[Bug 492501] New: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library

bugzilla at redhat.com bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 27 01:57:25 UTC 2009


Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.

Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501

           Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port
                    of the LibTIFF library
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
         Component: Package Review
        AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
        ReportedBy: ploujj at gmail.com
         QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
                CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
   Estimated Hours: 0.0
    Classification: Fedora


Spec URL: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libtiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc10.src.rpm

Hi! I just finished writing the mingw32 libtiff spec file. I used
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libtiff/devel/libtiff.spec?revision=1.53&view=markup
as the basis for this spec file. For your convenience, here is the patch file
between the original and my spec: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/libtiff.patch
.

Some specific questions:
Should I keep the "%define LIBVER..." part?
Is the multilib hack relevant for mingw cross-compiling libraries? Should I
just remove it?
I suspect that tiffgt, sgti2tiff and tiffsv don't build unless relevant
libraries are available. Should I keep the commands which delete those
executables? Currently, I commented them out.


Description: 
The libtiff package contains a library of functions for manipulating
TIFF (Tagged Image File Format) image format files.  TIFF is a widely
used file format for bitmapped images.  TIFF files usually end in the
.tif extension and they are often quite large.

The libtiff package should be installed if you need to manipulate TIFF
format image files

Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW

rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc10.noarch.rpm
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffvers.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.hxx
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiff.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf-64.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.




More information about the Fedora-package-review mailing list