[Bug 492501] New: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library
bugzilla at redhat.com
bugzilla at redhat.com
Fri Mar 27 01:57:25 UTC 2009
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port of the LibTIFF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492501
Summary: Review Request: mingw32-libtiff - MinGW Windows port
of the LibTIFF library
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody at fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: ploujj at gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org
CC: notting at redhat.com, fedora-package-review at redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/mingw32-libtiff.spec
SRPM URL: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SRPMS/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc10.src.rpm
Hi! I just finished writing the mingw32 libtiff spec file. I used
http://cvs.fedoraproject.org/viewvc/rpms/libtiff/devel/libtiff.spec?revision=1.53&view=markup
as the basis for this spec file. For your convenience, here is the patch file
between the original and my spec: http://plouj.com/rpmbuild/SPECS/libtiff.patch
.
Some specific questions:
Should I keep the "%define LIBVER..." part?
Is the multilib hack relevant for mingw cross-compiling libraries? Should I
just remove it?
I suspect that tiffgt, sgti2tiff and tiffsv don't build unless relevant
libraries are available. Should I keep the commands which delete those
executables? Currently, I commented them out.
Description:
The libtiff package contains a library of functions for manipulating
TIFF (Tagged Image File Format) image format files. TIFF is a widely
used file format for bitmapped images. TIFF files usually end in the
.tif extension and they are often quite large.
The libtiff package should be installed if you need to manipulate TIFF
format image files
Approved MinGW packaging guidelines are here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/mingw32-libtiff-3.8.2-13.fc10.noarch.rpm
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffvers.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffio.hxx
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiff.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/tiffconf-64.h
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiffxx.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: E: arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
/usr/i686-pc-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/libtiff.dll.a
mingw32-libtiff.noarch: W: non-standard-dir-in-usr i686-pc-mingw32
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
More information about the Fedora-package-review
mailing list