[Bug 492224] Review Request: gnome-mud - MUD client for GNOME desktop

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492224





--- Comment #9 from Sean Middleditch <sean at middleditch.us>  2009-06-05 11:49:11 EDT ---
* renamed.  note that upstream has a gnome-mud.spec in the tarball itself,
which is not Fedora compatible (since every distro seems hell bent on creating
artificial incompatibilities through the distro-specific packaging of otherwise
identical binaries).

* fixed license tag.

* fixed gtk build-requires.  removed all versions on build-requires after
checking up the f10 versions via koji.

* wrapped description

* the make install bit I had was copied right out of the wiki for fedora
packaging.  updated to what you provided; might suggest updating the wiki to
actually state best practice.  copying from existing core Fedora packages
clearly isn't a good way to get an idea on best practice either.

* moved desktop-file-validate.  fixed schemas path name (whoops).  removed all
references to scrollkeeper, since it seems that the docs in 0.11.2 are broken
and not installed (worked in svn when I was packaging that).

* changed the %files section reference to the datadir to just
%{_datadir}/%{name} per the wiki's suggestion for ensuring ownership of
directory and all files underneath.

* removed INSTALL from docs

Did a scratch build on Koji and made sure it builds on all archs.  Installed
and testing on my desktop to make sure it actually runs and works.

http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud.spec
http://middleditch.us/sean/gnome-mud-0.11.2-2.fc11.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.