[Bug 503136] Review Request: csync - a file synchroniser utility

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503136





--- Comment #2 from Alex Hudson (Fedora Address) <fedora at alexhudson.com>  2009-06-15 14:17:20 EDT ---
Hi Jussi,

Thanks very much for reviewing this. Sorry it has taken me a little while to
respond!

I've updated the spec and SRPM:

http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync.spec
http://alexh.fedorapeople.org/reviews/csync/csync-0.43.0-2.fc11.src.rpm

* Summary for libs - you're right. I've tried to write something better.

* target platform bits - I've had to do a push/pop because csync doesn't allow
in-source builds, only out-of-source. I'm not sure the KDE4 cmake macro helps
in this regard; https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE gives a similar "Best
practice" (see bottom of page). The alternative would be to patch the build
system, which would be possible, but isn't a system tested by upstream.

* devel requires - yes, you're right again :)

* need for -libs - I plan on packaging the pam-csync module, which uses the
libraries rather than the binary, hence the separation.

* directory ownership - again, you're right: sorry, I'm not sure how I missed
that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.