[Bug 491892] Review Request: openscap - Set of open source libraries enabling integration of the SCAP line of standards

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Wed Mar 25 09:52:58 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491892





--- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael at gmx.net>  2009-03-25 05:52:37 EDT ---
Results of a brief look at the spec:

> Source0:        %{name}-%{version}.tar.gz

Full URL is missing here.


> Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
> Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig

These two are automatic/implicit already because -p is used with %post/%postun.


> %files
> %defattr(-,root,root,-)
> %doc AUTHORS COPYING ChangeLog INSTALL NEWS README

In case this is the standard 'INSTALL' file, it is irrelevant to RPM package
users.


> %package        devel
> License:        LGPLv2+
> Requires:       pkgconfig

> %package        python
> License:        LGPLv2+
> Requires:       pkgconfig

Neither of these two subpackages need pkg-config. The License tag need not be
defined for subpackages as it is copied from the main package. You only need to
redefine it if the licence of a subpackage differs from the main pkg actually.


Anyone who will review this, %doc docs  may need a close look.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list