[Bug 502622] Review Request: perl-Config-Properties - Read and write property files

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 3 20:42:40 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502622





--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu>  2009-06-03 16:42:39 EDT ---
Builds fine; rpmlint is silent.

FYI, I agree that conditionally running a test depending on the name of the
user running it is dumb and needs to be patched out.

I can see why this would require Test::More at runtime.  It doesn't appear
anywhere in the final package (save the Changelog, where it talks about the
test suite).

* source files match upstream.  sha256sum:
   afb0e7a20a95f0e8004296fdecd1c320ec7d296cbdb5ce7bbc0a1f75266d7e84  
   Config-Properties-1.70.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
? final provides and requires are sane:
   perl(Config::Properties) = 1.70
   perl-Config-Properties = 1.70-1.fc11
  =
   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
   perl(Carp)
   perl(IO::Handle)
?  perl(Test::More)
   perl(strict)
   perl(warnings)

* %check is present and all tests pass:
  All tests successful.
  Files=7, Tests=52,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.05 usr  0.02 sys +  0.31 cusr  0.07 
   csys =  0.45 CPU)

* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list