[Bug 483376] Review Request: fluid-soundfont - Pro-quality GM/GS soundfont
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 6 17:05:32 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=483376
--- Comment #12 from Orcan 'oget' Ogetbil <oget.fedora at gmail.com> 2009-03-06 12:05:30 EDT ---
Well, it is a matter of choice between freedom and quality (fluid-soundfont)
versus convenience in terms of package size (pclite-soundfont).
I would personally vote for freedom and quality. Also, I believe that many
people who are into music/audio production prefer quality.
If it is up to me I would choose
http://6mata.com:8014/review/fluid-soundfont.spec.with.gus
Note that, you will need to download the SRPM in the original message and
overwrite its SPEC file with this one to review the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list