[Bug 467490] Review Request: nwsserver - NetWorkSpaces Server for clustering of scripting languages

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 15:34:31 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467490





--- Comment #2 from Richard W.M. Jones <rjones at redhat.com>  2009-03-06 10:34:30 EDT ---
+ rpmlint output
+ package name satisfies the packaging naming guidelines

Although implemented in python, this is just a general program,
and the name of the program is acceptable to Fedora.

+ specfile name matches the package base name
+ package should satisfy packaging guidelines

Also checked Python guidelines, and OK.

+ license meets guidelines and is acceptable to Fedora
+ license matches the actual package license
+ %doc includes license file

There isn't a license file, but %doc includes the nearest thing,
and all source files are marked with the license anyway.

+ spec file written in American English
+ spec file is legible
+ upstream sources match sources in the srpm

d321ae5fd3a363167ac27f7959b56c8a / 22331 bytes

+ package successfully builds on at least one architecture
n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed
+ BuildRequires list all build dependencies
n/a %find_lang instead of %{_datadir}/locale/*
n/a binary RPM with shared library files must call ldconfig in %post and
%postun
+ does not use Prefix: /usr
+ package owns all directories it creates
+ no duplicate files in %files
+ %defattr line
+ %clean contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+ consistent use of macros
+ package must contain code or permissible content
n/a large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage
+ files marked %doc should not affect package
n/a header files should be in -devel
n/a static libraries should be in -static
n/a packages containing pkgconfig (.pc) files need 'Requires: pkgconfig'
n/a libfoo.so must go in -devel
n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base
n/a packages should not contain libtool .la files
n/a packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file
+ packages must not own files or directories owned by other packages
+ %install must start with rm -rf %{buildroot} etc.
+ filenames must be valid UTF-8

Optional:

? if there is no license file, packager should query upstream
n/a translations of description and summary for non-English languages, if
available
+ reviewer should build the package in mock
+ the package should build into binary RPMs on all supported architectures
- review should test the package functions as described
n/a scriptlets should be sane
n/a pkgconfig files should go in -devel
+ shouldn't have file dependencies outside /etc /bin /sbin /usr/bin or
/usr/sbin

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list