[Bug 482216] Review Request: Mayavi - The Mayavi scientific data 3-dimensional visualizer

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 15 07:18:52 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=482216





--- Comment #14 from Rakesh Pandit <rpandit at redhat.com>  2009-06-15 03:18:51 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> ? What is this file that gets packaged?
>    /usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/Mayavi-3.2.0-py2.6-nspkg.pth
>

Removed.

(In reply to comment #11)
> Here is the rest of the review:
> 
> * As indicated by LICENSE_COLORBREWER.txt, parts of the file
> enthought/mayavi/core/lut/pylab_luts.py is distributed under ASL 1.1 and it
> should be added to the license tag.
>

Done.


> * image_LICENSE.txt says
>    "Crystal: LGPL license as described in icon_LICENSE_CP.txt"
> but icon_LICENSE_CP.txt contains the full text of GPLv2. Can you ask this
> upstream for clarification? Even if they say it is LGPL, we cannot ship this
> icon_LICENSE_CP.txt file as it is wrong.
>

Will remove after asking from upstream after clearing doubts.

> * image_LICENSE_OOo is LGPLv3+ and this has to be added to the license tag.
>

I think LGPLv2+ (as it has or later) covers LGPLv3+ also. Or am I wrong ?

> * docs/mayavi2.man should be packaged. Is this a man1?

Yes included.

> 
> ? Is the documentation under docs/source/ worth packaging?  

Yes included

Will updated, once I get confirmation from upstream about license.

Thanks,

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list