[Bug 474391] Review Request: libbase - JFree Base Services
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 5 22:12:23 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474391
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-03-05 17:12:22 EDT ---
Sorry nobody has looked at this for so long; I've been mostly taking a break
from reviewing packages.
This package looks fine; the only question I have is whether
build-jar-repository should be called in %prep or in %build. The guidelines
don't say one way or the other. I don't think this is worth holding things up
over, although personally I like to be able to prep a package without
installing its dependencies.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
6c4d907e912fbbda8228707540f5dab2954aa0e6f2ce1bd1ed9b4f43a7b6972a
libbase-1.0.0.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:
libbase.jar.so()(64bit)
libbase = 1.0.0-1.fc11
libbase(x86-64) = 1.0.0-1.fc11
=
/bin/sh
jakarta-commons-logging
java
java-gcj-compat >= 1.0.31
jpackage-utils
libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit)
libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit)
libgcj_bc.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* scriptlets are OK (gcj database rebuilding).
* code, not content.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no pre-built jars
* single jar, named after the package
* jarfiles are under _javadir.
* javadocs are under _javadocdir.
* ant called properly.
* no wrapper script necessary.
* gcj called properly.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list