[Bug 474787] Review Requrest: stxxl - C++ STL drop-in replacement for extremely large datasets

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474787





--- Comment #15 from D Haley <mycae at yahoo.com>  2009-06-01 06:50:13 EDT ---
I agree with all of the changes made in your SRPM, and support its promotion
pending review. I suppose this makes you co-maintainer? Do we need another
reviewer?

Here are koji builds for the above SRPM, F9 failed, but F10 and F11 are OK. F9
is relatively close to EOL, so I suppose its not a big problem.

F9 : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386757
F10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386748
F11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1386762

>If you consider to bring a GNU Autotools environment (and submit the >corresponding patch upstream), and if I can help you, do not hesitate.  

I think it is not necessarily a good idea to bring a different build system to
STXXL, but instead to help upstream to improve their chosen method. I would
hesitate to recommend a change of build sys to upstream, unless they expressed
an interest in doing so. For this reason I do not have any plans to do such a
thing, unless upstream indicate they would be interested.

In any case, I don't see this as important to this package for this version.
Maybe in a newer upstream version after some petitioning...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.