[Bug 507958] Review Request: eclipse-rse - Eclipse Remote System Explorer framework

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Mon Jun 29 17:54:49 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507958


Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
                 CC|                            |overholt at redhat.com
         AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org    |overholt at redhat.com
               Flag|                            |fedora-review?




--- Comment #1 from Andrew Overholt <overholt at redhat.com>  2009-06-29 13:54:47 EDT ---
Thanks for the submission, Jeff.  A few comments:

- I think you're missing Requires on eclipse-cdt and eclipse-emf
- will we move to 3.1 once we get a Galileo CDT build?
- please use either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT but not both
- we should perhaps have Eclipse in the Summary field
- I think "framework" can be dropped from the Summary field
- please change the permissions on the fetch script to avoid this rpmlint
warning:

eclipse-rse.src: W: strange-permission fetch-rse.sh 0775

- you should probably mark a top-level feature's about.html as %doc
- you should look for @build@ and replace it with the same qualifier that
upstream uses.  In fact, you should use forceContextQualifier (see
eclipse-mylyn.spec for an example) to ensure our versions are the same as
upstream's for 3.0.3

The package builds for me, follows the packaging guidelines, and functions in
Eclipse.  Thanks for the high quality submission.  Once the minor issues above
are cleaned up, I will approve this.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list