[Bug 506939] Review Request: dracut - a generic initramfs generator

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Jun 19 16:29:11 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506939





--- Comment #4 from Harald Hoyer <harald at redhat.com>  2009-06-19 12:29:10 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> - License - GPLv2+
> - License field in spec matches - ***
> 
> *** The license in the code is GPLv2 or later; the spec tag should be GPLv2+.
>     It's also not present in most of the shell snippets; unsure what the
> requirements are there.


oh, yes, will change

> - Spec in American English - ***
> 
> generic package description:
> This package requires everything, which is needed to build a generic
> all purpose initramfs.
> 
> Should probably be 'everything that is needed', without the comma.

ok, will change

> - Package needs ExcludeArch - ***
> 
> *** The arch/noarch switching seems a bit odd. Can we just get a new util-linux
> in so we don't need this?

yes, we still have to have this for F-11 and have to wait a little bit for F-12


> The 'generic' package really should be some sort of Suggests/Enhances on the
> main package. Alas, we can't do that yet. (Requiring to pull in nbd seems
> wrong.)

ok, then I rename it to dracut-buildall?

> 
> That being said, if we don't have some sort of requirements on lvm2, raid, etc.
> tools in the main package, the ordering won't be right on kernel installs, and
> it will try to build a non-generic initramfs when the tools haven't yet been
> installed that may be needed for that system. This needs solved before we ship
> it.

if the tools haven't been installed.. so you mean running a lvm / crypto / raid
root without the tools ?


> Other notes:
> - dracut modules live in /usr. Do we need to be able to rebuild the initramfs
> when /usr isn't present?  

good point! and plymouth?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list