[Bug 507110] Review Request: openal-soft - OpenAL-Soft lib

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Sun Jun 28 16:11:22 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507110





--- Comment #9 from Mamoru Tasaka <mtasaka at ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp>  2009-06-28 12:11:21 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I think openal need to be replaced with openal-soft as it is in debian/ubuntu?
> The devs and communtiy is talking about this sicene F10 was under dev.
> What you think about that?

- In such case (i.e. if you think openal should complete by
  replaced by openal-soft), would you contact openal maintainer?
  (Filing a bug against openal component is better with mentioning
   this review request on the filed bug).

> When i will rename all wo openal-soft the tools that need oal-soft header and
> libs will don´t find them.  

- This is okay because in such case it just means that such apps
  should be patched on Fedora.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list