[Bug 507544] Review Request: perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert - Perl Implementation of Hilberts space filling Curve
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Sat Jun 27 07:04:18 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507544
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-06-27 03:04:17 EDT ---
Builds fine and rpmlint is silent.
I would suggest a tweaked %description with better grammar and capitalization:
The Hilbert curve module provides some useful functions using Hilberts space-
filling Curve. This is handy for things like dithering, flattening
n-dimensional data, fractals - all kinds of things really.
That's terribly minor, so you can fix it up if you like when you check in.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
455c2932e99a4b1609f5b17176b49a18e99fd8af06c76f161d5083d25b57d825
Math-Curve-
Hilbert-0.04.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
x description could use some minor tweaks.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
perl(Math::Curve::Hilbert) = 0.04
perl-Math-Curve-Hilbert = 0.04-1.fc12
=
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(Data::Dumper)
perl(strict)
perl(vars)
* %check is present and all tests pass.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list