[Bug 496635] Review Request: monodevelop-debugger-mdb - Mono Debugger Addin for MonoDevelop
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 3 21:39:10 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496635
--- Comment #24 from Mauricio Henriquez <buhochileno at gmail.com> 2009-06-03 17:39:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> OK Toshio, I'm taking this over.
>
> Mauricio: it's a good practice to try building packages in mock. It looks
> difficult at the beginning (I know this from my own experience) but helps you
> to create high-quality packages.
> For stepping in have a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/MockTricks
>
Ok, this is going to take me a while, currently very bussy and I have to make
some space to do the local mirror, etc...so hopefully the packages created
without mock are at least at a decent quality :-)
> With using mock you'll find out that you need to more build dependencies:
> * mono-debugger-devel instead of mono-debugger
> * mono-addins-devel
fixed in the attached files...
>
> Furthermore I would prefer to adjust the release number to a single number.
>
> The %defattr macro in %files should be %defattr(-,root,root,-)
done...
>
> At the end it would be great if you could split out the *.pc file in a *-devel
> package.
>
no idea how to do that, if you teach me with this package I can apply it ot the
other mono packages that I'm preparing..The mainstream don't do that with the
package, at least not with the opensuse one...
>
> The rest looks really good and builds well. If we solve this last errors I'll
> do the full review.
great!!, thanks, what about the gdb package?, both debuggers addins (mdb and
gdb) for monodevelop are very handy..
> Thanks also to Ryan for creating the fixes!
Yeap, thanks Ryan!!
>
> Paul
Mauricio
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list