[Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 15:33:56 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376
Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler <kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org> 2009-03-06 10:33:54 EDT ---
> Given that all those which need gus patches explictly require
> PersonalCopy-Lite's gus patches, and that those do a decent job (sf2 to gus
> format conversion is not perfect, as the feature sets of the 2 formats are not
> a 100% match), I see no use in having a gus version of the fluid font, esp.
> given the huge package size this will cause.
Well, the use would be to make them use a truly Free soundfont by default
instead of a just freely distributable one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list