:14:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > Hello Jussi! Thank you for your comments. > > "- If you need to redefine the prefix and mandir then the makefile probably > doesn't support DESTDIR, which should be fixed in the first place." > > It does support DESTDIR, but sets PREFIX to /usr/local. Here is a snippet from > the unpatched makefile: Right. This program doesn't use autotools and thus the prefix is not set by %configure. OK. > install: > $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin > $(INSTALLBIN) $(PROG) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/$(PROG) > $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1 > $(INSTALLMAN) $(PROG).1 $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1/$(PROG).1 > > So I think this patch is necessary to insert $MANDIR in the relevant places and > then PREFIX and MANDIR can be defined at make install. The spec uses > DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT too. Yes, also the man should go to $(PREFIX)/share/man/man1/ instead of $(PREFIX)/man/man1. > "- You don't need a patch to set the man page permissions, you can just chmod > it > after the install. (You can contact upstream about them, though.)" > > That patch also removes some ownership bits as well: > > PREFIX?= /usr/local > INSTALLDIR= install -d > -INSTALLBIN= install -g bin -o root -m 555 > -INSTALLMAN= install -g bin -o root -m 444 > +INSTALLBIN= install -p > +INSTALLMAN= install -p -m 644 > > Perhaps the patch should remove the ownership/permission bits entirely and like > you say I can chmod the man page to 644 -- I guess I would do that in %files? You should be able to override these with make install PREFIX=%{_prefix} MANDIR=%{_mandir} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALLBIN="install -p -m 755" INSTALLMAN="install -p -m 644" instead of patching. But yes, the install command shouldn't specify a user or a group. > "- What happens if you don't use patch2? Doesn't -I work as well as -iquote..?" > > It fails to build in i386 and PPC. Some other distributions make the same kind > of patch (Arch Linux and Debian, IIRC). Interesting. You saw this with a koji scratch build? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 18:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211821.n5LILWIN011627@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 --- Comment #18 from Toshio Kuratomi 2009-06-21 14:21:31 EDT --- Spot's been on vacation for much of June. I believe that he's not on vacation anymore but he is still traveling -- FUDCon and LinuxTAG. My recommendation is that you either finish this review so everything but FE-LEGAL is fixed since you'll have to wait until he gets back from there before he can speak to the legal department about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 18:23:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504707] Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211823.n5LIN7eK032369@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-21 14:23:06 EDT --- Thanks! (In reply to comment #1) > * I think the .js files that go to the %doc package are licensed under MIT. Actually you're correct. I will reflect your comments. --------------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-locale_rails Short Description: Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 18:33:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 14:33:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211833.n5LIXMk4001702@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 --- Comment #6 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-21 14:33:21 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [OK] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [--] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:22:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:22:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211922.n5LJMROb010630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507223 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] New: Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Summary: Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506721 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/dalston-0.0.25-1.fc11.src.rpm System information icons for Moblin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:26:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:26:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211926.n5LJQHMT023306@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #5 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-21 15:26:16 EDT --- Wesley, the spec file is of course just named audex.spec. I added the "-1" to distinguish the different versions while the spec file evolves through the review process. Anyway, here are the new files: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex-0.71b3-2.fc10.src.rpm I've fixed the language thing, fixed the summary and the spec file name (see above). I can't fix the translation because upstream doesn't provide a proper description right now. But I will ask for it once I see the developer next time. That might take some time, though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:29:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:29:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211929.n5LJTnFu023691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21 15:29:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the > license oflb not ofl, sorry for the typo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211931.n5LJV8GZ024224@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-21 15:31:07 EDT --- Thanks a lot. I will clean those up. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bouncycastle-tsp Short Description: TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:29:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:29:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211929.n5LJTFpY023613@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #6 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-21 15:29:14 EDT --- 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the license 2. you should tell upstream the fullname of the regular font is "NotCourier" not "NotCourierSans", this is likely to confuse a few apps 2. if the font is monospace (as a Nimbus Mono is likely to be) the right fontconfig family is probably mono 3. "This is a new release of the NotCourier-sans, with its bold. The OSP frog, the "IJ","ij", numero and trademark ligatures are now encoded in the discretionary ligatures. " that seems release-specific. Probably not a good idea to include it in the summary 4. I'd have named the font at lease notcourier-sans, since notcouriersans is a bit long, but that's a personal preference Only the first point is a blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:34:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:34:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211934.n5LJY6bv012486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-21 15:34:05 EDT --- For -3: * Macros consistency - Well, if you want to use %{__cat} or %{__sed} style, please use %{__make}, %{__rm} for consistency. * Timestamps - Would you consider to use --------------------------------------------------------------- make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" --------------------------------------------------------------- for example to keep timestamps on installed files? * Misc issue --------------------------------------------------------------- %files devel %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc --------------------------------------------------------------- - Empty %doc line is unneeded. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906211935.n5LJZ4MJ025020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 19:55:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:55:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507224] New: Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 Summary: Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/connman.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/connman-0.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Connection Manager provides a daemon for managing Internet connections within embedded devices running the Linux operating system. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 20:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212002.n5LK2nhn017573@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 --- Comment #3 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-21 16:02:48 EDT --- Hi, I think the README will have to marked as %doc somehow and not end up in /usr/share/doc/hdapsd/ I would rm the $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/doc/hdapsd/README file after it was created by the make install and then add the README direct from the source tree with %doc README. rpmlint works fine. Something else to do whilst waiting for a package reviewer submit it as a scratch build to to koji. Start by getting an account and proceed onto Koji. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join#Get_a_Fedora_Account Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 20:08:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:08:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212008.n5LK8TfI018615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-21 16:08:28 EDT --- * Macros consistency - Fixed (__command style used) * Timestamps - Fixed (install -p used) * Misc - Fixed (doc line removed from devel package) Updated Spec: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle.spec Updated SRPM: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/libpuzzle/libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 20:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 16:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212041.n5LKfcUH024656@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-21 16:41:37 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 21:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212119.n5LLJj7F031832@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #9 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-21 17:19:44 EDT --- About man going (In reply to comment #8) > > install: > > $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin > > $(INSTALLBIN) $(PROG) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/$(PROG) > > $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1 > > $(INSTALLMAN) $(PROG).1 $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1/$(PROG).1 > > > > So I think this patch is necessary to insert $MANDIR in the relevant places and > > then PREFIX and MANDIR can be defined at make install. The spec uses > > DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT too. > > Yes, also the man should go to $(PREFIX)/share/man/man1/ instead of > $(PREFIX)/man/man1. Yes, the fixmanpagedir patch does this: diff -up tmux-0.8/GNUmakefile.fixmanpagedir tmux-0.8/GNUmakefile --- tmux-0.8/GNUmakefile.fixmanpagedir 2009-06-15 21:30:09.000000000 -0400 +++ tmux-0.8/GNUmakefile 2009-06-15 21:30:47.000000000 -0400 @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ LDFLAGS+= LIBS+= -lncurses PREFIX?= /usr/local +MANDIR?= ${PREFIX}/man INSTALLDIR= install -d INSTALLBIN= install -p INSTALLMAN= install -p -m 644 @@ -137,8 +138,8 @@ depend: $(SRCS) install: $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin $(INSTALLBIN) $(PROG) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/bin/$(PROG) - $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1 - $(INSTALLMAN) $(PROG).1 $(DESTDIR)$(PREFIX)/man/man1/$(PROG).1 + $(INSTALLDIR) $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/man1 + $(INSTALLMAN) $(PROG).1 $(DESTDIR)$(MANDIR)/man1/$(PROG).1 clean: rm -f $(CLEANFILES) This does not change the default upstream locations allows passing MANDIR at make install. > You should be able to override these with > make install PREFIX=%{_prefix} MANDIR=%{_mandir} DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT > INSTALLBIN="install -p -m 755" INSTALLMAN="install -p -m 644" > instead of patching. But yes, the install command shouldn't specify a user or a > group. > Okay, I can try that instead. Thanks! > > "- What happens if you don't use patch2? Doesn't -I work as well as -iquote..?" > > > > It fails to build in i386 and PPC. Some other distributions make the same kind > > of patch (Arch Linux and Debian, IIRC). > > Interesting. You saw this with a koji scratch build? Yep: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1416014 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 21:28:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:28:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507224] Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212128.n5LLSrYD001207@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507236 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 21:28:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:28:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507236] New: Review Request: connman-gnome - GNOME GUI for the Connmann connection manager Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: connman-gnome - GNOME GUI for the Connmann connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507236 Summary: Review Request: connman-gnome - GNOME GUI for the Connmann connection manager Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 507224 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/connman-gnome.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/connman-gnome-0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm GNOME GUI for the Connmann connection manager -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 21:48:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:48:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212148.n5LLm7So016457@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(byron at theclarkfam | |ily.name) --- Comment #6 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-21 17:48:05 EDT --- when building: Makefile:19: config.mk: No such file or directory rpmlint is complaining newsbeuter.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.20-5 ['2.0-5.fc11', '2.0-5'] newsbeuter.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/podbeuter.1.gz newsbeuter.i586: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/man/man1/newsbeuter.1.gz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 21:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507224] Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212150.n5LLovt9005367@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507240 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 21:50:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:50:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507240] New: Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507240 Summary: Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 507224 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gconnman.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gconnman-0.1.15-1.fc11.src.rpm The glib bindings for connman -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507224] Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212200.n5LM0d4K018801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:00:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507240] Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212200.n5LM0dmL018817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507240 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:00:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:00:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212200.n5LM0clS018784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507243 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:00:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:00:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507243] New: Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507243 Summary: Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506721,507224,507240 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/carrick.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/carrick-0.0.8-1.fc11.src.rpm Carrick is a connection management panel for Moblin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:05:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:05:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507071] Review Request: libqinfinity - In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212205.n5LM5BN2019863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507071 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |gr33nn1nj4 at gr33nn1nj4.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:28:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:28:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212228.n5LMS5kR023638@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) --- Comment #14 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-21 18:28:03 EDT --- 1] why do you have download_version different from Version? from specfile: %define download_version 0.70 Name: shutter Version: 0.70.2 Why don't use Version instead of download_version? 2] in %install you are creating directory named "0755" in bin/ and share/ 3] after install you have following directories in /usr/share/shutter/resources: pofiles: tar.gz-ed files from application, why do you need them here? modules: File, Proc perl modules, as they mostly have separate packages (except File::Spec and Proc::Simple which is still present in codes and seems that it is required in case that you want to cancel operation), you have to use packaged version of them. Please create packages for missing dependencies (File::Spec and Proc::Simple). Koji build isn't only one thing which is required before package is approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 22:49:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 18:49:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505928] Review Request: hdapsd - Protects hard drives by parking head when fall is detected In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212249.n5LMn2Yv026923@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505928 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 23:21:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:21:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212321.n5LNLAnM000675@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-21 19:21:09 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc11.1 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc11.1 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 23:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494726] Review Request: Gnote - Note Taking Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212337.n5LNbQsr003333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494726 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #25 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-21 19:37:24 EDT --- Gnote 0.5 is in Fedora 10 and 11 but the update system did not catch this. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 21 23:52:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 19:52:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906212352.n5LNqrWu026021@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 01:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507259] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220135.n5M1ZXJ4024448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507259 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 01:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507259] New: Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507259 Summary: Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm Description: This is a Wordpress MU plugin that will allow you to set various defaults for new blogs, such as theme, title, etc. This package does not come from wordpress.org so I did not follow the section about naming it based on the shortname from wordpress.org (I spoke to ianweller, the author of the wordpress plugin guidelines and he said to mention this) This is my first package and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 01:39:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:39:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507259] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220139.n5M1dAOd013389@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507259 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 01:39:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:39:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507259] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220139.n5M1d1qJ013351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507259 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DEFERRED --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-06-21 21:39:00 EDT --- I am withdrawing this request, will resubmit with corrected information. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 01:56:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:56:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220156.n5M1u7tb028172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nb at fedoraproject.org Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 01:55:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 21:55:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: nb at fedoraproject.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults.spec SRPM URL: http://nb.fedorapeople.org/wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults-1.2.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package allows you to set various defaults to automatically apply to new blogs, such as the default theme, etc. This package is built for use with WordPress MU (wordpress-mu), not regular WordPress. This is not found from wordpress.org so I did not follow the normal wordpress packaging guidelines regarding the name. I spoke to Ian Weller (the author of those guidelines) on IRC and he said just to make a comment in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 02:31:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:31:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220231.n5M2VE26002977@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 Nick Bebout changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request:
- |s - WordPress MU Plugin to | |set new blog default | |settings --- Comment #1 from Nick Bebout 2009-06-21 22:31:14 EDT --- This is my first request and I am looking for a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 04:00:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:00:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220400.n5M40WCH019451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #10 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-22 00:00:31 EDT --- Updated Spec and SRPM: Spec URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux.spec SRPM URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux-0.8-3.fc11.src.rpm I removed the 'fixperms' patch and instead set ownership and permissions at make install stage per Jussi's suggestion. I also bumped version to 3 and updated the changelog. I checked rpmlint -i on the spec, RPM, and SRPM and had no warnings or errors. I also built in mock with f11-x86_64 and f11-i386 chroot with no errors. Finally, I tested this updated release on koji and it appears to build fine: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428109 Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 04:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220424.n5M4OXxN024145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-22 00:24:32 EDT --- The package is not using the Fedora optimization flags (available through %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS). You need to patch the makefile to get these into use. Keep the -D and -I and the -std switches, remove everything else (as the -W switches). You don't need to touch the libs. - Add LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the end of the make command to use the optimization flags in the linking process too (if the object files have been compiled e.g. with -fPIC then linking will fail without it). - Instead of examples/* I'd ship examples/ since this is a bit clearer. - Add TODO to %doc. I can sponsor you, if you first show me that you know the guidelines. To do that you need to read the Packaging and the Review Guidelines and to demonstrate you understand them by making at least one another submission and do a couple of informal reviews of other people's packages (you'll be able to do formal ones once I have sponsored you). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 04:34:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 00:34:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220434.n5M4Y2BQ025938@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #9 from Panu Matilainen 2009-06-22 00:34:00 EDT --- Sure, that'd work too, it just a) requires changes to existing packages to all supported versions b) replaces functionality of stable lzma with a beta version The "only the xz bits" variant from comment #7 allows dropping it with minimal fuss. I dont have any strong feelings about it either way though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504749] Review Request: perl-Catalyst-View-PDF-Reuse - Create PDF files from Catalyst using Template Toolkit templates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220508.n5M58phH020636@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504749 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-22 01:08:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:16:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:16:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498906] Review Request: gnome-format - GNOME tool to easily format USB sticks or SD/MMC flash cards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220516.n5M5G21Q022151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498906 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-22 01:16:01 EDT --- Upstream declared this software dead soon after I submitted the review and I don't see much of a point in going through the review process now just for a single release. I am closing this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:21:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:21:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220521.n5M5L9rl002932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Liang Suilong changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(liangsuilong at gmai | |l.com) | --- Comment #15 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-22 01:21:08 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > 1] why do you have download_version different from Version? > from specfile: > %define download_version 0.70 > Name: shutter > Version: 0.70.2 > Why don't use Version instead of download_version? The real version is 0.70.2, but the tarball of source code which author provides is shutter-0.70. I do not know why the author do it. Maybe we should contract with author and persuade him to correct the version. > 2] in %install you are creating directory named "0755" in bin/ and share/ Are there any problems? I think it is OK for us. > 3] after install you have following directories in > /usr/share/shutter/resources: > pofiles: tar.gz-ed files from application, why do you need them here? > modules: File, Proc perl modules, as they mostly have separate packages (except > File::Spec and Proc::Simple which is still present in codes and seems that it > is required in case that you want to cancel operation), you have to use > packaged version of them. > Please create packages for missing dependencies (File::Spec and Proc::Simple). > > Koji build isn't only one thing which is required before package is approved. In my opinion, these directories in /usr/share/shutter/resources: 1. pofiles: maybe they should be remove. Let me have a try! If it is OK, I will remove them. 2. modules: It is not a good choice to remove them as I see. If we remove them, we will need to create packages for (File::Spec and Proc::Simple). If (File::Spec and Proc::Simple) upgrade to new version, it will be not compatible with shutter. So I think we should use the perl module which author offers. Just like some linux software with static libraries, It can provide the best compatibility with their software. Yes, I know koji build is an important thing which is require before package is approved, but not the only one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:47:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220547.n5M5lSoK008045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 01:47:26 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428526 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 21689ad7d921f83a012e354d0f8563a6bee653c0 GFS_DECKER.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220547.n5M5lm6x008106@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 01:47:47 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428601 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url c6da481a25176411fa4bcfd6964d6230056bd5dd GFS_PYRSOS.zip + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + fonts scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:45:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:45:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220545.n5M5jK7s007716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 01:45:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428528 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url fc1d6b39ed842369170a8752ee6b73d99d49a9fc CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=14, Tests=128, 2 wallclock secs ( 0.10 usr 0.01 sys + 1.98 cusr 0.10 csys = 2.19 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Session) = 1.03 Requires: perl(CGI::Application) >= 3.21 perl(CGI::Session) perl(Carp) perl(Exporter) perl(File::Spec) perl(Scalar::Util) perl(strict) perl(vars) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 05:45:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 01:45:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220545.n5M5jAKf007591@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 01:45:09 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428530 - rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.06-1 ['2.10-1.fc12', '2.10-1'] ==> fix this + source files match upstream url 78cca2cefe005f59c440a362c4cbeeaa12cf115b CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=3, Tests=16, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.01 usr 0.02 sys + 0.30 cusr 0.04 csys = 0.37 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Plugin::Stream) = 2.10 Requires: perl >= 0:5.006 perl(CGI::Application) >= 3.21 perl(Exporter) perl(File::Basename) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Fix changelog entry before cvs import. 2) You need to Requires: perl(File::MMagic), not picked up by yum. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:03:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:03:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220603.n5M63aAC031176@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 02:03:35 EDT --- Awesome lighting-fast review, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-pyrsos-fonts Short Description: GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220605.n5M657OW031674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 02:05:06 EDT --- Awesome lighting-fast review++, thanks! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: gfs-decker-fonts Short Description: GFS Decker Greek fonts Owners: nim Branches: F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220606.n5M66huA032030@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #16 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-22 02:06:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > (In reply to comment #14) > > 1] why do you have download_version different from Version? > > from specfile: > > %define download_version 0.70 > > Name: shutter > > Version: 0.70.2 > > Why don't use Version instead of download_version? > > The real version is 0.70.2, but the tarball of source code which author > provides is shutter-0.70. I do not know why the author do it. Maybe we should > contract with author and persuade him to correct the version. > Upstream provides 0.70.2 ( http://shutter-project.org/wp-content/uploads/releases/tars/ ) > > 2] in %install you are creating directory named "0755" in bin/ and share/ > > Are there any problems? I think it is OK for us. > install command create this directories, please fix your %install section. There is no reason to create them at first place. > 2. modules: It is not a good choice to remove them as I see. If we remove them, > we will need to create packages for (File::Spec and Proc::Simple). If > (File::Spec and Proc::Simple) upgrade to new version, it will be not compatible > with shutter. So I think we should use the perl module which author offers. > Just like some linux software with static libraries, It can provide the best > compatibility with their software. It is much wise choice to have them as separate packages. It will provide much more benefit to fedora. And as per my opinion it breaks following rule: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries I could very hardly imagine that next release of File::Spec and Proc::Simple will be non-compatible with shutter. We could require specific version of File::Spec or Proc::Simple packages. It is same as for Perl-Goo-Canvas or Perl-Gnome2-Wnck. I have started creating package of File::Spec and Proc::Simple and will submit them during today to help you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 06:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 02:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220657.n5M6v4Kc021451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #17 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-22 02:57:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > 1] why do you have download_version different from Version? > > > from specfile: > > > %define download_version 0.70 > > > Name: shutter > > > Version: 0.70.2 > > > Why don't use Version instead of download_version? > > > > The real version is 0.70.2, but the tarball of source code which author > > provides is shutter-0.70. I do not know why the author do it. Maybe we should > > contract with author and persuade him to correct the version. > > > > Upstream provides 0.70.2 ( > http://shutter-project.org/wp-content/uploads/releases/tars/ ) OK? I know I am wrong. Thank you for your notification. > > > 2] in %install you are creating directory named "0755" in bin/ and share/ > > > > Are there any problems? I think it is OK for us. > > > install command create this directories, please fix your %install section. > There is no reason to create them at first place. That is a good idea! > > 2. modules: It is not a good choice to remove them as I see. If we remove them, > > we will need to create packages for (File::Spec and Proc::Simple). If > > (File::Spec and Proc::Simple) upgrade to new version, it will be not compatible > > with shutter. So I think we should use the perl module which author offers. > > Just like some linux software with static libraries, It can provide the best > > compatibility with their software. > > It is much wise choice to have them as separate packages. It will provide much > more benefit to fedora. And as per my opinion it breaks following rule: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries > > I could very hardly imagine that next release of File::Spec and Proc::Simple > will be non-compatible with shutter. We could require specific version of > File::Spec or Proc::Simple packages. > It is same as for Perl-Goo-Canvas or Perl-Gnome2-Wnck. > > I have started creating package of File::Spec and Proc::Simple and will submit > them during today to help you. Yes. thank you too. So I need to remove /usr/share/shutter/resources/module/File and /usr/share/shutter/resources/module/Proc. But I think that /usr/share/shutter/resources/module/Shutter should not be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507243] Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220816.n5M8GEnp008172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507243 Bug 507243 depends on bug 507240, which changed state. Bug 507240 Summary: Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507240 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507240] Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220816.n5M8GCYe008121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507240 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 04:16:11 EDT --- Closing. Will use network-manager-netbook so a to be able to use all the exisiting awesomeness of NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:15:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:15:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507240] Review Request: gconnman - The glib bindings for connman In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220815.n5M8Fq20026071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507240 Bug 507240 depends on bug 507224, which changed state. Bug 507224 Summary: Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:15:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:15:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507243] Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220815.n5M8FrE3026091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507243 Bug 507243 depends on bug 507224, which changed state. Bug 507224 Summary: Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:15:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:15:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507236] Review Request: connman-gnome - GNOME GUI for the Connmann connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220815.n5M8FpGo026046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507236 Bug 507236 depends on bug 507224, which changed state. Bug 507224 Summary: Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:15:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:15:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507224] Review Request: connman - Moblin connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220815.n5M8Fm9I025995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507224 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 04:15:47 EDT --- Closing. Will use network-manager-netbook so a to be able to use all the exisiting awesomeness of NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507236] Review Request: connman-gnome - GNOME GUI for the Connmann connection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220816.n5M8G13R026135@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507236 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 04:16:00 EDT --- Closing. Will use network-manager-netbook so a to be able to use all the exisiting awesomeness of NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:16:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:16:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507243] Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220816.n5M8GNOc026322@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507243 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #1 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 04:16:22 EDT --- Closing. Will use network-manager-netbook so a to be able to use all the exisiting awesomeness of NM -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:20:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220820.n5M8KZ3H009385@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #10 from Jindrich Novy 2009-06-22 04:20:32 EDT --- The best solution seems to be to add lzma-compat package where all the lzma stuff from xz is shipped. It doesn't need any modifications on lzma side. Adding Obsoletes/Provides to the compat package just obsoletes lzma, not lzma-libs or lzma-devel so all dependencies on liblzmadec are kept. Check out the new packages: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/xz.spec http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/xz/xz-4.999.8-0.5beta.fc11.src.rpm Asked upstream about the lzmainfo: 18:33 < jnovy> Larhzu: Hi Lasse, is it intentional that lzmainfo equivalent is missing from xz? 18:35 < Larhzu> jnovy: For now, yes, but there will be "xz --list" like gzip has, and I guess I can add lzmainfo for backward compatibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220854.n5M8smEF004174@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507299 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] New: Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Summary: Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 506780 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/network-manager-netbook-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/network-manager-netbook.spec network-manager-netbook is a connection management panel for Moblin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 08:58:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 04:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220858.n5M8w14h004993@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 04:58:00 EDT --- aha. So you got finally good connection manager. I am actually looking for information like if I want to review this, then do I need to test it on moblin? Do I need to actually build and run moblin packages on actual moblin system? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 09:02:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:02:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220902.n5M924Wc019154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #2 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 05:02:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > aha. So you got finally good connection manager. I am actually looking for > information like if I want to review this, then do I need to test it on moblin? > Do I need to actually build and run moblin packages on actual moblin system? It won't actually build on rawhide at the moment as it depends on other moblin packages. I'm not sure what your asking here though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 09:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:07:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220907.n5M971AK007227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-22 05:07:00 EDT --- I saw that there are custom builds from fedora packages for moblin. So, It looks I can't directly build and use moblin packages on Fedora releases. Is there any page on Fedora wiki that describes how reviewers should review moblin packages? But from your reply it seems I need actual moblin system to test/review moblin packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 09:17:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:17:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220917.n5M9HCNu009661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 05:17:11 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > I saw that there are custom builds from fedora packages for moblin. So, It > looks I can't directly build and use moblin packages on Fedora releases. Is > there any page on Fedora wiki that describes how reviewers should review moblin > packages? > > But from your reply it seems I need actual moblin system to test/review moblin > packages. No. I'm slowly creating the moblin packages for Fedora. They will only work on rawhide. So you need to wait for the dependencies to hit rawhide before you can test them. The package review is to ensure that the packaging meets the Fedora requirements. Hopefully later in the F12 rawhide release cycle once I have everything built in rawhide there will be test images to test the entire stack. Its too early for that though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 09:43:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:43:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220943.n5M9hB85015857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 09:43:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:43:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220943.n5M9h1H5015828@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 09:42:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906220942.n5M9g7j5015708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lxtnow at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lxtnow at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 10:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221019.n5MAJj6a023026@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-22 06:19:43 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > 1. the prefix for Open Font LiBrary is oflbn not ofl (to distinguish with the > license > - changed > 2. you should tell upstream the fullname of the regular font is "NotCourier" > not "NotCourierSans", this is likely to confuse a few apps > - I tried contacting upstream, their contact link does not work (right now) > 2. if the font is monospace (as a Nimbus Mono is likely to be) the right > fontconfig family is probably mono > - I had kept it as a sans-serif because the tags on the home page were : tags: media, font, OFL, graphic, otf, image, png, archive, zip, **sans_serif**, courier, rugular, bold Anyway, you're a better judge at that. > 3. "This is a new release of the NotCourier-sans, with its bold. The OSP frog, > the "IJ","ij", numero and trademark ligatures are now encoded in the > discretionary ligatures. " that seems release-specific. Probably not a good > idea to include it in the summary > - removed > 4. I'd have named the font at lease notcourier-sans, since notcouriersans is a > bit long, but that's a personal preference > Wouldn't notcourier-sans sound as if its a sans and not mono? I think the name the upstream's given is "notcouriersans". Anyway, I'm unable to contact them to clarify. > Only the first point is a blocker ah, great .. rebuilding.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 10:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221033.n5MAXOIa026352@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #79 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-22 06:33:12 EDT --- Ken Crandall, If you are submitting it for review, please provide the spec file and srpm instead of a patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 10:57:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:57:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221057.n5MAv5UF031371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #55 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti 2009-06-22 06:57:02 EDT --- The source code for 2.49a seems not to be available yet: http://www.blender.org/download/source-code/ I have installed F11 on an Intel N270 Atom netbook, and blender 2.49/yafaray is running just fine. The graphics card is: "Mobile 945GME Express Integrated Graphics Controller". Unfortunately, I do not have any ATI card to try, but I would suggest that you delete the contents of ~/.blender/scripts and restart blender so the symlinks are recreated. I also had the selinux denial because of the text relocation and this has to be fixed. However, selinux gave so much trouble that I had to disable it again. Regarding the location of the scripts/.so, I think I have to follow what the Fedora blender maintainer recommends. Yafaray has to be integrated into blender and Jochen has to agree with the location of the files. If you convince him, I can change the installation once more (I have no problem with that). Yafaray installation is very "loose", and they still have just a zip file for Ubuntu with the scripts to be uncompressed manually. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 10:59:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 06:59:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221059.n5MAx05U011601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #9 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 06:58:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > (In reply to comment #6) > - I had kept it as a sans-serif because the tags on the home page were : > > tags: media, font, OFL, graphic, otf, image, png, archive, zip, **sans_serif**, > courier, rugular, bold > > Anyway, you're a better judge at that. A font can be monospace and serif or sans-serif. They're two different ways to classify the font (monospace is about having the same size for all letters, sans-serif/serif is about having squiggles at the end of bars). However monospace is usually seen as "more specific", so it takes precedence https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Shipping_fonts_in_Fedora_(FAQ)#What_fontconfig_generic_family_should_I_put_my_font_in.3F -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 11:01:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:01:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221101.n5MB1IcE032256@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-22 07:01:17 EDT --- Notes: * Current naming scheme looks unclear at least for me. Why not to split packages into %{name}-MySQL, %{name}-ODBC and %{name}-ZIP instead of %{name}-extra. * I don't fully understand why we need specific %{name}-debug package. We already have %{name}-debuginfo. In any case I think %{name}-debug should be splitted into %{name}-debug and %{name}-extra-debug packages (in conformance with main two packages). However, I don't insist you to fully satisfy these two requests, but you should comment them. * "BuildRequires: /usr/bin/perl" - why not to use "BuildRequires: perl" ? Other things looks sane. Here is a koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1429077 * rpmlint is almost silent (two warnings may be ignored): [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint poco-* poco-debug.i586: W: no-documentation poco-extra.i586: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 11:24:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:24:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221124.n5MBOUPJ006456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lemenkov at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-22 07:24:29 EDT --- I'll review it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 11:39:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:39:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504152] Review Request: perl-Pod-Abstract - Abstract document tree for Perl POD documents In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221139.n5MBd0LM022193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504152 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 11:44:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 07:44:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221144.n5MBiRR8023393@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #10 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-22 07:44:26 EDT --- hi, src rpm http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts-1.1-1.fc12.src.rpm spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts/oflb-notcouriersans-fonts.spec regards, Ankur -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 12:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500959] Review Request: perl-Task-Padre-Plugin-Deps - Task::Padre::Plugin::Deps Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221200.n5MC03OH014399@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500959 Marcela Maslanova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #4 from Marcela Maslanova 2009-06-22 08:00:01 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1429237&name=build.log Wx::Perl::DataWalker .../usr/bin/perl: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/ppc-linux-thread-multi/auto/Wx/Wx.so: undefined symbol: Perl_Guse_safe_putenv_ptr This could be (maybe) fixed with update of threads in perl core. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 12:32:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:32:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221232.n5MCWkER003428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-22 08:32:45 EDT --- Some notes: * As I already said - versioning is bad. See above. * COPYRIGHTS, GNU_GPL_v2, GNU_LGPL_v2 should be added to %doc Please, update your srpm. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 13:14:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:14:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221314.n5MDEYTo015374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #80 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-06-22 09:14:30 EDT --- 0.9.12-5 still works on F10. I haven't tested Ken's patch in F10 since I ended up doing an in-situ upgrade to F11 (not my favorite process ... but it seems to work OK). I have put together the SRPM and spec files for Fedora 11 based on applying Ken's patch: I'm posting the x86_64 RPMs first. 32 bit RPMs out shortly. Follow instructions in http://www.linux.com.sg/projects/47-slab-0-9-12-6-fc11.html The x86_64 RPMs for Fedora 11: http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora11/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-6/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora11/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-6/gnome-main-menu-debuginfo-0.9.12-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora11/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-6/gnome-main-menu-devel-0.9.12-6.fc11.x86_64.rpm For the more technically inclined: http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora11/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-6/gnome-main-menu.spec http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora11/gnome-main-menu-0.9.12-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 13:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221318.n5MDIXwX018274@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #82 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-06-22 09:18:31 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348890) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348890) SPEC file for Fedora 11 to build gnome-main-menu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 13:17:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:17:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221317.n5MDH68I017867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #81 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-06-22 09:17:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=348889) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=348889) FC11 src rpm Here's the src rpm that builds for Fedora 11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 13:35:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:35:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221335.n5MDZePf028463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #10 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-22 09:35:39 EDT --- OK, I see now. I would disagree here, and would argue the best place for ownership of %_libdir/virtuoso is in the main package. Currently, both -apps and -conductor use this, and they don't depend on each other, and I don't consider it a better solution to have each of them own it. Further, it's safer to have the main pkg own this, in case there are ever more pkgs (subpkgs of this one, or others) that need drop stuff in there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:24:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:24:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221424.n5MEOFSG005374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Overholt 2009-06-22 10:24:13 EDT --- Apologies, Mat, I haven't had a chance to look at this. I'll try to do it this week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:31:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:31:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221431.n5MEV3b8007978@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 --- Comment #7 from Denys Vlasenko 2009-06-22 10:31:01 EDT --- Re static linking: busybox is a rescue package thing. It is useful when dynamic libraries are busted (think rm -rf /lib). Also, busybox is used when it's critical to minimize the size. glibc really is not caring about code size anymore. I don't know where exactly busybox is used in Fedora, but in above two cases people usually use statically linked busybox. Re static linking to another C library: uclibc can be configured and built as a dynamic library. What is the Fedora policy on this? Are alternative libc's allowed? BTW, in effect we already have two libc's on x86_64: 32-bit and 64-bit glibc have different ABIs and live in different directories. Adding more libc's boils down to selecting a directory for them (I don't know, /lib-i[456]86-uclibc?) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221437.n5MEbnCb009913@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 --- Comment #20 from Ryan McCabe 2009-06-22 10:37:46 EDT --- Fixed a while ago. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221448.n5MEmusl019382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #9 from Boris Kolpackov 2009-06-22 10:48:54 EDT --- That would definitely be simpler. However, this involves two changes that I am not prepared to make at this time. Namely, the change from GPL to LGPL and the change from the specific, known version of the license to some future version which will have terms and conditions that I have no control over. So at the moment adding the above exception seems like the simplest way forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:54:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221454.n5MEsYjP022252@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-22 10:54:30 EDT --- Last ping. I'm afraid, we should close this ticked ad FE-DEADREVIEW -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:56:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:56:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507377] New: Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507377 Summary: Review Request: jana - An interface library for time-related PIM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/jana.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/jana-0.4.5-0.1.20090622gitb416a41.fc11.src.rpm An interface library for time-related personal information management related data. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 15:09:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:09:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221509.n5MF90OC030886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #13 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-22 11:08:59 EDT --- (In reply to comment #12) > (In reply to comment #11) > > The package is not using the Fedora optimization flags (available through > > %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS). You need to patch the makefile to get these > > into use. Keep the -D and -I and the -std switches, remove everything else (as > > the -W switches). You don't need to touch the libs. > > Okay, I have this working here, but want to make sure of something before I > post a new spec: I should remove the entire -ifeq (${CC},gcc)/-endif block > that contains all the -W switches? I have done that and also patched in > $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) to the makefile and it all builds ok here in mock and I can > now see that the Fedora optimization flags are being used. Still, I wanted to > make sure of my understanding about the -W flags. Sure, you can do that, since you don't need to take into account other compilers than gcc. The -W switches control warnings that the compiler displays, so they're mostly a cosmetic change. $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) has a -Wall, though, so it's better to remove anything that might collide with it. btw. you can see what rpm macros do with $ rpm --eval %{optflags} (I don't know if it's possible to do the same thing with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but these are just two different styles of writing the same thing as %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 14:56:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:56:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221456.n5MEurVQ017754@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #12 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-22 10:56:52 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > The package is not using the Fedora optimization flags (available through > %{optflags} or $RPM_OPT_FLAGS). You need to patch the makefile to get these > into use. Keep the -D and -I and the -std switches, remove everything else (as > the -W switches). You don't need to touch the libs. Okay, I have this working here, but want to make sure of something before I post a new spec: I should remove the entire -ifeq (${CC},gcc)/-endif block that contains all the -W switches? I have done that and also patched in $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) to the makefile and it all builds ok here in mock and I can now see that the Fedora optimization flags are being used. Still, I wanted to make sure of my understanding about the -W flags. > > - Add LDFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" to the end of the make command to use the > optimization flags in the linking process too (if the object files have been > compiled e.g. with -fPIC then linking will fail without it). Done. I tried this before but it failed, but most likely because I had not patched the makefile as you pointed out. :-) Patching the makefile to add in the $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) works fine now. > > - Instead of > examples/* > I'd ship > examples/ > since this is a bit clearer. Yes, good point. Thanks. > > - Add TODO to %doc. > > Done. > I can sponsor you, if you first show me that you know the guidelines. To do > that you need to read the Packaging and the Review Guidelines and to > demonstrate you understand them by making at least one another submission and > do a couple of informal reviews of other people's packages (you'll be able to > do formal ones once I have sponsored you). Jussi, thank you very much. I will continue to study the Guidelines and demonstrate my understanding in the manner that you suggest. I appreciate the feedback and willingness to sponsor me. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 15:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448661] Review Request: u-boot-tools - contains mkimage a tool to create kernel bootable images for u-boot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221545.n5MFjCFP013270@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448661 --- Comment #19 from Josh Boyer 2009-06-22 11:45:11 EDT --- I'd rather just take over this package instead of marking it DEADREVIEW. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 15:54:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 11:54:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497756] Review Request: lpg - LALR Parser Generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221554.n5MFslJu016722@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497756 --- Comment #18 from Mat Booth 2009-06-22 11:54:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Apologies, Mat, I haven't had a chance to look at this. I'll try to do it this > week. No biggie, just pinging. :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 16:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:00:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 433678] Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221600.n5MG0Qip027957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 --- Comment #21 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 12:00:25 EDT --- ok, I guess we should ask Andreas to recheck things? Andreas? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 16:04:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:04:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506825] Review Request: bickley - A meta data management API and framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221604.n5MG4HPZ021605@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506825 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507392 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 16:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502024] Review Request: xsd - W3C XML schema to C++ data binding compiler In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221620.n5MGKrrI028153@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502024 --- Comment #10 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 12:20:52 EDT --- spot, would you judge if the license draft on comment 7 is sane for this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 16:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221646.n5MGk4sk009292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #73 from David Halik 2009-06-22 12:45:54 EDT --- Can anyone give me some pointers on how to scrub the extra $ORIGIN that keeps getting added on? I spent a bunch of time this weekend trying to remove it from the rpath, but it is continually tacked on at some point. Alfred who runs the Solaris rpm for Songbird essentially disables the rpath, then sets his own afterwards in order to clean anything being added automatically: LDFLAGS="-norunpath -z ignore -R'\$\$ORIGIN:\$\$ORIGIN/..'" Is there a way to accomplish this with gcc? -norunpath and -z ignore are Solaris-isms I believe. Any help would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 16:53:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:53:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466717] Review Request: python-cvxopt - A Python Package for Convex Optimization In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221653.n5MGr9nZ010864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466717 Bug 466717 depends on bug 475411, which changed state. Bug 475411 Summary: suitesparse is incorrectly linked and has undefined symbols https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475411 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 16:31:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:31:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221631.n5MGV1OJ031300@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:03:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:03:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221703.n5MH35pi013308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 13:03:04 EDT --- For 1.5.2-1 * Timestamps - When using "install" or "cp" command, add "-p" option to keep timestamps on installed files ! check - There is tests/ directory and some files are under there. Is it possible to add %check stage and execute some test program there? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:03:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:03:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221703.n5MH3dRw013523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-22 13:03:37 EDT --- The 0.9.3 release doesn't compile on rawhide. I've updated to the 0.11.1 release that's part of the moblin beta release and it compiles OK. I'm going to file a bug to get them to update the git tarball availability. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1429792 SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/nbtk-0.11.1-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] New: Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Summary: Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-download-order.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-download-order-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description of problem: Yum plugin to order downloads. Right now it just orders based on size. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:12:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:12:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473046] Review Request: miniupnpc - command line tool to control NAT in UPnP-enabled routers as Linksys, D-Link etc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221712.n5MHCvLD016253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473046 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(avi at unix.sh) | --- Comment #27 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 13:12:53 EDT --- Closing. If someone wants to import this package into Fedora, please file a new review request and mark this one as a duplicate of the new one. Thank you! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221736.n5MHaTaJ016964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 13:36:28 EDT --- Okay. + This package itself is now okay + You have other review requests, which seem fine from very quick glance at them ------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (libpuzzle) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 10/11, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221736.n5MHaodM023194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 13:36:49 EDT --- (Removing needsponsor) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:37:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:37:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221737.n5MHbStS023371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 13:37:27 EDT --- (Removing needsponsor) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505358] Review Request: php-hkit - Simple PHP5 API for extracting common microformats from a page In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221736.n5MHaatx023146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505358 Patrick Monnerat changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Patrick Monnerat 2009-06-22 13:36:35 EDT --- Imported and built in rawhide. Will handle the subdirectory on a separate bug report. Closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221739.n5MHdVTA017547@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Steve Traylen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |steve at traylen.net --- Comment #1 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-22 13:39:30 EDT --- H Rakesh, I'm not an official package reviewer. There are some .pyc/o files that need adding to the files list. Currently: error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/yum-plugins/download-order.pyc /usr/lib/yum-plugins/download-order.pyo see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Byte_Compiled_Files This is on F11. Steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221748.n5MHmqFo019871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-22 13:48:49 EDT --- Good: + Package sources matches with upstream (md5sum: 6d9ba5141022e10696dc92f296ae5ed3) + Specified license on license tag matches with copyright notes on source files Your package is APPROVED !!! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:54:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:54:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221754.n5MHscni027342@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224 --- Comment #16 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 13:54:36 EDT --- Sorry for delay. - Well, you don't have to mark GConf schemas file as %config(noreplace). We usually regard these files as non-configuration files. Without marking that rpmlint may complain, however for this case please just ignore it. - Then I will wait for your another review request or your pre-review of other person's review request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 17:55:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:55:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221755.n5MHtnNx022117@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-22 13:55:48 EDT --- Thanks for the review, I have made the changes to the install, to allow timestamps to be retained. The tests how ever are a bit tricky as the the test suite has issues, it does not set the module paths correctly which leads PHP to issue warning messages about being unable to load other modules configured by /etc/php.d/*.ini files. Although the test results are correct, rpmbuild flags them as Failed due to the warning messages. As you can see the expected output is BFRoaXMgIAIUdGVzdCBvZiBMWkYgZXh0ZW5zaW9u and the actual output is the same BFRoaXMgIAIUdGVzdCBvZiBMWkYgZXh0ZW5zaW9u which however is negated by the warning messages issued by PHP The output is below. ---- EXPECTED OUTPUT BFRoaXMgIAIUdGVzdCBvZiBMWkYgZXh0ZW5zaW9u ---- ACTUAL OUTPUT PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/curl.so' - modules/curl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/curl.so' - modules/curl.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/dbase.so' - modules/dbase.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/dbase.so' - modules/dbase.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/geoip.so' - modules/geoip.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/geoip.so' - modules/geoip.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/json.so' - modules/json.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/json.so' - modules/json.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/libpuzzle.so' - modules/libpuzzle.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/libpuzzle.so' - modules/libpuzzle.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/zip.so' - modules/zip.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library 'modules/zip.so' - modules/zip.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory in Unknown on line 0 BFRoaXMgIAIUdGVzdCBvZiBMWkYgZXh0ZW5zaW9u ---- FAILED Please advise on the way forward. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 18:09:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:09:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221809.n5MI9eCD031967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 14:09:39 EDT --- About test suite warning: - Sorry, actually I am not familiar with PHP and currently I don't know how to resolve this issue. If you think test suite is not needed, you can omit it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 18:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221821.n5MILBSb029370@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-22 14:21:11 EDT --- I think for now we can go with out the test suite, the other existing php pecl extensions do not implement it as well. Please find the updated spec and srpms at the following urls UPDATED SPEC FILE: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-lzf/php-pecl-lzf.spec UPDATED SRPM: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-lzf/php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 18:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:43:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221843.n5MIhLlK010633@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-22 14:43:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libpuzzle Short Description: Library to quickly find visually similar images (gif, png,jpg) Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 18:51:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:51:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221851.n5MIpHZ9007080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-22 14:51:16 EDT --- Well, - For this package adding "INSTALL='install -p'" to 'make install' makes little sense, because "make install" just installs compiled binary file. What I said here is that for example at the line below: --------------------------------------------------------------- %{__install} -m 644 %{pecl_name}.xml %{buildroot}%{pecl_xmldir}/%{name}.xml --------------------------------------------------------------- you should use "%{_install} -p -m 644". - And forgot to mention but please use %{__make}, %{__mv}, %{__rm} for consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:06:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:06:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221906.n5MJ6v9R011650@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-22 15:06:57 EDT --- Issues have been noted and fixed. UPDATED: SPEC: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-lzf/php-pecl-lzf.spec SRPM: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-lzf/php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc11.src.rpm The other spec has been updated as well for macro consistency. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:15:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:15:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221915.n5MJF5Yn022285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-22 15:15:03 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: 389-admin Short Description: Admin Server for 389 Directory Server Owners: rmeggins nhosoi nkinder Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:29:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:29:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221929.n5MJT1sL018179@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |sanjay.ankur at gmail.com Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-22 15:28:59 EDT --- Please use "monospace" not "mono" in the fontconfig file, I don't think fontconfig understands "mono" Appart from that, the package is fine and clean; great work, thank you very much for packaging a new font for Fedora (please continue :)) ??? APPROVED ??? The next steps as usual start at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221944.n5MJitbP030865@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #14 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-22 15:44:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Sure, you can do that, since you don't need to take into account other > compilers than gcc. > > The -W switches control warnings that the compiler displays, so they're mostly > a cosmetic change. $(RPM_OPT_FLAGS) has a -Wall, though, so it's better to > remove anything that might collide with it. Right, thank you for the clarification. > > btw. you can see what rpm macros do with > $ rpm --eval %{optflags} > (I don't know if it's possible to do the same thing with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, but > these are just two different styles of writing the same thing as %{buildroot} > and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT.) Yep, I had checked those out already. I also made the macro style used consistent in the spec file. It mostly was, but there were a few places where it was inconsistent. Updated Spec: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux.spec Updated SRPM: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux-0.8-4.fc11.src.rpm These have also been put through rpmlint, mock, and koji with no errors or warnings reported. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:46:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:46:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221946.n5MJkniW022347@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 19:46:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:46:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906221946.n5MJkZ8M031700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-06-22 15:46:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-CategoryTree Short Description: Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree Owners: ianweller Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 20:11:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:11:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222011.n5MKB4gg006404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #15 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-22 16:11:03 EDT --- - Now there's -iquote. twice in the build flags: it's already added in the INCDIRS variable where you replaced -I- to -iquote. , but you have added another one in the Linux section after -icompat. - I wouldn't use a patch for the iquote issue, I'd just use a sed oneliner in %setup which does the same thing: sed -i "s| -I- | -iquote. |g" GNUMakefile That or I'd merge the iquote thing with the optflags patch. Anyway, this is up to you. To me unnecessary patch files are just unnecessary trouble if they aren't needed for very long (this should be fixed in the next upstream release, right?). ** rpmlint output is clean. MUST: The package does not yet exist in Fedora. The Review Request is not a duplicate. OK MUST: The spec file for the package is legible and macros are used consistently. OK MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}. OK MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. OK MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. NEEDSWORK - License is ISC and BSD instead of plain BSD, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. * Most of the files are licensed under ISC * Some of the files in compat/ are under the 2-clause and 3-clause BSD licenses => resulting license is ISC and BSD. (You can use Debian's licensecheck.pl as a first step to audit the licenses.) MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms. OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. N/A MUST: Optflags are used and time stamps preserved. OK MUST: Packages containing shared library files must call ldconfig. N/A MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates or require the package that owns the directory. OK MUST: Files only listed once in %files listings. OK MUST: Debuginfo package is complete. OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. OK MUST: Clean section exists. OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. N/A MUST: All relevant items are included in %doc. Items in %doc do not affect runtime of application. OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix then library files ending in .so must go in a -devel package. N/A MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A MUST: Packages does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A MUST: Desktop files are installed properly. N/A MUST: No file conflicts with other packages and no general names. OK MUST: Buildroot cleaned before install. OK SHOULD: %{?dist} tag is used in release. OK SHOULD: If the package does not include license text(s) as separate files from upstream, the packager should query upstream to include it. NEEDSWORK - No license file included, you should ask upstream to add one. SHOULD: The package builds in mock. OK ** So, apart from the license issue this package is good to go. I won't give you an approval yet, I want to see some more action on your part first. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 20:38:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 16:38:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222038.n5MKcJOG012591@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:16:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:16:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222116.n5MLG8pU021853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #3 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-06-22 17:16:07 EDT --- Hello, and thank you for a quick reply! *1. The proposed split has a simple rationale - move rarely used features to separate packages and keep the total number of packages to the minimum: 'poco' - contains retail builds of the general-purpose libraries 'poco-extra' - retail builds of the libraries that are either rarely used or pull peculiar dependencies 'poco-debug' - debug builds (POCO makefiles produce them) of all libraries, they are used only during development of the POCO-based applications for testing purposes 'poco-devel' - headers and .so links to retail and debug libraries 'poco-debuginfo' - automatically generated package with debug-related information But I agree to further split 'poco-extra' into three separate 'poco-mysql', 'poco-odbc' and 'poco-zip'. This variant (although requiring increased typing from the .spec compositor) is more reasonable. *2. I am not sure that 'poco-debug' has to be split because 'poco-devel', as a development package, should pull everything anyway (see http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/libpoco-dev which partially demonstrates this). But it may be renamed to 'poco-testing' in order to avoid associations with 'poco-debuginfo'. *3. The perl build dependency is mentioned as "/usr/bin/perl" instead of "perl" in order to emphasize the dependency on a particular file (a CLI program in this case) but not on a package; probably the same situation as with "/sbin/ldconfig" being used instead of "glibc". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:28:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:28:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222128.n5MLSsw1024361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #74 from Matej Cepl 2009-06-22 17:28:51 EDT --- http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Schedule/RpathCheckBuildsys -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222141.n5MLfcGt016101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Mauricio Henriquez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:46:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:46:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226356] Merge Review: rcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222146.n5MLkpq8017374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226356 --- Comment #5 from Ville Skytt? 2009-06-22 17:46:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349004) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349004) Fix remaining issues Here's a patch for the remaining issues and a few other improvements. Let me know if you'd like me to apply and build this for devel. Patch0 should be downloaded from the URL in the patched specfile, and rcs-5.7-stupidrcs.patch can now be removed also from CVS. Updated DESTDIR patch follows in a jiffy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 21:47:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226356] Merge Review: rcs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222147.n5MLlZMW028185@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226356 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2009-06-22 17:47:34 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349005) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349005) Updated DESTDIR patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:11:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:11:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479147] Review Request: skanlite - A scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222211.n5MMB8WF022956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479147 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sven at lank.es Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #16 from Sven Lankes 2009-06-22 18:11:06 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 507475 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:11:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:11:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222211.n5MMB9D8022982@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tpr at d5k.net --- Comment #1 from Sven Lankes 2009-06-22 18:11:06 EDT --- *** Bug 479147 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] New: Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Summary: Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sven at lank.es QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/skanlite.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/skanlite-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Skanlite is a light-weight scanning application based on libksane. rpmlint on the srpm is silent, on the rpm it reports dangling symlinks (also see #491247). I don't think that should stop skanlite from entering fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:13:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222213.n5MMD3Wc023259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 --- Comment #2 from Sven Lankes 2009-06-22 18:13:02 EDT --- The specfile was actually done by Teemu Rytilahti who seems to have lost interest in the package (see bz 479147). I have only fixed the license tag and updated to the latest upstream release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:32:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:32:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507479] New: Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507479 Summary: Review Request: moblin-cursor-theme - Moblin X cursors icon theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-cursor-theme.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-cursor-theme-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Moblin X cursors icon theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426754] Review Request: ghc-xmonad-contrib - Third party extensions for xmonad In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222231.n5MMVFb2005166@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426754 --- Comment #15 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-22 18:31:13 EDT --- Sounds good to me, the only reason I started was your link was dead, and I needed it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507480] New: Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507480 Summary: Review Request: moblin-icon-theme - Moblin icon theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-icon-theme.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-icon-theme-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Moblin icon theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:37:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507481] New: Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507481 Summary: Review Request: moblin-sound-theme - Moblin sound theme Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-sound-theme.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-sound-theme-0.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Moblin sound theme -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 22:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222240.n5MMe09t028065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 22 23:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906222355.n5MNtHsf009974@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-22 19:55:16 EDT --- REVIEW FOR 1afd8e1de03fda607c04fcded9ece2c0 skanlite-0.3-1.fc11.src.rpm FIX - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint Downloads/skanlite-* skanlite.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/sv//common skanlite.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/uk//common skanlite.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/de/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/de//common skanlite.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/pt//common skanlite.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/skanlite/common /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/common OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2 or GPLv3 OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license: OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 4cd852d5be3c27a0ac9002c704b019bb OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} ( or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ). OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N//A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431041 OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - Latest version packaged OK - RPM_OPT_FLAGS not honored FIX - Timestamps are not preserved Issues: - Use %global instead of %define, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define - Timestamp of Source0 does not match, see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps - Do not use macros for %{__rm}, simply rm is ok - Add TODO to %doc - Remove --vendor="" from desktop-file-install - Mark the docs as %doc (although rpm should be smart enough to do this automatically). - Remove the empty common symlinks or make them point to something that is actually there, as Mamoru already said in bug 479147. Notes: - The summary is a little weak. How about "Lightweight scanning program for KDE"? - Use wildcarts for the Languages in the documentation: %{_kde4_docdir}/HTML/*/skanlite/ - The Help button does not work because khelpcenter is not pulled in by the deps. This is ok, we are not requiring yelp for Gnome apps ether. Please fix these issues and I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] New: Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 Summary: Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bjohnson at symetrix.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-forks.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/perl-forks-0.33-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The forks.pm module is a drop-in replacement for threads.pm. It has the same syntax as the threads.pm module (it even takes over its namespace) but has some significant differences: - you do _not_ need a special (threaded) version of Perl - it is _much_ more economic with memory usage on OS's that support COW - it is more efficient in the startup of threads - it is slightly less efficient in the stopping of threads - it is less efficient in inter-thread communication If for nothing else, it allows you to use the Perl threading model in non-threaded Perl builds and in older versions of Perl (5.6.0 and higher are supported). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:21:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230021.n5N0LiQs026894@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504389 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507491] Review Request: perl-forks - A drop-in replacement for Perl threads using fork() In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230025.n5N0PBGN015661@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507491 Bernard Johnson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507493 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230037.n5N0bKsb018193@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 00:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505932] Review Request: zikula-module-crpTag - Simple Zikula component for tagging items, based on hooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230057.n5N0veBN001533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505932 Eric Christensen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |simon at zikula.org --- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-22 20:57:39 EDT --- SPEC URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-crpTag/zikula-module-crpTag.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-crpTag/zikula-module-crpTag-0.1.3-3.src.rpm License changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 01:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230110.n5N1AVt9025137@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-22 21:10:29 EDT --- REVIEW for 59d3e938fd52497670bf35513e69304d efte-1.0-3.fc11.src.rpm TBD - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ or Artistic OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license files from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 d7f9b5514ceeef371d91853e56ef8288 OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. N/A - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. N/A - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot}. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. FAIL - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock. TBD - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. OK - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - Latest version packaged OK - RPM_OPT_FLAGS are honored OK - Timestamp of Source= matches OK - Timestamps are preserved during %install OK - All docs are included in %doc Issues: - mockbuild fails with: rm: cannot remove `/usr/bin/vefte': No such file or directory see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431125 This is weird, because when I comment out the line it fails due to unpackaged files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431152 You should test if the file is really there before removing it. - better use pushd/popd instead of cd src/cd .. - Omit INSTALL from %doc, it's useless - "Categories=Development;TextEditor;" in the desktop file looks a little unconventional, but I guess in this case it is correct. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 01:35:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 21:35:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230135.n5N1ZQRR030020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 Conrad Meyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(konrad at tylerc.org | |) | --- Comment #4 from Conrad Meyer 2009-06-22 21:35:25 EDT --- I don't have anything right now; if I get it working, would it be alright to re-open this review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:02:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:02:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] New: Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Summary: Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: radford at blackbean.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is a clean and usable font. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:13:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:13:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230213.n5N2D6Y6015693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #50 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:13:04 EDT --- Please add a cvs template here so we know what you want: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests Then reset the cvs flag. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:15:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:15:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504707] Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230215.n5N2F1pF004922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:15:00 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:24:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:24:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230224.n5N2OYL2018328@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #15 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:24:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:23:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:23:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230223.n5N2NGjD007208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:23:14 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230225.n5N2POEY008016@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:25:23 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:26:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:26:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230226.n5N2Q7OX008148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:26:06 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:27:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:27:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230227.n5N2RQmn008343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:27:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:28:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:28:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230228.n5N2SfbQ008674@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:28:40 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230229.n5N2Tdv4008856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-22 22:29:38 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:47:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:47:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230247.n5N2lBY2013262@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(guthrie at counterex | |ample.org) | --- Comment #7 from John Guthrie 2009-06-22 22:47:10 EDT --- I apologize for the delay. My life's been a little hectic with a possible move in the works plus trying to find a new job. I have built a new package with the new file called LICENSE.fedora. It contains the email conversations that I have had with the authors regarding the licensing. I've not added any additional text into that file. Please let me know if I need to add any additional info in that file. The authors were taking the stance that they have put the license into one of the source code files, and that the rest of the files are derived works so they fall under the same license. I have not asked regarding an explicit README.Licensing file. The new SRPM can be found here: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/mediawiki-Renameuser-0-0.4.20090505svn.fc11.src.rpm Here is the new SPEC file: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/mediawiki-Renameuser.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 02:49:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 22:49:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230249.n5N2n38W013587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #8 from John Guthrie 2009-06-22 22:49:02 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > The authors were taking the stance that they have put the license into one of > the source code files, and that the rest of the files are derived works so they > fall under the same license. I have not asked regarding an explicit > README.Licensing file. I should also add that just general advice on how to proceed with the licensing issue would be appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 03:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 23:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230319.n5N3Jj5r030382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-22 23:19:44 EDT --- bouncycastle-tsp-1.43-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bouncycastle-tsp-1.43-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 04:44:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:44:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230444.n5N4ioZI014157@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Bug 504710 depends on bug 504707, which changed state. Bug 504707 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 04:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504707] Review Request: rubygem-locale_rails - Ruby-Locale for Ruby on Rails In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230444.n5N4inlG014127@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504707 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 00:44:47 EDT --- Successfully rebuilt on all branches, submitted push request on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 04:59:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 00:59:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230459.n5N4xMWc017036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #6 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-23 00:59:21 EDT --- Ok, I get a 404 for the site, you need to have it point to the actual site. and the version is wrong http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Package_Version It should be audex-0.71-0.1.beta3 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 05:33:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:33:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230533.n5N5Xwj8012151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-23 01:33:57 EDT --- Fixes to retain timestamp information as well as consistent macro usage. UPDATED: SPEC: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-geoip/php-pecl-geoip.spec SRPM: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pecl-geoip/php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 05:53:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 01:53:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230553.n5N5rPKr027945@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #6 from Harald Hoyer 2009-06-23 01:53:25 EDT --- > - License - GPLv2+ > - License field in spec matches - *** > > *** The license in the code is GPLv2 or later; the spec tag should be GPLv2+. > It's also not present in most of the shell snippets; unsure what the > requirements are there. fixed > - Spec in American English - *** > > generic package description: > This package requires everything, which is needed to build a generic > all purpose initramfs. > > Should probably be 'everything that is needed', without the comma. changed > - Package needs ExcludeArch - *** > > *** The arch/noarch switching seems a bit odd. Can we just get a new util-linux > in so we don't need this? left in until util-linux-ng provides switch_root > The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the > main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems > wrong.) The idea is to generate a "generic" dracut image with every kernel build, so that the user does not have to build his own, though he can do it. > > That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc. > tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and > it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been > installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship > it. add the mkinitrd Requires to the basic dracut rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 06:21:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 02:21:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230621.n5N6LfSo022204@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-23 02:21:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Issues: > - mockbuild fails with: > rm: cannot remove `/usr/bin/vefte': No such file or directory > see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431125 > This is weird, because when I comment out the line it fails due to unpackaged > files: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431152 > You should test if the file is really there before removing it. Ugh, missing %{buildroot} before %{_bindir}. Fixed. > - better use pushd/popd instead of cd src/cd .. Maybe, if the directory structure was more complicated. The stack operations pushd/popd seem a like an overkill :) > - Omit INSTALL from %doc, it's useless Whoops, shouldn't have been there. > - "Categories=Development;TextEditor;" in the desktop file looks a little > unconventional, but I guess in this case it is correct. Yes, since this is an editor for programmers. http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte.spec http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpms/efte-1.0-4.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:08:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230708.n5N78oIk010751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:08:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:08:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230708.n5N78XwI010685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-23 03:08:32 EDT --- Thanks, Parag! Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session Short Description: Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:12:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:12:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230712.n5N7Cf4F000772@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-23 03:12:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > > Suggestions: > 1) Fix changelog entry before cvs import. Done. > 2) You need to > Requires: perl(File::MMagic), not picked up by yum. Done. > APPROVED. Thanks, Parag! Requesting cvs. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session Short Description: Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:33:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:33:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230733.n5N7XWtB015815@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-23 03:33:30 EDT --- Ok, I hope that the naming issue will only be temporary and using the current upstream archive will create a load of ugly code in the .spec. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:56:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:56:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480215] Review Request: slsnif - Serial line sniffer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230756.n5N7ujwG011223@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480215 Tsvi Mostovicz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ttmost at gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Tsvi Mostovicz 2009-06-23 03:56:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > "Serial line sniffer (slsnif). slsnif is a serial port logging utility." is not > OK. I suggest "Serial line sniffer (slsnif) is a serial port logging utility." > > How can I test the applications, short of manually creating /dev/pty? strace > says: > open("/dev/ptyp0", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/ptyp1", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/ptyp2", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/ptyp3", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/ptyp4", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/ptyp5", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > [...] > open("/dev/ptyTe", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > open("/dev/ptyTf", O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY|O_NONBLOCK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or > directory) > dup(2) = 4 > fcntl(4, F_GETFL) = 0x8002 (flags O_RDWR|O_LARGEFILE) > fstat(4, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0600, st_rdev=makedev(136, 5), ...}) = 0 > mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = > 0x2aaaaaaad000 > lseek(4, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > write(4, "Failed to open a pty: No such fi"..., 48Failed to open a pty: No such > file or directory > > and the application dies Use the -u switch to "use SYSV (unix98) ptys instead of BSD ones". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 08:08:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:08:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230808.n5N88hFc014389@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-23 04:08:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Ok, I hope that the naming issue will only be temporary and using the current > upstream archive will create a load of ugly code in the .spec. I hope so too.... the way it is at the moment is painful! Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 08:14:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:14:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230814.n5N8E98G016061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-23 04:14:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bognor-regis Short Description: Media daemon and play queue manager Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 07:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 03:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230758.n5N7wmmm011809@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 --- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-23 03:58:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > Please use "monospace" not "mono" in the fontconfig file, I don't think > fontconfig understands "mono" > Made the change > Appart from that, the package is fine and clean; great work, thank you very > much for packaging a new font for Fedora (please continue :)) > > ??? APPROVED ??? > > The next steps as usual start at > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a continuing from here :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 08:36:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:36:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] New: Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 Summary: Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pycolumnize.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pycolumnize-0.3.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A Python module to format a simple (i.e. not nested) list into aligned columns. A string with embedded newline characters is returned. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 08:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230849.n5N8nCUm023922@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-23 04:49:11 EDT --- Remove the comment about CFLAGS and no arch packages. BR should be python-setuptools-devel and not python-setuptools. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 08:58:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 04:58:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230858.n5N8wYER025933@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2009-06-23 04:58:33 EDT --- Fixed. Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pycolumnize.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/pycolumnize-0.3.2-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:05:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:05:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230905.n5N95723027755@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-23 05:05:05 EDT --- Looks good. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:08:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:08:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230908.n5N98eSf007025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sergio.pasra at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sergio.pasra at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:10:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:10:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230910.n5N9AjXT008037@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Sergio Pascual 2009-06-23 05:10:43 EDT --- In you spec, include all the python generated files with /usr/lib/yum-plugins/download-order.py* And you can join %doc README %doc COPYING in %doc README COPYING -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:10:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:10:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497833] Review Request: tuna - Application tuning GUI & command line utility In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230910.n5N9Aufn008194@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497833 --- Comment #2 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-23 05:10:52 EDT --- > SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~acme/tuna/tuna-0.8.4.tar.bz2 You're expected to put the src.rpm URL there. > %dir %{_datadir}/tuna/help/kthreads/ > %{_datadir}/tuna/help/kthreads/* Due to the catch-all wildcard '*' these two lines could be replaced with just a single line: %{_datadir}/tuna/help/kthreads/ > %changelog Commonly one only sums up packaging related changes there, i.e. actual changes applied to the spec file, not all internal code changes which should be covered by an included ChangeLog file. In particular, mostly only when one adds patch files to the spec or replaces the source tarball, one gives a summary of what is expected to affect the user, but not full internal log of implementation changes. > %defattr(0755,root,root,0755) It's amazing to see that the widely used %defattr(-,root,root,-) [which defaults to %defattr(0644,root,root,0755)] isn't used in this spec file, but no comment explain why it isn't used. Please run rpmlint on the src.rpm *and* the built rpms. Pre-review your own packages in accordance with the Review Guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:19:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:19:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490210] Review Request: moc - A ncurses-based audio player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230919.n5N9J0cg032150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 --- Comment #15 from Michael Schwendt 2009-06-23 05:18:58 EDT --- > What happens if a fedora package has a dependency on a rpmfusion package. It must not create such a dependency. It would be a packaging mistake if it did. During review it won't be accepted into the Fedora package collection. Btw, the spec file is pretty bad - sloppy - with regard to packaging guidelines that are in use for several years. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] New: Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 Summary: Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: ron at ron.dk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert.spec SRPM URL: http://ron.fedorapeople.org/perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert-0.04-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Hilbert Curve module provides some useful functions using Hilberts Space- filling Curve. This is handy for things like Dithering, Flattening n- dimensional data, fractals - all kind of things really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:47:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:47:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230947.n5N9lYOW006779@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 05:47:33 EDT --- libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:47:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230947.n5N9leS5018691@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 05:47:39 EDT --- libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libpuzzle-0.11-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:48:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:48:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230948.n5N9msfO019128@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi --- Comment #4 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-23 05:48:53 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > - Do not use macros for %{__rm}, simply rm is ok This is a legal use of macros (although from a style point of view I agree with Christoph). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:48:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:48:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230948.n5N9mf4W007045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Ankur Sinha changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #13 from Ankur Sinha 2009-06-23 05:48:40 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: oflb-notcouriersans-fonts Short Description: NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono Owners: ankursinha Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: fonts-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 09:55:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 05:55:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906230955.n5N9tKZi009111@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #83 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-06-23 05:55:16 EDT --- there are rpath issues: ERROR 0001: file '/usr/bin/application-browser' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] ERROR 0001: file '/usr/libexec/main-menu' contains a standard rpath '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64] you will have to use chrpath to remove rpath from those binaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 10:41:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231041.n5NAfp4M032199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Kushal Das 2009-06-23 06:41:49 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pycolumnize Short Description: Python module to align in columns a simple list Owners: kushal Branches: F-11 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 11:26:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:26:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507083] Review Request: poco - C++ class libraries for network-centric applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231126.n5NBQPH9010016@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507083 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Udushlivy 2009-06-23 07:26:24 EDT --- Spec URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/2/poco.spec SRPM URL: http://crow-designer.sourceforge.net/temp/2/poco-1.3.5-2.fc11.src.rpm CHANGES ======= - The 'poco-extra' subpackage was split into separate 'poco-odbc', - 'poco-mysql' and 'poco-zip'. The 'poco-debug' subpackage was renamed - to 'poco-testing'. The 'poco-doc' subpackage with the API reference - documentation was added. RPMLINT ======= $ rpmlint * poco-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poco-doc-1.3.5/css/styles.css poco-doc.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/poco-doc-1.3.5/css/prettify.css poco-mysql.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-odbc.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-testing.x86_64: W: no-documentation poco-zip.x86_64: W: no-documentation 8 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. $ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 11:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 07:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] New: Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Summary: Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-psi.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-psi-0.3b1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: psi is a Python module providing direct access to real-time system and process information. Did a successful scratch build in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431763 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 12:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507585] Review Request: python-psi - Shows real time system information in python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231221.n5NCL74W024073@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507585 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sundaram at redhat.com QAContact|extras-qa at fedoraproject.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 12:38:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:38:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231238.n5NCcHZJ013388@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nphilipp at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Nils Philippsen 2009-06-23 08:38:15 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 12:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231259.n5NCx8Zg000617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Mauricio Henriquez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #51 from Mauricio Henriquez 2009-06-23 08:59:07 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: monodevelop-debugger-mdb Short Description: MonoDevelop Debugger Addin Owners: buhochileno Branches: devel F-10 F-11 InitialCC: palango -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 13:14:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231314.n5NDEtX3005190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #3 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-23 09:14:54 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/yum-download-order.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/yum-download-order-0.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Updated .. may you check this out whether it generates pyc and pyo files ? Removed Makefile and have used setup.py similar to yum-presto plugin spec file Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 13:35:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:35:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506755] Review Request: tmux - a terminal multiplexer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231335.n5NDZugI027861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506755 --- Comment #16 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-23 09:35:55 EDT --- (In reply to comment #15) > - Now there's -iquote. twice in the build flags: it's already added in the > INCDIRS variable where you replaced -I- to -iquote. , but you have added > another one in the Linux section after -icompat. > > - I wouldn't use a patch for the iquote issue, I'd just use a sed oneliner in > %setup which does the same thing: > sed -i "s| -I- | -iquote. |g" GNUMakefile > That or I'd merge the iquote thing with the optflags patch. Anyway, this is up > to you. To me unnecessary patch files are just unnecessary trouble if they > aren't needed for very long (this should be fixed in the next upstream release, > right?). Done via sed invocation. > > MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. > NEEDSWORK > - License is ISC and BSD instead of plain BSD, see > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing. > * Most of the files are licensed under ISC > * Some of the files in compat/ are under the 2-clause and 3-clause BSD licenses > => resulting license is ISC and BSD. > (You can use Debian's licensecheck.pl as a first step to audit the licenses.) Ah, thanks for the heads up on that nifty tool. :-) I have modified the license field. Updated Spec URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux.spec Updated SRPM URL: http://chessgriffin.com/files/pkgs/fedora/tmux/tmux-0.8-5.fc11.src.rpm Builds cleanly in mock and koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1431851 > > > ** > > So, apart from the license issue this package is good to go. I won't give you > an approval yet, I want to see some more action on your part first. Understood, thanks again for the review and helpful suggestions. This has been a big help to me in understanding some of the Fedora packaging nuances. Cheers! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 13:47:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 09:47:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] New: Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Summary: Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sshedmak at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Description: Its Free OpenType font for Telugu created by Dr. Tirumala Krishna Desikacharyulu. Font is Unicode compliant. Also, request for packaging this font was made in bug #481009. SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/vemana2000-fonts.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm fontconfig priority level has been kept to 69. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:12:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:12:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] New: Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 Summary: Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: funnylife_ma at yahoo.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/247749721/pypoppler.spec.html SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/247750206/pypoppler-0.10.0-1.fc11.src.rpm.html Description: Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library. It is needed to run programs written in Python and using Poppler set. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500746] Review Request: 389-admin - renamed from fedora-ds-admin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231411.n5NEBdKB020644@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500746 Rich Megginson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-23 10:11:37 EDT --- cvs import done - built in koji for rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:19:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:19:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501383] Review Request: 389-ds-console - 389 Directory Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231419.n5NEJIoX022351@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501383 --- Comment #3 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-23 10:19:17 EDT --- What can I do to speed up the package review process? I will not be able to release the 389 directory server suite without this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501385] Review Request: 389-admin-console - 389 Admin Server Management Console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231419.n5NEJfH0007244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501385 --- Comment #3 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-23 10:19:40 EDT --- What can I do to speed up the package review process? I will not be able to release the 389 directory server suite without this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:18:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:18:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 500506] Review Request: 389-adminutil - renamed from adminutil In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231418.n5NEIKfB006987@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=500506 --- Comment #5 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-23 10:18:19 EDT --- This package is used by 389-admin and 389-dsgw - even though those packages are approved, this one is not, and so will definitely complicate matters. What can I do to speed up the review for this package? I will not be able to release the 389 suite without this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:20:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:20:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501400] Review Request: 389-ds - 389 Directory, Administration, and Console Suite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231420.n5NEK5dX022812@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501400 --- Comment #2 from Rich Megginson 2009-06-23 10:20:04 EDT --- What can I do to speed up the package review process? I will not be able to release the 389 directory server suite without this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:25:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:25:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507621] Review Request: pypoppler - Python bindings for the Poppler PDF rendering library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231425.n5NEPpOu009144@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507621 --- Comment #1 from Hicham HAOUARI 2009-06-23 10:25:50 EDT --- gedit-latex-plugin-0.2rc2-1 : New upstream rc version this package depends on pypoppler package Spec URL : http://rapidshare.com/files/247752065/gedit-latex-plugin.spec.html SRPM URL : http://rapidshare.com/files/247754470/gedit-latex-plugin-0.2rc2-1.fc11.src.rpm.html This new version have a nice preview pane for produced pdfs, which accelerate latex writing speed considerably -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231428.n5NEStRn010145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sundaram at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-23 10:28:54 EDT --- FYI, In Fedora 11, all plugins have the name yum-plugin-foo instead of yum-foo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:37:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:37:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231437.n5NEbA4C012652@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-23 10:37:09 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > > The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the > > main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems > > wrong.) > > The idea is to generate a "generic" dracut image with every kernel build, so > that the user does not have to build his own, though he can do it. OK. So is the kernel going to continue to require mkinitrd (in which case it will not pull in the -generic package), or will it switch its requires? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231448.n5NEmqrP031219@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #3 from David Nalley 2009-06-23 10:48:50 EDT --- Upstream reports they believe they have fixed the licensing issues and have a new download here: http://code.zikula.org/scribite/downloads/23 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 14:48:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:48:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] New: Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mastahnke at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rubyzip.spec SRPM URL: http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/reviews/rubygem-rubyzip-0.9.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: rubyzip is a ruby module for reading and writing zip files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:01:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:01:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231501.n5NF1VSr002509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #7 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-23 11:01:30 EDT --- You're right, the URL was deprecated - I fixed that. Also, I changed the beta part as requested: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex-0.71-0.1.beta3.fc10.src.rpm Looks better now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231505.n5NF5R4S021173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Jeffrey Goh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #348890|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #85 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-06-23 11:05:24 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349100) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349100) updated spec file works around rpath problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:04:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:04:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231504.n5NF4TAw020244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 --- Comment #84 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-06-23 11:04:24 EDT --- rpath is the symptom. Real problem is that libtool inside the tarball is not fedora multilib compliant. Here's the "fix", I think. Uploading new attachments here and to http://www.linux.com.sg/fedora11/gnome-main-menu/0.9.12-6/gnome-main-menu.spec, but so is every other way of dealing with the rpath issue: RCS file: RCS/gnome-main-menu.spec,v retrieving revision 1.11 diff -r1.11 gnome-main-menu.spec 40a41 > BuildRequires: libtool 86c87 < make %{?_smp_mflags} --- > make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool %{?_smp_mflags} 159a161 > %exclude %{_libdir}/*.a -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 273701] Review Request: gnome-main-menu - Gnome Main Menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231510.n5NFAiKu023109@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=273701 Jeffrey Goh changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #348889|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #86 from Jeffrey Goh 2009-06-23 11:10:41 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349101) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349101) updated src rpm to fix rpath problem -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 15:34:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:34:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231534.n5NFYUb1029893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:01:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:01:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231601.n5NG1Kpr004418@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(kanarip at kanarip.c | |om) | --- Comment #21 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:01:18 EDT --- Well, I will once want to close this review request and I want to take over this package. Jeroen, if you want to co-maintain this package, please visit the new review request I will submit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231605.n5NG5qHY005746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #8 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-23 12:05:51 EDT --- The site says GPLv3 but in the SPEC you have version GPLv2. So yeah, you need to change it to GPLv3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:07:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:07:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507649] New: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507649 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mocha/rubygem-mocha.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mocha/rubygem-mocha-0.9.5-1.fc.src.rpm Description: Mocha is a library for mocking and stubbing using a syntax like that of JMock. It can be used with many testing frameworks e.g. Test::Unit, RSpec, test/spec, expectations, Dust, MiniTest and even JtestR. Mocha provides a unified, simple and readable syntax for both traditional mocking and partial mocking. Koji build: - For dist-f12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432058 - For dist-f11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432060 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:07:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:07:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507649] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231607.n5NG7gid020863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507649 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kanarip at kanarip.com --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:07:41 EDT --- *** Bug 459892 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:07:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231607.n5NG7gvi020835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #22 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:07:41 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 507649 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231610.n5NGAO8b006833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:10:23 EDT --- I will take this one. Instead I will appreciate it if you would review either of my review requests (bug 506168 or bug 507649, both are rubygem related) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231624.n5NGOWsU024732@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231627.n5NGRPq3010711@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:27:24 EDT --- Now closing (it seems F-10 build needs bouncycastle update and I will leave it to you) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505917] Review Request: libpuzzle - Library to quickly find visually similar images In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231627.n5NGRwmU025654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505917 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:27:57 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231630.n5NGUrhG011607@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 12:30:52 EDT --- Okay. ------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-pecl-lzf) is APPROVED by mtasaka ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231633.n5NGXp1g012052@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:53:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:53:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] New: Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Summary: Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: wojdyr at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: C++ library for reading files that contain x-y data from powder diffraction, spectroscopy or other experimental methods. The supported formats include: VAMAS, pdCIF, Bruker UXD and RAW, Philips UDF and RD, Rigaku DAT, Sietronics CPI, DBWS/DMPLOT, Koalariet XDD and others. The latest version of fityk (older version of fityk is in extras) depends on this lib. Seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 16:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231657.n5NGvdXV000356@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-23 12:57:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Now closing (it seems F-10 build needs bouncycastle update and I will > leave it to you) Yes, I will do that if I get requests or when I have the energy, as it needs buildroot overrides etc. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:09:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:09:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231709.n5NH9KII003206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 13:09:19 EDT --- (Please also write the actual CVS request as well as setting cvs flag) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:09:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:09:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231709.n5NH9Yc5020311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 13:09:33 EDT --- Okay (almost the same as bug 505848, same issues are addressed in -2) --------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-pecl-geoip) is APPROVED by mtasaka --------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:15:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:15:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231715.n5NHF3Ek021910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-23 13:15:01 EDT --- Sorry for my over site will add it now -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231716.n5NHGUvN022288@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 13:16:28 EDT --- gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:15:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:15:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231715.n5NHFXUR022121@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-23 13:15:33 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-lzf Short Description: Extension to handle LZF de/compression Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:15:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:15:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231715.n5NHFJd5022053@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 13:15:18 EDT --- gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:22:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:22:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231722.n5NHMfdX024077@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-23 13:22:40 EDT --- except yum-presto which till now was only one outside provided yum-utils until this one came. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:24:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:24:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231724.n5NHO7jK006756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-23 13:24:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-geoip Short Description: Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:24:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:24:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231724.n5NHOTiA024700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-23 13:24:28 EDT --- @Rahul Seems it is between to rename to yum-plugin-foo .. will update in some time. @Sergio I will rename it ... waiting for review between. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:33:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:33:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231733.n5NHXkBq027258@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:33:45 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:44:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:44:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231744.n5NHiqoX011509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs- --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:44:50 EDT --- You seem to have made a CVS request for the wrong package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:46:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:46:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231746.n5NHkQPa012259@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:46:25 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:49:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:49:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231749.n5NHnm3P031092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:49:47 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495399] Review Request: NotCourier-Sans-sfd-fonts - NotCourier Sans is a re-interpretation of Nimbus Mono. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231748.n5NHmUHU030948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495399 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:48:29 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:52:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:52:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231752.n5NHqNGA031891@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-23 13:52:22 EDT --- Blocking FE-legal for licensing clarification for "no modification permitted" -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:51:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:51:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] New: Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Summary: Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rdieter at math.unl.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/poppler-data/poppler-data.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/poppler-data/poppler-data-0.2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This package consists of encoding files for poppler. When installed, the encoding files enables poppler to correctly render CJK and Cyrillic properly. The contents here are currently bundled in the poppler package. Since uspstream distributes this part separately, it makes sense to package this (noarch) content separately as well. NOTE License: Redistributable, no modification permitted here, may require licensing exception similar to firmware. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:54:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:54:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231754.n5NHsoH2013886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:54:48 EDT --- Did you intend to make a CVS request? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:52:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:52:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231752.n5NHqUk1013510@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:53:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:53:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231753.n5NHruKZ013739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #52 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:53:55 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:56:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:56:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231756.n5NHuJES000467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:56:18 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:55:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:55:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231755.n5NHtawx014413@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 13:55:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 17:58:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:58:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507631] Review Request: rubygem-rubyzip - Ruby module for reading and writing zip files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231758.n5NHwjgP014844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507631 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-23 13:58:44 EDT --- Some notes for 0.9.1-1: * %define -> %global - Now Fedora suggests to use %global instead of %define. ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Pure_Ruby_packages https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define * License - When it is written as "is distributed under the same license as ruby", the license tag should be "GPLv2 or Ruby". * ruby(abi) Requires - All ruby related packages must have "Requires: ruby(abi) = 1.8". And for consistency I always recommend to also add "BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8". https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Ruby_Packaging_Guidelines * %check - As this gem file contains test/ directory, please add %check stage and execute some tests. ( And for this case, I guess expanding gem file under %_builddir at %prep is preferred, ref: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Gem_expand_stage_change also see: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mocha/rubygem-mocha.spec ) * %files - As you already defined %geminstdir, please use it also on %files - %defattr must be set before writing %doc entry. - The directory %geminstdir itself is not owned by this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:00:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:00:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231800.n5NI0xux015622@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 --- Comment #29 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-06-23 14:00:58 EDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > Did you intend to make a CVS request? Actually, yeah. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nss-ldapd Short Description: An nsswitch module which uses directory servers Owners: nalin Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:08:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:08:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491767] Review Request: nss-ldapd - An nsswitch module which uses directory servers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231808.n5NI8lN1003151@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491767 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #30 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:08:46 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:14:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:14:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506914] Request for adding Antico window manager to Fedora repo In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231814.n5NIEFT6018404@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506914 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:14:14 EDT --- Since there's no package to review, I'll mark this as not being ready. Please clear the whiteboard if you're ready to have a package reviewed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:17:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231817.n5NIHQxW019364@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568 --- Comment #38 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:17:21 EDT --- Is anything happening with this package? Any progress on fixing the issues? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:16:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:16:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231816.n5NIG198019058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-23 14:16:00 EDT --- SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-scribite/zikula-module-scribite-3.2-1.src.rpm SPEC URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/zikula-module-scribite/zikula-module-scribite.spec I checked the locations where the non-GPL licenses were discovered last time and did not find those files in the current release. Other issues were addressed and rpmlint was used to verify no errors in the SPEC and SRPM files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:22:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:22:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491545] Review Request: pynac - A modified version of GiNaC using Python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231822.n5NIMt7c006581@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491545 --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:22:54 EDT --- I don't see why not. I've already done most of the review work, so if you want to close this and reopen it later, it shouldn't be a problem. However, I don't see that this package has far to go. Really, the undefined-non-weak-symbol complaints are not so problematic that they'd block this review; this wouldn't be the first package with somewhat bizarre linking requirements. The other stuff shouldn't be a big deal. The python dependency issue might not even be an issue. I'd just like to see some progress being made on the sage packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:23:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:23:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 451771] Review Request: maximus - an addon for metacity In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231823.n5NINoft020967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451771 --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:23:49 EDT --- Is anyone reviewing this package? Why is it assigned with no fedora-review flag set? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:36:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:36:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435470] Review Request: zenoss - The Open Source Network Management System In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231836.n5NIax37024091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435470 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(chris at zenoss.com) | --- Comment #19 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:36:55 EDT --- It's been ages since anyone responded, and there's little chance that this will work on Fedora any time soon, so I'm going to go ahead and close this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506954] Review Request: uberftp - GridFTP-enabled ftp client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231838.n5NIctDR010600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506954 --- Comment #2 from Steve Traylen 2009-06-23 14:38:54 EDT --- After working on some other packages I realized some improvements. to these ones. Spec URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp.spec SRPM URL: http://cern.ch/steve.traylen/uberftp-rpms/uberftp-2.3-3.fc11.src.rpm rpmlint passes okay. Koji builds okay. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432298 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:44:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:44:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231844.n5NIi9Kf025586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231847.n5NIlGmw012492@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #14 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 14:47:12 EDT --- So, things didn't really work out with this package. I never managed to get far enough through my todo list to get back to this package, and now the whole fedora-ds thing has either been renamed or exists in another form as the 389-* packages. Given that, what should happen to this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 18:51:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:51:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231851.n5NIpTeY013437@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #15 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-06-23 14:51:28 EDT --- Renaming the package would be easy enough. AFAIK, the 389-* packages aren't even out yet, so this isn't really behind the times that much. I'll get a new version turned out that replaces references to Fedora DS with 389 DS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:06:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:06:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231906.n5NJ65dM017134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-23 15:06:04 EDT --- Built in rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:11:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:11:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231911.n5NJBKtb032081@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #9 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-23 15:11:19 EDT --- Hm, the source is however distributed with the GPL2 license text, and all source files say GPLv2+, so I went for that instead of the text on the homepage. Also, cddaheaderwidget.cpp is GPLv2. So what is the correct license for the spec file? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:21:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:21:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468570] Review Request: webmin - new package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231921.n5NJL0Vf001657@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468570 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(andy at gohanman.com | |) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 15:20:58 EDT --- It's been over half a year since Mamoru's comments and there's been no response. I guess I'll close this soon if there's no further progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:24:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:24:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231924.n5NJORnW002388@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |andrew at topdog.za.net --- Comment #1 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-23 15:24:26 EDT --- Hi Marcin, I am not able to sponsor your package but I can hopefully offer some useful help. * BuildRequires: gcc-c++ Is does not have to be declared - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 * Timestamps You should consider using use of INSTALL="install -p" when you make install -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231937.n5NJbQop023957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 15:37:24 EDT --- Well, my development box shows: 389-console.noarch : 389 Management Console 389-ds-base.i586 : 389 Directory Server (base) 389-ds-base-devel.i586 : Development libraries for 389 Directory Server so the 389 packages are definitely making it into the distro. koji shows shows eight source packages in the system: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/search?match=glob&type=package&terms=389* I expect they will continue to appear with successive pushes, although I admit I have no real knowledge of the plans for the 389-* packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:36:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:36:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 473348] Review Request: drraw - Web based presentation front-end for RRDtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231936.n5NJaNhH023836@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=473348 --- Comment #6 from Gabriel Somlo 2009-06-23 15:36:21 EDT --- also not an official review (yet) :) Installing your drraw-selinux subpackage didn't actually make any difference for me (stock up-to-date f10 install, selinux set to enforcing). The error logged to syslog advised me to run 'sealert -l something', which in turn recommended that I run 'chcon -t bin_t /usr/share/drraw/drraw.cgi', which fixed the issue (again, independently of whether the -selinux subpackage was installed or not). Digging through the selinux packaging wiki link from comment #1, I ended up at http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-selinux-list/2006-April/msg00115.html which seems to suggest that in your case a subpackage is unnecessary, and all you really need is: %post chcon -t bin_t %{_datadir}/%{name}/drraw.cgi and no need to worry about %postun at all. chcon is part of coreutils, so no need to drag in policycoreutils (probably no need for a -selinux subpackage at all). Once your package gets accepted, file bug against selinux-policy and request that your package be handled (again, as per the wiki page in comment #1) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:44:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:44:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] New: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Summary: Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-sqlalchemy0.5-0.5.3-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: SQLAlchemy is an Object Relational Mappper (ORM) that provides a flexible, high-level interface to SQL databases. Database and domain concepts are decoupled, allowing both sides maximum flexibility and power. SQLAlchemy provides a powerful mapping layer that can work as automatically or as manually as you choose, determining relationships based on foreign keys or letting you define the join conditions explicitly, to bridge the gap between database and domain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:49:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:49:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231949.n5NJnXEw008348@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 15:49:32 EDT --- php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:48:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231948.n5NJmAgu008117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-06-23 15:48:09 EDT --- This is the 0.5 package of python-migrate, designed to work alongside of 0.4 python-migrate for Fedora 11 and below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:48:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:48:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231948.n5NJmojt008233@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-06-23 15:48:49 EDT --- Hi Andrew, thanks for your comments. I added gcc-c++ to build the same RPM on OpenSuse Build Service. I know that it's not necessary (on Fedora), although it's not clear to me if having it is allowed or not. When I prepared this RPM I looked at a few other RPMS in Fedora. Some of them have "install -p" and some don't. I have no idea when it should be used, but I'll add it to the SPEC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:45:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:45:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231945.n5NJjTEv007576@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |toshio at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #1 from Luke Macken 2009-06-23 15:45:28 EDT --- This package is for the 0.5 release of SQLAlchemy, packaged to work alongside of python-sqlalchemy (0.4) on Fedora 11 and below. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:47:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:47:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] New: Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Summary: Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lmacken at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-migrate0.5.spec SRPM URL: http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-migrate0.5-0.5.3-3.fc10.src.rpm Description: Schema migration tools for SQLAlchemy designed to support an agile approach to database design and make it easier to keep development and production databases in sync as schema changes are required. It allows you to manage. atabase change sets and database repository versioning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:49:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231949.n5NJncuW026703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 15:49:37 EDT --- php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-lzf-1.5.2-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:52:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:52:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231952.n5NJqlLN027533@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 15:52:47 EDT --- php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 19:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:52:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906231952.n5NJqhZi009336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 15:52:42 EDT --- php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-geoip-1.0.7-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232009.n5NK9mf3013040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |493246 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:09:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:09:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232009.n5NK9mPY013018@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507703 --- Comment #18 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-23 16:09:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #17) > Yes. thank you too. So I need to remove > /usr/share/shutter/resources/module/File and > /usr/share/shutter/resources/module/Proc. But I think that > /usr/share/shutter/resources/module/Shutter should not be removed. Yes, thats correct File::Spec is in perl package Proc::Simple was submitted for review Shutter modules should stay -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] New: Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 Summary: Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Proc-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Proc-Simple-1.24-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The Proc::Simple package provides objects mimicing real-life processes from a user's point of view. Either external programs or perl subroutines can be launched and controlled as processes in the background. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:18:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:18:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232018.n5NKIOZH001005@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #1 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-23 16:18:23 EDT --- koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432455 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 453422] Review Request: songbird - Mozilla based multimedia player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232042.n5NKgAHx021496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453422 --- Comment #75 from David Halik 2009-06-23 16:42:03 EDT --- Thanks for the link, but most of what is in there I was already aware of. It looks like some makefile and cmake hacking will be needed to remove the extra ORIGIN path. I've tried multiple different tricks and I haven't been able to remove it. Unless someone else has a better idea of how to clean the path, I'm leaving this as is for now. Update 1.2.0 links: http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird-1.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm http://rpm.rutgers.edu/fedora/songbird.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 20:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:57:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232057.n5NKv46D025681@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net Flag| |fedora-review?, | |needinfo?(radford at blackbean | |.org) --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 16:57:03 EDT --- Quick review: 1. The licensing code for OFL, is OFL, not SIL http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal_considerations_for_fonts#Approved_font_licenses W: invalid-license SIL 2. Please do not rename the ttf, it makes cross-distro checks easier when everyone is using the unmodified upstream filename 3. I don't think you win a lot by creating the fontconfig file dynamically instead of putting it as Source1. So I'd advise against it. But I won't block the review on this 4. Please use a leading capital A in the summary inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: summary-not-capitalized a clean and usable latin fantasy font 5. Please correct the documentation end of lines inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/OFL.txt inkboy-fonts.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/FONTLOG.txt 6. Please correct the documentation encoding file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/inkboy-fonts-20070624/FONTLOG.txt You have examples of encoding and EOL fixup in the andika spec http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/devel/sil-andika-fonts/sil-andika-fonts.spec (of course you need to adapt the source encoding passed to iconv to your file) Apart from that, the spec seems clean and fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:02:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232102.n5NL2OTP027083@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list at redh | |at.com --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-23 17:02:22 EDT --- You don't have permission to access /spec/vemana2000-fonts.spec on this server (same for the srpm) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:38:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:38:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232138.n5NLcVis003353@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 Guido Grazioli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232137.n5NLbLdv003217@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #12 from Guido Grazioli 2009-06-23 17:37:19 EDT --- Tried to contact former packager via email but got no replies yet; current package owner is perex. Package was retired on 2008-04-10 ("doesn't compile with the latest kernel") between F8 and F9 releases. Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: awesfx New Branches: F-10 F-11 Owners: perex guidograzioli -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 21:55:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:55:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232155.n5NLtpMb025487@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 22:13:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:13:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232213.n5NMDtmT029025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 --- Comment #5 from Sven Lankes 2009-06-23 18:13:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) Thanks for looking at the package. An updated package is availabe at: Spec URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SPECS/skanlite.spec SRPM URL: http://sven.lank.es/Fedora/SRPM/skanlite-0.3-2.fc11.src.rpm > - Use %global instead of %define, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define Fixed > - Timestamp of Source0 does not match, see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Timestamps Fixed > - Do not use macros for %{__rm}, simply rm is ok Fixed > - Add TODO to %doc Not sure it adds any value for a user but still: Fixed > - Remove --vendor="" from desktop-file-install Fixed > - Mark the docs as %doc (although rpm should be smart enough to do this > automatically). Fixed > - Remove the empty common symlinks or make them point to something that is > actually there, as Mamoru already said in bug 479147. Not fixed - please see bug 491247. This is a general issue for all kde-packages - my /usr/share/HTML-directory has 117 dangling common-symlinks currently. The only "valid" fix I can think of here is removing the HTML-Documentation altogether and I would rather not do that. > Notes: > - The summary is a little weak. How about "Lightweight scanning program for > KDE"? Hmm - I've added lightweight. Adding "for KDE" doesn't really add any value to the summary IMO. > - Use wildcarts for the Languages in the documentation: > %{_kde4_docdir}/HTML/*/skanlite/ Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 22:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491946] Review Request: odfpy07 - compat package for odfpy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232224.n5NMOWLl030920@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491946 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-23 18:24:31 EDT --- Do we want to close this since mwlibs has been ported to the new odfpy? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 22:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232256.n5NMuThE018881@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-23 18:56:28 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > > You seem to have made a CVS request for the wrong package. That will teach me to copy/paste CVS requests. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream Short Description: CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files Owners: eseyman Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 23:07:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:07:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232307.n5NN7H9i021156@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jim Radford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(radford at blackbean | |.org) | --- Comment #2 from Jim Radford 2009-06-23 19:07:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > 1. The licensing code for OFL, is OFL, not SIL Fixed. > 2. Please do not rename the ttf, it makes cross-distro checks easier when > everyone is using the unmodified upstream filename Ok. Fixed. > 3. I don't think you win a lot by creating the fontconfig file dynamically > instead of putting it as Source1. So I'd advise against it. But I won't block > the review on this It's simpler for me to have a single file, so I'll leave that as is. > 4. Please use a leading capital A in the summary Fixed. > 5. Please correct the documentation end of lines Fixed. > 6. Please correct the documentation encoding Fixed. > Apart from that, the spec seems clean and fine Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 23:48:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:48:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232348.n5NNmljH015764@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-23 19:48:46 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 23 23:52:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:52:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906232352.n5NNqYRp030439@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 19:52:31 EDT --- I wanted to get back to this earlier, but I'm somewhat short on time these days. Here's a review. These days %global seems to be preferred over %define, though the differences are subtle and I don't think it makes any particular difference for the two %defines you're using. I think your Source0 should not be a URL if that URL is not valid, such as in the case where you're using a CVS snapshot. I'm not sure why you'd need "PECL:" in the Summary; the upstream site doesn't use that in its summary, and it gives the impression that the name of the package is "PECL". Your BuildRoot: tag is missing any mention of %release. One day soon BuildRoot can go away, but that's not quite here yet and in the meantime it needs to meet the guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag So only a few minor issues. * source files match upstream (compared manually). * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. ? summary could use a tweak. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. X build root is mising %release. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * BuildRequires are proper. * compiler flags are appropriate. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (F11, x86_64). * package installs properly. * debuginfo package looks complete. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: config(php-pecl-parsekit) = 1.2-2.CVS20090309.fc11 parsekit.so()(64bit) php-pecl(parsekit) = 1.2 php-pecl-parsekit = 1.2-2.CVS20090309.fc11 php-pecl-parsekit(x86-64) = 1.2-2.CVS20090309.fc11 = /bin/sh /usr/bin/pecl config(php-pecl-parsekit) = 1.2-2.CVS20090309.fc11 php(api) = 20041225 php(zend-abi) = 20060613 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. I have no way to test this. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * scriptlets are OK (php module registration). * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no static libraries. * no libtool .la files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 00:17:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:17:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240017.n5O0Ha1v002842@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 20:17:34 EDT --- OK, I took a look at the package and I only see one remaining issue: The LICENSE.fedora file isn't UTF-8; it contains 0xC6, which is probably an ISO-8859-15 character. I guess you've just dumped some email messages to a file, and the message with the character doesn't contain an encoding, but I would suggest that the file is intended to be read as a file, not a mail folder, and so should be UTF-8. Can you convert it before you import? The only general advice I can give regarding the license issue is to get everyone to include proper copyright and license statements somewhere in each source file. I could see authors in the previous century being ignorant of the need to properly license their code, but these days there's really no excuse. If you want more specific advice, though, you're welcome to contact fedora-legal-list at redhat.com. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 00:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506056] Review Request: zikula-module-scribite - The scribite! module for Zikula allows integration of various text editors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240050.n5O0ob84027245@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506056 --- Comment #5 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-23 20:50:36 EDT --- xinha still has CC licenses. just one example: ./javascript/scribite_editors/xinha/images/tango/COPYING: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 01:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240105.n5O15m3F011899@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |487510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 01:42:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:42:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240142.n5O1ggfB018177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-23 21:42:41 EDT --- The more I think about it, the more black and white it is ... this content can't possibly be acceptable for fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 01:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240148.n5O1mqYK005136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 Bug 498846 depends on bug 498845, which changed state. Bug 498845 Summary: Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-23 21:48:51 EDT --- This fails to build for me in the %install section: * Installing *source* package 'RM2' ... ** R ** preparing package for lazy loading Error in loadNamespace(i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths())) : there is no package called 'mvtnorm' Error : package 'msm' could not be loaded ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'RM2' Does this need a build dependency on R-mvtnorm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 02:02:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 22:02:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240202.n5O22vlc007881@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-23 22:02:56 EDT --- Gosh, I've never dealt with content before. Re-reading, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Content_Licenses " The one exception is that we permit content (but only content) which restricts modification as long as that is the only restriction." So my take is that we're still a go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:04:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240304.n5O34fCj003025@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #10 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-23 23:04:40 EDT --- Uhmm, I say contact upstream and ask if it is 2 or 3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:05:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:05:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240305.n5O35FUv021963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Joseph Smidt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240305.n5O35GQq021996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 504430, which changed state. Bug 504430 Summary: Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:03:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:03:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240303.n5O33sXl021400@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Chess Griffin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chess at chessgriffin.com --- Comment #11 from Chess Griffin 2009-06-23 23:03:52 EDT --- Hello- I cannot give you an official review, but here are a few minor nits: You have "Source:" and "Patch0:" (one has 0 and one does not). The documentation[1][2] references "Source0:" even there is only one source download. Either way, they should be consistent, so you may want to change "Source:" to "Source0:". Additionally, (and this is a very minor quibble), you have some parts of the spec file with one blank line between sections and other parts with two. Personally, I would stick with one style or the other. It just looks cleaner. FWIW, I would love to see this package in Fedora. :-) [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CreatingPackageHowTo [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:07:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:07:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240307.n5O37lRn003966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #11 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-23 23:07:46 EDT --- because of this clause "either version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version." (sorry that was supposed to be posted it in the above message) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:18:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240318.n5O3Ii2T005923@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:19:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240319.n5O3J1I3024649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240352.n5O3qPVg030912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #9 from Chris Bagwell 2009-06-23 23:52:22 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349189) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349189) Updated spec to 0.9.3 release My eee pc was feeling sluggish so I went ahead and updated spec file to support latest release of eee-control. This will install a /etc/eee-control.conf that enables all features; even without custom kernel module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 03:55:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 23:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487044] Review Request: eee-control - Asus Eee PC hardware control and configuration tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240355.n5O3tFcB013036@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487044 --- Comment #10 from Chris Bagwell 2009-06-23 23:55:14 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349190) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349190) Spec File for 0.9.3 release Previous attachement was SRPM containing needed additional source files... Here is spec alone for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 05:33:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:33:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240533.n5O5XOms031231@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |oget.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-24 01:33:22 EDT --- How about using "alternatives" for lzma stuff? "alternatives" works very well for packages which use it. I just found this bug. It would have been nice if the lzma maintainer didn't ignore my emails about this subject in the last one and a half months but I'm glad someone started the work. Jindrich, according to the guidelines there has to be a . between 5 and beta. Also, please make the description span the 80 columns (as much as possible). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 05:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] New: Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-coderay.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-coderay-0.8.312-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: CodeRay is a Ruby library for syntax highlighting. I try to make CodeRay easy to use and intuitive, but at the same time fully featured, complete, fast and efficient. $ rpmlint /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rubygem-coderay-0.8.312-1.fc11.noarch.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rubygem-coderay-0.8.312-1.fc11.src.rpm SPECS/rubygem-coderay.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432884 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 05:51:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:51:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507762] New: Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507762 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jan.klepek at hp.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gravatar.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-gravatar-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars, also features some hooks and misc other related goodies. rpmlint: $ rpmlint -i /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/SRPMS/rubygem-gravatar-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm /home/makerpm/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/rubygem-gravatar-1.0-1.fc11.noarch.rpm SPECS/rubygem-gravatar.spec 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432908 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 05:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240553.n5O5rdPT021372@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507761, 507762 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 05:53:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:53:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240553.n5O5rdxn021395@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 05:53:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 01:53:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507762] Review Request: rubygem-gravatar - Gravatar is a class to represent GRAVATAR[http://gravatar.com] avatars In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240553.n5O5rese021417@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507762 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |499959 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:01:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240601.n5O61X6u023030@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 02:01:32 EDT --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/vemana2000-fonts.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/vemana2000-fonts-1.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:09:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:09:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240609.n5O69A5H024360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 02:09:09 EDT --- pycolumnize-0.3.2-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pycolumnize-0.3.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:13:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:13:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240613.n5O6DqkT025645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #13 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-24 02:13:50 EDT --- - removed FE-NEEDSPONSOR as David is sponsored now by Jochen Schmitt @david: ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:16:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:16:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240616.n5O6GbWx026322@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 02:16:36 EDT --- I will take this one. Instead I will appreciate it if you would review my review requests (bug 506168 or bug 507649, both are rubygem related) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:40:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:40:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] New: Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 Summary: Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-ctags.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-ctags-1.0.5-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A python wrapper to read tags library -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:46:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:46:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506168] Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240646.n5O6k6br032642@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240646.n5O6kRZN014778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 06:51:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:51:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240651.n5O6pjbx015847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #12 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-24 02:51:44 EDT --- I've asked for a statement by upstream, let's see what he says. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:00:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:00:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506168] Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240700.n5O703Zs003362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 03:00:02 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1415422 - rpmlint message for SRPM and for RPM. rubygem-allison.src: W: strange-permission rubygem-allison-2.0.3-allison-path-symlink.patch 0600 ==> Fix this + source files match upstream url da73e1dc3856ec3c0fef09a8f5f390743303ed69 allison-2.0.3.gem + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: This is first time I am reviewing ruby package. 1)Ruby packaging guidelines suggest gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0} whereas in SPEC its gem install --local --install-dir $(pwd)%{gemdir} --force --rdoc -V %{SOURCE0} ==> Though its same if you like can you use %{buildroot} instead $(pwd) 2) Not sure but see Documentation files getting installed at /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/allison-2.0.3. Can they go to %doc? Got confused how following got evaluated for main rpm package %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:06:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:06:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] New: Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 Summary: Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kushaldas at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-daemon.spec SRPM URL: http://kushal.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-daemon-1.4.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This library implements the well-behaved daemon specification of PEP 3143, "Standard daemon process library". Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1433003 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240708.n5O78rxl005340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:15:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:15:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506168] Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240715.n5O7FM7a006829@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 03:15:20 EDT --- Thank you! (In reply to comment #1) > rubygem-allison-2.0.3-allison-path-symlink.patch 0600 > ==> Fix this - Will fix > This is first time I am reviewing ruby package. > 1)Ruby packaging guidelines suggest > gem install --local --install-dir %{buildroot}%{gemdir} --force %{SOURCE0} > whereas in SPEC its > gem install --local --install-dir $(pwd)%{gemdir} --force --rdoc -V %{SOURCE0} > ==> Though its same if you like can you use %{buildroot} instead $(pwd) - At this case $(pwd) is %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version} != %{builddir}. Now I have submitted a proposal to move the directory to expand the Gem file from %buildroot to %_builddir, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Gem_expand_stage_change Now I am waiting for someone to comment on my draft. > 2) Not sure but see Documentation files getting installed at > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/allison-2.0.3. Can they go to %doc? > Got confused how following got evaluated for main rpm package > %doc %{geminstdir}/[A-Z]* - This is usual for RubyGem packages. We usually don't move these document files (such as LICENSE or so) to %_defaultdocdir because $ gem contents expects there (and Rakefile won't work if it is moved from %geminstdir) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-allison Short Description: A modern, pretty RDoc template Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505848] Review Request: php-pecl-lzf - Extension to handle LZF de/compression In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240719.n5O7Jgeb021777@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505848 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #15 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 03:19:41 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:19:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:19:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240719.n5O7JpII007450@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 03:19:50 EDT --- Now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:20:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:20:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506238] Review Request: php-pecl-geoip - Extension to map IP addresses to geographic places In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240720.n5O7K3dG022162@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506238 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:25:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240725.n5O7PYBZ008984@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 03:25:32 EDT --- aah! I got confused here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=3643 What is need of this package in F11 and below? I see python-sqlalchemy-0.5.4-1.p2.fc11 as latest package in F-11 I think this package will not be needed then. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:28:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:28:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240728.n5O7SRj2023855@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 03:28:26 EDT --- What is need of this package in F11 and below? I see python-migrate-0.5.3-1.fc11 as latest package in F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240730.n5O7U6FN009848@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #19 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 03:30:03 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-3.fc11.src.rpm Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:31:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240731.n5O7VBxX010145@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rpandit at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:31:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:31:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240731.n5O7VRCL024682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #9 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 03:31:26 EDT --- Will review -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:38:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:38:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507649] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240738.n5O7cuAY026006@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507649 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:39:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:39:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240739.n5O7dcH4026089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 --- Comment #1 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-06-24 03:39:36 EDT --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1433035 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:37:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:37:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240737.n5O7bcWc025819@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Terje R??sten changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |terjeros at phys.ntnu.no --- Comment #13 from Terje R??sten 2009-06-24 03:37:37 EDT --- Nice app, thanks for doing the integration! A bit unfair to report bugs before the package is approved, however I tried to rip to flac using the FLAC profile, however the file ended up as an ogg file (sic!). Could you please have a look? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:53:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:53:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499959] Review Request: redmine - redmine In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240753.n5O7r89Z029384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499959 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #14 from David Hannequin 2009-06-24 03:53:07 EDT --- Hello, Sorry for my absence but I do not have access to the Net from home due to my move to another region of France. I always work on the Redmine rpm. See you soon with a new spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 07:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240757.n5O7vKn7030305@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 03:57:19 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1433042 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 874e40daa053644e2899f7def181a252087003e3 python-daemon-1.4.6.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) I don't get why you need version_info_fix.patch. Better do same in spec as sed -i -e "s|#!/usr/bin/env python||" daemon/version/version_info.py 2) Should use %global instead %define APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240804.n5O84IKj017397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:04:17 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1433037 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 999283046710d37f93b646bf3e7cadde7b3d2619 python-ctags-1.0.5.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Package python-ctags-1.0.5-1.fc12.i586 => Provides: _readtags.so Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libpthread.so.0 libpthread.so.0(GLIBC_2.0) libpython2.6.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.6 rtld(GNU_HASH) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) Better use summary from PKG-INFO 2) Should use %global instead %define APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:11:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:11:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240811.n5O8Bgtf019412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 04:11:40 EDT --- http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/crunchyfrog/crunchyfrog.spec http://ivazquez.fedorapeople.org/packages/crunchyfrog/crunchyfrog-0.3.4-1.src.rpm I am reviewing ivazquez's files: 1. Why is %{dist} missing from srpm ? 2. License snippet from code says "# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or # (at your option) any later version. " that means GPLv3+ 3. may you check http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets & http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Desktop_files for icon also you need hicolor-* dependency .. may you check the spec file in #8 Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:16:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:16:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240816.n5O8GpN0020537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:16:49 EDT --- any plans to push this as stable updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:17:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:17:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240817.n5O8H3KZ002700@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:17:02 EDT --- any plans to push this as stable updates? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:19:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:19:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 483453] Review Request: perl-MooseX-Method - Method declaration with type checking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240819.n5O8Jvxh021065@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483453 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:19:55 EDT --- ping? Will close this as NOTABUG if reporter will not reply within a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240818.n5O8INqa020768@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:18:22 EDT --- any plans to push this as stable updates? Or you can close this ticket as package is built for all requested branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503592] Review Request: python-sprox - A package for creation of web widgets directly from database schema In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240822.n5O8MPuZ003997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503592 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:22:23 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484511] Review Request: crunchyfrog - A multi-engine SQL client and database front-end In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240821.n5O8Lcma003879@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484511 --- Comment #11 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 04:21:37 EDT --- May you check missing requires and buildrequires build fails: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1433075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:02:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:02:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240802.n5O82di6017110@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 04:02:38 EDT --- For 0.8.312-1: * %define -> %global - We now recommend to use %global instead of %global: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define * License - From lib/term/ansicolor.rb, the license tag should be "GPLv2" * Moving some document files - Would you explain why you want to move README or so from %geminstdir to %gemdir/doc ? Note that $ gem contents coderay expects that those (README or so) files are under %geminstdir. * %files - As you already defined %geminstdir, please use it also in %files instead of using %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ ! Summary ---------------------------------------------------------------- I try to make CodeRay easy to use and intuitive, .... ---------------------------------------------------------------- - It is ambiguous what "I" mean here... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:23:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:23:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240823.n5O8NIxg022046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-24 04:23:17 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:46:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:46:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240846.n5O8khml027488@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2009-06-24 04:46:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-ctags Short Description: A python wrapper to read tags library Owners: kushal Branches: F-11 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:46:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:46:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240846.n5O8kOQa009390@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #12 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-24 04:46:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > > any plans to push this as stable updates? This was done on June 21 (Update ID: FEDORA-2009-4663). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:45:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:45:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240845.n5O8jsjS009223@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 Kushal Das changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Kushal Das 2009-06-24 04:45:53 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: python-daemon Short Description: Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process Owners: kushal Branches: F-11 InitialCC: kushal -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 08:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 04:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240848.n5O8mIrd027948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 --- Comment #6 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-24 04:48:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > any plans to push this as stable updates? Done on June 21 (Update ID:FEDORA-2009-4425). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 09:02:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:02:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240902.n5O92UCB013004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 Bug 493246 depends on bug 493250, which changed state. Bug 493250 Summary: Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 09:02:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:02:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493250] Review Request: perl-Goo-Canvas -- Goo::Canvas Perl interface to the GooCanvas In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906240902.n5O92T1E012966@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493250 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #46 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 05:02:26 EDT --- Okay, now closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241030.n5OAUgvD016763@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241030.n5OAURtP016705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 06:30:26 EDT --- package naming -- done api-subpackage -- done [rakesh at dhcp7-204 SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11.x86_64]$ tree . `-- usr |-- lib64 | `-- gcj | `-- SevenZip | |-- SevenZip-4.65.jar.db | `-- SevenZip-4.65.jar.so `-- share |-- doc | `-- SevenZip-4.65 | |-- 7zFormat.txt | |-- Methods.txt | |-- history.txt | `-- lzma.txt `-- java |-- SevenZip-4.65.jar `-- SevenZip.jar -> SevenZip-4.65.jar 8 directories, 8 files Symlink between project name and commonly used jar file name done jar files going to %{_javadir} - done package naming - fails I am confused about wether SevenZip would be right name for this packages .. will confirm in some time. spec file language -- sane spec file - legible [rakesh at dhcp7-204 SPECS]$ md5sum lzma465.tar.bz2 29d5ffd03a5a3e51aef6a74e9eafb759 lzma465.tar.bz2 [rakesh at dhcp7-204 SPECS]$ md5sum SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11.src/lzma465.tar.bz2 29d5ffd03a5a3e51aef6a74e9eafb759 SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11.src/lzma465.tar.bz2 md5sum matches -- done Compiles -- successfully Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1433244 rpmlint output - mentioned buildrequires - fine %files - fine -doc package - fine Summary: naming .. I am in doubt will confirm in some time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:37:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:37:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241037.n5OAbw0Q001072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #23 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 06:37:54 EDT --- Sorry for keeping this for long wait .. I reviwed it again and found everything fine .. but while running first as root it fails: [rakesh at dhcp7-204 noarch]$ cerebro /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cerebro/teleporter.py:17: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead import sys, time, select, os, sha, threading Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/cerebro", line 71, in filemode='a') File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/logging/__init__.py", line 1358, in basicConfig hdlr = FileHandler(filename, mode) File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/logging/__init__.py", line 790, in __init__ stream = self._open() File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/logging/__init__.py", line 810, in _open stream = open(self.baseFilename, self.mode) IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/cerebro' [rakesh at dhcp7-204 noarch]$ [rakesh at dhcp7-204 noarch]$ [rakesh at dhcp7-204 noarch]$ Even later as root ? [rakesh at dhcp7-204 noarch]$ su - Password: [root at dhcp7-204 ~]# cerebro /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/cerebro/teleporter.py:17: DeprecationWarning: the sha module is deprecated; use the hashlib module instead import sys, time, select, os, sha, threading Interface msh0 was not found! Aborting. May you update with latest updates if any ? Thanks, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:39:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:39:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457279] Review Request: cerebro - Cerebro provides mesh network services and presence information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241039.n5OAdQCD018185@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457279 --- Comment #24 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 06:39:25 EDT --- So it is expecting .. I guess .. but it is fail sane way for non root users ??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:42:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241042.n5OAgk9W018989@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-24 06:42:45 EDT --- built and on its way to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469474] Review Request: sovix - A website revision system In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241041.n5OAf5fw002212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469474 vivek shah changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(fedora at christoph- | |wickert.de) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241055.n5OAtX95021850@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Alexey Torkhov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |atorkhov at gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Alexey Torkhov 2009-06-24 06:55:32 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > peter: I think we try to avoid unnecessary capitalization, right? that's why I > used sk1. According to name guidelines, package should be called after how upstream call the project, and they call it "sK1". https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 10:59:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:59:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241059.n5OAxuV3006033@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-24 06:59:55 EDT --- Builds fine. Package looks fine to me except .. add it a script or few commands in spec itself via which you extracted tarball from cvs and removed unnecessary files. Thanks, package naming -- done api-subpackage -- done debuginfo -- done package naming - fine spec file language -- sane spec file - legible md5sum matches -- done Compiles -- successfully Build on koji rpmlint output - mentioned buildrequires - fine %files - fine -doc package - fine -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 11:00:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] New: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mi at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree-0.08-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Simple XML tree builder. Dependency for flickr.com API module. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 11:11:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:11:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] New: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mi at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-Flickr-API.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-Flickr-API-1.01-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Perl interface to the Flickr API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 11:13:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:13:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] New: Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Summary: Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mi at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-Flickr-Upload.spec SRPM URL: http://v3.sk/~xyzz/rpm/f11/perl-Flickr-Upload-1.32-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Flickr upload tool and perl module using flickr API -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 11:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 07:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241138.n5OBc23L014753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 --- Comment #8 from Iain Arnell 2009-06-24 07:38:01 EDT --- yep - thanks for the reminder - it's pushed now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:44:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:44:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241244.n5OCi782028454@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:47:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:47:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241247.n5OCld0D013011@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:46:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:46:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241246.n5OCk5ZG029293@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:56:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241256.n5OCu4LG031970@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #24 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-24 08:56:02 EDT --- *** Bug 507649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:56:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507649] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241256.n5OCu3t3031878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507649 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-24 08:56:02 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 459892 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:56:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:56:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507649] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241256.n5OCuua6032131@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507649 --- Comment #3 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-24 08:56:55 EDT --- Sorry, but not everyone has as much time to pay attention to as much things at a time as you have, but closing my review request as a duplicate of a new review request is just wrong. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 13:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:09:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] New: Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Summary: Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: hdegoede at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/camorama.spec SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/camorama-0.19-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A simple Gnome webcam viewer, with the ability to apply some video effects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 12:55:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 08:55:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241255.n5OCtsrL016076@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE | Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-24 08:55:52 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mocha Short Description: Mocking and stubbing library Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 13:18:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:18:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241318.n5ODIQGO005617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 --- Comment #17 from Chris St. Pierre 2009-06-24 09:18:22 EDT --- New spec file: http://fedora-ds-graph.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/fedora-ds-graph/trunk/389-ds-graph.spec?revision=52 New SRPM: http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/fedora-ds-graph/389-ds-graph-1.1.2-1.fc10.src.rpm As you can see, I'm still on F10, where the package names haven't been updated yet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 14:00:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:00:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241400.n5OE00Mq017680@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #3 from R P Herrold 2009-06-24 09:59:59 EDT --- File attach bit me -- this should preceed my attachment Many other packages need R-mvtnorm as well: R-mvtnorm is needed by (installed) R-pscl-1.03-1orc.01.x86_64 R-mvtnorm is needed by (installed) R-sampleSelection-0.6.4-1orc.noarch R-mvtnorm is needed by (installed) R-vcd-1.2.4-1orc.01.noarch R-mvtnorm is needed by (installed) R-colorspace-1.0.1-1orc.10.x86_64 There is also a needed R and BR dependency on: R-msm to pass %check The R2spec tool, in Fedora, produces a much more useful URL, and a nice set of pointers to BR's and R's --- I attach .spec's for R-msm, R-mvtnorm, and a revised one for RM2 made using it for comparison, which fedora may prefer to use -- Russ herrold -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 13:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241359.n5ODx3CS000646@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #2 from R P Herrold 2009-06-24 09:59:02 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349240) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349240) R-mvtnorm spec file -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 14:00:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241400.n5OE0ikc018292@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #4 from R P Herrold 2009-06-24 10:00:43 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349243) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349243) R-RM2 spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 14:01:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:01:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241401.n5OE1c4s018558@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #5 from R P Herrold 2009-06-24 10:01:37 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349244) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349244) R-msm spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 14:08:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:08:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507849] New: Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507849 Summary: Review Request: anjal - email client for small screen devices Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 507837 Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anerley.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/anjal-0.1.0-1.20090624git0424e38.fc11.src.rpm An email client for netbooks which uses evolution-data-server as a backend -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 14:29:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:29:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241429.n5OETqdv009690@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #12 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-24 10:29:49 EDT --- I don't think alternatives is correct when one package is a superset/(eventual) replacement of the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 15:56:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:56:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241556.n5OFuoLM016800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wwoods at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Will Woods 2009-06-24 11:56:49 EDT --- Look in http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/ - there's http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-2.0-2.fc10.src.rpm, which should be fine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 16:02:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:02:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241602.n5OG22Lq002664@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #6 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-24 12:02:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Builds fine. > > Package looks fine to me except .. add it a script or few commands in spec > itself via which you extracted tarball from cvs and removed unnecessary files. > Thanks, Actually that is what the Source9: %{name}-snapshot.sh is for. I find it easier to use this script to fetch the sources. I remove the unnecessary files (the bundled prebuilt .so files) in %prep so that the snapshot tarball matches what upstream gives. Also I'd like to keep the fetch script as plain as possible and do my business in the spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 16:00:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241600.n5OG0urG017762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #6 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-24 12:00:55 EDT --- Thanks for the update. I'll have a look at it this week-end. That package (R-RM2) depends on R-msm, which is now available in Fedora (but was not at the time I started with R-RM2). Now that I gained experience on packaging R-msm, I'll retrofit it (as well as your feedback) into the R-RM2 packaging. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 16:10:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:10:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241610.n5OGArRr020614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #3 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-24 12:10:52 EDT --- Thanks for the review! SevenZip source tree is being copied to other programs' tarballs. frinika (bug #492203) is one of them. I made it a separate package as a Fedora requirement. On the other hand this source tree of lzma has the lzma framework for C/C++/C sharp/Java. The former two are already covered in the current lzma package we have in Fedora. I am not much interested in C sharp, I am sure only very few of us are. That leaves the Java, which is what this package is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 16:37:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:37:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 435724] Review Request: fedora-ds-graph - an rrdtool-based graphing utility for Fedora Directory Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241637.n5OGbQQs026138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435724 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #18 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-24 12:37:25 EDT --- Hallo, I want to notify you, that the Fedora DS was rename to 389-ds, so it may be nice, if you can rename your package into 389-ds-graph. The reason, why the ds was renamed, was to clarified, that the 389-ds is not a fedora specific product. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 16:38:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:38:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241638.n5OGcFKJ011624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #20 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-24 12:38:14 EDT --- Thanks for the update but there are a few problems: * tvtk_doc.desktop and Mayavi.desktop are identical. I don't think this was intentional. * Could you please add GenericName's to these .desktop files? (KDE uses GenericName, Gnome uses Comment) * You used the desktop-database scriptlets from http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#desktop-database But those are for mime-types. What you need is to use the icon-cache scriptlets: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache (Don't forget to remove the Requires(post), Requires(postun) you added.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 16:58:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 12:58:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241658.n5OGwb2T030452@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #14 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-24 12:58:36 EDT --- Terje, I have ripped 2 cds testing and they came out as flac files.. maybe check your settings ad report to upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 17:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] New: Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Summary: Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/ldd3_pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/ldd3_pdf-3.0-1.src.rpm Description: The third edition of Linux Device Drivers, by Jonathan Corbet, Alessandro Rubini, and Greg Kroah-Hartman This is the PDF version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 17:25:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:25:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507912] New: Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 Summary: Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/alp.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/alp-1.0-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Advanced Linux Programming is intended for the programmer already familiar with the C programming language. Authors Alex Samuel, Jeffrey Oldham, and Mark Mitchell of CodeSourcery, LLC take a tutorial approach and teach the most important concepts and power features of the GNU/Linux system in application programs. This is the PDF version of the book as well as the example code listings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 17:30:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 13:30:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] New: Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 Summary: Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: steve at lonetwin.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/javanotes.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/javanotes-5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: The fifth edition of Introduction to Programming Using Java, a free, on-line textbook on introductory programming, which uses Java as the language of instruction. This book is directed mainly towards beginning programmers, although it might also be useful for experienced programmers who want to learn something about Java. It is certainly not meant to provide complete coverage of the Java language. This is the html version, start with index.html in the main directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:06:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:06:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241806.n5OI6VH1001918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Jeff Ortel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #33 from Jeff Ortel 2009-06-24 14:06:27 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: python-suds New Branches: F-11 Owners: jortel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241808.n5OI83ON014907@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-24 14:08:02 EDT --- License version is not mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing so tagging FE-LEGAL for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIBkte003408@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|504430 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIBrrX003474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|505017 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIBwEj003527@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|494845 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505017] Review Request: eclipse-veditor - Eclipse-based Verilog/VHDL plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIBqEv003444@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505017 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|505154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIBkGL003376@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|505154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 494845] Review Request: xdrfile - A small C-library for reading and writing GROMACS trr and xtc files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIBvJX003494@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494845 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|505154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:10:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:10:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241810.n5OIAChS003014@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #27 from Paul Lange 2009-06-24 14:10:08 EDT --- flickrnet is available on x86_64. error CS0006: cannot find metadata file `/usr/lib/mono/flickrnet/FlickrNet.dll' The file is located at '/usr/lib64/mono/flickrnet/FlickrNet.dll' on x86_64. I think the flickrnet pkg-config file is right so I'm not sure what is the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:12:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241812.n5OICGaW003595@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mitr at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:08:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:08:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241808.n5OI8D4b002233@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #1 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-24 14:08:12 EDT --- License version is not mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing so tagging FE-LEGAL for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:12:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241812.n5OICADV016002@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|498845 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505154] Tracker for reviews of Science and Technology related packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIB2vE015674@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507660 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498845] Review Request: R-msm - Multi-state Markov and hidden Markov models in continuous time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241812.n5OIC9ue015958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498845 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|505154 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:11:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:11:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241811.n5OIB1nH015642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jussi.lehtola at iki.fi Blocks| |505154 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241813.n5OIDsUl016250@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:13:50 EDT --- cvs done. Note that if this was blocked in koji, you will need to file a rel-eng ticket to unblock it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:15:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506168] Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241815.n5OIFHuf004756@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:15:16 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:17:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:17:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241817.n5OIHVLT005074@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? | --- Comment #25 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:17:29 EDT --- Can you guys work out which of these are going to be used and who is going to maintain? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:16:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:16:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241816.n5OIGX4q004968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:16:32 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:18:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:18:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241818.n5OIINFb017336@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:18:22 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507773] Review Request: python-daemon - Library to implement a well-behaved Unix daemon process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241820.n5OIKPOq005991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507773 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:20:24 EDT --- cvs done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466496] Review Request: python-suds - A lightweight python soap web services client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241821.n5OILWBf018232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466496 Kevin Fenzi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #34 from Kevin Fenzi 2009-06-24 14:21:30 EDT --- There already is a F-11 branch. Make sure you do 'cvs update -d' to pick up the new branches. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241832.n5OIWo5g008980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507761 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:32:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241832.n5OIWnVA008949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504469 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-24 14:32:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > For 0.8.312-1: > > * %define -> %global > - We now recommend to use %global instead of %global: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/global_preferred_over_define - Fixed > * License > - From lib/term/ansicolor.rb, the license tag should be > "GPLv2" > - lib/term/ansicolor.rb will be provided by package rubygem-term-ansicolor ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 ). i have added ruby(term-ansicolor) into requires and during %install is directory lib/term removed. I give there LGPLv2 license as this license is specified on web of project and in LICENSE file > * Moving some document files > - Would you explain why you want to move README or so from %geminstdir > to %gemdir/doc ? > Note that $ gem contents coderay expects that those (README or so) files > are under %geminstdir. - - Fixed > * %files > - As you already defined %geminstdir, please use it also in %files > instead of using %{gemdir}/gems/%{gemname}-%{version}/ - Fixed > ! Summary > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > I try to make CodeRay easy to use and intuitive, .... > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > - It is ambiguous what "I" mean here... - Fixed Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-coderay.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/rubygem-coderay-0.8.312-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:44:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:44:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487097] Review Request: ReviewBoard - web based code review tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241844.n5OIiQP5022739@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487097 --- Comment #10 from Cristian Ciupitu 2009-06-24 14:44:24 EDT --- By the way, Review Board 1.0 was just released (http://www.review-board.org/news/2009/06/20/review-board-10-released), so maybe a package for 1.0 should be created. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 18:43:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241843.n5OIhme0011698@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:16:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:16:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241916.n5OJGqbj030475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:16:51 EDT --- pokerth-0.7-5.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:17:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:17:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502851] Review Request: pokerth - A Texas-Holdem poker game In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241917.n5OJH1oB030545@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502851 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.7-5.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241918.n5OJIc66031119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:18:37 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6808 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:19:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:19:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506168] Review Request: rubygem-allison - A modern, pretty RDoc template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241919.n5OJJoGc021040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506168 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 15:19:49 EDT --- Rebuilt on all branches, submitted push requests on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:20:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:20:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241920.n5OJKc8c021687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:20:37 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc11.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6854 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241918.n5OJIh5F020834@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:18:42 EDT --- perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-TheSchwartz'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6815 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:27:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241927.n5OJRP44024485@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:27:24 EDT --- ytree-1.92-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:25:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241925.n5OJPeOA024004@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.00-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:27:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:27:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241927.n5OJRIHk024439@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:27:17 EDT --- perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:26:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:26:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241926.n5OJQl5G002986@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:26:46 EDT --- healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241926.n5OJQxrB003068@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:26:58 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:25:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:25:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505447] Review Request: perl-HTML-FillInForm - Populates HTML Forms with data In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241925.n5OJPZG9002642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505447 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:25:34 EDT --- perl-HTML-FillInForm-2.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:26:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:26:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241926.n5OJQqg0003029@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |0.9.6.1-3.fc10 Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241927.n5OJR4Jf003102@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1.7-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:27:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:27:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241927.n5OJRUuv003213@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.92-3.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:32:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:32:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241932.n5OJWOD2026539@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:32:24 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241931.n5OJVdow026377@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.9.2-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:28:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:28:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241928.n5OJSB0j024928@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:28:10 EDT --- perl-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-Sub-WrapPackages'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6841 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:31:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:31:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241931.n5OJVY4r005046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:31:33 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:32:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:32:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241932.n5OJWTis005199@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.7-2.fc10 |0.1.7-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:33:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241933.n5OJX4IQ005320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1.7-2.fc11 |0.1.7-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:32:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:32:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503278] Review Request: nekobee-dssi - Acid sounds synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241932.n5OJWxpG026704@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503278 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:32:59 EDT --- nekobee-dssi-0.1.7-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:37:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:37:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241937.n5OJb3g9028868@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:37:02 EDT --- perl-File-Flock-2008.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241936.n5OJaqZi028821@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:36:51 EDT --- python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241933.n5OJXi9N027305@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:33:43 EDT --- python-gnutls-1.1.8-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241937.n5OJbvYj029134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:37:56 EDT --- perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:33:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:33:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241933.n5OJXnJ6027351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.8-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:37:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:37:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241937.n5OJbLuV028926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.96-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:36:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:36:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241936.n5OJaMdQ028598@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:36:21 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qelectrotech'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-6814 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:37:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:37:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497786] Review Request: perl-JSON-RPC - Perl implementation of JSON-RPC 1.1 protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241937.n5OJbGhE007116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497786 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:37:15 EDT --- perl-JSON-RPC-0.96-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241939.n5OJdEa1007612@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:39:12 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:36:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:36:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503189] Review Request: python-gnutls - Python wrapper for the GNUTLS library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241936.n5OJauj2007011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503189 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.8-3.fc11 |1.1.8-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:38:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:38:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505957] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Highlight-Perl-Improved - Highlighting of Perl Syntactical Structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241938.n5OJc2ME007317@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505957 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.01-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:37:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:37:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499103] Review Request: perl-File-Flock - File locking with flock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241937.n5OJb7Gt007072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499103 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2008.01-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241939.n5OJd6MZ007567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:39:05 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6796 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:42:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241942.n5OJgicD031435@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:42:43 EDT --- healpy-0.9.6.1-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:39:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:39:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241939.n5OJdXXa030040@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.2-2.fc11 |0.9.2-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:39:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:39:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241939.n5OJdT9D030008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:39:28 EDT --- xsynth-dssi-0.9.2-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:39:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:39:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503263] Review Request: xsynth-dssi - Classic-analog style software synthesizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241939.n5OJdIho029957@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503263 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.2-2.fc10 |0.9.2-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:42:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:42:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241942.n5OJgAZb031157@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:42:09 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-0.2.rc2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qelectrotech'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6907 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:41:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:41:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241941.n5OJfVgL030981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:41:30 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6906 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241942.n5OJgR47031324@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:42:26 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6848 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241944.n5OJijen009746@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:44:44 EDT --- ytree-1.92-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:42:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:42:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504430] Review Request: healpy - A python wrapper of the healpix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241942.n5OJgnjg009145@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504430 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.9.6.1-3.fc10 |0.9.6.1-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:44:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:44:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502986] Review Request: ytree- A filemanager similar to XTree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241944.n5OJinW6009778@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502986 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.92-3.fc10 |1.92-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:44:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:44:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241944.n5OJiBgp009608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.59-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:40:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:40:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507943] New: Review Request: moblin-gtk-egine - GTK engine for Moblin Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: moblin-gtk-egine - GTK engine for Moblin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507943 Summary: Review Request: moblin-gtk-egine - GTK engine for Moblin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-gtk-engine.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/moblin-gtk-engine-0.2.4-1.fc11.src.rpm GTK engine for Moblin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:42:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:42:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241942.n5OJg2Rs008991@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:42:01 EDT --- perl-p5-Palm-1.009-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-p5-Palm'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-6909 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:44:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:44:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505448] Review Request: perl-Pod-Xhtml - Generate well-formed XHTML documents from POD format documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241944.n5OJi69e032184@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505448 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:44:06 EDT --- perl-Pod-Xhtml-1.59-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:44:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:44:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241944.n5OJixsF032481@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 15:44:58 EDT --- perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:45:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:45:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505955] Review Request: perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp - Template based module starter for CGI apps In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241945.n5OJj3Pc000342@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505955 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.10-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:47:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:47:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241947.n5OJlOXg000880@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #8 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-06-24 15:47:22 EDT --- > $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/uClibc-0.9.30.1-1.fc11.src.rpm > uClibc.src:69: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/* > uClibc.src:70: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/ OK, these don't appear in the binary package. > $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/uClibc-devel-0.9.30.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Blockers: - License: should AFAICS be "LGPLv2" (no "+") - "No debuginfo needed" is rather useless reason for disabling debuginfo. Perhaps "This package only contains a static library". - Use %global instead of %define Other requirements: - Use %{?_smp_mflags} in (make V=1) - All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment Notes: - You can use %files ... %{_includedir}/uClibc instead of %files ... %dir %{_includedir}/uClibc %{_includedir}/uClibc/* (and the same for _libdir) - Please consider setting PREFIX instead of DEVEL_PREFIX - CFLAGS do not use %{optflags}, it probably doesn't make sense in this case - The ExcludeArch: comment will have to be filed as a bug component creation in bugzilla - My POV is that uClibc is a package that can be correctly packaged and made available to users of Fedora. I probably wouldn't approve a review of any other Fedora package linking against uClibc - both anaconda and mkinitrd link against glibc, after all. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 19:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 15:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906241948.n5OJmxvB001348@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Peter Backes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rtc at gmx.de --- Comment #19 from Peter Backes 2009-06-24 15:48:57 EDT --- Simon, how about generalizing this application into something like a general purpose download program? The present porn specific functionality could be implemented as a appropriate configuration file that contains the URL and whatever else. This configuration file could be kept and maintainted separately and it wouldn't be necessary to include it. Perhaps that way you could bypass the problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:09:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 474802] Review Request: vacation - Automatic mail answering program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242009.n5OK9vGJ016670@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474802 --- Comment #8 from Till Bubeck 2009-06-24 16:09:54 EDT --- OK, I hopefully managed to fix all problems mentioned in Comment #6. Anyway, thanks for them... Second I rebuild for FC11 which didn't mean a change. I've uploaded again an updates SPEC/SRPMs to: Spec URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation.spec SRPM URL: http://www.reinform.de/download/rpm/vacation/vacation-1.2.7.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Please review, thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:27:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:27:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242027.n5OKRtbC011325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jan.klepek at hp.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jan.klepek at hp.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYTFY023114@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Bug 506833 depends on bug 506476, which changed state. Bug 506476 Summary: Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYmvo023222@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Bug 506721 depends on bug 506712, which changed state. Bug 506712 Summary: Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506450] Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYCiM022914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-24 16:34:11 EDT --- Done. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYFvE022973@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Bug 506476 depends on bug 506450, which changed state. Bug 506450 Summary: Package Review: twitter-glib - A library wrapping the Twitter RESTful API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506450 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506486] Package Review: mojito - A social network data aggregator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYSQu023092@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506486 Bug 506486 depends on bug 506476, which changed state. Bug 506476 Summary: Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506476] Package Review: rest - A library for access to RESTful web services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYQ28023022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506476 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-24 16:34:25 EDT --- Done. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:34:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:34:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506712] Package Review: libccss - A simple api for CSS Stylesheets In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242034.n5OKYkNH023161@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506712 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-24 16:34:45 EDT --- Done. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:35:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:35:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506833] Review Request: bisho - Moblin web services settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242035.n5OKZ43n013036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506833 Bug 506833 depends on bug 506780, which changed state. Bug 506780 Summary: Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:35:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:35:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506780] Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242035.n5OKZ2cT012757@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-24 16:35:00 EDT --- Done. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:35:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:35:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507299] Review Request: network-manager-netbook - Moblin Netbook GUI for NetworkManger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242035.n5OKZ5pJ013061@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507299 Bug 507299 depends on bug 506780, which changed state. Bug 506780 Summary: Package Review: mux - GTK+ widgets for moblin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506780 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506848] Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242035.n5OKZFkW023824@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-24 16:35:14 EDT --- Done. Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:35:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:35:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242035.n5OKZHnn023878@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Bug 506855 depends on bug 506848, which changed state. Bug 506848 Summary: Review Request: bognor-regis - Media daemon and play queue manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506848 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:35:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:35:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507958] New: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jjohnstn at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/eclipse-rse.spec SRPM URL: ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/newlib/eclipse-rse-3.0.3-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Remote System Explorer (RSE) is a framework and toolkit in Eclipse Workbench that allows you to connect and work with a variety of remote systems. It is required by the latest CDT release 6.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:39:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:39:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507943] Review Request: moblin-gtk-engine - GTK engine for Moblin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242039.n5OKdVPS013883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507943 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |moblin-gtk-egine - GTK |moblin-gtk-engine - GTK |engine for Moblin |engine for Moblin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:42:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:42:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242042.n5OKgJ6A014822@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #7 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-24 16:42:18 EDT --- The package seems ok and it's basic approved. It's OK on all points. I'm not very comfortable on making the initial commit from just some tarball of a git tag. I know that it blocks a lot of reviews but there's a lot of time until the freeze. So just post here when upstream has posted a tarball and update the changelog to reflect the new version (you forgot this for 0.11). And I'll give the fedora-review + -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:43:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:43:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242043.n5OKh48c025523@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net |radford at blackbean.org Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-24 16:43:02 EDT --- 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I won't force another back-and-forth for 2. but do fix it before cvs import ??? APPROVED ??? The review is finished and you're now on you own to build, push and register your package everywhere it matters. Your next steps are documented on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 20:55:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:55:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242055.n5OKt9of018105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-24 16:55:08 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:09:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:09:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490355] Review Request: emacs-jde - Emacs module for java develop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242109.n5OL99oC021173@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490355 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James 2009-06-24 17:09:08 EDT --- With respect to comment #3, please note that Ville's comments are absolutely correct for this package as well. In the source distribution's java/lib directory are some jars with no corresponding sources: bsh.jar (which appears to include some classes from objectweb-asm), checkstyle.jar (which includes some classes from antlr, several jakarta-commons packages, and something from puppycrawl.com), and junit.jar. Also try "grep -RF com.sun java/src". In addition, the complaint that some source files are missing is absolutely valid. Note that java/src/jde.jar contains "jde/debugger/gui/ThreadDisplay.class". Where's the source file for that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507615] Review request: Vemana2000-fonts Unicode compliant OpenType font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242122.n5OLMPPL024361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507615 Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |sshedmak at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-24 17:22:24 EDT --- 1. not sure if it should be classified as sans-serif, I guess it's up for Telugu users to decide 2. Please work a bit more on the package summary (at minimum, start with "A free OpenType font" not "Its Free OpenType font") 3. Fontforge complains a lot about this TTF file. It seems it was created by copying Pothana2000, and it still declares Pothana2000 all over the place. Please ask politely upstream to clean up the font metadata (remove the restricted bit, change the Pothana2000 strings to Vemana2000, change the font style to Regular or whatever standard style is appropriate). You can even do it yourself with Fedora's fontforge and send the fixed file upstream if the author agrees (I see I had noted the non-standard style for Pothana2000 too, even though it's less broken metadata-side than Vemana200). However, none of this is strictly speaking rpm packaging, so I'll approve the package and let you deal with the TTF bugs as the font Fedora packager :p ??? APPROVED ??? This review is finished and you're now on you own to build, push and register your package everywhere it matters. Your next steps are documented on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle#3.a Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! Do it again please :) If you still need sponsoring, apply to the Packager group in FAS and post your login here, so I can sponsor you. If you have questions or need more help, don't hesitate to ask questions in ##fonts or ##fedora-devel or on the fonts sig mailing list http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_SIG_mailing_lists -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242131.n5OLV8eW003852@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-06-24 17:31:07 EDT --- Fixed all warnings of rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:53:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:53:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242153.n5OLrQM7030456@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jim Radford changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Jim Radford 2009-06-24 17:53:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > 1. For multiarch packages you'll find out it's better not to change the > timestamp of txt files during encoding conversion (that's why the other spec > had a touch). But for a noarch package, in %doc, I guess no one cares a lot I agree it doesn't matter for noarch, but I preserved them anyway. > 2. Please do include OFL-FAQ.txt as %doc too, even though OFL.txt is the main > legal document the FAQ has some legal value. And it's not big I agree. Fixed. > Thank you for packaging a new Fedora font! You're welcome. Spec URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://blackbean.org/review/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: inkboy-fonts Short Description: A clean and usable latin fantasy font Owners: radford Branches: F-11 InitialCC: font-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 21:59:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:59:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502693] Review Request: Elgg 1.5 - An open source social networking platform. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242159.n5OLxhwg032718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502693 --- Comment #5 from Justin Gallardo 2009-06-24 17:59:41 EDT --- Thanks for the notes. I have been swamped lately, but will have some time to look at this again very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242229.n5OMTVbk015381@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-06-24 18:29:30 EDT --- Duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] New: Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Summary: Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: linuxdonald at linuxdonald.de QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Hi, This is my second package and I am looking for a sponsor. I have update this package because Bruno Mahe don?t have the time to do this. I have talked with him and now i work on this package. Spec URL: http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/bullet.spec SRPM URL: http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/bullet-2.74-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Bullet 3D Game Multiphysics Library provides state of the art collision detection, soft body and rigid body dynamics. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:34:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:34:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242234.n5OMYm82016455@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 --- Comment #2 from steve 2009-06-24 18:34:47 EDT --- Updated the License tag based on Spot's comment about License version nos. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-June/msg00108.html New spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/javanotes.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/javanotes-5.1-1.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:33:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:33:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242233.n5OMXtE3016365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #2 from steve 2009-06-24 18:33:54 EDT --- Updated the License tag based on Spot's comment about License version nos. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-June/msg00108.html New spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/ldd3_pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/ldd3_pdf-3.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:37:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:37:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242237.n5OMbUrr008610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ville.skytta at iki.fi Blocks| |496968(DebugInfo) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:37:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:37:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242237.n5OMbBY3008551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2009-06-24 18:37:09 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349312) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349312) Patch build to honor CFLAGS from environment Package is not built with $RPM_OPT_FLAGS, fix attached. This patch should be applicable upstream as well, please forward it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242245.n5OMjk2L010416@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Nikolay Vladimirov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-24 18:45:45 EDT --- Ok, scratch the previous I had a rethink so: MUST: * rpmlint output: 0 errors, 0 warnings ( both srpm and binary rpm) * package name: OK * The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exeption: OK * Packaging Guidelines: OK * License: OK * The License field file matches the actual license: OK * License included in %doc: OK * The spec file must be written in American English: OK * The spec file for the package MUST be legible: OK * The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source: OK * The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture: OK ( on i586) * All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires: OK * The spec file MUST handle locales properly: N/A ( no locales) * Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun: OK * A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory: OK * A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings: OK * Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line: OK * Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK * Each package must consistently use macros: OK * The package must contain code, or permissable content: OK * Header files must be in a -devel package: OK * Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability): OK * If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package: OK * In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} : OK * Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built: OK * At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT): OK * All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 : OK SHOULD Items: * The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock: OK (for i586 rawhide) Minor things before commit: * Update the changelog before committing * Note the clutter version in build requres since it's still(0.8.8 in f11) BuildRequires: clutter-devel >= 0.9.4 * add HACKING and README to %doc -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 22:55:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:55:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242255.n5OMtE6I020613@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #9 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-24 18:55:13 EDT --- Forgot to mention: >From the packaging guidelines: Using Revision Control In some cases you may want to pull sources from upstream's revision control system because there have been many changes since the last release and you think that a tarball that you generate from there will more accurately show how the package relates to upstream's development. Here's how you can use a comment to show where the source came from: # The source for this package was pulled from upstream's vcs. Use the # following commands to generate the tarball: # svn export -r 250 http://www.example.com/svn/foo/trunk foo-20070221 # tar -czvf foo-20070221.tar.gz foo-20070221 Source0: foo-20070221.tar.gz So, Note that you're using a git tag and how can it be checkedout -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 23:27:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:27:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242327.n5ONR35u026665@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bruno at gnoll.org --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-24 19:27:01 EDT --- *** Bug 476404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jun 24 23:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 19:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476404] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906242327.n5ONR2KF026639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476404 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #34 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-24 19:27:01 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 507972 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 00:35:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:35:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507761] Review Request: rubygem-coderay - CodeRay is a fast syntax highlighter engine for many languages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250035.n5P0Zn0J007646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507761 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-24 20:35:48 EDT --- Thanks for update. Now I will wait for bug 504469 to be updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 00:40:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:40:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250040.n5P0e0mE032028@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 01:41:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 21:41:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250141.n5P1fgxV012549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 02:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507697] Review Request: python-migrate0.5 - chema migration tools for SQLAlchemy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250251.n5P2ptx6029289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507697 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-24 22:51:54 EDT --- Correct. This package is needed for EPEL4/5. It could be used on F-10 as well although I don't know if lmacken plans on branching it there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 02:53:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 22:53:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250253.n5P2rC3H004943@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |a.badger at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-06-24 22:53:11 EDT --- Correct. This package is needed for EPEL4/5. It could be used on F-10 as well although I don't know if lmacken plans on branching it there. Fedora Community needs to have sqlalchemy-0.5.x in order to run so getting it running on an EL-5 box depends on having this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 07:26:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:26:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250726.n5P7QEK2020525@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-25 03:25:22 EDT --- Removing FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 07:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250725.n5P7PAWX020217@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Jussi Lehtola changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|182235(FE-Legal) | --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-25 03:25:09 EDT --- Removing FE-LEGAL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 07:32:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:32:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250732.n5P7WLbY029843@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-25 03:32:20 EDT --- APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 07:34:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:34:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250734.n5P7YaMJ022063@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #5 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-25 03:34:35 EDT --- https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2009-June/msg01872.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 07:27:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 03:27:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250727.n5P7RwZg028880@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #4 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-25 03:27:56 EDT --- Yeah .. I had posted it fedora-devel regarding .. "what would be most suited name for this" .. may you follow up there? I don't think SevenZip is apt. May you check this .. I did not see any debuginfo file ? [rakesh at dhcp7-204 new]$ rpmlint /home/rakesh/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm SevenZip.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/gcj/SevenZip/SevenZip-4.65.jar.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 08:18:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:18:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250818.n5P8IXQp000669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Depends on| |507693 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 08:21:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:21:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3_pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250821.n5P8LPRv009667@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-25 04:21:23 EDT --- Drive-by comment: Don't use "_" in the naming. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 08:01:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:01:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250801.n5P81jM3027992@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #21 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-25 04:01:41 EDT --- http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-4.fc11.src.rpm Updated. I have fixed Comment in tvtk_doc and added GenericName to bot, fixed scriplets -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 08:27:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:27:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250827.n5P8RcW7003022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507710 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 08:57:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 04:57:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 444760] Review Request: obm - Open Business Management In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906250857.n5P8vmSk009344@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444760 --- Comment #20 from Jesse Keating 2009-06-25 04:57:44 EDT --- Xavier Lamien, can you continue with this review, or would you like somebody to take over the review request to get obm in? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 10:05:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 06:05:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507695] Review Request: python-sqlalchemy0.5 - Modular and flexible ORM library for python In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251005.n5PA5cjT032095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507695 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-25 06:05:37 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1432964 + source files match upstream url 0a4f50b690ae946c3188614eeea6f1e5f02681d9 SQLAlchemy-0.5.3.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application I don't get why all .py* files installed under /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/SQLAlchemy-0.5.3-py2.6.egg ? Why rpmlint is complaining script-without-shebang error with this package whereas I don't see such rpmlint messages in rawhide package? why following is added to SPEC ? BuildRequires: python-sqlite2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 13:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508066] New: Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508066 Summary: Review Request: python-sybase - Python interface to Sybase Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/python-sybase/python-sybase.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/python-sybase/python-sybase-0.39-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: python-sybase is a DB-API 2.0 compliant Python interface to the Sybase Relational Database. $ rpmlint mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/python-sybase-*rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 13:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] New: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML-Javascript.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML-Javascript-1.1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The PEAR::HTML_Javascript package provides methods for creating simple JS scripts * Package built as per package maintainers wishlist - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist#P * rpmlint silent on spec and rpms * Builds on Koji - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1435562 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 14:52:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:52:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251452.n5PEqtlK024550@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #1 from Ricky Zhou 2009-06-25 10:52:53 EDT --- Tiny thing, you can probably take out -c from the install command. The manpage says it's ignored (weird). * rpmlint clean * package meets naming guidelines * uses macros consistently * build root is ok * license is good * Requires/BuildRequires are OK * Permissions are fine APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 14:57:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:57:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251457.n5PEvPSX025699@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Ricky Zhou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rzhou at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Ricky Zhou 2009-06-25 10:57:23 EDT --- Forgot to do the assigning + fedora-review stuff :-/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251502.n5PF2bTj026883@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-06-25 11:02:36 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-HTTP302Found Short Description: Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects Owners: ianweller Branches: F-11 F-10 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] New: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: andrew at topdog.za.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-Auth-HTTP/php-pear-Auth-HTTP.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-Auth-HTTP/php-pear-Auth-HTTP-2.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: The PEAR::Auth_HTTP class provides methods for creating an HTTP authentication system using PHP, that is similar to Apache's realm-based .htaccess authentication. * From package maintainers wishlist - http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainers_wishlist#P * rpmlint - clean on spec and rpms * Koji build successful - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1435647 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:34:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:34:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490061] Review Request: awesfx - Utility programs for AWE32/Emu10k1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251534.n5PFYAs6003681@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490061 --- Comment #14 from Guido Grazioli 2009-06-25 11:34:08 EDT --- thx, and yep you are right Kevin, i just filed a new releng ticket -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:39:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:39:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251539.n5PFd67m011371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #28 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-25 11:39:02 EDT --- Hey Paul, Toshio helped me find the error in the package. The package flickrnet has a flickrnet.pc file and on the first line, it uses libdir=/usr/lib/ instead of libdir=@LIBDIR@ This is the reason why it won't find lib64. To fix it, on the flickrnet.spec, we do sed -i 's|@LIBDIR@|%_libdir|g' %{SOURCE1} in the %prep section, after %patch0 -p1. I'll attach the patch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:39:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:39:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251539.n5PFdwfn005130@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #29 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-25 11:39:56 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349415) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349415) Patches flickrnet's pkgconfig file to use lib64 Patches flickrnet's pkgconfig file to use lib64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:50:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:50:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251550.n5PFonFX014542@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: ldd3_pdf - |Review Request: ldd3-pdf - |Linux Device Drivers, Third |Linux Device Drivers, Third |Edition Book in PDF format |Edition Book in PDF format --- Comment #5 from steve 2009-06-25 11:50:48 EDT --- Thanks for the correction spot. Changed the name from ldd3_pdf to ldd3-pdf. New spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/ldd3-pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/ldd3-pdf-3.0-2.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251556.n5PFuIEf016015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-25 11:56:17 EDT --- mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 15:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251556.n5PFuNYM016106@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-25 11:56:22 EDT --- mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 16:13:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:13:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251613.n5PGD0MP020323@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #6 from steve 2009-06-25 12:12:59 EDT --- Sorry, i forgot to add the %{?dist} after the release bump. Corrected that. The new spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/ldd3-pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/ldd3-pdf-3.0-2.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 16:15:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:15:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467655] Review Request: yafaray - a raytracer for Blender. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251615.n5PGFiaq021004@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467655 --- Comment #56 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-25 12:15:38 EDT --- I want to nofify you, that blender-2.94a is in updates-testing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:03:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251703.n5PH39SE026466@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #15 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-25 13:03:07 EDT --- Upstream has reacted to the license question and uploaded a new version which addressed all these issues. I've changed the licence to GPLv3+ and built against the newest upstream release, beta4: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~liquidat/audex-0.71-0.1.beta4.fc10.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:27:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507260] Review Request: wordpress-mu-plugin-defaults - WordPress MU Plugin to set new blog default settings In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251727.n5PHRkmP005324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507260 --- Comment #2 from Nick Bebout 2009-06-25 13:27:46 EDT --- Koji scratch build is here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1428746 My FAS username is nb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:41:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:41:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251741.n5PHf9lI008811@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-25 13:41:08 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC file matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + Package contains a valid license tag + Package contains CA-BY-SA as a valice free license for content + Package contains a verbartin copy of the license text + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Source tarball could be downloaded via spectool -g + Package tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: 5cfce7586b3eed87d57c715d5ba86e17) + Consistent usage of rpm macros + Package doesn't contains subpackages + Package contains proper buildroot definition + Buildroot will be cleaned at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package is built as an noarch package + Package contains empty %build stanza + Local build works fine + Rpmlint is silent for source rpm + Rpmlint is silent for binary rpm + Local install and uninstall works fine + Sratch build on koji works fine + Files have proper file permission + %files stanza contains no duplicate entries + All Files are own by this package + No files are belong to an onther package + Package contains only documentation + Package has proper %changelog stanza Your package is APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:48:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:48:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 493246] Review Request: Shutter -- a feature-rich screenshot program. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251748.n5PHmtxG010574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493246 --- Comment #19 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-25 13:48:53 EDT --- Jan Klepek Now I have uploaded a new SRPM and a new SPEC. I have removed File and Proc module included in source code tarball. SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter-0.70.2-3.ppa4.fc11.src.rpm SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter/shutter.spec Also I find a new version shutter will be released. Shutter testing team is testing shutter-0.80 in LaunchPad. Shutter-0.80 add many new features. I build a package for shutter-0.80~ppa6. It also requires your perl-Proc-Simple. Here are SRPM and SPEC. SRPM:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter-testing/shutter-0.80-1.ppa6.fc11.src.rpm SPEC:http://liangsuilong.fedorapeople.org/shutter-testing/shutter.spec I hope your perl-Proc-Simple will be approved soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:50:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:50:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] New: Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Summary: Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mel at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/education-bookmarks/education-bookmarks.spec SRPM URL: http://mchua.fedorapeople.org/education-bookmarks/education-bookmarks-1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is a package of bookmarks for the Education SIG spin. It contains links to information about the spin and the open source education projects that the spin is designed to be a ready-to-go starter development environment for. This is my first package; I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:51:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251751.n5PHpbZ3011535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Mel Chua changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 17:56:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 13:56:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251756.n5PHuNDW007869@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #30 from Paul Lange 2009-06-25 13:56:21 EDT --- Hey Juan, sorry for the bug in flickrnet. I applied your patch and changed some things. Can you please check the this build works correctly http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1435936 Thank you for your work! Paul -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 18:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508126] Review Request: education-bookmarks - Education SIG spin bookmarks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251803.n5PI3Zrr009537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508126 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rdieter at math.unl.edu --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-25 14:03:34 EDT --- I can take a look soonish... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 18:28:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:28:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469931] Review Request: ipmiutil - IPMI Management Utilities In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251828.n5PISCjC015192@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469931 --- Comment #9 from Andy Cress 2009-06-25 14:28:10 EDT --- ipmiutil-2.4.0 is now released with some updates for Fedora issues. SPEC URL: http://ipmiutil.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ipmiutil/trunk/doc/ipmiutil.spec SRC RPM URL: http://ipmiutil.sourceforge.net/FILES/ipmiutil-2.4.0-1.src.rpm I moved the ipmi_port and events binaries to /usr/sbin, and changed 'events' to 'ievents'. I moved the init.d and cron scripts from the data directory to go directly into /etc/rc.d/init.d and /etc/cron.daily via the %files rather than copying them in %post. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 18:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:41:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251841.n5PIf2r9017684@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #8 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-25 14:41:01 EDT --- I wouldn't use %dist since the packages on different distributions are identical, since they only contain the PDF... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 18:48:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:48:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251848.n5PImPY0023987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #9 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-25 14:48:24 EDT --- I disaggree with you in this point. Even if alle the releases contains the same content, it may be helpful to use the %{dist} tag. For example for F-12 the usage of LZMA to compress the rpm data is planed. So on the dist tag, you can see, if you can use a package for F-12 or not without a try to install it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 19:01:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:01:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251901.n5PJ17IA026631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel 2009-06-25 15:01:06 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: libinfinity Short Description: Library inplementing the infinote protocol Owners: mathstuf Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 19:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:08:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251908.n5PJ8pN2028129@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #10 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-25 15:08:50 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I disaggree with you in this point. Even if alle the releases contains the same > content, it may be helpful to use the %{dist} tag. For example for F-12 the > usage of LZMA to compress the rpm data is planed. So on the dist tag, you can > see, if you can use a package for F-12 or not without a try to install it. Not using the %dist tag doesn't mean the F12 package won't be LZMA compressed. What matters is when one updates, say from F11 to F12 the packages that don't have the %dist tag won't be updated (until a new version is available in the updates repo) if the version and release in both distros is the same: say, foo-1-1 in F11 and foo-1-1 in F12. When the dist tag is used the F12 package foo-1-1.fc12 will be "newer" than foo-1-1.fc11 and thus will replace the old one. In case the package is (close to) identical in both distros [no binaries compiled], not using the dist tag saves some download and update time. Of course, generally speaking something is compiled in every package and the %dist tag should be used, so from a stylistic point of view using it could be advised in these cases too. However, if the package is as big as the SRPM (11 MB) I wouldn't put in a %dist tag since nothing is gained from it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 19:45:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:45:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251945.n5PJjatW000639@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-25 15:45:34 EDT --- I can review this. I still consider the qmake hackery a monkeystudio bug, and is potentially a review blocker (details to follow). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 19:50:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:50:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906251950.n5PJoupg001752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #11 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-25 15:50:55 EDT --- I have got a look on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag Because this document says, that using of the dist tag is not mandotory, your solution is permitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:10:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:10:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252010.n5PKAaSY006817@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 16:10:35 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:11:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:11:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252011.n5PKBUur006949@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 16:11:28 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:12:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:12:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252012.n5PKCHR4012098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 16:12:16 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:22:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:22:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 460974] Review Request: xmobar - status bar for X In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252022.n5PKMPdY009274@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=460974 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oglesbyzm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:21:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:21:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252021.n5PKLBe4013985@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:21:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:21:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252021.n5PKLc08014098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oglesbyzm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:23:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:23:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503250] Review Request: ghc-hinotify - Haskell binding to INotify In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252023.n5PKN4FN014405@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503250 Zach Oglesby changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |oglesbyzm at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:21:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:21:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252021.n5PKLnF9014138@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #12 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-25 16:21:48 EDT --- SHOULD: fix the monkeystudio.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang type errors from rpmlint. This seems to be due to spurious permissions of said files, ie, them being executable. SHOULD: consider using some/more qt4-related rpm macros, see /etc/rpm/macros.qt4 for details. In particular, %{_qt4_qmake} or %{_qt4_bindir} make be useful MUST: drop qmake hack (on x86_64). The hack makes the build not use the recommended compiler flags, see also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags Then, investigation can continue on finding the proper cause for missing symbols in monkeystudio plugins. Looking closer, the only differences I see are with the hack, stuff is build pretty much only with -O2 and without the hack, -m64 -pipe -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic and linked additionally with: -m64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252046.n5PKkkmE020080@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #13 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-06-25 16:46:45 EDT --- Thanx for taking the review Rex, I'll update the review this weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 20:58:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:58:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252058.n5PKwwVH022645@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 Filipe AZEVEDO changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pasnox at gmail.com --- Comment #14 from Filipe AZEVEDO 2009-06-25 16:58:57 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) > I can review this. > > I still consider the qmake hackery a monkeystudio bug, and is potentially a > review blocker (details to follow). Hi, I'm the monkeystudio author. I would spoke about the 64bits hack. As far as i know it's not a mks bug, i see no way to prove that, in fact i don't play with qmake spec. Ordinary sub project are build using parent project spec. I never see this problem in others 64bits os ( differents unix like distro like debian, ubuntu and derivated, and os x / windows ). I have no fedora install right now so i can't really check, it would be nice to have the complete build log so i can analyze it. If i got the time i could eventually later create a dummy small project that could reproduce the problem. For me the probleme is mostly into default qmake used spec, it could be interesting to know what spec is used as default and see it's content. Regards, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:10:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:10:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252110.n5PLA5ah020651@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-25 17:10:04 EDT --- inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252113.n5PLDoHM026904@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #12 from steve 2009-06-25 17:13:49 EDT --- I agree with Jussi Lehtola's reasoning that the presence of the dist tag does not serve much of a purpose whereas it's absence would reduce download and update time. I choose to go without the dist tag. The new spec and srpm are below. (note: I've reverted back the release to 1, since the dist tag was the only change and the package isn't an officially 'released' package yet): Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/ldd3-pdf.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/ldd3-pdf-3.0-1.src.rpm Jochen, sorry for the trouble, but could you please review and re-approve ? cheers, - steve -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:19:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:19:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507912] Review Request: alp - Advanced Linux Programming, Book By CodeSourcery LLC, PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252119.n5PLJj1E028278@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507912 --- Comment #1 from steve 2009-06-25 17:19:44 EDT --- Made a minor change -- removed the dist tag, since it doesn't really serve any purpose for this rpm (same as the reasoning in bz 507915). Newer spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/alp.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/alp-1.0-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:18:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:18:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252118.n5PLIdc6022453@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 --- Comment #4 from steve 2009-06-25 17:18:38 EDT --- Made a minor change -- removed the dist tag, since it doesn't really serve any purpose for this rpm (same as the reasoning in bz 507915). Newer spec and srpm are at: Spec URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SPECS/javanotes.spec SRPM URL: http://lonetwin.net/yum/SRPMS/javanotes-5.1-1.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:51:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:51:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252151.n5PLp1kp029172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 --- Comment #4 from Xavier Lamien 2009-06-25 17:51:00 EDT --- woops. Package is noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:51:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:51:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505406] Review Request: rubygem-rake-compiler - Rake-based Ruby C Extension task generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252151.n5PLpZ4M029252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505406 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 21:49:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:49:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252149.n5PLnoa1028621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Xavier Lamien changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Xavier Lamien 2009-06-25 17:49:48 EDT --- OK source files match upstream OK package meets naming and versioning guidelines. OK specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. OK dist tag is present. OK Global are used. OK build root is correct. OK license field matches the actual license. OK license is open source-compatible (LGPLv2 or Ruby). License text included in package in part of reason has been given properly. OK latest version is being packaged. OK BuildRequires are proper. OK %clean is present. OK package builds in koji (Rawhide/x86_64). OK rpmlint is silent. OK final provides and requires look sane. -- %check is present (however, test need more work, not a blocker). OK owns the directories it creates. OK doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. OK no duplicates in %files. OK file permissions are appropriate. OK correct scriptlets present. OK code, not content. OK huge %docs has been moved to sub-package OK package installed properly According to ruby guideline, the package uses proper ruby specific packaging. ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 23:06:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] New: Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Summary: Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: david at gnsa.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/pywbem.spec SRPM URL: http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/pywbem-0.7.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A Python library for making CIM operations over HTTP using the WBEM CIM-XML protocol. It is based on the idea that a good WBEM client should be easy to use and not necessarily require a large amount of programming knowledge. It is suitable for a large range of tasks from simply poking around to writing web and GUI applications. It also provides a Python provider interface, and is the fastest and easiest way to write providers on the planet. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jun 25 23:47:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 19:47:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906252347.n5PNlGeq019882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 19:47:15 EDT --- This seems to be a duplicate of bug 245688. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 01:20:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:20:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260120.n5Q1KgNg005610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #10 from John Guthrie 2009-06-25 21:20:40 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, I took a look at the package and I only see one remaining issue: The > LICENSE.fedora file isn't UTF-8; it contains 0xC6, which is probably an > ISO-8859-15 character. I guess you've just dumped some email messages to a > file, and the message with the character doesn't contain an encoding, but I > would suggest that the file is intended to be read as a file, not a mail > folder, and so should be UTF-8. Can you convert it before you import? Thank you for the approval and your assistance. I do have one question though. You were correct in that the LICENSE.fedora file is a dump of emails. I was wondering if you had nay suggestions on any explanatory text that I might want to include in that file, or if those emails can stand on their own? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 01:22:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260122.n5Q1Mcj3011119@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-25 21:22:37 EDT --- Thanks for the review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: tootaudioservers Short Description: Toot2 Audio Server Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 01:30:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:30:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260130.n5Q1U7s9012567@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #11 from John Guthrie 2009-06-25 21:30:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > OK, I took a look at the package and I only see one remaining issue: The > LICENSE.fedora file isn't UTF-8; it contains 0xC6, which is probably an > ISO-8859-15 character. I guess you've just dumped some email messages to a > file, and the message with the character doesn't contain an encoding, but I > would suggest that the file is intended to be read as a file, not a mail > folder, and so should be UTF-8. Can you convert it before you import? > APPROVED The UTF8 issue has been fixed, and the package is ready for import. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 01:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260134.n5Q1YDih007887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 21:34:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 01:34:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260134.n5Q1YKFO007932@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from John Guthrie 2009-06-25 21:34:19 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: mediawiki-Renameuser Short Description: An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts Owners: guthrie Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 01:52:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 21:52:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260152.n5Q1qc9A011536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #2 from David Nalley 2009-06-25 21:52:36 EDT --- So it is, thanks for catching that. I noticed that you inquired on 20 June 2009 regarding the status of that review. Since it is just a few days yet till the week required to mark package review FE-DEADREVIEW under the "Policy for Stalled Package Reviews" I will hold off on making any additional progress till 28 June and review that bug for progress there. If there is no progress I'll mark bug 245688 as FE-DEADREVIEW and proceed here. My preference is for someone else to maintain it (and for a new packager to be added in the process). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 02:17:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260217.n5Q2HgoQ017636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-25 22:17:40 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 02:23:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 22:23:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260223.n5Q2NvH3024045@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #22 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-25 22:23:54 EDT --- Rakesh, I'm sorry I noticed a few things that I should have noticed before. * The directory %{python_sitearch}/enthought/ is not owned! * No icons specified in the .desktop files. This is not a blocker but it would be really nice to have an icon in the desktop menu for Mayavi. Also, without icons those scriptlets we used have little meaning. I think we can use ./docs/source/mayavi/images/mayavi2-48x48.png from the source tree. Put it in %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/mayavi2.png and add Icon=mayavi2 to both .desktop files (unless you want to use a different icon for tvtk) * As for the Categories tag in the .desktop files, it would be good to add some more specific category names, so that the application ends up at a better place in the desktop menu. "Gnome" is too general for this kind of an application, also I have no idea how other DE's will handle it. I would suggest using Science,DataVisualization You may find other suitable categories at http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html Again, I'm sorry, I should have told you these things earlier. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 03:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260335.n5Q3ZF3p001351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #14 from John Guthrie 2009-06-25 23:35:14 EDT --- So I just imported the package into the devel branch, and I received the following email bounce: This is the mail system at host cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system : host bastion[10.8.34.50] said: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) Now I know that the email said to send a report to postmaster, but I'm also worried that such an email will get lost in a flood of spam. (I.e., postmaster can often be a spam magnet, especially on high profile domains.) Also, I'm guessing that this is more of an issue with the account system as opposed to the mail system anyway. So my question is to whom should I send this report to? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 03:36:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:36:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260336.n5Q3ahUs006801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260423.n5Q4N3D2015643@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 00:23:01 EDT --- Thank you! ----------------------------------------------------------- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-gettext_rails Short Description: Localization support for Ruby on Rails by Ruby-GetText-Package Owners: mtasaka Branches: F-11 InitialCC: (nobody) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:31:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:31:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260431.n5Q4V5YM017326@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #15 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 00:31:04 EDT --- There's a delay between package creation and the propagation of the aliases to the mail server. You set the fedora-cvs flag; did you need something from the CVS admins? It sure seems like the proper CVS branches were created when I set up the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:39:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:39:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260439.n5Q4dEAo013125@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 --- Comment #17 from John Guthrie 2009-06-26 00:39:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > I have unset the > flag as it seems that all of the branches seem to be working correctly in all > other respects. More precisely, I set the CVS flag back to +. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:38:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:38:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260438.n5Q4c7jx012996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #16 from John Guthrie 2009-06-26 00:38:06 EDT --- Thank you very much for the explanation. I was concerned that the above mail issue might have been CVS-related since I was thinking that the mail address would have been created at the same time as the CVS branches. I have unset the flag as it seems that all of the branches seem to be working correctly in all other respects. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 04:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:53:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260453.n5Q4rbUU021230@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #6 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-26 00:53:36 EDT --- I am okay with SevenZip ... may you check about debuginfo file ? as suggested in comment #4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:01:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260501.n5Q51CUq017687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-26 01:01:11 EDT --- My system builds the debuginfo package. You need to install redhat-rpm-config or use mock. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:07:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:07:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260507.n5Q57SDb018811@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 01:07:28 EDT --- tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:08:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:08:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260508.n5Q58YD5024108@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 01:08:34 EDT --- tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:10:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:10:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260510.n5Q5ARm3024639@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-26 01:10:26 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:18:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:18:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260518.n5Q5I3WD020628@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #23 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-26 01:18:02 EDT --- 1. python-Traits already owns %{python_sitearch}/enthought/ 2. Using png file for both desktop files. 3. Added. Updated: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-5.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:51:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:51:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260551.n5Q5pkwS026717@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-26 01:51:44 EDT --- * Package didn't build in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436607 that's because we are missing a BR: desktop-file-utils * Also please add Icon=mayavi2 and Icon=tvtk_doc to the .desktop files to associate the icons with desktop menu entries. * rpmlint now says Mayavi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/Mayavi-3.2.0/source/mayavi/.static Mayavi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/Mayavi-3.2.0/source/mayavi/.templates I don't know about the importance of these. I will leave them to your decision. These are all trivial fixes. Please do them before committing. ----------------------------------------- This package (Mayavi) is APPROVED by oget ----------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 05:53:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:53:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260553.n5Q5rIfo031900@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-26 01:53:18 EDT --- Thanks for the package review! New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: SevenZip Short Description: Java SDK for LZMA Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260625.n5Q6PiZl000948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 06:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260625.n5Q6PRS2005303@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 --- Comment #25 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-26 02:25:27 EDT --- Thanks .. fixed all http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/Mayavi.spec http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/Mayavi-3.2.0-6.fc11.src.rpm New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: Mayavi Short Description: The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer Owners: oget Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 07:01:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 03:01:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503490] Review Request: ayttm - Universal Instant Messaging Client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260701.n5Q71TjR011730@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503490 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-26 03:01:28 EDT --- 1) You should not use following %ifnarch x86_64 # x86_64 does not have brp-compress %define __spec_install_post %{_libdir}/rpm/brp-compress %endif remove this. 2) also I have fixed few more issues as per given in Changelog at http://paragn.fedorapeople.org/ayttm1.spec Use this spec and resubmit SPEC and SRPM for review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 08:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260848.n5Q8mqMb031641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 --- Comment #8 from Harald Hoyer 2009-06-26 04:48:51 EDT --- The kernel should BuildRequire the dracut-generic package and deliver a generic initramfs image, which can be chosen as an alternative image to the special host generated image, which can/should be triggered with a kernel install. I think the kernel only Requires /sbin/new-kernel-pkg, which is part of grubby. new-kernel-pkg will be modified to use dracut to build an image. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 08:50:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:50:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260850.n5Q8ol6D003757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #7 from Nicolas Mailhot 2009-06-26 04:50:46 EDT --- BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 09:19:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 05:19:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906260919.n5Q9JOtH009876@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-26 05:19:22 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: nbtk Short Description: A toolkit for moblin NetBooks Owners: pbrobinson Branches: F-11 F-10 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261007.n5QA7FJ7020927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #3 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-26 06:07:14 EDT --- - Don't call libtool manually. Remove the last three lines in %install, add instead BuildRequires: automake and sed -i "s|noinst_|bin_|g" Makefile.am automake to %setup, this will make the build process install xyconv to %{_bindir}. - Use SMP make flags. Change make to make %{?_smp_mflags} - Change %{_bindir}/* to %{_bindir}/xyconv and %{_includedir}/* to %{_includedir}/xylib/ (no sense in using wildcards in these cases) - The attributes %defattr(-,root,root) should be %defattr(-,root,root,-) SHOULD: Use a more recommended version of the BuildRoot tag http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:16:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:16:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] New: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Summary: Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash Koji Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436825 Note: This is needed to update perl-DBIx-Class in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:20:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261020.n5QAK4qo023630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261040.n5QAe9n6023092@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-26 06:40:08 EDT --- + is ok - is Need work Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436825 - rpmlint is NOT silent for RPM. perl-Hash-Merge.noarch: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Hash/Merge.pm 0555 perl-Hash-Merge.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Hash/Merge.pm ==> This need to be fixed. + source files match upstream url 23c6a4c3b1f620e47c34c9c9afb962e71195f955 Hash-Merge-0.11.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=45, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 usr 0.01 sys + 0.04 cusr 0.00 csys = 0.08 CPU) + Package perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(Hash::Merge) = 0.11 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(base) perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application Suggestions: 1) This package should own /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.10.0/Hash please correct this before cvs import. 2) you missed to add to spec chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* 3) fix rpmlint output. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:46:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:46:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261046.n5QAk1j0028676@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Ralf Corsepius changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203 at freenet.de Flag|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-06-26 06:45:59 EDT --- Package must own %{perl_vendordir}/Hash Revoking APPROVAL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:47:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:47:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508254] New: Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 Summary: Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tcallawa at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-namespace-clean.spec SRPM URL: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-namespace-clean-0.11-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: When you define a function, or import one, into a Perl package, it will naturally also be available as a method. This does not per se cause problems, but it can complicate subclassing and, for example, plugin classes that are included via multiple inheritance by loading them as base classes. The "namespace::clean" pragma will remove all previously declared or imported symbols at the end of the current package's compile cycle. Functions called in the package itself will still be bound by their name, but they won't show up as methods on your class or instances. Koji Rawhide Scratch Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1436845 Note: This is needed to update perl-DBIx-Class in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 10:54:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 06:54:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261054.n5QAs0h9030182@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #3 from Tom "spot" Callaway 2009-06-26 06:53:59 EDT --- Yeah, he pointed that out. Fixed along with the other issues in -2: New SRPM: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge-0.11-2.fc12.src.rpm New SPEC: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/new/perl-Hash-Merge.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 11:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508254] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261100.n5QB0MfX027805@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 11:05:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261105.n5QB5R5a000782@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-26 07:05:26 EDT --- Ralf, I thought I have already pointed that and I see there is no need to block this review just for that change. Anyway as you are now reviewer for this package, feel free to check -2 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 11:15:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:15:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508254] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261115.n5QBFAFN002958@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-26 07:15:09 EDT --- This package is already in Fedora. See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6752 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 11:18:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:18:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461390] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keep your namespace tidy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261118.n5QBIVSb031571@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461390 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-26 07:18:28 EDT --- *** Bug 508254 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 11:18:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:18:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508254] Review Request: perl-namespace-clean - Keeps imports and functions out of your namespace In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261118.n5QBIUV1031541@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508254 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE AssignedTo|panemade at gmail.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org Flag|fedora-review? | --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-26 07:18:28 EDT --- hmm. I forgot that it was me who reviewed this package. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 461390 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 11:50:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 07:50:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261150.n5QBo1On007187@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #9 from Ivana Varekova 2009-06-26 07:49:58 EDT --- Thanks fixed: Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/new/uClibc.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/varekova/new/uClibc-0.9.30.1-1.fc12.src.rpm add notes - Please consider setting PREFIX instead of DEVEL_PREFIX for now I leave DEVEL_PREFIX, but if you want it then I will do the change - CFLAGS do not use %{optflags}, it probably doesn't make sense in this case I don't think tit has a sense - The ExcludeArch: comment will have to be filed as a bug component creation in bugzilla I plan to create the bz, thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 12:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261258.n5QCwRAo027470@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 08:58:26 EDT --- 1.) Licensing README states "License: Perl Artistic License" (which sounds bad as it's not clear if GPL is permitted as well)m while XML::Parser::LiteCopy manual reads "This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." (which is good). Please ask upstream for clarification. 2.) Please remove Require: perl(Test::More) dependency, the runtime does not depend on the testing framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:07:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261307.n5QD7txc026497@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:07:54 EDT --- * rpmlint is quiet -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:07:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:07:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261307.n5QD7aS2026410@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:07:34 EDT --- * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok Needs work: - sane provides/requires - license ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:03:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261303.n5QD3x5R025325@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:03:58 EDT --- 1.) Licensing README states "License: Perl Artistic License" (which sounds bad as it's not clear if GPL is permitted as well)m while XML::Parser::LiteCopy manual reads "This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself." (which is good). Please ask upstream for clarification. 2.) Please remove useless requires. RPM generates the list for you and the runtime does not depend on the testing framework: Requires: perl(HTTP::Request) Requires: perl(HTTP::Response) Requires: perl(LWP::UserAgent) Requires: perl(Test::More) (Explicitly versioned ones are ok) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261308.n5QD87Dh030371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:08:06 EDT --- * rpmlint is quiet * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok Needs work: - sane provides/requires - license ok -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:19:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:19:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261319.n5QDJJbH000849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:19:18 EDT --- * rpmlint is quiet * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok * sane provides/requires * license ok APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:20:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:20:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507804] Review Request: perl-Flickr-API - Flickr API interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261320.n5QDKLCA029752@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507804 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:20:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:20:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507805] Review Request: perl-Flickr-Upload - Flickr upload tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261320.n5QDKIql029694@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507805 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |507804, 507801 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:20:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:20:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507801] Review Request: perl-XML-Parser-Lite-Tree - Lightweight XML tree builder In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261320.n5QDKJRf029726@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507801 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |507805 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:21:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:21:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261321.n5QDL7QV001546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 09:21:05 EDT --- ping again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:26:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:26:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261326.n5QDQmcY002997@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #47 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:26:41 EDT --- 'nushio' has been sponsored removing NEEDSPONSOR now, the package can be APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:33:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:33:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261333.n5QDXd04000700@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #31 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-26 09:33:36 EDT --- No problem with that RPM, but like I said, Toshio's the one that provided the fix, I simply pointed out the error. This fix should let me compile gnome-do-plugins for x86_64, unless there's another similar bug on another of the packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:34:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261334.n5QDYLei000804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:34:20 EDT --- 1.) Please remove Require: perl(Test::More) dependency, the runtime does not depend on the testing framework. 2.) Licensing Proc/Simple.pm contains this: # This program is free software, you can redistribute it and/or # modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. Neither README nor POD documentation contains it -- please ask upstream to include the licensing conditions there. * rpmlint is quiet * name is well according to the guidelines * source matches upstream * clean and legible SPEC file, American English * runs testsuite * builds file in mock * filelists, documentation ok Needs work: - sane provides/requires - license -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:39:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:39:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261339.n5QDdrQm002168@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #48 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-26 09:39:51 EDT --- Thanks Christian, Rajeesh and Lubomir for helping me get approved! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:42:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:42:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261342.n5QDg9lH003094@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #32 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-26 09:42:07 EDT --- Paul, could you do a build-override with that package, so I can try to build gnome-do-plugins on x86_64 on koji? Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:54:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:54:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261354.n5QDsm8O006252@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #49 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-26 09:54:46 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: blueman Short Description: GTK+ Bluetooth Manager Owners: nushio Branches: devel, F-10, F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 13:56:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 09:56:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261356.n5QDudOo006948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lkundrak at v3.sk) | --- Comment #10 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 09:56:37 EDT --- Sorry, Mamoru; I've been quite busy with rest of $daywork these day (which is quite a bad excuse for not responding). I've integrated your suggestions: SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-term-ansicolor.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-term-ansicolor-1.0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:07:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261407.n5QE7PMW013799@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Juan Manuel Rodriguez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:08:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:08:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261408.n5QE85DJ014177@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #3 from Liang Suilong 2009-06-26 10:08:04 EDT --- Jan Klepek 1) In my opinion, you maybe need to correct %file section. Because %{perl_vendorlib}/Proc would be owned by another packages like perl-Proc-*. I think these are better. %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorlib}/Proc/* %{_mandir}/man3/* 2) That BuildArch is noarch seems not to be suitable for it. As I see, building package for various architectures may be better than noarch. So I advise that BuildArch should be removed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:22:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:22:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261422.n5QEMGSL017546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 --- Comment #26 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 10:22:13 EDT --- So, Jeroen, if you want to be the maintainer of this package, I will be happy with it. Please set cvs flag again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:31:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:31:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261431.n5QEVHwE015357@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 10:31:16 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Jan Klepek > > 1) In my opinion, you maybe need to correct %file section. Because > %{perl_vendorlib}/Proc would be owned by another packages like perl-Proc-*. > > I think these are better. > > %files > %defattr(-,root,root,-) > %doc Changes README > %{perl_vendorlib}/Proc/* > %{_mandir}/man3/* This is not right -- that would leave an unowned %{perl_vendorlib}/Proc upon removal of the package, which violates the guidelines. Sharing directories is completely fine. Jan, please don't change that. > 2) That BuildArch is noarch seems not to be suitable for it. As I see, building > package for various architectures may be better than noarch. So I advise that > BuildArch should be removed. Wrong. There's nothing arch-specific in the package; it's definitely noarch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:36:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:36:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] New: Review Request: emacs-jabber Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: emacs-jabber https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Summary: Review Request: emacs-jabber Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rpandit at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- SPEC: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/spec/emacs-jabber.spec SRPM: http://rakesh.fedorapeople.org/srpm/emacs-jabber-0.7.93-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Emacs plugin for jabber protocol. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:38:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508316] Review Request: emacs-jabber - Jabber plugin for emacs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261438.n5QEcAp0016991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508316 Rakesh Pandit changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |emacs-jabber |emacs-jabber - Jabber | |plugin for emacs -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] New: Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Summary: Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-2.27.0-0.1.20090626gita13dec3.fc11.src.rpm A window manager based on metacity and clutter -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:46:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:46:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261446.n5QEkXbO022762@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-26 10:46:32 EDT --- OK. That makes the transition a little messy, but doesn't actually affect the current packaging. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:47:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:47:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484547] Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261447.n5QElmNH022908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:47:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:47:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484548] Review Request: facebook-notify - Facebook status notifier for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261447.n5QElnRD022929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484548 Bug 484548 depends on bug 484547, which changed state. Bug 484547 Summary: Review Request: pyfacebook - Python wrapper for Facebook's API https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484547 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:48:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:48:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261448.n5QEmq5T019461@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 10:48:51 EDT --- ----------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-term-ansicolor) is APPROVED by mtasaka ----------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:53:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:53:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261453.n5QErn6R020601@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #1 from Bill Nottingham 2009-06-26 10:53:48 EDT --- Just as a drive-by, that URL in the spec isn't right. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 14:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:55:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261455.n5QEtb6t024802@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 15:28:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:28:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261528.n5QFS4Aa028476@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-26 11:28:03 EDT --- Much thanks! I'm currently in the process of fixing the duplicate file listing in other rubygem packages as well. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-term-ansicolor Short Description: Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences Owners: hpejakle lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 15:32:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:32:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261532.n5QFWpw0000919@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |otaylor at redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-26 11:32:50 EDT --- Owen, what do you reckon with that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 15:33:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:33:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 470293] Review Request: sblim-cmpi-network - SBLIM Network Instrumentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261533.n5QFXjHV001044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470293 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com Bug 470293 depends on bug 501812, which changed state. Bug 501812 Summary: sblim-cmpi-base file permissions incorrect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501812 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #4 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-06-26 11:33:43 EDT --- I couldn't download the source rpm. Could you please check the link or provide with the above mentioned changes? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 15:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261536.n5QFaPWP001792@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-26 11:36:24 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > Just as a drive-by, that URL in the spec isn't right. How right you are. I've set it to moblin.org at the moment as I can't find a page on gnome.org or in google. Other suggestions welcome. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 15:49:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 11:49:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261549.n5QFnFFm000621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #33 from Paul Lange 2009-06-26 11:49:13 EDT --- Juan, package is built and update submitted: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flickrnet-2.1.5-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 16:07:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:07:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261607.n5QG7pc5009872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 --- Comment #1 from Christian Krause 2009-06-26 12:07:50 EDT --- Hi, I've reviewed the package and it looks quite good. There are only minor TODOs: - clarification about the license (I've sent a mail to fedora-legal.) - description formatting - functional test - if possible it would be great if the package would compile in F10, too... Here is the detailed review: * rpmlint: OK rpmlint SPECS/xscope.spec RPMS/i586/xscope-* SRPMS/xscope-1.1-1.gitfccbbd6.fc11.src.rpm 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * naming: OK - name matches upstream - spec file name matches package name - snapshot release tag OK according: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages * License: TODO - Although the meaning of the license seems to match the BSD license, I'm not 100% sure its a real BSD license since the wording is different. Just to confirm I've asked on the fedora-legal list for confirmation. - COPYING file packaged * specfile in American English and legible: OK * %description: TODO (minor) - I would reformat the last sentence in the %description section to use up the available space of 80 charaters. * Sources: OK - Source0 URL ok - spectool -g xscope.spec works - sources matches upstream - md5sum: c37ec177b56d5909584c1672b6beabd5 xscope-1.1.tar.bz2 * Patch0: OK - patch file can be regenerated by the supplied git diff command - upstream status of the patch is obvious fce6e9df7881061013f4acd43742585b xscope-1.1-diff_to_git.patch * Compilation: OK - mock build works - package builds correctly in koji for F12 and F11, but failed for F10 - RPMOPTFLAGS used - parallel build supported via _smp_mflags * debuginfo sub-package: OK - non-empty - debuginfo file works together with gdb * BuildRequires: OK * Locales handling: OK (n/a) * shared/static libs, pkgconfig/header/*.la files: OK (n/a) * packages must own all directories: OK * files not listed twice: OK * permissions of files: OK - %defattr used - final file permissions OK * %clean section: OK * macro usage: OK * code vs. content: OK (only code) * large documentation into subpackage: OK (n/a) * GUI application needs %{name}.desktop: OK (n/a) * no directories owned which are already owned by other packages: OK * rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %{install}: OK * all filenames UTF8: OK * functional test: TODO - running it on the same machine as the X server did not work well: - started "xscope -v1" - started "DISPLAY=:1 gedit" in another console - xscope displays some X11 protocol communication - but gedit doesn't start up completly, X server + xscope + gedit hangs, it is necessary to kill xscope by logging in via ssh... - probably it is just wrong usage - any hints welcome ;-) Best regards, Christian -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 16:53:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:53:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261653.n5QGrpLl020957@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #4 from Owen Taylor 2009-06-26 12:53:50 EDT --- For the URL, I'd suggest just using the cgit URL for now: http://git.gnome.org/cgit/mutter (I don't think the moblin URL is appropriate.) Some more drive-by comments: BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-devel [...] --without-introspection Those two conflict. We'll definitely need an introspection-enabled package of Mutter for F12, so we can package gnome-shell. That will mean making sure that the Clutter package is introspection enabled as well, and that we have up-to-date versions of gobject-introspection and gir-repository packaged. BuildRequires: fontconfig-devel BuildRequires: libglade2-devel BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel These seem extraneous. BuildRequires: zenity This should be a Requires: along with a BuildRequires. --disable-xinerama Why? At a high level, getting to packaging the gnome-shell stack for Fedora: gobject-introspection [already old version packaged, I think] gir-repository [there's a review request] clutter-0.9 gjs mutter gnome-shell Is something that I want the gnome-shell team to get to soon (though probably not until after GUADEC); and to do that, we'll definitely push out tarball releases rather than packaging git snapshots. We're happy to have co-maintainers and people helping out with that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 16:56:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:56:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261656.n5QGupiD021821@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Rudolf Kastl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |che666 at gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Rudolf Kastl 2009-06-26 12:56:50 EDT --- src rpm is broken (check size). probably half upload. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] New: Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 Summary: Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: than at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://than.fedorapeople.org/rawhide/kdepim-runtime.spec SRPM URL http://than.fedorapeople.org/rawhide/http://than.fedorapeople.org/rawhide/kdepim-runtime-4.2.95-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: KDE PIM Runtime Environment -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484485] Review Request: perl-Fedora-App-ReviewTool - Application classes for reviewtool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261707.n5QH7iva024206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484485 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |NotReady --- Comment #27 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-26 13:07:42 EDT --- No problem, I've hardly been handling this at the speed I'd like either. Work/Life are going to continue to essentially dominate my time for the next couple weeks, so I'm going to mark this on the whiteboard as "NotReady" and come back to it in a little bit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:08:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:08:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261708.n5QH8NX2018513@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #8 from Jim Radford 2009-06-26 13:08:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #7) > BTW, upstream would probably be happy to learn of the Fedora packaging Thanks for the reminder. I was waiting for the package it be added to F11 or at least to hit the rawhide mirrors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:12:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:12:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261712.n5QHC48P025398@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #6 from Owen Taylor 2009-06-26 13:12:03 EDT --- One more comment - the Summary should be : Window and compositing manager based on Clutter (That's what I used in mutter.doap and GNOME bugzilla) I don't have a %description handy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:16:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:16:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492996] Review Request: mediawiki-Renameuser - An extension that provides a special page for renaming user accounts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261716.n5QHGTha020428@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492996 John Guthrie changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #18 from John Guthrie 2009-06-26 13:16:27 EDT --- The build has completed in all requested releases. Closing this review request out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:15:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:15:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] New: Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Summary: Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cedric.olivier at free.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm.spec SRPM URL: http://cedric.olivier.free.fr/rpms/josm-1607-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Hi, I just finished packaging josm, and I would appreciate a review. It's my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. JOSM is an editor for OpenStreetMap (OSM) written in Java 1.5. Currently it supports loading stand alone GPX track data from the OSM database, loading and editing existing nodes, ways, metadata tags and relations. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:22:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:22:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261722.n5QHM3wX021563@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 Ed Swierk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:21:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:21:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] New: Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 Summary: Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eswierk at aristanetworks.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~eswierk/misc/pxe-kexec/pxe-kexec.spec SRPM URL: http://www-cs-students.stanford.edu/~eswierk/misc/pxe-kexec/pxe-kexec-0.1.7-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: pxe-kexec reads a PXELINUX configuration file, prompts the user for an entry like the PXELINUX program would do and finally boots that entry using Kexec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:40:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:40:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261740.n5QHe1TI032267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 13:40:01 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:40:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:40:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261740.n5QHe7uI032406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 13:40:06 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 17:43:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:43:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508352] Review Request: pxe-kexec - kexec boot from a PXE server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261743.n5QHhI63026498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508352 Ed Swierk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |pxe-kexec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 18:02:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:02:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261802.n5QI2Sx5004980@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 18:05:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:05:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261805.n5QI5mUD005769@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #4 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-06-26 14:05:47 EDT --- I made all the changes you suggested above, with one exception: I kept gcc-g++ in BuildRequires, I hope it's not a problem. Thank you both. Spec URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib.spec SRPM URL: http://www.unipress.waw.pl/~wojdyr/spec/xylib-0.4-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 18:19:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:19:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261819.n5QIJBZD001577@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-26 14:19:10 EDT --- As you're a new packager you should learn to run rpmlint on your packages: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Use_rpmlint You've written %defattr in the changelog, which may be expanded. rpmlint complains from this among other things. In the changelog you should use %% to prevent the macro from being expanded. rpmlint does sometimes generate noise, for instance it will comlain about the -devel package having no documentation. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 18:27:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:27:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261827.n5QIR90P003569@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #9 from Pascal 2009-06-26 14:27:07 EDT --- Upstream answer: "The conditions of use are at the beginning of the main documentation file. You can make that change, if you like. Put a note in the code that you have made this change as I want to look a little more closely as to what should be done in my version before I make any change." Effectively, in nm11.htm: 1.1 Conditions of use I place no restrictions on the use of newmat except that I take no liability for any problems that may arise from its use, distribution or other dealings with it. You can use it in your commercial projects (as well as your non-commercial projects). You can make and distribute modified or merged versions. You can include parts of it in your own software. If you distribute modified or merged versions, please make it clear which parts are mine and which parts are modified. [...] Is it not enough ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 18:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507660] Review Request: xylib - Library for reading x-y data from several file formats In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261841.n5QIfnI1007022@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507660 --- Comment #6 from Marcin Wojdyr 2009-06-26 14:41:48 EDT --- Yes, I know about rpmlint, but the last time I checked only RPMs, not the spec. Updated spec and SRPM are in the same place. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 19:18:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:18:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] New: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Summary: Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-Format-SQLite OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cweyl at alumni.drew.edu QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~cweyl/review/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.10-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module understands the formats used by SQLite for its 'date', 'datetime' and 'time' functions. It can be used to parse these formats in order to create the DateTime manpage objects, and it can take a DateTime object and produce a timestring accepted by SQLite.*NOTE:* SQLite does not have real date/time types but stores everything as strings. This module deals with the date/time strings as understood/returned by SQLite's 'date', 'time', 'datetime', 'julianday' and 'strftime' SQL functions. You will usually want to store your dates in one of these formats. Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437534 Additional Comment: This is an additional optional testing dep for the latest GA DBIx::Class. *rt-0.10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 19:25:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:25:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261925.n5QJPAYT017096@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #34 from David Nielsen 2009-06-26 15:25:08 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349593) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349593) SourceFucker Please note that that type of issue is exactly why SourceFucker was developed. It can create patches for these type of issues for your Mono packages. I would recommend running it against any current packages. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 19:36:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:36:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261936.n5QJafNI019996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 15:36:40 EDT --- (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 19:37:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:37:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261937.n5QJbKIZ024314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 15:37:19 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have should be read as "Fedora 10/11". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 19:36:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:36:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261936.n5QJaH2M024183@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 15:36:16 EDT --- Well, * This package itself can be approved (actually most issues are already discussed in the previous review request) * As mentioned in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored We request those who want to get sponsored to either submit another review request or do pre-review of other person's review request to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines". Now you have another review request bug 507110 and from a very quick glance at the spec file it is well-packaged ! Note: For openal-soft review request, please change the release number every time you modify your spec file/srpm to avoid confusion (even during review request). -------------------------------------------------------------------- This package (bullet) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------------- Please follow the procedure written on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/Join from "Install the Client Tools (Koji)". Now I am sponsoring you. If you want to import this package into Fedora 9/10, you also have to look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UpdatesSystem/Bodhi-info-DRAFT (after once you rebuilt this package on koji Fedora rebuilding system). If you have questions, please ask me. Removing NEEDSPONSOR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 19:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 15:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507675] Review Request: poppler-data - Encoding files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906261955.n5QJtdvI028229@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507675 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |poppler-data -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 20:04:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 16:04:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 479978] Review Request: newmat - C++ matrix library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262004.n5QK4tRn029800@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479978 --- Comment #10 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-26 16:04:54 EDT --- I am not a legal expert, but as stated here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses , "all software in Fedora MUST be under licenses in the Fedora licensing list. This list is based on the licenses approved by the Free Software Foundation , OSI and consultation with Red Hat Legal". Debian packagers raised the same type of concerns about licensing of that package: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=335185 , but they became eventually fine with the re-worded version of the license. It is a custom license, and the author does not appear to be ready to switch to a standard, OSI-approved, license. So, Fedora legal people may not accept that license. I prefer to let them have a look at it and decide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 21:18:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:18:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262118.n5QLIjOp012917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-06-26 17:18:44 EDT --- Fixed spec file because i had forget to add informations about my changes in the spec file http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft.spec http://www.linuxdonald.de/linuxdonald/openal-soft-1.8.466-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 22:27:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:27:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262227.n5QMRsbm024502@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Thomas Kowaliczek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 22:32:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:32:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262232.n5QMWgpR027944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-06-26 18:32:41 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: bullet Short Description: 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library Owners: linuxdonald Branches: devel, F-10, F11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 22:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262248.n5QMmes4030659@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508417 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 22:48:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:48:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] New: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Depends on: 508416 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-ruby-oepngl/rubygem-ruby-opengl.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-ruby-oepngl/rubygem-ruby-opengl-0.60.1-2.fc.src.rpm Description: ruby-opengl consists of Ruby extension modules that are bindings for the OpenGL, GLU, and GLUT libraries. It is intended to be a replacement for -- and uses the code from -- Yoshi's ruby-opengl. Koji sratch build: - Not available yet because this depends on bug 508416 - However mock build results for dist-f12 i586/x86_64 are available on: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-ruby-oepngl/Results/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 22:46:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:46:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] New: Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf.spec SRPM URL: http://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/rubygem-mkrf/rubygem-mkrf-0.2.3-1.fc.src.rpm Description: mkrf is a library for generating Rakefiles to build Ruby extension modules written in C. It is intended as a replacement for mkmf. The major difference between the two is that mkrf builds you a Rakefile instead of a Makefile. koji scratch build: For F-12: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437438 For F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437830 There are many rpmlint warining/errors on -doc subpackage, however these are on examples and I think they are safe to ignore. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 22:50:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 18:50:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262250.n5QMohQh028599@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-26 18:50:43 EDT --- By the way the naming seems a bit strange, however gem name is actually called as "ruby-opengl" so I think "rubygem-ruby-opengl" is proper for srpm name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jun 26 23:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906262331.n5QNVkti003634@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-06-26 19:31:45 EDT --- FYI, I already pushed clutter 0.9 packages for F12. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:24:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:24:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270024.n5R0OQsg012998@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #5 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-26 20:24:25 EDT --- Fabian, where do we stand on this? Per the above ticket it looks like they spun up a tarball. Do you have a version of this that will work on F11 or F12? Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:28:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:28:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270028.n5R0S2G3015920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #10 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-26 20:28:00 EDT --- Fabian, Where do we stand on this one? Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:25:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:25:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481516] Review Request: sugar-stopwatch - Simple stopwatch for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270025.n5R0PVr7015533@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481516 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |smparrish at gmail.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-26 20:25:29 EDT --- Package currently in Fedora closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:26:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:26:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472071] Review Request: sugar-paint : Paint (Draw) Activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270026.n5R0Qxw6015798@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472071 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |smparrish at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #6 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-06-26 20:26:58 EDT --- Bryan where do we stand on this. Do you have a working version for F11? Do you need help or someone to take over? Steven -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270034.n5R0YDfo016927@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #16 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-26 20:34:11 EDT --- Upstream bug, about dialog says beta3 and the sources still have the name for beta3. So the package needs to be beta3. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270034.n5R0YVjg017015@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:34:30 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:34:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:34:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270034.n5R0YD5f016960@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:34:12 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270038.n5R0cp9P017853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #26 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:38:49 EDT --- CVS done, except that I think you intended to make yourself the owner, not Orcan, so that's what I set up. Otherwise, Orcan approved his own package, which is not appropriate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:40:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270040.n5R0eAZI015964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #50 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:40:07 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:39:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:39:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270039.n5R0dZC6015565@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:39:34 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:42:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:42:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270042.n5R0g6bF016330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #51 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:42:03 EDT --- Oops, unfortunately I can't do CVS because of: blueman: PackageDB returned an error creating blueman: Email address nushio at gmail.com is not a valid bugzilla email address. Either make a bugzilla account with that email address or change your email address in the Fedora Account System https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ to a valid bugzilla email address and try again. Could you fix that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:44:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270044.n5R0iNg5016734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:44:22 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 00:43:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 20:43:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270043.n5R0hMag016600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 20:43:20 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 01:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270109.n5R19Ngd020981@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #52 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-26 21:09:21 EDT --- The problem, it seems, is that you made a FAS account, then made a bugzilla account with the FAS email. For whatever reason, pkgdb doesn't permit that; it requires that the email address in FAS and the bugzilla address match. You can request an exception by filing an infrastructure ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:01:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270201.n5R21N0a029589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-26 22:01:22 EDT --- Some quick comments: 0. drop the epoch, this is a new pkg 1. missing desktop-file-install/desktop-file-validate 2. missing icon/mime scriptlets 3. do we really want/need Provides: kdepim4 = %{version}-%{release} here? 4. Source URL is wrong (s/stable/unstable), but that's minor -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:13:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:13:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270213.n5R2DFsf001593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:13:14 EDT --- SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270214.n5R2E6Wk031985@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:14:06 EDT --- SevenZip-4.65-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/SevenZip-4.65-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:40:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270240.n5R2emfe005889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:40:47 EDT --- python-application-1.1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:42:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:42:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270242.n5R2gsEh008857@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:42:53 EDT --- erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:43:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:43:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270243.n5R2hOWP009012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:43:23 EDT --- pycolumnize-0.3.2-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:42:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:42:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270242.n5R2gxrw008901@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.1-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:40:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:40:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270240.n5R2eqQ4008049@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1.1-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:43:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:43:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507534] Review Request: pycolumnize - Python module to align in columns a simple list In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270243.n5R2hS9N006786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507534 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.3.2-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:49:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:49:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270249.n5R2nnlN011602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.1-1.fc11 |0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270246.n5R2k0JS010440@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:49:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:49:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502992] Review Request: erlang-erlsyslog - Syslog client facility for Erlang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270249.n5R2njmO009351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502992 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:49:44 EDT --- erlang-erlsyslog-0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:49:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:49:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270249.n5R2nCV7009196@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:49:11 EDT --- python-application-1.1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:49:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:49:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503174] Review Request: python-application - Basic building blocks for python applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270249.n5R2nGvh009229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503174 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1.1-2.fc11 |1.1.1-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:50:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:50:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270250.n5R2oFSv009835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090618-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507150] Review Request: gfs-pyrsos-fonts - GFS Pyrsos italic Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270250.n5R2oA0w012191@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507150 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:50:09 EDT --- gfs-pyrsos-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:53:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:53:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270253.n5R2rJG2013221@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:53:17 EDT --- libmemcached-0.30-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:56:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:56:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270256.n5R2uOZv012172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:56:23 EDT --- ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:53:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:53:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270253.n5R2rOoS011080@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.30-1.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:56:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:56:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270256.n5R2uTG1012213@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.3.0-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:59:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270259.n5R2xFYl015734@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:59:14 EDT --- libmemcached-0.30-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:59:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:59:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497682] Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270259.n5R2xJ1H015772@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.30-1.fc10 |0.30-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:59:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:59:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270259.n5R2x81W015695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.10000-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:59:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:59:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270259.n5R2xji5013315@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:59:45 EDT --- bouncycastle-tsp-1.43-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:01:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270301.n5R31PDv014206@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 23:01:24 EDT --- ophcrack-3.3.0-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499856] Review Request: perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder - WWW::Mechanize::TreeBuilder Perl module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270259.n5R2x3tC013161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499856 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:59:03 EDT --- perl-WWW-Mechanize-TreeBuilder-1.10000-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502979] Review Request: ophcrack - Ophcrack is a free Windows password cracker based on rainbow tables In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270301.n5R31UEi014238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502979 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3.3.0-3.fc11 |3.3.0-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:59:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:59:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506366] Review Request: bouncycastle-tsp - TSP libraries for Bouncy Castle In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270259.n5R2xoLZ013351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506366 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.43-2.fc11 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 02:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270258.n5R2wBTJ012940@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 22:58:10 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7023 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:00:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:00:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270300.n5R30r6k014038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 23:00:53 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7045 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:00:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:00:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270300.n5R30DsZ016514@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-26 23:00:12 EDT --- gfs-decker-fonts-20090618-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:00:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507151] Review Request: gfs-decker-fonts - GFS Decker Greek fonts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270300.n5R30ISJ016669@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507151 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20090618-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 03:27:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270327.n5R3RMQH021813@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #53 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-26 23:27:20 EDT --- Yes Jason, I know, Toshio told me about it :) I'm fixing, I've been AFK because of the fudcon. I'm excited to be a packager, you couldn't choose a better time, now that i'm pumped with Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 04:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504710] Review Request: rubygem-gettext_rails - Localization support for Ruby on Rails(>=2.3) by Ruby-GetText-Package In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270415.n5R4FPvn030188@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504710 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-27 00:15:24 EDT --- Rebuilt on all archs, submitted push request on bodhi, closing. Thank you for the review and CVS procedure. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 04:32:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:32:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480279] Review Request: gnome-globalmenu - centralized menu bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270432.n5R4W79e000438@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480279 --- Comment #37 from Feng Yu 2009-06-27 00:32:04 EDT --- Thanks. The patch is applied and the files at http://rainwoodman.dreamhosters.com/fedora-review/ are updated to 0.7.6-1. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 04:43:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:43:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270443.n5R4hdXr031554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 04:51:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:51:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270451.n5R4pa3J000606@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tpot at hp.com --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 00:51:30 EDT --- *** Bug 245688 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 04:51:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:51:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245688] Review Request: python-pywbem - Python WBEM client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270451.n5R4pY4k000580@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245688 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE Flag|fedora-review+ | --- Comment #32 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 00:51:30 EDT --- Well, someone else has submitted a pywbem package and is willing to work on it, while this ticket is still sitting here. I'm going to close this and work on the new one. If you work out the legal issues (as apparently at least one other HP employee has been able to do) and still wish to be involved with pywbem maintenance then feel free to try to get sponsorship and apply to co-maintain the other package once it's in the distribution. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508188 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 05:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 01:46:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481355] Review Request: nurbs++ - A C++ library to manipulate and create NURBS curves and surfaces. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270546.n5R5kAkC013446@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481355 --- Comment #7 from D Haley 2009-06-27 01:46:09 EDT --- I emailed upstream several days ago, two of the listed addresses are no longer valid, and no response from the other maintainer so far. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270629.n5R6TbL7020204@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:29:37 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-configuration.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-configuration-0.0.5-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270629.n5R6TdOZ020227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:29:38 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-cucumber.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-cucumber-0.3.10-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UEJq017507@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:13 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-newgem.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-newgem-1.4.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UIHn017576@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:17 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-sinatra.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-sinatra-0.9.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UFHa017530@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:14 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rack-test.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-test-0.3.0-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UJfc017597@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:18 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-treetop.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-treetop-1.2.5-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UD9o017406@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:12 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-launchy.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-launchy-0.3.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:29:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:29:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270629.n5R6TaEI017012@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:29:35 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-builder.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-builder-2.1.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504478] Review Request: rubygem-diff-lcs - Provide a list of changes between two sequenced collections In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UDcl017380@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504478 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:11 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-diff-lcs.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-diff-lcs-1.1.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UGlb017552@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:15 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rubigen.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rubigen-1.5.2-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:30:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:30:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270630.n5R6UH3v020615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 --- Comment #2 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 02:30:16 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-shotgun.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-shotgun-0.3-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:33:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270633.n5R6XiYM017975@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 02:33:43 EDT --- I've given up on the other ticket and have closed it. I'll go ahead and take care of this one. Hopefully in the future the legal issue preventing an HP employee from signing the CLA will be resolved and the submitter of that ticket (who is one of the upstream developers) can co-maintain. As in the other review, I would urge some elaboration of the acronym stew that is the description. You could drop BuildRequires: python, although it doesn't hurt anything to have it. Are you sure it's wise to rename the executables? Of course, the other review renamed the executables to mofcomp and pywbemcli, so perhaps there's simply no standard for the names of these executables. Maybe it's worth checking with upstream about this. twisted_client.py seems to depends on python-twisted; should that be a runtime dependency? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 414f2cebabc0824e1d834809a27842cf698af19b23b61691a4ee76105b9cdcbd pywbem- 0.7.0.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (BR: python is unnecessary but not harmful). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: pywbem = 0.7.0-1.fc12 = python(abi) = 2.6 * %check is not present; no test suite upstream. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:38:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:38:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 484049] Review Request: emacs-common-proofgeneral - Emacs mode for standard interaction interface for proof assistants In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270638.n5R6cTgH021883@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=484049 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 02:38:27 EDT --- Is anything happening with this review? Please set the fedora-review flag to '?' if a review is in progress. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:42:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270642.n5R6gQXe019500@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:42:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:42:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270642.n5R6gRbp019526@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504468 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:44:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:44:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504471] Review Request: rubygem-sinatra - Ruby-based web application framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270644.n5R6ijAh022889@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504471 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504472, 504474 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270644.n5R6ik8O022936@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:44:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:44:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270644.n5R6ik5t022914@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270646.n5R6kdn7023565@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504472 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270649.n5R6n09J023839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:48:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270648.n5R6mx2O023797@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504477] Review Request: rubygem-launchy - Helper class for cross-platform launching of applications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270649.n5R6naun023908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504477 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504480 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:48:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:48:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504476] Review Request: rubygem-newgem - Bundle Ruby libraries into a RubyGem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270648.n5R6mwwd023768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504476 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504473, 504470, 504479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:49:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270649.n5R6n0Q8023818@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504476 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:46:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:46:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504472] Review Request: rubygem-shotgun - Automatic reloading version of the rackup command In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270646.n5R6kdLG023541@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504472 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:49:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:49:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270649.n5R6nbHb023933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504477 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504468] Review Request: rubygem-treetop - A Ruby-based text parsing and interpretation DSL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270652.n5R6q296024685@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504468 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:52:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:52:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270652.n5R6q4mR024733@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:52:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:52:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270652.n5R6q5h0024759@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:52:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:52:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270652.n5R6q3hp024711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |504479 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 06:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 02:52:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504479] Review Request: rubygem-cucumber - Tool to execute plain-text documents as functional tests In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270652.n5R6q1e4024661@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504479 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |504469, 504468, 504475, | |504481 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:04:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270704.n5R74IwQ026701@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:04:17 EDT --- Builds fine and rpmlint is silent. I would suggest a tweaked %description with better grammar and capitalization: The Hilbert curve module provides some useful functions using Hilberts space- filling Curve. This is handy for things like dithering, flattening n-dimensional data, fractals - all kinds of things really. That's terribly minor, so you can fix it up if you like when you check in. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 455c2932e99a4b1609f5b17176b49a18e99fd8af06c76f161d5083d25b57d825 Math-Curve- Hilbert-0.04.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. x description could use some minor tweaks. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Math::Curve::Hilbert) = 0.04 perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert = 0.04-1.fc12 = perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Data::Dumper) perl(strict) perl(vars) * %check is present and all tests pass. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. APPROVED The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:07:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:07:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504469] Review Request: rubygem-term-ansicolor - Ruby library that colors strings using ANSI escape sequences In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270707.n5R770cm027406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-27 03:06:59 EDT --- Not applied to this package, however some notes: - If rubygem based rpm package contains %{geminstdir}/test , would you try to add %check section and execute some test program like below? http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/rubygem-hpricot/devel/rubygem-hpricot.spec?view=co https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Gem_expand_stage_change (The latter one is a draft and currently I am waiting from the feedback from any person. If you have time I will appreciate it if you comment on: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-June/msg00069.html ) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:14:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:14:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505259] Review Request: python-utmp - Python modules for utmp records In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270714.n5R7ERXp024980@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505259 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:14:25 EDT --- You should rpm rpmlint on the source rpm and final build rpms, not against the spec file. If you did that, you'd see: python-utmp.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Python modules for umtp records. python-utmp.x86_64: W: invalid-license Unlimited right to use, redistribute python-utmp.x86_64: W: invalid-license modify. python-utmp.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/python-utmp-0.7/COPYING debian/copyright python-utmp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Unlimited right to use, redistribute python-utmp-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license modify. So: Trim the dot from Summary:. You cannot just invent a license tag (especially since the field has a syntax which you are violating); you must use an approved one from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing and if one doesn't fit then you must contact the legal folks. I'll let them know. You need to actually install the text of the COPYING file, not just a symlink that goes nowhere. Legal folks, here's the license text: License loosely modelled after Just van Rossum's Python-Powered LOGO license: Radovan Garabik, hereafter referred to as THE AUTHOR, herewith grants you (THE USER) the right to use python-utmp (THE SOFTWARE). Blah blah blah blah. Blah NO WARRANTIES blah blah EXPLICIT blah blah blah blah OR IMPLIED blah blah blah. Blah. Blah blah Unlimited Redistribution and Modification of THE SOFTWARE by THE USER is Allowed by THE AUTHOR blah blah blah for Any Purpose blah blah blah blah blah blah blah. By Using THE SOFTWARE you Agree with this LICENSE blah blah blah blah. Blah. Blah. Blah blah. If you do not Agree with the LICENSE you should Better NOT Use THE SOFTWARE. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467813] Review Request: python-rendition-common - Rendition shared python modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270722.n5R7M4Jh026493@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467813 --- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:22:02 EDT --- Hmm, 3.5 months since I wrote that with no reply. I know this sat for some time, and I didn't do a full review, but it would be nice to at least see a reply to my comment. Nobody wants to do a review of a package where the submitter isn't responding, and eventually it will just end up being closed. I check www.renditionsoftware.com again and while it now actually responds (and is running CentOS instead of IIS), the URL is still invalid and I can find no mention of this particular piece of software. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:28:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:28:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476523] Review Request: python-zope-proxy - Generic Transparent Proxies In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270728.n5R7St0m027561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476523 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:28:54 EDT --- This fails to build for me: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 19, in from setuptools import setup, Extension ImportError: No module named setuptools Also, 3.5.0 was out well before this review was submitted. If an old version is being submitted intentionally, please make a note of it in the spec. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:30:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:30:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476525] Review Request: python-zc-lockfile - Basic Inter-Process Locks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270730.n5R7UZfg032671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476525 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:30:34 EDT --- This one also fails to build due to missing setuptools: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 17, in from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:32:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:32:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476526] Review Request: python-zope-event - Zope Event Publication In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270732.n5R7WWHU000490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476526 --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:32:32 EDT --- This one also fails due to missing setuptools: + /usr/bin/python setup.py build Traceback (most recent call last): File "setup.py", line 20, in from setuptools import setup, find_packages ImportError: No module named setuptools In addition, 3.4.1 is now out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491090] Review Request: kernel-firmware - firmware files for use with Linux kernel In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270757.n5R7vIcK000328@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491090 --- Comment #7 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:57:15 EDT --- Is anything happening with this package? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270759.n5R7x3Ek005321@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-27 03:59:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) Mamoru, I'm willing to sponsor Thomas after this review because he is a friend of mine. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 07:55:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 03:55:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 487978] Review Request: sqlitebrowser - Design and edit database files compatible with SQLite In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270755.n5R7tXhI004867@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487978 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(itamar at ispbrasil. | |com.br) --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 03:55:31 EDT --- It's been 3.5 months since my comment and over a months since Karel's and there's been no response. Did you still want to submit this package? Please respond soon or I'll go ahead and close this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:01:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:01:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270801.n5R81qlP001290@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #9 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-27 04:01:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > src rpm is broken (check size). probably half upload. Bad wifi at Fudcon probably. I'll update the spec and re-upload later today. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:01:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:01:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270801.n5R81ubN006147@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Richard Hughes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rhughes at redhat.com Bug 490892 depends on bug 490638, which changed state. Bug 490638 Summary: Review Request: b43-tools - Tools for the Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490638 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED --- Comment #1 from Richard Hughes 2009-06-27 04:01:55 EDT --- Peter, we need to get this reviewed as it's an important package in my personal opinion. I'll try and rally the troops. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270801.n5R813li005917@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-27 04:01:02 EDT --- > For the URL, I'd suggest just using the cgit URL for now: > > http://git.gnome.org/cgit/mutter > > (I don't think the moblin URL is appropriate.) Is there a site for it then, I couldn't even find anything basic in live.gnome.org > Some more drive-by comments: > > BuildRequires: gobject-introspection-devel > [...] > --without-introspection I took the config options from the moblin srpm. Not doubt there's more tweaking to do. > Those two conflict. We'll definitely need an introspection-enabled package of > Mutter for F12, so we can package gnome-shell. That will mean making sure that > the Clutter package is introspection enabled as well, and that we have > up-to-date versions of gobject-introspection and gir-repository packaged. The gobject-introspection is missing at least gtk/gdk ones. > BuildRequires: fontconfig-devel > BuildRequires: libglade2-devel > BuildRequires: mesa-libGL-devel > BuildRequires: xorg-x11-proto-devel > > These seem extraneous. I figured they were but I'm still having issues with the build anyway so haven't had a chance to fully optimise it. > BuildRequires: zenity > > This should be a Requires: along with a BuildRequires. > > --disable-xinerama > > Why? Option from moblin again. > At a high level, getting to packaging the gnome-shell stack for Fedora: > > gobject-introspection [already old version packaged, I think] > gir-repository [there's a review request] > clutter-0.9 > gjs > mutter > gnome-shell The gobject-introspection is 0.6.2 so one release out. I'll look at the repo package to get that in, clutter is there. Not sure about gjs but will look as well. > Is something that I want the gnome-shell team to get to soon (though probably > not until after GUADEC); and to do that, we'll definitely push out tarball > releases rather than packaging git snapshots. We're happy to have > co-maintainers and people helping out with that. Brilliant! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:14:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:14:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270814.n5R8E0tC008698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #17 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-27 04:13:59 EDT --- No, it was in fact my fault: the beta version is hardcoded in the source file URL and I forgot to change it there. Sorry for that, I've fixed it now, please check again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:24:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:24:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] New: Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Summary: Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-flipsticks.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/Flip_Sticks Description: Flipsticks is a keyframe animation activity that lets you pose and program a stick figure to walk, run, rotate, twist, tumble and dance. You can save your animations to the journal and will soon be able to share them via the mesh. Flipsticks can be used to explore concepts in geometry, computer programming and animation; it helps develop spatial and analytical thinking skills. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1438359 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11.src.rpm sugar-flipsticks.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop09 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11.noarch.rpm sugar-flipsticks.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:29:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:29:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270829.n5R8Tmg6011684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #2 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-27 04:29:46 EDT --- I also think so, Richard :) BTW I think that package should be renamed into b43-openfwwf. What you (and other people) think about it? http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-openfwwf.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-openfwwf-5.1-2.fc11.src.rpm Also I added config-file for proper loading b43-module with this firmware -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:29:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:29:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270829.n5R8TZjf006882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-27 04:29:33 EDT --- Built in koji. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:34:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270834.n5R8Yxpb007914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #3 from Richard Hughes 2009-06-27 04:34:58 EDT --- Are you sure you need the qos=0 parameter? I thought newer kernels disabled it by default if the free firmware was loaded? Anyway, I much prefer the b43-openfwwf name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:43:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:43:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] New: Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Summary: Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-infoslicer.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://sugarlabs.org/go/Activities/InfoSlicer Description: InfoSlicer downloads articles from Wikipedia so that you can create new documents by dragging and dropping content from the Wikipedia articles. You can then publish the articles as a mini website. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1438369 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11.src.rpm sugar-infoslicer.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop09 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11.noarch.rpm sugar-infoslicer.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 08:49:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 04:49:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508441] New: Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Summary: Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: fabian at bernewireless.net QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-view-slides.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/XO/sugar-view-slides-8-1.fc11.src.rpm Project URL: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/View_Slides Description: The View Slides activity is meant to allow the XO laptop to read view the contents of a Zip file containing images named sequentially. Project Gutenberg has a few books as raw scanned images, and this can be a useful format for picture books, comic books, magazine articles, photo essays, etc. The interface to View Slides is similar to the core Read activity, which should not be surprising as the toolbar code was adapted from Read's toolbar. You can use the up and down arrows or the game controller to move from page to page. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1438374 rpmlint output: [fab at laptop09 noarch]$ rpmlint sugar-view-slides-8-1.fc11.noarch.rpm sugar-view-slides.noarch: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [fab at laptop09 SRPMS]$ rpmlint sugar-view-slides-8-1.fc11.src.rpm sugar-view-slides.src: W: non-standard-group Sugar/Activities 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:35:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:35:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508351] Review Request: josm - java openstreetmap editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270935.n5R9ZU4P018636@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508351 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270947.n5R9lkxO020621@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:47:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270947.n5R9lKgt020560@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:48:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:48:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270948.n5R9menw025698@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:46:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:46:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467641] Review Request: sugar-maze - Maze for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270946.n5R9kR4L025492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467641 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #11 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 05:46:24 EDT --- python-olpcgames is still missing. I guess that I will do this package by myself. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:51:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:51:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270951.n5R9pnAY026490@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:51:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:51:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476435] Review Request: sugar-record - Recording tool for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270951.n5R9pi49026456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476435 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 05:51:42 EDT --- Now there is a tarball available. I will update the package and submit the new files here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 09:57:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 05:57:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906270957.n5R9vvgN022343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 --- Comment #2 from Michal Ingeli 2009-06-27 05:57:56 EDT --- * license ok * files listed twice: Processing files: rubygem-polyglot-0.2.5-2.fc10 warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/polyglot-0.2.5/History.txt warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/polyglot-0.2.5/License.txt warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/polyglot-0.2.5/Manifest.txt warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/polyglot-0.2.5/README.txt warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/polyglot-0.2.5/website/index.txt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271001.n5RA11D0023051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 06:01:01 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-polyglot.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-polyglot-0.2.5-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271017.n5RAHnFi030768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 06:17:47 EDT --- * package named in accordance with license guidelines * source file ok * builds fine in mock * filelist sane * requires/provides make sense, sugar package seems to drag all the required python stuff 1.) Is there any exception for non-standard groups for Sugar? A non-standard groub definitely won't block a review, but I'd interested to know APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:22:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:22:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271022.n5RAMuwl026778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 06:22:55 EDT --- * package named in accordance with license guidelines * builds fine in mock * source file ok * file lists sane * provides make sense * requires seem complete Question about Group from bug #5088440 comment 1 applies here as well. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508441] Review Request: sugar-view-slides - Image serie viewer for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271038.n5RAcIf0001593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508441 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-27 06:38:17 EDT --- * package named in accordance with license guidelines * builds fine in mock * source file ok * file lists sane * provides make sense 1.) pygame seems to be needed, but missing from Requires: /usr/share/sugar/activities/ViewSlides.activity/viewslides.py:import pygame, pygame.display /usr/share/sugar/activities/ViewSlides.activity/viewslides.py:from pygame.locals import * -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:41:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:41:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271041.n5RAfrtK029835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 06:41:50 EDT --- The spec file should be online. At the moment I have a poor connection and I'm not able to upload the SRPM. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:41:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:41:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271041.n5RAf8Do029733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-27 06:41:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > I've reviewed the package and it looks quite good. There are only minor TODOs: > - clarification about the license (I've sent a mail to fedora-legal.) > * License: TODO > - Although the meaning of the license seems to match the BSD license, I'm not > 100% sure its a real BSD license since the wording is different. Just to > confirm I've asked on the fedora-legal list for confirmation. Thanks. I've only looked cursory on the licence because frankly licenses make me queasy. If its not really an acceptable BSD like license then so be it. > - description formatting > * %description: TODO (minor) > - I would reformat the last sentence in the %description section to use up the > available space of 80 charaters. done that > - functional test > * functional test: TODO > - running it on the same machine as the X server did not work well: > - started "xscope -v1" > - started "DISPLAY=:1 gedit" in another console > - xscope displays some X11 protocol communication > - but gedit doesn't start up completly, X server + xscope + gedit hangs, it > is necessary to kill xscope by logging in via ssh... > - probably it is just wrong usage - any hints welcome ;-) Indeed the lockup you describe happens here too. In fact every time when the output of xscope itself is running over a terminal on the same server. Don't really know what to make of it. :/ . The program itslef is in a half baked state, and I am not sure it even understands the whole range of todays X server traffic but at least I've managed to succesfully use the package by redirecting the output to file or running vie another machine. It was all an attempt to debug some X slownes over ssh links. I've got the needed capture, don't know enough of X to say if its useful or not. > - package builds correctly in koji for F12 and F11, but failed for F10 I've added a patch to lower the xorg-macros requirement a bit, I don't think it has any detrimental effect on the F10 build. This fixes the build on F10. * Sun Jun 27 2009 Yanko Kaneti 1.1-2.gitfccbbd6 - Implement review feedback - Patch to build on Fedora 10 SPEC: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope.spec SRPM: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope-1.1-2.gitfccbbd6.fc12.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271043.n5RAhr14030079@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 06:43:52 EDT --- I was lucky here we go Spec URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt.spec SRPM URL: http://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/ccrypt-1.8-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:56:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:56:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271056.n5RAu5Rv032402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 06:56:04 EDT --- Thanks for reviewing this package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:53:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:53:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271053.n5RArHvr031735@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #2 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 06:53:16 EDT --- Actually I don't know the reason why this group was choosen by the guy who wrote the guidelines for sugar activities. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SugarActivityGuidelines Anyway, thanks for the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:54:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:54:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271054.n5RAsaau031885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 06:54:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-infoslicer Short Description: Downloader for articles from Wikipedia Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 10:57:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 06:57:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271057.n5RAvZDK004841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 06:57:35 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sugar-flipsticks Short Description: A keyframe animation activity for Sugar Owners: fab Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 11:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271103.n5RB3uHE005877@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 --- Comment #4 from Michal Ingeli 2009-06-27 07:03:55 EDT --- * rpmlint almost quiet - rubygem-polyglot.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/polyglot-0.2.5/log/debug.log - empty but in gems file listing so its ok * named well * clean SPEC file, American English * builds in mock * filelists, documentation ok, tests in documentation * provides and requires ok should: * run tests in %check (test/test_polyglot.rb) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 11:14:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:14:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] New: Review Request: rubygem-bacon - Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-bacon - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-bacon - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-bacon-1.1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-bacon.spec Description: Bacon is a small and lightweigt RSpec clone, providing essential spec framework features. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 11:18:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:18:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271118.n5RBIgNj003608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |rubygem-bacon - |rubygem-bacon - A | |ruby-based testing | |framework -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 11:34:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:34:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271134.n5RBYWdA011159@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508318 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 11:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271134.n5RBYVrj011126@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |469460 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-27 07:34:30 EDT --- OK. New updated spec here. http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/mutter-2.27.0-0.2.20090626gita13dec3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 11:38:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:38:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508453] New: Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508453 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: lkundrak at v3.sk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-test-spec.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-test-spec-0.10.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Test/spec layers an RSpec-inspired interface on top of Test::Unit, so you can mix TDD and BDD (Behavior-Driven Development). It is a clean-room implementation that maps most kinds of Test::Unit assertions to a should-like syntax. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 14:28:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:28:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271428.n5RESFJM009314@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dgilmore at redhat.com Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #54 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-06-27 10:28:13 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 14:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:50:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271450.n5REob4Z009062@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-06-27 10:50:36 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 14:48:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:48:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271448.n5REmksi008360@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #4 from Dennis Gilmore 2009-06-27 10:48:45 EDT --- CVS Done -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 14:49:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 10:49:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 465478] Review Request: symbolic - web application aimed to simplify management within complex enterpreise infrastructures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271449.n5REnPKV008468@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=465478 Fabian Affolter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian at bernewireless.net --- Comment #6 from Fabian Affolter 2009-06-27 10:49:24 EDT --- Symbolic 1.3.0 is available for a while now. I think that an update would be nice before somebody starts with the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271519.n5RFJPbF017912@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 11:19:24 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:19:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:19:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271519.n5RFJUvB013808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 11:19:29 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:22:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:22:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271522.n5RFMk5E018801@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #56 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 11:22:45 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blueman-1.10-3.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:21:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:21:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271521.n5RFL1PX018465@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 11:20:59 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/blueman-1.10-3.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271526.n5RFQViS015374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|RAWHIDE | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:27:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:27:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271527.n5RFROdT019757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #57 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-27 11:27:22 EDT --- Done for F10, F11, Rawhide, now its on testing! :D -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:32:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:32:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271532.n5RFWjXl016338@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 11:32:44 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:32:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:32:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271532.n5RFWoUW020708@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 11:32:49 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:33:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:33:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271533.n5RFXCsN016448@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #4 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-27 11:33:10 EDT --- *** Bug 508320 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 15:49:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 11:49:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271549.n5RFnEN8021861@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #18 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-27 11:49:12 EDT --- Terje: any news on your bug? if not i will look over this one more time and then mark it as approved... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 16:03:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:03:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271603.n5RG31Qj025364@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 16:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 12:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271623.n5RGN3c0030237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:01:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:01:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271701.n5RH1LIm003232@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:00:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:00:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271700.n5RH0Z3P004110@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #4 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-27 13:00:34 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507072] Review Request: kobby - Collaborative editor for KDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271752.n5RHqgbs011937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507072 Bug 507072 depends on bug 507070, which changed state. Bug 507070 Summary: Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:52:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:52:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507070] Review Request: libinfinity - Library implementing the infinote protocol In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271752.n5RHqgVd011912@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507070 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Ben Boeckel 2009-06-27 13:52:40 EDT --- Closing, built for rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:56:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:56:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271756.n5RHufLM012738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #19 from Terje R??sten 2009-06-27 13:56:40 EDT --- Had to reinstall the rawhide system I was testing on, now I can't reproduce the failure. In fact it just work(tm). Sorry for the noise, please continue the review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271758.n5RHwsVb013863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 504521, which changed state. Bug 504521 Summary: Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:58:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:58:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271758.n5RHwrDt013846@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-27 13:58:52 EDT --- Package in rawhide now. Thanks everyone. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271759.n5RHxIj0013134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Bug 492203 depends on bug 492201, which changed state. Bug 492201 Summary: Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 17:59:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 13:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271759.n5RHxIPU013113@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-27 13:59:16 EDT --- Package in rawhide now. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:11:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:11:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271811.n5RIBXnH015561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-27 14:11:32 EDT --- Some notes: * License tag - For this package license tag should be "LGPLv2+". * pkgconfig .pc file - openal.pc (note: see below) contains: --------------------------------------------------- 3 libdir=${exec_prefix}//usr/lib --------------------------------------------------- (on i586), which is apparently wrong. * Conflict - Fedora strongly recommends _not_ to use Conflicts: on such file namespace conflict like this and requests to resolve this type of conflicts: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Conflicts#Conflicting_Files I think - %_libdir/libopenal.so should be renamed to libopenal-soft.so - %_bindir/openal-info should be renamed to openal-soft-info - %_includedir/AL should be renamed to %_includedir/openal-soft or so (anyway the directory name "AL" is too short) - %_libdir/pkgconfig/openal.so should be renamed to openal-soft.pc and its contents should be modified to respect includedir name change - %_bindir/openal-config (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #3) > > (Removing NEEDSPONSOR) > > Mamoru, I'm willing to sponsor Thomas after this review because he is a friend > of mine. - Well, I don't know how to change sponsor of one person on FAS... Anyway you can help Thomas in any way and I am happy with it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271818.n5RIIhjn016544@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #7 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-27 14:18:42 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > - %_bindir/openal-config Ignore this line.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:30:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:30:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271830.n5RIUrN1018801@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #20 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-27 14:30:52 EDT --- [OK] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [OK] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines . [OK] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. [OK] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [OK] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [OK] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [OK] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. [OK] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding ExcludeArch line. [OK] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden. [OK] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [OK] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker. [OK] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [OK] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. [OK] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [OK] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. [OK] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. [OK] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). [OK] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly if it is not present. [OK] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. [OK] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). [OK] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g.libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. [OK] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} [OK] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. [OK] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation. [OK] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns, then please present that at package review time. [OK] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [OK] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. [OK] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [--] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [OK] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [OK] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. A package should not segfault instead of running, for example. [OK] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. [OK] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [OK] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [OK] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [JKnife at Lappy result]$ rpmlint audex-0.71-0.1.beta4.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [JKnife at Lappy result]$ rpmlint audex-debuginfo-0.71-0.1.beta4.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [JKnife at Lappy result]$ rpmlint audex-0.71-0.1.beta4.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Everything looks good.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271833.n5RIX5dB019066@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Wesley S. Hearn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Wesley S. Hearn 2009-06-27 14:33:04 EDT --- APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:54:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:54:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271854.n5RIsVOn023346@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 14:54:30 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271856.n5RIuDTo022860@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 14:56:12 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 18:57:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:57:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] New: Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 Summary: Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: guthrie at counterexample.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl-0.5.2.042-5.fc11.src.rpm SRPM URL: http://www.guthrie.info/RPMS/f11/ewl.spec Description: The Enlightenment Widget Library (EWL) is a high level toolkit providing all of the widgets you'll need to create an enlightment application. The expansive object oriented style API provides tools to easily expand widgets and containers for new situations. Among the wide variety of features EWL provides are: * Object, Widget and Container abstraction layers; * A variety of Containers for laying out widgets in arrangements such as boxes, tables and lists; * Simple widgets such as Buttons, Labels, Images and Progressbars; * Decorative Containers for wrapping borders and controls around widgets; * High level data abstractions including lists, expandable trees and combo boxes; * An extraordinarily flexible theming system; * High level abstractions to build applications quickly, such as file and color dialogs, as well as a menu system; * A flexible event system to allow application programmers to hook into nearly every change that occurs; * Abstracted EWL Engine backends allow for easily re-using portions of engines to support new platforms. * IO abstraction manager to enable mapping of mimetypes to widget representations; * EWL Test, a tutorial and testing application. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 19:52:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:52:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 475110] Review Request: monkeystudio - Free crossplatform Qt 4 IDE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271952.n5RJqnRQ032587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=475110 --- Comment #15 from Nicoleau Fabien 2009-06-27 15:52:48 EDT --- Update Spec URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/SPECS/monkeystudio.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.nicoleau-fabien.net/srpms.fc11/monkeystudio-1.8.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm changelog: - Remove 64 bits trick - Use qt4 macros - Fix some files permissions rpmlint output : [builder at FEDOBOX rpmbuild]$ rpmlint /home/builder/rpmbuild/SRPMS/monkeystudio-1.8.3.3-2.fc11.src.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/monkeystudio-1.8.3.3-2.fc11.i586.rpm /home/builder/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/monkeystudio-debuginfo-1.8.3.3-2.fc11.i586.rpm monkeystudio.i586: E: zero-length /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/All/Empty file/$File Name$ monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Qt Form/$Class Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/Objective-C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QObject Herited Class/$Base File Name$.h monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/Namespace/$Base File Name$.cpp monkeystudio.i586: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/monkeystudio/templates/C++/QWidget Herited Class/$Base File Name$.cpp 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 14 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 19:51:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 15:51:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906271951.n5RJptMp001409@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |182235(FE-Legal) Summary|Review Request: openfwwf - |Review Request: |Open FirmWare for Broadcom |b43-openfwwf - Open |43xx series WLAN chip |FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx | |series WLAN chip --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-27 15:51:53 EDT --- So, here's my primary concern. The upstream web site (and hence the README file in the package) says that you need to obtain two files from the proprietary driver, yet those files are present in the package, which makes one worry. Now, it sure looks to me as if those files are assembled from initvals.asm, which has a proper GPL header and contains plenty of comments and such which indicates that it's not simply made from dumping those two files from the proprietary driver. However, I think it would be good to get an ack from the legal folks to be absolutely sure this is acceptable. I know we have plenty of instances of random binary dumps appearing in drivers (nouveau in particular) but I don't know if there are legal restrictions on the methods for obtaining those. How does this package get along with firmware that folks might have installed by other means (b43-fwcutter)? Now, down to packaging. This builds fine; rpmlint says: b43-openfwwf.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/modprobe.d/openfwwf.conf which I believe is normal for files in modprobe.d (save any local.conf file). I would suggest a summary of: Open firmware for some Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chips Adding "some" to avoid the impression that this supports all chips, and pluralizing "chips". At least, I don't think this actually supports every 43xx chip yet. If the chipset support is as limited as I think it is, I would consider listing out the supported chips in the %description. I wouldn't do this if the list is long or if most users would be supported out of the box, but otherwise it would be nice to make it easy for users to know that chipset support is limited. * source files match upstream. sha256sum: d0bf9dbf17255a0c465afb1ff686648a1f6ce4d534f333f06c8f3a472ec18288 openfwwf- 5.1.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text included in package. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint has acceptable complaints. * final provides and requires are sane: b43-openfwwf = 5.1-2.fc12 = module-init-tools udev * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 20:10:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:10:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498846] Review Request: R-RM2 - Revenue Management and Pricing for R In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272010.n5RKAMXO003345@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498846 --- Comment #7 from Denis Arnaud 2009-06-27 16:10:21 EDT --- The dependency on R-msm (and R-mvtnorm) has been taken into account. The new versions are accessible at the following URLs: ----------------------------------------------------- Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/2/R-RM2.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/R/RM2/2/R-RM2-0.0-2.fc11.src.rpm ----------------------------------------------------- rpmlint just throws the classical warning (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/R#Generating_the_search_index.txt). So, the package seems fine for me. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 20:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272022.n5RKM4ra005212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #7 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-27 16:22:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > Are you sure you need the qos=0 parameter? I thought newer kernels disabled it > by default if the free firmware was loaded? I'm afraid, that we still need to provide config-file for modprobe, since only kernels from 2.6.30 (or even kernels from particular branches) suport this feature. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 20:18:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:18:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272018.n5RKIepp004467@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #6 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-27 16:18:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > So, here's my primary concern. The upstream web site (and hence the README > file in the package) says that you need to obtain two files from the > proprietary driver, yet those files are present in the package, which makes one > worry. It's a leftover - they started to provide these files (which contains initial values) few months ago. I'll remove this outdated piece of text from README. > How does this package get along with firmware that folks might have installed > by other means (b43-fwcutter)? It will definitely overwrite some files, dumped from proprietary blobs. So they are mutually exclusive. > I would suggest a summary of: > Open firmware for some Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chips Ok. I'll fix it. > If the chipset support is as limited as I think it is, I would consider listing > out the supported chips in the %description. OK. I'll try to find list of supported chips. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 20:42:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 16:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226309] Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272042.n5RKgGV2008330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226309 --- Comment #1 from Chris Hubick 2009-06-27 16:42:15 EDT --- Hi. I was just wondering if there was any particular reason the JDBC4 driver isn't being shipped with Fedora yet? I needed the SQL Array support, so I downloaded the upstream JDBC4 driver from the jdbc.postgresql.org site (which says "If you are using the 1.6 JVM, then you should use the JDBC4 version"), and it seems to work great for me under OpenJDK from Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 21:14:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:14:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272114.n5RLE2YA013808@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Kowaliczek 2009-06-27 17:14:01 EDT --- I think openal need to be replaced with openal-soft as it is in debian/ubuntu? The devs and communtiy is talking about this sicene F10 was under dev. What you think about that? When i will rename all wo openal-soft the tools that need oal-soft header and libs will don?t find them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 21:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 17:52:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272152.n5RLq2TQ021324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(lmacken at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #6 from Luke Macken 2009-06-27 17:52:01 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-admin-0.2.4-2.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-tgext-admin.spec * Sat Jun 27 2009 Luke Macken - 0.2.4-2 - Change %%define to %%global - Don't package the test suite -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 22:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468230] Review Request: TurboGears2 - Next generation Front-to-back web development megaframework built on Pylons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272222.n5RMMISM025366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468230 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(nobody at fedoraproj | |ect.org) --- Comment #7 from Luke Macken 2009-06-27 18:22:16 EDT --- http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2-2.0.1-1.fc10.src.rpm http://lmacken.fedorapeople.org/rpms/TurboGears2.spec * Sat Jun 27 2009 Luke Macken 2.0.1-1 - 2.0.1 - Bump our ToscaWigdets requirement to 0.9.4 - Remove TurboGears2-custom-content-type.patch, which is upstream * Sat Jun 06 2009 Luke Macken 2.0-4 - Require the new python-sqlalchemy0.5 package * Thu Jun 04 2009 Luke Macken 2.0-3 - Add a patch to fix custom content types. http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/2280 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jun 27 22:25:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 18:25:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906272225.n5RMPOiu026043@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-27 18:25:23 EDT --- bullet-2.74-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bullet-2.74-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 00:10:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:10:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280010.n5S0AOen011893@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-27 20:10:23 EDT --- The name really needs to be changed, see also the feedback on the mailing list. Rakesh, why did you first ask for feedback and then ignore it? It would have been trivial to fix this right at the beginning, now this needs to be reviewed again, and as it has been already built, the badly-named source package can't easily be removed. :-( Next time please decide the naming BEFORE approving a package! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 00:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280015.n5S0FPtL014202@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #15 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-27 20:15:24 EDT --- Oh, and also no thanks for oget for filing the CVS request without sorting out the name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 01:05:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 21:05:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280105.n5S15Ivj022414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-06-27 21:05:17 EDT --- done. http://ispbrasil.com.br/sk1/sK1.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/sk1/sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc11.src.rpm ----------------------- koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439391 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 03:34:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:34:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280334.n5S3YMue015310@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #16 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-06-27 23:34:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > The name really needs to be changed, see also the feedback on the mailing list. > Rakesh, why did you first ask for feedback and then ignore it? It would have > been trivial to fix this right at the beginning, now this needs to be reviewed > again, and as it has been already built, the badly-named source package can't > easily be removed. :-( Next time please decide the naming BEFORE approving a > package! I asked for views and saw the response yesterday and decided based on it that "SevenZip" is apt and it is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 04:25:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:25:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] New: Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Summary: Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Scriptaculous/python-Scriptaculous.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Scriptaculous/python-Scriptaculous-1.8.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439466 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 04:30:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:30:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280430.n5S4UcsX024025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |508510 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 04:30:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:30:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280430.n5S4UdrO024045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508511 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 04:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508511] New: Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508511 Summary: Review Request: python-Lightbox - Lightbox photo display widget Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: itamar at ispbrasil.com.br QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Lightbox/python-Lightbox.spec SRPM URL: http://ispbrasil.com.br/python-Lightbox/python-Lightbox-2.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Lightbox photo display widget more info in http://docs.turbogears.org/tgLightbox koji scratch build -> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439471 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 05:32:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:32:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280532.n5S5W8MN001512@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 --- Comment #5 from Ralf Corsepius 2009-06-28 01:32:07 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Anyway as you are now reviewer for this package, feel free to check -2 release. I am not the reviewer, it's you. What you are observing in bugzilla is a defect in RH's infrastructure. I am not going to proceed with this review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 07:26:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:26:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280726.n5S7Qo9I022502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 --- Comment #3 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-28 03:26:48 EDT --- * Sun Jun 28 2009 Yanko Kaneti 1.1-3.gitfccbbd6 - The software has a MIT not BSD license SPEC: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope.spec SRPM: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope-1.1-3.gitfccbbd6.fc12.src.rpm Sorry about that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 08:05:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:05:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 456684] Review Request: pathfinder - X.509 Path Discovery and Validation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280805.n5S855jH029989@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456684 Bug 456684 depends on bug 479144, which changed state. Bug 479144 Summary: Please build libwvstreams --with-dbus https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=479144 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 08:45:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:45:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280845.n5S8jWYW004103@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #22 from Terje R??sten 2009-06-28 04:45:31 EDT --- Beta 5 is released: http://opensource.maniatek.de/audex/download.html Please send a email upstream so they can add Fedora to the list on that page too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 09:12:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 05:12:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508518] New: Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508518 Summary: Review Request: Meiga - Easy tool for file sharing and content publishing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: rajeeshknambiar at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga.spec SRPM URL: http://rajeeshknambiar.fedorapeople.org/meiga-0.2.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Meiga is a lightweight, easy to use, network friendly and also application friendly content server for desktop. Client side does not need to install any software, as the shared files can be accessed using web browser. The ultimate goal is to serve as a common publishing pont for desktop applications, such as file manager, picture viewers or music players -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 09:56:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 05:56:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906280956.n5S9uaBX016362@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 --- Comment #5 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-28 05:56:35 EDT --- Well, the Rakefile requres the gem to rebuild for the tests to run, and the only existing test is about being completely useless. class TestPolyglot < Test::Unit::TestCase def setup end def test_truth assert true end end -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 10:36:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:36:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281036.n5SAaP0i023148@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Michal Ingeli 2009-06-28 06:36:23 EDT --- Hmm, that test doesn't really make sense. So it's probably OK to skip it. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 10:38:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:38:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281038.n5SAcUgw023394@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-28 06:38:29 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-polyglot Short Description: Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require Owners: lkundrak Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 10:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508521] New: Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508521 Summary: Review Request: jettison - A JSON StAX implementation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jettison.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/jettison-1.1-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Jettison is a collection of Java APIs (like STaX and DOM) which read and write JSON. This allows nearly transparent enablement of JSON based web services in services frameworks like CXF or XML serialization rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:09:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:09:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] New: Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Summary: Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bugzilla-redhat at jens.kuehnel.org QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/miredo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/miredo-1.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: Miredo is an implementation of the "Teredo: Tunneling IPv6 over UDP through NATs" proposed Internet standard (RFC4380). It can serve either as a Teredo client, a stand-alone Teredo relay, or a Teredo server. It is meant to provide IPv6 connectivity to hosts behind NAT devices, most of which do not support IPv6, and not even IPv6-over-IPv4 (including 6to4). This is my first package and I'm looking at cwickert for a sponsor. :-) rpmlint error: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/miredo/client-hook This is a script that have to be changed sometimes, for example when problems with MTU. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:10:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:10:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281110.n5SBAvOX029154@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Jens Kuehnel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla-redhat at jens.kuehne | |l.org, | |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:10:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:10:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508453] Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281110.n5SBAtRh031311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508453 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:17:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:17:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508318] Review Request: mutter - A window manager based on metacity and clutter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281117.n5SBHp2M030205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508318 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |508525 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:17:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:17:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] New: Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Summary: Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: pbrobinson at gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Blocks: 506446,508318 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora SPEC: SRPM: Gjs is a Javascript binding for GNOME. It's mainly based on Spidermonkey javascript engine and the GObject introspection framework. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:19:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:19:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281119.n5SBJfnY032684@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Jens Kuehnel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |miredo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:19:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:19:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281119.n5SBJ8Rw032619@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stjepan.gros at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-28 07:19:05 EDT --- *** Bug 437626 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:19:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:19:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 437626] Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281119.n5SBJ7ux032586@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE Alias|miredo | --- Comment #8 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-28 07:19:05 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508523 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 11:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 07:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281121.n5SBLxI7000988@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at christoph-wickert.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 12:52:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:52:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508453] Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281252.n5SCqmGo018264@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508453 --- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli 2009-06-28 08:52:47 EDT --- * naming ok * spec file clean, american english * file lists ok, examples in documentation * builds in mock * rpmlint silent * source matches upstream work to do: - package is distributed in the same terms as ruby is. So it should have ruby license or GPLv2. Not GPLv2+. - Consistent build root reference. In %clean stare it's referred to build root as %{buildroot} and other stages uses $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. - add BuildRequires: ruby(abi) = 1.8 (maybe should be checked by rpmlint) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 12:54:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:54:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508453] Review Request: rubygem-test-spec - Behaviour Driven Development interface for Test::Unit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281254.n5SCsZPP015835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508453 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 12:54:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 08:54:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281254.n5SCswc2015899@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 13:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:06:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281306.n5SD6f0T018524@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 13:03:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:03:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508525] Review Request: gjs - Javascript Bindings for GNOME In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281303.n5SD3qLn017728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508525 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |yaneti at declera.com --- Comment #1 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-28 09:03:51 EDT --- Let me fix that for you ;) SPEC: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gjs.spec SRPM: http://pbrobinson.fedorapeople.org/gjs-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 13:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281323.n5SDNUrH024284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-06-28 09:23:29 EDT --- Huh? In the mailing list thread, the submitter (Orcan Ogetbil) was the only one who thinks SevenZip is the correct name. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 13:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:44:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281344.n5SDi2vq028046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-28 09:44:00 EDT --- REVIEW for 997ca4f3248908082d1246912f93de9a miredo-1.1.6-1.fc11.src.rpm OK - MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. $ rpmlint Downloads/miredo-* miredo.i586: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/miredo/client-hook miredo.i586: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/miredo $prog miredo.i586: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/miredo-server $prog miredo-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 3 warnings. All these are ok to ignore. OK - MUST: The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. OK - MUST: The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. OK - MUST: The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. OK - MUST: The license file from the source package is included in %doc. OK - MUST: The spec file is in American English. OK - MUST: The spec file for the package is legible. OK - MUST: The sources used to build the package match the upstream source by MD5 bf49c1ddc068746760787d0cf76e40de OK - MUST: The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: The spec file handles locales properly with the %find_lang macro. OK - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: The package owns all directories that it creates. OK - MUST: The package does not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly. Every %files section includes a %defattr(...) line. OK - MUST: The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: The package consistently uses macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. OK - MUST: The package contains code, or permissable content. OK - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage. OK - MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application. N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. N/A - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'. OK - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. OK - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. N/A - MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: The packages does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - MUST: At the beginning of %install, the package runs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. OK - MUST: All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: N/A - SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. N/A - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: The the package builds in mock, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439650 OK - SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: The package functions as described. OK - SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. This is vague, and left up to the reviewers judgement to determine sanity. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. N/A - SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. Other items: OK - optflags are honored OK - timestamps are kept OK - latest version packaged Issues: - Missing Requires(%post)/Requires(%postun) for /sbin/ldconfig - Do not use %exclude, just rm during %install instead. %excluded files are still taken into account when rpm calculates the size of a package. - The files that are commented out are meant for EPEL. You should use conditionals as described in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/DistTag#Conditionals - %{_initrddir}/isatapd should be included as ghost %ghost %config(noreplace,missingok). Of course you need to create it first during %install. - One blank line between every changelog entry please Please fix the issues and I will approve the package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 13:48:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:48:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281348.n5SDmuDM026374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #3 from Jens Kuehnel 2009-06-28 09:48:55 EDT --- Spec URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/miredo.spec SRPM URL: http://www.kuehnel.org/miredo-1.1.6-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 13:58:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 09:58:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281358.n5SDwRpR030725@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 --- Comment #4 from Jens Kuehnel 2009-06-28 09:58:25 EDT --- Of course the release 2 fixed all the above mentioned issue -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 14:03:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:03:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281403.n5SE3uH4031833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-28 10:03:55 EDT --- Release -2 fixes all outstanding issues and therefor is APPROVED. Congrats! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 14:21:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:21:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508549] New: Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508549 Summary: Review Request: xml-writer - Java filter class designed to work with SAX2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sm at sandro-mathys.ch QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xml-writer.spec SRPM URL: http://red.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/xml-writer-0.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: With this filter one can use it to take a snapshot of any point in a SAX2 filter chain, as well as serializing the final result to XML (this may be important for auditing as well). rpmlint on spec, srpm and noarch-rpms finishes checking without any warnings or errors. There's no license header in the source files and even thought this is 0.2 the COPYING only says something about 0.1 being public domain. I showed this to spot during FUDCon and he said this'd be okay and should be tagged public domain. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 14:25:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:25:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281425.n5SEPsUs003642@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Christoph Wickert changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-28 10:25:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > > - Remove the empty common symlinks or make them point to something that is > > actually there, as Mamoru already said in bug 479147. > > Not fixed - please see bug 491247. My bad, I did not look into the bug. This is a general issue for all > kde-packages - my /usr/share/HTML-directory has 117 dangling common-symlinks > currently. Yeah, I knew there is a reason I was not reviewing KDE stuff... > Hmm - I've added lightweight. Adding "for KDE" doesn't really add any value to > the summary IMO. Ok for me. No more issues, the package APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 14:48:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 10:48:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468516] Review Request: verilator - A fast simulator of synthesizable Verilog HDL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281448.n5SEmIiZ004786@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468516 Bug 468516 depends on bug 478759, which changed state. Bug 478759 Summary: Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #35 from Lane 2009-06-28 10:48:13 EDT --- New files available that address the three issues in #34: Spec URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator.spec SRPM URL: http://brooks.nu/~lane/verilator-3.711-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 15:47:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 11:47:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507703] Review Request: perl-Proc-Simple - Launch and control background processes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281547.n5SFl4uS018543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507703 --- Comment #5 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-28 11:47:03 EDT --- (In reply to comment #2) > 1.) Please remove Require: perl(Test::More) dependency, the runtime does not > depend on the testing framework. > - Fixed > 2.) Licensing > > Proc/Simple.pm contains this: > # This program is free software, you can redistribute it and/or > # modify it under the same terms as Perl itself. > > Neither README nor POD documentation contains it -- please ask upstream to > include the licensing conditions there. - fixed, upstream provided new version Spec URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Proc-Simple.spec SRPM URL: http://hpejakle.fedorapeople.org/packages/perl-Proc-Simple-1.25-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 16:06:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:06:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281606.n5SG6SC9019105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-28 12:06:27 EDT --- Basically okay, however 0.4.0 is released on 2009-06-25. Would you upgrade this srpm? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 16:11:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:11:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281611.n5SGBMjr023308@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110 --- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-28 12:11:21 EDT --- (In reply to comment #8) > I think openal need to be replaced with openal-soft as it is in debian/ubuntu? > The devs and communtiy is talking about this sicene F10 was under dev. > What you think about that? - In such case (i.e. if you think openal should complete by replaced by openal-soft), would you contact openal maintainer? (Filing a bug against openal component is better with mentioning this review request on the filed bug). > When i will rename all wo openal-soft the tools that need oal-soft header and > libs will don?t find them. - This is okay because in such case it just means that such apps should be patched on Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 16:28:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281628.n5SGS0IZ023068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 --- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-28 12:27:59 EDT --- MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. 1] rpmlint complaining rubygem-syntax.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/syntax-1.0.0/test/ALL-TESTS.rb 0644 MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines - OK MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. - OK, rubygem package MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines - OK, meets packaging guidelines and ruby specific packaging guidelines MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines - OK, public domain MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. - OK, attached LICENSE file MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. - OK MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. - OK MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. - OK MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. - OK MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. - OK, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439866 MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture - OK, noarch package, builded ok MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires - OK MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. - OK, no locales available MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library - OK, no shared library MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable - OK MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. - OK MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. - OK MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. - OK MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. - OK MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content. - OK MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. - OK, no large documentation MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. - OK MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. - OK, no header files MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. - OK, no static libraries MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - OK, no .pc files MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix ... - OK MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package - OK, no -devel package MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed in the spec if they are built. - OK MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, - OK, no gui MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. - OK MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). - OK MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. -OK TODO: rpmlint -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 16:51:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:51:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281651.n5SGp6vk027234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #5 from David Nalley 2009-06-28 12:51:05 EDT --- > As in the other review, I would urge some elaboration of the acronym stew that > is the description. I left the common stuff such as SNMP and HTTP but added acronym expansions for CIM and WBEM, and a brief explanation of WBEM. > > You could drop BuildRequires: python, although it doesn't hurt anything to have > it. Done > > Are you sure it's wise to rename the executables? Of course, the other review > renamed the executables to mofcomp and pywbemcli, so perhaps there's simply no > standard for the names of these executables. Maybe it's worth checking with > upstream about this. I renamed the executables per: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Unnecessary_Byte_compilation That said, the pyc and pyo in question still get generated by setup.py, just not in bin_dir, they remain in python_sitelib. I suppose I could rename the two scripts in question in %prep. But that isn't the bug directly referenced by the packaging guidelines note. That said, I assume since Tim is at least part of upstream that his naming is ok, and thus I changed mine to reflect what his symlink names were. > > twisted_client.py seems to depends on python-twisted; should that be a runtime > dependency? It should be, thanks for catching that. It's added in the next version. > http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/pywbem.spec http://ke4qqq.fedorapeople.org/pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc11.src.rpm Thanks for the review! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 17:23:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:23:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 226309] Merge Review: postgresql-jdbc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281723.n5SHNUPO000379@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226309 --- Comment #2 from Tom Lane 2009-06-28 13:23:29 EDT --- AFAIK postgresql-jdbc.jar is a perfectly good JDBC4 driver, or at least it has as much JDBC4 support as is available from upstream. It is not my intention to ship a postgresql-jdbc4.jar symlink, unless someone explains to me why one is needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 17:42:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:42:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469553] Review Request: asleap - Recovering tool for weak LEAP and PPTP passwords In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281742.n5SHgV0t003390@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469553 --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-28 13:42:29 EDT --- It's been another month. I'll go ahead and close this ticket if nothing happens in a week. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 17:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281740.n5SHecma003205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-28 13:40:37 EDT --- Hmm, note that page on unnecessary byte compilation includes a link to the bug, which you may note was closed back in March. I know the issue was fixed in rawhide; I'm pretty sure that happened before F11 branched, so F11 should have the fix as well. Note that you picked up a new rpmlint warning: pywbem.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 13) which I don't care at all about, but you might. I suppose you could fix setup.py to install those executables in the proper place for executables, or petition upstream to do so, or do what Tim's package did and just link to them. Or leave things the way you have them; I don't think it makes a significant difference, although the current method has the dangling .pyc and .pyo files with no corresponding .py file which does seem a bit odd. Otherwise this still builds and installs, and the major issues have been fixed, so I think this is fine. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 17:57:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:57:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281757.n5SHveqT005810@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 Jan Klepek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) --- Comment #4 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-28 13:57:39 EDT --- ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 17:56:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 13:56:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504481] Review Request: rubygem-builder - Provide a simple way to create XML markup and data structures In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281756.n5SHu9uh008614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504481 --- Comment #3 from Jan Klepek 2009-06-28 13:56:08 EDT --- 1] during build following error is shown: ERROR: While generating documentation for builder-2.1.2 ... MESSAGE: Unhandled special: Special: type=17, text="" 2] rpmlint is complaining rubygem-builder.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/builder-2.1.2/test/performance.rb -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 18:02:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:02:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281802.n5SI209x009570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 David Nalley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from David Nalley 2009-06-28 14:02:00 EDT --- Thanks for the review. I'll fix the space/tab issue before the spec hits CVS. I'll talk to upstream about how they'd like to see the executables handled. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: pywbem Short Description: Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface Owners: ke4qqq Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 18:09:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:09:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504475] Review Request: rubygem-polyglot - Allow hooking of language loaders for specified extensions into require In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281809.n5SI9dKo007825@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504475 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-28 14:09:38 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 18:10:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:10:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281810.n5SIAEtu011288@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-28 14:10:13 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 18:27:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 14:27:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281827.n5SIRpVB014237@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-06-28 14:27:49 EDT --- I'd maintain it. I'll go ahead and request access to the existing branches. Go ahead and also add me as the owner of the EL branches. This program is very useful. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:12:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 471575] Review Request: libnautilus-vcards - Nautilus vcard context menu extension In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281912.n5SJClpG018604@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=471575 --- Comment #14 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-28 15:12:45 EDT --- I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:09:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:09:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281909.n5SJ9gRG017852@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 --- Comment #19 from Ralf Ertzinger 2009-06-28 15:09:42 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: pwsafe New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:09:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:09:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281909.n5SJ9jcD017879@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281911.n5SJBddX021544@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-28 15:11:38 EDT --- Assigning. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504473] Review Request: rubygem-rubigen - A framework to allow Ruby applications to generate file/folder stubs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281911.n5SJBLpr021478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504473 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-28 15:11:20 EDT --- Some notes for 1.5.2-3: * License tag - As website/javascripts/rounded_corners_lite.inc.js is under LGPLv2+, license tag should be "MIT and LGPLv2+". * Requires - rubygem(hoe) doesn't seem to be needed. Would you check this? * Test - I think as this gem file contains test/ directory, it is preferable to add %check section and execute some tet program there (another gem seems needed, though) By the way, I would appreciate it if you would review my review requests (bug 508416 or bug 508417, both are rubygem related) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:13:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:13:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281913.n5SJDb9M018781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #20 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-28 15:13:36 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:13:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:13:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472696] Review Request: vcards-daemon - manage evolution contacts as vcards In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281913.n5SJDVF7018750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472696 --- Comment #6 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-28 15:13:29 EDT --- I will close this bug if no response is received from the reporter within ONE WEEK. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:18:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:18:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281918.n5SJIp86022571@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 Peter Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #13 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-28 15:18:49 EDT --- Pushed to rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:18:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:18:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506855] Review Request hornsey - The moblin media player In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281918.n5SJIsZ3022650@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506855 Bug 506855 depends on bug 506721, which changed state. Bug 506721 Summary: Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:18:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:18:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507223] Review Request: dalston - Moblin System Information Icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281918.n5SJItZQ022671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507223 Bug 507223 depends on bug 506721, which changed state. Bug 506721 Summary: Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:18:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:18:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507243] Review Request carrick - Moblin GUI for Connection Manger In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281918.n5SJIuLU022693@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507243 Bug 507243 depends on bug 506721, which changed state. Bug 506721 Summary: Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506804] Package Review: anerley - Moblin widgets for people information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281918.n5SJIrCG022629@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506804 Bug 506804 depends on bug 506721, which changed state. Bug 506721 Summary: Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA Resolution| |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:28:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:28:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281928.n5SJScHB024502@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-28 15:28:37 EDT --- pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281928.n5SJShwJ024543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-28 15:28:42 EDT --- pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:44:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:44:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 496433] Tracker: packages from Russian Fedora Remix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281944.n5SJitYj027294@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496433 Bug 496433 depends on bug 495001, which changed state. Bug 495001 Summary: Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 19:44:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:44:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 495001] Review Request: bareftp - File transfer client supporting the FTP, FTP over SSL/TLS (FTPS) and SSH File Transfer Protocol (SFTP) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906281944.n5SJismK027257@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495001 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |lemenkov at gmail.com Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #17 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-28 15:44:52 EDT --- I think, we may close this ticket. Anyway, F-9 will be EOLed very soon. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 20:02:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:02:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282002.n5SK2Odm027460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #14 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-28 16:02:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #13) > Pushed to rawhide Please make the changes I noted in my previous comments. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 20:19:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:19:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247482] Review Request: pwsafe - A unix command line utility that manages encrypted password databases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282019.n5SKJMoS030629@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247482 Jonathan Steffan changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Steffan 2009-06-28 16:19:21 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112018 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112023 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 20:59:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:59:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282059.n5SKx3sh005548@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #15 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-28 16:59:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #14) > (In reply to comment #13) > > Pushed to rawhide > > Please make the changes I noted in my previous comments. The one about the git snapshots? I'm not using git snapshots. You can see all the releases here http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/nbtk/refs/ The URL is correct. Also there is no HACKING file in the 0.11.1 tar ball and the README contains information for building it, which given its a binary package, isn't relevant to the RPM. There is also no plan to push any of the moblin stuff to F-11 or earlier as there are too many missing dependencies. I don't believe I've missed anything else. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 21:16:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:16:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282116.n5SLGU1V009105@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #16 from Nikolay Vladimirov 2009-06-28 17:16:29 EDT --- > The one about the git snapshots? I'm not using git snapshots. You can see all > the releases here http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/nbtk/refs/ The URL is correct. Ok, sorry about that. > Also there is no HACKING file in the 0.11.1 tar ball and the README contains > information for building it, which given its a binary package, isn't relevant > to the RPM. Ok. > There is also no plan to push any of the moblin stuff to F-11 or > earlier as there are too many missing dependencies. I don't believe I've missed > anything else. Even that you do not plan to push moblin to F-11 someone else can try to rebuild the package for his own purpose. It's better to have the version listed. It's a minor thing that can save someone's time. Also the changelog in the .spec states that the last version of the package is 0.9.3 . -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 21:31:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:31:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506721] Package Review: nbtk - A toolkit for moblin NetBooks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282131.n5SLVCXR014406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506721 --- Comment #17 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-28 17:31:11 EDT --- > Even that you do not plan to push moblin to F-11 someone else can try to > rebuild the package for his own purpose. It's better to have the version > listed. It's a minor thing that can save someone's time. I'm updated it although I really don't see much point as they're going to run into lots of other issues as most of the entire stack isn't supported on F11 and its not much use for much else. > Also the changelog in the .spec states that the last version of the package is > 0.9.3 . Oops. Updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 21:40:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:40:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 439772] Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282140.n5SLe9L5013136@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info --- Comment #24 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-06-28 17:40:05 EDT --- Is there any movement??? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 21:42:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:42:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282142.n5SLgWhB016180@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 --- Comment #23 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-28 17:42:31 EDT --- Terje: I am in close tontact with upstream and will inform them about the packages once they are available. Also, I will build the Beta 5 when the current, approved version beta 4 has been build successfully. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 21:46:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282146.n5SLk02v016834@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Roland Wolters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Roland Wolters 2009-06-28 17:45:59 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: audex Short Description: Audio ripper Owners: liquidat Branches: F-10 F-11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jun 28 23:12:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:12:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507916] Review Request: javanotes - Introduction to Programming Using Java, By David J. Eck In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906282312.n5SNCK9o028583@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507916 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-28 19:12:19 EDT --- There's not much to this package. You're right that the dist tag isn't necessary, but do keep in mind that not having it will not reduce download time as each release is signed with a different key (and hence the packages are different anyway), and you will be responsible for making sure that the release you push to F11 has a different version than what you push to F10 (and from what you push to devel). But that's up to you; the dist tag only makes this convenient. Just don't be surprised when you get "tag already exists" errors. Packaging-wise there's not much to talk about; the package just unpacks a tarball and drops it under /usr/share/doc. One issue that bothers me, though, is that the directory isn't versioned, unlike essentially every other directory in /usr/share/doc. The package I'd compare this against, diveintopython, versions its directory. Did you consider doing that? * source files match upstream. sha256sum: 74f5c1a2525ea735f2f460dd36f416b6728ad7cdf4ef2d4a42a2d0e6686c5d43 javanotes5.tar.bz2 * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper (none). * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: javanotes = 5.1-1 = (none) * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * no generically named files. * acceptable content. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 02:25:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502614] Review Request: stfl - STFL implements a curses-based widget set for text terminals In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290225.n5T2PiQb001564@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502614 --- Comment #11 from Byron Clark 2009-06-28 22:25:43 EDT --- New upstream version. Should be rpmlint clean. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/stfl-0.21-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 02:43:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:43:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 426752] Review Request: ghc-X11-xft - Haskell binding to Xft In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290243.n5T2hNWG004695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426752 --- Comment #15 from Zach Oglesby 2009-06-28 22:43:21 EDT --- Updated http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft-0.2-3.fc11.src.rpm http://zoglesby.fedorapeople.org/ghc-X11-xft.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 03:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:30:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503336] Review Request: newsbeuter - console based feed reader In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290330.n5T3Ugx9013630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503336 Byron Clark changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(byron at theclarkfam | |ily.name) | --- Comment #7 from Byron Clark 2009-06-28 23:30:40 EDT --- Updated. Spec URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter.spec SRPM URL: http://theclarkfamily.name/fedora/newsbeuter-2.0-6.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 04:29:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:29:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290429.n5T4Trl3023295@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-29 00:29:52 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1437534 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 0ec5881a3260262bdb9bab67befff8076e68633a DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.10.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=6, Tests=51, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.04 usr 0.01 sys + 0.59 cusr 0.06 csys = 0.70 CPU) + Package perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.10-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(DateTime::Format::SQLite) = 0.10 Requires: perl(strict) perl(vars) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 05:40:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:40:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290540.n5T5ecwX003895@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-29 01:40:37 EDT --- python-ctags-1.0.5-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-ctags-1.0.5-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 05:57:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:57:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290557.n5T5vTtW003600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 05:57:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 01:57:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290557.n5T5vR0A003579@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 --- Comment #2 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-29 01:57:26 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite Short Description: Parse and format SQLite dates and times Owners: cweyl Branches: F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 08:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] New: Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Summary: Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris at chriscowley.me.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nehemiah.chriscowley.me.uk/trac/phpeclipse/export/2/trunk/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://nehemiah.chriscowley.me.uk/trac/phpeclipse/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-17.src.rpm Description: The PHPeclipse plugin allows developers to write PHP webpages and scripts in Eclipse. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 08:55:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 04:55:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508629] New: Review Request:
- Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request:
- https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508629 Summary: Review Request:
- Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: chris at chriscowley.me.uk QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://nehemiah.chriscowley.me.uk/trac/phpeclipse/export/2/trunk/eclipse-phpeclipse.spec SRPM URL: http://nehemiah.chriscowley.me.uk/trac/phpeclipse/raw-attachment/wiki/WikiStart/eclipse-phpeclipse-1.1.8-17.src.rpm Description: The PHPeclipse plugin allows developers to write PHP webpages and scripts in Eclipse. This is my first package and I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 09:05:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:05:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290905.n5T95vBc009508@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |akurtako at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-29 05:05:57 EDT --- This plugin is already packaged. Look here https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/eclipse-phpeclipse. And it is newer version than the one you submitted. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 09:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290908.n5T988mT013467@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-29 05:08:06 EDT --- *** Bug 508629 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 09:08:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:08:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508629] Review Request:
- In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290908.n5T987JT013442@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508629 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |akurtako at redhat.com Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-29 05:08:06 EDT --- This is the same request like #508630. Closing this one because it has wrong summary. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508630 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 09:17:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:17:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508510] Review Request: python-Scriptaculous - Scriptaculous packaged as TurboGears widgets. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290917.n5T9HMgw015366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508510 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-29 05:17:20 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439466 + rpmlint output for SRPM and for RPM. python-Scriptaculous.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Scriptaculous-1.8.2-py2.6.egg-info/not-zip-safe ==> can be ignored I guess as these are zero length files. + source files match upstream url f01e40103607f5255e624e216c2bd1d52e86435a Scriptaculous-1.8.2.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application Sugeestions: 1) Source URL should be http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/L/Scriptaculous/Scriptaculous-%{version}.tar.gz 2) %doc should be %doc README.txt PKG-INFO 3) Why there is some comments related to LICENSE file? Remove that. 4) Change %define to %global -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 09:29:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:29:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504403] Review Request: perl-Cache-Memcached - Perl client for memcached In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290929.n5T9ThVq014281@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504403 Michael Fleming changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 09:56:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 05:56:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906290956.n5T9uD94020209@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #8 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-29 05:56:10 EDT --- walters: It seems this has been committed to cvs but not built. Any issues with my updating it to the latest release and building it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 10:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:02:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291002.n5TA2bRF024475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-06-29 06:02:34 EDT --- Thanks, but that package is missing all patches and it does not build any more. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 10:46:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:46:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291046.n5TAkKxC001401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #8 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-29 06:46:18 EDT --- http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-openfwwf.spec http://peter.fedorapeople.org/b43-openfwwf-5.1-3.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Mon Jun 29 2009 Peter Lemenkov 5.1-3 - Changed README a lot - Changed description -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:03:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508239] Review Request: perl-Hash-Merge - Merges arbitrary deep hashes into a single hash In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291103.n5TB34TY000908@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508239 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-29 07:03:02 EDT --- Re-Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:11:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291111.n5TBBSv7006570@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Jeroen van Meeuwen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #27 from Jeroen van Meeuwen 2009-06-29 07:11:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #26) > So, Jeroen, if you want to be the maintainer of this package, > I will be happy with it. Please set cvs flag again. Thanks Mamoru, and sorry for the delay. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: rubygem-mocha Short Description: Mocking and stubbing library Owners: kanarip Branches: EL-4 EL-5 F-10 F-11 devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:15:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291115.n5TBFONi003807@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #3 from Chris Cowley 2009-06-29 07:15:23 EDT --- It is however not available in EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:28:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:28:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291128.n5TBSO3P009921@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 --- Comment #2 from Ngo Than 2009-06-29 07:28:24 EDT --- >0. drop the epoch, this is a new pkg it's fixed >1. missing desktop-file-install/desktop-file-validate is it really required to use desktop-file-install/desktop-file-validate? >2. missing icon/mime scriptlets add missing update-mime-database, it's fixed >3. do we really want/need >Provides: kdepim4 = %{version}-%{release} >here? it's not needed, drop it >4. Source URL is wrong (s/stable/unstable), but that's minor it's fixed new specs and srpm uploaded -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:36:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:36:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291136.n5TBaavj011760@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Alexander Kurtakov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora at matbooth.co.uk --- Comment #4 from Alexander Kurtakov 2009-06-29 07:36:34 EDT --- I'm not sure about the EPEL procedures but shouldn't this be a new cvs request from the current maintainer instead of new package review? I'm adding Mat (phpeclipse maintainer) on CC. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:40:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:40:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291140.n5TBebYH009255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #9 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-29 07:40:35 EDT --- Notes: * Wrong category for desktop-file-install. It should be "Graphics" instead of "Development". Easy to fix. * Since it provides skencil and sketch, I suggest you to add "Obsoletes" for sketch as well. However, I'm not sure about it, since I cannot remember, did sketch was included in Fedora or not. Anyway, here is my REVIEW: - rpmlint is not silent: [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ rpmlint sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc12.i586.rpm sK1.i586: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/sk1/__init__.py 0644 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. [petro at Workplace Desktop]$ This file contains shebang, and therefore rpmlint thinks of its as a script. Easyfix. + The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines . + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. + The files, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, are included in %doc. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible (as usual for python apps and libraries). +/- The sources used to build the package matches the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. Unfortunately, your URL is wrong. Please fix it [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ sha256sum sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730.tar.gz* 56d4b58d30b52e97dccb81ce157e41c2b6b5f0c0c383b0f4c55bacb317443c84 sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730.tar.gz 56d4b58d30b52e97dccb81ce157e41c2b6b5f0c0c383b0f4c55bacb317443c84 sk1-0.9.1pre_rev730.tar.gz.1 [petro at Sulaco SOURCES]$ + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. See koji link above. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. + No extra large documentation files. + Everything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. + The package includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + At the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8. Please fix mentioned issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 11:56:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 07:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291156.n5TButeB016371@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 David Hannequin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(david.hannequin at g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #5 from David Hannequin 2009-06-29 07:56:53 EDT --- Hi, 1] I fixed URL source. 2] I fixed summary. 3] desktop file don't work, i must read more seriously documentation (WIP). 4] I don't see duplicated file. 5] I put two files with the rights in 0755 to be executable by everyone. 6] I use this software to routinely test the web sites and in the case of an abandonment of the application by the author I would development. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-3.fc10.src.rpm Sorry for the delay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 12:24:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:24:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506681] Review Request: autodafe - Fuzzing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291224.n5TCOiaA022872@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506681 Jan F. Chadima changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #7 from Jan F. Chadima 2009-06-29 08:24:41 EDT --- build as http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=112087 thanks for the patch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 12:23:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:23:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291223.n5TCNuDV019009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Harald Hoyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Harald Hoyer 2009-06-29 08:23:55 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: dracut Short Description: dracut is a new, event-driven initramfs infrastructure based around udev. Owners: harald Branches: F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 12:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 08:32:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291232.n5TCWsi0024753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #5 from Mat Booth 2009-06-29 08:32:53 EDT --- Actually there is already an EL branch: http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/eclipse-phpeclipse/EL-5/ However, I've never built that branch for as long as I've been maintaining phpeclipse. (Shameful, I know.) If you like, I will see if I can get it built and get an update out. I have no co-maintainers for this package yet, so once you get sponsored please feel free to apply for co-maintainer-ship and help me look after it. ;-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 13:32:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:32:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291332.n5TDWHtT004037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |rdieter at math.unl.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-29 09:32:17 EDT --- Yes, 1, is needed, for items under /usr/share/applications/, but we can deal with that post-review, I won't consider it a blocker for now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 13:34:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:34:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291334.n5TDYtDF004506@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-29 09:34:54 EDT --- Ah, I see you added it, good. The rest looks good now, can't test buildability/runtime yet, but we'll deal with that when the rest of kde-4.3-rc2 is built. APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 14:14:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:14:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto.spec Description: CGI::Application::Plugin::ConfigAuto adds easy access to config file variables to your CGI::Application modules. Lazy loading is used to prevent the config file from being parsed if no configuration variables are accessed during the request. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 14:13:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:13:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] New: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 Summary: Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: emmanuel.seyman at club-internet.fr QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch/perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: This module provides a way (as a mod_perl handler or running under vanilla CGI) to look at the path (as returned by dispatch_path) of the incoming request, parse off the desired module and it's run mode, create an instance of that module and run it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 14:22:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:22:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291422.n5TEMIJQ017668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ngo Than 2009-06-29 10:22:17 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: kdepim-runtime Short Description: KDE PIM Runtime Environment Owners: than Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 15:18:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:18:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 472150] Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291518.n5TFIlxX032048@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 J R Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |zaniyah at gmail.com --- Comment #17 from J R Jones 2009-06-29 11:18:44 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > > Spec URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot.spec > SRPM URL: http://www.stanford.edu/~fenn/packs/coot-0.5.2-3.fc11.src.rpm Not sure if anyone has noticed, but I just built this in koji and found it is missing a BuildRequires: ghostscript (It uses ps2pdf, which doesn't appear to be provided by anything else). Of course I am building against a RHEL/CentOS 5.3 rebuild so I'm not sure if something magic^Wdifferent happens for FC11 here? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 15:34:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:34:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291534.n5TFYew8009248@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 Bug 497688 depends on bug 497682, which changed state. Bug 497682 Summary: Review Request: libmemcached - Client library and command line tools for memcached server https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497682 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-29 11:34:39 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.2.0-1.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-memcached-0.2.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 15:36:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:36:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497688] Review Request: php-pecl-memcached - Extension to work with the Memcached caching daemon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291536.n5TFaQ4p004320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497688 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-29 11:36:26 EDT --- php-pecl-memcached-0.2.0-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-pecl-memcached-0.2.0-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:05:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:05:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506844] Review Request: audex - kde4 audio ripper In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291705.n5TH5YrW026587@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506844 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #25 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 13:05:33 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:07:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:07:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459892] Review Request: rubygem-mocha - Mocking and stubbing library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291707.n5TH78sp026854@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459892 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #28 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 13:07:06 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:08:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:08:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508349] Review Request: kdepim-runtime - KDE PIM Runtime Environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291708.n5TH8x43001168@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508349 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 13:08:58 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:06:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:06:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291706.n5TH6IZB000766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 13:06:17 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:08:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:08:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291708.n5TH844s027033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 13:08:03 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:27:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:27:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291727.n5THRj1N032167@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544 --- Comment #3 from Rasmus Ory Nielsen 2009-06-29 13:27:44 EDT --- Hi Jason, Thank you for the review. I will fix the %description field when I check the package in. Best regards, Rasmus -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:37:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291737.n5THbJak002128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Bug 507958 depends on bug 507710, which changed state. Bug 507710 Summary: Add OSGi metadata to MANIFEST https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507710 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:36:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:36:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291736.n5THaqK6009414@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Bug 507958 depends on bug 507693, which changed state. Bug 507693 Summary: Add OSGi metadata to MANIFEST https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507693 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:54:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:54:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291754.n5THsnv5009020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958 Andrew Overholt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |overholt at redhat.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |overholt at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt 2009-06-29 13:54:47 EDT --- Thanks for the submission, Jeff. A few comments: - I think you're missing Requires on eclipse-cdt and eclipse-emf - will we move to 3.1 once we get a Galileo CDT build? - please use either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but not both - we should perhaps have Eclipse in the Summary field - I think "framework" can be dropped from the Summary field - please change the permissions on the fetch script to avoid this rpmlint warning: eclipse-rse.src: W: strange-permission fetch-rse.sh 0775 - you should probably mark a top-level feature's about.html as %doc - you should look for @build@ and replace it with the same qualifier that upstream uses. In fact, you should use forceContextQualifier (see eclipse-mylyn.spec for an example) to ensure our versions are the same as upstream's for 3.0.3 The package builds for me, follows the packaging guidelines, and functions in Eclipse. Thanks for the high quality submission. Once the minor issues above are cleaned up, I will approve this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:58:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:58:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291758.n5THwBKb017077@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-29 13:58:10 EDT --- Some notes: * Naming - I think this srpm must be named as just php-pear-HTML_Javascript. * Directory ownership issue / %files entry - (At least) on rawhide %{pear_phpdir}/ is expanded as /usr/share/pear so ------------------------------------------------------------- %files %{pear_phpdir}/* ------------------------------------------------------------- contains all files/directories/etc under /usr/share/pear. On the other hand %{pear_xmldir} as /usr/share/pear/.pkgxml and %{pear_testdir} as /usr/share/pear/test, so current %files entry causes duplicate file list: ------------------------------------------------------------- warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/pear/test/HTML_Javascript warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/pear/test/HTML_Javascript/tests warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/pear/test/HTML_Javascript/tests/js.php warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/pear/test/HTML_Javascript/tests/output.php ------------------------------------------------------------- - Also the following directories (themselves) are already owned by php-common so this rpm should not own them. ------------------------------------------------------------- /usr/share/pear/doc /usr/share/pear/test ------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 18:11:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:11:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291811.n5TIBFg4022727@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lokthare at gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 14:11:12 EDT --- *** Bug 448122 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 18:11:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:11:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 448122] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line trashcan (recycle bin) interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291811.n5TIBEqM022697@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #39 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 14:11:12 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 508750 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 17:45:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 13:45:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508750] New: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 Summary: Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: sundaram at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/trash-cli.spec SRPM URL: http://sundaram.fedorapeople.org/packages/trash-cli-0.11.1.2-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: trash-cli provides a command line trash usable with GNOME, KDE, Xfce or any freedesktop.org compatible trash implementation. The command line interface is compatible with rm and you can use trash as an alias to rm. A previous review request submitted was stalled and closed. This is a attempt to revive it from where it was left off. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 18:36:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 14:36:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291836.n5TIaZqr024832@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-29 14:36:33 EDT --- Some notes: * License - What is the purpose of including PHP 3.01 license text in the srpm? Actually this package is licensed under PHPv2 (not v3) and we generally don't allow to use "external" license texts not included in the source tarball unless the upstream developer explicitly declared to use the license. * Naming - For naming see bug 508075 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 19:15:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:15:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291915.n5TJFRK5014992@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 --- Comment #2 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-29 15:15:26 EDT --- Well, basically okay, however - please consider to add %check section and execute some test program. - perhaps %ruby_sitelib macro is not needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 19:33:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:33:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291933.n5TJXGrj019847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Sven Lankes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Sven Lankes 2009-06-29 15:33:15 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: skanlite Short Description: Lightweight scanning program Owners: slankes Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 19:31:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 15:31:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480851] Review Request: ccrypt - Secure encryption and decryption of files and streams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906291931.n5TJVmKg019582@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480851 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Dan Hor?k 2009-06-29 15:31:45 EDT --- Everything looks OK now, tests are passed, the ExcludeArch blocker bug can be removed. It could hardly be better :-) This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 20:14:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:14:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 485638] Review Request: dmenu - Dynamic X menu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292014.n5TKE4cX032623@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=485638 Jan Blazek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jblazek at redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Jan Blazek 2009-06-29 16:14:01 EDT --- (In reply to comment #11) Hi, thank you your suggestions. You're right about the blank line consistency and Source vs Source0, although it doesn't affect the functionality. New SPEC: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu.spec New SRPM: http://www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xblaze17/packages/dmenu/dmenu-4.0-3.fc10.src.rpm PS: I'd also love to see this package in Fedora :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 20:31:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:31:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502227] Review Request: virtuoso-opensource - A high-performance object-relational SQL database In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292031.n5TKVW8E004695@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502227 --- Comment #11 from Lorenzo Villani 2009-06-29 16:31:31 EDT --- Issues are fixed. I agree with you regarding directory ownership so this isn't an issue anymore. There's just one MUST item left: the -doc subpkg. Virtuoso has lot of stuff in docsrc/ and HTML pages can be generated out of it. I suggest to generate just the HTML and package in a -doc subpackage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 21:50:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:50:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292150.n5TLosmj023497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 17:50:52 EDT --- I'd say this looks fine. At this point all I'd like to see is an ack from legal that they're OK with this, and then I think we can go ahead. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292208.n5TM80Dq018641@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-29 18:07:59 EDT --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1442998 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:07:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:07:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292207.n5TM7TNN018570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-29 18:07:29 EDT --- Thanks! New package (just done as you suggested; removed useless macro and added test run & its dependency): SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-bacon-1.1.0-2.fc11.src.rpm SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-bacon.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:09:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:09:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292209.n5TM9N9U026896@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-29 18:09:22 EDT --- * Package has been renamed * Directory ownership has been fixed. Updated Spec and SRPMS SPEC: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML_Javascript.spec SRPM: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:10:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:10:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292210.n5TMAKMU027339@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #10 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-06-29 18:10:18 EDT --- please look again http://ispbrasil.com.br/sk1/sK1.spec http://ispbrasil.com.br/sk1/sK1-0.9.1-0.1.pre_rev730.fc11.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443019 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:14:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:14:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292214.n5TMENNG019798@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-29 18:14:22 EDT --- I added the License file because the package does not provide any documentation causing rpmlint to return no-documentation error, the package is actually Licensed as PHP 3.01 according to the link on its web page. * I have removed the license file. * Renamed to match upstream as recommended. Updated Spec and SRPMS SPEC: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-Auth-HTTP/php-pear-Auth_HTTP.spec SRPMS: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-Auth-HTTP/php-pear-Auth_HTTP-2.1.6-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:23:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:23:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507410] Review Request: yum-download-order - Yum plugin to order downloading of packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292223.n5TMNCsu029524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507410 Sergio Pascual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual 2009-06-29 18:23:11 EDT --- Rakesh, the tarball upstream doesn't match the source in rpm. Please upload the new tarball so that I can write the review. Other things: * why do you need python-setuptools-devel?, python-setuptools is enough to build and install most python applications. * the current recommended macro for python_sitelib is: %{!?python_sitelib: %global python_sitelib %(%{__python} -c "from distutils.sysconfig import get_python_lib; print get_python_lib()")} just change define by global http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python * download-order.py has a shebang in the first line. As this file isn't a script intended to be run by users, I think its better to remove it (when we also remove a rpmlint error) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508417] Review Request: rubygem-ruby-opengl - OpenGL Interface for Ruby In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292249.n5TMndiW001853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508417 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:48:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:48:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292248.n5TMmUnR026589@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel 2009-06-29 18:48:29 EDT --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SPECS/rubygem-rack-test.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/gdc-ruby-stack/SRPMS/rubygem-rack-test-0.4.0-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 22:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508416] Review Request: rubygem-mkrf - Making C extensions for Ruby a bit easier In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292249.n5TMnaYl026707@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508416 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |lkundrak at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |lkundrak at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 23:21:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:21:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292321.n5TNLWkY008215@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Christian Krause 2009-06-29 19:21:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #3) > * Sun Jun 28 2009 Yanko Kaneti 1.1-3.gitfccbbd6 > - The software has a MIT not BSD license > > SPEC: http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope.spec > SRPM: > http://www.declera.com/~yaneti/xscope/xscope-1.1-3.gitfccbbd6.fc12.src.rpm Thank you very much for the update. All mentioned issues were addressed: * License: OK - got clarification from the fedora-legal mailing list: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-June/msg00045.html - License is MIT according to the COPYING file - License of source files matches actual license (I've roughly scanned over the sources...) - MIT acceptable for Fedora - COPYING file packaged * %description: OK * compilation: OK - package builds now fine in F10 The small problem that it is not possible let the program put its output in an xterm running on the same X-server which is used to connect the clients I would not consider as a major problem. This tool is for debugging anyway and since e.g. logging into a file works fine on the same machine this issue will not hold back the approval. -> APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jun 29 23:34:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:34:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506581] Review Request: xscope - X Window Protocol Viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906292334.n5TNYZv4002649@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506581 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-29 19:34:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: xscope Short Description: X Window Protocol Viewer Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 00:08:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:08:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492979] Review Request: python-cliutils - A collection of utilities easing the creation of command line scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300008.n5U088aH017849@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492979 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-29 20:08:06 EDT --- It's been far too long with no response from the submitter; I'll close this out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 00:33:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:33:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508373] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite - Parse and format SQLite dates and times In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300033.n5U0XEC2013849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508373 Chris Weyl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE --- Comment #4 from Chris Weyl 2009-06-29 20:33:13 EDT --- Thanks for the review! :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 00:56:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 20:56:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 478506] Review Request: trac-customfieldsadmin-plugin - expose ticket custom fields via web admin interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300056.n5U0uZVL027756@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478506 Jon Stanley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Jon Stanley 2009-06-29 20:56:34 EDT --- Oops, forgot to do CVS on this one :) New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: trac-customfieldadmin-plugin Short Description: Administer custom fields from web admin interface Owners: jstanley Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 03:22:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:22:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508817] New: Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Summary: Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: eric at christensenplace.us QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/limesurvey/limesurvey.spec SRPM URL: http://sparks.fedorapeople.org/Packages/limesurvey/limesurvey-1.85-1.src.rpm Description: Limesurvey is an open source, web-based survey application that is easy to setup and use. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 03:18:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:18:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489014] Review Request: gnome-do-plugins - Plugins for Gnome Do In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300318.n5U3ICst015996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489014 --- Comment #35 from Juan Manuel Rodriguez 2009-06-29 23:18:08 EDT --- Paul, I tried building gnome-do-plugins against that build, but had an error. Upon inspection, I see that we used ${libdir} instead of ${_libdir}, so it wasn't building on 586. I don't remember getting this error when I tried it last time, but it could've skipped my mind. The fix is simple, just replace both on flickrnet.pc. Here's the koji build of my failed gnome-do-plugins: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443229 And the build for the succesfull flickrnet.pc http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443247 --- David, I downloaded the pl file and executed it against gnome-do-plugins tar.bz2 and against the flickrnet code, but the patch was empty in both cases, with just a comment that says: # SourceFucker.pl: Fix hardcoded references to libdir Maybe I'm using it wrong? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 03:25:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:25:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300325.n5U3Pdas017570@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ian at ianweller.org AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ian at ianweller.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ian Weller 2009-06-29 23:25:38 EDT --- I'll review this tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 03:25:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:25:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300325.n5U3PrLA025617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 03:48:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:48:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300348.n5U3mjrm030097@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 03:49:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 23:49:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300349.n5U3nL05022434@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 05:11:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:11:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300511.n5U5BBRD004991@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 05:10:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:10:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 488995] Review Request: pidgin-tlen - Tlen IM Pidgin plugin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300510.n5U5AkOv004865@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488995 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Depends on| |504493 Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #7 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-30 01:10:45 EDT --- 2 months without response. i will close this. please feel free to reopen it again, without a local copy of libtlen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 05:13:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:13:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503013] Review Request: gnaughty - Downloader for adult content In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300513.n5U5DOuG005312@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503013 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(tcallawa at redhat.c | |om) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 05:17:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 01:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489830] Review Request: figlet - FIGlet is a program for making large letters out of ordinary text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300517.n5U5H55p013999@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489830 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks| |201449(FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #12 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-30 01:17:03 EDT --- More than 3 months without response. I will close his. Please feel free to reopen it after licensing is 'free' (free speech not free beer) enough for Fedora! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 06:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 02:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 491980] Review Request: bauble - Biodiversity collection manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300632.n5U6WlRE020680@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491980 Simon Wesp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|CANTFIX | --- Comment #10 from Simon Wesp 2009-06-30 02:32:45 EDT --- Pierre, I think I can do it with the new version 0.9.1 I will do an update in this week and post the links, of course. Let's see -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 07:37:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:37:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300737.n5U7bqJk002036@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|dhorak at redhat.com |dan at danny.cz Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 07:38:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:38:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300738.n5U7cW6p002194@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #10 from Richard Hughes 2009-06-30 03:38:31 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > At this point all I'd like to see is an ack from > legal that they're OK with this, and then I think we can go ahead. Great, thanks for the review. Do we need to poke legal, or do they find us? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 08:04:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:04:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] New: Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Summary: Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: bruno at wolff.to QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus.spec SRPM URL: http://wolff.to/bruno/colossus-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.src.rpm Description: This is my first package submission and I need a sponsor. This is an implementation of the game Titan. You can read more about the game at http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/103 . This is going to need a careful legal review. I suspect that at least the artwork for the original sets of legion markers will need to be replaced. Also the character counter artwork is similar enough to that of the original game, that in many cases it may need to be replaced as well. I can probably get some help from the upstream project with that and have some options for temporary solutions depending on what needs to get replaced. The artwork for the masterboard and battleboards has some functional components and is generally simplified in the computer implementation. I think it is likely that these are OK, but I am not an expert in this. Note for purposes of comparing the artwork, you need to look at the Avalon Hill edition, not the Valley Games edition which has all new artwork. The BGG site has a lot of pictures of the game, and I can provide hi res scans if needed for comparison. rpmlint output:bash-4.0$ rpmlint /home/bruno/rpmbuild/SRPMS/colossus-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.src.rpm /home/bruno/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/colossus-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.i586.rpm /home/bruno/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/colossus-javadoc-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.i586.rpm /home/bruno/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/colossus-debuginfo-20090629-1.4420svn.fc11.i586.rpm colossus.spec colossus.src: W: strange-permission colossus-gen-tarball.sh 0755 colossus.i586: E: no-binary colossus-debuginfo.i586: E: empty-debuginfo-package 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. bash-4.0$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 08:06:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:06:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508836] Review Request: colossus - computer implementation of Titan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300806.n5U86UAU009051@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508836 Bruno Wolff III changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 08:31:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:31:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300831.n5U8VkCj015289@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #5 from Jussi Lehtola 2009-06-30 04:31:44 EDT --- ping Christoph -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 08:58:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:58:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508849] New: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Summary: Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: yaneti at declera.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux.spec SRPM URL: http://declera.com/~yaneti/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux-0.02-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: This module implements the Bayeux Protocol (1.0draft1) from the Dojo Foundation. Also called cometd, Bayeux is a low-latency routing protocol for JSON encoded events between clients and servers in a publish- subscribe model. $ rpmlint mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux-0.02-1.fc12.*.rpm mock/fedora-10-i386/result/perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux-0.02-1.fc10.*.rpm 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:04:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:04:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300904.n5U94cIH030487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508031 --- Comment #1 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-30 05:04:37 EDT --- Some years ago I accidentially imported the Estonian dictionaries as hunspell-ee but ee is the language code for Ewe, so I'd like to fix this up and re-import this dictionary as hunspell-et and remove hunspell-ee as a dead.package to leave it free for a future Ewe hunspell-ee. So the above hunspell-et.spec Obsoletes/Provides the last version of hunspell-ee in Fedora on upgrade. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:01:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:01:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] New: Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Summary: Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: caolanm at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-et.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/rpms/hunspell-et-0.20030606-4.fc11.src.rpm Description: Estonian hunspell dictionaries -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:07:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:07:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507157] Review Request: efte - A lightweight, extendable, folding text editor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300907.n5U976SJ024366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507157 --- Comment #6 from Christoph Wickert 2009-06-30 05:07:04 EDT --- Sorry, I was on Linuxtag and FUDCon last week, so I didn't have time for this review. Will do it tonight. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:06:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:06:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 503590] Review Request: python-tgext-admin - Admin Controller add-on for basic TG identity model In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300906.n5U96DGN031419@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503590 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-30 05:06:12 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443362 looks ok but where can I find python-tgext-crud? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:07:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:07:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300907.n5U97FTR031543@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-30 05:07:14 EDT --- can you put correct SRPM URL please? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:10:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:10:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300910.n5U9AVZl025200@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |panemade at gmail.com AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |panemade at gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-30 05:10:29 EDT --- yes hunspell-et looks ok now for Estonian dictionaries. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:19:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:19:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508693] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto - Easy config file management for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300919.n5U9JerS027227@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508693 --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman 2009-06-30 05:19:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #1) > can you put correct SRPM URL please? /me signs. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto/perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ConfigAuto-1.30-1.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:36:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:36:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508691] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch - Dispatch requests to CGI::Application based objects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300936.n5U9aTIc007535@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508691 --- Comment #1 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-30 05:36:28 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443364 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 39e0fb1f9209fb82d8f086ba9165fcc1b8a7ebcc CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=2, Tests=28, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.02 usr 0.01 sys + 0.09 cusr 0.02 csys = 0.14 CPU) + Package perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-2.16-1.fc12.noarch => Provides: perl(CGI::Application::Dispatch) = 2.16 perl(CGI::Application::Dispatch::Regexp) = 2.13 Requires: perl(Carp) perl(Exception::Class) perl(Exception::Class::TryCatch) perl(base) perl(constant) perl(strict) perl(warnings) + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:42:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:42:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300942.n5U9gbNX000427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(????) 2009-06-30 05:42:35 EDT --- Review: + package builds in mock (rawhide i586). koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1443524 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url a633ab90e5e37981360143b5ee2b63bc62c4e0df ispell-et_20030606.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + Not a GUI application APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:41:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:41:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 190070] Review Request: par2cmdline In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300941.n5U9fIvE008540@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190070 Erik van Pienbroek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |erik-fedora at vanpienbroek.nl Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Erik van Pienbroek 2009-06-30 05:41:13 EDT --- As per bug 508772 the ownership of this package was transferred to me Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: par2cmdline New Branches: EL-5 Owners: epienbro konradm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:53:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:53:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507053] Review Request: latrace - glibc 2.4+ LD_AUDIT feature frontend In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300953.n5U9rwnI011441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507053 --- Comment #1 from Dan Hor?k 2009-06-30 05:53:57 EDT --- some notes - tool name shouldn't be repeated in summary (e.g. LD_AUDIT feature frontend for glibc 2.4+), but IMHO it should be description - license tag should be GPLv3+, because you have "GPLv3 or any later version" in the sources - s/dl/download/ in the URL tag (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL#Sourceforge.net) - at least bison, asciidoc and xmlto are missing in the BuildRequires - you should try building the package in mock to find all the BRs - run make with V=1 in %build, options passed to gcc must be visible - doesn't build in Rawhide, I get an error ... Note: Writing latrace.1 ASCIIDOC doc/latrace.html ERROR: unsafe: include file: /etc/asciidoc/./stylesheets/xhtml11.css ERROR: unsafe: include file: /etc/asciidoc/./stylesheets/xhtml11-manpage.css ERROR: unsafe: include file: /etc/asciidoc/./stylesheets/xhtml11-quirks.css make: *** [doc/latrace.html] Error 1 chyba: ?patn? n?vratov? k?d z /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.q7Pndh (%install) chyby sestaven? RPM: ... - 32-bit Intel platform should be encoded as "%{ix86}" in the ExclusiveArch tag and ARM in lowercase - don't mark the man page as %doc Increase the release in next published iteration of the package if the version remains the same. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 09:57:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508850] Review Request: hunspell-et - Estonian hunspell dictionaries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906300957.n5U9vSdn012660@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508850 Caolan McNamara changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Caolan McNamara 2009-06-30 05:57:27 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: hunspell-et Short Description: Estonian hunspell dictionaries Owners: caolanm Branches: devel InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 11:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 07:55:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501960] Review Request: webinject - Web/HTTP Test Tool In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301155.n5UBtCVt030635@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501960 --- Comment #6 from David Hannequin 2009-06-30 07:55:11 EDT --- Hi, I fixed desktop file. Spec URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject.spec SRPM URL: http://hvad.cfppa-cibeins.com/webinject/webinject-1.41-4.fc10.src.rpm Best regard -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 12:20:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:20:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 476471] Review Request: fedora-security-guide - A security guide for Linux In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301220.n5UCKjv5003778@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=476471 --- Comment #79 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-30 08:20:42 EDT --- Jens, Where are we now on this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 13:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301312.n5UDC3DA024780@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Rex Dieter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Alias| |liblastfm Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-30 09:12:01 EDT --- OK, I'll take a look at remaining items 1. spec whitespace 2. BuildRequires ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 13:19:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:19:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301319.n5UDJX5Z026206@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-30 09:19:32 EDT --- Spec URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm.spec SRPM URL: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm-0.2.1-2.fc11.src.rpm %changelog * Tue Jun 30 2009 ... - rpmlint clean(er) - BR: libsamplerate-devel - -devel: fix Requires (typo, +%%?_isa} -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 13:52:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:52:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301352.n5UDqMfH002151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #9 from Colin Walters 2009-06-30 09:52:19 EDT --- I've updated CVS. Working on a mock test build now, but feel free to jujmp in and make any changes necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 14:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301414.n5UEEi2O032010@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 Eelko Berkenpies changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 14:14:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301414.n5UEESrR031937@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #5 from Eelko Berkenpies 2009-06-30 10:14:26 EDT --- [V] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. The output should be posted in the review. [eelko at eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/SRPMS/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm liblastfm.src:41: W: configure-without-libdir-spec 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [eelko at eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [eelko at eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-devel-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-dependency-on liblastfm/liblastfm-libs/libliblastfm liblastfm-devel.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [eelko at eb SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/eelko/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/liblastfm-debuginfo-0.3.0-2.fc11.i586.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [V] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense. Conclusion: ------------------ APPROVED ------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 14:43:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:43:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508922] New: Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508922 Summary: Review Request: scselinux - GUI Code for system-config-selinux, polgen, and lockdown Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: cpardy at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~cpardy/rpms/scselinux.spec SRPM URL: http://users.wpi.edu/~cpardy/rpms/scselinux-0-0.1a.src.rpm Description: To better conform with the upstream the gui code that was previously in policycoreutils has been moved into it's own package and given a rewrite to use policy kit. This code implements the 3 guis, system-config-selinux polgengui and lockdown. These have in the past been implemented as a patch on fedora systems to the policycoreutils package. This code is not yet feature complete and does not yet have an upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 14:46:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:46:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301446.n5UEk4Qt015575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-06-30 10:46:02 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, thank you very much for the review. (In reply to comment #4) > These days %global seems to be preferred over %define, though the differences > are subtle and I don't think it makes any particular difference for the two > %defines you're using. Ok, let it be %global. > > I think your Source0 should not be a URL if that URL is not valid, such as in > the case where you're using a CVS snapshot. Fixed. > > I'm not sure why you'd need "PECL:" in the Summary; the upstream site doesn't > use that in its summary, and it gives the impression that the name of the > package is "PECL". Ok, "PECL" prefix removed. > > Your BuildRoot: tag is missing any mention of %release. One day soon BuildRoot > can go away, but that's not quite here yet and in the meantime it needs to meet > the guidelines. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag Added %%release part into BuildRoot tag. http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora10/php-pecl-parsekit/php-pecl-parsekit-1.2-3.CVS20090309.fc9.src.rpm http://hubbitus.net.ru/rpm/Fedora10/php-pecl-parsekit/php-pecl-parsekit.spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 14:55:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 10:55:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301455.n5UEtIih018394@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |pahan at hubbitus.info AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |pahan at hubbitus.info Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-06-30 10:55:17 EDT --- I have been promised many times ago review you Java package. I plan do it now :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 15:19:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:19:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 469460] review request: gir-repository - GObject Introspection Repository In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301519.n5UFJg8o019971@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469460 --- Comment #10 from Peter Robinson 2009-06-30 11:19:39 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I've updated CVS. Working on a mock test build now, but feel free to jujmp in > and make any changes necessary. I'll have a look tonight if you don't have time. I was in process of getting them both on 0.6.3 (inc gobject-introspection) earlier but other things have taken my time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 15:24:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:24:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 490892] Review Request: b43-openfwwf - Open FirmWare for Broadcom 43xx series WLAN chip In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301524.n5UFOaJk027501@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490892 --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 11:24:35 EDT --- Legal has been poked, via Blocks: FE-Legal above. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 15:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508523] Review Request: miredo - Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301521.n5UFLxoj026987@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508523 Jens Kuehnel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jens Kuehnel 2009-06-30 11:21:57 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: miredo Short Description: Tunneling of IPv6 over UDP through NATs Owners: jens Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 15:28:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:28:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507830] Review Request: camorama - Gnome webcam viewer In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301528.n5UFSlhU023118@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507830 Mauro Carvalho Chehab changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mchehab at redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Mauro Carvalho Chehab 2009-06-30 11:28:46 EDT --- Tested here. It properly works. It would be interesting to add it also at rpmfusion and/or at epel, for usage with RHEL5. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 15:31:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:31:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508452] Review Request: rubygem-bacon - A ruby-based testing framework In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301531.n5UFVp4q023959@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508452 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-30 11:31:50 EDT --- -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (rubygem-bacon) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 15:35:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:35:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 497194] Review Request: liblastfm - Libraries to integrate Last.fm services In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301535.n5UFZFxh030420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=497194 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter 2009-06-30 11:35:14 EDT --- For posterity, srpm link that works: http://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/pkg-reviews/liblastfm/liblastfm-0.3.0-2.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504474] Review Request: rubygem-rack-test - Simple testing API built on Rack In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301601.n5UG1UkN003934@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504474 --- Comment #5 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-30 12:01:29 EDT --- Well, - I have overlooked it, however it seems this package should have "Requires: rubygem(rack)" because lib/rack/test.rb contains: -------------------------------------------------------------- 5 require "uri" 6 require "rack" -------------------------------------------------------------- (although Rakefile does not suggest such dependency). Would you check this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:11:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:11:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301611.n5UGBo6G002551@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-06-30 12:11:49 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=349969) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=349969) rpmlint output -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:11:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:11:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301611.n5UGBnt9002518@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #4 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-06-30 12:11:47 EDT --- Here is the review: +:ok, =:needs attention, -:needs fixing MUST Items: [+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. rpmlint silent [+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name} [=] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the Licensing Guidelines. # src/SevenZip is LGPLv2+ or CPL # The rest is GPLv2+ License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ or CPL) but changelog says what SevenZip now not included. So, I think license shoild be GPLv2+ now only. [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license. Package include dreamfabric Dknob component http://www.dreamfabric.com/java/knob/knob.html this is not mention any license in sourse. License text also not included. Did you contact with author and ask license? Also petersalomonsen component included. License there same GPLv2+, but it is not acceptable bundle any (source or compiled JARs) components in package: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software all such components must be separate packaged and reviewed. [+] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc. [+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English. [+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. No. Package contains script to fetch source from SVN (frinika-snapshot.sh), but it revision number not provided. And you should add comment how you get source. In you case it may be simple note about proper usage of frinika-snapshot.sh. It must be command to copy/paste reproduce. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control One hint, instead of do "svn checkout" ("svn co") and then delete .svn directory, you may do just "svn export" Also other sources must have comment where it placed. Please refer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source whan link is not accesable. [+] MUST: The package must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at least one supported architecture. Build successful - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444150 [+] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. This is noarch package. [-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires BuildRequires: ant missing. You provide ant into build-jar-repository, so, its needed. [+] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the %find_lang macro. Package does not have locale files. [+] MUST: Every binary RPM package which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. No shared library files here. [+] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review I think package is not relocatable. [+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that directory. [+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing. [+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with executable permissions, for example. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line. [+] MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines. [+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissible content. This is described in detail in the code vs. content section of Packaging Guidelines. [=] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage. There only may be considered move examples into separate subpackage. But its have small size, and I do not require it. [+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application. [+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package. No header files, this is java package [+] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package. No static libraries. [+] MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). No such files. [+] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. No libraries. [+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} Devel package absent. [+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec. [+] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. [+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages. [+] MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). [+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8. SHOULD Items: [+] SHOULD: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. COPYING file included. [=] SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. Built in koji http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444150 [=] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. Error: Missing Dependency: SevenZip is needed by package frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch (/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch) Error: Missing Dependency: tootaudioservers >= 3 is needed by package frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch (/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch) This dependencies is only in rawhide? [+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane. [+] SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. [+] SHOULD: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files depends on their usecase, and this is usually for development purposes, so should be placed in a -devel pkg. A reasonable exception is that the main pkg itself is a devel tool not installed in a user runtime, e.g. gcc or gdb. [+] SHOULD: If the package has file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin consider requiring the package which provides the file instead of the file itself. [+] SHOULD: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. Additionals: Must: [-] Patches. Each included patch must have link to upstream bagtracker or comment why it can't be done. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus Should: [=] I think in command: ln -s %{_libdir}/flexdock/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lib/flexdock.jar || \ Will be cool replace "0.5.1" by something like %{version} Please correct these issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:11:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:11:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301611.n5UGB6RU002369@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #2 from Ian Weller 2009-06-30 12:11:05 EDT --- Source URL: Please read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net for dealing with Source0's URL properly. (Note you can't use %{name}-%{version}.whatever because the package is WHOAAAAAcompletely different.) Macros: Those look like the Zikula-specific macros at the top and in reality they aren't really helping all that much. One is redundant, and it would be much cleaner in the specfile to just type out "limesurvey" and %{_datadir} so people don't get lost. (On the same note, having files under /usr/share/limesurvey/limesurvey seems mildly redundant and probably shouldn't be done.) Requires: Are you supposed to require a webserver? Check with somebody on that and paste the IRC log (or whatever) here. rpmlint: is very loud. Output will be attached. The gist of it is "file-not-in-%lang" warnings; take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:12:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:12:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] New: Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Summary: Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: mitr at redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Target Release: --- Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/volume_key.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/volume_key-0.2-1.src.rpm Description: This package provides a command-line tool for manipulating storage volume encryption keys and storing them separately from volumes. The main goal of the software is to allow restoring access to an encrypted hard drive if the primary user forgets the passphrase. The encryption key back up can also be useful for extracting data after a hardware or software failure that corrupts the header of the encrypted volume, or to access the company data after an employee leaves abruptly. Note: the package builds against a static, patched copy of libcryptsetup. This is temporary, to make volume_key available in Fedora sooner. The upstream maintainer has accepted the proposed functionality, and I'll remove the static copy of libcryptsetup as soon as the patch is not necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:13:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:13:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301613.n5UGDobs003275@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 Ian Weller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |ian at ianweller.org Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Ian Weller 2009-06-30 12:13:49 EDT --- Hey, now that you are sponsored, I guess I'll take this. :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:18:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:18:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505982] Review Request: zikula-module-MultiHook - MultiHook is a simple replacement for the old AutoLinks module for Zikula In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301618.n5UGI6e4004460@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505982 --- Comment #4 from Ian Weller 2009-06-30 12:18:05 EDT --- [ianweller at deathray review]$ rpmlint /home/ianweller/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0-2.fc11.noarch.rpm zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/license.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/install.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/needles_howto.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/credits.txt zikula-module-MultiHook.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/zikula-module-MultiHook-5.0/changelog.txt 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. please fix :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:22:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:22:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301622.n5UGMQDo005637@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |php-pear-Auth-HTTP - Class |php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class |providing HTTP |providing HTTP |authentication methods |authentication methods Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-30 12:22:25 EDT --- Okay -------------------------------------------------------------- This package (php-pear-Auth_HTTP) is APPROVED by mtasaka -------------------------------------------------------------- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:30:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:30:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508082] Review Request: php-pear-Auth_HTTP - Class providing HTTP authentication methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301630.n5UGUYKo008133@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508082 Andrew Colin Kissa changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-30 12:30:33 EDT --- Thanks for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pear-Auth_HTTP Short Description: Class providing HTTP authentication methods Owners: topdog Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: mtasaka -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:39:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:39:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301639.n5UGdUqC012757@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Miloslav Trma? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |508960(volume-key-escrow) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 16:51:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 12:51:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301651.n5UGpOEX012736@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #5 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-30 12:51:23 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Here is the review: > Whee! Thanks a lot! > [=] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet > the Licensing Guidelines. > # src/SevenZip is LGPLv2+ or CPL > # The rest is GPLv2+ > License: GPLv2+ and (LGPLv2+ or CPL) > but changelog says what SevenZip now not included. So, I think license shoild > be GPLv2+ now only. Ouch, I forgot to update the license tag after I packaged SevenZip separately. > [-] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual > license. > Package include dreamfabric Dknob component > http://www.dreamfabric.com/java/knob/knob.html this is not mention any license > in sourse. License text also not included. Did you contact with author and ask > license? > > Also petersalomonsen component included. License there same GPLv2+, but it is > not acceptable bundle any (source or compiled JARs) components in package: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Pre-built_JAR_files_.2F_Other_bundled_software > > all such components must be separate packaged and reviewed. > It looks like I missed these ones. I'll do them next. > [-] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream > source, as provided in the spec URL. > > No. > Package contains script to fetch source from SVN (frinika-snapshot.sh), but it > revision number not provided. And you should add comment how you get source. > In you case it may be simple note about proper usage of frinika-snapshot.sh. > It must be command to copy/paste reproduce. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control > > One hint, instead of do "svn checkout" ("svn co") and then delete .svn > directory, you may do just "svn export" > Actually the revision number is provided: I issue "svnversion" between "svn checkout" and "delete .svn directories" to get the svn revision number. How can I do this with "svn export"? > Also other sources must have comment where it placed. Please refer to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source whan > link is not accesable. > Other sources? I didn't get your point. %{name}.sh, %{name}.desktop, %{name}-snapshot.sh are all written by me. > [-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires > BuildRequires: ant > missing. You provide ant into build-jar-repository, so, its needed. Strange that I missed this. > [=] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package functions as described. > Error: Missing Dependency: SevenZip is needed by package > frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch (/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch) > Error: Missing Dependency: tootaudioservers >= 3 is needed by package > frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch (/frinika-0.5.1-3.521svn.fc11.noarch) > > This dependencies is only in rawhide? > They are also submitted to stable. They will arrive there in a few days. > [-] Patches. Each included patch must have link to upstream bagtracker or > comment why it can't be done. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus The patches are all strictly Fedora specific. I'll add a comment. > Should: > [=] I think in command: > ln -s %{_libdir}/flexdock/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lib/flexdock.jar || \ > Will be cool replace "0.5.1" by something like %{version} > That 0.5.1 is flexdock's version, not frinika's. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 17:16:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:16:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML-Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301716.n5UHGoou018452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #3 from Mamoru Tasaka 2009-06-30 13:16:49 EDT --- For -2: * Directory ownership issue - Well, I don't know well which package should own the directory %{pear_phpdir}/HTML/. * -1 binary rpm owned this directory * now -2 binary rpm does not own this directory * On dist-f12 tree only "php-pear-HTML-Common" binary rpm owns this directory, however currently this rpm (php-pear-HTML_Javascript) does not depend on php-pear-HTML-Common So two solutions. Either: - make php-pear-HTML_Javascript depend on (i.e Requires) php-pear(HTML_Common) - or make php-pear-HTML_Javascript also own %{pear_phpdir}/HTML/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 17:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:17:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301717.n5UHH70i018498@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 Mamoru Tasaka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |php-pear-HTML-Javascript - |php-pear-HTML_Javascript - |Class for creating simple |Class for creating simple |JS scripts |JS scripts -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 17:53:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:53:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508817] Review Request: Limesurvey - An open source survey application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301753.n5UHrWNK031710@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508817 --- Comment #4 from Eric Christensen 2009-06-30 13:53:31 EDT --- Note to self... 1. Remove mysql-server from Requires 2. Add webserver to Requires 3. Package in F11 as the rpmlint in CentOS 5.3 isn't catching everything, apparently. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 18:44:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:44:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501251] Review Request: perl-Tk-Stderr - Capture standard error output, display in separate window for Perl::Tk In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301844.n5UIiMwb008510@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501251 --- Comment #15 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-30 14:44:21 EDT --- Where are the updates in bodhi? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 18:47:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:47:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301847.n5UIlCIK009356@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 --- Comment #13 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-30 14:47:11 EDT --- I want to poke the submitter of this package, that this review is APPROVEd. So he should create the CVSAdmin request for inclussion of this package into Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 18:50:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:50:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301850.n5UIodOA014139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 14:50:37 EDT --- Looks good to me, thanks. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 18:54:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:54:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301854.n5UIsAkL010702@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-30 14:54:09 EDT --- Question: If you have talk to the Fedora maintainer of libcryptsetup. Because that this is a patch which should included into ghe general version of libcryptsetup, I would suggest, that we should add this patch into the Fedora package of libcryptsetup until this patch will been integrated into the upstream package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 18:57:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 14:57:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507915] Review Request: ldd3-pdf - Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301857.n5UIvdob015853@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507915 steve changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from steve 2009-06-30 14:57:38 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: ldd-pdf Short Description: Linux Device Drivers, Third Edition Book in PDF format Owners: lonetwin Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:03:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:03:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301903.n5UJ3cYL017487@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #2 from Miloslav Trma? 2009-06-30 15:03:37 EDT --- Milan Broz is actually Cc: ed. I prefer to keep the patch inside volume_key, because it adds new interfaces to the library. If the Fedora cryptsetup package is patched, other users might mistakenly think these interfaces were accepted upstream, and might release code that "depends on libcryptsetup" that actually compiles only against the Fedora version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:11:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:11:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301911.n5UJBCYa014888@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Peter Lemenkov changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Peter Lemenkov 2009-06-30 15:11:10 EDT --- Ok, all issues were fixed. This package is APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:18:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:18:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301918.n5UJIhrC016412@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 --- Comment #3 from Milan Broz 2009-06-30 15:18:42 EDT --- Library extensions are planned to be included in uspstream cryptsetup but not in current 1.0.x stable branch (I expect it in cryptsetup 1.1, but discussion still ongoing). All library extensions must be checked in upstream first, with proper library version increase. I think that for the testing there is no problem with local static library, everything written to disk (LUKS header) is still fully compatible with unpatched cryptsetup). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:27:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:27:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301927.n5UJRZVv018907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-06-30 15:27:34 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sK1 Short Description: illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:26:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:26:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508849] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301926.n5UJQrfE018705@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |jochen at herr-schmitt.de Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-30 15:26:52 EDT --- Good: + Basename of SPEC files matches with package name + Package name fullfill naming guidelines + URL tag shows on proper project homepage + Could download upstream sources via spectool -g + Package source tar ball matches with upstream (md5sum: dd18ab3f61f390fbc96a8dc8a15aa447) * Package has proper License tag + License Tag says GPLv2 and Artistic as OSS license * Copyright note in the source files matches with license tag + Package has proper Buildroot definition + Consistently usage of rpm macros + Proper Buildroot definition + BuidRoot will be clean at the beginning of %clean and %install + Package will be built for noarch * Local build works fine + Package has a %check stanza + Rpmlint is quite for source rpm + rpmlint is quite for binary rpm + Scratch build on koji works fine + Local install and uninstall works fine + %doc stanza is small, no extra subpackage in required + Files has proper files permission + %files contains no duplicated entries + All packaged files are owned by this package + No packaged files belong to another package + package has proper Changelog Bad: - Package doesn't contains verbain copy of the license (no blocker) ** APPROVED ** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:30:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:30:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301930.n5UJUN3N020238@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #6 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-06-30 15:30:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > Actually the revision number is provided: > I issue "svnversion" between "svn checkout" and "delete .svn directories" to > get the svn revision number. How can I do this with "svn export"? No. To check source I run: $ sh frinika-snapshot.sh and got frinika-548.tar.bz2 tarball opposite your frinika-521.tar.bz2. So, my suggestion here to take in that script at least one argument - revision number, and checkout exactly provided revithion. Then, in spec file comment near this source you write instruction like: # ./frinika-snapshot.sh 521 or, on you choice: # ./%{name}-snapshot.sh %{svnver} Example how I think about it (both revision number as parameter, and "svn export" here) - http://hubbitus.fedorapeople.org/frinika-snapshot.sh Hope if it help. And off course I do not insist on exactly that implementation. > > Also other sources must have comment where it placed. Please refer to > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Referencing_Source whan > > link is not accesable. > Other sources? I didn't get your point. %{name}.sh, %{name}.desktop, > %{name}-snapshot.sh are all written by me. Excelent! And add this two words into comment. > > [-] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires > > BuildRequires: ant > > missing. You provide ant into build-jar-repository, so, its needed. > Strange that I missed this. See buld log: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=1444151&name=build.log Straight sfter invoke: $ build-jar-repository -s -p lib toot2 jmod jVorbisEnc jgoodies-looks jakarta-commons-logging skinlf SevenZip next command from it is: $ ant jar javadocs > > This dependencies is only in rawhide? > They are also submitted to stable. They will arrive there in a few days. Good. I think I can test it shorly. (I test it on work notebook, and afraid use rawhide here. Sorry.) > > [-] Patches. Each included patch must have link to upstream bagtracker or > > comment why it can't be done. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/PatchUpstreamStatus > The patches are all strictly Fedora specific. I'll add a comment. Really all Fedora related? I think frinika-sevenzip.patch fix real bug. Why you do not wish fill it upstream? > > Should: > > [=] I think in command: > > ln -s %{_libdir}/flexdock/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lib/flexdock.jar || \ > > Will be cool replace "0.5.1" by something like %{version} > That 0.5.1 is flexdock's version, not frinika's. Really. My mistake. But it is also error. You use unversioned BuildRequires: flexdock Requires: flexdock but symlink to exact version of jar. >From this I look again on this symlinks. I think instad of doing such symlink you should use build-classpath: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-classpath -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:35:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:35:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301935.n5UJZrPP025776@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 Jochen Schmitt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jochen at herr-schmitt.de --- Comment #2 from Jochen Schmitt 2009-06-30 15:35:52 EDT --- It may be nice, if you can update to the most current 0.11.2 release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 19:50:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:50:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508750] Review Request: trash-cli - Command line interface to the freedesktop.org trashcan In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906301950.n5UJoZLN028774@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508750 --- Comment #3 from Rahul Sundaram 2009-06-30 15:50:34 EDT --- The version I packaged was the only listed as the "featured download". I have dropped a mail to the primary upstream developer asking for clarification. Meanwhile, if you can do a review, I can import and update later even. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 20:01:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 455227] Review Request: php-pecl-parsekit - PHP Opcode Analyser In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302001.n5UK11gC030933@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=455227 Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) 2009-06-30 16:01:00 EDT --- Jason Tibbitts, thank you for the review. New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: php-pecl-parsekit Short Description: PHP Opcode Analyser Owners: Hubbitus Branches: F-10 F-11 EL-5 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 20:17:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:17:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302017.n5UKHTN2002496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 Louis Lagendijk changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |louis at lagendijk.xs4all.nl --- Comment #13 from Louis Lagendijk 2009-06-30 16:17:28 EDT --- Please check if the description is ok. I believe that using registered trade names is not allowed...... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 20:22:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:22:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502926] Review Request: sk1 - illustration program similar to corel draw or adobe illustrator In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302022.n5UKMiIH000537@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502926 --- Comment #14 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-06-30 16:22:42 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: sK1 Short Description: open-source illustration program Owners: itamarjp Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 20:23:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:23:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508075] Review Request: php-pear-HTML_Javascript - Class for creating simple JS scripts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302023.n5UKNVI8000901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508075 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Colin Kissa 2009-06-30 16:23:30 EDT --- I have gone with adding a dependency on php-pear-HTML-Common, Updated Spec and SRPM SPECS: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML_Javascript.spec SRPMS: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/php-pear-HTML-Javascript/php-pear-HTML_Javascript-1.1.1-3.fc11.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:06:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:06:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302106.n5UL6s8V012781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 --- Comment #6 from Chris Cowley 2009-06-30 17:06:53 EDT --- Mat That sounds like a fair deal to me :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:11:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:11:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Review Request: eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP plugin for Eclipse In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302111.n5ULBdnL018098@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Chris Cowley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|Package Review |eclipse-phpeclipse Version|rawhide |el5 Product|Fedora |Fedora EPEL -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:11:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:11:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506339] Review Request: XZ Utils - LZMA Utils with newer file format In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302111.n5ULBHGf018019@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506339 --- Comment #13 from Milos Jakubicek 2009-06-30 17:11:14 EDT --- Orcan, I'm really sorry for my late response, but I'm having busy days now (and yes, I must have missed whatever you sent to f-d-l, sorry too). I'm generally open to any modification to the current lzma package which will help the symbiosis with xz, however, I really like the latest solution from Jindrich (only -debuginfo are conflicting, which I don't find any bad) and if nobody comes up with something we missed as far, I'm going to approve the package in a day or two. Other minor comments on packaging: * rpmlint: >rpmlint ../SRPMS/xz-4.999.8-0.5beta.fc11.src.rpm xz.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary XZ 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. >rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/xz-* xz-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation xz-lzma-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/lzcat xz xz-lzma-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/unlzma xz xz-lzma-compat.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/bin/lzma xz xz.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary XZ Those are all OK imho. xz.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4.999.8beta-0.5 ['4.999.8-0.5beta.fc11', '4.999.8-0.5beta'] Make rpmlint happy here please, together with adding a dot as Orcan pointed out. * specfile is sane, owns all directories, proper macros * builds fine in current F11 and rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1444933 * matches upstream sources, sha256sum: 059da5a9fe51c28b38f67e5b8063a451c516f37fbb268177fd1081b70dd97f53 * handles libraries well * I have some worries regarding licensing because of the comment on upstream's homepage: "Oops! Accidentally a wrong COPYING file got included in 4.999.8beta. 4.999.8beta is still under GNU LGPL, but the first stable release will be in the public domain like the incorrectly included draft of new COPYING in 4.999.8beta already hints." Currently it is definitely *not* LGPLv2.1+ (in this case) but I'm also afraid that authors claims about becoming Public domain are not right too. Hence GPLv2+ seems to be ok to me (now). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:18:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:18:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508849] Review Request: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux - Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302118.n5ULILep019839@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508849 Yanko Kaneti changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Yanko Kaneti 2009-06-30 17:18:20 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-POE-Component-Server-Bayeux Short Description: Bayeux/cometd server implementation in POE Owners: yaneti Branches: F-10 F-11 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:22:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:22:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302122.n5ULMjFo017108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:22:44 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup-1.01-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:21:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:21:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302121.n5ULLj6G016804@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:21:45 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:22:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:22:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302122.n5ULM4Xn016914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |4.65-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:22:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302122.n5ULMwSR017197@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:22:57 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode-0.16-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:21:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:21:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302121.n5ULLoxC016842@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |1.0-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:22:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:22:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506971] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DevPopup - Runtime cgiapp info in a popup window In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302122.n5ULMoKH017150@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506971 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.01-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:24:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302124.n5ULO5wf021552@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:24:04 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:21:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:21:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302121.n5ULLx1S020995@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:21:58 EDT --- SevenZip-4.65-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:25:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302125.n5ULP0fj021793@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:24:59 EDT --- mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:23:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:23:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302123.n5ULNsY3021504@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:23:53 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect-1.00-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:23:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:23:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506887] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-AutoRunmode - CGI::App plugin to automatically register runmodes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302123.n5ULN391021304@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506887 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.16-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:24:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:24:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302124.n5ULOGkO021606@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:24:15 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-flipsticks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7068 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:26:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302126.n5ULQRHt018794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:26:26 EDT --- tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:26:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302126.n5ULQ8b2018738@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:26:07 EDT --- bullet-2.74-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:27:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:27:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302127.n5ULR2UN018889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:27:01 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session-1.03-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:25:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302125.n5ULP4fZ018293@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |45462-1.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:24:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:24:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302124.n5ULOAxx017734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:25:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302125.n5ULPl1l018616@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.7.2-4.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:24:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508630] Build eclipse-phpeclipse for EPEL In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302124.n5ULOWqk017826@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508630 Mat Booth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|fedora at matbooth.co.uk | AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |fedora at matbooth.co.uk Summary|Review Request: |Build eclipse-phpeclipse |eclipse-PHPEclipse - PHP |for EPEL |plugin for Eclipse | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:23:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:23:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506976] Review Request:perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Redirect - Easy external redirects in CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302123.n5ULNwdQ017687@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506976 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.00-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:25:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302125.n5ULPwhX018668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:25:57 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qelectrotech'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7079 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:25:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302125.n5ULPhQg022568@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:25:42 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:29:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:29:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302129.n5ULTQ1h023753@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:29:25 EDT --- tootaudioservers-3-0.1.beta2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:28:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:28:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302128.n5ULSdqE023575@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:28:37 EDT --- perl-TheSchwartz-1.07-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:26:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302126.n5ULQVle022835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |3-0.1.beta2.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:27:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:27:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507060] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Session - Add CGI::Session support to CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302127.n5ULR6cb022954@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507060 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.03-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:26:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:26:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302126.n5ULQD9P022758@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.74-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:28:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:28:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506187] Review Request: perl-TheSchwartz - Reliable job queue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302128.n5ULSiKG023614@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506187 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.07-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:28:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:28:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302128.n5ULSVNW023511@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #58 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:28:24 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update blueman'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7096 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:32:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:32:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302132.n5ULW2RV020958@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:32:01 EDT --- perl-p5-Palm-1.009-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:29:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:29:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492201] Review Request: tootaudioservers - Toot2 Audio Server In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302129.n5ULTVju019856@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492201 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|3-0.1.beta2.fc10 |3-0.1.beta2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:30:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:30:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302130.n5ULU9bq020346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:30:08 EDT --- bullet-2.74-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVdDM020830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:31:38 EDT --- libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:30:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:30:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507972] Review Request: bullet - 3D Collision Detection and Rigid Body Dynamics Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302130.n5ULUEas020462@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507972 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|2.74-1.fc11 |2.74-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:29:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:29:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302129.n5ULTbuJ019890@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:29:36 EDT --- mediawiki-HTTP302Found-1.0-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:29:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:29:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507082] Review Request: mediawiki-HTTP302Found - Forces an external HTTP 302 redirect instead of internal redirects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302129.n5ULTfCV019921@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507082 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0-1.fc10 |1.0-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:32:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506186] Review Request: perl-p5-Palm - Palm OS utility functions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302132.n5ULW6jp020996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506186 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.009-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVsKY020924@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |20070624-3.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVh8I020874@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.1-2.fc10 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:30:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:30:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302130.n5ULUVkl020534@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.10-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 492203] Review Request: frinika - Music Workstation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULV8Px020679@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492203 --- Comment #7 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil 2009-06-30 17:31:06 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Example how I think about it (both revision number as parameter, and "svn > export" here) - http://hubbitus.fedorapeople.org/frinika-snapshot.sh > > Hope if it help. And off course I do not insist on exactly that > implementation. > Okay, I used your script and I also made an option to do $ sh frinika-snapshot.sh latest to get the latest sources (which is nice when doing updates) > $ ant jar javadocs > I noticed that ant is pulled by other BR's. But I added it anyways. > > The patches are all strictly Fedora specific. I'll add a comment. > Really all Fedora related? I think frinika-sevenzip.patch fix real bug. Why > you do not wish fill it upstream? > The patch is not needed for the SevenZip that is in the frinika tarball. It is specific for the SevenZip we have in Fedora. > > > > Should: > > > [=] I think in command: > > > ln -s %{_libdir}/flexdock/flexdock-0.5.1.jar lib/flexdock.jar || \ > > > Will be cool replace "0.5.1" by something like %{version} > > That 0.5.1 is flexdock's version, not frinika's. > Really. My mistake. But it is also error. You use unversioned > BuildRequires: flexdock > Requires: flexdock > but symlink to exact version of jar. > This was a flexdock packaging bug (bug #464781 comment #45). The unversioned jar symlink was not available (in all repos) when I first packaged frinika. But I see that it is fixed in all repos now. So I removed my workaround. > From this I look again on this symlinks. I think instead of doing such symlink > you should use build-classpath: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#build-classpath build-classpath only works for jar files that go to %{_javadir}. As indicated in http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java#Guideline the JNI using jar files go to %{_libdir}/%{name} and build-classpath will not work on them. They need to be added manually. I updated the package (also fixed the other issues you pointed): Spec URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika.spec SRPM URL: http://oget.fedorapeople.org/review/frinika-0.5.1-4.548svn.fc11.src.rpm ChangeLog: 0.5.1-4.548svn - Update to svn revision 548 - License is GPLv2+ - Add BR: ant - Add more comments on sources & patches - Make the snapshot script nicer (thanks to Pavel Alexeev) - Remove flexdock versioned symlink workaround - Remove some unneeded sources So, I removed the Dknob sources from src/com/dreamfabric/ . As far as I can tell, they are not used by frinika. I think the only remaining issues are these additional sources. I asked about them (Dknob and others) upstream https://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?thread_id=3319021&forum_id=447356 They usually respond fast. Let us wait and see what will come out. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:30:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:30:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507061] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream - CGI::Application Plugin for streaming files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302130.n5ULURg4024646@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507061 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:30:26 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-Stream-2.10-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507501] Review Request: inkboy-fonts - a simple clean latin font In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVnro025103@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507501 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:31:49 EDT --- inkboy-fonts-20070624-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:34:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:34:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302134.n5ULYRAC025630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:34:26 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage-1.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508954] Review Request: volume_key - An utility for manipulating storage encryption keys and passphrases In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302133.n5ULXpON025526@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508954 Tomas Mraz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |tmraz at redhat.com Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:31:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:31:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302131.n5ULVF8q024967@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com --- Comment #3 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-06-30 17:31:14 EDT --- Made the above mentioned changes. Changed the license to CPL since the README mentioned this is code is distributed under CPL. The final versions of the files can be found at: http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-indication_helper/sblim-indication_helper-0.4.2-1.fc10.src.rpm http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/sblim-indication_helper/sblim-indication_helper.spec Please review the above files. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:32:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:32:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302132.n5ULWlMP025269@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:32:46 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-infoslicer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-7129 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302133.n5ULXTfo021882@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:33:28 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302133.n5ULXpMN021993@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:33:50 EDT --- tuxmath-1.7.2-4.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:35:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:35:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302135.n5ULZO7k022917@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc11 |1.1-2.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:33:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 501223] Review Request: tuxmath - Educational math tutor for children In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302133.n5ULXuhn022042@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=501223 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.7.2-4.fc10 |1.7.2-4.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:35:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:35:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302135.n5ULZsB5023046@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.5-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:34:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:34:31 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506670] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-ErrorPage - Simple error page plugin for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302134.n5ULYVUw022214@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506670 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.20-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:33:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302133.n5ULXY6K021918@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.1-2.fc10 |1.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:34:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:34:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 505867] Review Request: qelectrotech - Design electric diagrams In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302134.n5ULY5kU022101@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505867 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:34:04 EDT --- qelectrotech-0.20-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update qelectrotech'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7132 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508437] Review Request: sugar-flipsticks - A keyframe animation activity for Sugar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302136.n5ULa4QN023087@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508437 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:36:03 EDT --- sugar-flipsticks-2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-flipsticks'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7148 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:33:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:33:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 466183] Review Request: sblim-sfcb - Small Footprint CIM Broker In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302133.n5ULXpHZ022009@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466183 Praveen K Paladugu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |praveen_paladugu at dell.com --- Comment #11 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-06-30 17:33:48 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > Spec URL: http://sblim.sourceforge.net/fedora-rpms/sblim-sfcb.spec > SRPM URL: http://sblim.sourceforge.net/fedora-rpms/sblim-sfcb-1.3.2-1.src.rpm > Description: Small Footprint CIM Broker (sfcb) is a CIM server conforming to > the > CIM Operations over HTTP protocol. It is robust, with low resource consumption > and therefore specifically suited for embedded and resource constrained > environments. sfcb supports providers written against the Common Manageability > Programming Interface (CMPI). Hi Emily, The above links are not working. Could you please check them and provide working links. Thank you Praveen K Paladugu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:38:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:38:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302138.n5ULc43E027000@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:38:03 EDT --- SevenZip-4.65-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:38:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:38:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504521] Review Request: SevenZip - Java SDK for LZMA In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302138.n5ULc93u027042@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504521 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|4.65-1.fc10 |4.65-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:35:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:35:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 498721] Review Request: php-ezc-Webdav - eZ Components Webdav In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302135.n5ULZJI5026366@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498721 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:35:18 EDT --- php-ezc-Webdav-1.1-2.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:35:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:35:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302135.n5ULZXK1026420@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:35:32 EDT --- pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:35:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:35:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507771] Review Request: python-ctags - A python wrapper to read tags library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302135.n5ULZoLg026516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507771 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:35:49 EDT --- python-ctags-1.0.5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:37:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:37:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302137.n5ULbvN0026949@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|1.0.1-2.fc10 |1.0.1-2.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:37:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:37:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 499579] Review Request: libxdg-basedir - Implementation of the XDG Base Directory Specifications In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302137.n5ULbnb7026908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499579 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:37:48 EDT --- libxdg-basedir-1.0.1-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:35:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:35:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302135.n5ULZcSx026463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.7.0-2.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:43:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302143.n5ULh2qX025383@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:43:01 EDT --- perl-Sub-WrapPackages-1.2-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:42:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:42:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302142.n5ULgolV025337@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:42:49 EDT --- perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp-0.05-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:38:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:38:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302138.n5ULcpka023901@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:38:50 EDT --- mediawiki-CategoryTree-45462-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506198] Review Request: mediawiki-CategoryTree - Provides a dynamic view of the wiki's category structure as a tree In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302138.n5ULctiI023942@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506198 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|45462-1.fc10 |45462-1.fc11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:44:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:44:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 468329] Review Request: sblim-indication_helper - Toolkit for CMPI Indication Providers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302144.n5ULiFFq029630@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=468329 --- Comment #4 from Praveen K Paladugu 2009-06-30 17:44:14 EDT --- The output of rpmlint: [user]# rpmlint sblim-indication_helper.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:41:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302141.n5ULfYCb029011@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:41:33 EDT --- pywbem-0.7.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:41:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:41:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508188] Review Request: pywbem - Python WBEM Client and Provider Interface In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302141.n5ULfcfO029046@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508188 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.7.0-2.fc11 |0.7.0-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:40:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:40:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302140.n5ULeZO9028601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:40:34 EDT --- perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH-4.00-1.fc11.1 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:40:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:40:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506669] Review Request: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBH - Easy DBI access from CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302140.n5ULee1s028641@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506669 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |4.00-1.fc11.1 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:42:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506006] Review Request: perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-CGIApp - Test::WWW::Mechanize for CGI::Application In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302142.n5ULgtfs029406@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506006 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.05-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:41:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:41:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 489564] Review Request: Blueman - Bluetooth Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302141.n5ULfndF029146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=489564 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:41:47 EDT --- blueman-1.10-3.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update blueman'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7170 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:41:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:41:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508440] Review Request: sugar-infoslicer - Downloader for articles from Wikipedia In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302141.n5ULf5hi028847@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508440 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-06-30 17:41:04 EDT --- sugar-infoslicer-5-1.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update sugar-infoslicer'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2009-7167 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 21:43:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:43:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 506007] Review Request: perl-Sub-WrapPackages - Add wrappers around all the subroutines in packages In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302143.n5ULh6w7025480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506007 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.2-1.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 22:34:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:34:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 508483] Review Request: ewl - Enlightenment Widget Library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302234.n5UMYSO3007860@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=508483 Christian Krause changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |chkr at plauener.de AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |chkr at plauener.de Flag| |fedora-review? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 22:52:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 18:52:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 504480] Review Request: rubygem-configuration - Pure Ruby scoped configuration files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302252.n5UMqLll012167@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504480 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Michal Ingeli 2009-06-30 18:52:20 EDT --- * naming OK * license missing in original sources, but Ruby license confirmed by upstream * Clean, legible spec file, American English * source file matches upstream * file list, documentation, permissions OK * builds in mock * rpmlint silent APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 23:25:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:25:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 507475] Review Request: skanlite - Scanning program In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302325.n5UNPPal015026@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507475 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #8 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-06-30 19:25:23 EDT --- CVS done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jun 30 23:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:30:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 502490] Review Request: rubygem-state_machine - Adds support for creating state machines for attributes on any Ruby class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200906302330.n5UNU5ji015841@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502490 Michal Ingeli changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |mi at v3.sk AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |mi at v3.sk Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Michal Ingeli 2009-06-30 19:30:04 EDT --- - bad license. should be MIT [1] - missing require for ruby(abi) - file listed twice warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/state_machine-0.7.4/LICENSE - rubygem-state_machine.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 33, tab: line 7) You can inspire by review made by Mamoru Tasaka for recent ruby gem review [2]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/MIT#Modern_Style_with_sublicense [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504469 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.