[Bug 505508] Review Request: acheck-rules - Rules for acheck

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 04:52:41 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505508


Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग) <panemade at gmail.com>  2009-06-15 00:52:39 EDT ---

Review:
+ package builds in mock (rawhide i586).
koji Build =>http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1414186
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM.
+ source files match upstream url
4f794aa188c04abf5b7ec8bb20689a689371d8e1  acheck-rules_0.3.1.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ %doc is present.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ no .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Not a GUI application

APPROVED.

Should:
1) Source URL should be
Source0:       
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/pool/main/a/acheck-rules/%{name}_%{version}.tar.gz
2) also I think you should remove following
Requires:       acheck

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list