[Bug 506720] Review Request: uClibc - C library for embedded Linux

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Jun 24 19:47:24 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506720


Miloslav Trmač <mitr at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|                            |needinfo?(varekova at redhat.c
                   |                            |om)




--- Comment #8 from Miloslav Trmač <mitr at redhat.com>  2009-06-24 15:47:22 EDT ---
> $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/uClibc-0.9.30.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 
> uClibc.src:69: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/*
> uClibc.src:70: E: hardcoded-library-path in $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/lib/
OK, these don't appear in the binary package.
> $ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/uClibc-devel-0.9.30.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 
> 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Blockers:
- License: should AFAICS be "LGPLv2" (no "+")
- "No debuginfo needed" is rather useless reason for disabling debuginfo.
  Perhaps "This package only contains a static library".
- Use %global instead of %define

Other requirements:
- Use %{?_smp_mflags} in (make V=1)
- All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment 

Notes:
- You can use
    %files ...
    %{_includedir}/uClibc
  instead of
    %files ...
    %dir %{_includedir}/uClibc
    %{_includedir}/uClibc/*
  (and the same for _libdir)
- Please consider setting PREFIX instead of DEVEL_PREFIX
- CFLAGS do not use %{optflags}, it probably doesn't make sense in this case
- The ExcludeArch: comment will have to be filed as a bug component creation in
bugzilla
- My POV is that uClibc is a package that can be correctly packaged and made
  available to users of Fedora.
  I probably wouldn't approve a review of any other Fedora package linking
  against uClibc - both anaconda and mkinitrd link against glibc, after all.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list