[Bug 478759] Review Request: perl-SystemPerl - SystemPerl Perl module

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Tue Jun 9 19:37:23 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478759


Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #26 from Brennan Ashton <bashton at brennanashton.com>  2009-06-09 15:37:22 EDT ---
[PASS] source files match upstream
[PASS] package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
[PASS] specfile is properly named
[PASS] dist tag is present.
[PASS] build root is correct.
[PASS] license field matches the actual license.
[PASS] license is open source-compatible.
[PASS] latest version is being packaged.
[PASS] BuildRequires are proper.
[PASS] %clean is present.
[N/A] package builds in mock.
    Building with a koji build of perl-Verlog

[PASS] package installs properly.
debuginfo package looks complete.
[PASS] %check is present and all tests pass:
[PASS] owns the directories it creates.
[PASS] doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
[PASS] no duplicates in %files.
[PASS] file permissions are appropriate.
[PASS] no scriptlets present.
[PASS] code, not content.
[PASS] %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.

I Approve with the perl-Verlog in koji.  Lane is right, you should add the new
version requirement of perl-Verlog to the spec. After this go ahead with CVS
request.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list