[Bug 502978] Review Request: python-line_profiler - A Python line-by-line profiler

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 3 03:53:11 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502978


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-06-02 23:53:09 EDT ---
Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1389114
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
c509b763c0d2fe8df1c1b654bc4892c11bb7e83e  line_profiler-1.0b2.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application
+ Package python-line_profiler-1.0-0.3.b2.fc12.i586 =>
  Provides: _line_profiler.so
  Requires: /usr/bin/python libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libpthread.so.0 libpython2.6.so.1.0 python(abi) = 2.6
rtld(GNU_HASH)

APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list