[Bug 480999] Review Request: python-webflash - Portable flash messages for WSGI apps
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 12 05:28:10 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480999
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-03-12 01:28:10 EDT ---
Builds fine; rpmlint says:
python-webflash.noarch: W: no-documentation
True, and not a problem.
python-webflash.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1-0.1a8
['0.1-0.1.a8.fc11', '0.1-0.1.a8']
I think there's a period missing from the changelog version between "1" and
"a8". Not a huge deal but good to fix.
Does the test suite actually do anything? I just get:
nose.plugins.cover: ERROR: Coverage not available: unable to import coverage
module
I'm not that familiar with python tests so I could use a hint here.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
1fe890b93fd0d06b7c6fb95cce46337e51e6bacd6ed52aaed09ac8bd52126c5e
WebFlash-0.1a8.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
X rpmlint has a valid complaint.
* final provides and requires are sane:
python-webflash = 0.1-0.1.a8.fc11
=
python(abi) = 2.6
python-simplejson
? %check is present but I'm completely unsure of whether it's doing anything.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list