[Bug 504470] Review Request: rubygem-syntax - Ruby library for performing simple syntax highlighting

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504470





--- Comment #2 from Jan Klepek <jan.klepek at hp.com>  2009-06-28 12:27:59 EDT ---
MUST: rpmlint must be run on every package. 
1] rpmlint complaining
rubygem-syntax.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/syntax-1.0.0/test/ALL-TESTS.rb 0644

MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines
- OK

MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
- OK, rubygem package

MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines
- OK, meets packaging guidelines and ruby specific packaging guidelines 

MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines
- OK, public domain

MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
- OK, attached LICENSE file

MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %doc.
- OK

MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
- OK

MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
- OK

MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
- OK

MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
- OK, http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1439866

MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture
- OK, noarch package, builded ok

MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
- OK

MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly.
- OK, no locales available

MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library 
- OK, no shared library

MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable
- OK

MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
- OK

MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings.
- OK

MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly.
- OK

MUST: Each package must have a %clean section, which contains rm -rf
%{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT).
- OK

MUST: Each package must consistently use macros. 
- OK

MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
- OK

MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage.
- OK, no large documentation

MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. 
- OK

MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
- OK, no header files

MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
- OK, no static libraries

MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for
directory ownership and usability). 
- OK, no .pc files

MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix ...
- OK

MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package 
- OK, no -devel package

MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
- OK

MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
- OK, no gui

MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages.
- OK

MUST: At the beginning of %install, each package MUST run rm -rf %{buildroot}
(or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT). 
- OK

MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
-OK

TODO:
rpmlint

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.