[Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 07:18:52 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216
--- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit at redhat.com> 2009-06-15 03:18:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> ? What is this file that gets packaged?
> /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/Mayavi-3.2.0-py2.6-nspkg.pth
>
Removed.
(In reply to comment #11)
> Here is the rest of the review:
>
> * As indicated by LICENSE_COLORBREWER.txt, parts of the file
> enthought/mayavi/core/lut/pylab_luts.py is distributed under ASL 1.1 and it
> should be added to the license tag.
>
Done.
> * image_LICENSE.txt says
> "Crystal: LGPL license as described in icon_LICENSE_CP.txt"
> but icon_LICENSE_CP.txt contains the full text of GPLv2. Can you ask this
> upstream for clarification? Even if they say it is LGPL, we cannot ship this
> icon_LICENSE_CP.txt file as it is wrong.
>
Will remove after asking from upstream after clearing doubts.
> * image_LICENSE_OOo is LGPLv3+ and this has to be added to the license tag.
>
I think LGPLv2+ (as it has or later) covers LGPLv3+ also. Or am I wrong ?
> * docs/mayavi2.man should be packaged. Is this a man1?
Yes included.
>
> ? Is the documentation under docs/source/ worth packaging?
Yes included
Will updated, once I get confirmation from upstream about license.
Thanks,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list