[Bug 488407] Review Request: python-text_table - Simple Eyecandy ASCII Tables
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Thu Mar 12 19:03:12 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488407
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody at fedoraproject.org |tibbs at math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs at math.uh.edu> 2009-03-12 15:03:11 EDT ---
I believe the license issue is sufficiently resolved.
rpmlint says:
python-text_table.noarch: E: non-executable-script
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/text_table.py 0644
This is the usual "starts with a shebang but isn't executable" problem. I
still have no idea why python programmers do this. I don't particularly think
it's a problem but you can sed out the shebang line if you like.
python-text_table.noarch: E: description-line-too-long This module provides
an
interface to output simple ASCII tables. It is based on
That goes right to 80 characters. That's really the only real problem I see,
so I'll approve this and you can reflow the %description when you check in.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
e66bb3f653879b7799b7928b762bbba2fd086c17f3fc55891c92c796be9c5f48
text_table-0.02.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
X rpmlint has a valid complaint.
* final provides and requires are sane:
python-text_table = 0.02-2.fc11
=
python(abi) = 2.6
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED, just re-wrap the description.
The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package
reviews recently, please consider doing one.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list